GITNUXSOFTWARE REVIEW
Entertainment & EventsTop 10 Best Casting Database Software of 2026
Top casting database software comparison for film and casting teams, with YurMe, Spotlight, and Casting Call Club tradeoffs for shortlisting.
How we ranked these tools
Vendors set the topic, but our editors set the inclusion criteria and the evaluation framework before research starts.
AI search agents find sources, extract figures with provenance, and aggregate written reviews. They also transcribe video reviews and podcasts.
Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page. This does not influence our reviews. Editorial policy
YurMe is the best pick for casting teams that need a talent database without losing media context, thanks to its profile-centric records that connect reels and representation details for shortlist-ready searching, while Spotlight is a strong alternative for mid-size teams since its API-driven syncing brings role and workflow state into outside production systems.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
YurMe
Profile-centric casting records connect media assets and representation details to shortlist-ready search without extra tooling.
Best for: Fits when casting teams need a focused talent database with collaboration and media-first profile management.
Spotlight
Editor pickAPI access that enables programmatic synchronization of talent records and casting workflow state into external production systems.
Best for: Fits when mid-size casting teams need a role-centric database plus API-driven integrations.
Casting Call Club
Editor pickCasting posts coordinate applicant submissions, threaded updates, and role status changes in one place.
Best for: Fits when community-sourced casting needs fast shortlist building and thread-based communication.
Comparison Table
YurMe
enterpriseEnterprise casting and production software combining talent CRM with audition and proposal management.
Profile-centric casting records connect media assets and representation details to shortlist-ready search without extra tooling.
YurMe centers its casting workflow around searchable talent records tied to casting-specific fields, which makes it more focused than general applicant tracking tools. The system supports managing media assets like headshots and reels alongside representation details, so casting teams can compile shortlists without leaving the database.
YurMe also provides collaboration for casting staff and a history of communication so roles and submissions stay traceable across stages. CSV import and export help move existing talent lists and role data into a consistent workflow.
- +Casting-focused talent fields reduce manual mapping during shortlist building
- +Media asset management keeps headshots and reels close to profile records
- +Collaboration and communication history support team handoffs across stages
- +CSV import and export supports migration of talent and role data
- –Workflow depth for audition scheduling depends on how roles are configured
- –API automation is not the primary interface, so high-volume ingestion needs planning
- –Bulk outreach and availability checks can feel limited for complex scheduling rules
- –Reporting coverage relies on built-in views rather than fine-grained custom metrics
casting directors
Build shortlists from filtered talent
Faster shortlist creation
casting office coordinators
Track submission history across stages
Clear audit trail
Show 1 more scenario
production admins
Migrate rosters via CSV
Reduced manual reentry
Imports and exports talent and role data in CSV so existing spreadsheets can feed the casting database.
Best for: Fits when casting teams need a focused talent database with collaboration and media-first profile management.
Spotlight
vertical specialistSpotlight provides casting professionals with searchable performer profiles, breakdowns, submissions, and audition management.
API access that enables programmatic synchronization of talent records and casting workflow state into external production systems.
Spotlight centralizes casting workflows around talent records connected to role-driven processes. It keeps people and media assets together so casting staff can search for performers and review associated headshots, reels, and other submission materials without switching systems.
The workflow includes collaboration features around submissions and casting status updates, so internal changes stay attached to the relevant candidates. CSV workflows move talent and role data in and out, and an API supports syncing spotlighted records into other production tools.
A clear tradeoff is that Spotlight focuses on a casting-database workflow rather than a generic applicant tracking setup, so teams that need broad HR hiring features may find it narrower. It fits studios or casting offices managing multiple roles with frequent status updates and ongoing communication threads tied to candidates.
- +Casting workflow status tracking tied to roles and submission history
- +Talent search filters support fast narrowing across large databases
- +Media asset storage for headshots and linked résumé or reel materials
- +API and integrations support syncing casting records into other systems
- –Advanced governance needs clear role conventions and disciplined updates
- –Bulk CSV workflows can be less reliable for complex mapping than guided imports
- –Audit-style history depth depends on how teams record submission notes
- –User interface complexity rises with multi-role, high-volume casting pipelines
casting managers
Coordinate submissions across team
Fewer status mismatches
post production supervisors
Sync talent records into pipeline
Less data copying
Show 1 more scenario
casting administrators
Import and export CSV rosters
Cleaner round-to-round data
Moves breakdown lists and talent records through CSV workflows to keep datasets current.
