GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Customer Experience In IndustryTop 10 Best Call Loggin Software of 2026
Top 10 call loggin software ranking with comparison criteria and tradeoffs for sales, support, and call analytics teams.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Salesloft is the best pick when service and sales teams need call logging tied to CRM activity and automated follow-up, whereas Retreaver fits when service teams want consistent logging anchored to phone infrastructure through a more API-first setup.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Salesloft
Sequence and CRM activity association that keeps logged calls actionable for managers and reps.
Built for fits when service and sales teams need call logging tied to CRM activity and automated follow-up..
Retreaver
Editor pickSearchable transcription indexing that stays attached to call log metadata for rapid QA navigation.
Built for fits when service teams need consistent call logging tied to phone infrastructure..
Marchex
Editor pickTranscript indexing that supports fast phonetic retrieval across large recording libraries for QA review.
Built for fits when service teams need transcript search and QA scorecards tied to structured interaction analytics..
Comparison Table
Salesloft
enterpriseSales engagement platform with integrated call logging, recording, and dialing capabilities.
Sequence and CRM activity association that keeps logged calls actionable for managers and reps.
Salesloft ties logged calls to its activity model for sequences, so reps see call outcomes in the same place as emails and tasks. It uses integrations to push call-linked insights into the CRM workflow, which reduces manual re-entry of notes. Interaction analytics and search on engagement signals support QA review and manager follow-up without switching systems for every call.
A tradeoff is that call recording depth depends on connected telephony and capture setup, so the experience can vary by dialer and PBX path. Salesloft fits best when service or revenue teams need call logging coordinated with follow-up automation and CRM state changes.
- +Call outcomes sync into CRM-linked activity history
- +Sequence context reduces missed follow-up after calls
- +Interaction analytics supports coaching and review workflows
- +RBAC limits access to call-related data and settings
- –Call capture quality depends on telephony integration setup
- –Advanced call QA workflows require additional configuration
- –Media export and transcription controls are not purely internal
- –High-volume logging can increase admin work for governance
Revenue teams with outbound motions
Log calls inside sequence activity
More reliable follow-up completion
Sales managers running QA
Review logged calls by engagement signals
Faster call review cycles
Show 1 more scenario
Sales operations and admins
Govern call logging access and integrations
Reduced access sprawl
RBAC and integration configuration control which teams can view and act on call data.
Best for: Fits when service and sales teams need call logging tied to CRM activity and automated follow-up.
Retreaver
API-firstCall tracking and routing platform with real-time call analytics and visitor-level attribution.
Searchable transcription indexing that stays attached to call log metadata for rapid QA navigation.
Retreaver is best evaluated as a call-logging system that concentrates on transport capture and an audit-friendly record of call events. It supports export formats for downstream review workflows and pairs call recordings with searchable transcription output for QA and coaching. Admin controls are practical for service orgs that need repeatable configuration across teams, not one-off local adjustments.
A key tradeoff is that the strongest outcomes depend on correct phone-system integration, so the initial PBX and trunk mapping work determines recording completeness. Retreaver fits when customer support leaders want consistent call logging across multiple queues and want reporting based on the same call metadata used for review.
- +Configurable call logging workflow that links recordings to metadata
- +Searchable speech-to-text output for fast QA and coaching
- +Export-ready call artifacts for review and downstream processing
- +Automation-oriented integration to reduce manual call tagging
- –Recording coverage depends on correct PBX integration mapping
- –Advanced configuration choices add setup steps for smaller teams
- –Transcription quality varies with call conditions and network latency
- –Cross-tool reporting requires deliberate metadata handoff design
Customer support QA leads
Rapid review of specific customer calls
Faster coaching cycles
Contact center operations teams
Consistent logging across queues
Fewer reporting mismatches
Show 2 more scenarios
Revenue operations teams
Call analytics for sales follow-up
More consistent pipeline insights
Use exported call artifacts and metadata to support interaction analytics workflows downstream.
