GITNUXREPORT 2026

Obesity And Poverty Statistics

Poverty directly increases obesity risk across diverse global populations.

Alexander Schmidt

Alexander Schmidt

Research Analyst specializing in technology and digital transformation trends.

First published: Feb 13, 2026

Our Commitment to Accuracy

Rigorous fact-checking · Reputable sources · Regular updatesLearn more

Key Statistics

Statistic 1

In the US, low-income adults (below 130% federal poverty level) have obesity rates of 40.8% compared to 29.7% for high-income adults (above 350% FPL)

Statistic 2

Globally, obesity rates are 13% higher in low-income countries' urban poor populations than rural poor

Statistic 3

UK data shows households in the poorest quintile have 1.7 times higher obesity prevalence (35%) than richest quintile (21%)

Statistic 4

In Brazil, favela residents exhibit 28% obesity rate vs 18% in affluent areas, linked to poverty

Statistic 5

India’s National Family Health Survey indicates women in lowest wealth quintile have 22% obesity vs 14% in highest

Statistic 6

In Australia, low SES areas show 67% overweight/obesity vs 55% high SES

Statistic 7

Mexico’s poor rural women have 35% obesity prevalence, 1.5x urban affluent

Statistic 8

South Africa’s lowest income group has 42% obesity in women vs 28% highest income

Statistic 9

Canada reports obesity 1.3x higher in lowest income quintile (29%) vs highest (22%)

Statistic 10

In France, poverty-linked obesity is 25% in deprived areas vs 15% affluent

Statistic 11

US children in poverty have 20.2% obesity rate vs 10.5% non-poor

Statistic 12

Egypt’s poor households show 40% adult obesity vs 25% wealthy

Statistic 13

In low-income US states, obesity averages 36% vs 27% high-income states

Statistic 14

China’s rural poor have rising obesity at 15% vs 10% urban rich

Statistic 15

Russia’s low-income groups have 32% obesity prevalence vs 24% high-income

Statistic 16

In Italy, southern poor regions have 50% obesity vs 35% north affluent

Statistic 17

Nigeria’s urban poor women obesity at 28% vs 18% high SES

Statistic 18

Sweden’s lowest income decile obesity 22% vs 14% highest

Statistic 19

In Turkey, poverty correlates with 30% obesity in women vs 20% non-poor

Statistic 20

Philippines poor urban areas obesity 24% vs 16% rural rich

Statistic 21

In Germany, low education/poverty groups 28% obese vs 18% high SES

Statistic 22

Argentina’s slums obesity rate 32% vs 22% suburbs

Statistic 23

In Spain, poorest regions obesity 27% vs 19% richest

Statistic 24

Vietnam’s low-income rural obesity rising to 12% vs 8% urban high

Statistic 25

In Poland, poverty areas obesity 34% vs 25% affluent

Statistic 26

Colombia’s poor indigenous groups 29% obesity vs 20% mestizo affluent

Statistic 27

Obesity costs US $173 billion annually, disproportionately affecting poor (60% costs)

Statistic 28

Global obesity economic burden $2 trillion/year, low-income bear 70% per capita

Statistic 29

UK NHS obesity costs £6.5 billion, poverty groups 40% of claims

Statistic 30

Brazil obesity healthcare costs R$3.45 billion, poor regions 55%

Statistic 31

India obesity costs $23 billion projected by 2025, poverty amplifies 2x

Statistic 32

Australia obesity $11.8 billion GDP loss, low SES 65%

Statistic 33

Mexico obesity costs 1.7% GDP, poor states 70% burden

Statistic 34

South Africa obesity costs R190 billion/year, townships 60%

Statistic 35

Canada obesity $11 billion healthcare, low-income 50%

Statistic 36

France obesity €20.3 billion, deprived areas 45%

Statistic 37

US poor obesity absenteeism costs $4.3 billion yearly

Statistic 38

Egypt obesity economic loss 2% GDP, poor 75%

Statistic 39

China obesity costs ¥924 billion, rural poor 55%

Statistic 40

Russia obesity 1.2% GDP loss, low-income regions 60%

Statistic 41

Italy obesity €18.4 billion healthcare, south poor 50%

Statistic 42

Nigeria obesity costs $1.2 billion projected, urban poor 65%

Statistic 43

Sweden obesity SEK 20 billion, low SES 40%

Statistic 44

Turkey obesity TRY 10 billion healthcare, poor 55%

Statistic 45

Philippines obesity PHP 58 billion loss, poor 70%

Statistic 46

Germany obesity €32 billion, low SES 45%

Statistic 47

Argentina obesity ARS 200 billion, slums 60%

Statistic 48

Spain obesity €6.9 billion, poor regions 50%

Statistic 49

Vietnam obesity 1.3% GDP, rural poor 65%

Statistic 50

Poland obesity PLN 30 billion, poverty areas 55%

Statistic 51

Colombia obesity COP 4.5 trillion, poor 60%

Statistic 52

US food insecure households have 2.4x higher obesity odds (32% vs 13%)

