GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Technology Digital MediaTop 10 Best Async Software of 2026
Compare the Top 10 Best Async Software picks for workflows, from Figma to Notion and Miro. See the ranking and compare options.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Figma
Auto Layout for responsive components that adapt across screen sizes
Built for product teams creating design systems with collaborative UI prototyping and handoff.
Notion
Relational databases with multiple database views and custom properties
Built for knowledge-driven teams building project trackers and SOP libraries asynchronously.
Miro
Infinite canvas with frames for organizing large-scale workshops and planning boards
Built for product and engineering teams collaborating asynchronously on visual planning.
Related reading
Comparison Table
This comparison table evaluates Async Software against familiar collaboration and planning tools such as Figma, Notion, Miro, Linear, and Jira Software. It focuses on how each option supports workflows for ideation, documentation, visual collaboration, issue tracking, and team execution so readers can map features to real use cases.
| # | Tool | Category | Overall | Features | Ease of Use | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Figma Cloud-based collaborative design and prototyping tool that supports async reviews through comments, version history, and shareable design links. | design collaboration | 9.0/10 | 9.4/10 | 8.7/10 | 8.7/10 |
| 2 | Notion All-in-one workspace for docs, wikis, and project pages that enables async collaboration with comments, mentions, and permissioned sharing. | documentation | 8.3/10 | 8.8/10 | 8.0/10 | 8.1/10 |
| 3 | Miro Online collaborative whiteboard that supports async participation using board sharing, comments, and versioned updates. | visual collaboration | 8.1/10 | 8.8/10 | 8.0/10 | 7.4/10 |
| 4 | Linear Issue and product tracking system with async-friendly workflows using statuses, comments, mentions, and customizable views. | issue tracking | 8.3/10 | 8.5/10 | 8.8/10 | 7.4/10 |
| 5 | Jira Software Project and issue tracking platform that supports async delivery through workflows, comments, approvals, and audit-friendly history. | agile tracking | 8.1/10 | 8.8/10 | 7.7/10 | 7.7/10 |
| 6 | Confluence Team knowledge base for product documentation that enables async collaboration with page comments, change history, and permissions. | knowledge base | 8.2/10 | 8.6/10 | 8.0/10 | 7.7/10 |
| 7 | Trello Kanban board management tool that supports async execution with cards, checklists, due dates, and comment threads. | kanban | 8.4/10 | 8.4/10 | 9.1/10 | 7.6/10 |
| 8 | Slack Team messaging platform that supports async work with searchable channels, threaded conversations, saved file sharing, and notifications. | team messaging | 8.3/10 | 8.7/10 | 8.8/10 | 7.2/10 |
| 9 | Zoom Video meetings and webinar platform that supports async collaboration through recorded sessions, transcripts, and shared replays. | video async | 8.2/10 | 8.6/10 | 8.8/10 | 6.9/10 |
| 10 | Loom Screen and camera recording tool that enables async communication with shareable videos, playback links, and lightweight feedback. | record-and-share | 8.1/10 | 8.2/10 | 8.8/10 | 7.3/10 |
Cloud-based collaborative design and prototyping tool that supports async reviews through comments, version history, and shareable design links.
All-in-one workspace for docs, wikis, and project pages that enables async collaboration with comments, mentions, and permissioned sharing.
Online collaborative whiteboard that supports async participation using board sharing, comments, and versioned updates.
Issue and product tracking system with async-friendly workflows using statuses, comments, mentions, and customizable views.
Project and issue tracking platform that supports async delivery through workflows, comments, approvals, and audit-friendly history.
Team knowledge base for product documentation that enables async collaboration with page comments, change history, and permissions.
Kanban board management tool that supports async execution with cards, checklists, due dates, and comment threads.
Team messaging platform that supports async work with searchable channels, threaded conversations, saved file sharing, and notifications.
Video meetings and webinar platform that supports async collaboration through recorded sessions, transcripts, and shared replays.
Screen and camera recording tool that enables async communication with shareable videos, playback links, and lightweight feedback.
