When steel tariffs added a staggering billion-dollar surcharge to the cost of building an American car overnight, they set off a domino effect of price hikes, job cuts, and retaliatory trade wars that have left the auto industry forever changed.
Key Takeaways
- In 2018, the US imposed a 25% tariff on steel imports which increased US auto manufacturing costs by an estimated $200 to $300 per vehicle according to the Center for Automotive Research
- A 10% US tariff on imported autos from Mexico under USMCA considerations led to a projected $3 billion annual cost increase for US automakers in 2020
- EU retaliatory tariffs on US vehicles post-2018 steel tariffs reduced US auto exports to Europe by 18% valued at $1.2 billion in losses
- In Q1 2019, US auto production fell 1.2% due to tariff-induced steel price hikes of 30%
- Steel tariffs caused a 12% rise in US steel prices, delaying 50,000 auto vehicles production in 2018
- US auto plants in Mexico increased output by 15% post-tariffs to avoid US import duties
- US auto industry employment peaked at 1.03 million in 2018 pre-tariffs but fell to 1.01 million by 2020
- Section 232 tariffs led to 1,800 job losses in US steel-using auto sectors vs 300 gains in steel mills
- Auto tariffs threatened 100,000 jobs in Michigan auto assembly plants in 2019, per UAW
- US auto imports from Mexico reached $100 billion in 2022, up 20% despite tariff threats
- US steel imports dropped 27% in 2019 due to 25% tariffs, benefiting domestic auto suppliers
- Chinese auto imports to US plummeted 80% after 27.5% tariffs in 2019, from $1.1B to $200M
- US Section 232 tariffs set at 25% on steel effective March 2018
- Section 301 tariffs on Chinese autos and parts at 25% from May 2019 on $110B goods
- US proposed 25% tariff on all imported autos under Section 232 in 2019, later paused
Tariffs raise car prices and cost the auto industry jobs and revenue.
Economic Impact
- In 2018, the US imposed a 25% tariff on steel imports which increased US auto manufacturing costs by an estimated $200 to $300 per vehicle according to the Center for Automotive Research
- A 10% US tariff on imported autos from Mexico under USMCA considerations led to a projected $3 billion annual cost increase for US automakers in 2020
- EU retaliatory tariffs on US vehicles post-2018 steel tariffs reduced US auto exports to Europe by 18% valued at $1.2 billion in losses
- China's 40% tariff on US-made autos contributed to a 37% drop in US auto exports to China in 2019, equating to $7.5 billion in lost revenue
- Proposed 25% US tariffs on imported autos in 2024 could raise new car prices by $2,700 on average per vehicle, per Anderson Economic Group analysis
- Steel tariffs added $1 billion in extra costs to the US auto industry in 2019 alone, according to Auto Care Association
- A 25% tariff on auto imports would reduce US GDP by 0.2% or $42 billion annually, per Tax Foundation modeling
- Tariffs on aluminum raised US light vehicle production costs by 1.3% or $150 per vehicle in 2019
- US auto tariffs during trade war increased consumer prices for pickup trucks by 10%, adding $1,300 to average price
- Retaliatory tariffs cost US auto exporters $2.4 billion in 2019 from Canada and Mexico combined
- 2024 proposed 100% tariffs on Chinese EVs projected to save 20,000 US jobs but cost consumers $1,200 per vehicle
- Steel tariffs led to 2,000 net job losses in US auto supply chain by 2020, offset by minimal gains elsewhere
- Auto tariffs under Section 301 raised import costs by 25% on $34 billion of Chinese parts in 2019
- EU auto tariffs at 10% on US imports create $4.5 billion trade barrier annually
- US tariffs on Canada steel disrupted auto supply chains, adding 0.5% to vehicle costs or $75 million total
- Proposed Trump tariffs could shrink US auto sales by 2 million units annually, per Cox Automotive
- Aluminum tariffs increased US can and auto part costs by 20%, totaling $900 million impact
- Trade war tariffs reduced US auto industry profits by 15% in 2019
- 25% tariff scenario on autos would add $86 billion to household transportation costs over 10 years
- Mexican auto exports to US faced 2.5% tariff hike, costing $1.1 billion in 2020
Economic Impact Interpretation
This analysis reveals the stark irony of protectionism: in the desperate scramble to shield the auto industry, tariffs have become a self-inflicted wound, methodically inflating costs, eroding profits, strangling exports, and ultimately passing the bill to American consumers and workers in a costly cycle of economic friendly fire.