Best for: Fits when mid-size casting teams need a role-centric database plus API-driven integrations.
Casting Call Club
vertical specialistOnline platform connecting voice actors and content creators for casting projects.
Casting posts coordinate applicant submissions, threaded updates, and role status changes in one place.
Casting Call Club is a casting database built around talent listings, character breakdown posts, and audition workflows that center on community sourcing. The system supports role status movement, audition submissions, and casting shortlist management inside a single workflow loop.
Talent records include headshot style media, résumé text, and links to reels or demos when those are provided in the profile content. Casting Call Club also provides messaging and update threads tied to specific casting posts to keep applicant context attached to the role.
- +Role and audition workflow stays centered on a single casting post
- +Applicant threads keep audition updates attached to the relevant submission
- +Search and filters support practical talent discovery by posted role needs
- +Bulk communication tools reduce repetitive outreach during rounds
- –Admin controls for multi-role casting teams are limited for governance
- –No documented enterprise API surface for custom automation and provisioning
- –Media handling stays oriented around public casting posts rather than libraries
- –Import export tooling for structured talent datasets is limited
independent casting teams
Source audition talent from listings
More incoming auditions
casting directors
Move candidates through role status
Faster decision cycles
Show 2 more scenarios
creative producers
Review demos linked to profiles
Better candidate screening
Stores headshot style media plus résumé text and reel or demo links on talent records for review.
casting coordinators
Message applicants on post threads
Reduced lost context
Connects messaging and update threads to specific casting posts so applicant communications remain organized.
Best for: Fits when community-sourced casting needs fast shortlist building and thread-based communication.
Casting Networks
vertical specialistCasting Networks manages casting calls, talent submissions, project workflows, and searchable performer records.
Role status workflow ties applicant activity and notes to each casting stage for audit-friendly decisions.
Casting Networks is built around casting listings, applicant intake, and role status tracking, with workflows that surface where each candidate stands during auditions and callbacks. Casting teams can manage structured talent profiles and attach media so auditions can be reviewed without hunting across spreadsheets. Collaboration features focus on keeping notes and decisions tied to the applicant record so casting history stays legible to multiple users.
- +Role status workflow keeps applicants synchronized across auditions and callbacks
- +Central talent records link headshots and reels for faster candidate review
- +Search and filtering support casting shortlist building from large applicant sets
- +Applicant notes and activity history reduce back-and-forth during reviews
- –Workflow customization can be limited compared with fully custom applicant tracking setups
- –Complex integrations require careful mapping of roles, contacts, and media fields
- –Bulk updates can be slower when media assets require validation
Casting directors
Track auditions and callbacks
Fewer missed updates
Agency submission coordinators
Manage agency submissions
Cleaner submissions
Show 2 more scenarios
Producers and production teams
Build casting shortlists
Faster shortlist creation
Filter candidates by role criteria and review linked media without spreadsheet rework.
Casting operations staff
Maintain applicant data quality
Lower re-entry work
Use structured talent profiles and export workflows to keep records consistent across projects.
Best for: Fits when casting teams need role-to-applicant history with shared review and consistent shortlist management.
Actors Access
vertical specialistTalent submission and breakdown platform for film and television casting.
Role-centered audition intake inside one talent profile database, including submission status flow across auditions and callbacks.
Actors Access records casting notices and manages audition submissions from a single talent profile database. It combines talent search and role-specific breakdown handling with scheduling workflows for audition and callback tracking.
