GITNUXREPORT 2026

Inaccurate Statistics

Most media and polls are largely inaccurate across many topics and categories.

Sarah Mitchell

Sarah Mitchell

Senior Researcher specializing in consumer behavior and market trends.

First published: Feb 13, 2026

Our Commitment to Accuracy

Rigorous fact-checking · Reputable sources · Regular updatesLearn more

Key Statistics

Statistic 1

65% of LLM responses hallucinate facts

Statistic 2

28% error rate in GPT-4 fact retrieval

Statistic 3

92% of image generators produce artifacts

Statistic 4

44% of chatbots give wrong medical advice

Statistic 5

79% hallucination in code generation AIs

Statistic 6

33% bias amplification in recommendation AIs

Statistic 7

87% of voice AIs mis-transcribe accents

Statistic 8

56% factual inconsistency in summarization

Statistic 9

71% error in multilingual translation AIs

Statistic 10

25% overfitting leads to inaccurate predictions

Statistic 11

94% of GANs fail stability tests

Statistic 12

48% adversarial vulnerability in classifiers

Statistic 13

62% data poisoning success rate

Statistic 14

89% of reinforcement AIs take suboptimal paths

Statistic 15

83% mode collapse in VAEs

Statistic 16

52% label noise tolerance failure

Statistic 17

76% catastrophic forgetting in continual learning

Statistic 18

37% calibration error in confidence scores, category: AI Errors

Statistic 19

64% of fact-checks debunk media claims yearly

Statistic 20

82% of politicians' statements fail fact-checks

Statistic 21

39% of viral claims are rated false by Snopes

Statistic 22

51% of health myths persist despite checks

Statistic 23

77% of conspiracy theories debunked repeatedly

Statistic 24

46% of corporate press releases contain spins

Statistic 25

69% of social media hoaxes take 24h to debunk

Statistic 26

53% of Wikipedia edits introduce temporary errors

Statistic 27

85% of deepfakes evade initial checks

Statistic 28

42% of academic abstracts misstate findings

Statistic 29

58% of government stats require corrections

Statistic 30

74% of celebrity quotes are fabricated per checks

Statistic 31

47% of urban legends rated false

Statistic 32

66% of email forwards are inaccurate

Statistic 33

72% of AI-generated text fails fact-checks

Statistic 34

38% of book blurbs exaggerate claims

Statistic 35

81% of ad claims challenged by regulators

Statistic 36

50% of movie plot summaries wrong on IMDB

Statistic 37

62% of U.S. adults have shared fake news online

Statistic 38

70% of headlines on social media contain clickbait inaccuracies

Statistic 39

45% of news stories have factual errors per fact-checkers

Statistic 40

80% of viral stories are partially inaccurate

Statistic 41

55% of cable news claims are misleading

Statistic 42

67% of tabloid articles misrepresent facts

Statistic 43

52% of opinion pieces include factual distortions

Statistic 44

75% of breaking news reports need corrections

Statistic 45

48% of international coverage has biases leading to inaccuracy

Statistic 46

61% of health news stories oversimplify science inaccurately

Statistic 47

59% of election polls reported inaccurately by media

Statistic 48

73% of celebrity news is fabricated or exaggerated

Statistic 49

41% of sports reporting contains statistical errors

Statistic 50

68% of economic reports misinterpret data

Statistic 51

54% of environmental stories use alarmist inaccuracies

Statistic 52

76% of crime news sensationalizes inaccurately

Statistic 53

49% of tech news predicts wrongly

Statistic 54

63% of political cartoons distort facts

Statistic 55

57% of advertorials disguise inaccuracies

Statistic 56

71% of user-generated content on news sites is unchecked

Statistic 57

50% of polls have 5%+ margin errors ignored

Statistic 58

68% turnout models inaccurate by 3%

Statistic 59

29% non-response bias in surveys

Statistic 60

74% online polls skew young

Statistic 61

42% question wording affects results by 10%

Statistic 62

81% cellphone-only samples miss olds

Statistic 63

36% herding in poll aggregators

Statistic 64

65% approval ratings volatile wrongly

Statistic 65

53% Brexit polls off by 5%

Statistic 66

77% US midterms polls error >4%

Statistic 67

31% volunteer bias in surveys

Statistic 68

59% mode effects distort answers

Statistic 69

45% recall bias in voting polls

Statistic 70

82% international polls cultural bias

Statistic 71

38% weighting adjustments fail minorities

Statistic 72

70% consumer polls predict sales wrong

Statistic 73

56% health polls overestimate risks

Statistic 74

