GITNUXREPORT 2026

Myeloma Survival Statistics

Modern treatments have greatly improved multiple myeloma survival rates over time.

Sarah Mitchell

Sarah Mitchell

Senior Researcher specializing in consumer behavior and market trends.

First published: Feb 13, 2026

Our Commitment to Accuracy

Rigorous fact-checking · Reputable sources · Regular updatesLearn more

Key Statistics

Statistic 1

Median overall survival for multiple myeloma patients diagnosed between 2013-2019 is 72.3 months according to SEER data

Statistic 2

5-year relative survival rate for multiple myeloma is 59.8% for patients diagnosed 2014-2020 per American Cancer Society

Statistic 3

Median OS of 124 months for transplant-eligible patients in the era of novel agents from IMF data

Statistic 4

10-year OS rate of 44% for standard-risk myeloma patients post-ASCT

Statistic 5

Median OS improved from 29.4 months (1990s) to 62.1 months (2010s) per Mayo Clinic study

Statistic 6

OS at 3 years is 82% for newly diagnosed myeloma with VRd induction

Statistic 7

Median OS of 82.8 months for patients with IgG myeloma subtype

Statistic 8

5-year OS rate of 57.2% for localized myeloma vs 51.1% distant stage per SEER 2015-2019

Statistic 9

Median OS of 5.3 years for African American patients vs 4.8 years for whites

Statistic 10

OS probability at 5 years is 55% with bortezomib-based regimens in elderly

Statistic 11

Median OS of 136 months for patients achieving CR post-induction

Statistic 12

7-year OS rate of 50% for transplant-ineligible NDMM with Rd continuous

Statistic 13

Median OS of 43 months for relapsed/refractory myeloma post-lenalidomide

Statistic 14

3-year OS of 70% in high-dose melphalan + ASCT arm of IFM 2009 trial

Statistic 15

OS at 8 years is 41% for patients with del(17p) despite modern therapy

Statistic 16

Median OS of 96 months for R-ISS stage I patients diagnosed 2011-2018

Statistic 17

5-year OS improved to 61% from 34% between 2000-2019 per Swedish registry

Statistic 18

Median OS of 75 months for patients over 75 years with Dara-VMP

Statistic 19

10-year OS rate of 37% for NDMM with autologous stem cell transplant

Statistic 20

OS hazard ratio 0.72 for quadruplet vs triplet therapy in ALCYONE trial

Statistic 21

Median OS of 53 months for extramedullary disease at diagnosis

Statistic 22

4-year OS of 68% with isatuximab + Pd in RRMM per ICARIA-MM

Statistic 23

Median OS of 112 months for hyperdiploid myeloma patients

Statistic 24

5-year OS rate of 64% for females vs 55% males per SEER 2016-2020

Statistic 25

OS at 2 years is 91% with VRd in transplant-eligible NDMM from SWOG S0777

Statistic 26

Median OS of 47 months for t(4;14) positive patients

Statistic 27

6-year OS of 52% post-maintenance lenalidomide in CALGB 100104

Statistic 28

Median OS of 125 months for patients <65 years with standard risk

Statistic 29

3-year OS rate of 78% with Dara-VRd in GRIFFIN trial

Statistic 30

OS probability at 10 years is 28% for R-ISS stage III

Statistic 31

Median PFS of 18.1 months with bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP) in VISTA trial for NDMM non-transplant

Statistic 32

PFS at 3 years is 56% with daratumumab-VMP in ALCYONE trial

Statistic 33

Median PFS of 20.6 months with carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRd) in ASPIRE trial for RRMM

Statistic 34

12-month PFS rate of 86.9% with daratumumab-VRd in GRIFFIN trial for transplant-eligible NDMM

Statistic 35

Median PFS of 30.4 months with VRd induction followed by ASCT and lenalidomide maintenance in SWOG S0777