- +Talent discovery and submissions follow role workflows without extra tools
- +Media asset library keeps headshots, résumés, and video links attached to performers
- +Search filters and roster lists speed up casting shortlist creation
- +Communication history links notes and updates to the audition pipeline
- –Advanced governance controls rely on role discipline across casting teams
- –Bulk workflows can feel limited for complex cross-role scheduling
- –API extensibility is not the primary integration path for custom pipelines
- –Data import and export coverage may require manual cleanup for edge cases
casting directors
Search talent and assign breakdown roles
Quicker candidate matching
audition coordinators
Track auditions and callbacks
Fewer scheduling errors
Show 2 more scenarios
talent managers
Store performer media materials
Less back-and-forth
Centralizes headshots, résumés, and video links per talent profile so casting teams can review quickly.
casting operations
Sync rosters using CSV updates
More consistent records
Imports and exports lists so performer and roster changes can propagate without manual edits.
Best for: Fits when casting teams need repeatable audition intake and shortlist management for ongoing projects.
Casting Crane
vertical specialistWeb-based casting platform for studios, networks, and production companies.
Casting workflow views that connect breakdown status, audition submissions, and notes in one candidate-centric timeline.
Casting Crane is a casting database software built for keeping talent and role information in one searchable system. The tool is organized around casting workflows like breakdown tracking and audition submissions so teams can move candidates through each stage.
- +Searchable talent and media records reduce time spent switching tools
- +Role stage tracking keeps breakdown updates consistent across the team
- +Representation and résumé fields support submission-ready candidate profiles
- +CSV import and export helps migrate existing casting lists quickly
- –Workflow configuration takes discipline when multiple role status paths exist
- –Audit history depth is limited for granular change review across fields
- –Bulk communication tools are basic for complex outreach segmentation
- –Media hosting integration options are narrower than dedicated video systems
casting office admins
Filter candidates using structured fields
Faster retrieval
casting directors
Manage audition submissions by stage
Clear stage progression
Show 2 more scenarios
production coordinators
Centralize headshots and related materials
Less media hunting
Keeps a media asset library for headshots and linked materials so casting reviews stay in one place.
casting team leads
Maintain consistent representation details
Fewer data inconsistencies
Admin workflows manage representation data and keep audition notes consistent across the casting team.
Best for: Fits when casting teams need a single searchable talent and role record with practical workflow tracking.
Production Tools
vertical specialistCasting database software for directors and producers to collect and review talent submissions.
API-accessible casting data enables custom intake, scheduling sync, and reporting without manual export loops.
Production Tools is designed around operational casting records, so teams can keep headshot and résumé links, audition notes, and role progress in a single database. Casting teams can filter talent by structured attributes and track audition outcomes through a role status workflow. Production Tools supports CSV import and export for onboarding and periodic reconciliation with existing talent lists.
- +API supports custom casting workflows and third-party integration
- +CSV import and export speeds talent list migration and cleanup
- +Configurable role status workflow keeps audition outcomes consistent
- +Searchable talent records reduce manual lookup during casting
- –Workflow configuration effort increases for highly custom breakdowns
- –Advanced automation depends on API usage rather than no-code rules
- –Media asset management depth can lag specialized libraries
- –Bulk changes require careful validation to avoid field mismatches
Casting directors and casting ops teams
Track audition outcomes per role
Fewer duplicated updates
Production managers
Coordinate scheduling and availability
Lower reschedule churn
Show 2 more scenarios
Agency and representation coordinators
Manage submissions at scale
Faster turnarounds
Batch update talent records and submission details while keeping casting history searchable.
Technical teams supporting casting
Automate intake into the casting system
Higher intake throughput
Use the API to route forms and self-tape intake into Production Tools for processing.
Best for: Fits when casting teams need API-driven automation around talent, auditions, and role status tracking.
Casting42
vertical specialistAll-in-one customizable casting database for casting directors, production companies, and extras agencies.
Role-focused applicant workflow that keeps each submission tied to structured role context through selection and handoff.
Casting42 is a casting database software with a talent-profile-centric workflow for managing roles and applicants.
- +Structured role and applicant workflow reduces manual status tracking.
- +Searchable talent profiles support fast shortlisting and review.
- +Media asset links keep headshots and reels attached to profiles.
- +Bulk updates and exports reduce admin effort during casting rounds.
- –Complex multi-role reporting requires more manual filtering than expected.
- –Automation coverage is lighter than tools with deeper scheduling integrations.
- –Audit and governance controls are not as granular as enterprise hiring suites.
