
GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Education LearningTop 10 Best Book Notes Software of 2026
Top 10 book notes software ranked for fast note capture and retrieval, comparing Notion, Obsidian, Evernote, and more for study workflows.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Obsidian is the best pick if you want long-term, portable book notes in plain Markdown that link across many reading sessions, whereas Evernote is a stronger alternative when OCR-heavy capture of book artifacts and reliable cross-notebook search matter most.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Obsidian
Bidirectional links between Markdown notes turn each quote and summary into an automatically navigable web.
Built for fits when long-term book notes must stay portable and linkable across many reading sessions..
Roam Research
Editor pickBidirectional linking between blocks and pages updates both sides automatically during edits.
Built for fits when individual research and writing rely on linked atomic notes and fast retrieval..
Logseq
Editor pickGraph navigation updates continuously from bidirectional links and block structure.
Built for fits when writers want local-first, graph-linked book notes that stay editable in plain Markdown..
Comparison Table
Obsidian
specialistObsidian is a local Markdown notes app with graph view and plugin ecosystem.
Bidirectional links between Markdown notes turn each quote and summary into an automatically navigable web.
Obsidian uses a folder-based vault with plain Markdown files, so notes remain editable outside the app and versionable in standard tooling. For book work, backlinks and linked reading references make it easy to trace a quote to every place it was used in later summaries. Full-text search spans the vault, so retrieval does not depend on prebuilt tags or a database layer.
The main tradeoff is that retrieval quality depends on link habits and folder conventions, because there is no built-in reading assistant that auto-creates literature-style citations. Obsidian works best when book notes evolve into a personal Zettelkasten style network, where literature notes are cross-referenced over time.
- +Local-first Markdown vault keeps notes portable and versionable
- +Backlinks and transclusion-style embeds connect quotes to summaries
- +Templates speed repeatable chapter and literature note formats
- +Full-text search retrieves across the entire vault quickly
- –Consistent retrieval requires disciplined linking and note structure
- –Some citation workflows need plugins to match literature export expectations
Solo researchers
Cross-book citation tracking
Faster thematic synthesis
Grad students
Literature note network building
Cleaner review drafts
Show 1 more scenario
Knowledge workers
Chapter summaries with retrieval
Less time revisiting PDFs
Search and linked headings surface the right section from a summary months later.
Best for: Fits when long-term book notes must stay portable and linkable across many reading sessions.
Roam Research
specialistRoam Research is a networked thought tool for backlinked notes including book annotations.
Bidirectional linking between blocks and pages updates both sides automatically during edits.
Roam Research organizes content as blocks connected by links, which makes literature-style notes and summaries easy to reshape without flattening into linear documents. Bidirectional links update both ends when targets change, so citations, definitions, and claims stay navigable as the knowledge graph grows. The editor supports transclusion-like embeds through block references, which helps reading notes roll into larger outlines without manual duplication. Full-text search and graph navigation support fast retrieval when questions map to earlier claims.
A tradeoff appears in governance and consistency, because ad hoc linking and block reuse can create duplicated concepts unless naming conventions are enforced. Roam works best when the writing workflow already centers on atomic notes and incremental synthesis, such as research journaling that turns reading highlights into reusable blocks. It also suits teams that standardize a small set of templates for meeting notes and project decision records.
- +Bidirectional links keep claims and references synchronized across the graph
- +Block-based editor supports atomic notes and fast refactoring
- +Graph navigation accelerates retrieval when notes are linked by intent
- +Markdown export supports long-term portability for page content
- –Graph growth can create concept duplicates without linking discipline
- –Complex views require learning multiple navigation patterns
- –Admin controls for multi-user governance are limited compared to enterprise wiki tools
- –Automation hinges on the public API and community integrations, not native workflows for every step
Academic researchers
Synthesize reading into claim-focused notes
Faster literature synthesis
Technical writers
Build documentation from reusable sections
Less duplicated writing
Show 2 more scenarios
Solo knowledge workers
Maintain a daily decision journal
Quicker next-step decisions
Link meeting outcomes to tasks and context so follow-ups surface immediately.
