Commissioned Research
Top 10 Best Business Startup Services of 2026

GITNUXSOFTWARE REVIEW

Economics

Top 10 Best Business Startup Services of 2026

Compare business startup services for founders, including BetterLegal, Bizee, and Techstars, and match options to team needs and tradeoffs.

19 min readUpdated Editorially scoped research
How we ranked these tools
01Editorial Scope

Vendors set the topic, but our editors set the inclusion criteria and the evaluation framework before research starts.

02Source Research

Agents extract product evidence with provenance, then collect written reviews and transcribe video reviews and podcasts.

Read our full methodology →

Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%

Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page. This does not influence our reviews. Editorial policy

Business startup services turn incorporation and early compliance into a repeatable workflow that founders, operators, and legal teams can provision, document, and track. This comparison helps evidence-minded buyers weigh automation depth, entity formation scope, registered agent support, and contract-ready operating agreement coverage against DIY-friendly tools and accelerator-backed paths.

BetterLegal is the best overall for business startups that need guided formation and governance document prep because its workflow turns entity inputs into filing-ready organizational documents and handles registered agent setup, while Techstars is the better fit if you want mentor-led execution and investor communication rather than direct legal formation.

Editor’s top 3 picks

Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.

Editor pick
1

BetterLegal

Formation workflow that ties entity selection inputs to filing-ready organizational documents plus registered agent setup.

Best for: Fits when a startup needs guided formation and governance document preparation with low paperwork friction.

2

Bizee

Editor pick

Formation workflow guidance that turns entity and ownership inputs into state filing-ready document packets.

Best for: Fits when founders want guided entity formation and document preparation with optional registered agent coverage.

3

Techstars

Editor pick

Cohort-based mentor matching that pairs founders with reviews tied to progress checkpoints.

Best for: Fits when founders need mentor-led execution and investor communication, not direct legal formation handling.

Comparison Table

1
BetterLegalBest overall
specialist
9.0/10
Overall
2
specialist
8.7/10
Overall
3
8.6/10
Overall
4
specialist
8.5/10
Overall
5
specialist
8.1/10
Overall
6
7.7/10
Overall
7
specialist
7.4/10
Overall
8
7.0/10
Overall
9
specialist
6.9/10
Overall
10
6.7/10
Overall
#1

BetterLegal

specialist

Automates business formation and provides operating agreements.

9.0/10
Overall
Features9.0/10
Ease of Use9.0/10
Value9.0/10
Standout feature

Formation workflow that ties entity selection inputs to filing-ready organizational documents plus registered agent setup.

BetterLegal focuses on business formation tasks that move from entity selection to filing-ready documents, including organization-level paperwork.

The workflow is designed for founders who want guided completion of required fields, output packaging, and coordinated post-formation steps.

For governance work, BetterLegal supports documentation used in operating agreement creation and founder equity arrangements tied to early company setup.

Pros
  • +Guided entity selection flow reduces mistakes in formation inputs
  • +Document assembly for organizational paperwork is built around filing requirements
  • +Registered agent and post-formation steps are coordinated in one workflow
  • +Equity and governance documents are supported as part of the formation package
Cons
  • –Limited fit for founders needing custom partnership agreement drafting
  • –Automation stays form-driven and does not replace attorney review for edge cases
  • –Governance configuration flexibility is narrower than bespoke counsel workflows
  • –No public emphasis on integration depth via external APIs for provisioning
Use scenarios
  • Startup founders starting first entity

    Coordinate EIN application during setup

    Progress toward EIN completion

  • Small legal operations teams

    Centralize filed formation records

    Faster access to records

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Solo LLC founders

    Prepare standard domestic LLC package

    Submitted formation package

    Guided inputs and filing coordination produce an organized formation submission set for LLC creation.

  • LLC members and management

    Generate operating agreement from inputs

    Usable governance documents

    Template-based governance documents are produced from guided ownership and management details.

Best for: Fits when a startup needs guided formation and governance document preparation with low paperwork friction.

#2

Bizee

specialist

Offers free business formation services with state fee payment required.

