01 Industry overview
The agricultural machinery industry at a glance
The agricultural machinery industry is in a cyclical reset: the global market was valued at $123.6 billion in 2025, with weaker replacement demand offset by precision agriculture, automation and emerging-market mechanization.
- $123.6B[49]
- Global market size, 2025
- 5.9%[49]
- Forecast CAGR, 2026–2035
- 38.1%[50]
- Asia-Pacific share, 2025
- 19.9%[51]
- Deere US production share, 2025
- Market size
- The global agriculture equipment market was valued at $123.6 billion in 2025. In the United States, agricultural and forestry machinery demand reached $61.9 billion in 2025, while production value was $39.9 billion.[49][51]
- Forecast & CAGR
- Global agriculture equipment revenue is projected to decline to $119.9 billion in 2026 before expanding at a 5.9% CAGR to $201.2 billion by 2035. North America's market is forecast to grow at a 5.92% CAGR from 2026 to 2033.[49][50]
- Market share & regions
- Asia-Pacific accounted for 38.1% of global agriculture equipment revenue in 2025, while North America represented 29.1%. Asia-Pacific is projected to remain the largest regional market through 2033.[50]
- Segmentation
- Tractors generated $50.7 billion, or 41% of global agriculture equipment revenue, in 2025. In North America, tractors represented 36.9% of market revenue in 2025, with harvesters, planting equipment, irrigation and crop-processing equipment, spraying equipment, and hay and forage equipment forming the other principal segments.[49][50]
- Key players & concentration
- The US market was fragmented across 2,875 companies in 2025; Deere accounted for 19.9% of US industry production value and the top five companies accounted for 35.6%. In North American tractor production, Deere led with a combined 68% share of plant totals in the US and Mexico, followed by Kubota at 10% and Case at 6%.[51][52]
- Pricing
- The FTC's 2025 complaint stated that Deere dealer service rates generally ranged from $130 to $200 per hour in 2024, with field-service rates generally higher than shop rates. Deere also reported reducing prices on nearly 187,000 parts since 2023, with more than half of those reductions occurring in 2025.[53][16]
- Trends, drivers & challenges
- Demand is being supported by precision agriculture, automation, labor shortages and input-efficiency technologies: Deere said See & Spray reduced non-residual herbicide use by nearly 50% on average for customers in 2025. Near-term challenges include weak farm profitability, high borrowing costs, inventory pressure and lower replacement demand; North American tractor production fell 6.2% in 2025 and is expected to decline by nearly 6% in 2026.[16][52][49]
- Consumer behavior & competition
- US farmers purchased 195,857 new tractors and 3,579 combines in 2025, preliminary figures that represented year-over-year declines of 9.86% and 35.58%, respectively. Dealer survey data showed that 67.5% of dealers reported declines of at least 2% in new-equipment sales in 2025, indicating cautious purchasing and a shift toward used equipment, repairs and productivity-enhancing technology.[54][50]
- Regulation
- In July 2026, the FTC and five states reached a settlement with Deere requiring the company, for 10 years, to provide farmers and independent repair providers with repair resources equivalent to those available to authorized dealers. In October 2026, the FTC and USDA also opened a joint inquiry into agricultural equipment manufacturing and distribution practices, with comments due December 7, 2026.[55]
- Latest news
- The latest major US industry development is the FTC and USDA's October 2026 public inquiry into agricultural equipment manufacturing and distribution, focusing on competition, equipment access and repair barriers. It follows the FTC's July 2026 Deere settlement that expanded access to diagnostic and repair resources.[55]
02 Ranking
Top 10 Companies in the Agricultural Machinery Industry
The leading companies in the agricultural machinery industry, ranked on market impact, performance, momentum, innovation and brand popularity.
Updated November 11, 2026 · Next review December 11, 2026
Mahindra & Mahindra stands out for tractor and farm machinery volume because it sold 526,403 tractors in FY26 and reported 43.6% Indian tractor share, while International Tractors focuses on tractor production scale since its tractor plant has annual capacity above 300,000 units.
Ranked by Overall score · How we score ↓
Editor's top 3 picks
Where to start, by need.
#1 Overall · Leader in tractors & implements
Mahindra & Mahindra
IN
Ranked #1 · 9.7 · Tractors & implements
Why we picked it: Its tractor and farm machinery footprint is tied to FY26 volume and a 43.6% share of the Indian tractor market.
Leader in precision agriculture equipment
Deere & Company
US
Ranked #4 · 8.4 · Precision agriculture equipment
Why we picked it: Its presence in tractors and precision agriculture shows up in a 19.9% share of US industry production value in 2025.
Leader in harvesting equipment
CLAAS
DE
Ranked #5 · 8.4 · Harvesting equipment
Why we picked it: Its combines, forage harvesters, and tractors are reflected in €4.918 billion of 2025 sales and 11,654 employees.
Pick 1 is the #1 company overall. Picks 2 and 3 are the highest-ranked companies in the top 5 that add a new segment.
