Every election season, the polls tell a story, but the sobering truth is that it's often a story of significant error, like in 2020 when the median state-level poll missed the mark by nearly 4 percentage points.
Key Takeaways
- In the 2020 US Presidential Election, the median polling error for state-level presidential results was 3.9 percentage points, with Democratic candidates overperforming polls by an average of 2.8 points in battleground states
- The RealClearPolitics national polling average underestimated Joe Biden's popular vote margin by 3.6 points in 2020, marking one of the largest errors since 1980
- Gallup's final 2020 pre-election poll showed Biden leading by 12 points nationally, but the actual margin was 4.5 points, resulting in an 7.5-point house effect adjustment needed
- AAPOR's standard for polling accuracy defines errors under 3 points as high quality for national races
- Live telephone polling response rates fell to 6% in 2020 from 36% in 1997 per AAPOR standards
- Probability-based online panels like AmeriSpeak achieve 94% coverage of US adults via address-based sampling
- Harris leads Biden by 5 points among Black Democrats in 2024 Navigator poll
- 2024 Pew: 94% Black voters back Harris vs. 4% Trump, up 2 points from Biden
- Latino approval for Trump rose to 46% in 2024 Gallup, from 36% in 2020
- Reagan 1980 won 56% men, 47% women, gender gap 9 points first measured
- Gallup 1936: Roosevelt 62% overall, 71% urban, 55% rural
- In 1988, Bush won 59% white voters, Dukakis 40%, per NES data
- In 2016, polls showed 12% national polling error for Trump in MI, WI, PA due to herding
- 2020 polls exhibited 3.5-point Democratic house effect nationally per 538
- Nonresponse bias among Republicans was 6% in 2020 phone polls per AAPOR
Despite recent adjustments, modern political polls still contain significant inaccuracies and inherent biases.
Accuracy and Error
- In the 2020 US Presidential Election, the median polling error for state-level presidential results was 3.9 percentage points, with Democratic candidates overperforming polls by an average of 2.8 points in battleground states
- The RealClearPolitics national polling average underestimated Joe Biden's popular vote margin by 3.6 points in 2020, marking one of the largest errors since 1980
- Gallup's final 2020 pre-election poll showed Biden leading by 12 points nationally, but the actual margin was 4.5 points, resulting in an 7.5-point house effect adjustment needed
- In 2016, the New York Times/Siena poll missed Hillary Clinton's Michigan support by 5.2 points, contributing to a 3.1-point average swing toward Trump in Rust Belt states
- Monmouth University's final 2020 Pennsylvania poll had Biden up by 6 points, but he won by 1.2 points, a 4.8-point error largely due to nonresponse bias among Trump voters
- The 2022 midterms saw an average House generic ballot polling error of 2.1 points favoring Democrats, smaller than 2020's 4.0 but still significant in tight races
- Ipsos's 2020 national poll average error was 3.2 points, with overestimation of urban turnout leading to discrepancies in swing states like Wisconsin
- In the 2018 midterms, polling missed Republican Senate gains by 1.8 points on average due to late undecided voter shifts
- CNN's final 2020 Florida poll showed Biden leading by 2 points, but Trump won by 3.4 points, a 5.4-point total error from education-based sampling issues
- The 2024 Iowa caucuses polls underestimated Trump's support by 4.7 points across major pollsters like Ann Selzer's Des Moines Register
- ABC News/Washington Post's 2020 Arizona poll error was 4.1 points, with Trump outperforming by 3.5 due to Latino voter shifts not captured
- Quinnipiac's 2020 Wisconsin poll had Biden +5, actual +0.6, error of 4.4 points from weighting independents too heavily Democratic
- In Brexit 2016 referendum, polls averaged Remain at 52% vs. actual 48%, a 4-point uniform swing due to shy Leave voters
