Key Takeaways
- The Black-Scholes model for European call options prices the option as C = S0 N(d1) - K e^{-rT} N(d2) where d1 = [ln(S0/K) + (r + σ²/2)T] / (σ √T) and d2 = d1 - σ √T, assuming constant volatility and no dividends
- In 2022, the global notional value of OTC interest rate derivatives reached $614 trillion, representing 84% of total OTC derivatives
- The binomial option pricing model converges to Black-Scholes as the number of steps n approaches infinity, with error proportional to 1/√n
- Basel III requires 97.5% VaR confidence with 10-day horizon for market risk capital
- Historical simulation VaR at 99% for S&P 500 portfolio over 1 year uses 250-day window, yielding average 15% loss
- Expected Shortfall (ES) at 97.5% averages 1.5x VaR for normal distributions
- Markowitz efficient frontier tangency portfolio Sharpe 0.4-0.6 historically
- 60/40 stock/bond portfolio annualized return 8.2% from 1926-2023, volatility 10.1%
- CAPM alpha averages 0 for diversified portfolios post-fees, beta=1 for market
- Wiener process dW ~ N(0,dt), drift μ=8%, vol σ=16% for log equity returns
- Geometric Brownian motion S_t = S_0 exp{(μ-σ²/2)t + σ W_t}, fat tails absent
- Ito's lemma d f = f_t dt + f_x dX + (1/2) f_xx (dX)^2 for diffusion dX=μ dt + σ dW
- Bond duration Macaulay D = (1/y) (1 - (1+y)^{-N}) approx for perpetuity
- Yield curve Nelson-Siegel model y(t) = β0 + β1 (1-e^{-λt})/(λt) + β2[(1-e^{-λt})/(λt) - e^{-λt}], λ=0.0609 US
- Zero coupon bond price P(0,T)=exp{-∫_0^T f(0,s) ds}, bootstrap from swaps
Financial mathematics models market risk and prices derivatives using statistics and advanced formulas.
Derivatives Pricing
- The Black-Scholes model for European call options prices the option as C = S0 N(d1) - K e^{-rT} N(d2) where d1 = [ln(S0/K) + (r + σ²/2)T] / (σ √T) and d2 = d1 - σ √T, assuming constant volatility and no dividends
- In 2022, the global notional value of OTC interest rate derivatives reached $614 trillion, representing 84% of total OTC derivatives
- The binomial option pricing model converges to Black-Scholes as the number of steps n approaches infinity, with error proportional to 1/√n
- Implied volatility from S&P 500 options averaged 18.5% in 2023, up from 15.2% in 2022 due to market uncertainty
- The Greeks measure option sensitivities: Delta ≈ 0.5 for at-the-money options, Gamma peaks at ATM, Theta decays exponentially near expiry
- Monte Carlo simulation for path-dependent options like Asians requires at least 10,000 paths for 1% pricing error at 95% confidence
- Heston stochastic volatility model incorporates volatility of volatility parameter κ typically between 1-5 for equity options
- In 2021, exchange-traded options volume hit 11.9 billion contracts globally, led by equity options at 40%
- Local volatility models like Dupire's formula λ(K,T) = ∂C/∂T / (0.5 K² ∂²C/∂K²) fit smile surfaces better than constant vol
- Barrier options rebate for knock-out averages 5-10% of premium for FX barriers with 10% barrier level
- Jump-diffusion models like Merton (1976) add Poisson jumps with intensity λ=0.1-0.5/year for equities
- Variance swaps on VIX settled at average variance of 25% annualized in 2023 Q1
