GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Arts Creative ExpressionTop 10 Best Acting Software of 2026
Compare the top 10 Acting Software picks for scriptwriting, revisions, and collaboration. Explore Final Draft, Celtx, and WriterDuet.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Final Draft
Auto-formatting that maintains correct screenplay page layout as content changes
Built for professional screenplay writers producing formatted drafts and revisions.
Celtx
Scene breakdown and scheduling exports generated from formatted scripts
Built for indie teams turning scripts into scene documents and production-ready drafts.
WriterDuet
Live real-time co-authoring with synchronized cursors and simultaneous editing
Built for collaborative screenplay drafting for small teams needing live editing and formatting.
Related reading
Comparison Table
This comparison table maps acting-script and production workflow tools across core use cases, including screenplay writing, collaboration, pitching, review, and media feedback. Readers can scan side-by-side differences among Final Draft, Celtx, WriterDuet, StudioBinder, Frame.io, and related platforms to see how each option fits specific creative and post-production needs.
| # | Tool | Category | Overall | Features | Ease of Use | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Final Draft Screenwriting software that formats scripts to industry standards and supports collaboration and revisions. | screenwriting | 9.1/10 | 9.4/10 | 8.8/10 | 9.0/10 |
| 2 | Celtx Scriptwriting and preproduction suite that supports outlining, storyboards, scheduling, and production collaboration. | script-to-production | 7.6/10 | 7.7/10 | 7.4/10 | 7.7/10 |
| 3 | WriterDuet Real-time collaborative screenwriting tool built for co-writing and version tracking. | collaboration | 8.0/10 | 8.2/10 | 7.6/10 | 8.0/10 |
| 4 | StudioBinder Production planning platform for scripts, call sheets, shot lists, and organization of assets for actors and crews. | production planning | 8.1/10 | 8.7/10 | 7.9/10 | 7.5/10 |
| 5 | Frame.io Video review and annotation tool that lets teams review takes, mark timestamps, and manage feedback workflows. | video review | 8.2/10 | 8.6/10 | 8.0/10 | 7.7/10 |
| 6 | Shotgrid Asset tracking and production management system that organizes scenes, tasks, and review links across teams. | production management | 8.3/10 | 8.8/10 | 7.8/10 | 8.0/10 |
| 7 | Reltio Data platform used to build unified entity records for production and cast-related data workflows. | data platform | 7.4/10 | 7.6/10 | 6.9/10 | 7.5/10 |
| 8 | Notion Flexible workspace for building actor packets, rehearsal schedules, and script tracking databases. | organizer | 7.7/10 | 8.2/10 | 7.5/10 | 7.2/10 |
| 9 | Trello Kanban task board tool for organizing auditions, sides, rehearsals, and review checklists. | task management | 7.9/10 | 7.8/10 | 9.0/10 | 6.9/10 |
| 10 | Asana Project management system for rehearsal plans, casting timelines, and production task assignments. | project management | 7.6/10 | 7.6/10 | 8.2/10 | 6.9/10 |
Screenwriting software that formats scripts to industry standards and supports collaboration and revisions.
Scriptwriting and preproduction suite that supports outlining, storyboards, scheduling, and production collaboration.
Real-time collaborative screenwriting tool built for co-writing and version tracking.
Production planning platform for scripts, call sheets, shot lists, and organization of assets for actors and crews.
Video review and annotation tool that lets teams review takes, mark timestamps, and manage feedback workflows.
Asset tracking and production management system that organizes scenes, tasks, and review links across teams.
Data platform used to build unified entity records for production and cast-related data workflows.
Flexible workspace for building actor packets, rehearsal schedules, and script tracking databases.
Kanban task board tool for organizing auditions, sides, rehearsals, and review checklists.
Project management system for rehearsal plans, casting timelines, and production task assignments.
Final Draft
screenwritingScreenwriting software that formats scripts to industry standards and supports collaboration and revisions.