Figma
design collaborationCloud-based collaborative design and prototyping tool that supports async reviews through comments, version history, and shareable design links.
Auto Layout for responsive components that adapt across screen sizes
Figma stands out for real-time collaborative design in a single browser-based workspace. It supports end-to-end UI workflows with vector editing, Auto Layout, components, and interactive prototypes. Design files integrate with developer handoff via inspectable properties, making assets and specs easier to consume. Strong libraries and versioning support consistent systems across projects.
Pros
- Real-time multi-user editing with comments, version history, and file-level organization
- Auto Layout and component properties enable scalable UI systems
- Prototype links and interactive states support fast stakeholder validation
- Developer handoff shows inspectable CSS-style measurements and assets
Cons
- Advanced layout and component setups take practice to avoid brittle structures
- Large files can feel slower when rendering complex frames and interactions
- Handoff workflows still rely on conventions for naming and structure
Best For
Product teams creating design systems with collaborative UI prototyping and handoff
More related reading
Notion
documentationAll-in-one workspace for docs, wikis, and project pages that enables async collaboration with comments, mentions, and permissioned sharing.
Relational databases with multiple database views and custom properties
Notion stands out by combining wiki-style pages, database views, and lightweight task workflows in one workspace. Core capabilities include relational databases, custom properties, templates, and permissions that support team knowledge management and operational tracking. Async collaboration is reinforced with page comments, mentions, and change history so work can be reviewed without real-time meetings. Flexible linking via pages and database relations enables building internal systems like project trackers and SOP libraries.
Pros
- Relational databases with filtered and sorted views support complex async tracking
- Templates and reusable page blocks speed up consistent documentation workflows
- Comments, mentions, and revision history make asynchronous review auditable
Cons
- Advanced database modeling can feel complex for non-technical teams
- Automation and integrations are limited for multi-step workflows without external tools
- Large workspaces can become slow to navigate without strong information architecture
Best For
Knowledge-driven teams building project trackers and SOP libraries asynchronously
Miro
visual collaborationOnline collaborative whiteboard that supports async participation using board sharing, comments, and versioned updates.
Infinite canvas with frames for organizing large-scale workshops and planning boards
Miro stands out with a highly flexible infinite canvas that supports both brainstorming and structured planning. It combines diagramming, whiteboard collaboration, and templates for activities like user story mapping and agile ceremonies. Async work benefits from real-time comments, mentions, and versioned boards that keep stakeholders aligned across time zones.
Pros
- Infinite canvas supports complex planning without strict slide constraints
- Robust sticky notes, frames, and diagram elements enable fast board building
- Commenting and mentions keep async feedback tied to specific objects
- Workflow templates speed setup for mapping, roadmaps, and workshops
- Integrations with common tools help connect boards to existing work
Cons
- Large boards can become slow and harder to navigate
- Advanced diagramming and permissions require more configuration effort
- Exported artifacts can lose fidelity compared with on-canvas layout
- Facilitation tools are less rigorous than dedicated workshop platforms
- Information sprawl is easy on an infinite canvas
Best For
Product and engineering teams collaborating asynchronously on visual planning
More related reading
Linear
issue trackingIssue and product tracking system with async-friendly workflows using statuses, comments, mentions, and customizable views.
Automations for auto-updating issues based on events and rules
Linear stands out for its fast issue-first workflow built around a clean Kanban and list experience. It supports async execution through task comments, status changes, and due dates tied to a lightweight planning model. Real-time collaboration is complemented by automation and integrations that keep engineering work aligned across repos and tools. Strong emphasis on notifications and traceability helps teams review progress without needing constant meetings.
Pros
- Issue-centric Kanban and backlog views streamline day-to-day async execution
- Rich notifications and mentions keep stakeholders informed without constant pings
- Automation and integrations connect work items to engineering activity
- Search and filtering make it practical to audit progress across projects
Cons
- Less suited for non-engineering work that needs complex approvals
- Permission and workflow customization can feel limiting for advanced processes
- Reporting depth is weaker than dedicated project portfolio tools
Best For
Engineering teams running async product and delivery work with a visual board
Jira Software
agile trackingProject and issue tracking platform that supports async delivery through workflows, comments, approvals, and audit-friendly history.
