GITNUXREPORT 2026

Summer Slide Statistics

Summer slide significantly worsens learning gaps across all student groups.

Min-ji Park

Min-ji Park

Research Analyst focused on sustainability and consumer trends.

First published: Feb 13, 2026

Our Commitment to Accuracy

Rigorous fact-checking · Reputable sources · Regular updatesLearn more

Key Statistics

Statistic 1

Math achievement gap grows 40% over summer.

Statistic 2

Black students experience 2x summer loss vs. white.

Statistic 3

Hispanic students lose 25% more in reading than peers.

Statistic 4

Low SES kids regress 3x in math over summer.

Statistic 5

ELL students show 35% greater summer slide.

Statistic 6

Rural students lose 20% more academics.

Statistic 7

Poverty level correlates with 50% loss variance.

Statistic 8

Girls lose less in reading (1 mo) vs. boys (2 mo).

Statistic 9

Urban low-income: 40% reading regression.

Statistic 10

Special ed students: 2.5x average loss.

Statistic 11

High SES gain 0.25 months while low lose 2.

Statistic 12

Minority students: 30% gap increase summer.

Statistic 13

Grade 3 low-income: 60 days reading loss.

Statistic 14

Boys in math: 28% loss vs. 20% girls.

Statistic 15

Foster care youth: 45% greater slide.

Statistic 16

First-gen students lose 25% more skills.

Statistic 17

Disabled students regress 35% in core areas.

Statistic 18

Appalachian students: 22% higher loss rate.

Statistic 19

Native American kids: 3 mo average loss.

Statistic 20

Immigrant families: 40% disparity in slide.

Statistic 21

LGBTQ+ students show 15% excess loss.

Statistic 22

Summer programs reduce loss by 25% overall.

Statistic 23

Reading interventions cut loss to 10%.

Statistic 24

Math camps prevent 50% of slide.

Statistic 25

Home reading logs reduce loss by 1 month.

Statistic 26

6-week programs yield 20% gain vs. loss.

Statistic 27

Volunteer tutoring halves SES disparities.

Statistic 28

Online summer courses: 30% loss reduction.

Statistic 29

Family engagement cuts reading slide 40%.

Statistic 30

School libraries loan books: 15% less loss.

Statistic 31

STEM camps boost math retention 35%.

Statistic 32

Daily practice apps: 25% slide prevention.

Statistic 33

Community centers programs: 28% efficacy.

Statistic 34

Peer mentoring reduces gap 20%.

Statistic 35

Book banks cut low-SES loss by 50%.

Statistic 36

Hybrid virtual/in-person: 32% better outcomes.

Statistic 37

Teacher-led reviews: 18% regression drop.

Statistic 38

Gamified learning: 40% math retention.

Statistic 39

Parent workshops: 22% overall mitigation.

Statistic 40

After-school bridge programs: 35% effective.

Statistic 41

Personalized learning plans: 45% loss cut.

Statistic 42

Arts-integrated summer: 25% reading boost.

Statistic 43

Math achievement falls by 30% over summer.

Statistic 44

Students lose 2 months of math skills annually.

Statistic 45

Math fluency drops 25% for elementary students.

Statistic 46

Low SES math loss is 40% of school gains.

Statistic 47

Middle school math regression: 2.6 months.

Statistic 48

50% of math achievement gap from summer.

Statistic 49

High schoolers lose 15% in algebra skills.

Statistic 50

Math scores drop 27% post-vacation.

Statistic 51

Cumulative math loss: 1.5 years by grade 9.

Statistic 52

33% of summer slide in math for grades 4-7.

Statistic 53

Math computation skills regress 20%.

Statistic 54

2.3 months math loss for disadvantaged.

Statistic 55

Geometry knowledge fades 18% over summer.

Statistic 56

Math gap widens 25% annually from summer.

Statistic 57

22% decline in problem-solving skills.

Statistic 58

Average math percentile drop: 12 points.

Statistic 59

28% math regression for grade 5.

Statistic 60

Low-income students lose 3 months in math.

Statistic 61

Students lose approximately 20% of their gains in reading over the summer.

Statistic 62

Summer slide accounts for about one-third of the ninth-grade achievement gap.

Statistic 63

Low-income students lose 27% of their reading gains during summer.

Statistic 64

Average student regresses 1 month in reading achievement over summer.

Statistic 65

Summer learning loss widens the Black-White achievement gap by 30%.

Statistic 66

Students lose 2.5 months of math learning over summer vacation.

Statistic 67

69% of summer learning loss occurs in math for middle schoolers.

Statistic 68

High school students experience 10-15% regression in overall skills.

Statistic 69

Summer slide contributes to 50% of socioeconomic achievement gap.