Auto-formatting that maintains correct screenplay page layout as content changes
Final Draft stands out with screenplay-first writing tools that handle industry-standard formatting automatically. It provides scene and script management, revision history, and export options for sharing drafts. Built-in outlining and character tools keep story structure connected to formatted pages.
Pros
- Industry-standard screenplay formatting that updates as text changes
- Outline, scene organization, and script navigation streamline structural edits
- Robust revisions and version tracking reduce lost-change risk
- Export and sharing support for review workflows
Cons
- Formatting behavior can feel rigid for unconventional layout needs
- Collaboration and real-time co-authoring are not its core strength
- Advanced workflows often require learning multiple tools
Best For
Professional screenplay writers producing formatted drafts and revisions
More related reading
Celtx
script-to-productionScriptwriting and preproduction suite that supports outlining, storyboards, scheduling, and production collaboration.
Scene breakdown and scheduling exports generated from formatted scripts
Celtx stands out for turning scripted writing into production-ready assets with an end-to-end screenplay workflow. It supports script formatting, scene breakdowns, and exportable documents used for production planning. The tool also includes collaboration features for working with drafts and shared project files, with media organization for files attached to scenes. Celtx is strongest for teams that want script-to-document structure without building custom automation.
Pros
- Script formatting with industry-style screenplay structure
- Scene breakdown tools convert drafts into production documents
- Collaboration supports shared editing of scripts and project assets
- Media organization by scene keeps production materials findable
Cons
- Production management depth lags specialized project tools
- Customization options for complex pipelines can feel limited
- Workflow guidance is uneven across writing and breakdown modes
- Asset exports can require manual cleanup for final delivery
Best For
Indie teams turning scripts into scene documents and production-ready drafts
WriterDuet
collaborationReal-time collaborative screenwriting tool built for co-writing and version tracking.
Live real-time co-authoring with synchronized cursors and simultaneous editing
WriterDuet stands out for its real-time co-authoring with live cursors, so multiple writers can edit simultaneously in the same screenplay document. It includes standard screenplay formatting tools like scene headings, character names, dialogue styles, and auto-formatting that maintains document structure. The platform also provides revision tools such as version history and change comparisons, which helps track edits across collaborative sessions. Cloud syncing keeps drafts consistent across devices without manual file transfers.
Pros
- Real-time co-editing with live presence updates speeds collaborative writing
- Auto-formatting for screenplay elements reduces manual layout fixes
- Version history supports reviewing changes across writing sessions
- Cloud autosave keeps drafts synchronized across devices
Cons
- Collaboration controls are simpler than advanced desktop authoring workflows
- Power users may want deeper outlining and formatting customization
- Large scripts can feel slower during heavy edits and navigation
Best For
Collaborative screenplay drafting for small teams needing live editing and formatting
More related reading
StudioBinder
production planningProduction planning platform for scripts, call sheets, shot lists, and organization of assets for actors and crews.
Script breakdown and scene tracking that ties pages, departments, and production documents together
StudioBinder stands out with a film and production-first pipeline built around shot lists, call sheets, and script-to-screen tracking. It centralizes production documents, schedules, and team collaboration so acting teams can align on pages, beats, and on-set logistics. Core tools include screenplay breakdowns, customizable forms, asset management for continuity, and role-based permissions across departments.
Pros
- Script breakdowns connect scenes to schedule and production documents
- Real-time collaboration keeps cast and crew aligned on changes
- Shot list and continuity tools reduce mismatches between script and set
Cons
- Setup of custom workflows takes planning before teams get full benefit
- Acting-specific views are thinner than full production planning features
- Document complexity can slow quick table reads and last-minute updates
Best For
Production teams needing screenplay breakdown and shared scheduling for performances
Frame.io
video reviewVideo review and annotation tool that lets teams review takes, mark timestamps, and manage feedback workflows.
Frame.io Comments on timeline and still frames with threaded replies
Frame.io distinguishes itself with cloud-based video review that keeps feedback attached to exact frames and timestamps. It supports threaded comments, version comparisons, and review links for tight collaboration across editing and post-production workflows. Integrations with common creator and editing tools help move assets through review without losing context. Review statuses and permissions provide practical control for teams coordinating approvals and revisions.
