GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
AI In IndustryTop 10 Best Chip Programming Software of 2026
Ranked roundup of the top 10 chip programming software for Arduino and Nordic boards, including PlatformIO, Nordic nRF Connect SDK, and TaskLink.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Data I/O TaskLink is the best fit when manufacturing teams need repeatable automated programming execution with controlled verification outcomes, whereas DediProg Software is a stronger alternative if you’re production-focused on SPI flash, EEPROM, and eMMC and want consistent verify runs via its hardware workflow.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Data I/O TaskLink
Production recipe orchestration that binds programmer actions and verification gating to line execution and results capture.
Built for fits when manufacturing teams need repeatable programming execution with controlled verification outcomes..
DediProg Software
Editor pickIntegrated device support workflows that coordinate programmer operation, image loading, and verify steps per chip family.
Built for fits when production engineering needs consistent programming and verify runs using DediProg hardware workflows..
PEmicro PROG Software
Editor pickProgram sequence control stays anchored to PEmicro programmer state, which reduces disconnects between session setup and verification.
Built for fits when production teams need repeatable host-controlled flashing with verified results..
Related reading
Comparison Table
Chip programming software tools orchestrate JTAG and SWD sessions, manage flash and EEPROM operations, and export production job data for traceable workflows. This ranked shortlist targets analysts and operators who must compare automation depth, device support breadth, and tooling fit against dev stacks like Arduino IDE, PlatformIO, and Nordic nRF Connect SDK.
Data I/O TaskLink
enterpriseTaskLink manages Data I/O automated programming systems and production job data.
Production recipe orchestration that binds programmer actions and verification gating to line execution and results capture.
TaskLink is built around job recipes that define which device variant gets which programming image and which verification checks must pass before a unit is marked complete. Workflow execution ties programmer actions to the larger production step, including result capture for later reporting and troubleshooting. It also supports configuration of device handling behaviors so that the same recipe can run across shifts without operator-specific variation.
A tradeoff is that TaskLink centers on production orchestration instead of being a firmware authoring environment like Arduino IDE or PlatformIO. A common fit is manufacturing line programming where a workstation needs to run consistent erase, program, and verify cycles while emitting structured results for quality processes.
- +Recipe-driven job orchestration that standardizes production programming steps
- +Verification gating that prevents completing units with failing checks
- +Operational result capture that supports downstream quality review
- +Repeatable throughput workflow designed for manufacturing execution
- –More production-focused than developer-focused firmware editing workflows
- –Device and image mappings require careful recipe maintenance for changes
- –Integration work can require custom interfaces with the plant system
- –Limited utility for quick bench testing without job setup
Manufacturing operations leads
Runs standardized programming jobs at scale
More consistent line throughput
Quality engineers
Captures structured pass or fail results
Faster root-cause analysis
Show 1 more scenario
Manufacturing IT
Integrates job execution with systems
Cleaner workflow handoffs
Runs programming steps under external orchestration while centralizing job configuration and outcomes.
Best for: Fits when manufacturing teams need repeatable programming execution with controlled verification outcomes.
More related reading
DediProg Software
vertical specialistDediProg software controls SPI flash, EEPROM, and eMMC programming equipment.
Integrated device support workflows that coordinate programmer operation, image loading, and verify steps per chip family.
DediProg Software fits production engineering teams that need consistent erase-program-verify behavior across a device support database of supported chip families. It is used alongside DediProg programmer models so the software can manage target communication settings, run verify passes, and maintain a predictable sequencing of programming operations. It also fits shops that already standardize around DediProg hardware and need a single operator workflow for factory programming steps.
A tradeoff appears in environments that need deep custom scripting or extensive automation through a public API surface, since DediProg Software is more workflow driven than developer-extensible. It works best when programming steps are well-defined up front, like flashing a bootloader stage, validating checksums, and then writing configuration fuse fields for test readiness.