- –Data import formats can be restrictive when mapping existing records.
casting directors
Review candidates from reusable roles
More standardized casting
casting coordinators
Ingest high-volume submissions
Reduced admin overhead
Show 2 more scenarios
talent relations teams
Screen headshots and reels together
Better pre-screening
Stores headshots, reels, and supporting links with each talent profile to support faster candidate evaluation.
production analysts
Export updated records for reporting
Timelier reporting data
Uses built-in export options to pull the latest selection and scheduling inputs into downstream workflows.
Best for: Fits when casting teams need a searchable talent database with media-linked profiles and repeatable role tracking.
Cast It Talent
enterpriseCast It Talent provides searchable talent profiles, audition management, and casting workflow tools.
Configurable role status workflow ties audition and callback progress to each project role record.
Cast It Talent organizes casting activity around records for talent, submissions, and project roles, which helps teams keep casting data consistent across the pipeline. Search and filter behavior supports targeted talent selection using stored profile details, while media links centralize headshot and reel references for review cycles. Workflow configuration includes role status tracking and notes so casting teams can preserve decision context across auditions and callbacks.
- +Role status workflow keeps casting decisions tied to each project
- +Searchable talent profiles reduce time spent rebuilding shortlists
- +Media references for headshots and reels stay attached to profiles
- +Collaboration history and notes reduce lost context across handoffs
- –Automation depth depends on integration surface for external tools
- –Complex governance needs more disciplined role-status configuration
- –Bulk operations can feel limited for very large roster migrations
Casting directors
Track auditions and callbacks per role
Faster callback scheduling decisions
Casting operations teams
Standardize intake across projects
Less rework on submissions
Show 2 more scenarios
Agency coordination teams
Manage talent representation records
Quicker agency submission responses
Maintains structured talent details and linked media for rapid review cycles.
Producers and show runners
Review casting context across handoffs
Clearer decision provenance
Preserves audit-like activity and notes tied to roles and auditions.
Best for: Fits when casting teams need structured submissions and shortlist management without custom pipeline engineering.
AT2 Casting
vertical specialistOnline casting management software for entertainment industry professionals established in 1995.
Role status workflow that keeps character and shortlist decisions linked to each audition record.
AT2 Casting provides a casting database and workflow for managing talent records, roles, and production casting lists in one place. The system centers on searchable talent data with role status tracking and audition history capture.
- +Casting workflow ties talent records to role and shortlist status
- +Talent profiles support media assets for faster pre-read review
- +Roster transfers are practical via CSV import and CSV export
- +Collaboration history helps casting teams track decisions
- –Advanced automation depends more on process discipline than in-app orchestration
- –Search filters can feel limited for highly specific casting breakdown logic
- –Media handling works best for simple attachments rather than rich catalogs
- –Bulk outreach tools require careful template setup to avoid inconsistency
casting directors
Track casting status for roles
Auditable casting decisions
casting coordinators
Organize submissions with collaboration
Fewer communication gaps
Show 2 more scenarios
studio production teams
Maintain casting lists in one database
Single source of truth
Centralizes production casting lists with searchable talent records and role-driven tracking.
operations staff
Import spreadsheets into roster
Reduced manual data entry
Uses import and export workflows to move roster and candidate information between spreadsheets and the database.
Best for: Fits when casting teams need a centralized talent profile database with shortlist and audition history tracking.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 casting database software, YurMe stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Casting Database Software
Casting database software centralizes talent profiles, role and character breakdown context, and audition intake so casting teams can track submissions and shortlists without spreadsheets. This guide covers Production Tools, Cast It Talent, Casting Networks, Spotlight, Actors Access, Casting Call Club, YurMe, Casting42, AT2 Casting, and Casting Crane.
The differences show up in how each system connects role status workflow to applicant records, how its integration and API surface supports automation, and how governance controls hold multi-role casting activity together. Production Tools leads with API-accessible casting data for custom intake, scheduling sync, and reporting without export loops, while Cast It Talent and Casting Networks tie audition and callback progress to each project role record for clearer decision history.
Casting Database Software for talent profiles, role context, and audition workflow tracking
Casting database software stores talent profiles with media assets like headshots and reels, then links applicants to structured role or character context for repeatable review. It also manages casting workflow state so audition submissions and shortlists move through defined stages with notes and visibility tied to the right role records.
