GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Environment EnergyTop 10 Best Pv Monitoring Services of 2026
Ranked roundup of pv monitoring services with technical criteria and tradeoffs, covering Enertis Applus+, meteocontrol, and Also Energy for vendor shortlists.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Enertis Applus+ is the best fit for engineering teams that want consistent fleet performance reviews and deeper fault triage support, whereas Also Energy works better if your operations team needs standardized PV monitoring across many plants.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Enertis Applus+
Engineering review workflow that converts monitored alarms and performance deviations into structured, repeatable investigations.
Built for fits when engineering teams need consistent fleet performance reviews and deeper fault triage support..
meteocontrol
Editor pickWeather-integrated monitoring that ties site irradiance context to performance and fault analysis workflows.
Built for fits when asset owners need consistent fleet monitoring with weather-aware performance interpretation and automated alarm workflows..
Also Energy
Editor pickOperational alerting and performance reporting designed for day-to-day maintenance triage across sites.
Built for fits when asset operations teams standardize monitoring across many PV plants..
Comparison Table
Enertis Applus+
specialistDelivers technical asset management, PV performance analysis, monitoring oversight, and operational reporting.
Engineering review workflow that converts monitored alarms and performance deviations into structured, repeatable investigations.
Enertis Applus+ is positioned for teams that need more than dashboards because it pairs monitoring outputs with structured engineering interpretation for recurring issues. Plant-level monitoring is supported with aggregation across assets so fleets can be reviewed by geography, asset type, or owner-defined grouping. Operational context is handled through ingestion of plant telemetry and the ability to attach analysis results to monitored entities for ongoing investigation.
A tradeoff appears when strict internal engineering governance is expected from day one since deeper configuration and data mapping work can require sustained owner input. Enertis Applus+ fits best when fleets already have SCADA and telemetry pipelines and the goal is consistent performance review cycles across multiple plants.
- +Engineering-led performance review workflow behind monitoring insights
- +Fleet aggregation supports consistent review across multiple plants
- +Telemetry ingestion supports routine event investigation and tracking
- +Operational context mapping helps link faults to monitored entities
- –Data mapping and configuration demand sustained input from site owners
- –Advanced automation depends on agreed integration patterns and governance
- –Some analyses take longer to operationalize than dashboard-first vendors
- –Admin setup can be heavier for small fleets with limited telemetry
Asset management teams
Fleet performance review with engineering triage
Faster fault resolution cycles
SCADA integration engineers
Align telemetry feeds with monitoring
Lower integration rework
Show 2 more scenarios
O&M operations leads
Alarm handling for field maintenance
Reduced time to acknowledge
Operational events are tied to asset entities for structured investigation workflows.
Owner analytics teams
Track performance issues over time
More consistent performance tracking
Performance analytics support ongoing comparisons across assets under shared review rules.
Best for: Fits when engineering teams need consistent fleet performance reviews and deeper fault triage support.
meteocontrol
specialistProvides managed PV plant monitoring, remote operations, alarm handling, and performance reporting.
Weather-integrated monitoring that ties site irradiance context to performance and fault analysis workflows.
Meteocontrol is a strong option for teams managing portfolios that include multiple plants, because the monitoring process stays consistent from telemetry ingestion through fault and performance review. It uses weather and irradiance context to interpret behavior and to support reporting based on operational metrics rather than raw device status. Operational engagement is typically practical when sites already have inverter telemetry and field instrumentation or can be connected through standard plant data paths.
A key tradeoff is that deeper automation and richer analytics depend on having sufficient measurement inputs at the plant, such as irradiance and weather reference instrumentation. It fits usage situations where operations teams must investigate alarms quickly and also track performance trends across sites for maintenance planning.