Statistic 36

PFS hazard ratio 0.56 with isatuximab-pomalidomide-dex (Isa-Pd) vs Pd in ICARIA-MM

Statistic 37

Median PFS of 11.9 months with lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) in MM-009/010 trials for RRMM

Statistic 38

18-month PFS of 68% with quadruplet Dara-KRd in PERSEUS trial NDMM

Statistic 39

Median PFS of 16.8 months with pomalidomide-dex in IFM 2010-03 trial RRMM

Statistic 40

PFS at 24 months is 82.9% with D-VRd vs 74.3% VRd in PERSEUS

Statistic 41

Median PFS of 43 months with continuous Rd in FIRST trial transplant-ineligible NDMM

Statistic 42

6-month PFS rate of 71.6% with selinexor + bortezomib-dex in BOSTON trial

Statistic 43

Median PFS of 22.4 months with elotuzumab-lenalidomide-dex (Elo-Rd) in ELOQUENT-2

Statistic 44

PFS at 1 year is 88% post-ASCT with bortezomib maintenance in HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4

Statistic 45

Median PFS of 28.6 months with daratumumab-Rd in MAIA trial elderly NDMM

Statistic 46

36-month PFS of 57.9% with teclistamab in CARTITUDE-1 for RRMM

Statistic 47

Median PFS of 13.3 months with Pd in ICARIA-MM control arm

Statistic 48

PFS hazard ratio 0.42 with cilta-cel vs standard in CARTITUDE-4 NDMM

Statistic 49

Median PFS of 34.2 months with KRd + ASCT in FORTE trial

Statistic 50

12-month PFS of 92.2% with D-VMP in ALCYONE

Statistic 51

Median PFS of 19.2 months with ixazomib-Rd in TOURMALINE MM1 RRMM

Statistic 52

PFS at 18 months is 51% with RVd in transplant-ineligible from MAIA-like

Statistic 53

Median PFS of 67.9 months with Dara-VRd induction in GRIFFIN post-ASCT

Statistic 54

24-week PFS rate of 89.7% with belantamab mafodotin in DREAMM-2

Statistic 55

Median PFS of 7.5 months with Vd in POLLUX control for RRMM

Statistic 56

30-month PFS of 47.5% with Elo-Rd in ELOQUENT-2

Statistic 57

Median PFS of 25.7 months with D-Vd in CASTOR trial RRMM

Statistic 58

Median OS 108 months for patients <65 years with ASCT in IFM trials

Statistic 59

5-year OS 42% for patients aged 75+ vs 68% <65 per SEER 2015-2019

Statistic 60

Median OS 34 months for high-risk cytogenetics (del17p, t4;14, t14;16)

Statistic 61

OS HR 1.45 for males vs females in large US cohort

Statistic 62

Median survival 28 months with renal failure (CrCl<30) at diagnosis

Statistic 63

3-year OS 85% for standard-risk vs 60% high-risk post-ASCT

Statistic 64

Median OS 62 months for African Americans vs 55 months Caucasians adjusted

Statistic 65

Survival reduced by 20 months with extramedullary plasmacytomas

Statistic 66

10-year OS 50% for patients with hyperdiploidy vs 30% gain(1q)

