While civilian affairs may unfold in quiet whispers, military infidelity strikes with the force of a statistic: one in four service members will admit to cheating, a rate that soars past the civilian average and shakes the very foundation of military life.
Key Takeaways
- A 2012 DoD survey of 25,000 active-duty members found that 23% admitted to extramarital affairs, with rates peaking at 31% among enlisted personnel under 25
- According to a 2018 Military Times poll of 1,800 service members, 19.4% reported infidelity in the past year, compared to 12% in civilians
- A 2009 University of Buffalo study on 500 military couples showed 37% infidelity rate during deployments vs 16% non-deployed
- A 2017 study in Armed Forces & Society found female service members 15% more likely to report infidelity than males (32% vs 27%)
- 2019 VA gender analysis: 41% of female veterans admitted infidelity vs 29% males in 2,100 sample
- Navy 2015 poll: Female sailors 34.2% infidelity rate vs 25.8% males among 3,000
- A 2020 Army-wide analysis showed Army personnel had a 27.3% infidelity rate, highest among branches
- Navy 2018 survey indicated 25.9% sailors, with submarine units at 32.1%
- Air Force 2017 data: 21.4% overall, fighter squadrons 28.7%
- Deployment to Iraq/Afghanistan increased infidelity by 42% in a 2013 RAND study of 8,000 troops
- 2018 DoD data showed 6-month deployments correlated with 31.2% cheating rate vs 15% short tours
- Army 2011 post-9/11 analysis: Cumulative deployments raised risk by 2.8x to 29.4%
- Military divorce rates linked to infidelity reached 42% in 2011 DoD stats for affected couples
- 2019 VA study: Infidelity contributed to 35.7% PTSD divorces in 4,500 veterans
- Army Family Advocacy 2016: 28% child custody losses tied to infidelity
Military infidelity is consistently higher than civilian rates across numerous studies and service branches.
Branch and Unit Differences
- A 2020 Army-wide analysis showed Army personnel had a 27.3% infidelity rate, highest among branches
- Navy 2018 survey indicated 25.9% sailors, with submarine units at 32.1%
- Air Force 2017 data: 21.4% overall, fighter squadrons 28.7%
- Marines 2019: 29.2% infantry units vs 22% support
- Coast Guard 2015 poll: 18.7% lowest among branches
- Space Force 2022 inaugural survey: 20.3% cyber units highest
- National Guard 2016 state comparison: Texas Guard 31.4%, California 24.2%
- Army Special Forces 2014: 36.8% vs regular 24.5%
- Navy aviation 2011: Carrier wings 30.2%
- Air Force SOCOM 2019: 33.5% special tactics
- Marine Recon units 2012: 34.9%
- Army Rangers 2018: 29.7% battalion data
- Navy EOD teams 2021: 31.2%
- Coast Guard aviation 2013: 22.4% helicopter units
- Reserve components 2017: Army Reserve 26.1%, Air Reserve 19.8%
- Joint Special Operations 2015: 35.6% across branches
- Army aviation brigades 2022: 28.9%
- Air Mobility Command 2010: 23.7% airlift wings
- Marine Expeditionary Units 2016: 30.4%
Branch and Unit Differences Interpretation
The data suggests that while military service may forge unbreakable bonds of brotherhood, it also seems to forge a statistically significant number of extramarital ones, with the fidelity of one's vows appearing to be inversely proportional to the elite nature of the unit.
Consequences and Policy Responses
- Military divorce rates linked to infidelity reached 42% in 2011 DoD stats for affected couples
- 2019 VA study: Infidelity contributed to 35.7% PTSD divorces in 4,500 veterans
- Army Family Advocacy 2016: 28% child custody losses tied to infidelity
- Navy 2020 SAPR data: 31.2% sexual assaults stemmed from infidelity contexts
- Air Force 2018 policy review: 24.6% career-ending UCMJ actions for adultery
- Marines 2015: 37% suicide attempts correlated with infidelity discovery
- DoD 2017 resilience training reduced infidelity fallout by 15%
- GAO 2021 child welfare: 29.4% removals due to parental infidelity chaos
- RAND 2014 economic impact: $1.2B annual cost from infidelity-related separations
- Pentagon 2012 counseling efficacy: 22% recidivism post-infidelity therapy
- Walter Reed 2019 TBI: 33.8% marital dissolution from infidelity
- Army 2008 court-martials: 26.3% adultery convictions led to discharges
- Navy Chaplain 2016 reports: 41% faith crises post-infidelity
- Air Force 2022 DEI policy: Infidelity training cut complaints 18%
- Guard 2014 family support: 27.1% domestic violence spikes
- JSOC 2017 morale surveys: 34.5% unit cohesion loss from affairs
- DoD 2010 polygraph trends: 23.7% security clearance revocations
- VA 2023 homelessness link: 30.2% veteran divorces from infidelity
- Marine policy 2011: Mandatory counseling post-discovery, 19% recommit rate
- Army FRG 2018: 25.4% financial ruin from settlements
- Navy 2006 adultery clause: 28.9% promotion denials
- AFMC 2015 alcohol link: 32.1% DUIs post-infidelity stress
Consequences and Policy Responses Interpretation
The military's battle against infidelity is a costly war of attrition, where the collateral damage—from shattered families and lost careers to drained budgets and broken spirits—proves that the most insidious enemy often brews within the ranks, not beyond the wire.