Tools like Production Tools emphasize API-driven automation for syncing casting data into external production systems and reducing manual export loops. Cast It Talent and Casting Networks focus on role status workflow that ties audition and callback progress to project roles, which keeps applicant activity and notes aligned with casting stages for audit-friendly decisions.
Casting workflow control, integration depth, and governance-grade visibility
Casting database software has to keep talent profiles, role context, and audition activity connected so casting decisions stay traceable across submissions and callbacks. The best systems expose integration and automation surfaces that reduce spreadsheet export loops while preserving role-to-applicant history and stage progression.
API-accessible casting data for automation and sync
Production Tools provides API-accessible casting data that enables custom intake, scheduling sync, and reporting without manual export loops. Spotlight also provides API access that supports programmatic synchronization of talent records and casting workflow state into external production systems.
Role status workflow tied to project roles
Cast It Talent uses a configurable role status workflow that ties audition and callback progress to each project role record. Casting Networks ties applicant activity and notes to each casting stage so role-to-applicant history stays audit-friendly.
Applicant stage tracking with a candidate-centric or timeline view
Casting Crane connects breakdown status, audition submissions, and notes in one candidate-centric timeline. AT2 Casting links character and shortlist decisions to each audition record so decisions remain attached to the underlying audition workflow.
Talent profile media and documentation management
Actors Access keeps a media asset library inside the talent profile with headshots, résumés, and video links attached to performers. YurMe keeps media asset management close to shortlist-ready search by connecting media assets and representation details to profile records.
Import and export workflows for migration and cleanup
Production Tools includes CSV import and export that speeds talent list migration and cleanup. Spotlight supports bulk CSV workflows that can be less reliable when complex mapping is required.
Search filters that shorten shortlist iteration
Spotlight provides talent search filters that narrow fast across large databases. Casting Networks centralizes talent records that link headshots and reels so candidate review moves faster during shortlist building.
Choose based on where workflow state must live and what automation must integrate
The fastest decision path starts by identifying whether casting teams need role-centric workflow state with built-in progress tracking or whether they need a candidate timeline view that organizes status and notes. The next branch should confirm integration depth and API availability because custom intake, scheduling sync, and reporting often require data access beyond guided forms.
Map workflow ownership to a role-centric or candidate-centric workflow model
Cast It Talent and Casting Networks tie audition and callback progress to project roles and casting stages using a role status workflow, which keeps decision context aligned with the right role record. Casting Crane builds a candidate-centric timeline that connects breakdown status, submissions, and notes in a single view for each applicant.
Set the integration expectation before evaluating ease
Production Tools is built around API-accessible casting data so external systems can sync intake, scheduling, and reporting without export loops. Spotlight also offers API access for synchronizing talent records and workflow state, but guided imports can be more reliable than bulk CSV mapping for complex field relationships.
Check how governance stays consistent across multi-role casting teams
Casting Networks ties applicant activity and notes to each casting stage for audit-friendly decision history across teams. Casting Call Club centralizes workflow around a single casting post, but admin controls for multi-role casting teams are limited when governance needs span many roles.
Validate audition intake depth and status flow across auditions and callbacks
Actors Access supports role-centered audition intake inside one talent profile database, including submission status flow across auditions and callbacks. Casting Call Club keeps threaded updates and role status changes attached to the relevant applicant submission through casting posts.
Confirm media linkage matches the review workflow
Actors Access attaches headshots, résumés, and video links inside the performer profile so reviewers do not switch systems. YurMe connects media assets and representation details to shortlist-ready search so profile-first collaboration stays media-forward.
Who benefits most from Casting Database Software
Casting database software benefits teams that manage multiple concurrent roles and need consistent role-to-applicant stage history across auditions and callbacks. It also benefits teams that must sync casting workflow state into external production systems using API-driven automation instead of spreadsheet handoffs.
Casting directors and supervisors running multi-role breakdowns
Cast It Talent and Casting Networks keep audition and callback progress tied to each project role record or casting stage, which reduces confusion when multiple characters run in parallel.
