Key Takeaways
- 0.3% to 1.0% risk of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) within 20 days after insertion (risk window after IUD insertion).
- The CDC’s U.S. medical eligibility criteria classify IUD use as Category 1 (no restriction) for most women living with HIV who are stable on ART and have no active STI.
- The IUD market in 2023 was estimated at $2.8 billion globally (forecast baseline).
- In 2019, 38.9% of U.S. women aged 15–49 using contraception used a LARC method (IUD or implant).
- IUDs have an average duration of up to 5 years for LNG-IUD products (clinical use duration depending on product).
- In a systematic review, continuation rates for IUDs were 70% at 12 months and 60% at 24 months (typical continuation patterns).
- In a Cochrane review, IUDs had higher continuation than short-acting methods at 12 months (effect reported as superior continuation).
- In a large observational study, IUD users had discontinuation rates lower than pill users over 12 months (comparative discontinuation).
- Copper IUD users have an average net fertility return to baseline within 1–3 months after removal (time to return of fertility).
- Levonorgestrel IUD users frequently have lighter menstrual bleeding over time; median time to achieve reduced bleeding is 3–6 months (clinical effect timeline).
- Serious infection requiring hospitalization after insertion is rare, estimated at about 1 per 1,000 insertions (infection complications incidence).
- A 2016 systematic review found LARC (including IUDs) averts more unintended pregnancies per dollar than short-acting methods (cost-effectiveness conclusion with multiple studies).
- In a UK analysis, providing IUDs led to net savings of about £100–£200 per woman compared with some short-acting strategies over the modeled horizon (economic evaluation).
- In 2021, the U.S. contraceptive program market for LARC/IUD was valued at about $1.6 billion in sales (U.S. vendor research estimate).
IUDs offer highly effective contraception with rare serious infection, strong continuation, and fast fertility return after removal.
Related reading
01 · Category
Clinical Outcomes2 stats
Clinical Outcomes Interpretation
More related reading
02 · Category
Market & Adoption3 stats
Market & Adoption Interpretation
More related reading
03 · Category
Continuation & Switching5 stats
Continuation & Switching Interpretation
More related reading
04 · Category
Safety, Side Effects7 stats
Safety, Side Effects Interpretation
More related reading
05 · Category
Cost & Value3 stats
Cost & Value Interpretation
How IUDs compare on key outcomes
IUDs show low early health risks and strong continuation, with most eligibility scenarios classified as no restriction.
Cite This Report
This report is designed to be cited. We maintain stable URLs and versioned verification dates. Copy the format appropriate for your publication below.
Henrik Dahl. (2026, February 13). Iud Statistics. Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/iud-statistics
Henrik Dahl. "Iud Statistics." Gitnux, 13 Feb 2026, https://gitnux.org/iud-statistics.
Henrik Dahl. 2026. "Iud Statistics." Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/iud-statistics.
Sources & references
20 datasets cited across this report · attribution is report-level
+10 additional datasets cited (not shown individually)

