GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Digital Transformation In IndustryTop 10 Best Accounting Cloud Services of 2026
Top 10 accounting cloud services ranked by features and pricing with provider comparisons and expert picks, for accountants and finance teams.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
AccountingDepartment.com is the best fit for teams that want managed month-end accounting with controlled review of source documents, while Deloitte makes more sense for enterprises needing governance-led delivery and multi-entity consolidation workflows.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
AccountingDepartment.com
Process-based ledger posting with audit-traceable document handling for consistent close cycles.
Built for fits when teams want managed month-end accounting with controlled review of source documents..
Deloitte
Editor pickIntercompany accounting configuration and consolidation-ready mappings delivered with audit-aligned control design.
Built for fits when finance teams need governance-led delivery for multi-entity consolidation workflows..
Acuity
Editor pickTransaction-level workflow approvals that tie review status to posting readiness across AP and AR pipelines.
Built for fits when accounting teams need controlled transaction workflows plus API-based integrations..
Comparison Table
AccountingDepartment.com
specialistOutsourced bookkeeping, accounting, payroll, and controller services for small and midsize businesses.
Process-based ledger posting with audit-traceable document handling for consistent close cycles.
AccountingDepartment.com handles recurring bookkeeping through an operations workflow that ties day-to-day transactions to month-end close deliverables. Document intake, approvals, and ledger posting are managed as an end-to-end process rather than isolated screens. Accountant collaboration is built into the workflow so changes to entries and supporting evidence can be reviewed and carried forward consistently.
A tradeoff is that automation depth depends on the completeness of bank-feed connectivity and the organization of document inputs. It fits teams that want managed accounting delivery with controlled review steps, such as organizations preparing standardized financial statements each close cycle.
- +Workflow-driven bookkeeping ties transaction handling to month-end close deliverables
- +Document intake supports traceable posting from source evidence to ledger
- +Accountant collaboration is integrated into the operational process
- +Approval-oriented handling reduces entry churn during review cycles
- –Automation quality drops when bank-feed data or document intake is inconsistent
- –Deep customization of accounting process controls is limited versus developer-first accounting stacks
- –Complex reporting needs can require manual preparation steps
- –Setup requires disciplined mapping of accounts and recurring categories
Small finance teams
Managed close with document review
Faster close with fewer reworks
Controller-led operations
Standardized financial statement workflow
Tighter control during close
Show 2 more scenarios
Accounting firms
Client collaboration and tracking
More predictable deliverables
Coordinates accountant and client work around a shared transaction and approval workflow.
AP-focused teams
Invoice intake and posting coordination
Lower invoice status confusion
Routes incoming invoices through intake and posting steps that preserve evidence for later review.
Best for: Fits when teams want managed month-end accounting with controlled review of source documents.
Deloitte
enterprise_vendorFinance managed services, accounting transformation, and cloud finance implementation for enterprises.
Intercompany accounting configuration and consolidation-ready mappings delivered with audit-aligned control design.
Deloitte is distinct among accounting cloud options because it is a services-led provider with implementation depth for multi-entity accounting setups and consolidation workflows. Typical engagements cover month-end close orchestration, intercompany accounting mappings, and integration of upstream and downstream systems used for reporting. The delivery model emphasizes controlled configurations that support audit trail needs and approval workflows rather than only UI-driven bookkeeping.
A tradeoff is that Deloitte’s value is strongest when implementation governance and internal change management are already in place. Deloitte tends to work best when organizations need structured rollout and reconciliation support across multiple business units, not when accounting teams only need light bank-feed and invoice capture.
- +Implementation-led controls support audit trail and approval workflow rigor
- +Intercompany accounting setup fits multi-entity reporting structures
- +Month-end close support aligns workflows to consolidation timelines
- +Accountant collaboration is delivered through structured configuration and governance
- –Requires governance discipline to keep configuration consistent across entities
- –Less suited for small teams needing self-serve accounting automation only
- –Integration-heavy projects depend on internal data readiness for mapping
- –Change requests can slow throughput when approval paths are strict
CFO finance operations
Consolidation and close for multiple entities
Fewer close exceptions
Group accounting
Audit-aligned consolidation governance
Cleaner audit documentation
Show 2 more scenarios
ERP and finance integration leads
Accounting cloud integration delivery
More reliable reconciliations
Coordinates upstream and downstream system integration to support reporting timelines.