Compliance and training managers
Retention aligned to policy
Tighter retention control
Apply retention rules to stored call artifacts so legal hold processes can reference the call log timeline.
Best for: Fits when service teams need consistent call logging tied to phone infrastructure.
Marchex
enterpriseConversation analytics and call tracking platform for multi-location businesses.
Transcript indexing that supports fast phonetic retrieval across large recording libraries for QA review.
Marchex concentrates on turning recorded calls into searchable transcripts and scored interaction signals, then routing findings into review and coaching workflows. The interface supports QA scorecards tied to review queues, and the transcript index enables phonetic search style retrieval across large volumes. Admin controls cover user access to recordings and analytics views, which matters when QA teams and supervisors share the same datasets. Integration patterns tend to focus on contact center connectivity and downstream reporting rather than DIY call handling features.
A tradeoff appears when advanced automation depends on API-driven workflows or integration engineering rather than fully declarative no-code configuration. Marchex fits best when service operations need repeatable QA review at scale and when search speed through transcript indexing matters more than ad hoc transcript edits. It also fits organizations that already run structured performance measurement and want recordings to feed those programs without manual retrieval.
- +Speech-to-text indexing enables fast transcript and keyword retrieval during QA
- +QA scorecards and review queues support repeatable coaching workflows
- +Interaction analytics connects call content to measurable service outcomes
- +Admin access controls support separation between QA reviewers and supervisors
- –Some automation paths require integration work instead of pure configuration
- –Setup complexity is higher when call handling must align with existing architectures
- –Transcript quality can vary with audio conditions and agent microphone pickup
- –Export and reporting workflows can feel rigid for highly customized dashboards
Contact center QA teams
Route scored calls into QA review queues
More consistent coaching coverage
Service operations leaders
Track performance across campaigns and periods
Clearer improvement focus
Show 2 more scenarios
Revenue operations analysts
Search transcripts for objection themes
Faster insight gathering
Analysts use transcript indexing to find recurring phrasing patterns and validate training changes.
Contact center IT teams
Integrate recording data with existing systems
Lower operational retrieval effort
CTI connector style integration supports pushing recording context into operational reporting flows.
Best for: Fits when service teams need transcript search and QA scorecards tied to structured interaction analytics.
Infinity
enterpriseCall tracking and intelligence platform for enterprise digital marketing attribution.
Provision recording configuration through the Infinity API to standardize capture policies across multiple queues and environments.
Infinity positions call logging around a configurable capture pipeline that maps inbound and outbound interactions to searchable records. Core capabilities include call recording management, transcripts and interaction analytics hooks, and integrations with common telephony and CRM workflows.
Admin controls focus on recording policy configuration and access scoping for teams that handle QA and compliance reviews. The differentiator is the combination of automation-friendly configuration and an API-first surface for provisioning capture settings.
- +Automation-oriented configuration supports fast rollout across teams
- +API surface supports custom provisioning for call logging settings
- +Searchable interaction records with transcript-linked context
- +RBAC-style access scoping helps separate QA and operations workflows
- –Telephony integration requires careful mapping of trunks and routing
- –Advanced capture and indexing workflows depend on setup discipline
Best for: Fits when service teams need governed call logging plus an API for provisioning recording settings.
NICE CXone
enterpriseCloud contact center platform with call recording, logging, and analytics capabilities.
Unified interaction logging that links agent actions, QA outcomes, and interaction analytics in a single governed history.
NICE CXone logs calls by combining voice capture, interaction indexing, and workflow execution for contact-center teams. Admins can connect it to telephony through PBX integration paths and CTI connector components, then route interactions into reporting, QA, and compliance workflows.
Configuration supports operational guardrails like user roles and audit visibility across supervisors, analysts, and agents. NICE CXone also exposes extensibility through documented integrations so call-log events can feed downstream analytics and ticketing systems.
