Commissioned Research
Top 10 Best Locum Staffing Services of 2026

GITNUXSOFTWARE REVIEW

Healthcare Medicine

Top 10 Best Locum Staffing Services of 2026

Ranked comparison of top locum staffing services for facility teams, including AMN Healthcare, CHG Healthcare, and TinkBird Healthcare Staffing.

29 min readUpdated Editorially scoped research
How we ranked these tools
01Editorial Scope

Vendors set the topic, but our editors set the inclusion criteria and the evaluation framework before research starts.

02Source Research

Search agents gather the source set and the review record, including transcriptions of video reviews and podcasts.

Read our full methodology →

Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%

Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy

Locum staffing providers get facility teams temporary clinicians when demand spikes, sites face credentialing delays, or coverage gaps emerge. This ranked comparison helps operations and clinical leadership evaluate scale, credentialing workflows, and fulfillment throughput across the top options, using documented delivery models and measurable service coverage rather than marketing claims, with CHG Healthcare as a reference point for enterprise-grade execution.

Choose AMN Healthcare for managed locum coverage continuity when shifting schedules demand a large, diversified staffing partner, whereas TinkBird Healthcare Staffing is a strong fit when facility leaders need coordinated, time-critical shift changes with tight sourcing to placement execution.

Editor’s top 3 picks

Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.

Editor pick
1

AMN Healthcare

End-to-end coordination that blends clinician sourcing with onboarding packet progression toward assignment start dates.

Best for: Fits when facility staffing teams need managed locum coverage continuity across shifting schedules.

2

CHG Healthcare

Editor pick

Dedicated assignment management that handles shift changes and extension logistics across an active clinician slate.

Best for: Fits when facility operations teams need managed locum staffing execution with ongoing coverage coordination support.

3

TinkBird Healthcare Staffing

Editor pick

Assignment coordination workflow that turns facility intake into shift-level provider scheduling actions.

Best for: Fits when facility leaders need coordinated locum staffing for time-critical shift coverage changes.

Comparison Table

1
AMN HealthcareBest overall
enterprise_vendor
9.2/10
Overall
2
enterprise_vendor
8.8/10
Overall
3
8.5/10
Overall
4
8.2/10
Overall
5
7.9/10
Overall
6
7.6/10
Overall
7
7.2/10
Overall
8
6.9/10
Overall
9
6.6/10
Overall
10
6.3/10
Overall
#1

AMN Healthcare

enterprise_vendor

Largest diversified healthcare staffing company in the US offering locum tenens, travel nursing, and allied staffing.

9.2/10
Overall
Features9.4/10
Ease of Use9.1/10
Value8.9/10
Standout feature

End-to-end coordination that blends clinician sourcing with onboarding packet progression toward assignment start dates.

AMN Healthcare handles locum tenens staffing requests by pairing facilities with clinicians across common specialties and time-bound coverage needs, including short-term shift gaps and ongoing requests. Staffing operations receive structured intake for requirements such as specialty, site, coverage dates, and start constraints, then AMN coordinates the clinician pipeline through onboarding steps that support facility readiness. Credentialing support and medical licensure verification workflows are a central part of how placements move forward toward start.

A tradeoff appears in dependency on the facility for certain onboarding inputs such as licensure and site-specific documentation, because the workflow requires timely provider packet completion to avoid schedule slips. AMN is a strong fit when a facility needs managed staffing continuity across multiple shifts or consecutive coverage blocks and expects active coordination around provider availability and replacement coverage.

Pros
  • +Credentialing and licensure support built into the placement workflow
  • +Active substitution coordination for shift coverage continuity
  • +Facilities get structured intake for specialty and start-date requirements
  • +Broad temporary staffing coverage across clinician categories
Cons
  • –Facility-provided documentation timing can impact assignment start dates
  • –Automation depth is limited for facilities seeking self-serve assignment configuration
  • –Onboarding requirements vary by site and can add review cycles
  • –API access and provisioning controls are not the primary engagement surface
Use scenarios
  • Facility staffing operations teams

    Multiple shift gaps within one quarter

    Fewer uncovered shifts

  • Hospital medicine service lines

    Longer locum assignment extension support

    Sustained staffing levels

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Credentialing coordinators

    Document-heavy onboarding for new starts

    Faster compliance turnaround

    Onboarding support aligns provider packets with facility readiness steps for placement approval.