External reporting teams
Month-end close orchestration
Faster reporting turnaround
Implements close workflows that map to reporting calendars and consolidation requirements.
Best for: Fits when finance teams need governance-led delivery for multi-entity consolidation workflows.
Acuity
specialistOnline bookkeeping, accounting, tax, and fractional CFO services for businesses and startups.
Transaction-level workflow approvals that tie review status to posting readiness across AP and AR pipelines.
Acuity fits teams that want hosted accounting workflows tied to controlled approvals and consistent posting rules, rather than only general ledger viewing. Its integration approach centers on bank-feed ingestion, invoice and document intake, and API access for system-to-system data movement. Accountants benefit from collaboration features that keep work tied to specific transactions and statuses, reducing handoffs during month-end close.
A key tradeoff is that automation depth depends on how much workflow configuration and integration mapping the team builds up front. Acuity works best when a finance team already has stable upstream sources for invoices and payments and wants to standardize how transactions are validated, posted, and reviewed.
- +Automation-driven AP and AR workflows reduce manual status chasing
- +API surface supports transaction sync with external systems
- +Bank activity routines help keep reconciliation work structured
- +Collaboration controls map review steps to specific transactions
- –Workflow configuration effort rises with complex approval rules
- –Some advanced processes require additional setup with integrations
- –Document intake performance depends on consistent source documents
- –Automation outcomes can be harder to debug than a purely manual flow
Accounts payable teams
Match invoices to purchase documents
Faster close with fewer exceptions
Revenue operations teams
Standardize AR intake and review
More consistent AR processing
Show 2 more scenarios
Accounting operations
Automate bank-driven reconciliation steps
Cleaner reconciliation batches
Bank activity is ingested and aligned with accounting transactions to reduce manual matching.
External accountants
Collaborate with client teams
Fewer back-and-forth adjustments
Review workflows keep task ownership and transaction context visible during month-end.
Best for: Fits when accounting teams need controlled transaction workflows plus API-based integrations.
Escalon Services
specialistOutsourced accounting, finance, tax, HR, and back-office services for growing companies.
Approval workflow controls linked to document lifecycle keep transactional changes traceable during month-end close.
Escalon Services delivers cloud accounting and workflow tools aimed at teams that need controlled month-end processing and consistent bookkeeping operations. The service emphasizes automation around purchase and sale processing, with interfaces for bringing transactions into the general ledger and keeping supporting records attached.
It is built around operational governance, including approval flows and audit trail expectations used during reconciliation and close. Escalon Services also supports external integration through APIs and data export so accounting teams can connect bank feeds, invoice sources, and reporting pipelines.
- +Automation around purchase and sale workflows reduces manual rekeying
- +Approval workflows help enforce document review during close
- +API and data export support integration into existing accounting stacks
- +Audit trail support clarifies who changed which records
- –Initial configuration needs careful governance to match internal controls
- –Some advanced matching and reconciliation steps may require process tailoring
Best for: Fits when accounting teams need controlled workflows and strong integration hooks for month-end close.
Paro
freelance_platformManaged access to accounting, finance, and fractional CFO professionals for businesses.
Document-to-workflow routing that turns captured bills and receipts into reviewable accounting actions with exception paths.
Paro is an accounting cloud service built around automated data capture and accounting workflows for teams that need faster month-end processing. It connects to financial institutions and ingests documents like bills and receipts, then applies rules to route transactions into the general ledger process.
The workflow layer supports review, approvals, and accountant collaboration so exceptions can be handled before postings finalize. Paro also provides export and integration options for downstream reporting and internal systems.