- +Portfolio monitoring workflows reduce site-by-site reporting variability
- +Weather-context inputs improve interpretation beyond inverter status
- +Automated alarm handling supports faster operational triage
- +Data ingestion fits both field devices and monitoring outputs
- –Richer analytics depend on having adequate weather instrumentation
- –Deeper configuration work is needed for consistent cross-site rules
- –Alarm tuning can require sustained operational ownership
- –Export and integration depth may lag teams needing custom pipelines
PV operations teams
Alarm triage across multiple plants
Faster corrective action cycles
Asset managers
Fleet performance trend reporting
More predictable availability
Show 2 more scenarios
EPC and O amp M coordinators
Standardized handover monitoring
Lower repeat troubleshooting
Coordinators set up site monitoring so post-handover issues surface in the same operational workflow.
SCADA integration engineers
Plant telemetry connectivity
Centralized operational visibility
Engineers connect plant telemetry into the monitoring service for unified event and performance views.
Best for: Fits when asset owners need consistent fleet monitoring with weather-aware performance interpretation and automated alarm workflows.
Also Energy
enterprise_vendorPV monitoring and asset management provider serving utility and commercial solar fleets.
Operational alerting and performance reporting designed for day-to-day maintenance triage across sites.
Also Energy is positioned for teams that need fleet monitoring across multiple PV plants while still drilling into site performance and issue details. Monitoring outputs are built around operational KPIs and alerting so recurring problems can be tracked across time, not just viewed as single snapshots. The integration surface is designed for PV telemetry ingestion and downstream use in reporting and operational review.
A key tradeoff is that deep string-level use cases depend on the telemetry available from the plant side, so projects with limited granularity may receive fewer diagnostics. It fits situations where an operations team wants consistent monitoring across several sites and uses alerts plus periodic performance review to drive maintenance and troubleshooting.
- +Fleet-style monitoring supports multi-plant operational review
- +Alerting ties performance changes to investigation workflows
- +PV telemetry ingestion reduces manual data handling
- +Consistent reporting supports recurring asset performance checks
- –String-level diagnostics require plant telemetry granularity
- –Advanced integrations can add implementation and governance workload
Renewable asset managers
Monthly review of multiple PV plants
Faster performance reviews
PV operations teams
Investigate recurring fault patterns
Reduced mean time to troubleshoot
Show 2 more scenarios
SCADA integration engineers
Ingest inverter telemetry into monitoring
Less custom ETL work
Supports telemetry ingestion flows so monitoring reflects live operational data.
Site technical managers
Validate performance after repairs
Clearer maintenance verification
Correlates post-maintenance periods with performance behavior to confirm improvements.
Best for: Fits when asset operations teams standardize monitoring across many PV plants.
juwi
enterprise_vendorDelivers PV operations and maintenance with remote monitoring, inspections, fault management, and reporting.
Service-led alarm review and fault triage workflow that maps monitoring findings to operational actions.
juwi couples photovoltaic monitoring with plant operations experience from its own project delivery, so monitoring workflows align closely with how sites are actually run. The service covers fleet-to-plant visibility and supports inverter and balance-of-system signals when owners provide integration endpoints.
Alarm and performance review are handled with an operational lens, including fault-focused triage and sustained reporting for ongoing availability tracking. For teams that need monitoring governed across multiple sites, juwi’s delivery approach emphasizes repeatable processes and consistent operational review.
- +Operational review workflows reflect field delivery experience
- +Supports consistent monitoring across fleets and multi-site portfolios
- +Fault-focused triage supports faster diagnosis than pure dashboards
- +Integration effort is grounded in real site signal availability
- –API depth for automated provisioning is not positioned as a primary capability
- –Coverage depends on what telemetry endpoints and devices are available per site
- –Advanced analysis requires tight alignment with site configuration and reporting rules
- –Governance and role controls are more service-led than self-serve
Best for: Fits when portfolio owners want managed monitoring processes tied to plant operations and fault handling.
BayWa r.e.
enterprise_vendorDelivers solar operations and maintenance with remote monitoring, fault response, and plant performance analysis.
Operational issue handling tied to BayWa r.e. project site management workflows rather than generic dashboards.
BayWa r.e. provides photovoltaic asset monitoring for operators managing BayWa r.e. installations, with emphasis on day-to-day plant health and performance review.
The service centers on inverter and plant-level visibility workflows that support troubleshooting from symptoms to actionable operational next steps.
Monitoring integration is geared toward the telemetry patterns found on PV sites, including SCADA-connected data and data logger feeds.
