GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Telecommunications ConnectivityTop 10 Best Remote Peering Services of 2026
Compare remote peering providers, including epsilon, with notes on coverage, connectivity options, and use cases for network teams.
How we ranked these tools
Vendors set the topic, but our editors set the inclusion criteria and the evaluation framework before research starts.
Agents extract product evidence with provenance, then collect written reviews and transcribe video reviews and podcasts.
Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
epsilon is the strongest fit for network operators, managed service providers, and enterprises seeking on-demand global connectivity or peering because Infiny brings procurement and programmable control together across its carrier-grade network, whereas PacketFabric suits teams wanting API-managed exchange access without transport at every site since its backbone reaches connected exchanges without separate long-haul circuits.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
epsilon
Infiny brings procurement, provisioning, monitoring, and programmable network control together in one platform, backed by epsilon’s global carrier-grade network.
Best for: Network operators, managed service providers, and enterprises seeking on-demand connectivity procurement, global infrastructure management, cloud connectivity, or network peering.
PacketFabric
Editor pickPacketFabric portal and API provision exchange connections across the provider's backbone.
Best for: Fits when network teams need API-managed access to connected exchanges without deploying transport at every site.
Console Connect
Editor pickPortal and API provisioning over PCCW Global’s software-defined network.
Best for: Fits when network teams need software-managed exchange access across multiple international markets.
Comparison Table
epsilon
enterprise_vendorepsilon provides global connectivity services through Infiny, including on-demand provisioning, cloud connections, and network peering services.
Infiny brings procurement, provisioning, monitoring, and programmable network control together in one platform, backed by epsilon’s global carrier-grade network.
Infiny brings connectivity procurement, provisioning, and monitoring into one platform, with software-defined controls and API integration. epsilon delivers services over a global carrier-grade network and supports cloud connectivity and network peering. Its wider portfolio also covers communication and infrastructure services.
The breadth of epsilon’s infrastructure offering may be more involved than a simple connectivity need, and using the SDN controls and APIs effectively requires network engineering and automation expertise. A network operator managing global services can use Infiny to provision connectivity and monitor performance in one platform.
- +Combines connectivity procurement, provisioning, and monitoring in one platform.
- +Supports programmable network management through an SDN platform and APIs.
- –Individual users seeking a personal connectivity product should look to a consumer-focused provider.
- –Organizations seeking only a simple connectivity product may prefer a provider focused on that narrower job.
Network operators
Global connectivity management
Centralized service operations
Managed service providers
On-demand service provisioning
Programmable provisioning
Show 1 more scenario
Enterprise businesses
Cloud connections and peering
Connected cloud environments
epsilon supports enterprise cloud connectivity and peering within a broader global connectivity service.
Best for: Network operators, managed service providers, and enterprises seeking on-demand connectivity procurement, global infrastructure management, cloud connectivity, or network peering.
PacketFabric
specialistNetwork-as-a-service platform providing on-demand peering and connectivity services.
PacketFabric portal and API provision exchange connections across the provider's backbone.
PacketFabric carries exchange connectivity over its backbone and lets customers manage service connections through a central portal or API. That control surface suits network teams that automate provisioning across multiple facilities. Operators can add reach without arranging a separate transport path to every connected exchange.
Coverage is limited to facilities and exchange partners connected to PacketFabric, so the service cannot reach every market. A regional ISP can use it to extend exchange access where PacketFabric has coverage, but still needs to manage its own BGP sessions and routing policy.
- +Portal and API support on-demand connection provisioning and centralized service management.
- +Backbone transport reaches connected exchange locations without a separate long-haul circuit per destination.
- +Customers retain control over session and routing configuration.
- –Exchange coverage is limited to PacketFabric-connected facilities and partner locations.
- –Customers must configure and maintain their own BGP sessions and route policies.
Regional internet service providers
Extend regional exchange reach
Broader exchange reach
Content delivery networks
Add regional peering access
More regional paths
Show 1 more scenario
Network automation teams
Provision exchange connections by API
Repeatable provisioning
The API supports connection management from existing orchestration workflows instead of relying solely on portal tasks.
Best for: Fits when network teams need API-managed access to connected exchanges without deploying transport at every site.
Console Connect
enterprise_vendorPCCW Global connectivity platform offering remote peering and interconnection services.