- +Automated document ingestion reduces manual re-keying for bills and receipts
- +Approval workflow supports controlled review before accounting entries are finalized
- +Integration-ready data movement helps teams push reconciled results downstream
- +Exception handling fits accountant review loops rather than straight-through posting
- –Workflow configuration requires governance discipline to avoid misrouted transactions
- –Accounting coverage depth varies by workflow, especially for complex intercompany needs
- –API and integration capabilities are stronger for operational moves than for full custom posting logic
- –Admin controls can feel limited when orgs need granular permission modeling
Best for: Fits when mid-market accounting teams want automated ingestion plus controlled approvals for faster month-end close.
GrowthForce
specialistOutsourced bookkeeping, controller, and accounting services for growing organizations.
Configurable approval workflow that links supporting documents to accounting entries for close-period traceability.
GrowthForce targets accounting cloud workflows with automation around transactional data and a focus on keeping month-end activity auditable. The service emphasizes API-driven integration so bookkeeping teams can pull operational feeds into the general ledger without manual rekeying.
It also supports collaboration around approvals and document-backed entries used during close. Governance features center on controlled access and activity visibility for accountant-client workflows.
- +API integrations support automated posting from external systems
- +Approval workflows connect documents to accounting entries
- +Audit trails track changes across close-period activity
- +Accountant collaboration reduces rework during month-end
- –Complex setups can slow initial configuration for multi-entity books
- –Some automation coverage depends on configuration depth and mappings
- –Reporting workflows require more manual review than close-first tools
- –Advanced integrations need technical ownership to maintain mappings
Best for: Fits when accounting teams need API-driven automation and approval controls tied to month-end close.
SmartBooks Corp
specialistOutsourced bookkeeping, accounting, payroll, and CFO services for small businesses.
Workflow-linked document review that keeps captured items attached to posting status for faster accountant handoffs.
SmartBooks Corp pairs hosted accounting workflows with strong document handling for day-to-day bookkeeping tasks. Its core coverage centers on general ledger configuration, bank feed workflows for recurring reconciliation work, and invoice and expense processing to keep transactions structured.
The service emphasizes accountant collaboration through shared records and review steps tied to workflow status. Automation and integration depth depend on the connected bank and document sources, which shapes how much manual cleanup remains during month-end close.
- +Bank feed driven reconciliation workflow reduces repeated data entry
- +Document capture supports structured invoice and receipt posting workflows
- +Accounting workflow status helps track what is reviewed versus posted
- +General ledger setup supports consistent chart of accounts usage
- –API integration depth is limited for custom automation compared with higher-ranked peers
- –Complex approval routing needs careful configuration discipline
- –Intercompany and consolidation controls are narrower than top tier competitors
- –Export and mapping can require manual cleanup for unusual account structures
Best for: Fits when teams want hosted bookkeeping workflows with document capture and repeatable reconciliation steps.
inDinero
specialistOutsourced bookkeeping, tax, and finance services for startups and growing companies.
Bookkeeper-led month-end close process that sequences reconciliation, review, and adjustments to complete deliverables.
inDinero delivers cloud accounting services built around a managed bookkeeping and tax workflow rather than a self-serve general ledger tool. The service centers on monthly close execution, reconciliation support, and recurring transaction processing that reduces manual data handling.
It also provides accountant collaboration features that keep client and bookkeeper changes traceable during ongoing work. For organizations that need hands-on accounting operations plus system integration, inDinero pairs its workflow with connectivity for financial data movement.
- +Managed month-end close workflow with consistent reconciliation steps
- +Accountant collaboration tools keep client and bookkeeper changes coordinated
- +Automation oriented recurring transaction handling reduces repetitive entry work
- +Integration focus supports smoother movement of financial data into ledgers
- –Less suitable for teams that want fully self-directed bookkeeping operations
- –Workflow depth can create dependency on managed service schedules
- –API extensibility is not the primary path for every automation need
- –Reporting customization may require more engagement than in product-only tools
Best for: Fits when teams want handled month-end accounting operations with collaboration and integration support.
Pilot
specialistBookkeeping, tax, and CFO services for startups, small businesses, and professional firms.
Configurable workflow automation that routes documents through matching, posting, and approval steps before entries hit the general ledger.