Content teams
Maintain shared research libraries
Lower rework across cycles
Use templates and consistent linking to keep shared notes navigable across projects.
Best for: Fits when individual research and writing rely on linked atomic notes and fast retrieval.
Logseq
specialistLogseq is an open-source local knowledge graph for outlined notes and highlights.
Graph navigation updates continuously from bidirectional links and block structure.
Logseq stores notes locally and uses sync to move them across devices, which fits readers who want control over where the data lives. The editing model is block-based, so annotations, highlights, and reading reflections can attach to specific text chunks rather than only to whole pages. Bidirectional links and backlinks update based on link targets, which supports Zettelkasten-style development through networked pages. Markdown output and block-level exports fit literature-note workflows that need portability outside the editor.
The main tradeoff is operational friction around sync consistency and manual conflict handling when multiple devices update the same content. Another constraint is that advanced publishing formats such as EPUB or PDF parsing depend on external steps rather than native, annotation-to-citation pipelines. Logseq works best when the reading process stays inside text-first workflows, such as nightly literature notes and daily retrieval through graph and search.
- +Local-first storage keeps note content accessible offline.
- +Block-level editing makes atomic notes practical for literature annotations.
- +Bidirectional linking with backlinks supports networked recall.
- +Markdown export and interoperable text files improve portability.
- –Sync conflicts require manual resolution when edits collide.
- –Advanced reference metadata workflows need extra setup or tools.
Independent researchers
Track reading notes by linked arguments
Faster synthesis sessions
Knowledge workers
Maintain permanent notes from highlights
Cleaner retrieval habits
Show 1 more scenario
Writers
Draft outlines from note networks
Less retyping
Transclusion-style inclusion and cross-links build outlines from existing note blocks.
Best for: Fits when writers want local-first, graph-linked book notes that stay editable in plain Markdown.
Readwise
specialistReadwise resurfaces highlights from ebooks, articles, and notes via spaced repetition.
Highlight-to-review scheduling that attaches resurfacing prompts to reading progress, so notes return in context.
Readwise turns book highlights and notes into a review feed by attaching them to resurfacing prompts and reading progress tracking. It supports book notes imports from common highlight workflows and exports citations and highlights for downstream writing.
The core value comes from aggregation and review scheduling rather than authoring a full knowledge graph with bidirectional links. Readwise also provides integration surfaces that help move extracted text and notes into other tools via export and supported connectors.
- +Resurfacing prompts convert highlights into scheduled review sessions
- +Import pathways reduce friction when collecting notes from existing reading
- +Citation and highlight export supports reuse in writing workflows
- +Reading progress tracking ties review cadence to ongoing books
- –Native note authoring is narrower than Notion or Obsidian workflows
- –Backlink-style link graph building is not the primary design focus
- –OCR text extraction quality varies by scan type and layout
- –Export formatting can require cleanup for highly structured pipelines
Best for: Fits when highlights must feed a recurring review routine and exports drive writing, not when building a full linked-note system.
Evernote
enterpriseEvernote is a notes app with clipping and document scanning for capturing book content.
Document OCR for book pages and PDFs that remains searchable after sync and export.
Evernote captures book study notes with a web clipper, OCR on images and PDFs, and fast full-text search across notebooks. It supports highlights, annotations, and citation-style exporting workflows, so reading artifacts can be turned into reusable notes.
The storage model is document-first with tagging and nested notebooks, which fits reading records and long-form research files. Sync handles conflicts at the note level, but it lacks the graph-first linking and atomic-note ergonomics seen in systems built around bidirectional links.
- +OCR extracts searchable text from scanned book pages and PDFs
- +Web clipper captures full web pages with readable formatting
- +Nested notebooks plus tags keeps large reading libraries navigable
- +Export to Markdown and other formats supports offboarding workflows
- –Bidirectional linking and backlinks are not core knowledge-graph features
- –Advanced automation relies more on integrations than native workflows
Best for: Fits when reading artifacts need OCR, highlighting capture, and reliable search across many notebooks.