Portal and API provisioning over PCCW Global’s software-defined network.
Console Connect combines exchange access with private connectivity to cloud and data-center endpoints in one service environment. Portal and API controls support teams that need to provision or adjust network connections across multiple locations.
Exchange and facility reach depends on Console Connect’s service footprint, and customer teams remain responsible for routing policy. The service suits operators extending peering into markets where building a local presence at each exchange would add operational overhead.
- +Portal and API support reduce dependence on manual circuit orders.
- +Exchange access shares an operating environment with cloud connectivity.
- +Software controls allow bandwidth adjustments across connected locations.
- –Exchange and facility reach depends on Console Connect’s footprint.
- –Customers retain responsibility for BGP sessions and routing policy.
International network operators
Extend exchange access abroad
Broader regional reach
Cloud infrastructure teams
Connect sites to cloud regions
Fewer separate interconnects
Show 1 more scenario
Content delivery networks
Expand interconnection capacity
Faster capacity changes
API-driven provisioning lets network teams add capacity as traffic grows across connected locations.
Best for: Fits when network teams need software-managed exchange access across multiple international markets.
Megaport
enterprise_vendorNetwork-as-a-service provider enabling remote peering through software-defined connectivity.
Megaport Portal and API provision virtual cross connects across the fabric, joining exchange, data-center, and cloud endpoints.
Megaport connects participating exchanges and data centers through a software-defined fabric with on-demand virtual connections. Teams provision links through the Megaport Portal or API, and Megaport Cloud Router can join exchange access with cloud and other network endpoints without a customer-owned router at every site.
- +Portal and API support on-demand provisioning of virtual cross connects.
- +Megaport Cloud Router can combine exchange access with cloud and private network connections.
- +Fabric changes can avoid ordering a separate physical circuit for each handoff.
- –Exchange access depends on participating facilities and local Megaport reach.
- –Cloud Router adds a routing layer to configure and monitor alongside existing edge devices.
Multi-site network teams
Add exchange reach at regional sites
Faster regional peering deployment
Cloud networking teams
Connect exchanges to cloud environments
Fewer physical router dependencies
Show 1 more scenario
Network service providers
Offer customer access to exchanges
Expanded service reach
Providers can package Megaport fabric connectivity for customers needing access across supported data-center locations.
Best for: Fits when network teams need API-driven exchange access alongside cloud and data-center connectivity across Megaport-connected facilities.
Equinix Fabric
enterprise_vendorOn-demand interconnection platform providing direct private connections to clouds, partners, and digital supply chain participants within Equinix data centers.
Virtual connections extend an existing Fabric port into Equinix Internet Exchange markets without routers in each market.
Equinix Fabric carries virtual connections from Equinix facilities to Equinix Internet Exchange markets, integrating remote peering with Equinix’s broader interconnection fabric. Network teams can provision connections through the portal or API and establish BGP sessions from their own routers. The model fits organizations already using Equinix, while reach depends on Fabric and exchange availability at each target location.
- +Portal and API support provisioning of virtual connections.
- +Existing Equinix ports can reach multiple interconnection destinations.
- +Exchange access can reduce the need for routers in every market.
- –Coverage depends on Fabric and exchange availability at each target location.
- –Teams without an Equinix presence need a separate path to Fabric.
ISP peering teams
Extend exchange reach
Fewer remote router deployments
Multinational carriers
Add access in new metros
Wider metro coverage
Show 1 more scenario
Enterprise network teams
Centralize exchange connectivity
Consolidated exchange access
Teams can connect distributed networks to available exchange markets through their existing Equinix Fabric access.
Best for: Fits when network teams want remote peering through existing Equinix Fabric access.
Arelion
enterprise_vendorGlobal network provider formerly known as Telia Carrier offering remote peering services.
AS1299-backed reach to supported exchange locations across Arelion's international network.
Arelion suits network teams extending peering beyond their own metros, with reach built on its AS1299 global backbone. Its remote peering service carries traffic to supported exchange locations over Arelion's international network, reducing the need to arrange transport separately in each market. The service is most useful for operators expanding across regions, while its reach depends on Arelion's network footprint and available exchange locations.
- +AS1299 backbone provides international reach across multiple markets.
- +Remote access can reduce the need for separate transport arrangements in each location.
- +A single carrier relationship can support exchange access across regions.