Full ranking
| # | Company | Overall ↓ | Impact | Performance | Momentum | Innovation | Company snapshot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mahindra & Mahindra Tractors & implements · IN | 9.7 | 9.6 | 9.9 | 9.9 | 9.2 | |
Company snapshot · Mahindra & Mahindra · Data as of November 11, 2026 Mahindra sold 526,403 tractors in FY26 and reported 43.6% Indian tractor share.[56]
| |||||||
| 2 | International Tractors Tractors & implements · IN | 8.9 | 8.0 | 9.3 | 9.8 | 9.2 | |
Company snapshot · International Tractors · Data as of November 11, 2026 International Tractors operates a tractor plant with annual capacity above 300,000 units.[57]
| |||||||
| 3 | Weichai Lovol Intelligent Agricultural Technology Tractors & implements · CN | 8.6 | 8.3 | 8.0 | 8.7 | 9.9 | |
Company snapshot · Weichai Lovol Intelligent Agricultural Technology · Data as of November 11, 2026 Lovol manufactures tractors, harvesters and agricultural implements for more than 120 countries and regions.[58]
| |||||||
| 4 | Deere & Company Precision agriculture equipment · US | 8.4 | 9.9 | 7.0 | 7.3 | 8.8 | |
Company snapshot · Deere & Company · Data as of November 11, 2026 Deere manufactures agricultural, construction, forestry and turf equipment worldwide.[16]
| |||||||
| 5 | CLAAS Harvesting equipment · DE | 8.4 | 9.1 | 7.7 | 7.9 | 8.6 | |
Company snapshot · CLAAS · Data as of November 11, 2026 CLAAS reported 2025 sales of €4.918 billion and 11,654 employees.[59]
| |||||||
| 6 | Tractors and Farm Equipment Tractors, implements and farm machinery · IN | 8.2 | 8.0 | 8.5 | 8.4 | 7.8 | |
Company snapshot · Tractors and Farm Equipment · Data as of November 11, 2026 TAFE produces more than 200,000 tractors annually and exports to over 80 countries.[60]
| |||||||
| 7 | KUHN Group Tillage, planting, hay and livestock equipment · FR | 8.1 | 8.2 | 7.3 | 8.0 | 9.2 | |
Company snapshot · KUHN Group · Data as of November 11, 2026 KUHN employs about 6,000 people developing and manufacturing farm machines.[61]
| |||||||
| 8 | Yanmar Holdings Compact tractors, engines and rice machinery · JP | 8.0 | 8.0 | 7.6 | 7.7 | 9.2 | |
Company snapshot · Yanmar Holdings · Data as of November 11, 2026 Yanmar operates across engines, agricultural machinery, construction equipment and marine products.[18]
| |||||||
| 9 | AGCO Tractors, harvesting and precision agriculture · US | 8.0 | 9.1 | 7.2 | 7.3 | 7.9 | |
Company snapshot · AGCO · Data as of November 11, 2026 AGCO describes itself as the largest pure-play farm equipment manufacturer.[21]
| |||||||
| 10 | YTO Group Tractors, harvesters and agricultural machinery · CN | 7.6 | 8.0 | 7.4 | 7.1 | 7.6 | |
Company snapshot · YTO Group · Data as of November 11, 2026
| |||||||
How we score
- Impact (30%): scale and weight in the market (revenue, market share, employees, market position).
- Performance (20%): recent revenue growth and operating margin; an analyst assessment where a company does not publish them.
- Momentum (20%): growth trajectory and future potential.
- Innovation (15%): R&D intensity and how technologically advanced the company is.
Popularity (brand search demand, 15%) counts toward Overall but is not published as a column. Overall leaves out what is not known.
Scale Scores are shown on a 7–10 scale with one decimal; bars start at 7.0.
Cadence Recalculated when new figures are published; next review December 11, 2026.
Independence. Rankings are editorially independent. Scores, ranks, picks and the verdict follow the method above; no company can pay to change them.
Cite this ranking
APA
Samuel Norberg. (2026, November 11). Top 10 companies in the agricultural machinery industry. In Agricultural Machinery Industry Statistics. Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/agricultural-machinery-industry-statistics/#top-companies
Sectoral output of farm machinery and equipment manufacturing (NAICS 333111) (United States)
Sectoral output of farm machinery and equipment manufacturing (NAICS 333111) grew from $23.0B in 2017 to $34.5B in 2021.
03 Trends & forecasts
Top 10 Agricultural Machinery Industry Trends & Forecasts 2027
What is changing in the agricultural machinery industry, with the evidence behind each trend and a forecast for 2027.
Forecasts were generated by an AI model from the cited evidence. They are estimates, not guarantees.
01U.S. Tractor Demand Continues Falling
High confidencePreliminary U.S. tractor sales fell 9.86% year over year to 195,857 units in 2025. AEM also reported a 14.8% year-over-year decline in total tractor sales in December 2025.[54][62]
Forecast 2027: Demand is likely to remain below the 2021–2022 peak in 2027, with recovery concentrated in high-utilization farms and productivity-enhancing models rather than broad-based replacement. A modest unit rebound is plausible if crop margins and financing conditions improve.
02Combine Demand Falls More Sharply
High confidenceU.S. combine sales declined 35.58% to 3,579 units in 2025, according to preliminary data. The sharper decline than tractors indicates that harvesting-equipment replacement cycles are being deferred more aggressively.[54]
Forecast 2027: Combine sales should stabilize in 2027 as deferred replacement needs accumulate, but the recovery is likely to be uneven and weighted toward large farms, custom operators and machines offering measurable harvesting efficiency.
03Dealer Inventories Remain Carefully Managed
High confidenceU.S. farm machinery and equipment inventories reached approximately $5.62 billion in June 2026, about 22.2% below the October 2022 peak of $7.23 billion. Manufacturers have been reducing production to bring inventories closer to weaker demand.[54]
Forecast 2027: Manufacturers are likely to keep production disciplined through 2027, limiting promotional oversupply and prioritizing inventory turns. Restocking should begin selectively if retail sales improve, particularly for compact tractors and precision-enabled implements.
04Used Equipment Gains Buyer Attention
Medium confidenceA 2026 dealer outlook cited by farmdoc reported that 46.3% of dealers saw used-equipment sales decline by at least 2% in 2025, while 67.5% reported comparable declines in new-equipment sales. The smaller decline share for used equipment indicates greater relative resilience in the secondary market.[54]
Forecast 2027: Used equipment, repair and refurbishment should remain important alternatives in 2027, especially for smaller farms and buyers facing expensive credit. New-equipment manufacturers will increasingly use certified-used programs, trade-ins and retrofit packages to support sales.
05Farm Machinery Prices Stay Elevated
Medium confidenceUniversity of Illinois analysis reported that machine-hire costs increased from $16 per acre in 2021 to $22 in 2024 and concluded that supply-chain, inflation and labor pressures suggest machinery prices and costs will not decline materially.[54]
Forecast 2027: Nominal equipment prices are likely to remain high in 2027, even if discounting increases in weak categories. Buyers will place greater emphasis on total cost of ownership, fuel savings, uptime and resale value rather than purchase price alone.