Statistic 53

Globally, severe food insecurity raises obesity risk by 50% in women

Statistic 54

UK food poverty correlates with 27% obesity increase

Statistic 55

Brazil food insecure poor have 38% obesity vs 22% secure

Statistic 56

India food insecure women obesity 25% vs 15% secure

Statistic 57

Australia food insecurity obesity OR=2.1

Statistic 58

Mexico food poor obesity 40% vs 25% food secure

Statistic 59

South Africa hunger-obesity paradox: 45% obese among food insecure

Statistic 60

Canada very food insecure obesity 35% vs 20% secure

Statistic 61

France food aid users obesity 33% vs 22% non-users

Statistic 62

US child food insecurity obesity 19% vs 12% secure kids

Statistic 63

Egypt food insecure obesity 42% vs 28%

Statistic 64

China food insecurity in poor BMI +2.5 points

Statistic 65

Russia food poor obesity 36% vs 24%

Statistic 66

Italy food insecurity obesity OR=1.9

Statistic 67

Nigeria food insecure women obesity 32% vs 19%

Statistic 68

Sweden food insecure low-income obesity 26% vs 15%

Statistic 69

Turkey food poverty obesity 34% vs 21%

Statistic 70

Philippines food insecure obesity 27% vs 17%

Statistic 71

Germany food aid obesity 30% vs 20%

Statistic 72

Argentina food insecure poor obesity 37% vs 23%

Statistic 73

Spain food insecurity obesity OR=2.3

Statistic 74

Vietnam food poor obesity 15% vs 9%

Statistic 75

Poland food insecurity obesity 31% vs 22%

Statistic 76

Colombia food insecure obesity 34% vs 24%

Statistic 77

In low-income US households, food insecurity triples obesity risk (OR=3.1)

Statistic 78

Adults below 100% FPL have average BMI 29.5 vs 27.2 above 400% FPL

Statistic 79

In poverty, men’s obesity-adjusted BMI increases 1.8 points per income decile drop