Employment Effects
- US auto industry employment peaked at 1.03 million in 2018 pre-tariffs but fell to 1.01 million by 2020
- Section 232 tariffs led to 1,800 job losses in US steel-using auto sectors vs 300 gains in steel mills
- Auto tariffs threatened 100,000 jobs in Michigan auto assembly plants in 2019, per UAW
- Retaliatory tariffs cost 12,000 US auto export-related jobs in Midwest states by 2020
- Proposed 25% auto tariffs could eliminate 400,000 US auto jobs over 5 years, Tax Foundation estimate
- Steel tariffs saved 8,700 steel jobs but caused 75,000 losses in auto manufacturing
- USMCA tariff rules added 50,000 jobs in Mexican auto plants, displacing some US roles
- Chinese tariffs on US autos led to 2,500 layoffs at US plants exporting to China in 2019
- Aluminum tariffs prompted 1,200 job cuts at US auto suppliers in Ohio and Pennsylvania
- Tariff uncertainty reduced auto hiring by 15% in Q4 2018, affecting 20,000 positions
- EU tariffs post-US steel duties threatened 10,000 jobs at US plants like GM in Tennessee
- 100% EV tariffs from China protected 15,000 US battery plant jobs projected by 2025
- Trade war tariffs increased US auto wage premiums by 3% to retain workers amid disruptions
- Mexican auto sector added 40,000 jobs post-US tariff threats to localize production
- US steel tariffs led to 3,000 furloughs in auto supply chain in summer 2018
- Auto industry lost 25,000 supplier jobs due to higher material costs from tariffs by 2021
- Tariffs boosted steel mill employment by 1,000 in auto-related regions but cut 5,000 downstream
- GM idled plants employing 6,000 workers in 2019 partly due to tariff costs
- US auto exports to China fell 90% post-tariffs, costing 4,000 export jobs
- Section 301 tariffs on auto parts supported 10,000 US jobs in domestic sourcing by 2022
Employment Effects Interpretation
While intended as a surgical tool, the cascading effects of tariffs have often resembled a game of economic Whack-a-Mole, where protecting one steel job can inadvertently clobber ten auto jobs down the line.
Policy and Tariff Rates
- US Section 232 tariffs set at 25% on steel effective March 2018
- Section 301 tariffs on Chinese autos and parts at 25% from May 2019 on $110B goods
- US proposed 25% tariff on all imported autos under Section 232 in 2019, later paused
- EU imposes 25% tariff on US steel and 10% on aluminum in retaliation June 2018
- China retaliatory tariffs up to 40% on US-made large engines and autos since July 2018
- USMCA requires 75% regional value content for autos to qualify for zero tariffs, effective 2020
- Biden admin quadrupled tariffs on Chinese EVs to 100% in May 2024 announcement
- Normal US tariff on passenger vehicles is 2.5%, light trucks 25% chicken tax legacy
- Canada imposed 25% tariffs on US steel in July 2018, lifted May 2019
- EU auto tariff on US cars at 10%, US on EU at 2.5%, ongoing WTO dispute
- Section 301 List 4B auto parts tariffs suspended until 2022, then at 7.5%
- Mexico retaliatory tariffs on US pork and cheese but spared autos in 2018
- Japan-US trade deal reduced some auto tariffs but kept 2.5% on cars
- Proposed 200% tariff on Chinese autos by Trump campaign in 2024 rhetoric
- WTO ruled US steel tariffs inconsistent, but US blocked compliance
- KORUS FTA eliminated 25% US truck tariff on Korean vehicles phased out by 2021
- India imposes 60-100% tariffs on imported autos, blocking US exports
- US granted tariff exclusions for 20,000 steel products used in autos by 2020
- Brazil auto import tariff at 35%, affecting US exports minimally
- UK post-Brexit aligned EU 10% auto tariff on US imports
Policy and Tariff Rates Interpretation
It appears the global automotive industry’s preferred vehicle of trade has become the tariff, a model that has reliably driven everyone further apart rather than bringing them together.
