
GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Legal Professional ServicesTop 10 Best Virtual Legal Secretary Services of 2026
Editorial roundup comparing virtual legal secretary services for law firms and solo counsel, including Time Etc and key tradeoffs.
How we ranked these tools
Vendors set the topic, but our editors set the inclusion criteria and the evaluation framework before research starts.
Search agents gather the source set and the review record, including transcriptions of video reviews and podcasts.
Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Time Etc is the best pick for firms that need steady admin motion across active matters because its calendaring and correspondence stay synchronized, whereas Smith.ai is the better alternative for practices with heavy intake and triage since its intake-to-assignment workflow keeps client messages orderly for attorney review.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Time Etc
Operational continuity across active matters that keeps calendaring and correspondence moving together.
Best for: Fits when firms need managed legal administration for calendars, correspondence, and ongoing matter upkeep.
Smith.ai
Editor pickStructured intake-to-assignment workflow that keeps client messages and follow-ups organized for attorney review.
Best for: Fits when intake volume and attorney message triage need consistent remote coverage.
MyOutDesk
Editor pickStaff-led intake-to-assignment workflow that turns attorney instructions into completed administrative deliverables.
Best for: Fits when firms need reliable legal secretary execution across active matters.
Comparison Table
Time Etc
agencyUK and US virtual assistant service matching experienced assistants to legal professionals.
Operational continuity across active matters that keeps calendaring and correspondence moving together.
Time Etc handles recurring administrative work tied to matter timelines, including appointment scheduling for attorneys, client-facing communication coordination, and structured updates that support consistent case progress. Engagement quality comes from operational continuity, since the same support group can maintain sequences across correspondence, status tracking, and document preparation needs. This provider also suits firms with established intake and document-flow routines because the handoffs depend on clear instructions and reliable access to case materials.
A key tradeoff is that the service is less suited to highly bespoke workflows that require frequent changes to every step of a matter process, since coverage is strongest for repeatable administrative patterns. Time Etc works well when a firm needs steadier throughput during attorney absences, when support capacity is stretched, or when a team wants centralized help for calendaring, correspondence, and routine document administration.
- +Attorney calendar management with consistent handling of meeting changes
- +Legal correspondence workflow support across active matters
- +Ongoing matter administration that reduces back-and-forth for routine tasks
- +Good fit for firms that provide clear templates and instructions
- –Best results depend on setup of clear work instructions and task definitions
- –Less ideal for one-off, rapidly changing workflows with unique steps each time
Small law firms
Cover administrative load during absences
Fewer missed deadlines and follow-ups
Litigation teams
Maintain steady matter timeline administration
More consistent case progress
Show 1 more scenario
Busy solo attorneys
Reduce daily administrative interruptions
More time for client work
Handles recurring correspondence and calendar requests to keep the workday predictable.
Best for: Fits when firms need managed legal administration for calendars, correspondence, and ongoing matter upkeep.
Smith.ai
specialistVirtual receptionist and assistant service designed for law firms.
Structured intake-to-assignment workflow that keeps client messages and follow-ups organized for attorney review.
Smith.ai fits firms that need day-to-day remote legal support with fewer handoffs and less internal coordination overhead. The service centers on structured intake, attorney-facing message handling, and matter administration tasks that recur across disputes, hearings, and client onboarding. Smith.ai is a strong choice when intake consistency and responsiveness matter more than building a fully customized back-office workflow.
A key tradeoff is that deep case-system integration is not the main differentiator, so teams that depend on tight connectivity to their case management software may need process adjustments. Smith.ai works well for high-volume intake and communication management where the firm can provide clear instructions, templates, and priority rules for handling inquiries. It is also a good fit when an attorney team wants predictable coverage windows for administrative intake and follow-up rather than relying on variable staff availability.
Where governance needs are high, Smith.ai’s value depends on how well the firm documents confidentiality handling, escalation rules, and preferred correspondence formats. Teams that treat the service like an extensions-of-staff model usually get faster ramp-up because requests can be standardized around matter types and response expectations.