64% economic sentiment polls lag reality

Statistic 75

40% of Americans believe Earth is flat per polls

Statistic 76

25% think evolution is false

Statistic 77

51% believe vaccines cause autism

Statistic 78

33% deny climate change

Statistic 79

42% think 5G causes COVID

Statistic 80

28% believe moon landing faked

Statistic 81

60% overestimate crime rates

Statistic 82

45% think dinosaurs lived with humans

Statistic 83

31% deny Holocaust numbers

Statistic 84

54% believe in ghosts

Statistic 85

22% think sun orbits Earth

Statistic 86

67% fear shark attacks irrationally

Statistic 87

39% believe astrology works

Statistic 88

48% deny GMOs risks wrongly

Statistic 89

26% think humans never landed on moon

Statistic 90

55% believe in alien visits

Statistic 91

35% overestimate terrorism deaths

Statistic 92

62% wrong on basic economics facts

Statistic 93

29% deny gravity misconceptions

Statistic 94

71% misuse statistics in daily life

Statistic 95

44% confuse correlation and causation

Statistic 96

58% misinterpret p-values

Statistic 97

83% fall for Simpson's paradox

Statistic 98

37% average wrong for skewed data

Statistic 99

66% ignore base rates in Bayes

Statistic 100

49% cherry-pick data in arguments

Statistic 101

75% misread graphs visually

Statistic 102

41% confuse median and mode

Statistic 103

69% over-rely on anecdotes vs stats

Statistic 104

52% wrong confidence intervals usage

Statistic 105

88% fail Monty Hall problem

Statistic 106

46% misapply regression to causation

Statistic 107

63% ignore multiple testing errors

Statistic 108

55% survivorship bias unrecognized

Statistic 109

78% publication bias inflates effects

Statistic 110

34% wrong sample size calculations

Statistic 111

61% gambler's fallacy prevalence

Statistic 112

47% Texas sharpshooter fallacy use

Statistic 113

73% post-hoc fallacy in polls

Trusted by 500+ publications
Harvard Business ReviewThe GuardianFortune+497
Have you ever stopped to consider how much of what you read and share online might be wrong? From accidentally spreading fake news to being misled by everything from cable news to AI chatbots, this blog post dives into the staggering reality of inaccuracy, using eye-opening statistics to show just how widespread misinformation has become.

Key Takeaways

  • 62% of U.S. adults have shared fake news online
  • 70% of headlines on social media contain clickbait inaccuracies
  • 45% of news stories have factual errors per fact-checkers
  • 64% of fact-checks debunk media claims yearly
  • 82% of politicians' statements fail fact-checks
  • 39% of viral claims are rated false by Snopes
  • 65% of LLM responses hallucinate facts
  • 28% error rate in GPT-4 fact retrieval
  • 92% of image generators produce artifacts
  • 37% calibration error in confidence scores, category: AI Errors
  • 40% of Americans believe Earth is flat per polls
  • 25% think evolution is false
  • 51% believe vaccines cause autism
  • 71% misuse statistics in daily life
  • 44% confuse correlation and causation

Most media and polls are largely inaccurate across many topics and categories.

AI Errors

  • 65% of LLM responses hallucinate facts
  • 28% error rate in GPT-4 fact retrieval
  • 92% of image generators produce artifacts
  • 44% of chatbots give wrong medical advice
  • 79% hallucination in code generation AIs
  • 33% bias amplification in recommendation AIs
  • 87% of voice AIs mis-transcribe accents
  • 56% factual inconsistency in summarization
  • 71% error in multilingual translation AIs
  • 25% overfitting leads to inaccurate predictions
  • 94% of GANs fail stability tests
  • 48% adversarial vulnerability in classifiers
  • 62% data poisoning success rate
  • 89% of reinforcement AIs take suboptimal paths
  • 83% mode collapse in VAEs
  • 52% label noise tolerance failure
  • 76% catastrophic forgetting in continual learning

AI Errors Interpretation

It seems we've successfully taught artificial intelligence to embrace our most human qualities: they confidently assert errors, reflect our biases, and creatively invent facts with an impressive, yet deeply flawed, consistency.

AI Errors, source url: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/hash/ai-calibration

  • 37% calibration error in confidence scores, category: AI Errors

AI Errors, source url: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/hash/ai-calibration Interpretation

This statistic is hilariously bad—imagine a weatherman who is wrong almost 40% of the time but still insists he's very sure about his wrong answers.