- +Device support aligned with DediProg programmer operations
- +Repeatable erase-program-verify sequencing for production batches
- +File and memory mapping handling matches common firmware artifacts
- +Supports configuration and lock-bit style programming workflows
- –Automation depends on workflow setup rather than a broad public API
- –Operator setup is required to match target voltage and device parameters
- –Less suitable for teams seeking highly custom programming scripts
- –Debug-style workflows are not the primary focus versus dedicated tooling
Manufacturing test engineers
Batch program and verify production units
Reduced rework from failed verifies
Embedded firmware release teams
Standardize programming inputs per build
More predictable factory programming
Show 2 more scenarios
Field update qualification labs
Program bootloader and config stages
Earlier detection of config issues
Handles targeted programming sequences for bootloader and configuration fields before validation.
Hardware bring-up teams
Inject per-unit identity data
Reliable traceability by unit ID
Supports production workflows that write identifiers when targets require serial-number injection.
Best for: Fits when production engineering needs consistent programming and verify runs using DediProg hardware workflows.
PEmicro PROG Software
vertical specialistPEmicro programming software supports production programming for ARM, NXP, and other embedded devices.
Program sequence control stays anchored to PEmicro programmer state, which reduces disconnects between session setup and verification.
PEmicro PROG Software is designed for direct programming tasks that require consistent erase and verify behavior, including blank checks, read-back comparisons, and checksum validation workflows. It can handle the typical host-to-target steps needed for in-system serial programming and factory flashing, and it focuses on the programming session state rather than editing, compiling, or debugging firmware. Device support is governed by a compatibility layer that couples the software build to specific programmer hardware, which reduces ambiguity when multiple probes exist.
The main tradeoff is that it does not replace firmware build pipelines, so image creation still needs separate tools like an IDE, a build system, or a hex-generation step. It fits best when a lab or production operator needs a repeatable programming job definition, then repeatedly runs it with verified results across batches without changing the application-level toolchain.
- +Tight coupling to PEmicro hardware for predictable programming session behavior
- +Program-erase-verify workflows include verification and comparison steps
- +Supports production-style batch flashing with consistent target checks
- +Works well with externally built images in standard firmware formats
- –Not a firmware build or debug environment compared with IDE-based workflows
- –Device and transport support depends on the paired programmer model
- –Automating complex custom flows takes more work than IDE task runners
- –UI workflow is less suitable for code-centric development loops
Manufacturing line operators
Batch flash verified firmware images
Lower rework from verification failures
Embedded validation engineers
Check read-back against expected image
Faster defect isolation
Show 2 more scenarios
Lab technicians
Program multiple variants using device selection
Shorter programming turnaround
Selects supported devices and executes erase and verify sequences without editing source or build scripts.
Systems integrators
Standardize field firmware updates
More consistent field readiness checks
Uses image handling and verification steps to keep update jobs consistent across test benches.
Best for: Fits when production teams need repeatable host-controlled flashing with verified results.
OpenOCD
developer toolOpenOCD provides open-source programming and debugging through JTAG, SWD, and compatible probes.
Target- and interface-driven configuration files that define probe behavior and chip-specific programming sequences.
OpenOCD provides JTAG and SWD debug and programming control through a scriptable command server. It uses target and interface definitions that map debug probe capabilities to chip-specific behavior via configuration files.
Core workflows include flash erase, program, verify, and memory reads using standard image formats such as ELF and Intel HEX. Automation and integration come from driving OpenOCD over its telnet or GDB-oriented control paths while generating consistent log output for build and test pipelines.
- +JTAG and SWD command control for debug and programming in one tool
- +Scripted target configuration enables repeatable chip bring-up
- +ELF and Intel HEX handling supports common firmware build outputs
- +Telnet and GDB interfaces support pipeline automation
- –Board and target configuration files require manual maintenance
- –Flash programming workflows need careful device selection and memory map setup
- –Error reporting can be low-level during connection or boundary scans
- –Multi-target gang programming is not a built-in orchestration feature
Best for: Fits when teams need script-driven JTAG or SWD flashing plus debug control across multiple boards.
XGecu Xgpro
SMBXgpro controls XGecu universal programmers for SPI flash, EEPROM, NAND, and microcontroller devices.
Integrated target voltage detection paired with device-specific memory layout definitions to enforce correct erase and program ranges.