- +Consistent intake handling with clear routing to attorney priorities
- +Structured client communication logs reduce follow-up gaps
- +Live support reduces reliance on internal scheduling coordination
- +Administrative document preparation support fits recurring litigation tasks
- –Limited differentiation for deep e-discovery style workflows
- –Requires well-defined instructions for edge-case escalation decisions
- –Tighter case-management software integration needs process alignment
- –Governance quality depends on the firm’s intake and template setup
Small litigation firms
Client intake and scheduling coordination
Fewer missed inquiries
Mid-market family law teams
Attorney correspondence and document prep
More time for hearings
Show 2 more scenarios
Boutique employment practices
Matter administration for disputes
Cleaner case workload
Manages routine communications and internal handoffs for active cases.
Trial-focused PI firms
Intake questionnaires and follow-ups
Faster qualification
Coordinates questionnaire intake and tracks next steps until attorney review.
Best for: Fits when intake volume and attorney message triage need consistent remote coverage.
MyOutDesk
agencyLarge-scale virtual assistant provider serving the legal industry among other sectors.
Staff-led intake-to-assignment workflow that turns attorney instructions into completed administrative deliverables.
MyOutDesk supports recurring legal administrative workflows such as attorney calendar management, legal correspondence preparation, and matter-oriented document handling that maps to everyday law-firm operations. The service is staffed, so work assignment and follow-through depend less on user formatting discipline than on the provider’s internal process. That structure tends to fit firms that already have standard templates and want reliable execution across active matters. It also aligns with teams that need controlled communication trails for client requests and attorney instructions.
A tradeoff appears in integration depth because deep native connectivity with case management and e-filing systems is not the primary differentiator. MyOutDesk is a stronger fit when administrative tasks are the priority and the firm can route inputs through a defined intake and document submission workflow. It is less ideal when a firm requires automation-first operations like fully programmatic docket monitoring or direct e-filing submission from a connected software stack.
- +Managed execution for drafting, correspondence, and routine legal admin tasks
- +Attorney calendar coordination reduces missed deadlines and rescheduling friction
- +Structured intake flow supports consistent request capture and handoff
- +Matter-focused document handling fits busy, multi-attorney practices
- –Integration depth is not the main strength versus software-native competitors
- –Governance depends on clear attorney instructions for edge-case tasks
- –Some specialized workflows may require additional internal coordination
- –Docket monitoring automation is limited compared with systems built for it
Small firm managing calendars
Weekly scheduling and attorney rescheduling
Fewer scheduling mistakes
Mid-market litigation team
Correspondence drafts and document prep
Faster client and court responses
Show 2 more scenarios
Practice with high intake volume
Client intake questionnaire handling
Cleaner intake packets
Intake processing structures client details into usable information for attorney review.
Multi-attorney office
Matter document organization support
Better matter consistency
Document handling helps keep deliverables tied to the correct matter workflow.
Best for: Fits when firms need reliable legal secretary execution across active matters.
PATLive
agencyVirtual receptionist company that supports law offices with call answering, transfers, lead capture, and scheduling.
Request intake-to-execution workflow that keeps attorney-facing updates traceable through standardized communication handling.
PATLive provides virtual legal secretary support focused on intake-to-task execution for law offices that need consistent administrative coverage. Teams typically route requests through a managed workflow that covers calendars, deadline monitoring, and client communication handling.
- +Consistent deadline monitoring workflows for busy attorney calendars
- +Structured intake handling that reduces back-and-forth with clients
- +Reliable client communication logs for routine status updates
- +Remote coordination that fits ongoing matter management routines
- –Complex filings often need attorney review before external deadlines
- –Automation and API access are limited for bespoke internal systems
- –Document handoff depends on office standards and naming discipline
Best for: Fits when law offices need dependable remote administrative follow-through across active matters.
Prialto
agencyManaged virtual assistant teams providing dedicated support to legal practices.
Matter-linked request handling that keeps intake answers, correspondence, and updates synchronized to the assigned attorney workflow.
Prialto serves as a virtual legal secretary that coordinates administrative and case-support work for law firms, including legal intake, client communications, and matter documentation tasks. The service is built around attorney-assistant workflows that translate instructions into draft correspondence, scheduling inputs, and structured follow-ups while maintaining a secure handling approach for confidential materials.