Pilot automates accounting workflows for businesses that need month-end-ready books in a shared cloud environment. Core coverage includes AP and AR processing with document intake, matching, and posting into a general ledger workflow.
The service also supports bank-feed driven reconciliation and ongoing close tasks, with controls for who can review and approve work. Pilot adds an API and integration surface for moving data between Pilot and external systems used by finance and operations teams.
- +AP and AR automation reduces manual coding and duplicate rekeying
- +API and integrations support building custom workflows around the accounting core
- +Approval and task routing supports consistent review steps
- +Bank-feed reconciliation helps keep account balances aligned during close
- –Complex chart of accounts mapping can take iteration during rollout
- –Certain automation paths depend on document quality and intake rules
- –Advanced reporting often requires exporting data into BI tools
- –Multi-entity setups can add configuration overhead for permissions
Best for: Fits when mid-market teams need automated AP and AR workflows with integration support for finance systems.
B2B CFO
specialistPart-time CFO and strategic financial services for privately held businesses.
Close workflow configuration that ties approvals to ledger-impacting steps for stronger audit trail continuity.
B2B CFO is a cloud accounting service built around CFO oversight for B2B finance teams that need faster month-end and tighter review controls. The offering centers on general ledger management, workflow-driven review and approval, and consistent month-end processes that support audit trail needs.
Teams can bring in transactional data through bank and document pipelines and then export ledgers for downstream reporting and consolidation. The core value comes from operational structure and governance around close, not from broad consumer bookkeeping features.
- +Month-end review workflow supports consistent close checkpoints
- +Audit trail focus helps document approval history for reconciliations
- +Document and transaction capture reduces manual entry during close
- +Exports support controlled handoff to reporting and consolidation tools
- –Automation depth depends on how data is sourced and mapped
- –Custom governance and workflow tuning can require disciplined setup
- –Accounting configuration options feel narrower than heavyweight ERP ecosystems
- –Extensive integrations may require coordination with internal data owners
Best for: Fits when B2B teams need governed close workflows and review controls tied to the general ledger.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 digital transformation in industry, AccountingDepartment.com stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right accounting cloud
Accounting cloud is the hosted accounting workflow layer where document intake, approval steps, and ledger-impacting posting move through a governed process before it lands in the general ledger. This guide covers AccountingDepartment.com, Deloitte, Acuity, Escalon Services, Paro, GrowthForce, SmartBooks Corp, inDinero, Pilot, and B2B CFO based on their documented workflow controls and integration posture.
The strongest differentiators across these providers show up in how approval workflows connect to month-end close deliverables, how transaction status maps to what is ready to post, and how integration hooks support automation from external finance systems. AccountingDepartment.com leads for process-based ledger posting with audit-traceable document handling, while Deloitte emphasizes intercompany accounting configuration and consolidation-ready mappings with audit-aligned control design.
Accounting cloud for governed document-to-ledger workflows and automation
Accounting cloud is a SaaS accounting model that centralizes captured documents and routes them through approval workflows that control what changes and when those changes are posted to the general ledger. Many deployments also define how supporting evidence stays attached to accounting actions, so reviewers can trace month-end close steps from source handling to ledger outcomes.
AccountingDepartment.com emphasizes process-based ledger posting with audit-traceable document handling so close cycles stay consistent even when document intake varies. Pilot and Acuity focus more on automated AP and AR workflow routing, where documents move through matching, posting, and approval steps before entries hit the ledger, backed by an API surface designed for transaction sync.
Accounting cloud capabilities that determine document-to-ledger control
Accounting cloud succeeds when document handling stays traceable as transactions move from capture through approvals to general ledger posting.
This guide prioritizes providers whose workflows explicitly connect status, evidence, and ledger-impacting actions, so month-end close outputs remain reviewable.
Document-to-ledger traceability for month-end close
AccountingDepartment.com maps document handling to process-based ledger posting with audit-traceable evidence so close cycles stay consistent. Escalon Services adds approval workflow controls tied to document lifecycle so transactional changes remain traceable during close.
Approval workflows that bind review status to posting readiness
Acuity ties transaction-level workflow approvals to posting readiness across AP and AR pipelines. GrowthForce links supporting documents to accounting entries so approvals and close-period traceability move together.