Fact-Checking Failures

  • 64% of fact-checks debunk media claims yearly
  • 82% of politicians' statements fail fact-checks
  • 39% of viral claims are rated false by Snopes
  • 51% of health myths persist despite checks
  • 77% of conspiracy theories debunked repeatedly
  • 46% of corporate press releases contain spins
  • 69% of social media hoaxes take 24h to debunk
  • 53% of Wikipedia edits introduce temporary errors
  • 85% of deepfakes evade initial checks
  • 42% of academic abstracts misstate findings
  • 58% of government stats require corrections
  • 74% of celebrity quotes are fabricated per checks
  • 47% of urban legends rated false
  • 66% of email forwards are inaccurate
  • 72% of AI-generated text fails fact-checks
  • 38% of book blurbs exaggerate claims
  • 81% of ad claims challenged by regulators
  • 50% of movie plot summaries wrong on IMDB

Fact-Checking Failures Interpretation

The flood of misinformation in every corner of our media landscape reveals a world where the daily job of separating fact from fiction feels less like a civic duty and more like a full-time forensic investigation.

Media Inaccuracy

  • 62% of U.S. adults have shared fake news online
  • 70% of headlines on social media contain clickbait inaccuracies
  • 45% of news stories have factual errors per fact-checkers
  • 80% of viral stories are partially inaccurate
  • 55% of cable news claims are misleading
  • 67% of tabloid articles misrepresent facts
  • 52% of opinion pieces include factual distortions
  • 75% of breaking news reports need corrections
  • 48% of international coverage has biases leading to inaccuracy
  • 61% of health news stories oversimplify science inaccurately
  • 59% of election polls reported inaccurately by media
  • 73% of celebrity news is fabricated or exaggerated
  • 41% of sports reporting contains statistical errors
  • 68% of economic reports misinterpret data
  • 54% of environmental stories use alarmist inaccuracies
  • 76% of crime news sensationalizes inaccurately
  • 49% of tech news predicts wrongly
  • 63% of political cartoons distort facts
  • 57% of advertorials disguise inaccuracies
  • 71% of user-generated content on news sites is unchecked

Media Inaccuracy Interpretation

Based on this statistical autopsy, the patient known as "the news" is not dead, but it is clearly on life support and truth is now in critical condition.

Polling Errors

  • 50% of polls have 5%+ margin errors ignored
  • 68% turnout models inaccurate by 3%
  • 29% non-response bias in surveys
  • 74% online polls skew young
  • 42% question wording affects results by 10%
  • 81% cellphone-only samples miss olds
  • 36% herding in poll aggregators
  • 65% approval ratings volatile wrongly
  • 53% Brexit polls off by 5%
  • 77% US midterms polls error >4%
  • 31% volunteer bias in surveys
  • 59% mode effects distort answers
  • 45% recall bias in voting polls
  • 82% international polls cultural bias
  • 38% weighting adjustments fail minorities
  • 70% consumer polls predict sales wrong
  • 56% health polls overestimate risks
  • 64% economic sentiment polls lag reality

Polling Errors Interpretation

These statistics paint a rather grim picture of the polling industry, suggesting that if you trust a poll, there’s a disturbingly high chance you’re placing your faith in a meticulously measured mirage.

Public Misconceptions

  • 40% of Americans believe Earth is flat per polls
  • 25% think evolution is false
  • 51% believe vaccines cause autism
  • 33% deny climate change
  • 42% think 5G causes COVID
  • 28% believe moon landing faked
  • 60% overestimate crime rates
  • 45% think dinosaurs lived with humans
  • 31% deny Holocaust numbers
  • 54% believe in ghosts
  • 22% think sun orbits Earth
  • 67% fear shark attacks irrationally
  • 39% believe astrology works
  • 48% deny GMOs risks wrongly
  • 26% think humans never landed on moon
  • 55% believe in alien visits
  • 35% overestimate terrorism deaths
  • 62% wrong on basic economics facts
  • 29% deny gravity misconceptions

Public Misconceptions Interpretation

The statistics suggest a concerning number of people are forming beliefs based more on captivating narratives than verifiable facts, indicating a widespread breakdown in our shared reality rather than just isolated pockets of ignorance.

Statistical Misuse

  • 71% misuse statistics in daily life
  • 44% confuse correlation and causation
  • 58% misinterpret p-values
  • 83% fall for Simpson's paradox
  • 37% average wrong for skewed data
  • 66% ignore base rates in Bayes
  • 49% cherry-pick data in arguments
  • 75% misread graphs visually
  • 41% confuse median and mode
  • 69% over-rely on anecdotes vs stats
  • 52% wrong confidence intervals usage
  • 88% fail Monty Hall problem
  • 46% misapply regression to causation
  • 63% ignore multiple testing errors
  • 55% survivorship bias unrecognized
  • 78% publication bias inflates effects
  • 34% wrong sample size calculations
  • 61% gambler's fallacy prevalence
  • 47% Texas sharpshooter fallacy use
  • 73% post-hoc fallacy in polls

Statistical Misuse Interpretation

The grim irony of these statistics is that they so perfectly illustrate their own point about rampant statistical illiteracy, making us wonder if we should even trust them.

Sources & References