  • Rural hospital shift coordinators

    Emergency coverage for critical specialties

    Stable emergency coverage

    Temporary physician staffing coordination supports rapid ramp-up when sudden coverage gaps occur.

Best for: Fits when facility staffing teams need managed locum coverage continuity across shifting schedules.

#2

CHG Healthcare

enterprise_vendor

Parent company of CompHealth, Weatherby Healthcare, and Vista Staffing Solutions managing locum tenens at enterprise scale.

8.8/10
Overall
Features9.1/10
Ease of Use8.6/10
Value8.7/10
Standout feature

Dedicated assignment management that handles shift changes and extension logistics across an active clinician slate.

CHG Healthcare is best evaluated as an execution team for temporary physician staffing and related clinician categories where staffing orchestration matters more than self-serve ordering. It is oriented to credentialing package handling and facility onboarding coordination so clinical readiness steps do not block scheduling throughput. Facility managers get practical day-to-day handling for shift coverage changes and assignment extensions when volume spikes or demand shifts.

A key tradeoff is that deep staffing automation and open integration are not the primary surface. Facilities that require highly custom data flows or direct API-based automation usually need operational coordination instead of full system-to-system provisioning. CHG Healthcare fits most when an operations lead wants fewer internal handoffs during short-term coverage or a longer locum assignment that needs steady extensions.

Pros
  • +Strong coordination for shift coverage changes during active assignments
  • +Credentialing support reduces clinician readiness blockers for facilities
  • +Assignment extension handling supports continuity across longer coverage needs
  • +Specialty staffing orchestration reduces internal scheduling workload
Cons
  • –Limited emphasis on API-first automation compared with software-led competitors
  • –Facility onboarding inputs still require structured coordination from the client
  • –Customization depth for unique governance workflows may need extra effort
  • –Workflow visibility can feel operational instead of system-log driven
Use scenarios
  • Hospital operations teams

    Urgent specialty shift coverage gaps

    Fewer missed shifts

  • Medical directors and service lines

    Longer locum assignment continuity

    Sustained coverage continuity

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Compliance and credentialing staff

    Credentialing packet coordination

    Faster onboarding readiness

    CHG Healthcare supports clinician documentation flow so facility onboarding requirements are met for scheduling.

  • Rural facility administrators

    Per diem or short-term coverage

    Stable staffing coverage

    Coordinated staffing helps absorb fluctuating demand with managed clinician logistics.

Best for: Fits when facility operations teams need managed locum staffing execution with ongoing coverage coordination support.

#3

TinkBird Healthcare Staffing

agency

Locum tenens and permanent placement firm serving physicians, NPs, and PAs across the United States.

8.5/10
Overall
Features8.4/10
Ease of Use8.8/10
Value8.4/10
Standout feature

Assignment coordination workflow that turns facility intake into shift-level provider scheduling actions.

TinkBird Healthcare Staffing targets facilities that need quick turnaround for temporary physician staffing and nurse staffing requests with consistent coordination artifacts. The process typically starts with a structured facility intake that captures assignment timing, specialty or role, and onboarding constraints to reduce back-and-forth. Coordinators handle the operational side of credentialing documentation packaging and provider onboarding handoffs so teams can keep staffing decisions moving.

A key tradeoff is that deeper policy alignment often takes more prework than with vendors that already know a facility’s internal privileging and onboarding routines. TinkBird works best when staffing leadership can provide clear assignment parameters early, such as start time windows, shift patterns, and required compliance documents, to avoid late substitutions.

Pros
  • +Shift-level coordination workflow reduces scheduling churn
  • +Structured intake captures role, timing, and onboarding constraints
  • +Credentialing document packaging supports faster onboarding handoff
  • +Human coordinator communication supports rapid exception handling
Cons
  • –Requires earlier assignment detail to prevent last-minute swaps
  • –Extensibility depends on facility-specific process mapping
  • –RBAC-style governance controls are not a native self-serve model
Use scenarios
  • Nurse staffing managers

    Per diem gaps on rotating shifts

    Fewer uncovered shifts

  • ED operations directors

    Short-term locum physician coverage

    On-time coverage readiness

Show 1 more scenario
  • Clinical operations coordinators

    Specialty coverage during onboarding transitions

    Reduced onboarding delays

    Packages credentialing documentation and aligns facility onboarding steps to keep start dates stable.