XGecu Xgpro performs chip programming by driving compatible programmer hardware through a desktop workflow focused on erase, program, and verify cycles for common flash and EEPROM parts. It supports common firmware image formats such as Intel HEX, Motorola S-record, and raw binary, then maps images into a device-specific memory layout during programming.
Xgpro is distinct for how tightly its workflow is tied to the Xgpro programmer family, including target voltage handling and device definitions that gate which operations are offered. The software also provides bootloader-oriented workflows for devices that are handled through supported protocols and device entries, rather than through a general script-only interface.
- +Device definitions constrain actions to known memory layouts
- +Supports Intel HEX, S-record, and binary imports for common images
- +Target voltage detection reduces mismatches during erase and program
- +Verify checks run as part of the standard workflow
- –Workflow is geared to supported device entries, limiting arbitrary devices
- –Automation surface is thin compared with SDK-based toolchains
- –Batch programming needs tighter operator control than code-driven pipelines
- –Protocol edge cases depend on what the device database exposes
Best for: Fits when production benches need a guided programmer workflow with device definitions and verify steps.
Elnec PG4UW
enterprisePG4UW operates Elnec programmers for production, engineering, and device-support workflows.
Recipe-based programming flows that bind device steps to Elnec programmer control for stable production station behavior.
Elnec PG4UW pairs Elnec programmer control with an authoring workflow for production programming using Elnec hardware. It supports loading common firmware image formats and driving erase, program, verify, and read-back checks tied to the programmer’s target connection.
Configuration is centered on the Elnec PG4UW environment, which maps device recipes to specific sockets and gang-capable setups. For teams that standardize production stations, it reduces operator variation by keeping device programming steps consistent across runs.
- +Production-oriented recipe workflow for repeatable programming cycles
- +Tight coupling to Elnec programmer hardware reduces step mismatch
- +Consistent verify options support reliable read-back validation
- +Supports common image-based flashing workflows for manufacturing tasks
- –Limited flexibility outside supported Elnec programmer models
- –Automation depth lags general developer tooling with scripts
- –Device coverage depends on the Elnec device support database
- –Advanced station setups require careful socket and wiring configuration
Best for: Fits when production teams run repeated programming cycles on Elnec hardware with device recipes.
STM32CubeProgrammer
vertical specialistSTM32CubeProgrammer programs and configures STM32 devices through USB, UART, SWD, and JTAG.
Device-specific actions mapped to STM32 part selection with programming and verify steps that follow Cube tooling expectations.
STM32CubeProgrammer is a vendor-focused programming tool built around STM32 device support and Cube-style workflows. It supports USB and other probe backends for erasing, programming, verifying, and reading memory with common image formats.
The software is designed for repeated production-style cycles with progress visibility and batch-friendly operations for engineers who work close to STM32 parts. Compared with general-purpose IDE upload flows, it provides more direct programming-step control and stronger device-specific behaviors.
- +STM32 device database drives target selection and memory operations
- +Scriptable batch programming supports repeated erase-program-verify runs
- +Clear status and verification reporting for image and device read-back
- +Works with common STM32 debug and programming probe configurations
- –Workflow is STM32-centric, so non-STM32 device coverage is limited
- –Gang programming and parallel throughput controls are not the focus
- –Project-level automation is weaker than code-build toolchains
- –Some target and connectivity setups require manual probe configuration
Best for: Fits when teams need STM32-focused programming control for production-style flashing cycles.
MPLAB X IDE
developer toolMPLAB X IDE builds and programs Microchip PIC, AVR, SAM, and dsPIC devices.
Device-pack driven configuration and tool integration that keeps programming and debug settings aligned per target.
MPLAB X IDE is the Microchip-focused development and programming environment that connects tightly with Microchip device support for debug and firmware flows. It integrates project management, device configuration, and programming/debug actions through MPLAB IDE’s toolchain and device pack ecosystem.
MPLAB X IDE is most efficient when using Microchip-supported programmers and debuggers for repeatable erase-program-verify cycles and consistent memory handling. Its automation story relies on IDE tooling integration and build-driven workflows rather than exposing a broad external API surface.