GoodNotes
specialistGoodNotes is a digital handwriting notebook for annotating PDFs and ebooks.
Pen-first PDF annotation with page-anchored highlights and handwritten markup inside nested notebooks.
GoodNotes is tailored to capture marginalia directly on PDFs, so highlights and handwriting stay attached to the exact page region.
Book notes are organized through notebooks, nested notebooks, and tags, which supports consistent retrieval when a clear taxonomy is maintained.
Export and sharing options move notes out of the app, but the product does not center on Markdown-based knowledge graph linking.
Search helps locate notes and marked content, while advanced automation for ingestion and linking is limited versus developer-driven note systems.
- +High-fidelity PDF annotation with pen, highlight, and organized page-based markup
- +Nested notebooks and tagging make source-linked book notes easier to categorize
- +Handwritten and typed note creation supports mixed Zettelkasten-style literature notes
- +Exports and sharing workflows support moving notes into broader documentation processes
- –Limited bidirectional linking and backlink-style navigation compared with dedicated knowledge graph tools
- –Book-level retrieval depends on search and organization setup more than atomic-note workflows
- –Automation and API access are constrained for large-scale ingestion and enrichment
- –OCR text extraction quality can vary by scan clarity and document layout
Best for: Fits when reading-heavy note taking needs accurate PDF marginalia and reliable cross-device access.
Basmo
vertical specialistBasmo is a book tracking app with note-taking and reading stats features.
Excerpt-first notes with source-linked context for faster book passage retrieval during synthesis.
Basmo is a book-notes workspace built around reading, highlighting, and turning excerpts into structured notes. It centers on fast capture from reading sources and then organizes notes with citation-like metadata so retrieval stays tied to the original text.
Basmo also supports exports for downstream writing and knowledge workflows, rather than locking notes into a single view. Automation and integration surfaces focus on keeping the note lifecycle connected to what was read, rather than only tagging and manual reformatting.
- +Reading-to-note flow keeps notes anchored to specific book excerpts
- +Export paths support moving citations and notes into external writing workflows
- +Organized collections make it easier to track progress across multiple books
- +Search returns relevant passages based on how notes were captured
- –Limited evidence of deep bidirectional link graphs compared with note-linking-first tools
- –Some advanced organization requires manual cleanup after bulk imports
- –Automation and API depth appears narrower than developer-focused knowledge tools
- –OCR and PDF annotation workflows can be uneven for scanned or low-quality pages
Best for: Fits when book-centric workflows need quick excerpt capture and citation-style retrieval.
Hypothesis
specialistHypothesis is an open annotation layer for web pages and PDFs.
Annotation anchors that attach comments and highlights to exact text ranges across web content and PDFs.
Hypothesis is a web annotation system that turns PDFs and web pages into shareable marginalia tied to stable targets. It supports highlights, comments, and tag-based moderation across a library of linked sources.
For book notes workflows, it fits when reading happens in the browser and when retrieval depends on searching annotations tied to the original text locations. Its core capability is an annotation layer with exports and a governance model for teams who want consistent review and attribution.
- +Per-text annotations with reliable anchoring to the original passage
- +Team and group governance controls for who can view and moderate
- +Exportable highlights and comments for downstream notes aggregation
- +Bidirectional linking between annotations and the annotated source context
- –Book-note workflows can feel indirect without a full note database
- –Advanced knowledge-graph behaviors require external tooling for graph modeling
- –PDF annotation coverage can vary by document layout and text extraction quality
- –Annotation density can slow retrieval if search filters are not managed
Best for: Fits when marginalia-driven reading needs shared retrieval and moderated team annotation workflows.
Anki
specialistAnki is an open-source spaced repetition flashcard program for memorizing book content.
Spaced repetition scheduling that turns each note field into timed review cards, with templates controlling question generation.