Best for: Fits when facility leaders need coordinated locum staffing for time-critical shift coverage changes.

#4

LocumTenens.com

agency

Direct locum tenens staffing platform connecting healthcare facilities with temporary physicians and advanced practice providers.

8.2/10
Overall
Features7.9/10
Ease of Use8.5/10
Value8.3/10
Standout feature

Assignment coordination combines clinician sourcing with document intake routing to support facility onboarding from first request through extensions.

LocumTenens.com provides facility-facing locum tenens staffing workflows that center on clinician sourcing, assignment onboarding support, and coverage scheduling coordination.

Pros
  • +Managed coverage coordination reduces back-and-forth during shift planning
  • +Centralized request handling for assignments and extensions
  • +Credentialing document intake workflow supports facility onboarding steps
  • +Specialty and location matching targets rural and demand-surge coverage
Cons
  • –Less automation depth than API-first staffing platforms
  • –Sourcing outcomes depend on clinician availability by specialty and region
  • –Facilities still need internal coordination for privileging and payer steps
  • –Reporting granularity for timekeeping and approvals can lag complex operations

Best for: Fits when facilities need coordinated locum coverage and onboarding support, including compliance document intake for many specialties.

#5

Staff Care

agency

AMN Healthcare's locum tenens division providing temporary physician staffing to hospitals and group practices.

7.9/10
Overall
Features7.9/10
Ease of Use7.8/10
Value7.9/10
Standout feature

Assignment operations that keep short-term shift requests and longer locum continuity under one staffing workflow.

Staff Care sources and manages temporary physician staffing and allied health staffing for facilities that need short-term coverage and longer locum assignment continuity. The service centers on end-to-end assignment operations, including recruiting for specific specialties, coordinating onboarding steps, and routing shift requests to available clinicians.

Pros
  • +Operational coordination for per diem and short-term shift coverage
  • +Specialty sourcing designed for temporary assignments at facility level
  • +Assignment management reduces back-and-forth during ongoing placements
  • +Support workflow aligns with facility onboarding and readiness timelines
Cons
  • –Facility scheduling depends on service coordination, not self-serve shift control
  • –Limited visibility into scheduling automation details for complex multi-site rosters
  • –Credentialing and compliance documentation sequencing can extend lead time
  • –Integration depth is not presented as an API-first operations layer

Best for: Fits when facility teams need managed coverage across specialties with ongoing assignment support.

#6

Hayes Locums

agency

Locum tenens staffing firm providing physician and advanced practice placement with in-house credentialing and logistics.

7.6/10
Overall
Features7.6/10
Ease of Use7.3/10
Value7.8/10
Standout feature

Vendor-run assignment extension workflow that coordinates continuity when an initial locum end date shifts.

Hayes Locums focuses on temporary physician and advanced practice staffing for facilities that need dependable coverage cycles and documentation support. Its workflow is built around recruiting, credentialing document handling, and assignment coordination rather than a self-serve scheduling tool.

Pros
  • +Staffing operations manage sourcing and candidate handoff for urgent starts
  • +Assignment extension handling reduces rework when coverage dates change
  • +Credentialing document workflow is handled as part of the staffing process
  • +Communication cadence supports facility onboarding for each staffed engagement
Cons
  • –Admin control over provider lists is limited versus self-serve workforce tools
  • –API and automation surfaces are not described for direct system integration
  • –Timesheet and approval workflows depend more on staffing coordination than configuration
  • –Governance artifacts like RBAC and audit logs are not clearly published

Best for: Fits when facility staffing teams want vendor-led sourcing, credentialing handling, and assignment management.

#7

Aya Healthcare

agency

Diversified healthcare staffing company offering locum tenens, travel nursing, and per diem staffing services.

7.2/10
Overall
Features7.3/10
Ease of Use7.2/10
Value7.2/10
Standout feature

Single end-to-end coordination across multi-discipline locum assignments, with credentialing packet handling tied into onboarding support.

Aya Healthcare is distinct as a blended staffing operator spanning locum tenens physician coverage plus allied health and nursing fulfillment. Coverage workflows connect staffing coordination, credentialing packet handling, and assignment lifecycle support for shift-by-shift and extended stays.