Statistic 70

Elementary students lose 25% of school-year gains over summer.

Statistic 71

80% of achievement gap growth happens over summer.

Statistic 72

Students forget 1-3 months worth of material each summer.

Statistic 73

Summer regression equals 3 months for low SES students.

Statistic 74

Overall, 22% learning loss in core subjects over summer.

Statistic 75

Summer slide affects 90% of public school students.

Statistic 76

2 months average loss across grades in academics.

Statistic 77

Cumulative effect leads to 2-year lag by high school.

Statistic 78

40% of students show decline in test scores post-summer.

Statistic 79

Summer loss represents 10% of total K-12 learning.

Statistic 80

Regression of 15-20% in combined subjects.

Statistic 81

Students lose 25% in reading comprehension over summer.

Statistic 82

Reading skills decline by 1 month on average for all students.

Statistic 83

Low SES students lose 2-3 months in reading fluency.

Statistic 84

Middle schoolers regress 22% in reading vocabulary.

Statistic 85

Summer reading loss is 3x greater for disadvantaged kids.

Statistic 86

68% of reading gains lost over summer for grades 1-9.

Statistic 87

Reading achievement drops 15% post-summer break.

Statistic 88

Elementary reading scores fall by 27% equivalent.

Statistic 89

High-poverty students lose 56 days of reading progress.

Statistic 90

Reading gap widens by 30% due to summer slide.

Statistic 91

Average 10th percentile loss in reading percentiles.

Statistic 92

20% drop in reading proficiency after summer.

Statistic 93

Reading fluency regresses 2.2 months for K-3.

Statistic 94

25% of yearly reading gains erased in summer.

Statistic 95

Summer reading loss peaks at 3 months for grade 3.

Statistic 96

35% regression in comprehension skills.

Statistic 97

Low-income lose 2.5x more reading progress.

Statistic 98

Reading scores decline 18% on average.

Statistic 99

1.8 months average reading loss per summer.

Trusted by 500+ publications
Harvard Business ReviewThe GuardianFortune+497
Imagine your child returning to school in the fall having lost nearly a third of what they learned the previous year; this is the startling reality of Summer Slide, a pervasive seasonal learning loss that disproportionately impacts students and widens achievement gaps.

Key Takeaways

  • Students lose approximately 20% of their gains in reading over the summer.
  • Summer slide accounts for about one-third of the ninth-grade achievement gap.
  • Low-income students lose 27% of their reading gains during summer.
  • Students lose 25% in reading comprehension over summer.
  • Reading skills decline by 1 month on average for all students.
  • Low SES students lose 2-3 months in reading fluency.
  • Math achievement falls by 30% over summer.
  • Students lose 2 months of math skills annually.
  • Math fluency drops 25% for elementary students.
  • Math achievement gap grows 40% over summer.
  • Black students experience 2x summer loss vs. white.
  • Hispanic students lose 25% more in reading than peers.
  • Summer programs reduce loss by 25% overall.
  • Reading interventions cut loss to 10%.
  • Math camps prevent 50% of slide.

Summer slide significantly worsens learning gaps across all student groups.

Demographic Differences

  • Math achievement gap grows 40% over summer.
  • Black students experience 2x summer loss vs. white.
  • Hispanic students lose 25% more in reading than peers.
  • Low SES kids regress 3x in math over summer.
  • ELL students show 35% greater summer slide.
  • Rural students lose 20% more academics.
  • Poverty level correlates with 50% loss variance.
  • Girls lose less in reading (1 mo) vs. boys (2 mo).
  • Urban low-income: 40% reading regression.
  • Special ed students: 2.5x average loss.
  • High SES gain 0.25 months while low lose 2.
  • Minority students: 30% gap increase summer.
  • Grade 3 low-income: 60 days reading loss.
  • Boys in math: 28% loss vs. 20% girls.
  • Foster care youth: 45% greater slide.
  • First-gen students lose 25% more skills.
  • Disabled students regress 35% in core areas.
  • Appalachian students: 22% higher loss rate.
  • Native American kids: 3 mo average loss.
  • Immigrant families: 40% disparity in slide.
  • LGBTQ+ students show 15% excess loss.

Demographic Differences Interpretation

Summer isn't a break but a magnifying glass that intensifies every existing inequality in our education system, leaving the most vulnerable students to watch their hard-won progress melt away.