- +Strong Microchip device support via device packs
- +Integrated debug and programming workflows in one project
- +Consistent memory image import and verify actions
- +Direct compatibility with supported Microchip programmer hardware
- –Automation and external API surface is limited for custom production pipelines
- –Non-Microchip device workflows require extra glue and tool mixing
- –Project setup can be heavyweight compared with lighter editors
- –Gang programming and large-scale production orchestration are not first-class
Best for: Fits when teams build and program Microchip MCUs using supported debug probes and want IDE-managed programming steps.
Batronix Prog-Express
SMBProg-Express programs flash memory, EEPROM, microcontrollers, and logic devices with Batronix hardware.
Programming job definitions that bind device compatibility data to image operations for consistent production execution.
Batronix Prog-Express is chip programming software used to drive production and test programming workflows through Batronix programmer hardware. It focuses on turning firmware images into device-ready operations like erase, program, verify, and read-back checks across supported device families.
The workflow is organized around programming tasks and device compatibility settings rather than build automation for source code. It is best evaluated by how consistently it maps supported memory layouts and file formats into a repeatable operation sequence on the connected programmer.
- +Task-based programming sequences reduce operator variation
- +Clear erase, program, and verify cycles align with production expectations
- +Supported device and memory definitions simplify repeatable job setup
- +File-to-device mapping supports common production image formats
- –Limited developer workflow automation compared with firmware build toolchains
- –Device support depends on the included compatibility database
- –Automation depth is constrained when custom programming logic is needed
- –Debug-style workflows depend on programmer features outside the software
Best for: Fits when production labs need repeatable programming jobs with strict verify behavior.
flashrom
developer toolflashrom reads, writes, verifies, and erases firmware chips on supported systems and programmers.
Device-to-programmer mapping in one tool, driving correct command sequences for many flash models.
flashrom is a command-line chip programming tool for reading, erasing, and programming flash memories through many common programmer interfaces. Its distinct capability is fast access to a large device-programmer database that maps supported flash parts to voltage and command sequences.
The workflow centers on repeatable erase-program-verify cycles, with options for memory layout control and multiple image formats for programming. flashrom fits teams that need ISP and production-style flash steps without a full application build system.
- +Broad flash-part support driven by an internal device-programmer database
- +Scriptable command-line flows for read, erase, program, and verify operations
- +Clear flash verification options with read-back and compare-oriented workflows
- +Works for standalone, in-system, and gang-style programming setups via supported hardware
- –Configuration and hardware matching demand careful setup of target voltage and wiring
- –No built-in workflow UI, so complex production steps need external scripting
- –Less convenient for mixed firmware build pipelines than IDE-centric toolchains
- –Debug-probe integration and target discovery are limited to supported interface modes
Best for: Fits when production flash steps must be automated with deterministic verify cycles.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 ai in industry, Data I/O TaskLink stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right chip programming software
Chip programming software is the host layer that coordinates programmer hardware behavior, device selection, and verification steps for ISP, ICSP, USB programming, gang programming, and production flashing workflows.
This buyer’s guide covers Data I/O TaskLink and nine other tools, including DediProg Software, PEmicro PROG Software, OpenOCD, XGecu Xgpro, Elnec PG4UW, STM32CubeProgrammer, MPLAB X IDE, Batronix Prog-Express, and flashrom, with a practical ranking that also keeps Arduino IDE and PlatformIO in view where they change the development-to-programming workflow.
Chip programming software that runs consistent ISP, ICSP, JTAG, SWD, and production verify workflows
Chip programming software packages device support databases, memory operation controls, image format handling, and erase-program-verify cycles so manufacturing stations and lab benches can run repeatable programming tasks.
Some tools, like Data I/O TaskLink, focus on production recipe orchestration that binds programmer actions to verification gating and captures line execution results, which targets deterministic throughput on controlled stations.
Other tools trade that production packaging for scriptable control, like OpenOCD, which drives target and interface behavior through configuration files that define JTAG and SWD command sequences for repeatable bring-up and flashing.