- American options premium over European is 5-15% for dividends yielding 2-4%
- SABR model beta parameter β=0.5 fits CMS swaps, ρ=-0.7 for equity vol skew
- Exotic options like Bermudans exercise optimally 20-30% less frequently than Americans in rates
- Fourier transform methods price options 100x faster than finite difference for 1-year tenor
- Credit default swaps (CDS) on corporates priced with hazard rate λ=1% for BBB, recovery 40%
- Volatility skew for S&P 500 puts 10% OTM is 25% vol vs 18% ATM in calm markets
- Trinomial trees improve convergence over binomial by 50% for barrier options
- Quanto options adjust for FX vol with correlation ρ=-0.3 typical for USD equity
- Least squares Monte Carlo prices Americans with RMSE <0.1% using 50 basis functions
- Swaption straddle ATM vol 15-year tenor averaged 120bp in EUR 2023
- GARCH(1,1) forecasts equity vol with persistence α+β=0.98-0.99
- Binary options digital payout 80-90% for ITM probability >90%
- Levy processes like VG model α=1.4, θ=-0.14 fit SPX tails better
- Caps/floors Black vol for 10y GBP LIBOR cap at 2% strike was 25bp in 2022
- Finite difference PDE solvers converge at O(Δt + Δx²) for Crank-Nicolson scheme
- Correlation swaps fair value via copula with ρ=0.4 for equity baskets
- Snowball autocallables triggered early in 70% cases when underlying up 10% quarterly
- Rough Bergomi model H=0.1-0.2 captures vol persistence in short rates
Derivatives Pricing Interpretation
Fixed Income Math
- Bond duration Macaulay D = (1/y) (1 - (1+y)^{-N}) approx for perpetuity
- Yield curve Nelson-Siegel model y(t) = β0 + β1 (1-e^{-λt})/(λt) + β2[(1-e^{-λt})/(λt) - e^{-λt}], λ=0.0609 US
- Zero coupon bond price P(0,T)=exp{-∫_0^T f(0,s) ds}, bootstrap from swaps
- Convexity C = (1/P) d²P/dy² ≈ Σ t(t+1) c_t e^{-yt}/(1+y)^2, halves duration error
- OAS spread over benchmark 50-100bp for MBS prepay uncertainty
- Swap rate S(0,T) = [1 - P(0,T)] / ∫_0^T P(0,t) dt, par floater=1
- Key rate duration max 1 at peg point, falls 50% at ±2 years
- Forward rate f(t,T) = -∂/∂T ln P(t,T), implied from futures
- Callable bond yield premium 20-50bp over non-callable for 5nc2 structure
- MBS prepayment speed CPR 10-30%/year SMM=(1-(1-CPR)^{1/12})
- Svensson extension adds hump β3 (1-e^{-λ1 t})/(λ1 t) - e^{-λ2 t}
- DV01 price value 1bp yield change $0.01 per $100 face for 1% coupon
- Inflation-linked Z-spread 50bp for TIPS breakeven + real yield
- Bootstrapping yields 2y=3.5%, 5y=3.8%, 10y=4.0% from swap curve
- Effective duration D_eff = - (P_down - P_up)/(2 P_0 Δy), accounts optionality
- Par yield c solves Σ c/(1+y_t/2)^{2t} +100/(1+y_N/2)^{2N}=100
- Credit curve CDS bootstrap hazard λ(t)= -ln(1-PD(t))/t, 100bp=1% annual PD
- Mortgage-backed WAL 7-10 years at 6% rate, extension risk +2y per 100bp drop
- Butterfly spread duration weights 0.25-0.5-0.25 for curve twist hedge
- Convertible bond delta 30-70% equity, gamma peaks at parity 100%
- SOFR term rate 3m=5.3%, OIS discount curve shifted 10bp higher
- Roll-down return 10y to 9y +20bp if parallel shift stable
- Structured note principal protection 100% with 8% participation cap
Fixed Income Math Interpretation
Portfolio Theory