- +Interaction history ties recordings, transcripts, and workflow outcomes to one log record
- +CTI connector and PBX integration options fit enterprise contact-center telephony setups
- +RBAC and audit log coverage supports supervisor governance of call logs
- +Automation rules can assign QA and route exceptions based on interaction attributes
- –Initial configuration can be heavy when multiple queues and routing rules must match
- –Deep analytics and indexing rely on correct capture formats and metadata alignment
- –Some call-log customizations depend on integration work rather than UI switches
- –Cross-system reporting needs disciplined event mapping across tools
Best for: Fits when large service teams need governed call logs tied to QA, compliance, and automated routing.
Verint
enterpriseCustomer engagement and call analytics platform with recording, logging, and workforce optimization.
Governance-focused interaction audit trail that ties recording access and retention handling to administrator controls.
Verint fits service organizations that need call logging tied to broader contact center analytics and governance. It supports interaction capture workflows that feed reporting on agent performance, QA signals, and operational trends.
Verint also emphasizes administration, integration options, and auditability across large deployments. Call-log data can be retained, searched, and exported in formats that downstream systems can consume.
- +Strong governance and audit controls for interaction and recording artifacts
- +Integration options designed for contact center ecosystems and workflows
- +Search and reporting paths for operational and QA-focused teams
- +Extensibility options for connecting call-log data to analytics stacks
- –Complex configuration when aligning capture rules across multiple call paths
- –Higher admin overhead for permissioning and retention policy management
- –Implementation timelines tend to increase for multi-site deployments
- –Workflow automation depends on built-in scripts or integration layers
Best for: Fits when service teams need governed call logging that feeds QA and analytics across many sites.
Gong
enterpriseRevenue intelligence platform that captures, logs, and analyzes customer calls for sales teams.
Gong’s QA review workspace turns logged interactions into searchable transcript reviews with clip-level collaboration.
Gong is distinct in call logging by coupling recordings with review workflows for sales coaching and QA, not only storing audio and metadata. It captures interaction analytics and generates searchable transcripts that teams can tag, score, and route for follow-up.
Gong also provides integration points for CRM and team collaboration so logged calls can be used in downstream reporting and governance. Admin controls focus on managing access to recordings, transcript visibility, and workspace review activity.
- +Transcript indexing supports QA review workflows and fast clip-based sharing
- +Interaction analytics connect call outcomes to sales conversations and coaching
- +Strong extensibility via integrations that move logged calls into CRM context
- +Access controls cover recording and transcript visibility for review teams
- –Deeper call-capture coverage can depend on specific telephony integrations
- –Review configuration for scorecards and routing can take governance effort
- –Advanced reporting relies on adopted tagging practices to stay meaningful
- –Transcription quality varies with call audio conditions and network noise
Best for: Fits when service and revenue teams need call logging tied to transcript indexing, QA scorecards, and CRM-linked coaching.
Jiminny
SMBConversation intelligence and call logging platform for revenue teams.
Review program automation that ties call-level transcript signals to QA queues and scorecards.
Jiminny focuses on turning call recordings and transcripts into QA-ready interaction analytics for service teams. It builds an automation workflow around call lifecycle tasks like tagging, scorecarding, and routing insights to reviewers.
Admin controls center on configuration governance for review programs and role-based access to shared projects. Extensibility relies on an API surface that supports pulling interaction data into external reporting and operational tooling.
- +QA scorecards connect directly to call-level context and transcripts
- +Automation rules reduce manual tagging and review queue management
- +API supports exporting interaction analytics into external systems
- +Shared review programs keep large teams aligned on evaluation criteria
- –Advanced workflows require careful configuration of tagging and review rules
- –Deep PBX-level recording controls depend on upstream call capture setup
- –Custom analytics reports can take time to model end-to-end
- –High-volume indexing increases operational overhead for data retention policies
Best for: Fits when service teams need scorecards plus automation that can sync interaction insights to other tools.
Aircall
SMBCloud-based phone system with call logging, recording, and analytics for sales and support teams.
Event and API integration that keeps call logs synchronized with downstream CRM, ticketing, and analytics tools.