Evaluation criteria that separate chip programming software workflows
Chip programming software must control the full erase-program-verify sequence with device-specific memory operations so the station output stays consistent. Because the host layer coordinates programmer hardware behavior, the most visible differences show up in programming step orchestration, how device definitions drive memory ranges, and how repeatability is enforced.
Production recipe orchestration with verification gating
Data I/O TaskLink binds programmer actions and verification checks to line execution results using production recipes. Batronix Prog-Express also defines programming job steps, but TaskLink focuses on line-ready orchestration and results capture rather than operator task definitions.
Device support workflows aligned to a programmer’s operational model
DediProg Software coordinates device support steps with DediProg hardware operations, including erase-program-verify sequencing for batches. PEmicro PROG Software keeps sequence control anchored to PEmicro programmer state, which reduces drift between session setup and verification.
Scriptable target and interface configuration for JTAG and SWD bring-up
OpenOCD uses target- and interface-driven configuration files that define probe behavior and chip-specific programming sequences. flashrom uses a device-to-programmer mapping database to drive correct command sequences, which is scriptable via command-line flows but not built around probe configuration files.
Memory layout definitions that constrain erase and program ranges
XGecu Xgpro pairs integrated target voltage detection with device-specific memory layout definitions so the erase and program ranges stay constrained. XGecu-style guided workflows mirror the protection goal, while STM32CubeProgrammer instead derives target actions from an STM32 part selection database for STM32-centric operations.
Device-pack driven configuration and IDE-aligned programming steps
MPLAB X IDE uses Microchip device packs to keep programming and debug settings aligned per target. STM32CubeProgrammer follows Cube tooling expectations for STM32 parts and supports scriptable batch programming, but it remains STM32-centric in scope.
Recipe workflows tied tightly to a specific programmer station
Elnec PG4UW runs production-oriented recipe workflows that bind device steps to Elnec programmer control for stable station behavior. DediProg Software also coordinates programmer workflows per chip family, but Elnec’s flexibility is more limited outside supported Elnec programmer models.
How to choose chip programming software based on workflow philosophy and control depth
Start by matching the workflow packaging to the programming context because production stations emphasize repeatability and controlled verification outcomes, while engineering benches emphasize scriptable probe control and rapid iteration. Next, confirm that the device support mechanism drives memory operations the way the station expects, because mismatches in memory map setup and device parameter handling lead to failed verify outcomes or incorrect erase ranges.
Pick production recipe orchestration when programming output must be deterministic
Choose Data I/O TaskLink when manufacturing needs recipe orchestration that binds programmer actions and verification gating to execution results for controlled throughput. Choose Data I/O TaskLink over Batronix Prog-Express when standardizing job execution must include line execution outcomes rather than operator task definitions.
Pick programmer-state anchored control when station sessions must stay consistent
Choose PEmicro PROG Software when repeatable host-controlled flashing depends on keeping program sequence control anchored to PEmicro programmer state. Choose DediProg Software instead when the priority is a coordinated device support workflow aligned to DediProg programmer operations across chip families.
Pick probe configuration driven flashing when JTAG or SWD bring-up is part of the workflow
Choose OpenOCD when the workflow needs target and interface configuration files that define probe behavior and chip-specific programming sequences together with debug control. Choose flashrom only when the main requirement is scriptable command-line read, erase, program, and verify operations driven by its internal device-to-programmer database rather than probe-level sequences.
Pick device definition guidance with voltage awareness for correct memory range enforcement
Choose XGecu Xgpro when the station needs integrated target voltage detection paired with device-specific memory layout definitions to enforce correct erase and program ranges. Choose STM32CubeProgrammer when the requirement is STM32-focused memory operations driven by STM32 part selection in Cube expectations.
Pick IDE-managed programming when development and programming steps must remain project-aligned
Choose MPLAB X IDE when Microchip device packs should keep programming and debug settings aligned per project within one workflow. Choose Arduino IDE or PlatformIO only when the development-to-programming workflow must flow from firmware build integration, then use the category tool that fits the target device programming steps.
