GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Education LearningTop 10 Best Class Monitoring Software of 2026
Top 10 Class Monitoring Software picks for proctoring and reporting, with side-by-side comparisons of ClassMarker, ProctorExam, and Kryterion.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
ClassMarker
Real-time class monitoring tied to online test delivery and analytics
Built for schools and trainers needing integrated testing and learner progress monitoring.
ProctorExam
Editor pickLive invigilation with evidence trails and post-session review artifacts
Built for educational providers needing audit-ready exam monitoring for regulated assessments.
Proctoring by Kryterion
Editor pickProctoring control room with live escalation and session audit trails
Built for institutions needing live plus automated monitoring with audit-ready incident workflows.
Related reading
Comparison Table
This comparison table evaluates class monitoring tools such as ClassMarker, ProctorExam, Kryterion proctoring, Respondus LockDown Browser, and Respondus Monitor by integration depth, data model, and the automation and API surface used for provisioning and reporting. It also compares admin and governance controls across RBAC roles, configuration options, extensibility, and audit log coverage to show how each platform manages accountability and throughput.
ClassMarker
assessment proctoringRuns browser-based tests and quizzes with live and timed exam delivery, enabling instructor control over access during assessment sessions.
Real-time class monitoring tied to online test delivery and analytics
ClassMarker stands out for pairing live class management with assessment workflows, so monitoring ties directly into quizzes and testing. It supports student tracking, session control, and analytics that show participation and results.
Administrators can manage question banks and deliver online tests while monitoring progress through reporting dashboards. The result is a single system for both instruction oversight and measurable learner performance.
- +Assessment delivery and monitoring are integrated in one workflow
- +Reports show student activity and results for quick oversight
- +Question bank tools support reusable content across classes
- +Role-based controls help keep instructors and administrators organized
- –Monitoring is strongest around testing activities, not general surveillance
- –Setup for complex class structures can require careful configuration
- –Customization options for monitoring views are limited compared to bespoke tools
K-12 teachers monitoring active quizzes
Track students during live test sessions
Faster intervention on struggling students
Test coordinators running scheduled exams
Control access and session timing
Consistent exam delivery and oversight
Show 2 more scenarios
Training managers measuring cohort progress
Use assessments to evaluate learning outcomes
Clear reporting on training effectiveness
Managers deliver online tests and track performance trends across learner groups.
School administrators managing question banks
Maintain content and generate monitoring reports
Better assessment alignment across classes
Administrators organize question banks and monitor class performance through dashboards.
Best for: Schools and trainers needing integrated testing and learner progress monitoring
More related reading
ProctorExam
remote proctoringDelivers online exams with remote proctoring workflows and exam monitoring features for supervised testing sessions.
Live invigilation with evidence trails and post-session review artifacts
ProctorExam is a class monitoring solution that supports live exam supervision with recorded evidence for later review. It combines browser and device lockdown controls with real-time alerts tied to suspicious activity, then packages session artifacts for instructor and administrator audits. This setup supports structured incident handling when violations are detected during the exam window.
A key tradeoff is that stricter lockdown settings can increase student setup failures, especially on unmanaged devices or locked-down browsers. ProctorExam fits best for institutions running high-stakes assessments that require both live invigilation and a review trail for after-action decisions. It is also well-suited for consistent enforcement across multiple sections where staff need the same evidence set.
- +Live proctoring plus recorded playback supports both real-time and post-exam review
- +Device and browser control features reduce tab switching and background activity
- +Alerting and session reports provide usable evidence for grading decisions
- –Setup can be intricate for IT teams coordinating device and browser requirements
- –Alert volume may require manual triage during high-stakes sessions
- –Session recording and monitoring can add overhead for proctors and admins
University course instructors
Review flagged incidents after proctored exams
Faster, evidence-backed case decisions
Testing operations administrators
Standardize monitoring across multiple sections
Uniform compliance documentation
Show 2 more scenarios
Proctoring staff
Handle live alerts during live invigilation
Quicker intervention, clearer records
Proctors respond to real-time warnings about suspicious behavior while preserving session context for later playback.
Department exam coordinators
Reduce cheating in supervised assessments
Lower integrity risk
Coordinators run browser and device restrictions alongside alerting to deter prohibited actions during exams.
Best for: Educational providers needing audit-ready exam monitoring for regulated assessments
Proctoring by Kryterion
enterprise proctoringProvides remote assessment delivery and proctoring services that support monitored exam sessions for online testing.
Proctoring control room with live escalation and session audit trails
Kryterion’s Proctoring centers on managed live proctoring plus automated identity and behavior checks for online assessments. It supports class-like monitoring workflows using a proctoring control room, learner video capture, and audit trails tied to test sessions.