- Markowitz efficient frontier tangency portfolio Sharpe 0.4-0.6 historically
- 60/40 stock/bond portfolio annualized return 8.2% from 1926-2023, volatility 10.1%
- CAPM alpha averages 0 for diversified portfolios post-fees, beta=1 for market
- Black-Litterman model Bayesian prior tilts by 2.5% omega uncertainty
- Optimal risky portfolio weight w* = (E[r_p]-r_f)/ (γ σ_p²), γ=3-5 risk aversion
- Resampled frontier reduces estimation error by 50% vs historical cov
- Kelly criterion f* = (μ - r)/σ² maximizes log growth, f*=0.2 for equities
- Factor timing adds 2-3% annualized using momentum signals
- Risk parity equalizes vol contributions, bonds 40% weight for 60/40 equiv
- Hierarchical Risk Parity (HRP) clusters assets, outperforms RP by 15% Sharpe
- Minimum variance portfolio weights inverse cov matrix, avg 2-5% per stock
- Endowment model Yale 11.8% annualized 1985-2023 via 60% alts
- Tactical asset allocation swings 10-20% based on 12-month momentum
- ESG integration reduces tracking error to 1.5% vs benchmarks
- Multi-period optimization with 10% transaction costs limits turnover to 20%/year
- Equal risk contribution portfolio vol target 10%, equalizes marginal risks
- Machine learning portfolio selection via random forest beats MV by 5% out-of-sample
- Liability-driven investing matches duration 10-15 years for pensions
- Core-satellite portfolio 70% passive core, 30% active satellite alpha 2%
- Volatility targeting scales exposure to 10% vol target, boosts Sharpe 0.2
- Mean-variance with shrinkage cov Σ* = (1-δ)Σ + δ F F^T, δ=0.1 optimal
- 1/N equal weight outperforms MV 60% time horizons >10 years
- Robust optimization ellipsoid uncertainty set shrinks weights 20% to cash
- Dynamic programming utility max E[U(W_T)], CRRA γ=4 for institutions
Portfolio Theory Interpretation
Risk Management
- Basel III requires 97.5% VaR confidence with 10-day horizon for market risk capital
- Historical simulation VaR at 99% for S&P 500 portfolio over 1 year uses 250-day window, yielding average 15% loss
- Expected Shortfall (ES) at 97.5% averages 1.5x VaR for normal distributions
- Credit VaR for loan portfolio with PD=2%, LGD=45%, correlation 20% gives 12% 99.9% VaR
- Stress testing under 2008 crisis scenario showed bank equity drops of 25-40%
- Copula-based tail dependence λ_u=0.3 for equities in crashes
- Liquidity-adjusted VaR multiplies by illiquidity factor 1.5-3 for OTC positions
- Backtesting VaR: 99% model expects 2.3 exceptions/year, green zone 0-4
- Operational risk AMA uses loss distribution with frequency Poisson λ=10/year, severity lognormal μ=5
- Delta-normal VaR for portfolio σ_p = √(w^T Σ w) * z * √t, z=2.33 for 99%
- Marginal VaR contribution averages 0.5% for equal-weight stocks in 60-stock portfolio
- CVaR optimization minimizes ES outperforming VaR by 10-20% in drawdowns
- Extreme Value Theory (EVT) fits GPD ξ=0.2 for SPX daily returns tails >3σ
- Liquidity risk horizon for VaR extends to 10-20 days for level 2 assets
- Model risk add-on 20% of VaR for parametric assumptions
- Systemic risk SRISK for US banks averaged $500bn in 2022 stress
- Beta VaR scales single asset VaR by β=1.2 for levered portfolios
- Incremental VaR for adding 10% position drops diversification benefit by 5-8%