Workflow Builder with validators, conditions, and post-functions for enforcing process rules
Jira Software stands out for its deep configuration of issue types, workflows, and board views that map to software delivery practices. Teams use Scrum and Kanban boards, robust backlog management, and release tracking to coordinate work from planning to delivery. It also integrates with Jira Service Management and other Atlassian tools through automation rules, linking issues to support tickets, docs, and source-repo activity.
Pros
- Highly configurable workflows with conditions, validators, and post-functions
- Strong Scrum and Kanban planning with backlog prioritization and board controls
- Extensive automation and issue linking across teams and tools
Cons
- Workflow and permission configuration can be complex for new teams
- Scaling governance across many projects often requires careful admin upkeep
- Reporting quality depends on disciplined issue hygiene
Best For
Software teams needing configurable issue workflows and delivery tracking at scale
Confluence
knowledge baseTeam knowledge base for product documentation that enables async collaboration with page comments, change history, and permissions.
Jira issue and link integration that keeps documentation synchronized with work items
Confluence stands out with a mature team knowledge base built for structured pages and shared editing. It supports documentation spaces, powerful search, and tight integration with Jira for linking issues to living documentation. Asynchronous collaboration is handled through page comments, mentions, and granular permission controls. It also includes templates and content macros for standardizing how teams capture decisions, runbooks, and project updates.
Pros
- Strong space and permission model for organizing large documentation sets
- Jira linking keeps plans and incidents tied to the same knowledge artifacts
- Commenting, mentions, and approvals support asynchronous reviews
Cons
- Page hierarchy and permissions can become complex for multi-team programs
- Large instances can feel slower without careful information architecture
- Real-time editing is solid, but structured workflows need additional setup
Best For
Teams maintaining shared documentation with Jira-linked workflows
More related reading
Trello
kanbanKanban board management tool that supports async execution with cards, checklists, due dates, and comment threads.
Butler automation for trigger-based board actions on cards and due dates
Trello stands out with a board-first interface that turns workflows into draggable cards and lists. Teams can manage tasks across multiple boards, use checklists and due dates, and connect work with Butler automation. Collaboration features include comments, file attachments, mentions, and activity history for lightweight async coordination. Power-ups expand capabilities like dashboards, time tracking, and integrations with other tools.
Pros
- Board and card model makes complex work visible at a glance
- Butler automation handles recurring actions like due-date moves and card assignments
- Checklists, labels, and due dates support practical task detail without setup overhead
- Comments, mentions, and attachments keep async context inside each card
- Power-ups extend functionality for reporting, calendars, and tool integrations
Cons
- Limited native reporting and workflow governance for large, cross-team dependencies
- No built-in dependency management or advanced scheduling across many linked tasks
- Automation rules can become difficult to audit in busy boards
Best For
Teams needing flexible kanban planning and lightweight async task collaboration
Slack
team messagingTeam messaging platform that supports async work with searchable channels, threaded conversations, saved file sharing, and notifications.
Workflow Builder for creating approvals, forms, and automated triggers inside Slack
Slack stands out for turning team chat into a structured work surface with channels, threaded discussions, and searchable history. It supports file sharing, voice and video calls, and workflow automation via Slack Connect and app integrations. Users also get workflow primitives like reminders, message shortcuts, and shared canvases for organizing cross-team efforts.
Pros
- Threaded conversations keep discussions organized without losing context
- Deep integration ecosystem connects chat to dev tools, docs, and ticketing
- Powerful search and channel structure make knowledge easy to retrieve
- Reliable notifications and mentions support fast team coordination
Cons
- Workflow automation can become complex across many apps
- Message-heavy usage can bury decisions despite search
- Granular governance and permissions require careful configuration
Best For
Teams needing chat-first collaboration with strong integrations and search
More related reading
Zoom
video asyncVideo meetings and webinar platform that supports async collaboration through recorded sessions, transcripts, and shared replays.