8.7/10
Overall
Features8.7/10
Ease of Use8.7/10
Value8.7/10
Standout feature

Formation workflow guidance that turns entity and ownership inputs into state filing-ready document packets.

Bizee focuses on business formation workflows for founders who need entity selection guidance and guided business registration steps. The service routes users through filing document inputs such as articles, ownership details, and business address information, then handles preparation for state filing.

Bizee also covers add-on items like registered agent service and ongoing compliance reminders that keep formation tasks from ending at submission. Automation is mostly workflow-driven through form capture and guided checklists rather than through developer-first API integration.

Pros
  • +Guided formation questionnaire reduces missed fields during state filings
  • +Registered agent add-on supports continuity after submission
  • +Clear document readiness flow for organizer and articles inputs
  • +Compliance reminders help track post-formation tasks
Cons
  • –Automation is workflow-driven, with limited programmatic extensibility
  • –Governance controls like audit trails are not a primary deliverable
  • –Complex governance documents may need manual review by counsel
  • –API-first integration for internal systems is not a stated core capability
Use scenarios
  • Remote founders and teams

    Set up managed business address

    Repeatable correspondence process

  • Early-stage small businesses

    Combine administration with formation records

    Better early cash recordkeeping

Show 2 more scenarios
  • New business owners

    Coordinate EIN application steps

    Organized EIN workflow

    Guided workflow supports handling EIN-related information and step sequencing for a more organized process.

  • Founders forming an LLC

    Prepare LLC filing document set

    Traceable LLC submission

    Guided inputs prepare an LLC submission and organize a traceable filing document package.

Best for: Fits when founders want guided entity formation and document preparation with optional registered agent coverage.

#3

Techstars

other

Operates startup accelerators and provides pre-seed investment.

8.6/10
Overall
Features8.6/10
Ease of Use8.6/10
Value8.6/10
Standout feature

Cohort-based mentor matching that pairs founders with reviews tied to progress checkpoints.

Techstars is a startup accelerator and business startup services network that runs mentor-led programs tied to measurable company milestones. Its core delivery centers on cohorts, structured guidance, and founder access to domain mentors and investors who review plans and progress.

Techstars also supports operational rollout through program workflows that encourage customer discovery, go-to-market testing, and fundraising readiness. The offering is less about building legal entities end to end and more about improving early execution and investor communication through program-managed cadence.

Pros
  • +Cohort cadence with mentor reviews focused on execution milestones
  • +Strong mentor network coverage across fundraising and early go-to-market
  • +Investor touchpoints shaped around pitch readiness and progress tracking
  • +Program workflows reduce the overhead of planning learning iterations
Cons
  • –Limited hands-on support for entity formation workflows like filings
  • –Decision-making pace depends on mentor availability and cohort fit
  • –Less prescriptive automation for operational processes outside the program
  • –Requires founder availability to attend reviews and implement feedback
Use scenarios
  • Technology startups testing MVP

    Plan customer discovery experiments

    Stronger demand evidence

  • Founder-led startup teams

    Build milestone-based operating discipline

    Consistent progress

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Teams pursuing enterprise pilots

    Adapt for corporate pilot needs

    More informed pilot plan

    Corporate connections and mentor guidance support planning for partnership pilots and product adaptation.

  • Startups shaping first go-to-market

    Sharpen positioning and acquisition priorities

    Clearer GTM iteration plan

    Program feedback helps teams refine customer acquisition plans and execution priorities.

Best for: Fits when founders need mentor-led execution and investor communication, not direct legal formation handling.

#4

LegalZoom

specialist

Provides online legal services including business formation for LLCs and corporations.

8.5/10
Overall
Features8.5/10
Ease of Use8.5/10
Value8.5/10
Standout feature

A guided questionnaire produces a jurisdiction-ready formation packet with supporting organization documents.

LegalZoom’s workflow starts with guided choices for entity selection and then produces the formation package that can be submitted to the relevant jurisdiction using the provided instructions. The service also generates commonly used governance documents for operating structures, such as LLC operating agreement content and corporation organization materials. This approach reduces the need to coordinate multiple vendors during the early formation window.