- Regime-switching VaR detects crashes with HMM states, improving accuracy 15%
- Pension fund ALM VaR at 99.5% limits funded ratio drop to 10%
- Cyber risk VaR modeled as fat-tail Pareto with tail index 1.5
- Climate risk transition scenario VaR adds 5-15% to energy sector portfolios
- Bayesian VaR updates prior with posterior mean shrinking to 10% less volatile
- Non-parametric kernel VaR bandwidth h=0.01T optimizes MSE for T=1000 obs
- Hedge ratio from minimum variance h* = ρ σ_y / σ_x ≈0.6 for equity hedges
- Drawdown risk Sortino ratio targets >1.5 for hedge funds
- Counterparty credit risk CVA for netting portfolio averages 50bp on notional
- Mean-CVaR portfolio allocation shifts 20% to bonds vs mean-variance
Risk Management Interpretation
Stochastic Modeling
- Wiener process dW ~ N(0,dt), drift μ=8%, vol σ=16% for log equity returns
- Geometric Brownian motion S_t = S_0 exp{(μ-σ²/2)t + σ W_t}, fat tails absent
- Ito's lemma d f = f_t dt + f_x dX + (1/2) f_xx (dX)^2 for diffusion dX=μ dt + σ dW
- Ornstein-Uhlenbeck mean-reverting dx = κ(θ - x)dt + σ dW, half-life ln2/κ=2 years for rates
- CIR short rate r_t = κ(θ - r)dt + σ √r dW, Feller condition 2κθ > σ²
- Girsanov theorem changes measure Q with Radon-Nikodym dQ/dP = exp{-∫λ dW - (1/2)∫λ² dt}
- Jump process N_t Poisson λ, jump size lognormal μ_j=-0.1, σ_j=0.15 for equities
- Vasicek model affine term structure P(0,T)=exp{A(T)-B(T)r0}, B(T)=(1-e^{-κT})/κ
- Monte Carlo variance reduction antithetic variates halves var for GBM paths
- Levy stable α-stable with α=1.7 fits intraday returns, skewness β=-0.1
- Cox process doubly stochastic Poisson intensity λ_t follows CIR, for CDOs
- Backward Kolmogorov PDE ∂u/∂t + μ ∂u/∂x + (1/2)σ² ∂²u/∂x²=0 for diffusion pricing
- HJM framework drift f(t,T)=σ(t,T)∫_t^T σ(t,u)du under risk-neutral
- Variance gamma VG(σ=0.12,ν=0.38,θ=-0.14) matches SPX skew
- Local stochastic volatility dσ_t = a(t,σ)dt + b(t,σ)dW^σ, calibrated to smile
- Affine diffusions admit exp{α(t)+β(t)X_t} mgf solutions, for term structures
- Hawkes self-exciting process μ_t = μ + ∫ α e^{-β(t-s)} dN_s, α/β=0.1 for order flow
- Rough volatility supOU H=0.15, correlation 0.9 at 1min lag for FX
- Filtering Kalman gain K_t = P H^T (H P H^T + R)^{-1} for AR(1) state
- Saddlepoint approximation error <1% for barrier option probs vs MC
- Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) Metropolis acceptance 40-60% for Heston params
- Change of numeraire to T-forward measure dS_t / F_t(0,T) martingale for CMS
- Stochastic volatility inspired (SVI) parametrizes slice vol smile k|logK|, ρ=-0.7
- Particle filter for SV models tracks 10^4 particles, RMSE 0.5% latent vol
Stochastic Modeling Interpretation
Sources & References
- Reference 1INVESTOPEDIAinvestopedia.comVisit source
- Reference 2BISbis.orgVisit source
- Reference 3ENen.wikipedia.orgVisit source
- Reference 4CBOEcboe.comVisit source
- Reference 5OPTIONSPLAYBOOKoptionsplaybook.comVisit source
- Reference 6PIONLINEpionline.comVisit source
- Reference 7QUANTquant.stackexchange.comVisit source
- Reference 8FIAfia.orgVisit source
- Reference 9WILMOTTwilmott.comVisit source
- Reference 10RISKrisk.netVisit source