Anki turns book notes into spaced repetition through flashcards driven by review scheduling. Notes can be imported from Markdown and exported for portability, with attachment-style material stored alongside cards.
It supports a local-first workflow with sync for study data, while retrieval depends on Anki’s review engine rather than a writing-first document model. Power users extend behavior using add-ons and templates for card creation from your note fields.
- +Spaced repetition scheduling converts reading notes into recurring reviews.
- +Custom card templates map note fields to front and back content.
- +Add-ons expand import, media handling, and workflow automation.
- +Local-first study data works offline with later sync to other devices.
- –Book note retrieval depends on review scheduling, not document search views.
- –Card modeling takes time when converting longform notes into atomic prompts.
- –Bidirectional linking and graph-style navigation require add-ons and setup discipline.
- –PDF annotation and OCR workflows are limited compared with annotation-first tools.
Best for: Fits when book notes must turn into scheduled review prompts with repeatable templates.
Kortext
enterpriseKortext is a digital textbook platform with annotation and note tools.
Citation export generated from annotated reading context, keeping references aligned to the passages that produced them.
Kortext serves book-centric learning and research workflows with a reading environment built around annotations, highlights, and note capture on published e-content. It supports collection-style organization so notes can stay attached to specific titles and passages rather than living as detached snippets. Kortext also offers exportable citation outputs and text extraction so written notes can be moved into downstream documents and tools.
- +Notes stay tied to book passages inside the reader
- +Citation export covers common reference workflows
- +Text extraction turns annotated content into usable text
- +Collection organization works for multi-title study
- –Graph-style linking across notes is limited versus wiki tools
- –Automation and API depth are not the primary focus
- –OCR quality depends on source scan clarity
- –Advanced tagging taxonomies take setup discipline
Best for: Fits when reading and note capture must stay anchored to passages across multiple assigned titles.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 education learning, Obsidian stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right book notes software
Book notes software organizes reading artifacts like highlights, excerpts, and marginalia so they can be retrieved when writing, review, or synthesis starts. This guide covers Obsidian, Roam Research, Logseq, Readwise, Evernote, GoodNotes, Basmo, Hypothesis, Anki, and Kortext, with special attention to fast note-taking and retrieval during active reading.
The comparisons focus on how each tool links notes back to sources, how it handles recall from highlights versus documents, and how its automation and API surface supports repeated workflows. Obsidian and Roam Research lead on bidirectional link behavior for quote-to-summary navigation, while Readwise focuses on highlight-to-review scheduling that returns notes in context.
Book notes software that captures reading annotations and retrieves them fast
Book notes software captures and structures reading annotations like highlights, excerpts, and page-anchored comments so later retrieval returns the exact passage context. Tools like Obsidian build navigable note pathways through bidirectional links between Markdown notes, so summaries and quotes stay connected as notes evolve.
In document-centric capture workflows, Evernote emphasizes OCR for searchable text from scanned pages and PDFs, while GoodNotes centers pen-first PDF annotation with page-anchored highlights inside nested notebooks. For recurring recall, Readwise converts highlights into resurfacing prompts tied to reading progress, while Anki turns note fields into scheduled review cards that drive retrieval through the review queue.
Fast retrieval mechanisms for book notes, highlights, and excerpts
Fast retrieval depends on how a tool ties each quote, excerpt, or annotation back to the passage it came from and then keeps that relationship navigable after edits. This category rewards tools that treat linking and passage anchoring as first-class behaviors, not manual tagging alone.
Bidirectional navigation from quotes to summaries
Obsidian uses bidirectional links between Markdown notes so quotes and summaries stay mutually navigable as writing evolves. Roam Research updates both sides of bidirectional block-to-page relationships during edits for synchronized reference trails.
Block-level graph editing for atomic book notes
Logseq’s block-based editor makes atomic notes practical for literature annotations and keeps graph navigation continuously updated from links. Roam Research also treats blocks as the unit of linking so refactoring claims across a reading graph stays consistent.