Who benefits from each chip programming software style
Manufacturing groups benefit from software that standardizes erase-program-verify sequencing and reduces operator variation through recipe or job definitions. Engineering teams benefit when the host layer supports probe-level scripting, repeatable target bring-up, and deterministic memory map setup across boards.
Manufacturing lines running repeated programming cycles on one programmer model
Elnec PG4UW and STM32CubeProgrammer suit repeated cycles because they bind device steps to programmer or Cube expectations for repeated erase-program-verify runs.
Production engineering teams coordinating programming and verification for batch output
DediProg Software and PEmicro PROG Software support consistent batch programming by coordinating device support steps to the programmer’s operational model and verification behavior.
Teams doing multi-board JTAG or SWD bring-up and scripted flashing
OpenOCD fits when the workflow needs both debug and programming controlled through target and interface configuration files rather than only device-to-programmer command mapping.
Benches that prioritize correct voltage-aware memory range targeting
XGecu Xgpro supports device-specific memory layout enforcement with integrated target voltage detection, which reduces incorrect range programming risk during guided runs.
Labs that mix programming parts and want command-line automation with broad flash model mapping
flashrom fits when scriptable command-line flows must handle many flash-part combinations through an internal device-programmer mapping database.
Common pitfalls when selecting chip programming software
Many failed verify outcomes come from configuration drift between the host software and the device parameters that define memory operations. Other failures come from choosing software that is optimized for a different workflow style, such as an IDE-aligned environment for a production station that needs strict orchestration.
Treating programmer-state control as equivalent to recipe orchestration
PEmicro PROG Software anchors sequence control to PEmicro programmer state, while Data I/O TaskLink binds actions to verification gating and execution results through production recipes.
Assuming flash-part command mapping automatically covers probe-level flashing needs
flashrom provides device-to-programmer mapping and command-line scripting, but OpenOCD’s target- and interface-driven configuration files are what define probe behavior and chip-specific programming sequences together.
Planning for flexible device coverage without budgeting for device definitions maintenance
OpenOCD requires board and target configuration maintenance for repeatable bring-up, and XGecu Xgpro constrains operations to supported device entries with device definitions as the workflow boundary.
Using an IDE-focused tool as the sole production automation layer
MPLAB X IDE aligns programming steps with device packs and integrated debug workflows, but it has limited automation and external API surface for custom production pipelines compared with recipe or script-first production tools.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Data I/O TaskLink, DediProg Software, PEmicro PROG Software, OpenOCD, XGecu Xgpro, Elnec PG4UW, STM32CubeProgrammer, MPLAB X IDE, Batronix Prog-Express, and flashrom on workflow fit, repeatability controls, and practical execution mechanisms. Features accounted for 40% of the ranking, with emphasis on recipe or job orchestration, verification behavior, device support workflows, and file or mapping systems that drive memory operations.
Ease and value each accounted for 30% by measuring how directly each tool translates device parameters and programmer behavior into repeatable erase-program-verify cycles. Data I/O TaskLink earned the top rank by combining production recipe orchestration, verification gating tied to execution results, and standardized step capture for controlled manufacturing throughput.
Frequently Asked Questions About chip programming software
How do Arduino IDE, PlatformIO, and Nordic nRF Connect SDK differ from chip programming tools like STM32CubeProgrammer for production-style flashing?
Which software supports script-driven JTAG or SWD programming without an IDE session, and how is automation typically wired?
When does a team choose OpenOCD over MPLAB X IDE for programming verification across multiple debug probes?
How does TaskLink handle programming throughput compared with standalone programming tools like Batronix Prog-Express?
What breaks if a workflow assumes a generic memory layout but the programmer software needs device-specific mapping?
How do recipe-based station controls differ between Elnec PG4UW and desktop-style batch workflows like DediProg PROG Software?
Which tools provide a stronger job definition model for production programming than a standard IDE upload action?
When does flashrom outperform IDE-based workflows for ISP-style flash steps on known targets?
Where does security control typically fall short when comparing desktop programming packages like PEmicro PROG Software to command-line tools like flashrom?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
AI In Industry alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of ai in industry tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare ai in industry tools→