Pros
- Frame-precise comments with timestamps for fast, unambiguous feedback
- Review links and viewer permissions streamline external stakeholder review
- Side-by-side version comparisons reduce confusion during revisions
- Status tracking shows what is approved, pending, or revised
Cons
- Annotation accuracy depends on frame timing setup and editor workflow
- Deep customization of review workflows is limited for complex approvals
- Large libraries can feel heavy to navigate without strong organization
Best For
Post-production teams needing precise, link-based video review workflows
Shotgrid
production managementAsset tracking and production management system that organizes scenes, tasks, and review links across teams.
ShotGrid Review and approval workflows attached to shot, asset, and version objects
ShotGrid centers on production tracking for creative workflows, linking tasks, approvals, and asset progress across teams. It supports configurable project structures, metadata-driven media management, and timeline views for coordinating shots through review and delivery stages. The platform integrates tightly with common DCC tools and studio pipelines using APIs and connectors, which helps automate handoffs between departments. Real-time collaboration features such as comments, notifications, and status tracking keep context attached to specific shots and assets.
Pros
- Shot and asset tracking connects notes, versions, and approvals to production objects
- Robust metadata and configurable workflows fit live pipeline processes
- Strong DCC integration and API access support automation across departments
Cons
- Setup and workflow configuration require pipeline expertise and ongoing admin work
- Complex configurations can slow adoption for smaller, less structured teams
- UI navigation and view management feel heavy without established conventions
Best For
Studios and VFX teams needing shot-centric tracking with pipeline automation
More related reading
Reltio
data platformData platform used to build unified entity records for production and cast-related data workflows.
Match and Merge with rules-based survivorship and stewardship governance
Reltio stands out with a graph-first approach that unifies customer, product, and party data into a single, governed entity model. Its core capabilities cover match and merge, survivorship rules, and MDM data stewardship workflows designed for cross-domain master data management. The platform also supports real-time updates through event ingestion and downstream syncing to operational systems. For acting software use cases, it provides the identity backbone needed to drive automated actions based on consistent, deduplicated attributes.
Pros
- Graph-based entity modeling strengthens deduplication and relationship resolution
- Rules-driven survivorship supports predictable data outcomes across domains
- Event-driven updates keep master data synchronized with operational systems
Cons
- Stitching data sources and tuning matching rules requires specialized effort
- Governance workflows can feel complex for smaller teams and narrower scopes
- Operational integrations often need more design work than lightweight MDM tools
Best For
Enterprises needing governed identity resolution to power automated actions
Notion
organizerFlexible workspace for building actor packets, rehearsal schedules, and script tracking databases.
Databases with relations and multiple views for scripts, scenes, and production tracking
Notion stands out with a single workspace that combines databases, pages, and wiki-style documentation in one flexible system. Acting teams can turn project plans into structured databases, then automate status views with filters, relations, and dashboards. Built-in templates and linked content help coordinate scripts, playbooks, and production checklists while keeping references searchable.
Pros
- Databases power structured acting workflows for scripts, cast notes, and call sheets.
- Relations and linked pages keep character, scene, and production context consistent.
- Dashboards and views make progress tracking fast without building separate tools.
Cons
- Complex database schemas can feel slow to design and hard to maintain.
- Automations are limited, so advanced workflow logic often needs external tools.
- Versioning and approvals are not as robust as purpose-built production management systems.
Best For
Productions needing flexible documentation and structured task tracking without heavy engineering
More related reading
Trello
task managementKanban task board tool for organizing auditions, sides, rehearsals, and review checklists.
Board automation rules that move cards based on triggers and actions
Trello stands out with its card-and-board workflow model that makes task status changes visually obvious. It supports checklists, due dates, labels, file attachments, comments, and activity history on each card. Power-ups extend boards with capabilities like calendar views and integrations, while automations can move cards when conditions are met. Collaboration stays centralized through shared boards, mentions, and real-time updates across boards and lists.