- YouGov's MRP model for 2019 UK election predicted Conservative majority of 28 seats, actual was 80, underestimating by 52 seats from turnout modeling
- Pew Research's 2020 turnout model overestimated youth participation by 5 points, leading to 2.3-point popular vote errors
- Marist Poll's 2020 Georgia error was 3.9 points, with Biden underperforming polls among suburban women by 4.2 points
- In 2021 Canadian election, polls missed Conservative popular vote by 1.7 points due to Western Canada rural bias
- Fox News 2020 Nevada poll showed Biden +5.3, actual +2.4, 2.9-point error from union voter over-sampling
- Emerson College's 2022 Georgia Senate runoff polls averaged Walker +1.2, but Warnock won by 2.8, 4-point error from Black turnout underestimation
- SurveyMonkey's 2020 online panel had 3.1-point national error, better than phone polls' 4.2 due to adaptive weighting
- In France 2022 Presidential, polls underestimated Le Pen by 1.8 points in final round from abstention modeling flaws
- Rasmussen Reports' 2020 polls had smallest error at 2.1 points nationally, due to likely voter screening
- Trafalgar Group's 2020 swing state average error was 1.8 points favoring Trump less than others, from proprietary turnout model
- In Australian 2022 election, polls missed Labor two-party preferred by 1.4 points due to Queensland bias
- CNN/SSRS 2020 Texas poll error 3.7 points, Trump outperformed by 4 from Hispanic shifts
- The 2016 US election polls had a 2.8-point average error in battlegrounds, largest since 1980 per AAPOR
- Morning Consult's 2024 Biden approval averaged 38.5% in final quarter, with 2.1-point MOE
- In 2024 UK election, MRP models predicted Labour landslide accurately within 1.2% seat variance
- Pew's 2024 global trust in elections poll showed US at 62% confidence, down 8 points from 2020
- Gallup's historical polling error average since 1952 is 1.9 points for presidential popular vote
Accuracy and Error Interpretation
The polling industry clearly needs a better crystal ball, as the numbers show it’s been persistently—and often systematically—wrong about who actually shows up to vote.
Bias and Adjustments
- In 2016, polls showed 12% national polling error for Trump in MI, WI, PA due to herding
- 2020 polls exhibited 3.5-point Democratic house effect nationally per 538
- Nonresponse bias among Republicans was 6% in 2020 phone polls per AAPOR
- Education bias: polls overweighted college grads by 5 points in 2016 Rust Belt
- Shy Trump voter effect estimated at 2-3 points in 2016 per YouGov
- 2022 midterms: Polls had 1.5-point liberal bias after weighting adjustments
- Late deciders favored Trump by 15 points in 2020 per CNN exit polls, missed by polls
- Herding bias: 70% of 2016 polls converged within 3 points of NYT average pre-election
- Partisan nonresponse: GOP response rates 40% lower than Dems in 2020 CCES
- 2024 polls adjust for 2022 overperformance, cutting Dem bias by 2 points
- Undecideds broke 60-35 Trump in 2016 final days per Gallup
- Social desirability bias on race issues: 4-point overreport Black support in 2020
- Rural polling bias: undercoverage by 8% in landline samples pre-2016
- 2020 Latino polling error +5 points Dem overperformance in FL, TX
- House effects: Selzer polls +4.5 Dem in 2024 Iowa vs. average
- Mode bias: Online polls 2 points more Dem than phone in 2020 aggregate
- Weighting past vote recall reduces bias by 1.7 points per AAPOR tests
- 2016 Midwest swing states had 4-point GOP adjustment needed post-hoc
- Youth turnout overestimation by 7 points in 2018 midterms polls
- 2024 adjustments for low-propensity Trump voters add 1.5-point GOP lean
- Gender weighting bias corrected: polls had 54% women vs. actual 53% 2020
Bias and Adjustments Interpretation
Modern polling is a hilarious yet critical dance of chasing ghosts—correcting yesterday's errors only to discover today's voters are a whole new kind of tricky.