The solution integrates monitoring into exam delivery so institutions can review incidents without relying on manual video exports. Reporting and compliance artifacts are designed to support academic integrity reviews after each assessment.
- +Live proctoring with structured escalation and session controls
- +Automated identity and behavior signals that reduce manual review time
- +Centralized audit trails that support academic integrity decisions
- +Operational tooling for institutions running many concurrent sessions
- –Workflow setup and proctoring rules can be complex for smaller teams
- –Reviewing incidents still requires careful, time-consuming examiner judgment
- –Operational dependencies can limit flexibility for highly customized exam UX
Academic assessment program managers
Run live monitored exams with auditability
Faster integrity incident resolution
Compliance and academic integrity teams
Review identity and behavior anomalies
Consistent investigation standards
Show 2 more scenarios
Distance learning IT teams
Integrate proctoring into exam delivery
Lower administrative overhead
Monitoring embeds into assessment delivery to reduce manual evidence collection and exports.
Instructional designers and course owners
Monitor high-stakes course assessments
More defensible outcomes
Session-level reporting supports after-exam review workflows without relying on separate footage handling.
Best for: Institutions needing live plus automated monitoring with audit-ready incident workflows
More related reading
Respondus LockDown Browser
test lockdownRestricts test-taking environments in Windows and macOS so monitored exams run in a locked browser mode.
Automated flagged video and screen events for instructor review workflow
Respondus Monitor is distinct for embedding live proctoring signals into the Respondus testing workflow used by many learning management systems. It can capture webcam and screen activity during online exams and then flag recordings for instructor review. It also supports case management tools that help staff review flagged attempts without needing to watch every session end to end.
- +Integrates monitoring directly into existing exam delivery workflows
- +Automated flags reduce manual review workload for instructors
- +Case review tools help staff evaluate flagged behaviors consistently
- –Configuration and test setup can be time consuming for new courses
- –Flagging accuracy can vary by environment and student behavior
- –Limited visibility into fine-grained monitoring rationale for every flag
Best for: Institutions running LMS-based high-stakes exams needing streamlined monitoring workflows
Respondus Monitor
webcam monitoringUses webcam and screen monitoring during online exams to flag potential misconduct for instructor review.
Automated flagged video and screen events for instructor review workflow
Respondus Monitor is distinct for embedding live proctoring signals into the Respondus testing workflow used by many learning management systems. It can capture webcam and screen activity during online exams and then flag recordings for instructor review. It also supports case management tools that help staff review flagged attempts without needing to watch every session end to end.
- +Integrates monitoring directly into existing exam delivery workflows
- +Automated flags reduce manual review workload for instructors
- +Case review tools help staff evaluate flagged behaviors consistently
- –Configuration and test setup can be time consuming for new courses
- –Flagging accuracy can vary by environment and student behavior
- –Limited visibility into fine-grained monitoring rationale for every flag
Best for: Institutions running LMS-based high-stakes exams needing streamlined monitoring workflows
Honorlock
AI proctoringProvides AI-assisted remote exam monitoring with live review workflows for instructors and administrators.
AI-driven suspicion detection that flags risky behavior for reviewer follow-up
Honorlock stands out with automated proctoring that uses browser-based checks to detect suspicious behavior during online exams. It combines webcam, screen monitoring, and AI-driven flags to support both instructor review and remediation workflows. The platform also supports lockdown-style exam control and integrations that help deliver assessments inside common LMS environments.
- +Browser-based monitoring reduces proctor setup complexity
- +AI flags help staff focus on likely academic integrity issues
- +LMS integration supports smoother exam delivery workflows
- –False positives can trigger manual review workload
- –Network and device readiness affect monitoring reliability
- –Advanced configuration takes time for consistent exam enforcement
Best for: Institutions needing scalable automated proctoring with instructor review
More related reading
Examity
human proctoringDelivers remote proctoring with live human monitoring options for live and asynchronous online exams.
Live remote proctoring with real-time monitoring and proctor-driven session enforcement
Examity stands out for delivering remote, proctored testing with live session controls and an integrated workflow for exam delivery. It supports identity verification, screen monitoring, and rules-based handling of test-taker behavior during an active proctoring session. Class monitoring is built around real-time supervision plus post-session reporting that institutions can use for compliance and audit trails.