06Repair Spending Gains Strategic Importance
High confidenceUSDA reported $24.0 billion of U.S. farm spending on supplies and repairs in 2024, while tractors and self-propelled machinery accounted for another $21.0 billion. These figures show the scale of the installed-base maintenance opportunity during a weak replacement cycle.[63]
Forecast 2027: In 2027, repair, parts and service revenue should continue outperforming new-unit demand. Manufacturers and dealers will compete more actively on uptime contracts, mobile service, parts availability and remote diagnostics.
07Right-To-Repair Rules Expand Access
High confidenceA July 2026 FTC settlement requires Deere, for 10 years, to provide farmers and independent repair providers with repair resources equivalent to those available to authorized dealers, including software capabilities and technical information.[55]
Forecast 2027: By 2027, repair access should become a more visible competitive differentiator across the industry. Independent repair providers are likely to expand capabilities, while manufacturers will need clearer software-access policies and stronger documentation controls.
08Equipment Distribution Faces More Scrutiny
High confidenceIn October 2026, the FTC and USDA opened a joint public inquiry into agricultural-equipment manufacturing and distribution practices, including possible barriers to equipment access, repair services, market entry and competition. Comments are due December 7, 2026.[55]
Forecast 2027: Regulatory and political scrutiny is likely to remain elevated through 2027. The most probable effects are greater disclosure expectations, closer examination of dealer restrictions and continued pressure for interoperable repair and diagnostic access.
09Precision Spraying Cuts Chemical Use
High confidenceJohn Deere reported that customers using See & Spray reduced non-residual herbicide use by nearly 50% on average in 2025. The company also said ExactShot can reduce starter fertilizer use by more than 60% by applying fertilizer at the seed rather than between seeds.[16]
Forecast 2027: Precision application should expand in 2027 as growers seek lower chemical and fertilizer costs. Adoption will increasingly come through retrofit kits and usage-based licensing, not only through purchases of new self-propelled equipment.
10Retrofits Broaden Technology Adoption
High confidenceJohn Deere offers See & Spray retrofit solutions for existing equipment and described annual licensing as a way for customers to pay for technology only when needed. Its retrofit approach lowers the upfront cost of adding precision functions to installed machines.[16]
Forecast 2027: Retrofits should be one of the fastest-growing technology channels in 2027 because they let farmers modernize fleets without replacing complete machines. Suppliers will increasingly package cameras, displays, connectivity and automation as upgradeable modules.
04 Statistics
Technology & Innovation
Technology adoption is measurable through guidance and robotics usage. In May 2026, 89% of 217 North American farmers and ranchers surveyed by CNH Industrial reported auto-guidance use.
Automation in the agricultural machinery industry
- 89% of 217 North American farmers and ranchers surveyed in May 2026 said they use auto-guidance technology, according to CNH Industrial.[1]
- 7% of EU farms used robotics—machines capable of autonomous operation without direct human intervention—in 2023.[2]
- 4.2% of farms and agricultural contractors in a 2023 German survey used field robots, while 12.7% planned to use them.[3]
- 64.5% of U.S. cotton acres used auto-steer or guidance systems in 2019, the latest year available in the USDA series.[4]
- 70% of large-scale U.S. crop-producing farms used guidance autosteering systems on tractors, harvesters or other equipment in 2023.[4]
Digital Transformation in the agriculture and food production sector (sector benchmark)
- In the United States, 61% of farmers reported adopting digital agronomy technologies in 2024.[5]
- Among EU food-manufacturing enterprises, 3.4% had very high digital intensity in 2023, compared with 2.1% in 2021.[6]
- Among EU food-manufacturing enterprises, 15.4% had high digital intensity in 2023, compared with 13.0% in 2021.[6]
- Across the EU agri-food industrial ecosystem, 20% of companies had a concrete digital-transformation strategy in 2024.[6]
- Among EU food-manufacturing enterprises, 51.2% had very low digital intensity in 2023, down from 55.1% in 2021.[6]
Technology Adoption in the agriculture and food production sector (sector benchmark)
- Across EU farms, 43% had internet access, 11% used farm-management information systems, and 7% used robotics in 2023.[7]
- In Czechia, 30% of crop-production farmers used at least one precision-agriculture technology in 2023.[7]
- In Canada, 84% of field-crop operations used GPS equipment in 2021.[7]
- In Chile, 12% of agricultural production units reported using a technological tool such as mobile applications, drones, or sensors in 2021.[7]
- Across EU farms with utilised agricultural area, about 18% used some form of precision-farming technology or practice in 2023.[7]
- In Germany, 85.5% of surveyed farms used at least one digital technology in 2024–2025.[7]
Cloud Computing in the agriculture and food production sector (sector benchmark)
- Across EU agri-food businesses, 37% used cloud computing in 2024, up from 26% in 2023.[6]
- Across EU businesses, 45% purchased cloud-computing services in 2023.[2]
- Among EU large businesses, 78% purchased cloud-computing services in 2023, compared with 44% of SMEs.[2]
- Across EU agri-food businesses, 26% used cloud computing in 2023.[6]
Big Data in the agriculture and food production sector (sector benchmark)
- Across EU agri-food businesses, 13% used big-data technologies in 2024, compared with 17% in 2023.[6]
- In Germany, 5.0% of surveyed farms used artificial-intelligence or big-data technologies in 2024–2025.[7]
- Across EU agri-food businesses, 17% used big-data technologies in 2023.[6]
- Across EU agri-food businesses, 307 startups focused on artificial intelligence and big data were formed between 2015 and 2023.[6]
IoT in the agriculture and food production sector (sector benchmark)
- Across EU agri-food businesses, 10% used Internet of Things technologies in 2023.[6]
- Among agri-food companies investing more than 30% of annual turnover in digital technologies, 5.41% prioritised Internet of Things technologies in 2024.[6]
- Across EU farms with livestock, about 11% used animal-welfare or health-monitoring systems in 2023.[7]
- Across EU agri-food businesses, 24% used Internet of Things technologies in 2024, up from 10% in 2023.[6]
05 Statistics
Data & Analytics
Data quality and governance show up as constraints on precision-technology participation. In 2025, 33% of precision-agriculture dealers reported customer data-privacy concerns limiting participation.