Pros
- Visual boards make workflow tracking fast for changing priorities.
- Card checklists, labels, and due dates cover common execution needs.
- Power-ups add integrations like calendar views for operational planning.
Cons
- Complex dependencies and portfolio-level planning need add-ons or discipline.
- Reporting stays limited without deeper integrations and exports.
- Scaling to large programs can become messy with many boards.
Best For
Teams needing lightweight visual task management without heavy process design
Asana
project managementProject management system for rehearsal plans, casting timelines, and production task assignments.
Rules and automation for routing work, updating fields, and enforcing consistent status changes
Asana stands out with Work Management views that connect tasks, owners, due dates, and project context in one place. Core capabilities include task lists, timelines, boards, dashboards, and cross-project reporting. Built-in automations and rules help teams route work and keep statuses consistent without manual updates. Integrations with common collaboration tools support updates from chat and file systems into ongoing work.
Pros
- Multiple work views support planning from boards to timelines
- Rules and automation keep assignments and statuses consistent
- Dashboards and reporting show progress across many projects
Cons
- Advanced cross-team workflows can require careful setup
- Resource planning and dependency tracking are limited for complex operations
Best For
Teams coordinating multi-project task execution with strong visibility
How to Choose the Right Acting Software
This buyer’s guide explains how to choose acting-focused software for script drafting, breakdowns, cast and rehearsal documentation, and on-set approvals. It covers Final Draft, Celtx, WriterDuet, StudioBinder, Frame.io, Shotgrid, Reltio, Notion, Trello, and Asana. The guidance maps common workflows to specific tools and concrete features so teams can match capabilities to production needs.
What Is Acting Software?
Acting software is a set of tools that organizes scripts, sides, scenes, cast notes, rehearsal plans, and performance documentation into a shared workflow. It solves problems like industry-standard formatting, version control, scene breakdown structure, and keeping feedback attached to the right moment or deliverable. Many teams use script-first tools such as Final Draft to generate clean, formatted screenplay drafts that remain consistent as text changes. Teams that need rehearsal and production task visibility often use StudioBinder, Notion, Trello, or Asana to turn pages into scheduled, assignable execution steps.
Key Features to Look For
The right features reduce rework by keeping formatting, structure, feedback, and status aligned from script to performance planning.
Industry-standard screenplay auto-formatting
Auto-formatting keeps screenplay page layout correct as writers edit scenes and dialogue. Final Draft delivers industry-standard screenplay formatting that updates as text changes, which reduces manual layout fixes during revisions. WriterDuet also provides auto-formatting for screenplay elements so collaborative edits do not break structure.
Scene breakdown and script-to-document production outputs
Scene breakdown tools convert a screenplay into production-ready documents that crews can act on. Celtx generates scene breakdowns and scheduling exports from formatted scripts so teams can move from writing to production planning. StudioBinder ties pages to shot lists, call sheet content, and shared production documents through script breakdown and scene tracking.
Real-time co-authoring with live presence
Live co-authoring speeds collaboration by showing who is editing and what is changing in the same screenplay. WriterDuet provides real-time co-authoring with live cursors and simultaneous editing so multiple writers can work on one document. This reduces the back-and-forth overhead that happens when drafts are exchanged as separate files.
Robust revision history and change comparison
Revision tools protect teams from lost edits and help actors and production partners review exactly what changed. Final Draft includes robust revisions and version tracking to reduce lost-change risk when drafts evolve. WriterDuet adds version history and change comparisons to make collaborative edits easier to audit.
Frame-precise feedback and threaded review workflows for video takes
Frame-precise comments attach feedback to exact timestamps and moments in footage. Frame.io supports threaded comments on timeline and still frames so collaborators can discuss performance takes without ambiguity. Review links and viewer permissions help coordinate approvals and revisions across stakeholders.
Shot, asset, and approval workflows tied to production objects
Shot-centric approval tracking connects notes and decisions directly to the shot or version that needs action. Shotgrid provides review and approval workflows attached to shot, asset, and version objects, which supports pipeline automation across departments. StudioBinder also supports collaboration with screenplay breakdowns and continuity tools that reduce mismatches between script and set.