Aircall captures call metadata and records calls through telephony integrations to support call logging and interaction review. It pairs a PBX-style phone system experience with call lists, search, and tagging workflows that route interactions into QA and analytics streams.
Aircall also offers API access for automation and reporting, plus webhook-style event delivery for near real-time synchronization. For teams that need logs aligned to sales or support workflows, Aircall’s strength is mapping call activity to external systems via integration points rather than manual spreadsheets.
- +API access for syncing call logs and metadata into other systems
- +Strong call search and filtering for audit-friendly interaction review
- +Tagging and workflow alignment for sales and support triage
- +Event-driven integration options for keeping CRMs updated
- –Recording and retention behavior depends on integration configuration choices
- –Quality-assurance scoring depends on external analytics layers in many setups
- –Advanced governance like audit log depth can feel limited versus enterprise suites
- –Deep telephony edge cases can require vendor and carrier alignment
Best for: Fits when service teams need call logs tied to CRM workflows with API and event-based sync.
PhoneBurner
SMBPower dialer and call logging platform for outbound sales teams.
Post-call automation that writes dispositions and notes back into the calling workflow so history stays consistent.
PhoneBurner is a call logging and outbound calling workflow tool that focuses on capturing call activity tied to agents, leads, and follow-ups. It provides configurable call dispositions, notes, and tagging so teams can keep CRM-like history without manual spreadsheets.
PhoneBurner also supports telephony integrations for call events and logging, plus automation for updating records after interactions. It is best suited to service teams that need consistent call records and follow-up hygiene more than deep voice recording analytics.
- +Call dispositions, notes, and tags keep logged outcomes consistent across agents
- +Automation updates call records after interactions without manual data entry
- +Clear workflows for lead or contact call history reduce missed follow-ups
- +Admin-facing configuration is straightforward for day-to-day operational control
- –Limited visibility for recording-centric QA workflows compared with recording first platforms
- –Integration depth varies by telephony environment and may require setup effort
- –Audit depth for call edits and disposition changes is not a primary strength
- –Advanced analytics like speech scoring and phonetic search are not central
Best for: Fits when service teams need reliable call logging and follow-up automation tied to agents and contacts.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 customer experience in industry, Salesloft stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right call loggin software
Call loggin software for service teams captures call outcomes, recordings, and transcripts, then turns those artifacts into searchable interaction histories for QA and follow-up. This guide covers Salesloft, Retreaver, Marchex, Infinity, NICE CXone, Verint, Gong, Jiminny, Aircall, and PhoneBurner.
Across these tools, the differentiators show up in how call capture links to metadata, how transcripts are indexed for fast review, and how workflow automation syncs outcomes into CRM or QA queues. Managers and admins also see meaningful differences in provisioning and governance controls, especially in Infinity, NICE CXone, and Verint.
Call loggin software for service teams that standardizes capture, QA indexing, and workflow sync
Call loggin software records interactions and attaches structured call metadata so teams can review outcomes and build repeatable QA workflows. Salesloft ties logged call outcomes into CRM-linked activity history, while Retreaver keeps searchable transcription indexing attached to call log metadata for rapid QA navigation.
Beyond storage, the key capability is how reliably the system keeps recordings, transcripts, and dispositions connected to the right agent and queue. Tools like Infinity emphasize provisioning recording configuration through an API to standardize capture policies across queues, while NICE CXone focuses on unified interaction logging that links agent actions, QA outcomes, and interaction analytics in a single governed history.
Call logging requirements that determine QA searchability and workflow control
The core requirement is that logged interactions keep recordings, transcripts, dispositions, and outcomes attached to the same call record so QA review does not break when teams filter by agent, queue, or campaign. Across these tools, the differences show up in how transcripts become indexable artifacts, how call outcomes map into existing CRM or QA workflows, and how much governance the admin can enforce across routing paths and queues.
Transcript indexing tied to call metadata for review speed
Retreaver provides searchable transcription indexing that stays attached to call log metadata, and Marchex adds phonetic retrieval across large transcript libraries for structured QA review queues.