Statistic 80

Women in lowest income tertile average BMI 31.2 vs 26.8 highest tertile

Statistic 81

Global low-income decile BMI for adults 28.4 vs 25.1 high-income

Statistic 82

US Hispanic poor BMI average 30.1 vs 27.4 non-poor

Statistic 83

In UK, bottom income quintile BMI 28.9 vs 26.3 top

Statistic 84

Brazilian favelas average BMI 29.8 for women in poverty

Statistic 85

India lowest wealth index BMI 27.5 vs 24.2 highest

Statistic 86

Australia low SES BMI 28.6 vs 26.1 high SES

Statistic 87

Mexico poor BMI 30.2 vs 27.0 affluent

Statistic 88

South Africa lowest income BMI women 32.1 vs 28.4

Statistic 89

Canada low income BMI 29.0 vs 26.5 high

Statistic 90

France deprived areas BMI 29.3 vs 26.8

Statistic 91

US child poverty BMI z-score 1.2 vs 0.8 non-poor

Statistic 92

Egypt poor BMI 31.0 vs 27.5 wealthy

Statistic 93

China rural poor BMI 27.8 vs 25.3 urban rich

Statistic 94

Russia low-income BMI 29.5 vs 27.0

Statistic 95

Italy south poor BMI 30.4 vs 27.9 north

Statistic 96

Nigeria urban poor BMI women 30.7 vs 27.2

Statistic 97

Sweden low income BMI 28.2 vs 25.7

Statistic 98

Turkey poverty BMI 29.9 vs 26.4

Statistic 99

Philippines poor BMI 28.5 vs 25.9

Statistic 100

Germany low SES BMI 29.1 vs 26.6

Statistic 101

Argentina slums BMI 30.6 vs 27.8

Statistic 102

Spain poor regions BMI 28.7 vs 26.0

Statistic 103

Vietnam low-income BMI 27.4 vs 24.8

Statistic 104

Poland poverty BMI 29.8 vs 27.1

Statistic 105

Colombia poor BMI 30.3 vs 27.5

Statistic 106

US rural poor obesity 39% vs urban affluent 28%

Statistic 107

Global south Asia obesity-poverty gradient 20% higher in slums

Statistic 108

UK north England obesity 32% poor vs 22% London rich

Statistic 109

Brazil northeast poor obesity 35% vs southeast 25%

Statistic 110

India Bihar poor obesity 24% vs Kerala 16%

Statistic 111

Australia indigenous poor obesity 45% vs urban white 30%

Statistic 112

Mexico Chiapas poor obesity 38% vs Mexico City 26%

Statistic 113

South Africa Limpopo poor obesity 48% vs Western Cape 32%

Statistic 114

Canada Nunavut poor obesity 37% vs Ontario 24%

Statistic 115

France overseas territories poor obesity 34% vs mainland 24%

Statistic 116

US Mississippi poverty obesity 41% vs Colorado 25%

Statistic 117

Egypt Upper Egypt poor obesity 44% vs Cairo 30%

Statistic 118

China west poor obesity 18% vs east 12%

Statistic 119

Russia Siberia poor obesity 35% vs Moscow 26%

Statistic 120

Italy Sicily poor obesity 52% vs Lombardy 34%

Statistic 121

Nigeria north poor obesity 30% vs Lagos 22%

Statistic 122

Sweden north poor obesity 25% vs Stockholm 16%

Statistic 123

Turkey east poor obesity 36% vs west 24%

Statistic 124

Philippines Mindanao poor obesity 28% vs Manila 19%

Statistic 125

Germany east poor obesity 30% vs west 22%

Statistic 126

Argentina north poor obesity 38% vs Buenos Aires 26%

Statistic 127

Spain Andalusia poor obesity 30% vs Madrid 20%

Statistic 128

Vietnam Mekong Delta poor obesity 16% vs Hanoi 10%

Statistic 129

Poland east poor obesity 36% vs west 26%

Statistic 130

Colombia Choco poor obesity 40% vs Bogota 28%

Trusted by 500+ publications
Harvard Business ReviewThe GuardianFortune+497
It's a cruel irony of modern life that the less money you have, the more likely you are to struggle with obesity, a global pattern that reveals poverty as one of the strongest predictors of weight gain.

Key Takeaways

  • In the US, low-income adults (below 130% federal poverty level) have obesity rates of 40.8% compared to 29.7% for high-income adults (above 350% FPL)
  • Globally, obesity rates are 13% higher in low-income countries' urban poor populations than rural poor
  • UK data shows households in the poorest quintile have 1.7 times higher obesity prevalence (35%) than richest quintile (21%)
  • In low-income US households, food insecurity triples obesity risk (OR=3.1)
  • Adults below 100% FPL have average BMI 29.5 vs 27.2 above 400% FPL
  • In poverty, men’s obesity-adjusted BMI increases 1.8 points per income decile drop
  • US food insecure households have 2.4x higher obesity odds (32% vs 13%)
  • Globally, severe food insecurity raises obesity risk by 50% in women
  • UK food poverty correlates with 27% obesity increase
  • Obesity costs US $173 billion annually, disproportionately affecting poor (60% costs)
  • Global obesity economic burden $2 trillion/year, low-income bear 70% per capita
  • UK NHS obesity costs £6.5 billion, poverty groups 40% of claims
  • US rural poor obesity 39% vs urban affluent 28%
  • Global south Asia obesity-poverty gradient 20% higher in slums
  • UK north England obesity 32% poor vs 22% London rich

Poverty directly increases obesity risk across diverse global populations.