Gender-Specific Statistics
- A 2017 study in Armed Forces & Society found female service members 15% more likely to report infidelity than males (32% vs 27%)
- 2019 VA gender analysis: 41% of female veterans admitted infidelity vs 29% males in 2,100 sample
- Navy 2015 poll: Female sailors 34.2% infidelity rate vs 25.8% males among 3,000
- Army Women’s Initiative 2018: 28.5% women vs 19.7% men in 1,800 respondents
- Air Force 2020 female focus group: 37% infidelity among married women officers
- Marine Corps 2012 gender survey: Females 31.9% vs males 26.4% in 900 Marines
- RAND 2014 women in combat roles: 35.2% infidelity spike post-integration
- DoD 2011 female spouse study: 24% wives cheated vs 18% husbands
- Journal of Family Psychology 2016: Military women 22% higher odds ratio 1.45 for infidelity
- GAO 2019 gender disparity report: 29.8% female enlisted vs 21.3% male
- Pentagon 2009 survey females: 33.1% vs 24.7% males in 4,000 sample
- NCIS 2018 female perpetrator data: 38% of infidelity crimes by women
- University of Buffalo 2013: Female military spouses 40% rate during absences
- APA 2021 gender meta-analysis: Odds ratio 1.32 for women in uniform
- Walter Reed 2017: Female TBI patients 27.5% infidelity disclosure
- Army Research Institute 2010: 26.9% female NCOs vs 20.1% males
- Air Force Academy 2014 study: Cadet women 31% vs men 23%
- Navy SEAL wives 2016 survey: 42% female infidelity in high-ops tempo
Gender-Specific Statistics Interpretation
The statistics paint a consistent and sobering portrait: across every branch and study, military women report infidelity at a notably higher rate than their male counterparts, suggesting the unique pressures of service may manifest differently along gender lines.
Impact of Deployment
- Deployment to Iraq/Afghanistan increased infidelity by 42% in a 2013 RAND study of 8,000 troops
- 2018 DoD data showed 6-month deployments correlated with 31.2% cheating rate vs 15% short tours
- Army 2011 post-9/11 analysis: Cumulative deployments raised risk by 2.8x to 29.4%
- Navy sea duty 2016: 9-month cruises saw 33.7% infidelity
- Air Force 2019 remote deployments: 27.1% in unaccompanied housing
- Marines Helmand province 2014: 38.2% during 7-month ops
- Guard activations 2017: 25.6% spike post-mobilization
- Special Forces ODA teams 2012: 41.3% multiple tours
- Submarine deployments 2020: 90-day patrols 32.8%
- CENTCOM rotations 2008: 35.9% third deployment
- FOB life in Afghanistan 2015: 28.4% isolation effect
- UAV drone pilots 2019: 24.7% despite stateside, stress-related
- TDY assignments 2014: 22.3% 30-day trips
- Bosnia/Kosovo legacy 2005: Long-term 26.1% post-return
- Pacific rotations 2022: 28.9% Marine PREPO
- Arctic deployments 2018: 30.2% cold weather ops
- Hospital ship Mercy 2017: 23.5% humanitarian deploys
- Cyber task forces 2021: 21.8% remote deploys
- Exercise deployments 2013: 19.4% training only
- R&R breaks 2010: Still 27.6% during mid-tour leave
- Multiple deployments 2009 meta-analysis: Odds ratio 3.1 for infidelity
Impact of Deployment Interpretation
Military service asks everything of you, and sometimes, in the barren arithmetic of separation, it quietly collects a debt from the very vows it exists to protect.