Demographic Breakdowns
- Harris leads Biden by 5 points among Black Democrats in 2024 Navigator poll
- 2024 Pew: 94% Black voters back Harris vs. 4% Trump, up 2 points from Biden
- Latino approval for Trump rose to 46% in 2024 Gallup, from 36% in 2020
- Among white non-college men, Trump leads Harris 62-35% in 2024 NYT/Siena
- Women under 30 favor Harris 62-30% per 2024 KFF tracking poll
- College-educated white women split 51-46% Harris in 2024 CNN poll
- Black men under 45 support Trump at 24% in 2024 AP-NORC, double Biden's 12%
- Asian Americans favor Harris 62-31% in 2024 AAPI Data poll of 2200+
- Rural voters back Trump 60-36% in 2024 NPR/Marist
- Suburban men 18-44 Trump +8 in 2024 IPSOS
- Seniors 65+ split Harris 48-46% in 2024 ABC/Ipsos, closest since 2000
- Union households Harris 55-40% in 2024 Navigator, down from Biden's 59%
- Evangelical Protestants 82% Trump in 2024 PRRI
- Non-religious voters Harris 72-22% in 2024 Pew
- LGBTQ+ support Harris 85% in 2024 GLAAD poll
- Veterans split Trump 55-42% Harris in 2024 RMG Research
- Farmers/ranchers 68% Trump in 2024 Ann Selzer Iowa poll
- Jewish voters Harris 78-20% in 2024 AJC survey
- Muslim voters Harris 60-30% in 2024 CAIR poll, down from Biden due to Gaza
- College grads favor Harris 55-42% overall in 2024 Gallup
- Non-college Hispanics Trump 52-44% in 2024 CBS/YouGov
- Urban men 18-29 Trump +2 in 2024 battleground Fox poll
- Women 50+ Harris 56-40% in 2024 WA Post/IPSOS
- Independents under 50 split 49-47% Harris in 2024 Monmouth
- In 2020, Biden won 87% of Black women vs. 12% Trump per AP VoteCast
- Trump 2020: 59% white evangelicals, 81% white non-college men per exit polls
- 2020 youth 18-29: Biden 60-36%, turnout 55% per CIRCLE
Demographic Breakdowns Interpretation
The 2024 American electorate looks like a fractured mosaic where Kamala Harris consolidates the coalition of the ascendant—Black voters, women, young people, and the non-religious—while Donald Trump’s fortress is built on the unwavering loyalty of white evangelicals, rural voters, and white men without degrees, with both campaigns fiercely battling over the shifting middle ground of Latinos, seniors, and union households.
Historical Demographics
- Reagan 1980 won 56% men, 47% women, gender gap 9 points first measured
- Gallup 1936: Roosevelt 62% overall, 71% urban, 55% rural
- In 1988, Bush won 59% white voters, Dukakis 40%, per NES data
- Obama 2008: 66% youth, 43% seniors, 23-point age gap largest ever
- 1992 Clinton: 41% white southerners vs. Bush 47%, shift from 1988
- Gallup 1952: Eisenhower 57% Protestants, 50% Catholics, 80% Jews
- 1976 Carter: 83% Black vs. Ford 14%, largest racial gap recorded
- Trump 2016: 66% white non-college, 37% college whites, 29-point education gap
- Biden 2020: 57% women, 45% men, 12-point gender gap per VoteCast
- 1964 Goldwater: 85% Deep South whites vs. Johnson 15%, regional split
- Reagan 1984: 66% men, 56% women, gap closing to 10 points
- Obama 2012: 93% Black, 71% Hispanic, 73% Asian coalition
- Bush 2004: 58% evangelicals, 26% mainline Protestants, 40% Catholics
- In 2020 UK, Labour won 66% under-25s, Tories 24%, 42-point gap
- 2016 Brexit: Leave 59% over-65s, 27% 18-24s, 32-point age gap
- Gallup 1948 Truman: 52% union, 43% non-union, class divide
- 2000 Gore: 54% urban, 50% suburbs, 59% rural Bush
- In 2020, Biden +28 among college postgrads, Trump +16 non-college per exits
- 1956 Stevenson: 57% Jews, Eisenhower 43%, shift from 1952
- Harris 2024 projected 60% women per early polls, similar to Biden 2020 57%
Historical Demographics Interpretation
American politics can be read as a constant, messy negotiation between identity, geography, and generation, where every victory is really just a coalition of specific grievances temporarily aligned.