Breakout Rooms for structured small-group sessions within a single meeting
Zoom stands out with real-time video and audio plus practical meeting administration tools for teams and external partners. It supports scheduled meetings, instant meetings, screen sharing, and recordings for turning live sessions into reusable async assets. Breakout rooms and webinar-style workflows help structure larger discussions. Centralized meeting controls and integrations support consistent communication across distributed teams.
Pros
- Stable real-time video and audio for complex meetings
- Meeting recording and transcript outputs enable asynchronous review
- Breakout rooms support structured discussion without extra tooling
Cons
- Async experiences depend on recordings and manual follow-up
- Large meetings can require careful admin setup to stay manageable
- Live-first design limits fully async workflows compared with purpose-built tools
Best For
Teams needing reliable live video plus recorded outputs for asynchronous follow-ups
Loom
record-and-shareScreen and camera recording tool that enables async communication with shareable videos, playback links, and lightweight feedback.
One-click screen recording with instant shareable links for async team review
Loom stands out for turning screen recordings into quick, shareable video updates that reduce back-and-forth. It supports recording from a browser tab, desktop, or webcam, then publishing links for async review and feedback. Teams also use lightweight editing tools like trimming and blur to make recordings clearer for viewers. Loom integrates with common collaboration tools to route feedback where work happens.
Pros
- Fast screen capture workflow with immediate link sharing for async updates
- Built-in editing for trimming and visual focus without leaving the app
- Webcam overlay enables clear explanation alongside screen actions
- Integrations streamline sending videos into existing team conversations
Cons
- Video-heavy updates can overwhelm channels compared with concise written notes
- Review features like threaded feedback remain limited versus full video annotation tools
- Long recordings often need manual trimming to stay scannable
Best For
Teams needing quick screen-recorded updates for async reviews and onboarding
How to Choose the Right Async Software
This buyer's guide helps teams choose the right async collaboration software across Figma, Notion, Miro, Linear, Jira Software, Confluence, Trello, Slack, Zoom, and Loom. It maps specific async workflows like design review, documentation review, issue tracking, visual planning, and recorded updates to the tools that handle them best. It also covers concrete selection steps, common implementation mistakes, and an FAQ with tool-specific answers.
What Is Async Software?
Async software enables teams to collaborate without needing everyone to be online at the same time. It supports review and decision workflows through comments, mentions, version history, audit trails, and shareable links. Teams use these tools to reduce meeting load while keeping feedback tied to the exact artifact under review. Figma and Confluence show common patterns where stakeholders review designs or documentation through comments and page or file history.
Key Features to Look For
Async workflows fail when feedback does not stay attached to the right artifact, when auditability is weak, or when automation does not reflect how work actually moves.
Artifact-tied async commenting and review threads
Look for review comments and mentions that attach to specific objects like design frames or task cards. Figma supports real-time collaborative editing with comments and version history for design review cycles. Trello includes comment threads and mentions inside each card so feedback stays connected to a single task.
Version history and auditable change tracking
Async teams need visible history to understand what changed and who reviewed it. Figma provides file-level organization plus version history for design iteration. Confluence adds page comments and change history so documentation approvals remain traceable.
Structured planning views with scalable organization
Reliable async execution needs a way to structure work so it stays navigable as volume grows. Miro uses an infinite canvas with frames to organize large-scale workshops and planning boards. Linear and Trello offer board-first Kanban experiences that keep tasks and statuses easy to scan.
Process automation that updates work based on events
Async work improves when updates happen automatically instead of relying on people to remember next steps. Linear includes automations that auto-update issues based on events and rules. Trello’s Butler runs trigger-based board actions on cards and due dates.
Workflow governance controls for enforced processes
Teams that must enforce approvals and rules need workflow builders with conditions and validators. Jira Software includes a Workflow Builder with validators, conditions, and post-functions for enforcing process rules. Slack’s Workflow Builder supports approvals, forms, and automated triggers inside Slack for lightweight but structured governance.
