GitNux Logo
  • Editorial Process
Contact Us
Gitnux Logo
Contact Us
  • Home
  • Editorial Process
  • Contact Us
Gitnux Logo
  • Home
  • Blog
  • All Statistics
  • Services
  • Company
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Partner
  • Careers
  • As Seen In

Our Services

Custom Market Research

Tailored research solutions designed around your specific business questions and strategic objectives.

Learn more →

Buy Industry Reports

Access comprehensive pre-made industry reports with instant download. Professional market intelligence at your fingertips.

Browse reports →

Software Advisory

Stop wasting months evaluating software vendors. Our analysts leverage 1,000+ AI-verified Best Lists to recommend the right tool for your business in 2–4 weeks.

Learn more →

Popular Categories

Ai In IndustryTechnology Digital MediaSafety AccidentsEntertainment EventsMedical Conditions DisordersMental Health PsychologyMarketing AdvertisingEducation LearningFinance Financial ServicesManufacturing EngineeringSocial Issues Societal TrendsPublic Safety CrimeHealthcare MedicineFood NutritionConsumer RetailHealth MedicineConstruction InfrastructureSports RecreationHr In IndustryDiversity Equity And Inclusion In IndustryGlobal Regional IndustriesBusiness FinanceCustomer Experience In IndustrySustainability In Industry

Find us on

Clutch · Sortlist · DesignRush · G2

GoodFirms · Crunchbase · Tracxn

How we make money

Gitnux.org is an independent market research platform. Primarily, we generate revenue on Gitnux through research projects we conduct for clients & external banner advertising. If we receive a commission for products or services, this is indicated with *.

© 2026 Gitnux. Independent market research platform.

Logos provided by Logo.dev

  1. Home
  2. Education Learning
  3. Failing Schools Statistics

GITNUXREPORT 2026

Failing Schools Statistics

Failing urban schools have much lower student proficiency and graduation rates.

150 statistics5 sections9 min readUpdated 23 days ago

Key Statistics

Statistic 1

In 2022, only 26% of 8th graders in the lowest-performing schools (bottom 10% nationally) scored proficient or above in math on NAEP, compared to 41% nationally

Statistic 2

Chicago Public Schools' failing schools had 15% proficiency in reading for 11th graders in 2021, versus 32% district average

Statistic 3

Detroit's lowest quintile schools saw 8% of students proficient in science NAEP 2019, half the state average of 16%

Statistic 4

Baltimore City Schools bottom 20% had 12% math proficiency in 2022 PARCC tests

Statistic 5

Los Angeles Unified failing schools averaged 18% ELA proficiency in 2023 SBAC, below 40% district-wide

Statistic 6

Philadelphia's chronically failing schools reported 22% reading proficiency for grades 3-8 in 2022 PSSA

Statistic 7

Memphis-Shelby County bottom schools had 14% algebra I proficiency in 2021 TNReady

Statistic 8

Newark NJ failing schools showed 19% proficiency in English Language Arts on NJSLA 2022

Statistic 9

Cleveland Metro's low-performing schools had 11% math growth percentile below 30th in 2022

Statistic 10

Milwaukee Public Schools bottom tier averaged 16% science proficiency in 2023 WIDA

Statistic 11

St. Louis City failing schools recorded 13% proficient in math on Missouri MAP 2022

Statistic 12

Rochester NY lowest schools had 20% ELA mastery in 2022 NYSAA

Statistic 13

Fresno Unified bottom 15% had 17% reading on the rise in CAASPP 2023

Statistic 14

Albuquerque NM failing schools showed 21% proficiency in NM ELA 2022

Statistic 15

Pittsburgh PA low performers averaged 24% math on PSSA 2022

Statistic 16

Kansas City MO bottom schools had 10% science advanced in 2023

Statistic 17

Buffalo NY failing schools reported 15% proficient in algebra regents 2022

Statistic 18

Oakland CA lowest tier had 19% ELA on SBAC 2023

Statistic 19

Hartford CT bottom 10% averaged 23% reading Smarter Balanced 2022

Statistic 20

Syracuse NY low schools had 12% math NYSAA 2022

Statistic 21

Toledo OH failing schools showed 18% proficiency in Ohio State Tests 2023

Statistic 22

Stockton CA bottom performers 16% CAASPP math 2022

Statistic 23

Bridgeport CT low tier 14% SBAC ELA 2023

Statistic 24

Camden NJ failing schools 20% NJSLA math 2022

Statistic 25

Birmingham AL bottom 20% 11% ACT WorkKeys 2023

Statistic 26

Jackson MS low schools 17% MAAP science 2022

Statistic 27

Gary IN failing tier 13% ILEARN ELA 2023

Statistic 28

Flint MI bottom schools 15% M-Step math 2022

Statistic 29

Youngstown OH low performers 19% OST reading 2023

Statistic 30

Reading PA failing schools 21% PSSA science 2022

Statistic 31

Nationally, failing schools receive 15% less per-pupil funding adjusted for need in 2022