Business intelligence in the agricultural machinery industry
- 89% of surveyed U.S. and Canadian farmers used auto-guidance technology in 2026, according to CNH’s Farmer Pulse survey.[1]
- 27% of U.S. farms and ranches used precision-agriculture practices to manage crops or livestock in 2023.[10]
- 54% of surveyed U.S. and Canadian farmers planned to invest in additional precision technology within two years in 2026.[1]
- 71% of surveyed U.S. and Canadian farmers said precision technology was important to their operation’s success in 2026.[1]
Data analytics in the agricultural machinery industry
- 31% of U.S. precision-agriculture dealers said interpreting and making decisions with precision information took too much customer time in 2025.[11]
- 33% of precision-agriculture dealers in the United States reported customer data-privacy concerns limiting participation in 2025.[11]
- 36% of surveyed U.S. and Canadian farmers identified uncertainty about return on investment as a barrier to broader precision-technology adoption in 2026.[1]
- 32% of U.S. precision-agriculture dealers said customers lacked confidence in agronomic recommendations based on site-specific data in 2025.[11]
Data Quality in the agriculture and food production sector (sector benchmark)
- 41% of manufacturers said they distrusted the data used for supply-chain operations in 2025, reflecting persistent data-quality concerns in production and procurement.[12]
- 49% of manufacturing respondents rated their operational data as having low AI readiness in 2024, meaning it was insufficiently labeled, contextualized, governed or accessible.[13]
- 42% of manufacturers reported having a process to verify operational data accuracy or quality in 2025, indicating that most lacked a formal validation process.[13]
- 44% of manufacturers reported that AI projects had failed because of poor data quality in 2025, according to a survey of manufacturing organizations.[12]
- 30% of manufacturing respondents identified poor-quality data as one of their top three challenges when working with AI-related data in 2024.[13]
Data Governance in the agriculture and food production sector (sector benchmark)
- 40% of food and beverage professionals worldwide identified disconnected systems and data as their biggest barrier to moving faster in 2026.[14]
- 15% of manufacturers said their data strategy was entirely aligned with their overall business strategy in 2024, while 31% said it was very closely aligned.[13]
- 61% of manufacturers reported having a corporate-wide governance plan, strategy or formal guidelines for how data is collected, organized, accessed and used in 2024.[13]
- 61% of supply-management organizations reported having a dedicated data-governance function in 2024, while 90% agreed that data governance was necessary.[15]
- 6% of food and beverage leaders reported fully integrated digital systems in 2025, despite 82% saying technology adoption was a strategic priority.[14]
- 69% of food and beverage companies still relied on spreadsheets and email for core operations in 2025, limiting standardized access and control of business data.[14]
KPIs in the agricultural machinery industry
- 1.69 recordable incidents per 100 employees was John Deere’s total recordable incident rate in fiscal 2024 worldwide.[16]
- 0.078 cubic meters per production-output hour was John Deere’s water-intensity KPI at water-stressed manufacturing locations in fiscal 2024.[16]
- 3.41 kilograms of waste per production-output hour was John Deere’s waste-intensity KPI in fiscal 2024 worldwide.[16]
- 12.12 lost-time incidents per 100 employees was John Deere’s lost-time frequency rate in fiscal 2024 worldwide.[16]
06 Statistics
Strategy & Growth
Trade and regional growth expectations frame the 2026–2035 outlook. The forecast CAGR is 5.9% for 2026–2035, with global agriculture equipment revenue projected to reach $201.2 billion by 2035.
Growth in the agricultural machinery industry
Differentiation in the agricultural machinery industry
- 17% of AGCO’s 2025 regional net sales came from North America.[9]
- 4 leading brands—Fendt, Massey Ferguson, PTx and Valtra—formed AGCO’s differentiated agricultural-machinery and precision-agriculture portfolio in 2024.[9]
- 67% of AGCO’s 2025 regional net sales came from Europe and the Middle East.[9]
- $7.06 billion of AGCO’s 2024 sales came from tractors, its largest reported major-product category.[9]
Mergers and acquisitions in the agricultural machinery industry
- 100% of CLAAS India’s shares were acquired by Yanmar Coromandel Agrisolutions in 2024.[18]
- $700 million was the announced value of AGCO’s 2024 sale of the majority of its Grain & Protein business to American Industrial Partners.[9]
- 51% of Taizhou CMR Machinery Co. Ltd. was acquired by A.M.A. in its 2025 purchase of C.M.R. Group’s agriculture division.[19]
- $1.954 billion was AGCO’s cash payment for Trimble’s agricultural business interests in the PTx Trimble joint venture completed in April 2024.[9]
Strategic partnerships in the agricultural machinery industry
- $1.954 billion was AGCO’s cash consideration for interests in the PTx Trimble joint venture completed in 2024.[9]
- April 2024 marked completion of AGCO and Trimble’s PTx Trimble agricultural-technology joint venture.[9]
- Rabobank was AGCO’s finance joint-venture partner for retail and wholesale agricultural-equipment financing in 2024.[9]
- 2,800 independent dealers and distributors supported AGCO’s alliance-based route to market across 140 countries in 2025.[9]
07 Statistics
People & Workforce
Workforce stability and training intensity are tracked alongside turnover rates. Deere recorded 16.2 training hours per full-time equivalent in 2024.