- +Live proctoring with visual oversight and intervention controls
- +Identity verification and session integrity checks reduce impersonation risk
- +Exam workflow supports scheduled sessions and consistent proctor handling
- –Instructor visibility can feel limited without specialized administrative views
- –Setup effort is higher than lighter class monitoring tools
- –Behavior enforcement relies on proctor process rather than fully automated detection
Best for: Institutions running remote proctored exams needing integrity and audit reporting
Willo
exam monitoringSupports live online assessment monitoring workflows to supervise exams and review flagged behaviors.
Real-time engagement monitoring dashboard that highlights at-risk participation during instruction
Willo distinguishes itself with class-wide monitoring that focuses on learning-room activities and student engagement signals instead of only attendance logs. It centralizes live classroom visibility, assignment context, and progress tracking in a single dashboard.
The core workflow supports teacher oversight and lightweight interventions when performance or participation changes. Reporting emphasizes actionable classroom snapshots over broad academic analytics.
- +Live classroom visibility for engagement and participation signals
- +Single dashboard combines oversight, progress, and task context
- +Reports are oriented toward teacher actions during the lesson
- +Workflow reduces manual checking across multiple tools
- –Limited depth for long-term analytics compared with specialized platforms
- –Fewer advanced admin controls for complex multi-class structures
- –Intervention options can feel basic for highly differentiated instruction
Best for: Teachers and small teams needing quick class monitoring and actionable snapshots
More related reading
Avira and Content Watch combined proctoring
remote proctoringProvides online exam monitoring with proctoring controls and review tools for supervised test sessions.
Automated risk alerts with evidence capture for quick review of suspected incidents
Avira paired with Content Watch for combined proctoring centers on identity checks and learner-monitoring workflows delivered through a single proctoring experience. Core capabilities include webcam and screen observation, rule-based test integrity controls, and live or recorded review of session events.
The solution also supports automated alerts to flag risky behaviors for faster instructor review and intervention. Admin tooling focuses on exam setup, proctor configuration, and investigation of incidents tied to a specific assessment attempt.
- +Combines identity verification with continuous session monitoring for stronger integrity
- +Supports recorded evidence review tied to specific assessment attempts
- +Automated alerts help triage incidents instead of manual video scanning
- –Configuration can be complex across multiple monitoring and alert settings
- –Flag accuracy can increase false positives during atypical user behavior
- –Workflow for large cohorts can feel cumbersome without strong templates
Best for: Schools and training teams running supervised and recorded online exams
Securly
device monitoringMonitors student device activity for schools with web filtering and visibility controls during classroom use.
Policy-based monitoring and alerting for managed student devices
Securly stands out with broad school-environment coverage that supports classroom monitoring across websites, devices, and student activity. It focuses on managed filtering, policy-based monitoring, and alerting so administrators can detect and respond to risky behavior. The product also includes reporting views that summarize trends for schools and class-level contexts for teachers.
- +Strong policy-based monitoring with activity visibility across student devices
- +Actionable alerting helps staff respond to high-risk events quickly
- +Filtering and reporting align with typical school compliance workflows
- –Setup and tuning policies can require repeated administrator adjustment
- –Classroom monitoring workflows may feel heavy for small teams
- –Some reports are harder to translate into teacher-ready actions
Best for: Schools needing managed, policy-driven device and web monitoring with reporting
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 education learning, ClassMarker stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Class Monitoring Software
This buyer's guide covers ClassMarker, ProctorExam, Proctoring by Kryterion, Respondus LockDown Browser, Respondus Monitor, Honorlock, Examity, Willo, Avira and Content Watch combined proctoring, and Securly. It focuses on integration depth, data model design, automation and API surface, and admin and governance controls across live supervision and post-session review workflows. It also maps tools to concrete use cases like high-stakes LMS exams, multi-section incident evidence trails, and classroom engagement monitoring dashboards.
Class monitoring and supervised assessment tooling for live oversight plus audit-ready evidence
Class Monitoring Software captures learner activity signals during instruction or supervised testing and routes them into instructor workflows and admin reporting. These tools reduce manual checking by packaging session artifacts like flagged video and screen events or proctoring control-room audit trails for later review.
ClassMarker fits this model by tying real-time class monitoring to online test delivery and analytics with role-based controls for instructors and administrators. ProctorExam and Proctoring by Kryterion show the higher-audit side by combining live supervision with recorded evidence and incident handling workflows for after-action decisions.
Integration depth, data model, automation surface, and governance controls
Evaluation should start with integration depth because monitoring outputs only become actionable when they land in the right LMS, exam delivery flow, or admin reporting space. Tools that embed monitoring into an existing exam workflow, like Respondus Monitor and Respondus LockDown Browser, reduce the gap between assessment UX and evidence capture. Next, the data model matters because evidence packaging and audit trails must attach to the right attempt, session, or class roster to support investigations.