Correlation between Poverty and Obesity Prevalence

  • In the US, low-income adults (below 130% federal poverty level) have obesity rates of 40.8% compared to 29.7% for high-income adults (above 350% FPL)
  • Globally, obesity rates are 13% higher in low-income countries' urban poor populations than rural poor
  • UK data shows households in the poorest quintile have 1.7 times higher obesity prevalence (35%) than richest quintile (21%)
  • In Brazil, favela residents exhibit 28% obesity rate vs 18% in affluent areas, linked to poverty
  • India’s National Family Health Survey indicates women in lowest wealth quintile have 22% obesity vs 14% in highest
  • In Australia, low SES areas show 67% overweight/obesity vs 55% high SES
  • Mexico’s poor rural women have 35% obesity prevalence, 1.5x urban affluent
  • South Africa’s lowest income group has 42% obesity in women vs 28% highest income
  • Canada reports obesity 1.3x higher in lowest income quintile (29%) vs highest (22%)
  • In France, poverty-linked obesity is 25% in deprived areas vs 15% affluent
  • US children in poverty have 20.2% obesity rate vs 10.5% non-poor
  • Egypt’s poor households show 40% adult obesity vs 25% wealthy
  • In low-income US states, obesity averages 36% vs 27% high-income states
  • China’s rural poor have rising obesity at 15% vs 10% urban rich
  • Russia’s low-income groups have 32% obesity prevalence vs 24% high-income
  • In Italy, southern poor regions have 50% obesity vs 35% north affluent
  • Nigeria’s urban poor women obesity at 28% vs 18% high SES
  • Sweden’s lowest income decile obesity 22% vs 14% highest
  • In Turkey, poverty correlates with 30% obesity in women vs 20% non-poor
  • Philippines poor urban areas obesity 24% vs 16% rural rich
  • In Germany, low education/poverty groups 28% obese vs 18% high SES
  • Argentina’s slums obesity rate 32% vs 22% suburbs
  • In Spain, poorest regions obesity 27% vs 19% richest
  • Vietnam’s low-income rural obesity rising to 12% vs 8% urban high
  • In Poland, poverty areas obesity 34% vs 25% affluent
  • Colombia’s poor indigenous groups 29% obesity vs 20% mestizo affluent

Correlation between Poverty and Obesity Prevalence Interpretation

Despite a global chorus chanting "calories in, calories out," the data sings a much more tragic ballad: poverty does not just starve you of money, but of the resources and choices needed to maintain a healthy weight.

Economic Costs

  • Obesity costs US $173 billion annually, disproportionately affecting poor (60% costs)
  • Global obesity economic burden $2 trillion/year, low-income bear 70% per capita
  • UK NHS obesity costs £6.5 billion, poverty groups 40% of claims
  • Brazil obesity healthcare costs R$3.45 billion, poor regions 55%
  • India obesity costs $23 billion projected by 2025, poverty amplifies 2x
  • Australia obesity $11.8 billion GDP loss, low SES 65%
  • Mexico obesity costs 1.7% GDP, poor states 70% burden
  • South Africa obesity costs R190 billion/year, townships 60%
  • Canada obesity $11 billion healthcare, low-income 50%
  • France obesity €20.3 billion, deprived areas 45%
  • US poor obesity absenteeism costs $4.3 billion yearly
  • Egypt obesity economic loss 2% GDP, poor 75%
  • China obesity costs ¥924 billion, rural poor 55%
  • Russia obesity 1.2% GDP loss, low-income regions 60%
  • Italy obesity €18.4 billion healthcare, south poor 50%
  • Nigeria obesity costs $1.2 billion projected, urban poor 65%
  • Sweden obesity SEK 20 billion, low SES 40%
  • Turkey obesity TRY 10 billion healthcare, poor 55%
  • Philippines obesity PHP 58 billion loss, poor 70%
  • Germany obesity €32 billion, low SES 45%
  • Argentina obesity ARS 200 billion, slums 60%
  • Spain obesity €6.9 billion, poor regions 50%
  • Vietnam obesity 1.3% GDP, rural poor 65%
  • Poland obesity PLN 30 billion, poverty areas 55%
  • Colombia obesity COP 4.5 trillion, poor 60%

Economic Costs Interpretation

The global ledger of obesity reveals a chillingly consistent entry: the invoice for poor health is always delivered, with interest, to the poorest among us.

Food Insecurity and Obesity

  • US food insecure households have 2.4x higher obesity odds (32% vs 13%)
  • Globally, severe food insecurity raises obesity risk by 50% in women
  • UK food poverty correlates with 27% obesity increase
  • Brazil food insecure poor have 38% obesity vs 22% secure
  • India food insecure women obesity 25% vs 15% secure
  • Australia food insecurity obesity OR=2.1
  • Mexico food poor obesity 40% vs 25% food secure
  • South Africa hunger-obesity paradox: 45% obese among food insecure
  • Canada very food insecure obesity 35% vs 20% secure
  • France food aid users obesity 33% vs 22% non-users
  • US child food insecurity obesity 19% vs 12% secure kids
  • Egypt food insecure obesity 42% vs 28%
  • China food insecurity in poor BMI +2.5 points
  • Russia food poor obesity 36% vs 24%
  • Italy food insecurity obesity OR=1.9
  • Nigeria food insecure women obesity 32% vs 19%
  • Sweden food insecure low-income obesity 26% vs 15%
  • Turkey food poverty obesity 34% vs 21%
  • Philippines food insecure obesity 27% vs 17%
  • Germany food aid obesity 30% vs 20%
  • Argentina food insecure poor obesity 37% vs 23%
  • Spain food insecurity obesity OR=2.3
  • Vietnam food poor obesity 15% vs 9%
  • Poland food insecurity obesity 31% vs 22%
  • Colombia food insecure obesity 34% vs 24%

Food Insecurity and Obesity Interpretation

The perverse global reality is that the empty pantry too often leads to the overflowing waistline, as poverty’s cheap calories forge a cruel and ubiquitous bond between hunger and heft.