Statistic 67

Median OS 48 months for obese patients (BMI>30) NDMM

Statistic 68

PFS shorter by 12 months in frail elderly per IMWG frailty index

Statistic 69

OS 72 months median for IgA vs 68 months IgG subtype

Statistic 70

5-year OS 55% with anemia (Hb<10g/dL) vs 65% without

Statistic 71

Median survival 40 months with high LDH (>UNL) at diagnosis

Statistic 72

OS HR 1.8 for smokers in myeloma cohort studies

Statistic 73

7-year OS 45% for diabetic comorbid patients vs 58% non-diabetic

Statistic 74

Median PFS 22 months del(17p) vs 38 months standard risk

Statistic 75

Survival 15% lower in rural vs urban residence per registry data

Statistic 76

Median OS 55 months with bone disease (≥3 lesions) vs 75 without

Statistic 77

4-year OS 70% ECOG 0-1 vs 50% ECOG 2+ performance status

Statistic 78

Median survival 36 months gain(1q) high-level amplification

Statistic 79

OS improved 18 months with insurance coverage in US disparities study

Statistic 80

5-year OS 60% beta-2 microglobulin <3.5 mg/L vs 40% >5.5

Statistic 81

Median PFS 15 months t(4;14) despite intensified therapy

Statistic 82

Survival HR 2.1 for age >80 vs <60 in transplant-ineligible

Statistic 83

3-year OS 78% albumin >3.5 g/dL vs 62% low albumin ISS factor

Statistic 84

Median ISS stage I survival is 61.1 months vs stage III 29.9 months per original ISS