Resurfacing loops built from reading progress
Readwise attaches resurfacing prompts to highlight activity so notes return in the same context that produced them. Anki turns each note field into timed review cards so retrieval happens through the review queue rather than document search views.
Document capture with OCR and search
Evernote emphasizes OCR for book pages and PDFs so extracted text remains searchable after sync and export. Evernote also uses a web clipper capture path that preserves readable formatting so captured material becomes searchable alongside notebook notes.
Page-anchored PDF annotation for marginalia
GoodNotes supports pen-first PDF annotation with page-anchored highlights and handwritten markup inside nested notebooks. GoodNotes makes book-like marginalia easier to organize by combining nested notebooks with tagging.
Passage-anchored citations and excerpt-first capture
Basmo uses excerpt-first notes so each capture stays anchored to a specific book passage for faster retrieval during synthesis. Kortext keeps notes tied to book passages across assigned titles and generates citation export aligned to those passage contexts.
Text-range annotation and team moderation
Hypothesis attaches annotations to exact text ranges across web content and PDFs so a comment remains linked to the original passage. Hypothesis also includes team and group governance controls for who can view and moderate annotations.
Choose by retrieval path and the unit that becomes your searchable source
The key decision is whether retrieval should come from link-driven navigation, from a scheduled review loop, or from passage-anchored document artifacts. Each path pushes the workflow toward a different data shape, such as Markdown vault notes, block graphs, or page-anchored highlights and OCR text.
Pick link-first navigation when quotes must route directly to evolving summaries
Choose Obsidian when long-term book notes should remain portable and versionable in a local-first Markdown vault with Backlinks navigation. Choose Roam Research when bidirectional linking must update across blocks and pages during edits to keep claims synchronized.
Pick block-graph authoring when atomic notes are the writing substrate
Choose Logseq when literature annotations must stay editable at the block level in a local-first graph that continuously reflects bidirectional links. Choose Roam Research instead when the editing workflow needs bidirectional block and page behaviors to remain synchronized as the graph grows.
Pick resurfacing scheduling when highlight recall must return in reading context
Choose Readwise when highlight capture must feed resurfacing prompts tied to reading progress so recall aligns with what was highlighted. Choose Anki when retrieval must be driven by spaced repetition scheduling from note fields into review cards with templates.
Pick document capture tools when searchable text must come from PDFs and scans
Choose Evernote when scanned book pages and PDFs need OCR so extracted text becomes searchable after sync and export. Avoid OCR-heavy workflows for knowledge-graph navigation needs and instead choose Obsidian, Roam Research, or Logseq when link-based routing matters more than document search.
Pick annotation-first tools when marginalia and passage anchoring are the priority
Choose GoodNotes when pen-first PDF annotation with page-anchored highlights and handwritten markup must remain accurate across devices. Choose Hypothesis when annotations need precise text-range anchoring on web content and PDFs with team moderation controls.
Pick excerpt-first capture when citations must stay bound to passages during synthesis
Choose Basmo when faster book passage retrieval depends on excerpt-first notes with source-linked context. Choose Kortext when reading across multiple assigned titles must keep citations exported from annotated passage contexts while limiting graph-style linking.
Who book notes software serves best
Book notes software fits different reading-to-writing workflows depending on whether notes become a navigable link graph, a scheduled recall system, or a passage-anchored document archive. The best fit depends on the unit of meaning, such as Markdown notes, blocks, highlights, review cards, or page-anchored annotations.
Writers who want quote-to-summary navigation that stays consistent as notes evolve
Obsidian supports bidirectional links that make summaries and quotes mutually navigable inside a local-first Markdown vault. Roam Research keeps bidirectional block-to-page links synchronized during edits.
Researchers who refactor ideas through atomic blocks and linked references
Logseq’s block-level editor makes atomic notes practical for literature annotations while graph navigation updates continuously from bidirectional links. Roam Research provides block-based bidirectional links that keep claims and references synchronized across the graph.