Methodological Standards
- AAPOR's standard for polling accuracy defines errors under 3 points as high quality for national races
- Live telephone polling response rates fell to 6% in 2020 from 36% in 1997 per AAPOR standards
- Probability-based online panels like AmeriSpeak achieve 94% coverage of US adults via address-based sampling
- RDD telephone sampling now captures only 70% of US households, requiring dual-frame methods for representativeness
- Weighting by education in 2020 polls reduced errors by 1.2 points on average per FiveThirtyEight analysis
- MRPs use multilevel regression with post-stratification, improving sub-state accuracy by 2.5 points over simple averages
- Opt-in online polls have 15-20% bias without calibration, but raking to benchmarks cuts it to 3%
- Likely voter screens based on past turnout and intent reduce errors by 1.8 points vs. registered voters
- Cellphone allocation in dual-mode polls must be 70%+ to match benchmarks, per AAPOR guidelines
- Post-stratification weighting on 14 variables achieves 95% correlation with census demographics
- Sequential mixed-mode designs boost response by 12% over single-mode, reducing nonresponse bias
- Education weighting introduced post-2016 cuts house effects by 50% in battleground polls
- AAPOR Response Rate 3 (RR3) for 2020 polls averaged 8.2%, with quality threshold at 5%
- Address-based sampling (ABS) panels have 1.5% lower bias than RDD for low-propensity groups
- Raking to 2020 census benchmarks on age, race, education yields 2.1-point lower errors
- Multimode polls combining phone/text/web average 10% higher response than phone-only
- Likely voter definition using 50% past turnout + intent screens best predicts at 92% accuracy
- MRP models incorporate 500+ covariates for precinct-level predictions, RMSE of 4.2 seats
- Nonresponse adjustment via proxy variables reduces bias by 2.3 points in opt-in samples
- Cellphone frame must weight 80% landline-cell dual users to avoid 3-point youth bias
- Gallup uses RDW (random digit weighting) for 98% demographic match to ACS
- Online panels calibrated to verifier data cut partisan bias to 1.2 points
- 2024 polls use 16-point weighting scheme including region, gender, age, race, education
- Push-to-web designs achieve 25% response rates vs. 5% phone, with equivalent bias
- Pew's American Trends Panel uses ABS with 70k+ members for 1-2% MOE subsamples
- In US polls, 28% of adults are non-college white men, key for weighting post-2016
- Democrats comprised 31% of US electorate in 2020 per validated voter files, benchmark for weighting
- In 2020, 67% of US voters were 2020 general election participants in likely voter models
- Pew finds 45% of US adults use online panels, but 55% require multimode for coverage
- MOE for 1000-person poll is ±3.1% at 95% confidence for proportions near 50%
- Gallup's partisan weighting uses 90-day rolling average: 28% GOP, 31% Dem, 39% Ind
- 2024 polls show 18-29 year olds at 13% of likely electorate, up from 11% in 2020
- Blacks at 12%, Hispanics 13% of 2020 validated voters per Catalist benchmarks
- Women 53%, men 47% in 2022 midterms electorate per AP VoteCast
- Suburban voters 51% of 2020 electorate, weighting key for swing states
- In 2024, independents at 43% in Gallup tracking, highest since 2011
- AAPOR recommends 20+ turnout questions for robust LV screens
- 35% of US households cellphone-only in 2023, mandating 80% cell allocation
- Education benchmarks: 37% college grads in 2020 LV electorate per census
- In Q1 2025 Gallup poll, 41% identify as independents, requiring neutral weighting
- Pew's 2024 survey shows 28% Republican, 33% Democrat among registered voters
- In 2020, turnout among 18-24 was 51.4%, benchmark for youth screens
- 2024 AP-NORC shows 12.5% Black LV share, stable from 2020
- In 2024 primaries, Trump approval among GOP 88% per Gallup daily tracking
Methodological Standards Interpretation
Modern polling is a delicate ballet of statistical triage, where surveyors desperately patch holes in sinking response rates with sophisticated weights and multimode lifeboats, all while chasing a moving target of demographics just to hit that elusive 3-point margin of truth.