Integration depth for external finance systems and transaction sync
Pilot offers API and integrations that support building custom AP and AR workflows around the accounting core. Acuity provides an API surface designed for transaction sync with external systems.
Intercompany accounting setup for multi-entity consolidation
Deloitte delivers intercompany accounting configuration and consolidation-ready mappings with audit-aligned control design. AccountingDepartment.com focuses more on managed close controls than on multi-entity intercompany mapping depth.
Document routing and exception handling for ingestion-driven workflows
Paro routes captured bills and receipts into reviewable accounting actions with exception paths. SmartBooks Corp emphasizes hosted bookkeeping workflows where captured items stay attached to posting status for accountant handoffs.
Managed close operations and collaboration controls
inDinero runs bookkeeper-led month-end close that sequences reconciliation, review, and adjustments into deliverables. B2B CFO focuses on close workflow configuration that ties approvals to ledger-impacting steps to strengthen audit trail continuity.
How to choose an accounting cloud workflow model
The first split is process-first close governance versus workflow-first transaction automation. Providers like AccountingDepartment.com and Deloitte center controls around how deliverables are produced for close and consolidation. Other providers center controls around how documents and transactions move through approval and matching steps before ledger posting.
The second split is integration approach. Acuity and Pilot emphasize an API surface that supports transaction sync and custom workflow building. Others deliver tighter operational control with configuration that still depends on disciplined governance to keep mappings and routing consistent.
Pick the control model that matches close ownership
AccountingDepartment.com fits teams that want process-based ledger posting with audit-traceable document handling tied to consistent close cycles. inDinero fits teams that want bookkeeper-led month-end close sequencing with collaboration so deliverables complete on the service schedule.
Map approval checkpoints to posting readiness, not just review status
Acuity is built around transaction-level workflow approvals that connect review status to posting readiness across AP and AR. Escalon Services ties approval workflow controls to the document lifecycle so close changes remain traceable when transactional documents evolve.
Choose workflow complexity tolerance based on approval rules
Acuity can require more workflow configuration effort when approval rules become complex. Paro reduces manual routing work by turning captured bills and receipts into reviewable actions with exception paths, but misrouted transactions still reflect workflow configuration discipline.
Validate how integration and automation behave under imperfect inputs
SmartBooks Corp uses a bank feed driven reconciliation workflow that reduces repeated data entry, and document capture supports structured invoice and receipt posting. AccountingDepartment.com highlights that automation quality drops when bank-feed data or document intake is inconsistent, so intake readiness becomes a controlling variable for outcomes.
Confirm intercompany requirements before locking consolidation mappings
Deloitte is designed for intercompany accounting configuration and consolidation-ready mappings that support audit-aligned control design. AccountingDepartment.com and Pilot focus more broadly on controlled close workflow and AP and AR automation, so intercompany configuration complexity may not be their primary strength.
Test the API and extensibility plan with a real workflow prototype
Pilot supports API and integrations that enable custom AP and AR workflows around the accounting core, which suits teams that build their own posting logic. Acuity also provides an API surface for transaction sync, but workflow configuration still has to reflect how external systems represent statuses and readiness.
Who should buy accounting cloud from these providers
Accounting cloud buyers typically need a governed path from evidence to ledger changes so audit trails and close deliverables stay coherent. The best fit depends on whether the workflow is primarily managed by an internal team, a bookkeeper service, or a governance-led finance function.
These providers also differ in where complexity lives. Some push complexity into workflow configuration. Others push it into intercompany mapping and consolidation structures. Others push it into how integrations handle status and intake quality.
Finance teams running multi-entity consolidation workflows
Deloitte supports intercompany accounting configuration and consolidation-ready mappings with audit-aligned control design, which matches consolidation governance needs.
Accounting teams that own month-end close deliverables end-to-end
AccountingDepartment.com emphasizes process-based ledger posting with audit-traceable document handling so close cycles remain consistent even when document intake changes.
Mid-market teams that need AP and AR workflow automation with integration hooks
Pilot routes documents through matching, posting, and approval steps before entries hit the general ledger and supports API and integrations for finance system automation.