Statistic 85

R-ISS stage I 5-year OS 82% vs stage III 40% in 2015 validation cohort

Statistic 86

Median OS for ISS stage II is 44.2 months in novel agent era

Statistic 87

R-ISS stage II median PFS 36 months vs stage I 52 months in CASSIOPEIA

Statistic 88

3-year OS 91% for R-ISS I vs 56% for R-ISS III in transplant-eligible

Statistic 89

Median survival for Durie-Salmon stage IIIA is 48 months vs IIIB 28 months

Statistic 90

ISS stage I median OS 93 months in era of Rev/Dex + ASCT

Statistic 91

R-ISS high-risk (III) median OS 35.9 months post-2015 diagnosis

Statistic 92

SLiM CRAB criteria high tumor burden median OS 42 months

Statistic 93

Median PFS for R-ISS II 28 months with VRD-based therapy

Statistic 94

ISS stage III 5-year survival 28% vs 65% stage I per SEER linked data

Statistic 95

Revised ISS stage I OS at 5 years 81.9% in European cohort

Statistic 96

Median OS 52 months for stage II DS staging with renal impairment

Statistic 97

R-ISS III median survival 43 months in high LDH subgroup

Statistic 98

ISS I/II combined median PFS 32 months post-ASCT maintenance

Statistic 99

10-year OS for R-ISS I 60% vs 15% R-ISS III in long-term follow-up

Statistic 100

Median OS 67 months for low-risk by FISH vs 36 high-risk ISS adjusted

Statistic 101

Stage IIIB DS median survival 24 months in pre-novel era update

Statistic 102

R-ISS stage II 3-year PFS 65% with quadruplet induction

Statistic 103

ISS stage I survival rate 70% at 7 years with bortezomib induction

Statistic 104

Median OS R-ISS I 125 months vs III 36 months in GMMG cohort

Statistic 105

PFS for high cytogenetic risk within ISS II 18 months median

Statistic 106

5-year OS 75% R-ISS I elderly NDMM with D-VMP

Statistic 107

Median survival stage I DS 72 months in modern registries

Statistic 108

R-ISS adjusted OS HR 2.2 for stage III vs I in meta-analysis

Statistic 109

Median PFS 45 months ISS I post KRd ASCT in FORTE

Statistic 110

Median OS 82 months with VRd + ASCT in transplant-eligible <70 years

Statistic 111

4-year OS 71% with daratumumab-VMP quadruplet in elderly NDMM ALCYONE

Statistic 112

Median PFS 31 months KRd continuous vs 20 months Rd in transplant-ineligible

Statistic 113

36-month OS 84% Dara-Rd vs 68% Rd in MAIA trial

Statistic 114

Median OS not reached at 5 years with lenalidomide maintenance post-ASCT

Statistic 115

PFS HR 0.48 daratumumab-VRd vs VRd in PERSEUS NDMM

Statistic 116

12-month PFS 77% selinexor-Vd vs 34% Vd in BOSTON RRMM

Statistic 117

Median OS 47.6 months teclistamab vs 34.3 months SOC in Majestea-1

Statistic 118

5-year PFS 48% bortezomib maintenance post-ASCT HOVON-65

Statistic 119

OS HR 0.53 cilta-cel vs SOC in CARTITUDE-4 high-risk NDMM

Statistic 120

Median PFS 29.6 months Elo-Rd vs 10.9 Rd ELOQUENT-2 RRMM

Statistic 121

30-month OS 79% D-Vd vs 63% Vd CASTOR RRMM

Statistic 122

Median survival doubled with ASCT vs no transplant in 65-70 yo

Statistic 123

PFS 20.6 months carfilzomib-Rd ASPIRE vs 15.6 Rd

Statistic 124

48-month PFS 65.2% Isa-Pd vs 37.2% Pd ICARIA-MM

Statistic 125

Median OS 31.4 months D-Rd vs 19.4 Rd POLLUX RRMM

Statistic 126

3-year PFS 57% ixazomib-Rd vs 42% Rd TOURMALINE MM1

Statistic 127

OS benefit 12 months with pomalidomide vs HSCT salvage in RRMM

Statistic 128

Median PFS 18 months VMP vs 24 months Rd FIRST trial comparison

Statistic 129

24-month OS 85% with D-VRd in GRIFFIN post-consolidation

Trusted by 500+ publications
Harvard Business ReviewThe GuardianFortune+497
Imagine a world where a multiple myeloma diagnosis no longer meant facing a life expectancy measured in just months, but in years—many years, filled with significant milestones.

Key Takeaways

  • Median overall survival for multiple myeloma patients diagnosed between 2013-2019 is 72.3 months according to SEER data
  • 5-year relative survival rate for multiple myeloma is 59.8% for patients diagnosed 2014-2020 per American Cancer Society
  • Median OS of 124 months for transplant-eligible patients in the era of novel agents from IMF data
  • Median PFS of 18.1 months with bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP) in VISTA trial for NDMM non-transplant
  • PFS at 3 years is 56% with daratumumab-VMP in ALCYONE trial
  • Median PFS of 20.6 months with carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRd) in ASPIRE trial for RRMM
  • Median ISS stage I survival is 61.1 months vs stage III 29.9 months per original ISS
  • R-ISS stage I 5-year OS 82% vs stage III 40% in 2015 validation cohort
  • Median OS for ISS stage II is 44.2 months in novel agent era
  • Median OS 108 months for patients <65 years with ASCT in IFM trials
  • 5-year OS 42% for patients aged 75+ vs 68% <65 per SEER 2015-2019
  • Median OS 34 months for high-risk cytogenetics (del17p, t4;14, t14;16)
  • Median OS 82 months with VRd + ASCT in transplant-eligible <70 years
  • 4-year OS 71% with daratumumab-VMP quadruplet in elderly NDMM ALCYONE
  • Median PFS 31 months KRd continuous vs 20 months Rd in transplant-ineligible

Modern treatments have greatly improved multiple myeloma survival rates over time.

