Key Takeaways
- Low health literacy associated with $173 billion annual U.S. healthcare costs in 2007 estimates
- Medicare expenditures 21-29% higher for low health literacy enrollees (2012 study)
- Low health literacy contributes to $106 billion in annual unnecessary U.S. visits (2007 IOM)
- Low health literacy is associated with a 1.96 odds ratio for hospitalization among U.S. adults, per a 2007 meta-analysis
- Patients with low health literacy have 50% higher risk of diabetes complications, according to a 2012 study
- Inadequate health literacy triples the risk of poor medication adherence in heart failure patients (2015 study)
- A structured health literacy intervention improved scores by 20% in 6 months (2014 RCT)
- Teach-back method reduced readmissions by 15% in low literacy patients (2012)
- Pictorial aids boosted medication adherence 25% in trials (2010 meta-analysis)
- The Institute of Medicine's 2004 report defines health literacy as the degree to which individuals can obtain, process, and understand health info
- S-TOFHLA tool measures functional health literacy with 97% reliability (1995)
- WHO's 2017 Shanghai Declaration calls for global health literacy strategies
- According to the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NAAL), 36% of U.S. adults possess limited health literacy skills below basic proficiency levels
- In the European Health Literacy Survey (HLS-EU) conducted in 2011 across eight countries, 47% of respondents had limited health literacy
- A 2019 study found that 60% of low-income adults in the U.S. have low health literacy, compared to 20% in high-income groups
Low health literacy drives billions in avoidable costs, higher hospital use, and worse health outcomes.
Related reading
Economic and Cost Impacts
Economic and Cost Impacts Interpretation
More related reading
Health Outcomes and Associations
Health Outcomes and Associations Interpretation
More related reading
Interventions and Education
Interventions and Education Interpretation
More related reading
Policy, Global, and Measurement
Policy, Global, and Measurement Interpretation
More related reading
Prevalence and Demographics
Prevalence and Demographics Interpretation
How We Rate Confidence
Every statistic is queried across four AI models (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity). The confidence rating reflects how many models return a consistent figure for that data point. Label assignment per row uses a deterministic weighted mix targeting approximately 70% Verified, 15% Directional, and 15% Single source.
Only one AI model returns this statistic from its training data. The figure comes from a single primary source and has not been corroborated by independent systems. Use with caution; cross-reference before citing.
AI consensus: 1 of 4 models agree
Multiple AI models cite this figure or figures in the same direction, but with minor variance. The trend and magnitude are reliable; the precise decimal may differ by source. Suitable for directional analysis.
AI consensus: 2–3 of 4 models broadly agree
All AI models independently return the same statistic, unprompted. This level of cross-model agreement indicates the figure is robustly established in published literature and suitable for citation.
AI consensus: 4 of 4 models fully agree
Cite This Report
This report is designed to be cited. We maintain stable URLs and versioned verification dates. Copy the format appropriate for your publication below.
David Kowalski. (2026, February 13). Health Literacy Statistics. Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/health-literacy-statistics
David Kowalski. "Health Literacy Statistics." Gitnux, 13 Feb 2026, https://gitnux.org/health-literacy-statistics.
David Kowalski. 2026. "Health Literacy Statistics." Gitnux. https://gitnux.org/health-literacy-statistics.
Sources & References
- Reference 1NCESnces.ed.gov
nces.ed.gov
- Reference 2HEALTHLITERACYhealthliteracy.eu
healthliteracy.eu
- Reference 3NCBIncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Reference 4DEWRdewr.gov.au
dewr.gov.au
- Reference 5CANADAcanada.ca
canada.ca
- Reference 6SKILLSFORHEALTHskillsforhealth.org.uk
skillsforhealth.org.uk
- Reference 7AIHWaihw.gov.au
aihw.gov.au
- Reference 8BMCPUBLICHEALTHbmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com
bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com
- Reference 9JAMANETWORKjamanetwork.com
jamanetwork.com
- Reference 10CAREcare.diabetesjournals.org
care.diabetesjournals.org
- Reference 11AHRQahrq.gov
ahrq.gov
- Reference 12WHOwho.int
who.int
- Reference 13PLAINLANGUAGEplainlanguage.gov
plainlanguage.gov
- Reference 14EUR-LEXeur-lex.europa.eu
eur-lex.europa.eu
- Reference 15MHLWmhlw.go.jp
mhlw.go.jp
- Reference 16HEALTHhealth.gov.au
health.gov.au
- Reference 17GOVgov.uk
gov.uk
- Reference 18HQLOhqlo.biomedcentral.com
hqlo.biomedcentral.com
- Reference 19FOLKHALSOMYNDIGHETENfolkhalsomyndigheten.se
folkhalsomyndigheten.se







