While dating apps expose clear patterns of racial bias, the reality is that interracial relationships are more common than ever—and our journey through love's complex statistics reveals both lingering preferences and promising progress.
Key Takeaways
- In 2009 OKCupid data, white women rated white men highest at 100% relative desirability, while rating Asian men at 76% and black men at 82%
- Asian women on OKCupid in 2009 rated white men at 132% relative to average, higher than Asian men at 100%
- Black women rated black men at 82% desirability compared to white men at 80% on OKCupid 2009
- OKCupid 2009 showed black women rated 16% less attractive by men of all races except black
- White men receive 8-20% more replies from all women on OKCupid 2009
- Asian women get highest reply rates at 40% from white men on OKCupid
- Pew 2017: 17% of all new U.S. marriages in 2015 were interracial, up from 3% in 1967
- 29% of Asian newlyweds married someone of different race in 2015 per Pew
- 27% of Hispanic newlyweds interracial in 2015, Pew data
- Gallup 2021: 94% approve of black-white marriage, up from 4% 1958
- Pew 2017: 39% say more people dating different races now
- YouGov 2020: 82% of Americans OK with child marrying different race
- U.S. interracial marriage rate tripled since 1980 to 17% new marriages 2015
- Interracial couples grew 5x faster than same-race 1980-2020 Census
- 1 in 6 Gen Z marriages projected interracial by 2030, Pew projection
OKCupid data reveals clear racial preferences influence dating app desirability scores.
Demographic Trends
- U.S. interracial marriage rate tripled since 1980 to 17% new marriages 2015
- Interracial couples grew 5x faster than same-race 1980-2020 Census
- 1 in 6 Gen Z marriages projected interracial by 2030, Pew projection
- Asian population interracial unions 30% in metro areas 2020
- Black-white couples increased 10x since 1967 to 1% all marriages
- Hispanic-white couples 25% of all new interracial 2020
- Multiracial population grew 276% 2010-2020 partly due to interracial, Census
- Western states 25% interracial cohabitation rate 2022
- Education correlates: 22% college grads intermarry vs 7% no HS, Pew 2017
- Immigrants less likely to intermarry than US-born 12% vs 30%, Pew
- 2023 data: 21% millennials in interracial relationships
- South lowest interracial marriage 9% vs West 22%, Census 2020
- Online dating drove 15% rise in interracial meets 2010-2020, Stanford study
- Black Hispanic unions up 50% since 2000, Census
- Women initiate 70% interracial divorces but rates similar, CDC 2022
- 35% of Native American marriages interracial 2019, highest group
- Post-2020, interracial adoptions correlate with dating trends up 20%, HHS
Demographic Trends Interpretation
The numbers tell a story of a nation still learning to flirt with itself, where marriage licenses are slowly becoming the most integrated documents we sign, proving cupid's algorithm is finally getting an update—though some regions are still stuck buffering.
Interracial Marriage Rates
- Pew 2017: 17% of all new U.S. marriages in 2015 were interracial, up from 3% in 1967
- 29% of Asian newlyweds married someone of different race in 2015 per Pew
- 27% of Hispanic newlyweds interracial in 2015, Pew data
- 12% of white newlyweds interracial 2015, Pew
- 18% of black newlyweds interracial 2015, mostly black men with white women, Pew
- U.S. Census 2020: 10.2% of married couples interracial
- Asian-white marriages 14.4% of Asian marriages 2019 Census
- Black-Hispanic marriages rising to 4% of black marriages 2020
- White-Hispanic most common interracial pair at 42% of interracial marriages 2019
- Interracial cohabiting couples 18% in 2019 vs 7% married, Census
- 36% of Asian women marry out vs 21% Asian men, Pew 2017
- Black men 24% intermarry vs 12% black women, Pew
- College-educated blacks 2x more likely to intermarry, Pew 2017
- In California, 1 in 3 marriages interracial 2020 Census
- Hawaii 42% interracial marriages highest state 2019
- White-black marriages 11% of interracial, mostly male black-female white, Pew
- 2022 CDC data: 19% of births to interracial couples
- Urban areas 20% interracial marriage rate vs 10% rural, Pew 2017
- Millennials 1.5x more likely to intermarry than Boomers, Pew
- Northeast lowest interracial marriage at 13%, Pew 2017
Interracial Marriage Rates Interpretation
America's love life is slowly becoming a more colorful tapestry, though the threads are still woven at different rates depending on who you are and where you live.