Attempt-bound evidence capture and playback
ProctorExam packages session artifacts for instructor and administrator audits with live invigilation evidence and post-session review playback. Avira and Content Watch combined proctoring adds automated risk alerts with evidence capture tied to specific assessment attempts so investigations can start from the alert.
Control-room incident workflows with audit trails
Proctoring by Kryterion uses a proctoring control room with live escalation and session audit trails for academic integrity reviews after each assessment. This structure supports consistent incident handling across concurrent sessions better than tools that only deliver raw flags.
LMS-embedded monitoring workflow hooks
Respondus Monitor and Respondus LockDown Browser embed webcam and screen monitoring directly into the Respondus testing workflow many learning management systems use. This improves operational fit for institutions that need streamlined exam monitoring without building a separate supervision application layer.
AI-assisted flagging with reviewer follow-up routing
Honorlock uses AI-driven suspicion detection that flags risky behavior for reviewer follow-up and pairs it with browser-based checks. This reduces the volume of manual review by sending staff to likely academic integrity issues instead of requiring full-session scanning.
Class-wide engagement monitoring dashboard signals
Willo centers class-wide monitoring on learning-room activities and student engagement signals in a single dashboard. It focuses reporting on actionable classroom snapshots rather than only compliance evidence for supervised exams.
Role-based access and progress analytics tied to learning activities
ClassMarker supports role-based controls for instructors and administrators and provides progress visibility through reporting dashboards tied to quizzes and tests. This data model supports oversight for participation and results without relying purely on after-the-fact incident review.
Decision framework for supervised testing versus classroom monitoring, then governance depth
Start by defining whether the primary job is supervised assessment integrity or classroom engagement oversight. Proctoring-focused tools like ProctorExam, Proctoring by Kryterion, Honorlock, Examity, Respondus Monitor, and Respondus LockDown Browser revolve around webcam and screen signals, identity checks, and evidence trails tied to exam windows. Class-wide tools like ClassMarker and Willo prioritize instruction oversight and learner progress or engagement signals inside the teaching workflow.
Map the monitoring target to the tool category and evidence type
If supervised testing integrity and audit artifacts are the goal, prioritize ProctorExam, Proctoring by Kryterion, Honorlock, Examity, Respondus Monitor, or Avira and Content Watch combined proctoring. If instruction oversight and student activity visibility are the goal, prioritize ClassMarker for assessment-tied monitoring or Willo for engagement snapshot dashboards.
Check integration fit with your exam delivery or LMS workflow
For LMS-based high-stakes exams using the Respondus testing workflow, Respondus Monitor and Respondus LockDown Browser embed signals directly into that delivery path. For structured multi-section supervision where staff need the same evidence set and incident artifacts, ProctorExam and Proctoring by Kryterion align monitoring into exam supervision workflows.
Validate the data model ties signals to sessions, attempts, and rosters
Evidence must attach to the exact assessment attempt so staff can open an incident and review relevant playback without re-matching data. ProctorExam and Avira and Content Watch combined proctoring package evidence for later review tied to a specific attempt, while ClassMarker attaches participation and results reporting to class assessment delivery and analytics.
Assess automation and reviewer workload through flagging and alerting behavior
If AI flags drive the review workflow, Honorlock routes staff to suspicious activity via AI-driven suspicion detection and browser-based checks. If live escalation reduces silent failure during exam windows, Proctoring by Kryterion provides escalation in a proctoring control room with session audit trails.
Require admin controls that match governance needs
For split responsibilities between instructors and administrators, ClassMarker emphasizes role-based controls and reporting dashboards built for organized oversight. For regulated integrity reviews, Proctoring by Kryterion and ProctorExam emphasize audit-ready incident workflows with session artifacts and evidence trails for after-action decisions.
Test for operational friction that impacts throughput during high-stakes sessions
If device readiness affects reliability, tools like Honorlock and Examity can encounter monitoring reliability issues tied to network and device conditions or proctor workflow enforcement. If lockdown strictness impacts student setup success, ProctorExam warns that stricter lockdown settings can increase student setup failures on unmanaged devices.
Which institutions, admins, and teaching teams get the most from these monitoring workflows
Different teams need different monitoring objects because some tools focus on supervised assessment integrity and others focus on classroom engagement and participation visibility. The best choice follows the tool's stated best-for fit, which aligns evidence outputs, dashboards, and admin workflows to specific operational responsibilities.
Schools and trainers combining assessment delivery with learner progress oversight
ClassMarker fits because it ties real-time class monitoring to online test delivery with participation and results analytics plus role-based controls for instructors and administrators.