- +Strong handling of legal intake workflows and questionnaire follow-ups
- +Consistent legal correspondence drafting for recurring matter types
- +Good coordination of attorney calendar updates tied to requests
- +Structured capture of client communication history during active matters
- –Work quality depends on precise intake requirements and instructions
- –Filing and court-coordination tasks may need separate procedural alignment
- –Higher-touch matters can slow turnaround when instructions are incomplete
- –Limited transparency into assistant-level work stages without tighter request scoping
Best for: Fits when firms need consistent intake-to-communication execution with an assistant-led operations rhythm.
Boldly
agencyPremium subscription virtual assistant company serving legal professionals.
Matter intake-to-execution workflow that standardizes how requests become calendar, deadline tracking, and correspondence outputs.
Boldly serves law firms that need a staffed, workflow-driven virtual legal secretary layer for recurring administrative matter tasks. Core coverage centers on intake support, attorney calendar management, deadline and docket monitoring, and day-to-day legal correspondence handling.
- +Human-first workflow handling for intake, scheduling, and correspondence
- +Deadline and docket monitoring aligned to attorney instruction
- +Structured request intake reduces ambiguity across recurring tasks
- +Consistent document and communication turnarounds for administrative work
- –Calendar and deadline outcomes depend on how requests are specified
- –Limited visibility for complex edge cases without tight matter notes
- –Integration depth is narrower than dedicated legal operations systems
- –Document formatting may require firm standards to be specified clearly
Best for: Fits when a law firm needs staffed administrative throughput without building internal support capacity.
Alert Communications
agencyLegal intake call center and receptionist service focused on law firm client capture and response handling.
Assigned staff manage inbound communications and route next steps into matter workflows for ongoing docket support.
Alert Communications delivers remote legal administrative support focused on live communications handling and matter support workflows rather than only document production. The service is geared toward attorney calendar management, court deadline tracking, and ongoing docket monitoring tasks executed by assigned staff.
- +Staff execution is built around communication-first intake and follow-up
- +Consistent calendar and deadline tracking for active matters
- +Structured handling of legal correspondence and client update workflows
- +Operational continuity for recurring docket monitoring tasks
- –API and automation surface is not a core differentiator for buyers
- –Workflow quality depends on how firm instructions and priorities are documented
- –Deep e-filing automation and e-service coordination are not central strengths
- –System integration depth can be limited by the firm’s existing tooling
Best for: Fits when mid-sized practices need staff-led intake, deadline tracking, and correspondence follow-up.
Ruby Receptionists
agencyLive virtual receptionist service that supports law firms with call answering, intake, scheduling, and message handling.
Matter-aware intake routing that turns legal admin requests into clear staff tasks, reducing attorney involvement in each handoff.
Ruby Receptionists delivers remote legal secretary support centered on receptionist and administrative intake workflows, with legal matters handled through structured requests rather than generic call answering. Teams can route attorney calendar management tasks, client communication log updates, and legal correspondence drafting to trained support staff tied to specific matter needs.
- +Structured intake reduces back-and-forth for legal administrative requests
- +Trained staff handle routine client communication and scheduling tasks consistently
- +Workflow-driven handoffs fit attorneys who delegate without micro-managing
- +Coordinated document and correspondence support supports ongoing matters
- –Court filing preparation and e-filing coordination are not its core focus
- –Customization depth for specialized litigation workflows can be limited
- –Finer-grained docket monitoring needs may require additional processes
- –Coverage strength depends on clear instructions and defined request boundaries
Best for: Fits when firms need reliable remote admin intake, scheduling help, and client coordination without heavy litigation tooling.
Nexa
agencyReceptionist and intake outsourcing company with dedicated legal answering services.
Matter-based intake and correspondence tracking that keeps attorney-facing context linked to each active matter.
Nexa acts as a remote legal administrative assistant for law offices that need recurring intake, correspondence, and calendaring support across active matters. Nexa’s delivery centers on operational workflows like attorney calendar management and docket monitoring rather than broad general-purpose office automation.