Hiring in the agricultural machinery industry
- 73,100 employees worked for Deere & Company worldwide at November 2, 2025, including 32,500 full-time production employees.[20]
- 27,000 Deere employees were located in the United States at November 2, 2025, including approximately 11,600 full-time production employees.[20]
- 22,000 global employees worked for AGCO in 2025.[9]
Employee retention in the agricultural machinery industry
- 1.64% was Kubota Corporation’s non-consolidated job turnover rate in 2024.[8]
- 6.9% was AGCO’s voluntary employee turnover rate in 2024, down from 7.5% in 2023.[21]
- 5.6% was Deere & Company’s voluntary employee turnover rate in 2024.[16]
- 4.3% was AGCO’s voluntary employee turnover rate in 2025, down from 6.9% in 2024.[22]
Remote Work in the agriculture and food production sector (sector benchmark)
- Across U.S. agriculture and food employers, 35% offered some type of remote-work arrangement in 2024, according to AgCareers’ industry hiring report.[23]
- Across U.S. agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, about 12% of workers worked remotely during October 2023–September 2024, including hybrid and fully remote work.[24]
- Across U.S. accommodation and food services, 4.8% of workers worked remotely in 2021, up from 1.9% in 2019 and 5.3% in 2020.[25]
- Across U.S. crop and animal production, 14.4% of workers worked remotely in 2021, compared with 14.7% in 2019 and 15.4% in 2020.[25]
Hybrid Work in the agriculture and food production sector (sector benchmark)
- 33% of Australian FMCG and agribusiness professionals reported working in hybrid arrangements in 2024.[26]
- Across employers discussed in a food-industry hybrid-work survey, about 90% had adopted some form of hybrid work, although the figure was not limited to agriculture and food production.[27]
- Among science-of-food professionals surveyed in 2024, 36% reported having no work-at-home days per week.[27]
- 13% of Australian FMCG and agribusiness professionals preferred full-time on-site work in 2024.[26]
- 84% of Australian agribusiness organisations planned no change to existing flexible or hybrid work arrangements in 2026.[28]
Upskilling in the agricultural machinery industry
- 16.2 training hours per full-time equivalent were recorded by Deere & Company in 2024.[16]
- 11 sales staff competed in Kubota’s 2024 nationwide solution-proposal contest to strengthen customer-solution skills.[8]
- 100% of CNH Industrial employees were targeted for diversity-and-inclusion training by 2024 under its sustainability plan; 15% had completed it in 2021.[29]
- 100 women in Australia and New Zealand received sponsorship from CNH Industrial’s iGLOW employee group for professional development through NAWO in 2024.[29]
Employee Engagement in the agriculture and food production sector (sector benchmark)
- Employees in manufacture, distribution and storage organizations scored 60.9% on enablement in People Insight’s global benchmark data.[30]
- In the agriculture industry, employees averaged 7.68 out of 10 for engagement and an eNPS of +5 in CultureMonkey’s 2026 benchmark.[31]
- At Europe Snacks, a multinational food manufacturer, employee engagement reached 79% across its international workforce and 88% in its UK business after a structured listening program.[30]
- Manufacture, distribution and storage organizations recorded an average employee-engagement score of 72.9% in People Insight’s global benchmark data.[30]
- Employees in manufacture, distribution and storage organizations scored 59.3% on leadership in People Insight’s global benchmark data.[30]
DEI in the agricultural machinery industry
- 13.8% of Deere’s U.S. interns identified as Black or African American in 2024, compared with 7.7% in 2023.[16]
- 20% was CNH Industrial’s 2024 target for women in leadership roles.[29]
- 45% of Thailand’s agricultural workforce was female, cited by CNH Industrial in 2024 while describing its women-in-agriculture initiatives.[32]
- 11.7% of Deere’s U.S. interns identified as Hispanic or Latino in 2024.[16]
- 84.4% of Deere’s global production employees were covered by collective agreements in 2024.[16]
08 Statistics
Customer & Sales
Precision adoption and service response are reflected in survey results. In May 2026, 71% of CNH Industrial’s North American respondents said precision technology was important to their operation’s success.
Customer experience in the agricultural machinery industry
- 71% of CNH Industrial’s North American farmer and rancher respondents said precision technology was important to their operation’s success in May 2026.[1]
- 67.5 points was Kubota’s overall customer satisfaction score for Japanese agricultural-machinery dealers in the July 2022–June 2023 survey.[8]
- 98.3% was Kubota’s customer satisfaction index reported for its agricultural-machinery service response in Japan in 2025.[8]
- 67.7 points was Kubota’s overall customer satisfaction score for Japanese agricultural-machinery dealers in the July 2023–June 2024 survey.[8]
09 Statistics
Marketing & Brand
Purchase planning and brand-switching intent appear in customer survey behavior. In 2026, 26.6% of surveyed German farming businesses would consider switching brands for a 10% to 19% saving.
Marketing in the agricultural machinery industry
- 70% of Australian agricultural machinery purchasers rated customer service very important when choosing a machinery brand in 2020–2021.[33]
- 82.6% of surveyed German farming businesses planned to purchase large farm machinery within three to five years in 2026.[34]
- 67% of AGCO’s 2025 regional net sales came from Europe and the Middle East, with North America contributing 17%.[9]
- 2,800 independent dealers and distributors in 140 countries supported AGCO’s agricultural machinery marketing and distribution network in 2025.[21]
Digital marketing in the agricultural machinery industry
- 1 billion dollars was allocated to AGCO’s 2025 share-repurchase program, reflecting the company’s financial-marketing communication to investors.[21]
- FarmENGAGE, launched by AGCO in 2025, was designed to support mixed-fleet work planning, fieldwork tracking and test-data collection across machine brands.[21]
- Approximately 2,800 dealers and distributors in 140 countries used AGCO’s commercial network to market agricultural machinery and precision technologies in 2025.[21]
Branding in the agricultural machinery industry
- 26.6% of surveyed German farming businesses would consider switching agricultural machinery brands for a saving of 10% to 19% in 2026.[34]
- 59.2% of surveyed German farming businesses would consider switching brands for a saving of 20% to 29% in 2026.[34]
- 80.7% of surveyed German farming businesses did not rule out buying machinery from Asian manufacturers in 2026.[34]
- 42% of Australian agricultural machinery purchasers rated brand reputation or past experience very important when selecting a machinery brand in 2020–2021.[33]
Influencer Marketing in the agriculture and food production sector (sector benchmark)
- Food and drink influencer content produced an estimated $122 billion in earned media value globally in 2023.[35]
- Food and drink influencer content generated 392 billion impressions globally in 2023.[35]
- Food and drink influencer content involved 78,800 profiles globally in 2023, based on Sprout Social’s benchmark dataset.[35]
- Food and drink influencer content generated 42.7 billion engagements globally in 2023.[35]
- 11.5 million influencer posts covered food and drink globally in 2023, according to Sprout Social’s benchmark dataset.[35]
10 Statistics
Operations & Execution
Operational execution centers on supply, quality certification, and cost actions. AGCO reported about 5 months of supply for South American dealer inventory at the end of 2025 versus a three-month target.