Pros
  • +Blended staffing coverage across physicians plus allied health and nursing roles
  • +Assignment coordination supports both short-term fills and extended locum stays
  • +Credentialing packet handling aligns with facility onboarding workflows
  • +Ongoing assignment management reduces churn when requests change
Cons
  • –Does not present the same degree of facility-to-staff automation as API-first vendors
  • –Provider availability visibility can lag during rapid, last-minute request changes
  • –Governance and reporting depth depends on how facilities configure internal ownership
  • –Specialty edge cases may require more back-and-forth than standard requests

Best for: Fits when facility staffing teams need dependable coverage across multiple disciplines and assignment lengths.

#8

Soliant Health

agency

Healthcare staffing agency providing locum tenens, travel therapy, and allied health placement services.

6.9/10
Overall
Features7.1/10
Ease of Use6.8/10
Value6.8/10
Standout feature

Recruiter-led assignment coordination that keeps shift coverage and extension requests moving through onboarding and scheduling handoffs.

Soliant Health is a locum staffing service provider focused on temporary physician staffing and allied health staffing workflows for healthcare facilities. The delivery model emphasizes recruiter-driven sourcing, structured credentialing document collection, and ongoing assignment coordination through facility check-ins.

Pros
  • +Recruiter-led coordination for specialty and urgent short-term coverage requests
  • +Structured document collection for credentialing workflows used in facility onboarding
  • +Ongoing check-ins to handle schedule edits and assignment extensions
  • +Dedicated staffing support for allied health and therapy type placements
Cons
  • –Automation depth for provider matching and scheduling is not as transparent as marketplaces
  • –Facility onboarding timelines depend on document completeness from requested parties
  • –Limited visibility into internal automation rules for assignment extensions
  • –Complex multi-site rollouts can require tighter facility process alignment

Best for: Fits when facility teams need staffed coverage managed end-to-end with consistent recruiter oversight.

#9

MDstaffers

agency

Locum tenens staffing agency placing physicians and advanced practice providers in temporary and permanent roles.

6.6/10
Overall
Features6.6/10
Ease of Use6.5/10
Value6.8/10
Standout feature

Assignment continuity support that prioritizes extension planning when a locum engagement needs to run longer.

MDstaffers coordinates temporary physician staffing through a managed recruiting workflow that focuses on filling specific clinician shift and assignment needs. The service handles core facility steps like onboarding support and credentialing documentation routing to speed readiness for clinical work.

Pros
  • +Shift-focused matching for specialty coverage with clear assignment ownership
  • +Credentialing documentation routing reduces handoff friction for facilities
  • +Assignment extension support helps maintain continuity of coverage
  • +Staffing coordination emphasizes start-date accuracy for coverage windows
Cons
  • –Limited transparency into internal scheduling rules and staffing pipeline
  • –Requires timely facility inputs for licensure and onboarding documents
  • –Automation depth for integrations and workflow APIs is not a core emphasis
  • –Narrower visibility into timekeeping and approval workflow details

Best for: Fits when a facility needs managed locum assignment coverage across defined start windows.

#10

Enterprise Medical Services

agency

Locum tenens and permanent physician staffing firm serving hospitals and medical groups nationwide.

6.3/10
Overall
Features6.3/10
Ease of Use6.1/10
Value6.4/10
Standout feature

Credentialing-focused assignment preparation coordinated through recruiter workflow, rather than facility-side self-service tooling.

Enterprise Medical Services handles locum staffing through direct recruiter-led sourcing and facility coordination for physician and advanced practice needs. Strength shows in its workflow around credentialing documents and assignment readiness for recurring and single-site coverage.

Pros
  • +Recruiter-led placement process for physician and advanced practice coverage
  • +Structured attention to credentialing document flow for assignment start readiness
  • +Facility onboarding support during scheduling and provider transition periods
  • +Manages provider availability for both short-term and extended assignments
Cons
  • –Limited evidence of facility self-service scheduling automation
  • –Less transparent integration and API surface for downstream systems
  • –Workflow depth can depend on recruiter responsiveness for complex sites
  • –Document turnaround and exception handling require active coordination

Best for: Fits when facility teams need managed locum sourcing and onboarding coordination more than system integrations.

Conclusion

After evaluating 10 locum staffing, AMN Healthcare stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.

Our Top Pick
AMN Healthcare

Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.