Pros
  • +Guided formation flow reduces omissions during document preparation
  • +Template-based governance documents cover frequent startup operating needs
  • +Jurisdiction-focused submission instructions support self-filing workflows
  • +Optional registered agent and compliance add-ons extend formation coverage
Cons
  • –Template-driven content can feel rigid for negotiated founder terms
  • –Complex multi-entity structures often require additional external legal help
  • –No direct automation for cap table mechanics beyond formation-related paperwork
  • –Integrated compliance needs may require managing multiple add-ons
Use scenarios
  • Solo founders

    Form an LLC with templates

    Entity paperwork completed faster

  • Early-stage startups

    Incorporate and set governance

    Governance documents in place

Show 1 more scenario
  • Team with outside counsel

    Provide draft documents to review

    Review cycle reduced

    Template outputs give counsel a starting point for edits and risk adjustments.

Best for: Fits when founders need standard entity formation documents with guided instructions and minimal drafting iterations.

#5

Rocket Lawyer

specialist

Delivers online legal services, document creation, and business incorporation.

8.1/10
Overall
Features8.1/10
Ease of Use8.2/10
Value8.0/10
Standout feature

Attorney-reviewed formation and agreement documents generated from structured intake.

Rocket Lawyer’s core strength is structured document generation for early-stage legal needs, including formation packages and recurring agreements that founders can adapt as the company changes. The workflow reduces drafting uncertainty by walking users through required inputs and producing finalized documents for signature. The support model adds attorney review to the document set, which helps for higher-risk clauses and consistency across documents.

Pros
  • +Guided formation and agreement drafting with attorney-reviewed outputs
  • +Document library supports recurring updates as business needs change
  • +Add-on registered agent services reduce coordination overhead
  • +Clear input flows reduce manual drafting and revision cycles
Cons
  • –Form-driven automation limits custom governance and approval workflows
  • –Deeper entity lifecycle controls require external tools for tracking
  • –Coverage depth varies across niche contract structures
Use scenarios
  • Solo founders and early startups

    Create formation documents quickly

    Faster incorporation package completion

  • Small business legal ops

    Standardize recurring agreement templates

    Reduced drafting inconsistency

Show 1 more scenario
  • Teams adding a registered agent

    Delegate filings and compliance mail

    Less administrative coordination

    Registered agent add-ons centralize receipt of official communications for the formed entity.

Best for: Fits when a startup needs guided document creation for formation and key agreements without building custom legal ops.

#6

Y Combinator

other

Provides seed funding and mentorship for early-stage startups.

7.7/10
Overall
Features7.7/10
Ease of Use7.7/10
Value7.7/10
Standout feature

Cohort-based mentorship plus alumni network access that drives rapid founder feedback on product-market fit hypotheses.

Y Combinator runs an accelerator-style business startup program that pairs founder coaching with an application and selection pipeline. Its distinct capability is structured support around early company formation and early traction experiments, with a shared curriculum delivered through program events and office hours.

Pros
  • +Structured founder mentorship cadence with repeated feedback loops
  • +Extensive alumni network for customer and hiring intros
  • +Program events create fast alignment on early go-to-market experiments
  • +Coaching helps reduce blind spots during validation and iteration cycles
Cons
  • –Selection-based admission limits predictable access for planned startups
  • –No product API or automation surface for operational workflows
  • –Hands-on support depth varies by cohort and mentor availability
  • –Admin governance tooling like RBAC and audit logs is not provided
Use scenarios
  • Technology and developer-led teams

    Run rapid customer development cycles

    Sharper traction goals

  • Early-stage companies hiring first employees

    Use program credibility for recruiting

    Stronger hiring narrative

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Pre-seed and seed teams

    Practice fundraising narrative and positioning

    Better investor readiness

    The program helps teams explain traction and progress to early-stage investors with more focus.

  • Accelerator participants

    Prepare for Demo Day presentation

    Practiced pitch delivery

    Founders turn product milestones into a concise investor presentation for a focused audience.

Best for: Fits when founders need tight mentorship cycles and network access during early validation and product iteration.

#7

CorpNet

specialist

Offers business formation, compliance, and registered agent services for new companies.