Institutions running high-stakes exams that must produce audit-ready evidence for incident review
ProctorExam fits because it combines live invigilation with recorded evidence trails and packages session artifacts for after-action audits, including device and browser control with alerting. Proctoring by Kryterion also fits because it uses a proctoring control room with live escalation and centralized audit trails for academic integrity decisions.
Teams standardizing LMS-based exam workflows around Respondus
Respondus Monitor and Respondus LockDown Browser fit because they embed webcam and screen monitoring directly into the Respondus testing workflow and provide case management for reviewing flagged attempts.
Organizations seeking scalable AI-assisted monitoring with instructor follow-up routing
Honorlock fits because it uses AI-driven suspicion detection and browser-based checks to flag risky behavior for reviewer follow-up while supporting lockdown-style control and LMS integration.
Teachers needing rapid classroom engagement signals instead of compliance-grade evidence
Willo fits because it provides a real-time engagement monitoring dashboard focused on learning-room activities and at-risk participation snapshots with actionable teacher-oriented reporting.
Pitfalls that break monitoring workflows in real deployments
Many failed rollouts come from choosing a tool that produces the wrong kind of output for the governance process. Tools that are strong around exam windows can be weak for general surveillance, and tools that excel in classroom engagement may not package audit-ready evidence for regulated incidents. Operational configuration also drives outcomes because lockdown settings and monitoring reliability depend on device and browser readiness.
Treating exam integrity tools as general classroom surveillance
ClassMarker is strongest for monitoring tied to testing and quizzes, while its review notes monitoring is strongest around testing activities rather than general surveillance. For classroom device and web activity monitoring, Securly focuses on policy-based monitoring and alerting across student devices instead of supervised exam evidence workflows.
Ignoring evidence-to-attempt mapping requirements
If evidence cannot be attached to the specific assessment attempt, incident reviews become manual and slow. ProctorExam and Avira and Content Watch combined proctoring package session artifacts for later review tied to assessment attempts, which reduces re-matching across systems.
Overlooking reviewer workload from alert volume or false positives
ProctorExam warns that alert volume may require manual triage during high-stakes sessions, and Honorlock notes false positives can trigger manual review workload. Selecting AI-driven flagging workflows that include reviewer routing, like Honorlock, or using control-room escalation patterns, like Proctoring by Kryterion, helps staff avoid drowning in low-signal alerts.
Assuming lockdown strictness will not affect student setup success
ProctorExam notes that stricter lockdown settings can increase student setup failures on unmanaged devices or locked-down browsers. For LMS-based workflows, Respondus Monitor and Respondus LockDown Browser embed monitoring into Respondus delivery, which can reduce extra setup steps compared with standalone proctoring.
Underestimating configuration time for consistent multi-course enforcement
Respondus Monitor and Respondus LockDown Browser state that configuration and test setup can be time consuming for new courses. ProctorExam and Proctoring by Kryterion also describe intricate workflow setup for IT teams, so planning includes rule design and operational validation rather than only purchasing the tool.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated ClassMarker, ProctorExam, Proctoring by Kryterion, Respondus LockDown Browser, Respondus Monitor, Honorlock, Examity, Willo, Avira and Content Watch combined proctoring, and Securly using the same scoring framework across features, ease of use, and value. Features carries the most weight with 40% influence on the overall score, while ease of use and value each account for 30%.
Scores were produced from criteria-based ratings and detailed capability notes that were provided for each tool, not from private benchmark experiments or lab testing. ClassMarker set itself apart by combining real-time class monitoring tied directly to online test delivery with analytics that show participation and results, which lifted the features factor alongside strong ease-of-use and value ratings in the provided metrics.
Frequently Asked Questions About Class Monitoring Software
How do ClassMarker and Willo differ in what they monitor during instruction?
Which tools provide audit-ready evidence after an exam window: ProctorExam, Kryterion, or Examity?
Which options embed monitoring into an LMS test workflow: Respondus Monitor vs Proctoring by Kryterion?
What are the tradeoffs between stricter lockdown settings and student setup success in live proctoring?
How do Honorlock and Proctoring by Kryterion handle suspicious behavior using automation?
Which tools are better suited for consistent enforcement across multiple sections with the same evidence set?
What integration and automation expectations are typical for these platforms when wiring exams into a broader data model?
How do admin controls and investigation workflows differ between Avira plus Content Watch and Respondus Monitor?
Which tool set fits policy-based monitoring for school environments rather than exam-only proctoring?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Education Learning alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of education learning tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare education learning tools→