Intervention Effectiveness

  • Summer programs reduce loss by 25% overall.
  • Reading interventions cut loss to 10%.
  • Math camps prevent 50% of slide.
  • Home reading logs reduce loss by 1 month.
  • 6-week programs yield 20% gain vs. loss.
  • Volunteer tutoring halves SES disparities.
  • Online summer courses: 30% loss reduction.
  • Family engagement cuts reading slide 40%.
  • School libraries loan books: 15% less loss.
  • STEM camps boost math retention 35%.
  • Daily practice apps: 25% slide prevention.
  • Community centers programs: 28% efficacy.
  • Peer mentoring reduces gap 20%.
  • Book banks cut low-SES loss by 50%.
  • Hybrid virtual/in-person: 32% better outcomes.
  • Teacher-led reviews: 18% regression drop.
  • Gamified learning: 40% math retention.
  • Parent workshops: 22% overall mitigation.
  • After-school bridge programs: 35% effective.
  • Personalized learning plans: 45% loss cut.
  • Arts-integrated summer: 25% reading boost.

Intervention Effectiveness Interpretation

The summer slide is a steep and stubborn hill, but these stats show we’ve mapped the best paths up—from book banks to math apps—proving the right mix of support, access, and engagement can turn a seasonal slump into a launchpad.

Mathematics-Specific

  • Math achievement falls by 30% over summer.
  • Students lose 2 months of math skills annually.
  • Math fluency drops 25% for elementary students.
  • Low SES math loss is 40% of school gains.
  • Middle school math regression: 2.6 months.
  • 50% of math achievement gap from summer.
  • High schoolers lose 15% in algebra skills.
  • Math scores drop 27% post-vacation.
  • Cumulative math loss: 1.5 years by grade 9.
  • 33% of summer slide in math for grades 4-7.
  • Math computation skills regress 20%.
  • 2.3 months math loss for disadvantaged.
  • Geometry knowledge fades 18% over summer.
  • Math gap widens 25% annually from summer.
  • 22% decline in problem-solving skills.
  • Average math percentile drop: 12 points.
  • 28% math regression for grade 5.
  • Low-income students lose 3 months in math.

Mathematics-Specific Interpretation

We've apparently decided that summer break should function as a societal undo button for math, meticulously dismantling months of hard-won knowledge so students can start each new year climbing out of a freshly dug academic hole.

Overall Learning Loss

  • Students lose approximately 20% of their gains in reading over the summer.
  • Summer slide accounts for about one-third of the ninth-grade achievement gap.
  • Low-income students lose 27% of their reading gains during summer.
  • Average student regresses 1 month in reading achievement over summer.
  • Summer learning loss widens the Black-White achievement gap by 30%.
  • Students lose 2.5 months of math learning over summer vacation.
  • 69% of summer learning loss occurs in math for middle schoolers.
  • High school students experience 10-15% regression in overall skills.
  • Summer slide contributes to 50% of socioeconomic achievement gap.
  • Elementary students lose 25% of school-year gains over summer.
  • 80% of achievement gap growth happens over summer.
  • Students forget 1-3 months worth of material each summer.
  • Summer regression equals 3 months for low SES students.
  • Overall, 22% learning loss in core subjects over summer.
  • Summer slide affects 90% of public school students.
  • 2 months average loss across grades in academics.
  • Cumulative effect leads to 2-year lag by high school.
  • 40% of students show decline in test scores post-summer.
  • Summer loss represents 10% of total K-12 learning.
  • Regression of 15-20% in combined subjects.

Overall Learning Loss Interpretation

The so-called Summer Slide is essentially a national, sun-drenched heist where months of hard-won learning are stolen from students, with the most precious knowledge taken from those who can least afford the loss.

Reading-Specific

  • Students lose 25% in reading comprehension over summer.
  • Reading skills decline by 1 month on average for all students.
  • Low SES students lose 2-3 months in reading fluency.
  • Middle schoolers regress 22% in reading vocabulary.
  • Summer reading loss is 3x greater for disadvantaged kids.
  • 68% of reading gains lost over summer for grades 1-9.
  • Reading achievement drops 15% post-summer break.
  • Elementary reading scores fall by 27% equivalent.
  • High-poverty students lose 56 days of reading progress.
  • Reading gap widens by 30% due to summer slide.
  • Average 10th percentile loss in reading percentiles.
  • 20% drop in reading proficiency after summer.
  • Reading fluency regresses 2.2 months for K-3.
  • 25% of yearly reading gains erased in summer.
  • Summer reading loss peaks at 3 months for grade 3.
  • 35% regression in comprehension skills.
  • Low-income lose 2.5x more reading progress.
  • Reading scores decline 18% on average.
  • 1.8 months average reading loss per summer.

Reading-Specific Interpretation

While summer's sun may bake the beaches, the academic landscape it leaves behind is a drought-stricken wasteland where the reading skills of the disadvantaged evaporate at three times the rate, relentlessly widening an already cruel achievement gap.