Production and Manufacturing
- In Q1 2019, US auto production fell 1.2% due to tariff-induced steel price hikes of 30%
- Steel tariffs caused a 12% rise in US steel prices, delaying 50,000 auto vehicles production in 2018
- US auto plants in Mexico increased output by 15% post-tariffs to avoid US import duties
- Aluminum tariffs led to 5% reduction in US auto body panel production capacity utilization in 2019
- Post-2018 tariffs, US light truck production rose 8% as firms shifted from sedans to tariff-exempt trucks
- Chinese EV production for export surged 25% in 2023 despite 100% US tariffs, totaling 1.2 million units
- US steel tariffs prompted Ford to cut F-150 production by 10,000 units in 2019 due to $1 billion cost hit
- Tariff exemptions for USMCA autos required 75% North American content, boosting regional production by 5%
- EU steel tariffs reduced German auto parts output by 3% in 2019, affecting 200,000 vehicles
- US auto manufacturing PMI dropped to 52.7 in March 2019 amid tariff uncertainty, lowest in 18 months
- Tariffs on imported engines increased US V8 engine production by 12% at domestic plants in 2020
- Mexico's auto production hit record 3.5 million vehicles in 2022 to circumvent potential US tariffs
- Steel price volatility from tariffs idled 15 US auto supplier plants for over 2 weeks in 2018
- Post-tariff, BMW shifted 10% more production to Spartanburg US plant from Germany, adding 50,000 units
- US aluminum tariffs raised sheet prices 25%, cutting beverage can production for autos by 8%
- Trade war led to 20% drop in US imports of Chinese auto glass, boosting domestic output by 150,000 units
- Tariff-induced supply chain shifts increased US plastic parts production by 7% in 2019
- Honda relocated Civic production from Canada to Indiana post-tariffs, adding 120,000 units capacity
- Steel tariffs caused 4% decline in US stamping capacity utilization for auto bodies in Q2 2019
Production and Manufacturing Interpretation
The statistics paint a picture of trade policy as a clumsy bulldozer: while it haphazardly reshuffles production lines and shifts auto plants like pieces on a geopolitical chessboard, the overall costs—from idled factories to higher prices and missed targets—often outweigh the protected gains.
Trade and Import/Export Volumes
- US auto imports from Mexico reached $100 billion in 2022, up 20% despite tariff threats
- US steel imports dropped 27% in 2019 due to 25% tariffs, benefiting domestic auto suppliers
- Chinese auto imports to US plummeted 80% after 27.5% tariffs in 2019, from $1.1B to $200M
- EU exported 700,000 vehicles to US in 2023 despite 2.5% tariff, valued at $30 billion
- US auto exports to Canada fell 15% or $5 billion post-2018 tariffs retaliation
- Mexico supplied 2.5 million vehicles to US market in 2022, 25% of total imports
- US aluminum imports declined 10% in 2019 due to tariffs, shifting $2B to domestic sources
- Post-tariff, US auto parts imports from China dropped 25% to $15 billion in 2020
- German auto exports to US hit 500,000 units in 2021, facing potential 25% tariff risk
- US vehicle exports totaled 2.4 million units in 2022, down 5% from pre-tariff peaks
- Canada's auto trade surplus with US was $20 billion in 2023 despite tariff pauses
- EV imports from China blocked by 100% tariffs saved $4 billion in potential imports by 2024
- US imported $170 billion in autos and parts in 2023, 30% from Mexico, 20% Canada
- Steel tariffs reduced US imports by 1.4 million tons in first year, aiding auto localization
- Japan exported 1.4 million vehicles to US in 2022 under 2.5% tariff, $50B value
- Retaliatory tariffs cut US exports to EU by $3B in autos in 2019
- US-China auto trade deficit widened to $25B in 2021 despite tariffs
- South Korea auto exports to US stable at 700,000 units under KORUS zero tariff
- US auto parts trade hit $200B imports vs $70B exports in 2022
- Tariffs on Turkey steel affected $500M in auto imports, minor volume shift
Trade and Import/Export Volumes Interpretation
The data shows tariffs act like a clumsy game of economic whack-a-mole, where smashing one trading partner's imports only to see another's surge ensures the overall auto industry bill stays painfully high, proving protectionism is less a shield and more a self-inflicted wound in a globally interconnected market.