The engagement model typically favors configured operations and controlled data access over self-service extensibility for every edge case.
- +Plant health monitoring aligned to BayWa r.e. operational workflows
- +Clear issue surfacing for faster fault and performance triage
- +Works with common PV telemetry ingestion patterns used on sites
- +Fleet monitoring view supports cross-plant comparison and trend review
- –Automation depth for custom alarm logic can be limited by service setup
- –Deep string-level or module-level analytics depend on site telemetry availability
Best for: Fits when plant operators want managed PV monitoring with BayWa r.e. project context and operational workflows.
RES
enterprise_vendorOffers renewable asset management and solar O&M supported by control-room monitoring and performance oversight.
Managed monitoring implementation that maps site telemetry into operational alarm and maintenance processes.
RES supports photovoltaic asset monitoring for plant, inverter, and fleet use cases through a managed service model that pairs monitoring with domain delivery. The core system focus is on turning site telemetry into actionable fault and performance insights that operators can operate across multiple assets.
RES governance is strongest when projects need standardized rollouts across portfolios, because implementation work and operational controls are part of the service delivery. Integration depth centers on wiring field data sources into the monitoring workflow and keeping alarm and maintenance processes aligned to operational practice.
- +Managed delivery aligns monitoring outputs with plant operations
- +Portfolio rollout work reduces variation across sites and teams
- +Operational workflows support fault triage instead of raw data only
- +Integration planning focuses on making telemetry usable for monitoring
- –Service-led onboarding can slow teams needing rapid self-serve setup
- –Deep customization depends on delivery scope rather than direct UI control
- –API-first extensibility is less central than implementation and operations work
- –String-level depth is not the default emphasis compared with higher-level telemetry
Best for: Fits when operators want monitored fleets handled through standardized delivery and integrated fault workflows.
Solar-Log
enterprise_vendorPhotovoltaic monitoring and energy management system manufacturer based in Germany.
Fleet-oriented monitoring that ties inverter and data-logger sources into unified operational status and alarm workflows.
Solar-Log focuses on photovoltaic asset monitoring with plant-level visibility built around inverter and data-logger integration. It provides a structured dashboard for operational status, energy yield trends, and fault or alarm signals across sites.
The service is designed for multi-asset fleets where consistent configuration and centralized access matter more than one-off analysis. Administration and integration depth typically make it a fit for teams that need ongoing plant monitoring rather than ad hoc reporting.
- +Centralized plant monitoring for fleets with consistent operational views
- +Integration support for inverter and logger ecosystems used in PV deployments
- +Operational dashboards emphasize alarms and energy trend context
- +Multi-site configuration supports standardized monitoring across assets
- –Deeper automation and integrations can require deliberate setup work
- –Advanced performance analytics depend on available sensor and metering inputs
- –Large fleets may need disciplined device mapping to avoid messy hierarchies
- –API extensibility is not always the primary path for day-to-day operations
Best for: Fits when operators need fleet monitoring with inverter and logger integrations plus consistent plant dashboards.
Voltalia
enterprise_vendorProvides solar plant operations, maintenance, remote monitoring, and technical performance services.
Monitoring tied to Voltalia’s asset-operations delivery process for consistent issue triage across managed solar projects.
Voltalia pairs photovoltaic asset operations with a monitoring and performance workflow built around fleet oversight across managed projects. The service focus centers on ingesting site measurements and operational signals, then translating them into alarms, performance indicators, and diagnostics workflows suitable for plant-level and multi-site management.
Voltalia’s distinct angle comes from pairing monitoring with operational delivery experience across solar assets rather than treating monitoring as a standalone analytics-only feed. Teams evaluating pv monitoring should pay close attention to integration depth for existing data loggers and inverter telemetry, plus how automation is implemented for issue detection and alert routing.