- +Calendar and deadline coordination reduces missed court dates
- +Client communication logging keeps matter activity auditable
- +Repeatable intake handling supports high request volumes
- +Matter tracking workflow fits busy small and mid-sized practices
- –Heavier customization needs governance discipline on inputs and naming
- –Complex filings workflows can require tighter attorney review loops
Best for: Fits when a law firm needs ongoing remote administrative support for intake, deadlines, and client communications.
LEX Reception
specialistVirtual receptionist service built specifically for attorneys and law firms.
Practice-ready intake routing that converts call and message context into structured follow-up for attorney teams.
LEX Reception provides remote receptionist and legal-intake coverage that routes calls, captures matter details, and turns those notes into structured follow-up for law-firm teams. It is distinct for handling intake workflows and correspondence-facing tasks where consistent messaging matters more than software customization.
- +Intake-focused call handling with consistent message capture for attorneys
- +Clear escalation paths that reduce missed calls and low-information messages
- +Matter note summaries designed for quick internal handoff
- +Operator-led support reduces administrative drag for reception peaks
- –Extensibility beyond intake workflows depends on service configuration
- –Integration depth with case management tools is limited without extra coordination
- –Higher-volume routing needs tight instructions to avoid inconsistent triage
- –Limited evidence of deep automation for document-centric workflows
Best for: Fits when firms need managed reception and legal intake capture with controlled handoffs to attorneys.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 virtual legal secretary, Time Etc stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Virtual Legal Secretary
A virtual legal secretary is remote legal administrative assistant coverage that converts attorney instructions and client or phone intake into attorney-ready work products with consistent routing and review loops. This buyer's guide coverage spans Virtual Paralegal Services, Boldly, LEX Reception, Prialto, MyOutDesk, Time Etc, Smith.ai, Ruby Receptionists, Alert Communications, and PATLive.
The provider evaluations prioritize integration depth and automation surface, including how each service handles request workflows at the matter level and how operational control is maintained across delegated tasks. The tradeoffs across Martindale-Hubbell competitors like Martindale-Hubbell is not provided in the provider cards, while Zirtual and Smith.ai appear, are reflected in the section framing and in the specific execution models used by Virtual Paralegal Services, Prialto, and Smith.ai.
Virtual Legal Secretary: remote administrative execution for attorney workflows
A virtual legal secretary delivers delegated remote legal support by routing intake into standardized steps and producing drafts or confirmations that attorneys can review. Virtual Paralegal Services emphasizes matter-routed intake plus tracked attorney review loops for recurring administrative tasks.
Boldly focuses on workflow-based intake that turns attorney instructions into repeatable administrative outputs tied to each matter thread. Across these services, the core difference is how much of the task chain is operationalized into configured playbooks or workflows versus handled through human staff and manual instructions.
Virtual Legal Secretary capabilities that determine delegation quality
Delegated legal administration works only when intake, execution, and attorney review loops stay matter-routed and repeatable across routine tasks. Virtual Paralegal Services leads this category with matter-routed intake plus tracked attorney review loops for recurring admin work, which reduces dropped details between request submission and attorney signoff.
These services differ most in how operational steps are standardized into workflows or playbooks versus executed by staff with higher dependence on instructions. Boldly ties intake to repeatable administrative outputs per matter thread, while Prialto uses staff-run matter execution with configurable playbooks that control intake, follow-up cadence, and correspondence steps.
Matter-routed intake and thread-level continuity
Virtual Paralegal Services routes requests by matter and tracks attorney review loops to keep recurring admin tasks connected to the right file. Time Etc keeps correspondence and scheduling work aligned to specific active matters to reduce cross-matter drift.
Workflow versus staff-driven execution model
Boldly converts attorney instructions into workflow-based administrative outputs tied to each matter thread, which favors repeatability over bespoke legal judgment. Prialto runs staff-led matter execution with configurable playbooks, which works when firms want managed delivery without building their own internal automation.
Attorney review loop visibility and revision handling
Virtual Paralegal Services uses tracked attorney review loops for recurring admin work so revisions stay tied to the routed request. Smith.ai converts calls and messages into attorney-ready drafts with consistent formatting and routing, which helps reduce rework caused by first-pass ambiguity.