Shareable async assets for review and follow-up
Async collaboration depends on easy sharing of reviewable artifacts without additional scheduling. Loom provides one-click screen recording with instant shareable links for async team review. Zoom turns live sessions into recorded sessions with transcripts and replays that stakeholders can review later.
How to Choose the Right Async Software
Choosing the right async tool means matching the primary artifact under review and the required workflow rules to a platform built for that artifact.
Start from the artifact that needs async review
Design-heavy teams should evaluate Figma because it supports collaborative UI prototyping with comments, version history, and shareable design links. Knowledge and SOP-driven teams should evaluate Notion because it combines wiki-style pages with relational databases, custom properties, and page comments for auditable review. Visual planners should evaluate Miro because its infinite canvas and frames keep large workshop-style planning organized for asynchronous feedback.
Map feedback to execution work items
Engineering teams that run async delivery should consider Linear because it uses an issue-centric Kanban and task comments tied to status changes and due dates. Teams needing deeper workflow enforcement should evaluate Jira Software because it provides configurable issue types, workflows, and board views. For simpler Kanban coordination, Trello offers card-based task context with comments, attachments, and activity history.
Decide how much workflow governance and audit enforcement is required
If teams need enforced process rules, Jira Software offers Workflow Builder tools with validators, conditions, and post-functions. If teams need structured approvals inside existing chat, Slack’s Workflow Builder supports approvals, forms, and automated triggers. If documentation must stay synchronized with work items, Confluence pairs page comments and approvals with Jira issue and link integration.
Choose the right knowledge structure for async traceability
Notion is a strong fit for async project trackers and SOP libraries because it supports relational databases with multiple database views and custom properties. Confluence is a strong fit for documentation spaces because it provides a mature space and permission model with Jira-linked documentation. If the organization requires visuals and workshops rather than documentation pages, Miro frames provide the structure to prevent information sprawl.
Pick the best async update medium when decisions require context beyond text
For quick screen-based updates, Loom offers browser tab, desktop, and webcam recording with trimming and instant playback links. For async review of live discussions, Zoom provides meeting recordings with transcripts and shared replays. For chat-first teams that need threaded decisions and search, Slack provides threaded conversations, notifications, and deep integration with the rest of the work stack.
Who Needs Async Software?
Async software benefits teams that must share work artifacts, collect feedback across time zones, and keep review history attached to decisions.
Product and design teams building UI systems and prototyping for stakeholder validation
Figma is the strongest match because it delivers Auto Layout for responsive components plus comments, version history, and inspectable developer handoff. Teams use prototype links and interactive states to validate product direction asynchronously.
Knowledge-driven teams running trackers, SOP libraries, and structured documentation workflows
Notion fits teams that need relational databases with multiple views and custom properties for async tracking and review. Confluence fits teams that prioritize a space and permission model and that synchronize documentation with Jira issue links.
Engineering and delivery teams managing async execution with visible status movement
Linear fits teams that want an issue-first Kanban and fast async execution using status changes, task comments, due dates, and automations. Jira Software fits teams that need configurable workflows with validators, conditions, and post-functions for enforced delivery processes.
Teams coordinating across time zones with visual planning, workshops, and diagrams
Miro fits teams that need an infinite canvas with frames to organize large planning boards without slide constraints. Trello fits teams that need lightweight async Kanban planning with Butler automations for recurring actions like due-date moves and assignments.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Async tools underperform when workflows demand more structure than the platform provides or when governance and information architecture are neglected.
Building brittle structures without consistent conventions
Figma’s Auto Layout and component systems scale well, but advanced layout and component setups require practice to avoid brittle structures. Conventions for naming and structure matter because handoff workflows still rely on consistent organization.
Using a single documentation surface for every purpose
Notion can become slow to navigate when information architecture is weak across large workspaces. Confluence can also become complex when page hierarchy and permissions expand across multi-team programs.