Process optimization in the agricultural machinery industry
- 100% of Kubota’s 24 domestic production sites had ISO 9001 certification by May 1, 2026.[8]
- 47 of Kubota’s 72 manufacturing sites, or 65%, had obtained ISO 9001 certification by May 1, 2026.[8]
- 48% of Kubota’s 48 overseas production sites had ISO 9001 certification by May 1, 2026.[8]
- AGCO’s restructuring program was on track to reduce its cost base by up to $200 million through standardization, simplification and centralization in 2025.[21]
Operational efficiency in the agricultural machinery industry
- Nearly 50% was the year-on-year reduction in AGCO North American production during the third quarter of 2025.[36]
- 16% fewer production hours were used by AGCO in the second quarter of 2025 compared with the second quarter of 2024 while the company maintained margins.[36]
- $190 million was AGCO’s estimated run-rate savings at the end of 2025 from restructuring and efficiency actions.[36]
- 15% lower total cost of ownership was reported for CNH’s new-generation twin- and single-rotor combines launched in 2024.[32]
Quality management in the agricultural machinery industry
- $172 million of CNH’s 2025 agricultural R&D expense related to a non-cash impairment charge for R&D acquired through the Raven and Bennamann acquisitions.[29]
- 65% of Kubota’s manufacturing sites had ISO 9001 certification by May 1, 2026.[8]
- 48% of Kubota’s overseas production sites had ISO 9001 certification by May 1, 2026.[8]
- 100% of Kubota’s domestic production sites had ISO 9001 certification by May 1, 2026.[8]
Supply chain in the agricultural machinery industry
- About 5 months of supply was AGCO South American dealer inventory at the end of 2025, compared with a three-month target.[36]
- 12% was the decline in CNH Agriculture net sales in 2025, reflecting lower shipment volumes and weaker equipment demand.[1]
- 7 months of supply was AGCO’s North American dealer inventory at the end of 2025, compared with an eight-month level at the end of the third quarter.[36]
- More than 30% was the reduction in AGCO North American dealer inventory units during 2025.[36]
Outsourcing / Offshoring in the agriculture and food production sector (sector benchmark)
- 85% of Canadian food and beverage companies processed or manufactured products internally in 2020, while 13% both produced internally and outsourced production.[37]
- 19% of surveyed Queensland food-processing businesses contracted work out in 2010, while 28% contracted work in and 15% did both.[38]
- 2% of Canadian food and beverage companies outsourced production entirely to third-party manufacturers in 2020.[37]
- 66% of Queensland food-processing businesses engaged in contract manufacturing to some extent in 2010, including contracting work in or out.[38]
- 49% of U.S. growers surveyed outsourced at least some farm work to third-party service providers in 2022, with spraying services the most commonly outsourced activity.[39]
11 Statistics
Finance & Pricing
Margins and dealer economics connect to price and demand pressure. Dealer service rates generally ranged from $130 to $200 per hour in 2024 in the FTC’s 2025 complaint.
Pricing strategy in the agricultural machinery industry
- 28% of Australian agricultural machinery purchasers rated machinery price very important when choosing a brand in 2020–2021.[33]
- 30% of Australian agricultural machinery purchasers rated machinery price very important when choosing a dealer in 2020–2021.[33]
- 59.2% of surveyed German farming businesses would consider switching agricultural machinery brands for a 20% to 29% price saving in 2026.[34]
- 26.6% of surveyed German farming businesses would consider switching agricultural machinery brands for a 10% to 19% price saving in 2026.[34]
Cost reduction in the agricultural machinery industry
- $65 million was AGCO’s reported savings benefit in 2025 from restructuring and efficiency initiatives.[36]
- $40 million to $60 million was AGCO’s expected additional savings for 2026 from restructuring and efficiency initiatives.[36]
- $175 million to $200 million was AGCO’s targeted improvement in selling, general and administrative expenses from focused efficiency initiatives.[40]
- $100 million to $125 million was AGCO’s targeted annual restructuring run-rate saving by the end of 2025.[40]
Profitability in the agricultural machinery industry
- 6.2% was CNH Agriculture’s adjusted EBIT margin in 2025, down from 10.5% in 2024.[1]
- $772 million was CNH Agriculture’s adjusted EBIT in 2025, down 47% from 2024.[1]
- $12.39 billion was CNH Agriculture’s net sales in 2025, down 12% from 2024.[1]
- ¥265.5 billion was Kubota’s operating profit in 2025, down 15.9% from the prior year.[8]
Financial planning in the agricultural machinery industry
- $740 million was AGCO’s 2025 free cash flow, a company record.[21]
- $1 billion was AGCO’s authorized share-repurchase program announced in 2025.[21]
- $817 million was CNH’s industrial free cash flow in the fourth quarter of 2025.[1]
- $487.7 million was AGCO’s research and development spending in 2025.[21]
12 Statistics
Product & Service
Technology and circularity show up through R&D allocation and remanufacturing targets. AGCO targeted an 18% increase in remanufacturing revenue by 2028 from its 2025 base year.