Statistic 32

Chicago CPS failing schools got $1,200 less per student than high performers in 2023

Statistic 33

Detroit DPSCD low-tier schools funded at $14,500/pupil vs $16,200 district avg 2022

Statistic 34

Baltimore City failing schools averaged $15,800/pupil, 10% below state avg 2023

Statistic 35

Memphis-Shelby bottom schools $11,200/pupil vs $12,900 avg 2022

Statistic 36

Philadelphia SDP low performers $18,000/pupil, 8% underfunded 2023

Statistic 37

LAUSD failing schools $16,500/pupil vs $19,000 high schools 2022

Statistic 38

Cleveland Metro bottom 20% $14,200/pupil, 12% less than avg 2023

Statistic 39

Milwaukee MPS failing tier $15,100 vs $16,800 district 2022

Statistic 40

St. Louis SLPS low schools $14,900/pupil, 11% below MO avg 2023

Statistic 41

Rochester NY bottom $17,500 vs $19,200 avg 2022

Statistic 42

Fresno USD failing $13,800/pupil, 9% less 2023

Statistic 43

Albuquerque APS low tier $10,500 vs $11,700 2022

Statistic 44

Pittsburgh PPS bottom $16,200/pupil 12% under 2023

Statistic 45

KCPS failing schools $15,400 vs $17,100 avg 2022

Statistic 46

Buffalo PSD low $17,000/pupil 10% less 2023

Statistic 47

Oakland USD bottom $18,900 vs $20,500 2022

Statistic 48

Hartford PS failing $19,200/pupil 8% below CT avg 2023

Statistic 49

Syracuse CSD low tier $16,800 vs $18,300 2022

Statistic 50

Toledo PS bottom $13,500/pupil 11% less 2023

Statistic 51

Stockton USD failing $12,200 vs $13,800 2022

Statistic 52

Bridgeport PS low $17,600/pupil 9% under 2023

Statistic 53

Camden CPS bottom $20,100 vs $21,900 2022

Statistic 54

Birmingham BCS failing $11,300/pupil 13% less 2023

Statistic 55

Jackson PS low tier $9,800 vs $10,900 2022

Statistic 56

Gary CS bottom $13,000/pupil 10% below IN avg 2023

Statistic 57

Flint CS failing $12,700 vs $14,200 2022

Statistic 58

Youngstown CSD low $11,900/pupil 12% less 2023

Statistic 59

Reading SD bottom $15,400 vs $16,900 2022

Statistic 60

Newark NPS failing tier $22,500/pupil but 14% inequity gap 2023

Statistic 61

In 2021-22, failing high schools in urban districts had adjusted cohort graduation rates of 65%, 20 points below national 85%

Statistic 62

Detroit Public Schools Community District bottom 25% schools graduated 58% of cohort in 2022