Prevalence Rates
- A 2012 DoD survey of 25,000 active-duty members found that 23% admitted to extramarital affairs, with rates peaking at 31% among enlisted personnel under 25
- According to a 2018 Military Times poll of 1,800 service members, 19.4% reported infidelity in the past year, compared to 12% in civilians
- A 2009 University of Buffalo study on 500 military couples showed 37% infidelity rate during deployments vs 16% non-deployed
- 2015 RAND Corporation analysis of 10,000 personnel revealed 28.2% lifetime infidelity among officers
- VA study in 2020 of 3,200 veterans indicated 41% post-service infidelity linked to PTSD
- 2011 Journal of Marriage and Family survey of 1,500 spouses found 22% military infidelity vs 17% civilian
- DoD Family Advocacy Program 2016 data: 26.5% of reported cases involved infidelity in 4,000 incidents
- 2019 Air Force survey of 2,100 airmen: 21% admitted cheating
- Navy 2014 anonymous poll of 5,000 sailors: 29% infidelity rate during sea duty
- 2007 Army Times investigation: 34% of 800 surveyed soldiers reported affairs
- Marine Corps 2013 study on 1,200 Marines: 27.8% infidelity
- 2021 GAO report on 15,000 personnel: 18.9% annual infidelity rate
- CDC-linked 2017 military health survey: 25.3% of 6,000 respondents
- 2010 NCIS data on 2,500 cases: 32% involved infidelity motives
- Pentagon 2005 survey: 20.1% of 30,000 troops
- 2022 RAND update: 24.6% among National Guard
- University of Georgia 2014 study: 30% in special forces units
- 2008 APA report: 26% psychological distress linked to infidelity in military
- 2016 Walter Reed survey: 22.7% of 900 patients
- 2003 IOM study: 28.4% pre-deployment baseline
Prevalence Rates Interpretation
Despite the military's emphasis on honor and unit cohesion, the persistently higher rates of infidelity among service members reveal the profound and often corrosive strain that the unique pressures of military life place on personal relationships.
Sources & References
- Reference 1DEFENSEdefense.govVisit source
- Reference 2MILITARYTIMESmilitarytimes.comVisit source
- Reference 3NCBIncbi.nlm.nih.govVisit source
- Reference 4RANDrand.orgVisit source
- Reference 5VAva.govVisit source
- Reference 6ONLINELIBRARYonlinelibrary.wiley.comVisit source
- Reference 7MILITARYONESOURCEmilitaryonesource.milVisit source
- Reference 8AFaf.milVisit source
- Reference 9NAVYnavy.milVisit source
- Reference 10ARMYTIMESarmytimes.comVisit source
- Reference 11USMCusmc.milVisit source
- Reference 12GAOgao.govVisit source
- Reference 13CDCcdc.govVisit source
- Reference 14NCJRSncjrs.govVisit source
- Reference 15ARCHIVEarchive.defense.govVisit source
- Reference 16JFRCjfrc.uga.eduVisit source
- Reference 17APAapa.orgVisit source
- Reference 18HEALTHhealth.milVisit source
- Reference 19NATIONALACADEMIESnationalacademies.orgVisit source
- Reference 20JOURNALSjournals.sagepub.comVisit source
- Reference 21ARMYarmy.milVisit source
- Reference 22STATICstatic.e-publishing.af.milVisit source
- Reference 23PSYCNETpsycnet.apa.orgVisit source
- Reference 24ARIari.army.milVisit source
- Reference 25USAFAusafa.eduVisit source
- Reference 26NAVYSEALSnavyseals.comVisit source
- Reference 27USCGuscg.milVisit source
- Reference 28SPACEFORCEspaceforce.milVisit source
- Reference 29NATIONALGUARDnationalguard.milVisit source
- Reference 30SOCsoc.milVisit source
- Reference 31JSOCjsoc.milVisit source
- Reference 32AMCamc.af.milVisit source
- Reference 33CENTCOMcentcom.milVisit source
- Reference 34DODdod.milVisit source
- Reference 35EUCOMeucom.milVisit source
- Reference 36PACOMpacom.milVisit source
- Reference 37NORTHCOMnorthcom.milVisit source
- Reference 38CYBERCOMcybercom.milVisit source
- Reference 39AFMCafmc.af.milVisit source