Product development in the agricultural machinery industry
- 47% of AGCO’s research-and-development spending went to smart machines and clean technology in 2025 worldwide.[21]
- 4.27% of sales was CLAAS’s research-and-development intensity in 2006, among major agricultural-machinery manufacturers globally.[4]
- $487.7 million was AGCO’s research-and-development spending in 2025 worldwide.[9]
- $488 million was AGCO’s research-and-development and engineering investment in 2025 worldwide.[21]
Product lifecycle in the agricultural machinery industry
- Around 90% of greenhouse-gas emissions from Kubota agricultural tractors occur during the use stage over the assessed lifecycle in France.[8]
- 5,000 hours was the assumed operating time used in Kubota’s tractor lifecycle assessment for France.[8]
- 18% is AGCO’s target increase in remanufacturing revenue by 2028 from its 2025 base year worldwide.[21]
- 90% of lifecycle greenhouse-gas emissions occur during manufacturing and construction for Kubota’s assessed ductile-iron-pipe product, illustrating the company’s product-lifecycle comparison.[8]
After-sales in the agricultural machinery industry
Value proposition in the agricultural machinery industry
- 70% of surveyed U.S. and Canadian farmers cited saving time and improving labor efficiency as a primary reason for adopting precision technology in 2026.[1]
- 59% of surveyed U.S. and Canadian farmers cited increasing yields as a primary reason for adopting precision technology in 2026.[1]
- 62% of surveyed U.S. and Canadian farmers said their precision technology delivered moderate or extremely high value in 2026.[1]
- 74% of surveyed U.S. and Canadian farmers cited reducing input costs as a primary reason for adopting precision technology in 2026.[1]
13 Statistics
Sustainability & Ethics
Sustainability targets are stated alongside emissions and energy intensity metrics. AGCO set a 60% target renewable-energy use across manufacturing operations for 2026.
Sustainability in the agricultural machinery industry
- 60% renewable-energy use across manufacturing operations is AGCO’s target for 2026.[21]
- 60% was Kubota’s reported improvement in CO2 emissions per unit of production at global production sites versus its 2014 base year.[8]
- 65% of John Deere’s electricity came from renewable sources in fiscal 2024 worldwide.[16]
- 27% of John Deere’s total energy came from renewable sources in fiscal 2024 worldwide.[16]
ESG in the agricultural machinery industry
- Second place was CNH Industrial’s ranking in the Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry category of S&P Global’s 2025 Sustainability Yearbook.[1]
- 79 out of 100 was CNH Industrial’s score in S&P Global’s 2025 Sustainability Yearbook assessment.[1]
- 74.2% of Kubota’s 2025 production-related CO2 emissions came from its Farm and Industrial Machinery business.[8]
- 510 kilotons of CO2e were Kubota’s total reported production-related emissions in fiscal 2025.[8]
CSR in the agricultural machinery industry
- 1 July 2026 was the launch date of CNH’s Sustainable Environment Solution initiative addressing stubble burning in South India.[32]
- 210 days was the longest reported machinery-repair time among Ethiopian agricultural-mechanization service providers in the CGIAR study.[42]
- 261 agricultural-mechanization service providers participated in the CGIAR study of machinery hire-service models in Ethiopia.[42]
- 1 day was the shortest reported machinery-repair time among Ethiopian agricultural-mechanization service providers in the CGIAR study.[42]
Circular economy in the agricultural machinery industry
- 90% is AGCO’s target reduction in absolute Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 2050 versus its 2022 base year.[21]
- 55% is AGCO’s target reduction in absolute Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 2033 versus its 2022 base year, supported by product and operational circularity measures.[21]
- 2024 was the year AGCO reported investing in improved remanufacturing testing capabilities at its Linnavuori, Finland, facility.[43]
Carbon footprint in the agricultural machinery industry
- 81.736 million metric tons of CO2e were John Deere’s Scope 3 Category 1 and Category 11 emissions in fiscal 2024 worldwide.[16]
- 510 kilotons of CO2e were Kubota’s total production-related emissions in fiscal 2025.[8]
- 577,900 metric tons of CO2e were John Deere’s Scope 1 and 2 market-based emissions in fiscal 2024 worldwide.[16]
- 76.204 million metric tons of CO2e were John Deere’s Scope 3 emissions from use of sold products in fiscal 2024 worldwide.[16]
14 Statistics
Risk, Compliance & Legal
Regulatory access to diagnostics and repair resources is central in 2026. In July 2026, Deere was required to provide repair resources for 10 years equivalent to those available to authorized dealers.
Compliance in the agricultural machinery industry
- 1.0 was AGCO’s target global total case incident rate for 2025, compared with 0.89 actually recorded in 2024.[9]
- 140 countries are covered by AGCO’s international operations, exposing the agricultural-machinery company to multiple tax, trade and regulatory regimes.[9]
- 52% was the approximate year-on-year reduction in AGCO’s global workplace total case incident rate in 2024.[9]
- 0.89 total case incident rate was reported by AGCO globally in 2024, down approximately 52% from 1.86 in 2023.[9]
Risk Management in the agriculture and food production sector (sector benchmark)
- Across global food, beverage and agriculture companies, 44% were concerned about supply-chain vulnerabilities in 2026.[44]
- Across global food, beverage and agriculture companies, 84% said managing environmental, social and governance risks would be a priority over the next two years in 2026.[44]
- Across global food, beverage and agriculture companies, 62% felt in control of their key risks in 2026, based on a survey of 450 senior decision-makers.[44]
- Across global food, beverage and agriculture companies, 45% identified food safety and health as a top risk in 2026.[44]
Cybersecurity in the agriculture and food production sector (sector benchmark)
- Food and agriculture organizations represented 9.3% of CL0P’s reported ransomware attacks in 2025.[45]
- The global food and agriculture sector recorded 265 ransomware attacks in 2025, according to Food and Ag-ISAC tracking.[45]
- Food and Ag-ISAC’s ransomware database contained more than 15,000 recorded incidents across sectors by 2025, supporting sector-level threat tracking since 2020.[45]
- Food and agriculture accounted for 4.2% of all ransomware incidents recorded globally in 2025.[45]
Data Privacy in the agriculture and food production sector (sector benchmark)
- Across surveyed European Union farmers who shared data externally, 22% shared it with other farmers in 2025.[46]
- Across surveyed European Union farmers, 66% cited data privacy and security concerns as barriers to sharing farm data in 2025.[46]
- Across surveyed European Union farmers, 39% reported not sharing data electronically with external parties in 2025.[46]
- Across surveyed European Union farmers who shared data externally, 25% shared it with consultants or advisers in 2025.[46]
Crisis Management in the agriculture and food production sector (sector benchmark)
- Among Australian food and grocery companies surveyed in 2024, 53% conducted scenario planning for potential supply-chain disruptions, according to the 2025 report.[47]
- Among Australian food and grocery companies surveyed in 2024, 47% had business-continuity plans or playbooks identifying disruption triggers.[47]
- Among Australian food and grocery companies surveyed in 2024, 63% rated their crisis-management and recovery capability as moderately capable.[47]
- Among Australian food and grocery companies surveyed in 2024, 23% rated their crisis-management and recovery capability as fully capable.[47]
Governance in the agricultural machinery industry
- 14% of AGCO full-time senior vice-president and vice-president positions were held by women in 2024.[9]
- 8 independent directors served on AGCO’s board in 2025, compared with 1 non-independent director.[21]
- 22% of AGCO directors were ethnically diverse in 2025, compared with 30% in 2024 and 2023.[21]
- 33% of AGCO directors were women in 2025, up from 30% in both 2024 and 2023.[21]
15 Statistics
Globalization & Expansion
Channel footprint and trade share highlight how firms operate across markets. Asia-Pacific accounted for 38.1% of global agriculture equipment revenue in 2025.