Intake structure from phone or messaging
LEX Reception turns phone conversations into standardized attorney-ready follow-ups with intake routing for consult requests and inquiries. Ruby Receptionists uses agent-led legal intake routing with attorney-specific instructions and handoff notes for same-day follow-through.
Correspondence and document preparation workflow coverage
Virtual Paralegal Services pairs document preparation workflows with request intake routing to reduce formatting and admin cycles. MyOutDesk provides operational request routing that turns incoming legal admin requests into standardized attorney-ready outputs with calendar and document coordination.
Governance and multi-attorney visibility controls
Smith.ai flags that governance controls for multi-attorney visibility require deliberate setup discipline, which matters for firms with shared ownership of drafts and messages. Ruby Receptionists requires clear scripting and governance for privileged communications to prevent handoff breakdowns in confidential intake.
How to choose a Virtual Legal Secretary by execution control and integration scope
The right provider depends on how much of the task chain can be made repeatable before work starts. Virtual Paralegal Services fits firms that want matter-routed intake plus tracked attorney review loops for recurring admin work, while Boldly fits firms that prefer workflow-based intake outputs tied to matter threads.
The second split is automation and integration depth versus staff-managed operations. Time Etc and PATLive describe automation and API integration depth as limited compared with integrator-first rivals, while Virtual Paralegal Services and other higher-score providers focus on operational routing and execution controls even when public API details are not emphasized.
Match matter routing to the firm’s real handoff points
Choose Virtual Paralegal Services when recurring tasks need matter-routed intake plus tracked attorney review loops so review and edits stay connected to the routed request. Choose Time Etc when the main risk is keeping scheduling and correspondence aligned to active files without building extensive internal staffing.
Select workflow-based delegation or staff-playbook delegation on purpose
Choose Boldly when the firm can convert attorney instructions into standardized administrative outputs through repeatable workflows tied to matter threads. Choose Prialto when the firm wants staff-led matter execution using configurable playbooks that manage intake, follow-up cadence, and correspondence steps.
Test edge-case handling with realistic instructions, not generic requests
Choose LEX Reception when structured legal intake routing from calls must produce attorney-ready follow-ups for triage and consult inquiries. Choose MyOutDesk when the firm can define operational request types clearly because complex docket tracking needs clear internal instructions and ongoing feedback.
Evaluate how drafts move from first-pass to approvals across attorneys
Choose Virtual Paralegal Services when attorney review loops must stay tracked to minimize revision churn on recurring admin tasks. Choose Smith.ai only when upfront requirements capture and deliberate governance setup can define how multi-attorney visibility is handled.
Set governance for privileged communications and scripting-heavy intake
Choose Ruby Receptionists when human call and email coverage must follow matter-aware routing and structured intake flows with matter-specific instructions. Choose Alert Communications only if the firm accepts that throughput depends on staffing because peak periods can constrain response even when attorney calendar management reduces manual scheduling.
Who benefits from a Virtual Legal Secretary service
Law firms benefit when intake-to-draft execution reduces attorney context switching while preserving attorney review as the final authority. Virtual Paralegal Services fits firms that run recurring administrative sequences for defined matters and need consistent routing plus tracked review loops.
Firms also benefit when intake channels are varied and must be normalized into structured outputs. LEX Reception is built around structured phone conversations that turn into attorney-ready follow-ups, while Ruby Receptionists emphasizes human intake with attorney-specific instructions and handoff notes.
Firms with repeated administrative tasks across many open matters
Virtual Paralegal Services keeps recurring admin work aligned to matter routed requests and tracked attorney review loops to reduce missed details. Time Etc maintains correspondence and scheduling tied to active files to prevent cross-matter confusion.
Teams that want delegated intake that outputs consistent draft-ready work
Boldly uses workflow-based intake that converts attorney instructions into repeatable administrative outputs per matter thread. Smith.ai similarly converts calls and messages into attorney-ready drafts with consistent formatting and routing.
Practices that rely on phone intake and consult triage
LEX Reception routes structured intake from phone conversations into attorney-ready follow-ups for faster consult triage. Ruby Receptionists provides human call and email coverage with matter-aware routing so client messages do not get lost before assignment.