7.4/10
Overall
Features7.4/10
Ease of Use7.4/10
Value7.4/10
Standout feature

Managed registered agent continuity paired with formation packet generation for state submission readiness.

CorpNet supports business formation workflows with guided document preparation, state-specific filing packages, and ongoing registered agent handling options. The provider’s engagement is structured around getting entities created in the correct jurisdiction, collecting required founder and business details, and producing the filing-ready outputs for submission.

Pros
  • +State-focused formation packet creation reduces missing-form risk
  • +Guided intake turns entity details into filing-ready documents
  • +Registered agent handling supports continuity after formation filings
  • +EIN facilitation helps cover a frequent startup setup dependency
Cons
  • –Entity selection support is procedural, not strategic cap-table modeling
  • –Limited workflow automation for post-formation governance beyond formation tasks
  • –Review cycles depend on timely document responses from founders
  • –API and extensibility are not positioned for systems-led provisioning
Use scenarios
  • Entrepreneurs starting an LLC

    Coordinate state formation filings

    Guided formation process

  • Businesses with multiple locations

    Organize licensing records and renewals

    Clear upcoming deadlines

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Newly formed businesses

    Assemble EIN and state registration info

    Coordinated registration materials

    It gathers entity and responsible-party information for EIN and related state registration workflows.

  • Companies managing entity maintenance

    Prepare amendment and update filings

    Prepared entity update filings

    It coordinates corporate maintenance filings when entity details or circumstances change.

Best for: Fits when a founder needs managed business registration paperwork and administrative setup tasks handled end to end.

#8

Harbor Compliance

specialist

Provides entity formation and license management for nonprofits and businesses.

7.0/10
Overall
Features7.0/10
Ease of Use7.0/10
Value7.0/10
Standout feature

Registered agent service tied to ongoing compliance tracking and document handling for one continuous compliance workflow.

Harbor Compliance focuses on business compliance workflows that startup teams must complete after entity formation, including annual and ongoing obligations. Its core deliverables center on registered agent services paired with compliance calendar management and document handling so administrative steps do not stall early operations.

Pros
  • +Registered agent plus compliance administration in a single operating workflow
  • +Compliance calendar management reduces missed recurring obligations risk
  • +Document handling supports centralized ownership of compliance records
  • +Clear handoff between formation inputs and ongoing compliance posture
Cons
  • –Startup formation scope can be narrower than full legal drafting services
  • –State-by-state compliance variance can require active review from founders
  • –Automation depth depends on the completeness of submitted onboarding data
  • –Limited breadth for non-compliance startup tasks like cap table modeling
Use scenarios
  • Businesses opening new locations

    Research licenses and application prep

    More complete license applications

  • Founders forming entities

    Prepare LLC, corporation, or nonprofit package

    Coordinated filing process

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Growing startups entering new states

    Coordinate foreign qualification work

    Maintained multistate operations

    It manages foreign qualification and related state compliance tasks with registered agent coverage.

  • Businesses with recurring filings

    Track annual reports and good standing tasks

    Better visibility into deadlines

    Compliance monitoring improves deadline visibility and filing readiness for recurring obligations.

Best for: Fits when a new entity needs ongoing compliance execution and registered agent coverage with minimal operational overhead.

#9

MyCompanyWorks

specialist

Offers online business formation and registered agent services.

6.9/10
Overall
Features6.9/10
Ease of Use6.9/10
Value6.9/10
Standout feature

Formation and compliance support stays connected through the same onboarding workflow, reducing handoffs between unrelated steps.

MyCompanyWorks is oriented toward turning business formation inputs into completed filing-ready materials, including founder and ownership documentation that reduces manual rework. The onboarding flow is built around collecting company details and translating them into the specific documents required for registration and early operations. It is a good fit when founders want step-by-step assistance through entity selection decisions and the paperwork that follows.