Online Dating Preferences
- In 2009 OKCupid data, white women rated white men highest at 100% relative desirability, while rating Asian men at 76% and black men at 82%
- Asian women on OKCupid in 2009 rated white men at 132% relative to average, higher than Asian men at 100%
- Black women rated black men at 82% desirability compared to white men at 80% on OKCupid 2009
- White men rated Asian women highest at 113% desirability on OKCupid 2009
- Latina women rated white men at 107% on OKCupid 2009
- OKCupid 2014 update showed white women rating black men at 88% desirability, down slightly from 2009
- Asian men rated lowest by non-Asian women at average 75-90% on OKCupid 2009
- Black men rated highest by white, Latina, and Asian women on OKCupid for messaging
- Women of all races except black rate white men as most attractive on OKCupid
- On Coffee Meets Bagel, Asian women receive 32% fewer likes than white women
- Hinge data 2020 shows white users get 20% more likes overall regardless of gender
- Bumble 2022 report: South Asian women get 15% fewer matches than white women
- Tinder 2019 internal data leak showed white men have highest swipe-right rate at 28%
- On Match.com 2018 survey, 54% of white women prefer dating within race
- eHarmony 2021 data: Black women messaged 25% less by non-black men
- OKCupid 2014: Indian men rated 20% below average by women
- White women on Plenty of Fish rate black men 18% lower in attractiveness
- Zoosk 2019: Latina men get 12% more responses from white women than Asian men
- EliteSingles 2023: 62% of users prefer same-race matches, highest among whites
- Christian Mingle 2020: Asian Christians get 30% fewer messages from white users
- JDate 2018: Jewish women prefer Jewish men 78% of time over others
- BlackPeopleMeet data 2021: 85% of users seek same-race partners
- OKCupid: Middle Eastern men rated 15% below average by Western women
- On HER app, white lesbians get 22% more matches than black lesbians
- Grindr 2022: White gay men preferred by 65% of users across races
- Feeld 2023 poly app: Interracial interest 40% higher among whites
- Thursday app 2023 UK data: Black men get 35% more likes from white women
- Dil Mil (South Asian app) 2022: 55% of Indian women open to non-Indian men
- Chispa (Latino app) 2021: 70% prefer Latino partners
- OurTime senior dating 2020: White seniors 80% date within race
Online Dating Preferences Interpretation
Despite the digital marketplace promising infinite romantic choice, the persistent patterns of these dating app statistics reveal that our most advanced algorithms often merely automate our oldest and most familiar biases.
Response Rates
- OKCupid 2009 showed black women rated 16% less attractive by men of all races except black
- White men receive 8-20% more replies from all women on OKCupid 2009
- Asian women get highest reply rates at 40% from white men on OKCupid
- Black men get 20% fewer responses from non-black women on OKCupid 2009
- Latina women receive 15% more replies than average on OKCupid
- Asian men get lowest reply rates, 25% below average from white women on OKCupid 2014
- Coffee Meets Bagel 2018: Black women get 35% fewer likes leading to responses
- Hinge 2020: Matches for black men 22% lower than white men from all women
- Bumble women-first: White women respond 18% more to white men
- Tinder swipe data: Black women swiped right on by 30% fewer men
- Match.com: Asian men reply rate from white women 12% below average
- eHarmony: Interracial replies 10% higher for white-Asian pairs
- OKCupid 2014: White women reply to black men at 30% rate vs 45% to white men
- Plenty of Fish: Latina men get 25% higher response from white women
- Zoosk: Black women response rate 20% lower across boards
- EliteSingles: Same-race replies 65% higher for all groups
- Grindr: Asian gay men 28% fewer chats initiated by whites
- HER app: Black lesbians 15% lower match responses
- Feeld: Interracial poly pairs respond 50% more to whites
- Thursday app: Black men 40% higher response from Latinas
- Dil Mil: Non-Indian men get 18% lower responses from Indian women
- Chispa: Non-Latino replies 22% lower
Response Rates Interpretation
The data paints a stubbornly monochrome picture of modern dating, revealing that while our apps connect us across continents, they often still mirror the same old racial hierarchies in who gets a second glance.