Firms that need staff-run execution with configurable playbooks
Prialto coordinates staff matter execution with configurable playbooks for task intake, follow-up cadence, and correspondence steps. PATLive assigns a support team for request-to-work handling across ongoing matters, which reduces internal staffing needs.
Common mistakes that cause Virtual Legal Secretary failures
Most failures come from mismatched expectations about how standardized work must be defined before delegation starts. Services that route intake into workflows still require disciplined instructions for edge cases, and staff-led models require workflow mapping to match attorney preferences.
Another failure mode is treating the service as pure intake coverage when the workflow must carry drafts through attorney review and revisions. Providers like Virtual Paralegal Services emphasize tracked review loops, while others signal limited automation depth or dependency on staffing that can break under deadline pressure.
Assuming intake routing alone guarantees attorney-ready outputs
Virtual Paralegal Services pairs matter-routed intake with tracked attorney review loops, so routing without review tracking creates avoidable iteration cycles. For Smith.ai, shallow upfront requirements capture increases edge-case depth gaps that then slow turnaround.
Failing to map workflows to attorney preferences before asking for delegated execution
Prialto requires initial workflow mapping to match staff execution to attorney preferences, or coverage becomes uneven for niche procedures. PATLive and Alert Communications also depend on clear intake quality because request-to-work handling throughput varies with assigned staff capacity.
Overloading the service during peak deadline periods without staffing-aware planning
Alert Communications notes that throughput depends on staffing and can constrain performance during peak deadline periods. Time Etc and Ruby Receptionists can still handle delegated scheduling and drafting, but sustained peak loads require clear internal prioritization to preserve response quality.
Skipping governance design for multi-attorney visibility and privileged communications
Smith.ai flags governance controls for multi-attorney visibility as requiring deliberate setup discipline to avoid confusion on shared drafts. Ruby Receptionists calls out governance for privileged communications and requires clear scripting to prevent sensitive info mishandling.
How We Selected and Ranked These Providers
We evaluated Virtual Paralegal Services, Boldly, LEX Reception, Prialto, MyOutDesk, Time Etc, Smith.ai, Ruby Receptionists, Alert Communications, and PATLive on feature coverage first. Features accounted for 40% of the ranking, with workflow execution depth, matter-level routing continuity, and tracked review loops driving scoring differences.
Ease of use and value each accounted for 30%, and they reflected how cleanly each provider turns intake into attorney-ready outputs and how much instruction discipline is required. Virtual Paralegal Services ranked highest because matter-routed intake combined with tracked attorney review loops for recurring admin tasks reduces review churn and keeps outputs tied to the correct matter workflow.
Frequently Asked Questions About Virtual Legal Secretary
How do virtual legal secretary services handle intake when multiple practice groups submit requests at once?
Which services support calendar and deadline tracking without constant attorney touchpoints?
How does onboarding usually map firm workflows into a repeatable delivery process?
What integration and API expectations should law firms plan for with document handoffs and messaging?
Which providers use stronger access governance controls for staff who handle confidential client information?
How should firms migrate existing templates, intake forms, and matter identifiers into the service workflow?
What breaks if intake answers arrive without complete fields like matter number or client contact details?
Where do virtual legal secretary services differ in correspondence handling and response drafting versus routing?
How do these services handle conflicts between client communications and attorney priorities during the same day?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Funding and competing interests
This study was co-funded by several of the vendors assessed in it. No single vendor funded it. Funders could propose the market studied.
They had no role in selecting vendors, setting or weighting criteria, analysing data or drawing conclusions, and they received the same factual-accuracy check as every other vendor assessed.
Market definition, inclusion rules and criteria weights were fixed by an editor before research began and did not change afterwards. Editorial process →
- Legal Professional ServicesTop 10 Best Virtual Assistant Legal Services of 2026
- Business Process OutsourcingTop 10 Best Secretary Services of 2026
- Personal Care ServicesTop 10 Best Virtual Assistance Services of 2026
- Legal Professional ServicesTop 10 Best Company Secretary Software of 2026
- Legal Professional ServicesTop 10 Best Virtual Law Firm Software of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Legal Professional Services alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of legal professional services tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare legal professional services tools→