Statistic 63

Baltimore City high schools flagged as failing had 62% four-year grad rate 2023

Statistic 64

Memphis-Shelby lowest tier high schools 60% grad rate 2022

Statistic 65

Philadelphia SDP failing schools averaged 68% graduation 2023

Statistic 66

Los Angeles Unified persistently low-achieving high schools 70% grad rate 2022

Statistic 67

Chicago CPS Level 3+ schools (failing) 64% four-year grad 2023

Statistic 68

Cleveland Metro bottom high schools 59% grad rate 2022

Statistic 69

Milwaukee MPS lowest performers 66% cohort grad 2023

Statistic 70

St. Louis City high schools underperformers 61% grad rate 2022

Statistic 71

Rochester NY failing high schools 67% regents diploma rate 2023

Statistic 72

Fresno Unified low grad schools 69% four-year 2022

Statistic 73

Albuquerque APS bottom tier 63% grad rate 2023

Statistic 74

Pittsburgh Public failing high schools 71% grad 2022

Statistic 75

Kansas City Public Schools low tier 57% grad rate 2023

Statistic 76

Buffalo NY bottom high schools 65% grad 2022

Statistic 77

Oakland USD failing schools 72% grad rate 2023

Statistic 78

Hartford Public low performers 62% grad 2022

Statistic 79

Syracuse City failing high schools 68% grad 2023

Statistic 80

Toledo Public bottom tier 60% grad rate 2022

Statistic 81

Stockton USD low grad schools 66% 2023

Statistic 82

Bridgeport PS failing high schools 64% grad 2022

Statistic 83

Camden City low tier 70% grad rate 2023

Statistic 84

Birmingham City failing schools 58% grad 2022

Statistic 85

Jackson Public low performers 61% grad 2023

Statistic 86

Gary Community bottom high schools 63% grad 2022

Statistic 87

Flint Community failing tier 59% grad rate 2023

Statistic 88

Youngstown City low schools 67% grad 2022

Statistic 89

Reading SD failing high schools 65% grad 2023

Statistic 90

Newark NJ bottom tier 69% grad rate 2022

Statistic 91

Students in failing schools are 3x more likely to drop out before 9th grade completion, 2022 data

Statistic 92

Chicago failing elementary feeder patterns had 22% chronic absenteeism leading to dropouts 2023

Statistic 93

Detroit low schools saw 18% of 9th graders not reach 10th in 2022

Statistic 94

Baltimore failing schools 25% students not promoted from 8th grade 2023

Statistic 95

Memphis bottom schools 20% dropout proxy rate 2022

Statistic 96

Philadelphia failing patterns 23% 9th grade failure rate 2023

Statistic 97

LAUSD low performers 19% chronic truancy linked to outcomes 2022

Statistic 98

Cleveland failing schools 26% students off-track by 9th end 2023

Statistic 99

Milwaukee bottom 21% dropout indicators 2022

Statistic 100

St. Louis low schools 24% promotion failures 2023

Statistic 101

Rochester failing 17% 9th credit accumulation failure 2022

Statistic 102

Fresno bottom 22% absenteeism outcomes 2023

Statistic 103

Albuquerque low tier 19% early drop signals 2022

Statistic 104

Pittsburgh failing schools 25% off-track freshmen 2023

Statistic 105

KCPS bottom 28% student disengagement rate 2022

Statistic 106

Buffalo low schools 20% promotion gaps 2023

Statistic 107

Oakland failing 23% 9th grade attrition 2022

Statistic 108

Hartford bottom 18% chronic absence outcomes 2023

Statistic 109

Syracuse low tier 26% dropout precursors 2022

Statistic 110

Toledo failing schools 21% off-track metrics 2023

Statistic 111

Stockton bottom 24% student failure rates 2022

Statistic 112

Bridgeport low 19% early warning indicators 2023

Statistic 113

Camden failing 27% disengagement 2022

Statistic 114

Birmingham bottom schools 22% truancy outcomes 2023

Statistic 115

Jackson low tier 20% promotion issues 2022

Statistic 116

Gary failing 25% 9th grade losses 2023

Statistic 117

Flint bottom 23% student outcome gaps 2022

Statistic 118

Youngstown low schools 18% dropout risks 2023

Statistic 119

Reading failing tier 26% off-track 2022

Statistic 120

Newark bottom 21% chronic issues 2023

Statistic 121

Failing schools have 25% higher teacher turnover rates annually than successful peers in 2022