- –Available exchange locations depend on Arelion's network reach.
- –The carrier-backed scope may exceed the needs of operators targeting one nearby exchange.
Regional internet service providers
Expanding into neighboring markets
Broader regional reach
International network operators
Adding cross-border exchange access
More exchange locations
Show 1 more scenario
Content delivery networks
Extending regional peering presence
Wider regional presence
Arelion can carry traffic to supported exchanges in markets where the network lacks its own transport presence.
Best for: Fits when network operators need exchange access across multiple regions through Arelion's international backbone.
NL-ix
specialistNetherlands-based internet exchange offering remote peering across European markets.
Distributed multi-metro fabric consolidates access to NL-ix exchange locations.
NL-ix's distributed European exchange fabric links networks to multiple metropolitan locations through a shared platform. Route-server access supports multilateral sessions, and cloud-connect services carry traffic to connected cloud networks. Its reach is useful for regional expansion, but it does not replace IP transit or end-to-end WAN transport.
- +Distributed European locations extend reach beyond a single metro market.
- +Route-server access supports multilateral sessions across connected networks.
- +Cloud-connect services add cloud-network reach through the exchange platform.
- –Availability depends on access at each target location.
- –Exchange access does not include IP transit or end-to-end WAN transport.
Regional network operators
Adding European peer reach
Broader regional reach
Cloud service providers
Connecting customers to cloud networks
Additional cloud paths
Show 1 more scenario
Hosting and content networks
Expanding across metro markets
Fewer local deployments
A shared platform lets these networks reach multiple NL-ix locations from their existing access point.
Best for: Fits when network teams want broader European peering reach without deploying at every exchange location.
France-IX
specialistFrench internet exchange with remote peering across Paris and regional nodes.
Paris and Marseille fabrics provide remote access to France-IX’s two principal French exchange locations.
Among remote peering services, France-IX provides access to French exchange fabrics centered on Paris and Marseille. Members can use route servers for public peering or establish bilateral sessions, with IPv4 and IPv6 support. The service suits networks targeting French traffic exchange, but its geographic footprint is narrower than providers with broader international coverage.
- +Paris and Marseille locations connect networks to major French interconnection hubs.
- +IPv4 and IPv6 support covers common network requirements.
- +Route servers simplify public peering with participating members.
- –Exchange coverage is concentrated in France rather than a broad global footprint.
- –Remote access depends on transport reach from a network or service partner.
International internet providers
Entering French traffic markets
French network reach
Content delivery networks
Improving French delivery paths
More direct delivery
Show 1 more scenario
Regional access providers
Adding exchange connectivity
Expanded interconnection
Providers can reach France-IX through available transport partners instead of building a local exchange presence.
Best for: Fits when networks need French exchange access without building a local presence.
AMS-IX
specialistAmsterdam-based internet exchange offering remote peering to networks worldwide.
Partner-delivered entry into AMS-IX's established Amsterdam interconnection community
AMS-IX provides partner-delivered remote peering into its Amsterdam exchange, giving off-site networks access to a major Dutch interconnection hub. Members can use the shared platform for route-server sessions or arrange bilateral peering.
- +Provides access to AMS-IX's established Amsterdam exchange community
- +Avoids requiring an on-site Amsterdam connection
- +Supports route-server and bilateral interconnection options
- –Remote transport depends on a separate connectivity partner
- –Provisioning and troubleshooting can involve two organizations
- –Access is centered on AMS-IX exchange locations, not a single carrier's broad transport footprint
International internet service providers
Enter the Dutch peering market
Amsterdam exchange presence
Content delivery networks
Exchange traffic with AMS-IX members
Broader local reach
Best for: Fits when networks need remote peering access to AMS-IX's Amsterdam exchange.
LINX
specialistLondon internet exchange providing remote peering services to member networks.
Partner-delivered access to LINX's London and regional exchange communities without a local port at each site.
LINX gives networks without equipment at its exchange sites partner-delivered access to its UK interconnection communities. Participants can connect to LINX exchange environments and use route servers for sessions with participating networks. Reach depends on the access partner's footprint, while partner transport adds another party to path control and fault handling.
- +Partner connections extend access to LINX's London and regional exchange communities.
- +Route-server access can reduce the work of establishing sessions with participating networks.