How to Choose the Right Locum Staffing

Locum staffing is handled through coordinated temporary physician staffing and allied health staffing workflows that move clinicians from sourcing into credentialing packet progression toward assignment start dates. This buyer’s guide covers AMN Healthcare, CHG Healthcare, TinkBird Healthcare Staffing, LocumTenens.com, Staff Care, Hayes Locums, Aya Healthcare, Soliant Health, MDstaffers, and Enterprise Medical Services.

Across these services, facility teams typically compare how assignment management handles shift changes, how onboarding document intake gets routed, and how much automation depth exists when coverage dates extend or swap. The guide focuses on the mechanisms that staffing operations actually run, including recruiter-led versus vendor-run coordination and facility onboarding support that impacts readiness timelines.

Locum Staffing for facilities: managed clinician sourcing and assignment coordination

Locum staffing is the operational workflow that turns temporary physician staffing requests into scheduled shift coverage by coordinating sourcing, credentialing support, onboarding packet progression, and assignment extensions. Facility teams also rely on assignment management to route compliance document intake and coordinate changes when shift coverage updates occur mid-assignment.

AMN Healthcare emphasizes end-to-end coordination that blends clinician sourcing with onboarding packet progression toward assignment start dates, with credentialing and licensure support built into the placement workflow. CHG Healthcare emphasizes dedicated assignment management that handles shift changes and extension logistics across an active clinician slate, with credentialing support aimed at reducing clinician readiness blockers for facilities.

Locum Staffing capabilities that change facility execution

Facilities feel the impact most in the handoffs between request intake, onboarding packet progression, and shift or extension changes that occur after coverage starts.

The providers in this guide differ most on how much assignment coordination they run versus how much facility input they require at each checkpoint.

  • End-to-end assignment flow from sourcing into readiness

    AMN Healthcare coordinates clinician sourcing and onboarding packet progression toward assignment start dates with credentialing and licensure support built into the placement workflow. Aya Healthcare also runs end-to-end coordination across multi-discipline assignments with credentialing packet handling tied to onboarding support.

  • Shift-change and active assignment extension logistics

    CHG Healthcare handles shift changes and extension logistics across an active clinician slate as a dedicated assignment management function. Hayes Locums runs a vendor-led assignment extension workflow to coordinate continuity when end dates shift.

  • Facility intake that turns into scheduling actions at the shift level

    TinkBird Healthcare Staffing converts facility intake into shift-level provider scheduling actions through an assignment coordination workflow. LocumTenens.com combines assignment coordination with document intake routing to support facility onboarding from first request through extensions.

  • Credentialing document routing and onboarding readiness support

    Soliant Health uses recruiter-led assignment coordination that moves shift coverage and extension requests through onboarding and scheduling handoffs while collecting documents for credentialing workflows. MDstaffers routes credentialing documentation as part of assignment continuity planning when engagements run longer.

  • Managed coverage operations for per diem and short-term shift requests

    Staff Care keeps short-term shift requests and longer locum continuity under one staffing workflow with operational coordination for per diem and short-term coverage. Enterprise Medical Services coordinates credentialing-focused assignment preparation through recruiter workflow rather than facility-side self-service tooling.

A decision framework for Locum Staffing execution and control

Facility teams should choose providers based on where assignment coordination control lives during scheduling churn, during mid-assignment changes, and during extension windows. The right fit depends on how quickly coverage updates can be converted into recruiter and onboarding actions without waiting on repeated facility back-and-forth.

  • Map where shift changes are created in operations

    If shift changes and extensions are handled during an active clinician slate, CHG Healthcare is built around managing those updates through dedicated assignment management. If assignment extension continuity is the dominant pain point when end dates move, Hayes Locums focuses on vendor-run extension workflow coordination.

  • Choose the intake-to-scheduling path that matches facility timing

    If shift-level coverage changes must be reflected quickly in schedules, TinkBird Healthcare Staffing uses a shift-level coordination workflow that turns facility intake into scheduling actions. If onboarding packet progression and extension support must be coordinated from the first request, LocumTenens.com combines assignment coordination with centralized request handling for assignments and extensions.

  • Decide how much onboarding readiness should be run by the provider

    For facilities that want credentialing and licensure support embedded in placement execution, AMN Healthcare builds that support into the placement workflow. For facilities that need credentialing packet handling tied into onboarding support across physicians plus allied health and nursing roles, Aya Healthcare coordinates the full flow.