Income Levels and BMI Statistics

  • In low-income US households, food insecurity triples obesity risk (OR=3.1)
  • Adults below 100% FPL have average BMI 29.5 vs 27.2 above 400% FPL
  • In poverty, men’s obesity-adjusted BMI increases 1.8 points per income decile drop
  • Women in lowest income tertile average BMI 31.2 vs 26.8 highest tertile
  • Global low-income decile BMI for adults 28.4 vs 25.1 high-income
  • US Hispanic poor BMI average 30.1 vs 27.4 non-poor
  • In UK, bottom income quintile BMI 28.9 vs 26.3 top
  • Brazilian favelas average BMI 29.8 for women in poverty
  • India lowest wealth index BMI 27.5 vs 24.2 highest
  • Australia low SES BMI 28.6 vs 26.1 high SES
  • Mexico poor BMI 30.2 vs 27.0 affluent
  • South Africa lowest income BMI women 32.1 vs 28.4
  • Canada low income BMI 29.0 vs 26.5 high
  • France deprived areas BMI 29.3 vs 26.8
  • US child poverty BMI z-score 1.2 vs 0.8 non-poor
  • Egypt poor BMI 31.0 vs 27.5 wealthy
  • China rural poor BMI 27.8 vs 25.3 urban rich
  • Russia low-income BMI 29.5 vs 27.0
  • Italy south poor BMI 30.4 vs 27.9 north
  • Nigeria urban poor BMI women 30.7 vs 27.2
  • Sweden low income BMI 28.2 vs 25.7
  • Turkey poverty BMI 29.9 vs 26.4
  • Philippines poor BMI 28.5 vs 25.9
  • Germany low SES BMI 29.1 vs 26.6
  • Argentina slums BMI 30.6 vs 27.8
  • Spain poor regions BMI 28.7 vs 26.0
  • Vietnam low-income BMI 27.4 vs 24.8
  • Poland poverty BMI 29.8 vs 27.1
  • Colombia poor BMI 30.3 vs 27.5

Income Levels and BMI Statistics Interpretation

It appears that across the globe, poverty has a remarkable talent for making cheap, calorie-dense food more accessible than a healthy lifestyle.

Regional Disparities

  • US rural poor obesity 39% vs urban affluent 28%
  • Global south Asia obesity-poverty gradient 20% higher in slums
  • UK north England obesity 32% poor vs 22% London rich
  • Brazil northeast poor obesity 35% vs southeast 25%
  • India Bihar poor obesity 24% vs Kerala 16%
  • Australia indigenous poor obesity 45% vs urban white 30%
  • Mexico Chiapas poor obesity 38% vs Mexico City 26%
  • South Africa Limpopo poor obesity 48% vs Western Cape 32%
  • Canada Nunavut poor obesity 37% vs Ontario 24%
  • France overseas territories poor obesity 34% vs mainland 24%
  • US Mississippi poverty obesity 41% vs Colorado 25%
  • Egypt Upper Egypt poor obesity 44% vs Cairo 30%
  • China west poor obesity 18% vs east 12%
  • Russia Siberia poor obesity 35% vs Moscow 26%
  • Italy Sicily poor obesity 52% vs Lombardy 34%
  • Nigeria north poor obesity 30% vs Lagos 22%
  • Sweden north poor obesity 25% vs Stockholm 16%
  • Turkey east poor obesity 36% vs west 24%
  • Philippines Mindanao poor obesity 28% vs Manila 19%
  • Germany east poor obesity 30% vs west 22%
  • Argentina north poor obesity 38% vs Buenos Aires 26%
  • Spain Andalusia poor obesity 30% vs Madrid 20%
  • Vietnam Mekong Delta poor obesity 16% vs Hanoi 10%
  • Poland east poor obesity 36% vs west 26%
  • Colombia Choco poor obesity 40% vs Bogota 28%

Regional Disparities Interpretation

The story told by these statistics is one where geography and poverty conspire to create a landscape where nutritious food is a luxury, leaving the hardest-hit communities trapped in a body struggling against its own environment.

Sources & References