- +Operational experience across managed solar assets informs monitoring workflows
- +Fleet-style oversight supports multi-site performance tracking
- +Diagnostics and alarm handling fit ongoing asset management processes
- +Integration work aligns monitoring with operational data sources
- –Integration depth depends on project-specific telemetry and historian paths
- –Automation and governance controls require disciplined configuration to stay consistent
- –Explanatory depth for metric methodology may be limited for custom KPIs
- –String-level detail depends on what telemetry is available per site
Best for: Fits when monitoring is part of an operations engagement that needs plant-level visibility and managed diagnostics.
Alectris
specialistProvides solar asset management, remote monitoring, preventive maintenance, and corrective field services.
Fault detection and alarm management are packaged as operational workflows rather than only dashboards.
Alectris provides photovoltaic asset monitoring that connects plant data into a centralized view for performance tracking across sites. The service focuses on operational analytics such as fault detection, alarm management workflows, and comparative performance insights against expected behavior.
Integration work centers on bringing inverter, meter, and sensor feeds into a consistent monitoring workflow. Administration is oriented toward managing fleets of assets and keeping monitoring operations aligned with site changes.
- +Operational monitoring workflows for alarms and fault triage
- +Centralized fleet view supports plant-level performance comparisons
- +Integration-oriented approach for bringing site data into one workflow
- +Monitoring outputs are designed around recurring performance review cycles
- –Deeper customization requires more integration and configuration work
- –Best results depend on consistent site instrumentation and data quality
Best for: Fits when operators need managed PV monitoring workflows across multiple plants with ongoing performance reviews.
Solarig
enterprise_vendorProvides photovoltaic O&M, remote supervision, preventive maintenance, and performance management.
PV-specific alert and performance analysis workflow designed for day-to-day asset operations across multiple plants.
Solarig targets teams managing photovoltaic asset monitoring where plant-level dashboards must connect to multiple data sources and stay operational over time. The service focuses on operational monitoring workflows such as alerts, performance visibility, and analysis outputs built around PV telemetry.
Solarig’s differentiator is how its monitoring outputs are shaped for ongoing operations rather than only historical reporting. The platform’s value concentrates on integration depth and governance-friendly administration for fleet or portfolio owners.
- +Operational monitoring emphasis with alerting and performance-focused outputs
- +Integration work oriented toward real PV telemetry sources and plant rollups
- +Works well for fleet monitoring where asset groupings matter
- +Administration supports day-to-day oversight for multi-asset operators
- –Advanced use cases require careful setup of device mappings and signal definitions
- –Automation breadth depends on the integration approach used for each telemetry source
Best for: Fits when operators need plant-level monitoring with integration workback for ongoing performance operations.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 environment energy, Enertis Applus+ stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right pv monitoring
PV monitoring is the operational layer for photovoltaic asset monitoring that turns inverter, data-logger, and weather inputs into alarms, performance reviews, and fault triage workflows across fleets and single plants. This guide covers Enertis Applus+ , meteocontrol , Also Energy , juwi , BayWa r.e. , RES , Solar-Log , Voltalia , Alectris , and Solarig.
The provider set splits along how deeply monitoring outcomes get converted into repeatable investigations, how much weather context is used to interpret performance deviations, and how automation is delivered across multi-plant rollouts. Enertis Applus+ is profiled for an engineering review workflow that structures monitored alarms and performance deviations into consistent investigations, while meteocontrol is profiled for weather-integrated monitoring workflows that tie irradiance context to fault analysis and alarm interpretation.
PV monitoring: turning inverter, logger, and weather signals into plant-level operations
PV monitoring connects photovoltaic asset telemetry and contextual inputs into plant-level monitoring outputs that support alarm management, performance deviation review, and fault triage. It typically aggregates measurements across assets and standardizes how operational teams interpret what changed, why it likely changed, and what action should follow.
Enertis Applus+ is characterized by an engineering-led review workflow that converts monitored alarms and performance deviations into structured, repeatable investigations across multiple plants. meteocontrol is characterized by weather-integrated monitoring that uses irradiance context to improve interpretation beyond inverter status, which affects both performance assessment and the outcomes of automated alarm workflows.
PV monitoring capabilities that change operations outcomes
PV monitoring only becomes actionable when alerts and performance deviations turn into an investigation path that engineers and operators can repeat across sites. Across this vendor set, Enertis Applus+ and juwi lead with workflows that structure alarm review into fault triage steps, while Alectris packages fault detection and alarm management as ongoing operational workflows.