- +Remote access avoids deploying equipment at every exchange site.
- –Reach and delivery options depend on each partner's footprint.
- –Carrier mediation adds another party to fault isolation and service restoration.
- –The partner's transport path limits direct control over latency and path changes.
International network operators
UK exchange access without local equipment
Broader UK peering reach
Regional internet service providers
Adding London interconnection
Additional network paths
Show 1 more scenario
Content delivery networks
Connecting with regional peers
More direct traffic exchange
LINX access supports sessions with participating networks across its UK exchange locations.
Best for: Fits when networks need access to LINX communities beyond their directly connected facilities.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 remote peering, epsilon stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Remote Peering
We would separate options by Exchange and metro coverage, Routing policy controls, and Provisioning workflow: these determine where a network can connect, how routes are constrained, and how reliably teams can apply changes. Path performance and diversity and Capacity and bandwidth determine whether the connection fits traffic needs.
Exchange and metro coverage
Why it matters
Exchange and metro coverage determines whether the service reaches the exchange locations your networks need. Broad regional claims matter less than confirmed availability at specific sites.
How to check
Ask for a current list of supported exchange locations and confirm the exact sites you plan to use. Check whether access is available directly or through an intermediary.
Provisioning workflow
Why it matters
Provisioning workflow affects how quickly teams can establish connections and make routine changes. An API and clear configuration steps can reduce manual work across many locations.
How to check
Ask for a walkthrough of ordering a connection, changing its configuration, and removing it. Review the API documentation for those same actions and check whether status and errors are visible.
Routing policy controls
Why it matters
Routing policy controls help teams limit which routes they send and accept. Clear controls for a BGP session and prefix filtering can reduce accidental route changes.
How to check
In a demo, inspect how a team sets route limits and applies import or export rules. Ask how the service reports rejected routes and whether the settings can be changed through its API.
Path performance and diversity
Why it matters
Path performance and diversity affect delay and the impact of a connection failure. The available paths should suit the locations and traffic patterns that matter to your network.
How to check
Ask for sample latency measurements between your intended locations and the exchange sites. Confirm whether the service can show distinct paths and what happens to traffic when one path is unavailable.
Capacity and bandwidth
Why it matters
Capacity and bandwidth determine how much traffic the connection can carry before it becomes constrained. The available limits should match both normal demand and expected peaks.
How to check
Ask for the connection capacity options and any limits on sustained or burst traffic. Review how usage is measured and whether teams can see utilization over time.
Red flags
- Exchange and metro coverage is described by broad regions without naming available sites.
- Provisioning workflow requires manual steps for routine changes, with no visible status or error details.
- Path performance and diversity is presented without location-specific measurements or an explanation of failover.
Fit by situation
- If you need access at a small set of specific exchange sites, prioritize Exchange and metro coverage.
- If your team expects to configure many connections programmatically, prioritize Provisioning workflow.
- If traffic depends on predictable delay or alternate routes, prioritize Path performance and diversity.
Frequently Asked Questions About Remote Peering
How does remote peering carry traffic to an internet exchange?
When does a carrier-backed service make more sense than access to one exchange?
What tradeoff comes with partner-delivered remote peering?
How do API-driven services differ in connection provisioning?
What network details should a team prepare before onboarding?
How should operators assess routing security for remote peering?
What changes when migrating existing exchange sessions to remote peering?
Where can a distributed European exchange fabric fall short?
How should teams troubleshoot a remote peering outage?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Funding and competing interests
This study was co-funded by several of the vendors assessed in it. No single vendor funded it. Funders could propose the market studied.
They had no role in selecting vendors, setting or weighting criteria, analysing data or drawing conclusions, and they received the same factual-accuracy check as every other vendor assessed.
Market definition, inclusion rules and criteria weights were fixed by an editor before research began and did not change afterwards. Editorial process →
- TelecommunicationsTop 10 Best Remote Network Services of 2026
- Telecommunications ConnectivityTop 10 Best Peer Sync Software of 2026
- Telecommunications ConnectivityTop 10 Best Lan Remote Control Software of 2026
- Telecommunications ConnectivityTop 10 Best Outsource Network Services of 2026
- Facilities Property ServicesTop 10 Best Remote Computer Support Services of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Telecommunications Connectivity alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of telecommunications connectivity tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare telecommunications connectivity tools→