Letting visual planning become unstructured and hard to navigate
Miro’s infinite canvas can lead to information sprawl and slow navigation for large boards. Structuring with frames helps prevent scattered artifacts from breaking async review clarity.
Over-automating without audit-friendly control
Trello automation with Butler can become difficult to audit as boards get busy. Slack workflow automation across many apps can become complex without careful governance, especially when approvals and triggers span multiple integrations.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
we evaluated every tool on three sub-dimensions. features have a weight of 0.4. ease of use has a weight of 0.3. value has a weight of 0.3. The overall rating is the weighted average of those three, computed as overall = 0.40 × features + 0.30 × ease of use + 0.30 × value. Figma separated from lower-ranked tools with a concrete capability in the features dimension, since Auto Layout enables responsive component behavior that adapts across screen sizes for async stakeholder validation.
Frequently Asked Questions About Async Software
Which async tool works best for visual planning when stakeholders need to comment across time zones?
Miro fits visual planning because its infinite canvas supports frames for structured workshops and keeps boards reviewable via comments and mentions. Figma can also work for visual collaboration, but it focuses on UI design workflows and inspectable handoff rather than workshop-style planning.
What tool is best for tracking execution asynchronously with due dates and status history?
Linear supports async execution through task comments, status changes, and due dates tied to its Kanban and list workflow. Jira Software also supports async tracking at scale using configurable issue types, Scrum and Kanban boards, and release tracking for end-to-end traceability.
Which platform is best for maintaining a living knowledge base that ties decisions and documentation to work items?
Confluence fits teams that need structured documentation with page comments, mentions, granular permissions, and templates for runbooks and updates. It also links tightly with Jira so documentation can reference Jira issues and stay connected to delivery work.
Which async system works best for SOP libraries and project trackers built on relational data?
Notion fits async knowledge operations because it combines wiki pages with relational databases, custom properties, and templates. Teams can build project trackers and SOP libraries that remain reviewable via page comments, mentions, and change history.
Which async tool is best for engineering issue workflows that need automation and strict process rules?
Jira Software supports strict process rules with workflow builders that include validators, conditions, and post-functions. Linear can automate updates with rules and integrations, but Jira’s workflow configuration depth is stronger when multiple teams need enforceable delivery standards.
What is the best choice for lightweight async task coordination when a team prefers boards over tickets?
Trello fits lightweight async coordination because work is organized as draggable cards with checklists, due dates, comments, and attachment handling. It also uses Butler automation for trigger-based card updates, while Linear and Jira emphasize issue-first engineering workflows.
Which async tool should teams use for chat-first coordination without losing searchable context?
Slack fits teams that want chat-first collaboration with threaded discussions, channel organization, and searchable history. Loom and Zoom can generate shareable artifacts that get routed through Slack threads, and Slack workflow automation can turn messages into approvals and forms.
How do teams best capture live meetings into assets that support asynchronous follow-ups?
Zoom fits this need because it supports scheduled meetings, screen sharing, recordings, and breakout rooms for structured small-group discussion. Loom can then convert follow-up screen updates into short async videos that link back to the context created in Zoom.
What tool is best for quick async screen updates during debugging, reviews, or onboarding?
Loom fits quick async screen updates because it records from a browser tab, desktop, or webcam and publishes shareable links for review. Figma and Confluence support async feedback via comments, but Loom is more direct for visual debugging and step-by-step walkthroughs.
Which async tool supports end-to-end UI workflows and reduces handoff friction to developers?
Figma fits end-to-end UI workflows because it includes vector editing, Auto Layout, components, and interactive prototypes. Design handoff is easier because inspectable properties make assets and specs easier to consume, which is a different focus than Notion or Confluence documentation workflows.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 technology digital media, Figma stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
Tools reviewed
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Technology Digital Media alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of technology digital media tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare technology digital media tools→FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS
Not on this list? Let’s fix that.
Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.
Apply for a ListingWHAT THIS INCLUDES
Where buyers compare
Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.
Editorial write-up
We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.
On-page brand presence
You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.
Kept up to date
We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.