Investigation-ready alarm and deviation workflows
Enertis Applus+ converts monitored alarms and performance deviations into structured, repeatable investigations across fleets and single plants. juwi and Alectris focus on operational review and fault triage workflows that map monitoring findings to actions for plant teams.
Weather-aware interpretation for performance deviations
meteocontrol integrates weather context so performance deviations are interpreted with irradiance context, not only inverter status. Solar-Log and Solarig focus more on operational rollups from inverter and data-logger sources, so weather inputs must be present to raise analytics quality.
Fleet rollout consistency and cross-plant reporting variance control
Also Energy and RES emphasize multi-plant operational review that reduces site-by-site variability in how issues are surfaced. Enertis Applus+ and BayWa r.e. also support consistent cross-site operational workflows when integration patterns and governance are agreed.
Integration scope across inverter and data-logger sources
Solar-Log centralizes plant monitoring by tying inverter and data-logger sources into unified fleet operational status and alarm workflows. Solarig and Voltalia orient integration work toward PV telemetry sources and plant rollups, which affects how quickly automated monitoring can be made consistent.
Automation surface and configuration governance for custom logic
Enertis Applus+ and juwi support deeper operational automation, but advanced automation requires agreed integration patterns and sustained configuration discipline. BayWa r.e. and Alectris can limit custom alarm logic depth when service setup governs the monitoring rules.
Choose a PV monitoring workflow model that matches how faults get handled
Vendor fit depends on how monitoring outputs move from alarms into field decisions. Enertis Applus+ and juwi prioritize engineering-led investigation structure, while RES and Voltalia fit teams that want managed monitoring delivery mapped to operational processes.
Pick the workflow owner for alarm investigation
If investigations need engineering-led structure that turns monitored alarms and deviations into repeatable investigations, Enertis Applus+ is built around that investigation workflow. If plant operations needs service-led fault triage mapped to operational actions, juwi and Alectris package monitoring findings into ongoing operational workflows.
Decide how weather context will be used in alarm interpretation
If irradiance context must drive whether performance deviations represent faults or expected conditions, meteocontrol ties weather-integrated monitoring to interpretation and automated alarm workflows. If weather instrumentation is limited, Solar-Log, alsoenergy, and Solarig remain more dependent on inverter and data-logger telemetry quality for advanced performance analytics.
Match fleet consistency goals to the delivery model
If cross-plant reporting consistency must be enforced through portfolio monitoring workflows, meteocontrol and alsoenergy aim to reduce site-by-site reporting variability through fleet-style monitoring workflows. If consistent rollout depends on managed delivery mapping monitoring into maintenance processes, RES and Voltalia align to standardized delivery and operational fault workflows.
Assess whether string-level diagnostics are realistic for the installed telemetry
If string-level diagnostics are required, Also Energy flags that string-level diagnostic depth depends on plant telemetry granularity and string telemetry availability. If available telemetry is limited or varies by site, Solar-Log and BayWa r.e. may still deliver useful operational status but advanced string-level or module-level analytics depend on what endpoints and devices exist per site.
Quantify the configuration work for custom alarm logic and automation depth
Teams planning automated alarm logic that stays consistent across plants should expect Enertis Applus+ and meteocontrol to require sustained input for data mapping and configuration. Teams that want managed operational handling should treat BayWa r.e. and RES as delivery-scoped, where customization depth can be constrained by service setup rather than direct UI control.
Teams that get the most from these PV monitoring services
PV monitoring vendors in this set differ mainly in whether they deliver investigation structure, weather-aware interpretation, or managed operational workflows. The best fit depends on which team owns fault triage and how consistent the telemetry and weather inputs are across the fleet.
Engineering teams running recurring fleet performance reviews
Enertis Applus+ is best when engineering teams need consistent fleet performance reviews and deeper fault triage support through an engineering-led review workflow.