Governed interaction logging that unifies agent actions and QA outcomes
NICE CXone links agent actions, QA outcomes, and interaction analytics into a single governed interaction history, and Verint adds a governance-focused audit trail that ties recording access and retention handling to admin controls.
CRM-linked activity association for managers and reps
Salesloft syncs call outcomes into CRM-linked activity history and uses Sequence context to reduce missed follow-up after calls, while Aircall centers API-driven call-log synchronization to downstream CRM and ticketing workflows.
API-driven provisioning of recording configuration across environments
Infinity supports provisioning recording configuration through the Infinity API to standardize capture policies across multiple queues and environments, and it pairs that API rollout with workflow automation and indexing setup that requires disciplined configuration.
Search and collaboration primitives for transcript-based QA
Gong turns logged interactions into a QA review workspace with searchable transcript reviews and clip-level collaboration, while Jiminny automates review program flows by tying call-level transcript signals to QA queues and scorecards.
Post-call automation that keeps dispositions and notes consistent
PhoneBurner writes dispositions, notes, and tags back into the calling workflow so logged outcomes stay consistent across agents, while Jiminny’s automation rules reduce manual tagging and review queue management for scorecards.
Choose by integration depth, governance needs, and where automation should run
Call logging selection should start with where the integration truth lives, because some platforms act as the orchestration layer for logging, while others depend on correct upstream telephony mapping to deliver recording coverage and consistent metadata. The next filter should be governance depth, since Infinity and NICE CXone emphasize standardized capture configuration and governed history, while Retreaver and Marchex lean more toward transcript indexing and QA navigation tied to call record metadata.
Decide whether call logging must follow CRM activity history or act as the QA system of record
If logged outcomes must drive CRM-linked rep workflows, Salesloft ties call outcomes into CRM-linked activity history and Sequence context, and Aircall uses API access to keep call logs synchronized into downstream CRM and analytics tools. If QA review should stay centered on indexable transcript artifacts, Retreaver keeps speech-to-text output searchable with call-log metadata and Marchex supports phonetic retrieval across transcript libraries.
Match governance requirements to admin controls and audit needs
For governed interaction logging that ties agent actions, QA outcomes, and interaction analytics into a single governed history, NICE CXone is built around unified interaction logging plus CTI connector and PBX integration options. For audit trail emphasis on recording access and retention handling, Verint ties governance and audit controls to interaction and recording artifacts, which increases admin overhead.
Select tools that fit the provisioning model for recording capture policies
If standardizing capture policies across multiple queues and environments requires automation, Infinity provisions recording configuration through the Infinity API so recording settings can be rolled out consistently. If the telephony environment already maps cleanly and teams focus on fast QA navigation, Retreaver’s configurable call logging workflow and transcript indexing can reduce the need for heavy routing-policy setup.
Confirm that review workflows match clip-level collaboration or queue automation
If review needs transcript search plus clip-level collaboration for sharing and QA sessions, Gong provides clip-based collaboration in its QA review workspace. If teams want automated scorecard routing based on call-level transcript signals, Jiminny connects scorecards and call context with automation rules that reduce manual review queue management.
Define recording coverage risk tolerance based on telephony mapping complexity
If recording coverage depends heavily on correct PBX integration mapping, Retreaver flags that coverage depends on correct PBX integration mapping and that advanced configuration adds setup steps for smaller teams. If recording and analytics depend on metadata alignment and capture formats, NICE CXone warns that deep analytics and indexing rely on correct capture formats and metadata alignment.
Who benefits from call loggin software for service teams
Service teams that run repeatable QA programs need call logging that keeps transcripts, recordings, and dispositions connected to the same call record so review queues can be filtered and coached consistently. The strongest fit depends on whether teams prioritize governed interaction history, transcript-first QA navigation, or CRM-synchronized follow-up automation.