How to Choose the Right Acting Software
Choose a tool by matching the primary workflow to the product strengths for formatting, breakdowns, feedback, or task routing.
Start with the dominant artifact: script, performance video, or production tasks
If the workflow begins with screenplay drafts and needs formatting that stays correct through edits, Final Draft is built around industry-standard screenplay formatting and auto-formatting. If the workflow begins with turning scripts into scene documents and scheduling outputs, Celtx and StudioBinder create scene breakdowns that feed production planning. If the workflow focuses on reviewing performance takes, Frame.io attaches feedback to frames and timestamps, which keeps acting notes tied to the exact moment.
Match collaboration needs to the collaboration style
For multiple writers editing the same screenplay in real time, WriterDuet offers live cursors, simultaneous editing, and synchronized cloud syncing. For teams coordinating cast and crew planning documents, StudioBinder provides real-time collaboration and role-based permissions across departments so acting teams can align on pages and on-set logistics. For lightweight coordination tasks, Trello offers shared boards and real-time updates so teams can execute rehearsal and review checklists without complex document logic.
Validate that revision tracking fits the review cadence
When multiple draft cycles happen during development, Final Draft’s revision history and version tracking reduce lost-change risk. When co-writing requires continuous auditability, WriterDuet adds version history and change comparisons. When video approvals drive performance changes, Frame.io status tracking shows what is approved, pending, or revised so teams do not debate which take version is current.
Confirm that scene breakdown outputs match the set-facing documents needed
If scheduling and scene documents are the core deliverables, Celtx generates scene breakdown and scheduling exports directly from formatted scripts. If continuity and shot lists must stay aligned with pages and departments, StudioBinder’s script-to-screen tracking and shot list and continuity tools reduce mismatches between script and set. If tracking must attach to assets and pipeline steps across many departments, Shotgrid ties approvals to shot, asset, and version objects.
Pick the right system for task routing and status consistency
If consistent execution routing across teams is the priority, Asana provides rules and automation for routing work and enforcing consistent status changes. If teams want visual task execution with automation that moves items between lists, Trello’s board automation rules move cards when triggers fire. If the acting workflow depends on structured documentation and linked context, Notion uses databases with relations and multiple views for scripts, scenes, and production tracking.
Who Needs Acting Software?
Acting software helps production teams and creators manage scripts, sides, rehearsals, scene breakdowns, and feedback loops with tools matched to their workflow stage.
Professional screenplay writers producing formatted drafts and revisions
Final Draft is the best fit when industry-standard screenplay formatting must remain correct as content changes because it auto-formats to maintain screenplay page layout. Its revision history and version tracking also reduce lost-change risk during repeated drafting cycles.
Indie teams turning scripts into scene documents and production-ready drafts
Celtx fits teams that need script formatting plus scene breakdowns that convert drafts into production documents. Celtx also generates scheduling exports from formatted scripts so teams can move from writing to production planning.
Small teams co-writing and iterating drafts with live editing
WriterDuet is built for collaborative screenplay drafting using live real-time co-authoring with synchronized cursors and simultaneous editing. Its cloud autosave and version history support consistent document updates across devices and sessions.
Production and acting teams aligning performances with on-set logistics
StudioBinder suits acting and production teams that need screenplay breakdowns connected to schedules, call sheet content, and continuity tools. It supports real-time collaboration and scene tracking that ties pages, departments, and production documents together.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Common selection errors happen when teams pick a tool that does not match the workflow artifact or when they underestimate setup complexity for production pipelines.
Choosing a spreadsheet-style system for screenplay formatting
Systems that are not screenplay-first can break formatting workflows when edits change page layout. Final Draft maintains correct screenplay page layout through auto-formatting so it avoids formatting drift during revisions.
Expecting a script tool to provide post-production approvals tied to takes
Script writing tools do not attach acting feedback to exact frames and timestamps. Frame.io solves this by supporting frame-precise comments with threaded replies and status tracking for approvals and revisions.