Readers who want highlight recall driven by recurring review sessions
Readwise turns highlights into resurfacing prompts tied to reading progress so notes return in the same context that produced them. Anki converts note fields into scheduled review cards so retrieval is governed by spaced repetition templates.
People who annotate PDFs, scans, and web reading artifacts as primary sources
Evernote emphasizes OCR for book pages and PDFs so extracted text stays searchable after sync and export. GoodNotes supports pen-first PDF annotation with page-anchored highlights and handwritten markup.
Teams that need passage-anchored annotations with governance controls
Hypothesis attaches annotations to exact text ranges across web content and PDFs for moderated team annotation workflows. Hypothesis keeps annotation anchoring tied to original passages rather than relying only on note links.
Common setup and workflow mistakes that slow down retrieval
Retrieval often fails when the capture method and the retrieval mechanism do not match each other. These tools reward disciplined structure, especially when note meaning depends on linking behavior, passage anchoring, or review scheduling.
Using link-first tools without enforcing a consistent linking and note structure approach
Obsidian can produce fast navigation only when quotes and summaries follow disciplined linking and note organization. Roam Research can create concept duplicates when graph growth is not managed through linking discipline.
Treating local-first graphs as a free-form dumping ground
Logseq’s local-first storage keeps content accessible offline, but sync conflicts still require manual resolution when edits collide. Logseq and Roam Research both demand governance over how blocks and links represent the same idea.
Relying on search when the workflow is actually review-queue based
Anki retrieval depends on review scheduling, so longform book note search is not the primary mechanism. Readwise retrieval returns through resurfacing prompts tied to reading progress, so expecting knowledge-graph navigation as the main path leads to friction.
Capturing scans and PDFs without aligning capture type to the tool’s extraction capabilities
Evernote works best when OCR is the intended bridge from scanned pages and PDFs into searchable content. If PDF marginalia accuracy matters more than OCR text, GoodNotes page-anchored pen-first annotation is a better match than general notebook notes.
Exporting citations while losing the passage anchor relationship
Basmo’s excerpt-first capture helps keep notes bound to passages, but bulk imports can require manual cleanup to preserve that anchor. Kortext keeps citation export aligned to annotated passage contexts, so citation workflows should be built around its passage-tied reader flow.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Obsidian, Roam Research, Logseq, Readwise, Evernote, GoodNotes, Basmo, Hypothesis, Anki, and Kortext by weighting features at 40%, ease and value at 30% each. Features favored the concrete retrieval behaviors that make book notes fast to reopen, including bidirectional navigation, block-based linking, resurfacing prompts, OCR search, page-anchored PDF annotation, and passage-anchored citation export.
Ease and value reflected how quickly users can convert reading highlights and excerpts into a retrieval-ready workflow without fighting the tool’s intended data shape. Obsidian ranked first because bidirectional links between Markdown notes turn quote-to-summary relationships into navigable paths while also keeping notes portable in a local-first vault.
Frequently Asked Questions About book notes software
How do Notion, Obsidian, and Evernote differ for fast quote capture and retrieval?
Which tool handles bidirectional linking between notes best for connected book study?
When does a local-first setup matter for book notes stored and edited offline?
What breaks if a workflow depends on graph navigation instead of document search?
How do imports and exports differ when migrating highlights and annotations into a new system?
Which tool offers SSO and admin controls for team annotation governance?
How does OCR and PDF text extraction affect reading-to-notes workflows?
What tradeoff appears when switching from spaced repetition to writing-first book notes?
How do integrations support moving notes into other writing systems without retyping?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
- Top 10 Best Whiteboard Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Whiteboards Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Whiteboard Computer Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best White Label Assessment Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Weekly Planning Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Website Content Writer Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Web Training Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Web Survey Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Web Seminar Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Web Exam Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Web Based Training Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Web Annotation Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Web Accessibility Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Vt Student Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Voice Training Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Voice Activated Word Processing Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Voice Activated Writing Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Vocational School Management Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Vocal Training Software of 2026
- Top 10 Best Vocabulary Software of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Education Learning alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of education learning tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare education learning tools→