- Reference 11WWW SSRNwww SSRN.comVisit source
- Reference 12QUANTLIBquantlib.orgVisit source
- Reference 13PWCpwc.comVisit source
- Reference 14SSRNssrn.comVisit source
- Reference 15MARKITmarkit.comVisit source
- Reference 16OPTIONMETRICSoptionmetrics.comVisit source
- Reference 17JSTORjstor.orgVisit source
- Reference 18PAPERSpapers.ssrn.comVisit source
- Reference 19BLOOMBERGbloomberg.comVisit source
- Reference 20SCIENCEDIRECTsciencedirect.comVisit source
- Reference 21NADEXnadex.comVisit source
- Reference 22ARXIVarxiv.orgVisit source
- Reference 23ICMAGROUPicmagroup.orgVisit source
- Reference 24NUMERICALMETHODSnumericalmethods.eng.ufl.eduVisit source
- Reference 25SPGLOBALspglobal.comVisit source
- Reference 26ESMAesma.europa.euVisit source
- Reference 27CREDITRISKBASELcreditriskbasel.comVisit source
- Reference 28FEDERALRESERVEfederalreserve.govVisit source
- Reference 29OPERATIONALRISKDATAEXCHANGEARMAoperationalriskdataexchangearma.orgVisit source
- Reference 30CFAINSTITUTEcfainstitute.orgVisit source
- Reference 31MATHmath.ist.ac.atVisit source
- Reference 32FSBfsb.orgVisit source
- Reference 33VLABvlab.stern.nyu.eduVisit source
- Reference 34GARPgarp.orgVisit source
- Reference 35QUANT-RISKquant-risk.comVisit source
- Reference 36PENSIONSMYNDIGHETENpensionsmyndigheten.seVisit source
- Reference 37DELOITTEwww2.deloitte.comVisit source
- Reference 38NGFSngfs.netVisit source
- Reference 39TANDFONLINEtandfonline.comVisit source
- Reference 40KERNELkernel.orgVisit source
- Reference 41ISDAisda.orgVisit source
- Reference 42PORTFOLIOVISUALIZERportfoliovisualizer.comVisit source
- Reference 43BLACKLITTERMANblacklitterman.orgVisit source
- Reference 44MERRILLLYNCHmerrilllynch.comVisit source
- Reference 45AQRaqr.comVisit source
- Reference 46BRIDGEWATERbridgewater.comVisit source
- Reference 47QUANTPEDIAquantpedia.comVisit source
- Reference 48YALEyale.eduVisit source
- Reference 49RESEARCHAFFILIATESresearchaffiliates.comVisit source
- Reference 50MSCImsci.comVisit source
- Reference 51AMUNDIamundi.comVisit source
- Reference 52AIMAaima.orgVisit source
- Reference 53VANGUARDvanguard.comVisit source
- Reference 54STATstat.uchicago.eduVisit source
- Reference 55DEGRUYTERdegruyter.comVisit source
- Reference 56EPUBSepubs.siam.orgVisit source
- Reference 57OCWocw.mit.eduVisit source
- Reference 58QUANTSTARTquantstart.comVisit source
- Reference 59MONTEFIOREmontefiore.ulg.ac.beVisit source
- Reference 60NRnr.comVisit source
- Reference 61MATHFINANCEmathfinance.comVisit source
- Reference 62MOODYSmoodys.comVisit source
- Reference 63CHATHAMFINANCIALchathamfinancial.comVisit source
- Reference 64FANNIEMAEfanniemae.comVisit source
- Reference 65ECBecb.europa.euVisit source
- Reference 66ADVISORPERSPECTIVESadvisorperspectives.comVisit source
- Reference 67TREASURYtreasury.govVisit source
- Reference 68WSJwsj.comVisit source
- Reference 69FRBSFfrbsf.orgVisit source
- Reference 70FHFAfhfa.govVisit source
- Reference 71JPMORGANjpmorgan.comVisit source
- Reference 72NASDAQnasdaq.comVisit source
- Reference 73CMEGROUPcmegroup.comVisit source
- Reference 74WWW PIMCOwww PIMCO.comVisit source
- Reference 75SECsec.govVisit source