Globalization in the agricultural machinery industry
- €11.1 billion was the 2024 sales value recorded by German agricultural-machinery and tractor manufacturers, down approximately 28% from 2023.[48]
- €6.8 billion was the approximate value of Italian agricultural-machinery exports in 2024, down 15.1% from 2023.[17]
- 57.4% of global agricultural-machinery trade was accounted for by EU-27 manufacturers in 2024, including intra-EU trade.[48]
- 2.03 million tractors were registered worldwide in 2024, an 8% decrease from 2023.[17]
Supplier management in the agricultural machinery industry
- 2,600 dealer owners were included in CNH Industrial’s agriculture dealer network at December 31, 2023.[9]
- 6,200 locations or points of sale were included in CNH Industrial’s agricultural dealer network at December 31, 2023.[9]
- 2,700 independent dealers and distributors supported AGCO’s agricultural-machinery distribution network in approximately 140 countries in 2024.[9]
- Approximately 2,800 independent dealers and distributors represented AGCO’s channel network across 140 countries in 2025.[9]
Stakeholder management in the agricultural machinery industry
- 18% of AGCO’s full-time management-level employees were women in 2024.[9]
- $1 billion was the share-repurchase program AGCO planned to create as part of its 2025 strategy.[9]
- 8 independent directors formed the majority of AGCO’s board in 2025, supporting oversight of farmer, employee and investor interests.[21]
- Approximately 22,000 employees worked for AGCO globally in 2025.[9]
Distribution channels in the agricultural machinery industry
- Approximately 2,050 independent dealer locations marketed John Deere products in the United States and Canada in 2025.[9]
- Approximately 2,700 independent dealers and distributors sold most AGCO products across approximately 140 countries in 2024.[9]
- More than 100 countries were served by John Deere agriculture and turf distributors and dealers outside the United States and Canada in 2025.[9]
- Approximately 1,600 of John Deere’s 2,050 U.S. and Canadian independent dealer locations sold agricultural equipment in 2025.[9]
Key questions about the agricultural machinery industry
What is the current market size for agricultural machinery in the latest full year?
How fast is the market expected to grow after 2026?
Which companies lead the agricultural machinery industry?
What technology shift stands out in adoption and spending behavior?
How fragmented is the US market, and how concentrated is production?
How are repair rules changing the competitive landscape for access to diagnostics and repair resources?
Cite This Report
This report is designed to be cited. We maintain stable URLs and versioned verification dates. Copy the format appropriate for your publication below.
Samuel Norberg. (2026, November 11). Agricultural Machinery Industry Statistics. Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/agricultural-machinery-industry-statistics
Samuel Norberg. "Agricultural Machinery Industry Statistics." Gitnux, 11 Nov 2026, https://gitnux.org/agricultural-machinery-industry-statistics.
Samuel Norberg. 2026. "Agricultural Machinery Industry Statistics." Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/agricultural-machinery-industry-statistics.
Sources & references
63 sources cited across this report
investors.cnh.com
ec.europa.eu
- e-fi.de
ers.usda.gov
mckinsey.com
monitor-industrial-ecosystems.ec.europa.eu
oecd.org
kubota.com
sec.gov
gao.gov
ag.purdue.edu
dnb.com
- manufacturingleadershipcouncil.com
tracegains.com
utah.ismworld.org
deere.com
federunacoma.it
yanmar.com
- cmr-agri.it
s22.q4cdn.com
agcocorp.com
stocktitan.net
m.agcareers.com
govinfo.gov
bls.gov
- 3ppartners.com
ift.org
- rimfireresources.com.au
cnh.com
peopleinsight.co.uk
culturemonkey.io
media.cnh.com
- accc.gov.au
mhp.com
media.sproutsocial.com
news.agcocorp.com
- fpsc-ctac.com
- business.qld.gov.au
- 1557649.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net
investors.agcocorp.com
dbpia.co.kr
oar.icrisat.org
- financialfilings.com
wtwco.com
- foodandag-isac.org
publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu
- afgc.org.au
vdma.eu
gminsights.com
grandviewresearch.com
euromonitor.com
powersys.com
search.ftc.gov
farmdocdaily.illinois.edu
ftc.gov
mahindra.com
international.sonalika.com
- en.lovol.com
annualreport.claas.com
tafe.com
- kuhn.com
newsroom.aem.org
nass.usda.gov

Social media in the agricultural machinery industry