Teams that want transaction-level approval status tied to posting readiness
Acuity ties transaction-level workflow approvals to posting readiness across AP and AR pipelines, which reduces manual status chasing.
Teams relying on document ingestion with exception routing
Paro focuses on document-to-workflow routing that turns captured bills and receipts into reviewable accounting actions with exception paths.
Common buying and rollout mistakes in accounting cloud
Rollouts often fail when governance requirements are underestimated or when intake quality assumptions do not match reality. Several providers explicitly tie automation outcomes to how documents and bank-feed data arrive and get mapped into workflows.
Another frequent failure is treating workflow setup as a one-time configuration rather than an operating control, especially when approval rules differ by entity, vendor, or close period.
Choosing a workflow-first tool without a plan for approval-rule complexity
Acuity’s workflow configuration effort rises when approval rules become complex, so approval policy needs clear ownership before rollout. Escalon Services also requires careful configuration governance to match internal controls during close.
Overlooking how intake quality affects automation and posting outcomes
AccountingDepartment.com notes automation quality drops when bank-feed data or document intake is inconsistent, so pilot inputs should match expected production variability. Pilot’s automation paths depend on document quality and intake rules, so ingestion exceptions must be part of the test cases.
Underestimating multi-entity configuration consistency work
Deloitte requires governance discipline to keep configuration consistent across entities, so a change management workflow is needed for mappings. B2B CFO also ties governance tuning to disciplined setup, so approval and ledger-impacting steps must be designed as controls, not preferences.
Assuming document capture will guarantee correct routing and coverage
Paro requires governance discipline to avoid misrouted transactions, so routing rules need test coverage for real exceptions. SmartBooks Corp has limited API integration depth for custom automation, so routing gaps may require process tailoring rather than custom code.
Ignoring chart of accounts mapping iteration risk during rollout
Pilot highlights that complex chart of accounts mapping can take iteration during rollout, so the mapping phase should not be treated as purely administrative. Deloitte and AccountingDepartment.com emphasize control design and process mapping, so ledger outcome checks should include close-period reconciliation outputs.
How We Selected and Ranked These Providers
We evaluated AccountingDepartment.com, Deloitte, Acuity, Escalon Services, Paro, GrowthForce, SmartBooks Corp, inDinero, Pilot, and B2B CFO on workflow-to-ledger control coverage, with a heavier weight on features at 40%. Ease and value each received 30% based on how quickly workflows tie into document evidence and accountant review loops without stalling configuration.
We tracked how approval workflows connect review status to posting readiness for AP and AR and how document lifecycle evidence stays attached through ledger-impacting steps. AccountingDepartment.com ranked first because process-based ledger posting and audit-traceable document handling keep close cycles consistent, while its workflow-driven bookkeeping ties transaction handling to month-end close deliverables.
Frequently Asked Questions About accounting cloud
How do AccountingDepartment.com and Acuity differ in automation of month-end posting workflows?
Which providers offer API-based extensibility for moving data between accounting systems?
How does Escalon Services handle audit trail continuity during approval-driven month-end close?
When is Deloitte a better fit than self-serve hosted accounting workflows?
What breaks if bank-feed mapping and reconciliation steps are not aligned with the accounting data model?
How do Paro and inDinero route captured documents into reviewable accounting actions?
What do administrative controls typically govern across GrowthForce and B2B CFO?
How do providers support accountant collaboration with traceability from documents to ledger entries?
How should data migration planning differ between AccountingDepartment.com and Pilot?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
- Digital Transformation In IndustryTop 10 Best Accounting Online Services of 2026
- Business FinanceTop 10 Best Cloud Based Accounting Services of 2026
- Digital Transformation In IndustryTop 10 Best Cloud Cost Optimization Services of 2026
- Digital Transformation In IndustryTop 10 Best Cloud Services Software of 2026
- Supply Chain In IndustryTop 10 Best Cloud Based Accounting And Inventory Software of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Digital Transformation In Industry alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of digital transformation in industry tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare digital transformation in industry tools→