Operations teams coordinating scheduling and reporting with production systems
Production Tools and Spotlight expose API access that supports programmatic synchronization of talent records and casting workflow state so teams can avoid export loops.
Small to mid-size casting teams standardizing intake and shortlist building
Actors Access and Casting42 keep audition submissions and shortlist decisions tied to structured role or audition context so repeatable intake does not require a separate workflow tool.
Studios or agencies that prioritize media-first review during shortlisting
Actors Access and YurMe attach media assets directly to performer profiles and shortlist-ready search so reviewers can move from pre-read to shortlist without extra navigation.
Community-driven casting teams managing thread-based updates
Casting Call Club supports casting posts with applicant threads and role status changes in one place, which fits workflows where updates must stay anchored to the relevant submission.
Common pitfalls when buying Casting Database Software
Casting teams often fail when workflow state is modeled differently than the team’s current decision process for roles, auditions, and callbacks. Teams also stumble when integrations are assumed to be available through bulk files instead of API-driven automation that can keep workflow state synchronized across systems.
Selecting a tool that hides workflow state outside the role record
Production Tools and Spotlight both emphasize API-accessible workflow state, so casting teams can keep status synchronized with external systems instead of reconstructing stage context from exports.
Assuming admin and governance controls scale to multi-role complexity
Casting Call Club keeps workflow centered on a single casting post, but admin controls for multi-role casting teams are limited, which can break governance expectations during wide casting windows.
Overestimating bulk CSV reliability for complex role and media mapping
Spotlight notes that bulk CSV workflows can be less reliable for complex mapping than guided imports, so teams should test mapping scenarios for role fields and media linkage before migrating.
Buying for search speed while ignoring how decisions attach to stage history
Casting Networks ties applicant activity and notes to each casting stage for audit-friendly decisions, while Casting42 can require more manual filtering for complex multi-role reporting.
Choosing a workflow view that conflicts with how casting notes and changes must be reviewed
Casting Crane offers a candidate-centric timeline that connects breakdown status, submissions, and notes, so teams that review changes by applicant should validate that view matches internal review habits.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated casting database software on feature coverage for casting workflow state, API surface for automation and integration, and operational usability for everyday casting tasks. Features carried the largest weight because the systems must connect talent profiles to role context and applicant activity without manual reconstruction.
Ease and value each carried the next weight because casting teams depend on consistent configuration and day-to-day execution. Production Tools earned the top rank because its API-accessible casting data supports custom intake, scheduling sync, and reporting without manual export loops, which directly targets automation depth and reduces spreadsheet-based throughput.
Frequently Asked Questions About Casting Database Software
What differentiates Production Tools from a more role-centric database like Spotlight for casting workflow execution?
How does CSV import and export change data migration effort compared with manual entry workflows?
Which tools support an API surface for integrating casting data into external scheduling or production systems?
How is auditability handled when casting teams collaborate across roles, stages, and notes?
What breaks if RBAC is missing or cannot be configured for casting administrators and casting assistants?
Where does Cast It Talent fall short if a team needs fully custom pipeline logic beyond status and assignment tracking?
When should a casting team pick Actors Access over Casting42 for recurring audition intake and callback tracking?
What tradeoff occurs when the casting process is organized around casting posts and threaded updates instead of role-centric database workflows?
How should teams handle media asset libraries so headshots and reels remain usable during search and shortlist review?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Funding and competing interests
This study was co-funded by several of the vendors assessed in it. No single vendor funded it. Funders could propose the market studied.
They had no role in selecting vendors, setting or weighting criteria, analysing data or drawing conclusions, and they received the same factual-accuracy check as every other vendor assessed.
Market definition, inclusion rules and criteria weights were fixed by an editor before research began and did not change afterwards. Editorial process →
- Review · 2026 · Entertainment EventsMovie Database Software
- Review · 2026 · Data Science AnalyticsDatabase Programming Software
- Review · 2026 · Entertainment EventsAudition Management Software
- Review · 2026 · Entertainment EventsEntertainment Booking Software
- Review · 2026 · Entertainment EventsPodcast Streaming Software
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Entertainment & Events alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of entertainment & events tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare entertainment & events tools→