Using generic task boards without structured relationships between scripts, scenes, and tracking
Kanban lists can track execution but may not preserve the context links actors need between scripts and production artifacts. Notion supports databases with relations and linked pages so scripts, scenes, and production tracking stay connected across views.
Underestimating pipeline setup for shot-centric tracking systems
Shot-centric systems require configuration to reflect real studio workflows and metadata needs. Shotgrid’s strong shot and asset tracking with review and approval workflows depends on setup and workflow configuration, which can require pipeline expertise and ongoing admin work.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
we evaluated every tool on three sub-dimensions. features carried a weight of 0.4, ease of use carried a weight of 0.3, and value carried a weight of 0.3. The overall rating is the weighted average where overall = 0.40 × features + 0.30 × ease of use + 0.30 × value. Final Draft separated itself with industry-standard screenplay auto-formatting that maintains correct screenplay page layout as content changes, which delivered a strong features score for script-first acting workflows compared with tools that focus more on planning documents or task tracking.
Frequently Asked Questions About Acting Software
Which acting software best preserves correct screenplay formatting during revisions?
Final Draft keeps screenplay page layout aligned while changes update scene and character text. WriterDuet also auto-formats screenplay elements, but Final Draft is optimized for single-writer professional draft control with reliable industry formatting.
What tool converts a script into production-ready documents for indie teams?
Celtx supports an end-to-end screenplay workflow that outputs scene breakdowns and exportable documents for production planning. StudioBinder connects screenplay breakdowns to shot and scheduling artifacts, which suits teams that need production documents tied to performances.
Which platform is best for real-time collaborative script writing with live editing?
WriterDuet provides real-time co-authoring with synchronized cursors in the same screenplay document. Final Draft and Celtx support versioned revision workflows, but neither matches WriterDuet’s live multi-editor editing experience.
How do productions attach acting-related notes to specific moments in video playback?
Frame.io records threaded comments at exact frames and timestamps so reviews map directly to performance moments. Shotgrid focuses on shot-centric progress and approvals rather than timecode-anchored review comments.
What acting software works best when shot lists, call sheets, and script-to-screen tracking must stay consistent?
StudioBinder centers on a film and production pipeline with screenplay breakdowns, customizable forms, and centralized scheduling documents. Shotgrid adds deeper pipeline and review tracking across shots and assets, but StudioBinder’s production-document focus is stronger for acting teams aligning on on-set logistics.
Which tool is most suitable for enterprises that need governed identity and deduplication for automated workflows?
Reltio uses graph-first master data management with match and merge, survivorship rules, and stewardship governance. This supports an acting workflow architecture that triggers actions based on consistent deduplicated identities.
What is the best choice for organizing acting scripts, scene checklists, and production references in one place?
Notion supports a single workspace built from databases, relations, and multiple views for scripts, scenes, and production tracking. Trello is stronger for lightweight board-based task status, while Notion’s database structure better supports searchable script references tied to structured checklist data.
Which acting software solves common task visibility problems across multiple teams and projects?
Asana provides work management views that connect tasks, owners, due dates, and cross-project reporting with rules and automations to keep statuses consistent. Trello improves day-to-day visibility through card and board activity history, but it is less suited for cross-project reporting depth than Asana’s structured work management.
What should an acting team do when script changes must flow into downstream review and approvals without losing context?
Frame.io keeps feedback attached to specific frames and versions so reviewers see changes against the exact timeline context. Shotgrid helps anchor approvals and comments to shot, asset, and version objects, which reduces ambiguity when script revisions change production deliverables.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 arts creative expression, Final Draft stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
Tools reviewed
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Arts Creative Expression alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of arts creative expression tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare arts creative expression tools→FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS
Not on this list? Let’s fix that.
Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.
Apply for a ListingWHAT THIS INCLUDES
Where buyers compare
Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.
Editorial write-up
We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.
On-page brand presence
You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.
Kept up to date
We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.