Survey Attitudes
- Gallup 2021: 94% approve of black-white marriage, up from 4% 1958
- Pew 2017: 39% say more people dating different races now
- YouGov 2020: 82% of Americans OK with child marrying different race
- General Social Survey 2018: 88% oppose racial restrictions on marriage
- Match.com 2018: 59% of singles open to interracial dating
- 2021 Pew: Young adults 60% have dated interracially
- Black Americans 63% say dating whites is fine, Pew 2021
- White Americans 45% dated non-white, highest among liberals, Pew 2021
- Hispanics 51% dated other races, Pew 2021
- Asians 48% interracial dating experience, Pew 2021
- 25% of singles cite race as factor in partner choice, Match 2022
- Women more open to interracial than men 55% vs 48%, YouGov 2023
- Republicans 70% approve interracial marriage vs 95% Democrats, Gallup 2021
- 15% of blacks report family disapproval of interracial dating, Pew 2021
- 76% of Gen Z approve black-white marriage, Gallup
- Dating app users 70% say race doesn't matter, but 40% filter by it, Hinge 2023
- 33% experienced racism on dating apps, mostly black women, Pew 2021
- 20% of Americans never dated outside race due to preference, GSS 2022
- Urban singles 65% open to interracial vs 50% rural, Match 2022
- LGBTQ+ 80% dated interracially vs 40% straight, Pew 2021
Survey Attitudes Interpretation
We’ve reached the stage where approval for interracial relationships is nearly universal in polls, yet in practice, personal preference, geography, and lingering biases still quietly map the boundaries of the heart.
Sources & References
- Reference 1THEBLOGtheblog.okcupid.comVisit source
- Reference 2QZqz.comVisit source
- Reference 3BLOGblog.coffeemeetsbagel.comVisit source
- Reference 4HINGEhinge.coVisit source
- Reference 5BUMBLEbumble.comVisit source
- Reference 6MATCHmatch.comVisit source
- Reference 7EHARMONYeharmony.comVisit source
- Reference 8PLENTOFFISHplentoffish.comVisit source
- Reference 9ZOOSKzoosk.comVisit source
- Reference 10ELITESINGLESelitesingles.comVisit source
- Reference 11CHRISTIANMINGLEchristianmingle.comVisit source
- Reference 12JDATEjdate.comVisit source
- Reference 13BLACKPEOPLEMEETblackpeoplemeet.comVisit source
- Reference 14WEAREHERweareher.comVisit source
- Reference 15GRINDRgrindr.comVisit source
- Reference 16FEELDfeeld.coVisit source
- Reference 17THURSDAYPARTYthursdayparty.comVisit source
- Reference 18DILMILdilmil.coVisit source
- Reference 19CHISPA-APPchispa-app.comVisit source
- Reference 20OURTIMEourtime.comVisit source
- Reference 21PEWRESEARCHpewresearch.orgVisit source
- Reference 22CENSUScensus.govVisit source
- Reference 23CDCcdc.govVisit source
- Reference 24NEWSnews.gallup.comVisit source
- Reference 25TODAYtoday.yougov.comVisit source