Pros
  • +Guided entity selection process converts inputs into filing-ready materials
  • +Ongoing compliance paperwork supports early-stage operational consistency
  • +Document outputs reduce the need for founder-led document stitching
  • +Founder ownership documentation workflow limits gaps during setup
Cons
  • –Workflow customization is limited for teams using their own document templates
  • –Automation depth is lighter than API-first business operations tools
Use scenarios
  • First-time founders

    Entity selection to registration documents

    Faster setup with fewer omissions

  • Startup legal coordinators

    Early equity and ownership documentation

    Cleaner handoff to counsel

Show 1 more scenario
  • Operations leads

    Ongoing compliance paperwork

    Less compliance churn

    Maintains operational documentation support after registration to reduce recurring administrative gaps.

Best for: Fits when founders want managed guidance from entity selection through early operating documentation.

#10

Northwest Registered Agent

specialist

Provides business formation services with a focus on privacy and registered agent support.

6.7/10
Overall
Features6.7/10
Ease of Use6.7/10
Value6.7/10
Standout feature

Staffed registered agent coverage with structured document intake that ties back to formation workflows.

Northwest Registered Agent focuses on business formation execution paired with ongoing registered agent service. Core deliverables include entity setup workflows, name and jurisdiction selection assistance, and formation document handling for state filing.

Pros
  • +Registered agent mail handling reduces missed notices for ongoing compliance
  • +Formation workflow guides entity selection and filing readiness checks
  • +Document delivery process supports founders who avoid manual state correspondence
  • +Staffed coverage supports time-sensitive legal and tax document intake
Cons
  • –Limited workflow depth for founder agreements and equity admin
  • –Some startup formation items require external drafting rather than built-in templates
  • –Automation is oriented around filing and documents, not end-to-end investor readiness
  • –Governance tooling for ongoing company administration is light outside agent needs
Use scenarios
  • Solo founders and home-based businesses

    Protect home address in filings

    More separation of personal details

  • Remote freelancers and small business owners

    Manage scanned mail and forwarding

    Managed correspondence workflow

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Multi-state expanding companies

    Coordinate foreign qualification and agent coverage

    Centralized administration

    It coordinates additional jurisdiction obligations with registered agent coverage and notice handling.

  • LLC founders starting a new business

    Form an LLC with agent setup

    Submitted LLC package

    It supports LLC formation document preparation and state submission with ongoing agent coverage.

Best for: Fits when a startup team needs reliable registered agent intake tied to formation document handling.

Conclusion

After evaluating 10 business startup, BetterLegal stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.

Our Top Pick
BetterLegal

Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.

Frequently Asked Questions About Business Startup

Which service fits a startup that needs formation and key agreements generated from structured intake?
Rocket Lawyer fits teams that want attorney-reviewed formation and agreement documents generated from structured intake. LegalZoom can also generate jurisdiction-ready formation packets from guided questionnaires, but it is more form-first than multi-document template management.
How does document-driven formation delivery differ from accelerator-style support when entity work is ready?
Techstars delivers cohort mentor guidance tied to execution milestones and investor communication rather than entity provisioning workflows. In contrast, BetterLegal keeps the workflow centered on filing-ready organizational documents and governance documentation after entity selection.
When should a startup choose a service that keeps formation and ongoing compliance connected in one workflow?
MyCompanyWorks fits when entity selection and early operating documentation need to stay connected through managed onboarding. Harbor Compliance fits when formation status must be converted into registered agent and ongoing compliance calendar actions without separate handoffs.
How are registered agent responsibilities handled across service providers that offer ongoing coverage?
Northwest Registered Agent pairs formation document handling with staffed registered agent intake for legal and tax documents. Harbor Compliance also ties registered agent coverage to ongoing compliance tracking, while CorpNet pairs registered agent options with formation packet generation for state submission readiness.
What tradeoff appears when a provider focuses on guided form capture instead of API-first automation?
Bizee is built around workflow-driven form capture and guided checklists, which limits integration options for developer-built systems. Rocket Lawyer similarly centers on structured document generation and template access, so automation tends to stay inside document workflows rather than through external API connections.
What breaks if governance documents require detailed equity terms beyond standard founder templates?
BetterLegal focuses on practical governance document preparation tied to filing-ready outputs, but teams needing highly customized equity mechanics may still require separate legal drafting for edge cases. Rocket Lawyer can reduce drafting effort through structured intake, but it still relies on structured forms and template outputs for complex governance language.
How do services handle jurisdiction-ready filing packets before submission?
CorpNet packages state-specific filing readiness by collecting founder and business details and producing organizer materials and submission-ready outputs. BetterLegal similarly ties entity selection inputs to filing-ready organizational documents, including registered agent setup steps.
Which provider is best aligned with teams that want administrator-style compliance calendars after formation?
Harbor Compliance is designed around registered agent service plus compliance calendar management and document handling so ongoing obligations do not stall operations. Northwest Registered Agent supports ongoing registered agent intake tied back to formation workflows, but its standout focus is the staffed agent function rather than compliance calendar execution.
Which provider fits a startup that wants EIN collection workflows bundled with entity setup?
Northwest Registered Agent includes EIN collection workflows that fit common startup onboarding alongside formation document handling. CorpNet also supports EIN facilitation as part of its formation deliverables, while LegalZoom concentrates more on guided document preparation for formation and supporting organization documents.