Overall Survival Statistics

  • Median overall survival for multiple myeloma patients diagnosed between 2013-2019 is 72.3 months according to SEER data
  • 5-year relative survival rate for multiple myeloma is 59.8% for patients diagnosed 2014-2020 per American Cancer Society
  • Median OS of 124 months for transplant-eligible patients in the era of novel agents from IMF data
  • 10-year OS rate of 44% for standard-risk myeloma patients post-ASCT
  • Median OS improved from 29.4 months (1990s) to 62.1 months (2010s) per Mayo Clinic study
  • OS at 3 years is 82% for newly diagnosed myeloma with VRd induction
  • Median OS of 82.8 months for patients with IgG myeloma subtype
  • 5-year OS rate of 57.2% for localized myeloma vs 51.1% distant stage per SEER 2015-2019
  • Median OS of 5.3 years for African American patients vs 4.8 years for whites
  • OS probability at 5 years is 55% with bortezomib-based regimens in elderly
  • Median OS of 136 months for patients achieving CR post-induction
  • 7-year OS rate of 50% for transplant-ineligible NDMM with Rd continuous
  • Median OS of 43 months for relapsed/refractory myeloma post-lenalidomide
  • 3-year OS of 70% in high-dose melphalan + ASCT arm of IFM 2009 trial
  • OS at 8 years is 41% for patients with del(17p) despite modern therapy
  • Median OS of 96 months for R-ISS stage I patients diagnosed 2011-2018
  • 5-year OS improved to 61% from 34% between 2000-2019 per Swedish registry
  • Median OS of 75 months for patients over 75 years with Dara-VMP
  • 10-year OS rate of 37% for NDMM with autologous stem cell transplant
  • OS hazard ratio 0.72 for quadruplet vs triplet therapy in ALCYONE trial
  • Median OS of 53 months for extramedullary disease at diagnosis
  • 4-year OS of 68% with isatuximab + Pd in RRMM per ICARIA-MM
  • Median OS of 112 months for hyperdiploid myeloma patients
  • 5-year OS rate of 64% for females vs 55% males per SEER 2016-2020
  • OS at 2 years is 91% with VRd in transplant-eligible NDMM from SWOG S0777
  • Median OS of 47 months for t(4;14) positive patients
  • 6-year OS of 52% post-maintenance lenalidomide in CALGB 100104
  • Median OS of 125 months for patients <65 years with standard risk
  • 3-year OS rate of 78% with Dara-VRd in GRIFFIN trial
  • OS probability at 10 years is 28% for R-ISS stage III

Overall Survival Statistics Interpretation

We are witnessing a story of remarkable scientific progress where a once nearly uniformly fatal diagnosis is becoming a chronic disease for many, yet the tale is punctuated by stark inequalities where a patient’s survival is still heavily dictated by their age, race, genetic risk, and, crucially, their timely access to the latest quadruplet and monoclonal antibody therapies.

Progression-Free Survival Statistics

  • Median PFS of 18.1 months with bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP) in VISTA trial for NDMM non-transplant
  • PFS at 3 years is 56% with daratumumab-VMP in ALCYONE trial
  • Median PFS of 20.6 months with carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRd) in ASPIRE trial for RRMM
  • 12-month PFS rate of 86.9% with daratumumab-VRd in GRIFFIN trial for transplant-eligible NDMM
  • Median PFS of 30.4 months with VRd induction followed by ASCT and lenalidomide maintenance in SWOG S0777
  • PFS hazard ratio 0.56 with isatuximab-pomalidomide-dex (Isa-Pd) vs Pd in ICARIA-MM
  • Median PFS of 11.9 months with lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) in MM-009/010 trials for RRMM
  • 18-month PFS of 68% with quadruplet Dara-KRd in PERSEUS trial NDMM
  • Median PFS of 16.8 months with pomalidomide-dex in IFM 2010-03 trial RRMM
  • PFS at 24 months is 82.9% with D-VRd vs 74.3% VRd in PERSEUS
  • Median PFS of 43 months with continuous Rd in FIRST trial transplant-ineligible NDMM
  • 6-month PFS rate of 71.6% with selinexor + bortezomib-dex in BOSTON trial
  • Median PFS of 22.4 months with elotuzumab-lenalidomide-dex (Elo-Rd) in ELOQUENT-2
  • PFS at 1 year is 88% post-ASCT with bortezomib maintenance in HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4
  • Median PFS of 28.6 months with daratumumab-Rd in MAIA trial elderly NDMM
  • 36-month PFS of 57.9% with teclistamab in CARTITUDE-1 for RRMM
  • Median PFS of 13.3 months with Pd in ICARIA-MM control arm
  • PFS hazard ratio 0.42 with cilta-cel vs standard in CARTITUDE-4 NDMM
  • Median PFS of 34.2 months with KRd + ASCT in FORTE trial
  • 12-month PFS of 92.2% with D-VMP in ALCYONE
  • Median PFS of 19.2 months with ixazomib-Rd in TOURMALINE MM1 RRMM
  • PFS at 18 months is 51% with RVd in transplant-ineligible from MAIA-like
  • Median PFS of 67.9 months with Dara-VRd induction in GRIFFIN post-ASCT
  • 24-week PFS rate of 89.7% with belantamab mafodotin in DREAMM-2
  • Median PFS of 7.5 months with Vd in POLLUX control for RRMM
  • 30-month PFS of 47.5% with Elo-Rd in ELOQUENT-2
  • Median PFS of 25.7 months with D-Vd in CASTOR trial RRMM