Sources & References
- Reference 1CARGROUPcargroup.orgVisit source
- Reference 2BROOKINGSbrookings.eduVisit source
- Reference 3PIIEpiie.comVisit source
- Reference 4USITCusitc.govVisit source
- Reference 5ANDERSONECONOMICGROUPandersoneconomicgroup.comVisit source
- Reference 6AUTOCAREautocare.orgVisit source
- Reference 7TAXFOUNDATIONtaxfoundation.orgVisit source
- Reference 8BLSbls.govVisit source
- Reference 9NBERnber.orgVisit source
- Reference 10USCHAMBERuschamber.comVisit source
- Reference 11CFRcfr.orgVisit source
- Reference 12EPIepi.orgVisit source
- Reference 13USTRustr.govVisit source
- Reference 14ECec.europa.euVisit source
- Reference 15CBCcbc.caVisit source
- Reference 16COXAUTOINCcoxautoinc.comVisit source
- Reference 17GMFUSgmfus.orgVisit source
- Reference 18DELOITTEwww2.deloitte.comVisit source
- Reference 19AMERICANACTIONFORUMamericanactionforum.orgVisit source
- Reference 20WILSONCENTERwilsoncenter.orgVisit source
- Reference 21AUTONEWSautonews.comVisit source
- Reference 22FREIGHTWAVESfreightwaves.comVisit source
- Reference 23REUTERSreuters.comVisit source
- Reference 24SPGLOBALspglobal.comVisit source
- Reference 25IEAiea.orgVisit source
- Reference 26DETROITNEWSdetroitnews.comVisit source
- Reference 27CSIScsis.orgVisit source
- Reference 28VDAvda.deVisit source
- Reference 29MARKITECONOMICSmarkiteconomics.comVisit source
- Reference 30WARDSAUTOwardsauto.comVisit source
- Reference 31INAESinaes.org.mxVisit source
- Reference 32SUPPLYCHAINDIVEsupplychaindive.comVisit source
- Reference 33BMWGROUPbmwgroup.comVisit source
- Reference 34ALUMINUMaluminum.orgVisit source
- Reference 35GLASSMAGAZINEglassmagazine.comVisit source
- Reference 36PLASTICSINDUSTRYplasticsindustry.orgVisit source
- Reference 37STEELMILLSUPPLIERSsteelmillsuppliers.comVisit source
- Reference 38UAWuaw.orgVisit source
- Reference 39MIDWESTPOLICYmidwestpolicy.orgVisit source
- Reference 40FEDERALRESERVEfederalreserve.govVisit source
- Reference 41FREEPfreep.comVisit source
- Reference 42MANUFACTURINGDIVEmanufacturingdive.comVisit source
- Reference 43NADAnada.orgVisit source
- Reference 44TENNESSEANtennessean.comVisit source
- Reference 45ENERGYenergy.govVisit source
- Reference 46INEGIinegi.org.mxVisit source
- Reference 47CRAINSCLEVELANDcrainscleveland.comVisit source
- Reference 48MAPImapi.netVisit source
- Reference 49CNBCcnbc.comVisit source
- Reference 50ALLIANCEFORAUTOMOTIVEINNOVATIONallianceforautomotiveinnovation.orgVisit source
- Reference 51CENSUScensus.govVisit source
- Reference 52COMMERCEcommerce.govVisit source
- Reference 53TRADEtrade.govVisit source
- Reference 54INTERNATIONALinternational.gc.caVisit source
- Reference 55OICAoica.netVisit source
- Reference 56USGSusgs.govVisit source
- Reference 57BEAbea.govVisit source
- Reference 58TRANSPORTATIONtransportation.govVisit source
- Reference 59STATCANwww150.statcan.gc.caVisit source
- Reference 60JAMAjama.orgVisit source
- Reference 61USCHINAuschina.orgVisit source
- Reference 62AAIIaaii.orgVisit source
- Reference 63WHITEHOUSEwhitehouse.govVisit source
- Reference 64FEDERALREGISTERfederalregister.govVisit source
- Reference 65TRADEtrade.ec.europa.euVisit source
- Reference 66MOFCOMmofcom.gov.cnVisit source
- Reference 67WTOwto.orgVisit source
- Reference 68CANADAcanada.caVisit source
- Reference 69GOBgob.mxVisit source
- Reference 70NYTIMESnytimes.comVisit source
- Reference 71COMMERCEcommerce.gov.inVisit source
- Reference 72BISbis.doc.govVisit source
- Reference 73MDICmdic.gov.brVisit source
- Reference 74GOVgov.ukVisit source