Key Takeaways
- 59% of companies cite sustainability as a factor influencing their technology purchases (cloud/IT included), relevant to payment infrastructure energy and emissions
- 36% of consumers report they have increased their use of online services, which can reduce physical logistics and related emissions for payments-enabled commerce
- Global payments and cards market size is projected to reach $14.3 trillion by 2027, providing scale context for transaction-volume-linked sustainability impacts
- On average, data center energy efficiency improved by 15% from 2010 to 2018, which can reduce emissions per unit of compute used for payment systems
- The IPCC AR6 estimates that direct global carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels and industry fell by about 1–2% from 2022 to 2023, highlighting the need for continued reductions across sectors like finance and payments
- Global ESG assets reached $35.3 trillion in 2020 (US SIF methodology), demonstrating scale of sustainability-reporting pressures on financial firms
- The EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) requires disclosure of principal adverse impacts (PAI) on sustainability factors for covered financial market participants from 2023 onward for many entities
- The EU NFRD was repealed and replaced by CSRD under Directive (EU) 2022/2464, expanding the population of companies required to report sustainability information
- The share of global contactless transactions is projected to surpass 70% of in-store card payments in 2027, enabling reduced time/energy per transaction compared with cash where implemented
- The global digital payments market is projected to reach $14.2 trillion by 2026, reflecting growth in online payments that shift impacts from logistics toward data center/cloud usage
- The global mobile payment user base is projected to reach 1.67 billion by 2027, increasing adoption of app-based payment rails and reducing the need for physical infrastructure
- Corporate renewable electricity procurement reached 2,000 TWh globally in 2022 (IEA estimate), relevant to reducing emissions from data centers used for payments
- A typical lifecycle analysis indicates that switching to energy-efficient servers can reduce total carbon footprint by up to 20% versus less efficient configurations (study of data center hardware), relevant for payment IT refresh
- IBM’s report states that sustainable IT can reduce energy consumption and emissions; IBM’s 'Greenhouse Gas Emissions' progress includes tracked reductions of operational emissions (Scope 1 and 2) where applicable
Sustainability is shaping payments as cloud energy gains, greener data centers, and growing digital use cut per transaction emissions.
Related reading
- Supply Chain In IndustrySupply Chain In The Payments Industry Statistics
- Sustainability In IndustrySustainability In The Financial Service Industry Statistics
- Finance Financial ServicesPayments Fintech Banking Industry Statistics
- Sustainability In IndustrySustainability In The Motion Picture Industry Statistics
01 · Category
Consumer Demand2 stats
Consumer Demand Interpretation
02 · Category
Emissions & Footprint6 stats
Emissions & Footprint Interpretation
03 · Category
Regulation & Reporting6 stats
Regulation & Reporting Interpretation
More related reading
04 · Category
Industry Trends7 stats
Industry Trends Interpretation
05 · Category
Operational Metrics3 stats
Operational Metrics Interpretation
Cite This Report
This report is designed to be cited. We maintain stable URLs and versioned verification dates. Copy the format appropriate for your publication below.
Min-ji Park. (2026, February 13). Sustainability In The Payments Industry Statistics. Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/sustainability-in-the-payments-industry-statistics
Min-ji Park. "Sustainability In The Payments Industry Statistics." Gitnux, 13 Feb 2026, https://gitnux.org/sustainability-in-the-payments-industry-statistics.
Min-ji Park. 2026. "Sustainability In The Payments Industry Statistics." Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/sustainability-in-the-payments-industry-statistics.
Sources & references
24 datasets cited across this report · attribution is report-level
+7 additional datasets cited (not shown individually)