Progression-Free Survival Statistics Interpretation

While these numbers reveal a clear and steady march toward turning myeloma into a chronic condition, they also serve as a humbling reminder that progress is measured not just in months gained, but in the relentless pursuit of turning today’s remarkable response rates into tomorrow’s durable cures.

Survival by Patient Factors

  • Median OS 108 months for patients <65 years with ASCT in IFM trials
  • 5-year OS 42% for patients aged 75+ vs 68% <65 per SEER 2015-2019
  • Median OS 34 months for high-risk cytogenetics (del17p, t4;14, t14;16)
  • OS HR 1.45 for males vs females in large US cohort
  • Median survival 28 months with renal failure (CrCl<30) at diagnosis
  • 3-year OS 85% for standard-risk vs 60% high-risk post-ASCT
  • Median OS 62 months for African Americans vs 55 months Caucasians adjusted
  • Survival reduced by 20 months with extramedullary plasmacytomas
  • 10-year OS 50% for patients with hyperdiploidy vs 30% gain(1q)
  • Median OS 48 months for obese patients (BMI>30) NDMM
  • PFS shorter by 12 months in frail elderly per IMWG frailty index
  • OS 72 months median for IgA vs 68 months IgG subtype
  • 5-year OS 55% with anemia (Hb<10g/dL) vs 65% without
  • Median survival 40 months with high LDH (>UNL) at diagnosis
  • OS HR 1.8 for smokers in myeloma cohort studies
  • 7-year OS 45% for diabetic comorbid patients vs 58% non-diabetic
  • Median PFS 22 months del(17p) vs 38 months standard risk
  • Survival 15% lower in rural vs urban residence per registry data
  • Median OS 55 months with bone disease (≥3 lesions) vs 75 without
  • 4-year OS 70% ECOG 0-1 vs 50% ECOG 2+ performance status
  • Median survival 36 months gain(1q) high-level amplification
  • OS improved 18 months with insurance coverage in US disparities study
  • 5-year OS 60% beta-2 microglobulin <3.5 mg/L vs 40% >5.5
  • Median PFS 15 months t(4;14) despite intensified therapy
  • Survival HR 2.1 for age >80 vs <60 in transplant-ineligible
  • 3-year OS 78% albumin >3.5 g/dL vs 62% low albumin ISS factor

Survival by Patient Factors Interpretation

This stark collection of numbers paints a clear, human portrait: survival in myeloma is not a single statistic but a complex equation where the final sum is profoundly shaped by the biology we bring, the bodies we inhabit, the resources we can access, and the sheer luck of our genetic draw.