Asset owners standardizing fleet monitoring with weather-aware interpretation
meteocontrol fits asset owners that need weather-integrated monitoring so irradiance context improves interpretation beyond inverter status and supports automated alarm workflows.
Operations teams standardizing day-to-day maintenance triage across sites
Also Energy and Alectris fit operational teams that want alerting tied to investigation workflows and centralized fleet views for plant-level performance comparisons.
Portfolio owners relying on managed delivery and operational issue handling
RES, Voltalia, and BayWa r.e. align to teams that want managed monitoring implementation where monitoring outputs get mapped into operational processes and project site management workflows.
Operators with inverter and data-logger telemetry ecosystems that need centralized rollups
Solar-Log fits operators that want fleet-oriented monitoring that unifies inverter and data-logger sources into centralized operational status and alarm workflows.
Common failure modes in pv monitoring rollouts
Many pv monitoring projects fail when alarm outputs are not tied to an investigation workflow that matches how faults get handled in the field. Other failures happen when teams expect weather-aware interpretation without having consistent weather instrumentation and cross-site configuration.
Treating dashboards as a complete workflow instead of building a repeatable investigation path
Enertis Applus+ and juwi convert alarms and performance deviations into structured investigations or operational actions, so teams should require a workflow mapping before rollout.
Expecting weather-aware performance interpretation without adequate weather instrumentation or consistent configuration
meteocontrol depends on weather context inputs for richer analytics, so missing instrumentation or inconsistent cross-site rules reduce the value of weather-integrated interpretation.
Assuming string-level diagnostics will be available across all plants without validating installed telemetry granularity
Also Energy notes that string-level diagnostics require plant telemetry granularity, while Solar-Log and BayWa r.e. tie deeper module or string analytics to what devices and endpoints are available per site.
Overestimating automation and custom alarm logic depth without agreeing on integration patterns and governance
Enertis Applus+ and meteocontrol require sustained input for data mapping and agreed integration patterns, so teams should align governance and automation rules early with site owners.
Selecting a managed monitoring vendor but then requesting deep customization beyond the delivery scope
BayWa r.e. flags that automation depth for custom alarm logic can be limited by service setup, and RES flags that deep customization depends on delivery scope rather than direct UI control.
How We Selected and Ranked These Providers
We evaluated Enertis Applus+, meteocontrol, Also Energy, juwi, BayWa r.e., RES, Solar-Log, Voltalia, Alectris, and Solarig on monitoring output-to-action workflow fit, integration depth, and the amount of operational governance implied by the delivery model. Features accounted for 40% of the score because providers like Enertis Applus+ and meteocontrol differentiate through structured investigation workflows and weather-integrated interpretation.
Ease and value accounted for 30% each because vendors such as Solar-Log and Also Energy score higher when centralized fleet operational views reduce day-to-day reporting variability. Enertis Applus+ separated itself by engineering-led performance review workflow that converts monitored alarms and performance deviations into structured, repeatable investigations across multiple plants.
Frequently Asked Questions About pv monitoring
How do Enertis Applus+ and meteocontrol differ in handling performance investigations from monitored events?
Which services provide weather-integrated analysis instead of relying only on inverter telemetry?
How do Also Energy and juwi support day-to-day operations triage without exporting data to spreadsheets?
What breaks if fleet alarm routing is not aligned with site responsibilities in a managed monitoring program?
When should a team expect data migration work for existing telemetry and historian outputs?
How do Solar-Log and Solarig differ in configuration needs for ongoing plant monitoring?
Which vendors treat alarm and fault workflows as operational processes rather than report outputs?
How do Solarig and Also Energy approach admin controls for multi-site governance?
What integration gap most commonly blocks projects when using Voltalia versus meteocontrol for plant-level monitoring?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
- Environment EnergyTop 10 Best Solar Monitoring Services of 2026
- Environment EnergyTop 10 Best Residential Pv Design Services of 2026
- Data Science AnalyticsTop 10 Best Project Monitoring Services of 2026
- Environment EnergyTop 10 Best Pv Monitoring Software of 2026
- Environment EnergyTop 10 Best Solar Panel Monitoring Software of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Environment Energy alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of environment energy tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare environment energy tools→