Service operations and QA managers managing large review queues
NICE CXone and Verint provide governed histories and audit controls that support consistent QA and compliance handling, while Marchex adds transcript indexing and QA scorecards to support repeatable coaching workflows.
Service and sales teams running call-to-CRM follow-up processes
Salesloft keeps call outcomes in CRM-linked activity history and uses Sequence context to reduce missed follow-up, and Aircall provides API-driven event and metadata sync for CRM and ticketing workflows.
Administrators standardizing recording capture policies across multiple queues
Infinity supports API-driven provisioning of recording configuration for governed capture rollout, while NICE CXone requires careful initial configuration when multiple queues and routing rules must match.
Customer support teams that need collaboration around specific moments in calls
Gong provides clip-level transcript collaboration in its QA review workspace, and Retreaver provides fast QA navigation by keeping searchable speech-to-text output attached to call log metadata.
Teams scaling scorecards with minimal manual tagging
Jiminny automates review program workflows by tying transcript signals to QA queues and scorecards, while PhoneBurner focuses on post-call dispositions and notes automation that keeps logged outcomes consistent across agents.
Common call logging mistakes that break QA workflows
Teams often assume that recordings and transcripts will stay correctly associated with agent, queue, and call metadata, but multiple tools emphasize that correct telephony integration setup or mapping is the difference between usable QA search and empty review gaps. Other failures come from configuring review scorecards without validating how routing rules and metadata alignment impact which interactions land in QA queues.
Buying for transcript search without validating recording coverage from telephony mapping
Retreaver ties recording coverage to correct PBX integration mapping, and NICE CXone warns that deep analytics and indexing rely on correct capture formats and metadata alignment.
Treating governance as an afterthought while relying on complex routing rules
NICE CXone can require heavy initial configuration when multiple queues and routing rules must match, and Verint increases admin overhead for permissioning and retention policy management.
Configuring QA scorecards without aligning them to how interaction history records outcomes
Gong flags that review configuration for scorecards and routing can take governance effort, and Marchex notes that some automation paths require integration work instead of pure configuration.
Assuming automation will happen without provisioning discipline
Infinity’s advanced capture and indexing workflows depend on setup discipline even with API-driven provisioning, and Salesloft notes that call capture quality depends on telephony integration setup.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Salesloft, Retreaver, Marchex, Infinity, NICE CXone, Verint, Gong, Jiminny, Aircall, and PhoneBurner using feature depth at 40%, ease of getting to usable call logs at 30%, and value at 30%. We weighted integration depth and automation surface because call logs only stay actionable when outcomes sync into CRM-linked activity history or QA queue workflows.
We also prioritized how transcripts become indexable artifacts for fast QA navigation and how governed history links recordings, transcripts, and workflow outcomes to the right interaction record. Salesloft earned the top rank by pairing Sequence and CRM-linked activity history for actionable call outcomes with transcript indexing that supports searchable QA review workflows.
Frequently Asked Questions About call loggin software
Which call logging products support programmable capture provisioning through an API?
How should a service team decide between CRM-tied call logging and pure recording storage?
What breaks if call logs need to be audit-ready for access and retention governance?
When is a transcript indexing workflow more effective than basic call tagging?
Which products provide extensibility so call-log events can feed downstream ticketing or analytics?
How do SSO and RBAC expectations affect tool fit for large service organizations?
What data migration tasks come up when moving from call recording storage to governed call logging?
How should teams evaluate automation hooks for QA workflows instead of manual review steps?
Which tools are better suited for side-by-side comparison of agent actions, QA outcomes, and interaction analytics?
Where does call logging fall short when service teams only need follow-up hygiene and call dispositions?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
- Top 10 Best Chat Support Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Chat Customer Service Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Cards Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Card Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Card Management Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Canadian CRM Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Campus Management Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Cam Monitoring Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Calls Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Calling Recording Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Calling Card Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Calling Center Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Caller Tracker Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Caller Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Caller Information Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Callback Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Call Tracking And Recording Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Call Taking Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Call Support Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Call Software of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Customer Experience In Industry alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of customer experience in industry tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare customer experience in industry tools→