Survival by Staging Systems

  • Median ISS stage I survival is 61.1 months vs stage III 29.9 months per original ISS
  • R-ISS stage I 5-year OS 82% vs stage III 40% in 2015 validation cohort
  • Median OS for ISS stage II is 44.2 months in novel agent era
  • R-ISS stage II median PFS 36 months vs stage I 52 months in CASSIOPEIA
  • 3-year OS 91% for R-ISS I vs 56% for R-ISS III in transplant-eligible
  • Median survival for Durie-Salmon stage IIIA is 48 months vs IIIB 28 months
  • ISS stage I median OS 93 months in era of Rev/Dex + ASCT
  • R-ISS high-risk (III) median OS 35.9 months post-2015 diagnosis
  • SLiM CRAB criteria high tumor burden median OS 42 months
  • Median PFS for R-ISS II 28 months with VRD-based therapy
  • ISS stage III 5-year survival 28% vs 65% stage I per SEER linked data
  • Revised ISS stage I OS at 5 years 81.9% in European cohort
  • Median OS 52 months for stage II DS staging with renal impairment
  • R-ISS III median survival 43 months in high LDH subgroup
  • ISS I/II combined median PFS 32 months post-ASCT maintenance
  • 10-year OS for R-ISS I 60% vs 15% R-ISS III in long-term follow-up
  • Median OS 67 months for low-risk by FISH vs 36 high-risk ISS adjusted
  • Stage IIIB DS median survival 24 months in pre-novel era update
  • R-ISS stage II 3-year PFS 65% with quadruplet induction
  • ISS stage I survival rate 70% at 7 years with bortezomib induction
  • Median OS R-ISS I 125 months vs III 36 months in GMMG cohort
  • PFS for high cytogenetic risk within ISS II 18 months median
  • 5-year OS 75% R-ISS I elderly NDMM with D-VMP
  • Median survival stage I DS 72 months in modern registries
  • R-ISS adjusted OS HR 2.2 for stage III vs I in meta-analysis
  • Median PFS 45 months ISS I post KRd ASCT in FORTE

Survival by Staging Systems Interpretation

This stark statistical chasm between stages, where a myeloma diagnosis can feel like either a manageable marathon or a desperate sprint, underscores the brutal truth that early detection and accurate risk stratification are not just medical jargon—they are the difference between measuring survival in years versus decades.

Survival by Treatment Modalities

  • Median OS 82 months with VRd + ASCT in transplant-eligible <70 years
  • 4-year OS 71% with daratumumab-VMP quadruplet in elderly NDMM ALCYONE
  • Median PFS 31 months KRd continuous vs 20 months Rd in transplant-ineligible
  • 36-month OS 84% Dara-Rd vs 68% Rd in MAIA trial
  • Median OS not reached at 5 years with lenalidomide maintenance post-ASCT
  • PFS HR 0.48 daratumumab-VRd vs VRd in PERSEUS NDMM
  • 12-month PFS 77% selinexor-Vd vs 34% Vd in BOSTON RRMM
  • Median OS 47.6 months teclistamab vs 34.3 months SOC in Majestea-1
  • 5-year PFS 48% bortezomib maintenance post-ASCT HOVON-65
  • OS HR 0.53 cilta-cel vs SOC in CARTITUDE-4 high-risk NDMM
  • Median PFS 29.6 months Elo-Rd vs 10.9 Rd ELOQUENT-2 RRMM
  • 30-month OS 79% D-Vd vs 63% Vd CASTOR RRMM
  • Median survival doubled with ASCT vs no transplant in 65-70 yo
  • PFS 20.6 months carfilzomib-Rd ASPIRE vs 15.6 Rd
  • 48-month PFS 65.2% Isa-Pd vs 37.2% Pd ICARIA-MM
  • Median OS 31.4 months D-Rd vs 19.4 Rd POLLUX RRMM
  • 3-year PFS 57% ixazomib-Rd vs 42% Rd TOURMALINE MM1
  • OS benefit 12 months with pomalidomide vs HSCT salvage in RRMM
  • Median PFS 18 months VMP vs 24 months Rd FIRST trial comparison
  • 24-month OS 85% with D-VRd in GRIFFIN post-consolidation

Survival by Treatment Modalities Interpretation

We've reached a point in myeloma care where, if you cleverly pick your weapons and sequence your attacks, you can plausibly plan your life around this disease instead of constantly planning your death from it.