  • Verify automation and integration expectations against real transparency

    Facilities seeking software-led automation should treat CHG Healthcare’s limited emphasis on API-first automation as a mismatch when system integration is a gating requirement. Facilities that need visible automation depth for provider matching and scheduling rules may find Soliant Health’s automation transparency less clear than marketplace-style platforms.

  • Set governance expectations for facility-provided inputs and scheduling control

    Facilities that plan to self-manage provider lists should note that Hayes Locums limits admin control over provider lists compared with self-serve workforce tools. If structured intake quality determines outcomes, staff teams should plan for earlier assignment detail to avoid last-minute swaps in TinkBird’s scheduling churn cases.

Who should buy these Locum Staffing services

These providers fit facility teams that run recurring temporary physician staffing and allied health staffing through operational workflows that must keep schedules stable while onboarding documents and readiness checks progress.

The best candidates align internal staffing processes with how each vendor runs assignment coordination, recruiter oversight, and extension handling.

  • Hospital staffing operations teams managing frequent shift swaps

    CHG Healthcare is built to handle shift changes and extension logistics across an active clinician slate, reducing operational interruption when coverage updates occur mid-assignment. TinkBird Healthcare Staffing also targets shift-level coordination to reduce scheduling churn when facilities need time-critical changes.

  • Facility teams that require provider-side credentialing readiness

    AMN Healthcare includes credentialing and licensure support inside the placement workflow with onboarding packet progression toward assignment start dates. Aya Healthcare coordinates credentialing packet handling tied into onboarding support across physicians plus allied health and nursing roles.

  • Facilities that treat onboarding document intake as a workflow gate

    LocumTenens.com routes document intake during assignment coordination from first request through extensions. Soliant Health uses structured document collection for credentialing workflows tied to facility onboarding timelines.

  • Organizations prioritizing vendor-run continuity during extension windows

    Hayes Locums coordinates continuity through a vendor-run assignment extension workflow when end dates shift. MDstaffers prioritizes extension planning and assignment continuity support when engagements need to run longer.

  • Multi-site or multi-discipline staffing buyers needing broad coverage spans

    Aya Healthcare runs single end-to-end coordination across multi-discipline locum assignments with assignment coordination supporting both short-term fills and extended stays. Staff Care blends operational coordination for per diem and short-term shift coverage with ongoing assignment support across specialties.

Common Locum Staffing buying pitfalls

Facilities often misjudge the point where coordination responsibility shifts from the provider to facility teams. They also overestimate how quickly assignment changes can be reflected when earlier intake detail is missing or when facility-provided documentation timing delays start readiness.

  • Choosing a provider without aligning intake timing to shift-level scheduling needs

    TinkBird Healthcare Staffing requires earlier assignment detail to prevent last-minute swaps, so facilities should avoid sending incomplete role and timing inputs near shift start. Soliant Health’s recruiter-led coordination still depends on document completeness, so late credentialing inputs can delay onboarding readiness.

  • Assuming the provider can run readiness without facility documentation timing discipline

    AMN Healthcare notes that facility-provided documentation timing can impact assignment start dates. LocumTenens.com routes onboarding document intake, so facilities should expect coordinated routing to still depend on timely completeness of requested documents.

  • Expecting API-first self-serve configuration without confirming automation transparency

    CHG Healthcare limits emphasis on API-first automation and still requires structured coordination from the client for onboarding inputs. Enterprise Medical Services coordinates credentialing-focused assignment preparation through recruiter workflow with limited evidence of facility self-service scheduling automation.

  • Overlooking operational mismatch between managed workflows and internal scheduling control

    Hayes Locums limits admin control over provider lists compared with self-serve workforce tools, so facility teams that need list-level control may see friction. Staff Care keeps scheduling under its staffing workflow, so facilities that expect shift control from self-serve operations may find visibility into scheduling automation details limited for complex multi-site rosters.

How We Selected and Ranked These Providers

We evaluated each provider on end-to-end assignment coordination from request intake through onboarding packet progression and into shift coverage or assignment extensions. We scored features at 40% weight using the presence and maturity of coordination workflows for shift changes, extensions, and credentialing document routing.

We weighted ease and value at 30% each based on how directly each provider’s operations reduce scheduling churn and readiness blockers for facility teams. AMN Healthcare set the top position by blending clinician sourcing with onboarding packet progression toward assignment start dates and by embedding credentialing and licensure support into the placement workflow.