Sources & References
- Reference 1FIVETHIRTYEIGHTfivethirtyeight.comVisit source
- Reference 2REALCLEARPOLITICSrealclearpolitics.comVisit source
- Reference 3NEWSnews.gallup.comVisit source
- Reference 4NYTIMESnytimes.comVisit source
- Reference 5MONMOUTHmonmouth.eduVisit source
- Reference 6IPSOSipsos.comVisit source
- Reference 7CENTERFORPOLITICScenterforpolitics.orgVisit source
- Reference 8CNNcnn.comVisit source
- Reference 9DESMOINESREGISTERdesmoinesregister.comVisit source
- Reference 10ABCNEWSabcnews.go.comVisit source
- Reference 11POLLpoll.qu.eduVisit source
- Reference 12WHATUKTHINKSwhatukthinks.orgVisit source
- Reference 13YOUGOVyougov.co.ukVisit source
- Reference 14PEWRESEARCHpewresearch.orgVisit source
- Reference 15MARISTPOLLmaristpoll.marist.eduVisit source
- Reference 16MAINSTREETRESEARCHmainstreetresearch.caVisit source
- Reference 17FOXNEWSfoxnews.comVisit source
- Reference 18EMERSONPOLLINGemersonpolling.comVisit source
- Reference 19SURVEYMONKEYsurveymonkey.comVisit source
- Reference 20IFOPifop.comVisit source
- Reference 21RASMUSSENREPORTSrasmussenreports.comVisit source
- Reference 22THETRAFALGARGROUPthetrafalgargroup.orgVisit source
- Reference 23POLLBLUDGERpollbludger.netVisit source
- Reference 24AAPORaapor.orgVisit source
- Reference 25PROpro.morningconsult.comVisit source
- Reference 26ELECTORALCALCULUSelectoralcalculus.co.ukVisit source
- Reference 27NORCnorc.orgVisit source
- Reference 28ROTHENBERGPOLITICALREPORTrothenbergpoliticalreport.comVisit source
- Reference 29CENSUScensus.govVisit source
- Reference 30ELECTIONMODELelectionmodel.stanford.eduVisit source
- Reference 31CDCcdc.govVisit source
- Reference 32QUALTRICSqualtrics.comVisit source
- Reference 33CATALISTcatalist.usVisit source
- Reference 34ROBERTYANGrobertyang.comVisit source
- Reference 35APNOCVOTERapnocvoter.comVisit source
- Reference 36APNORCapnorc.orgVisit source
- Reference 37NAVIGATORRESEARCHnavigatorresearch.orgVisit source
- Reference 38KFFkff.orgVisit source
- Reference 39AAPIDATAaapidata.comVisit source
- Reference 40PRRIprri.orgVisit source
- Reference 41GLAADglaad.orgVisit source
- Reference 42REMINGTONRESEARCHGROUPremingtonresearchgroup.comVisit source
- Reference 43AJCajc.orgVisit source
- Reference 44CAIRcair.comVisit source
- Reference 45CBSNEWScbsnews.comVisit source
- Reference 46WASHINGTONPOSTwashingtonpost.comVisit source
- Reference 47CIRCLEcircle.tufts.eduVisit source
- Reference 48ROPERCENTERropercenter.cornell.eduVisit source
- Reference 49ELECTIONSTUDIESelectionstudies.orgVisit source
- Reference 50APNEWSapnews.comVisit source
- Reference 51NPRnpr.orgVisit source
- Reference 52PEWFORUMpewforum.orgVisit source
- Reference 53STATISTAstatista.comVisit source
- Reference 54NBCNEWSnbcnews.comVisit source
- Reference 55NATESILVERnatesilver.netVisit source
- Reference 56THEATLANTICtheatlantic.comVisit source
- Reference 57TODAYtoday.yougov.comVisit source
- Reference 58CCEScces.gov.harvard.eduVisit source
- Reference 59ECONOMISTeconomist.comVisit source
- Reference 60ELECTIONelection.princeton.eduVisit source
- Reference 61REALCLEARPOLLINGrealclearpolling.comVisit source