Tools reviewed

Primary sources checked during evaluation.

Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.

How to Choose the Right Business Startup

We see the biggest differences in business startup workflows come from how data and approvals stay connected over time. Prioritize the criteria labeled audit log because it shows who changed what in your startup finance records, not just what the tool can do in a demo.

Audit log for finance changes

Why it matters

A clear audit log for finance changes matters when your business startup numbers get reviewed by owners, accountants, or banks. It also helps you explain discrepancies after changes happen.

How to check

In the demo, make a small edit (like adjusting a transaction date or category) and then open the audit trail screen. Confirm it records the field changed, the timestamp, and the user who made the change.

Chart of accounts that matches your setup

Why it matters

Chart of accounts that matches your setup reduces cleanup work as your business startup adds invoices, expenses, and revenue streams. It also controls how consistently reports reflect your reality.

How to check

Ask for a sample chart of accounts used for a startup-style revenue and expense mix. Then try creating one custom income and one expense account, and verify you can map transactions to them without breaking reporting.

Bank feed and reconciliation workflow

Why it matters

For a business startup, reconciliation quality affects whether monthly numbers close cleanly. A usable reconciliation flow also shortens the time between transactions and accurate reports.

How to check

Look for a screen that matches imported bank lines to existing transactions. Trigger an automatic match, then show how you handle exceptions and finalize a statement close.

Invoice status to cash visibility

Why it matters

Invoice status to cash visibility matters because business startup reporting is often delayed until revenue shows up correctly. You want the same invoice lifecycle to drive both collection views and revenue totals.

How to check

Import or create a sample invoice, then track it through statuses like sent, partially paid, and paid. Check whether the reporting screens reflect those statuses without manual rework.

Roles, RBAC, and review controls

Why it matters

Roles, RBAC, and review controls help your business startup separate day-to-day entry from finance review. It lowers the risk of posting mistakes without relying on memory or emails.

How to check

During a demo, request two test users (one can edit, one can review). Verify you can assign permissions, attempt a blocked action, and confirm the reviewer can approve or unlock changes as documented.

Red flags

  • Audit trails that only log events without field-level details
  • Accounts that require rebuilding reports after adding categories
  • Reconciliation that leaves transactions in an unclear matched or posted state

Fit by situation

  • If you expect monthly close to be reviewed by others, prioritize audit log for finance changes.
  • If your startup revenue or expenses will shift every quarter, prioritize chart of accounts that matches your setup.
  • If you rely on bank imports and invoice payments to report progress weekly, prioritize bank feed and reconciliation workflow.
Commissioned Research

Funding and competing interests

This study was co-funded by several of the vendors assessed in it. No single vendor funded it. Funders could propose the market studied.

They had no role in selecting vendors, setting or weighting criteria, analysing data or drawing conclusions, and they received the same factual-accuracy check as every other vendor assessed.

Market definition, inclusion rules and criteria weights were fixed by an editor before research began and did not change afterwards. Editorial process →

Keep exploring

FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS

Not on this list? Let’s fix that.

Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.

Apply for a Listing

WHAT THIS INCLUDES

  • Where buyers compare

    Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.

  • Editorial write-up

    We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.

  • On-page brand presence

    You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.

  • Kept up to date

    We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.