Frequently Asked Questions About Locum Staffing

How does AMN Healthcare handle short-term shift gaps without derailing credentialing timelines?
AMN Healthcare structures intake around specialty, site, and coverage dates, then coordinates onboarding steps to move toward assignment start dates. The workflow includes credentialing support and medical licensure verification, but it relies on timely facility packet inputs like site-specific documentation to prevent schedule slips.
Which provider is better when facility teams need ongoing shift coverage changes and assignment extensions managed day to day?
CHG Healthcare fits when operations teams need assignment management for shift coverage changes and extension logistics during active demand spikes. TinkBird also coordinates shift-level actions from intake, but CHG Healthcare emphasizes daily execution handling more than facility-side scheduling tooling.
What tradeoff should facility teams expect from TinkBird Healthcare Staffing when privileging rules differ from internal workflows?
TinkBird Healthcare Staffing can require additional prework when deep policy alignment takes more effort than with vendors that already match a facility’s privileging and onboarding routines. That tradeoff shows up when coordinators must package credentialing documentation in a way that fits the facility onboarding constraints.
When does LocumTenens.com become a better fit than recruiter-led sourcing models for facility onboarding workflows?
LocumTenens.com centers assignment onboarding support and document intake routing from the first request through extensions. Soliant Health and MDstaffers also coordinate compliance steps, but LocumTenens.com places more operational emphasis on routing clinician compliance artifacts tied to facility onboarding.
How do Hayes Locums workflows manage assignment start-date changes after the initial end date is set?
Hayes Locums runs a vendor-led assignment extension workflow that coordinates continuity when an engagement end date shifts. AMN Healthcare also supports ongoing coverage blocks, but Hayes Locums focuses on documentation handling and extension coordination through staffing operations rather than facility-driven scheduling changes.
Which service provider fits facilities that need multi-discipline coverage across locum physicians plus allied health and nurse staffing under one coordination lane?
Aya Healthcare fits teams that need centralized coordination across multiple disciplines with a single assignment lifecycle. Other options like AMN Healthcare concentrate on locum tenens physician staffing plus time-bound coverage needs, while Aya also connects credentialing packet handling to allied health and nursing fulfillment workflows.
What breaks if facility onboarding inputs are delayed when using enterprise-style credentialing and recruiting workflows like Enterprise Medical Services?
Enterprise Medical Services coordinates credentialing document readiness through recruiter-led workflows, so delayed onboarding inputs can stall assignment readiness for both recurring and single-site coverage. CHG Healthcare shows a similar dependency, but Enterprise Medical Services has limited emphasis on facility-side automation in public materials, so delays translate into more operational handoffs.
How do integrations and API capabilities typically differ between CHG Healthcare and provider-focused marketplaces for onboarding automation?
CHG Healthcare is evaluated as an execution team and does not prioritize deep staffing automation or direct API-based provisioning for system-to-system workflows. In contrast, LocumTenens.com and AMN Healthcare are centered on coordinated operational steps, so facilities should plan for workflow coordination rather than expecting self-serve API automation as a primary delivery mechanism.
Which provider is most suitable for facility teams that want to minimize handoffs for shift coverage changes while keeping credentialing packet handling in one operational loop?
CHG Healthcare is geared toward fewer internal handoffs by coordinating shift coverage changes and assignment extensions alongside credentialing and onboarding coordination. Hayes Locums also keeps sourcing and compliance work vendor-run, but CHG Healthcare’s day-to-day execution focus is more aligned to rapid coverage churn.

Tools reviewed

Primary sources checked during evaluation.

Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.

Commissioned Research

Funding and competing interests

This study was co-funded by several of the vendors assessed in it. No single vendor funded it. Funders could propose the market studied.

They had no role in selecting vendors, setting or weighting criteria, analysing data or drawing conclusions, and they received the same factual-accuracy check as every other vendor assessed.

Market definition, inclusion rules and criteria weights were fixed by an editor before research began and did not change afterwards. Editorial process →

Keep exploring

FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS

Not on this list? Let’s fix that.

Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.

Apply for a Listing

WHAT THIS INCLUDES

  • Where buyers compare

    Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.

  • Editorial write-up

    We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.

  • On-page brand presence

    You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.

  • Kept up to date

    We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.