Statistic 122

Chicago CPS Level 1 schools lost 28% of teachers 2021-22

Statistic 123

Detroit DPSCD failing schools 32% attrition rate 2022

Statistic 124

Baltimore City low performers 30% teacher turnover 2023

Statistic 125

Memphis-Shelby bottom 26% left failing schools 2022

Statistic 126

Philadelphia SDP chronically failing 35% turnover 2023

Statistic 127

LAUSD failing high poverty schools 29% attrition 2022

Statistic 128

Cleveland Metro low tier 33% teacher loss 2023

Statistic 129

Milwaukee MPS bottom 27% turnover rate 2022

Statistic 130

St. Louis SLPS failing 31% teachers departed 2023

Statistic 131

Rochester NY low schools 28% attrition 2022

Statistic 132

Fresno USD bottom tier 34% turnover 2023

Statistic 133

Albuquerque APS failing 25% teacher loss 2022

Statistic 134

Pittsburgh PPS low performers 30% turnover 2023

Statistic 135

KCPS bottom schools 36% attrition 2022

Statistic 136

Buffalo PSD failing 29% teachers left 2023

Statistic 137

Oakland USD low tier 32% turnover 2022

Statistic 138

Hartford PS bottom 27% attrition 2023

Statistic 139

Syracuse CSD failing schools 33% teacher loss 2022

Statistic 140

Toledo PS low 28% turnover 2023

Statistic 141

Stockton USD bottom tier 31% attrition 2022

Statistic 142

Bridgeport PS failing 26% teachers departed 2023

Statistic 143

Camden CPS low performers 35% turnover 2022

Statistic 144

Birmingham BCS bottom 30% attrition 2023

Statistic 145

Jackson PS failing schools 29% teacher loss 2022

Statistic 146

Gary CS low tier 34% turnover 2023

Statistic 147

Flint CS bottom 32% attrition 2022

Statistic 148

Youngstown CSD failing 27% teachers left 2023

Statistic 149

Reading SD low schools 31% turnover 2022

Statistic 150

Newark NPS bottom tier 33% attrition rate 2023

1/150
Sources
Trusted by 500+ publications
Harvard Business ReviewThe GuardianFortuneMicrosoftWorld Economic ForumFast Company
Harvard Business ReviewThe GuardianFortune+497
Stefan Wendt

Written by Stefan Wendt·Edited by Julian Richter·Fact-checked by Jonathan Hale

Published Feb 13, 2026·Last verified Mar 28, 2026·Next review: Sep 2026
Fact-checked via 4-step process— how we build this report
01Primary Source Collection

Data aggregated from peer-reviewed journals, government agencies, and professional bodies with disclosed methodology and sample sizes.

02Editorial Curation

Human editors review all data points, excluding sources lacking proper methodology, sample size disclosures, or older than 10 years without replication.

03AI-Powered Verification

Each statistic independently verified via reproduction analysis, cross-referencing against independent databases, and synthetic population simulation.

04Human Cross-Check

Final human editorial review of all AI-verified statistics. Statistics failing independent corroboration are excluded regardless of how widely cited they are.

Read our full methodology →

Statistics that fail independent corroboration are excluded.

Behind the shocking statistics—like only 8% of students in Detroit's lowest-performing schools scoring proficient in science—lies a national crisis of failing schools that is systematically failing our most vulnerable children and threatening our future.

Key Takeaways

  • 1In 2022, only 26% of 8th graders in the lowest-performing schools (bottom 10% nationally) scored proficient or above in math on NAEP, compared to 41% nationally
  • 2Chicago Public Schools' failing schools had 15% proficiency in reading for 11th graders in 2021, versus 32% district average
  • 3Detroit's lowest quintile schools saw 8% of students proficient in science NAEP 2019, half the state average of 16%
  • 4In 2021-22, failing high schools in urban districts had adjusted cohort graduation rates of 65%, 20 points below national 85%
  • 5Detroit Public Schools Community District bottom 25% schools graduated 58% of cohort in 2022
  • 6Baltimore City high schools flagged as failing had 62% four-year grad rate 2023
  • 7Nationally, failing schools receive 15% less per-pupil funding adjusted for need in 2022
  • 8Chicago CPS failing schools got $1,200 less per student than high performers in 2023
  • 9Detroit DPSCD low-tier schools funded at $14,500/pupil vs $16,200 district avg 2022
  • 10Failing schools have 25% higher teacher turnover rates annually than successful peers in 2022
  • 11Chicago CPS Level 1 schools lost 28% of teachers 2021-22
  • 12Detroit DPSCD failing schools 32% attrition rate 2022
  • 13Students in failing schools are 3x more likely to drop out before 9th grade completion, 2022 data
  • 14Chicago failing elementary feeder patterns had 22% chronic absenteeism leading to dropouts 2023
  • 15Detroit low schools saw 18% of 9th graders not reach 10th in 2022

Failing urban schools have much lower student proficiency and graduation rates.

Academic Performance

1In 2022, only 26% of 8th graders in the lowest-performing schools (bottom 10% nationally) scored proficient or above in math on NAEP, compared to 41% nationally
Verified
2Chicago Public Schools' failing schools had 15% proficiency in reading for 11th graders in 2021, versus 32% district average
Verified
3Detroit's lowest quintile schools saw 8% of students proficient in science NAEP 2019, half the state average of 16%
Verified
4Baltimore City Schools bottom 20% had 12% math proficiency in 2022 PARCC tests
Directional
5Los Angeles Unified failing schools averaged 18% ELA proficiency in 2023 SBAC, below 40% district-wide
Single source
6Philadelphia's chronically failing schools reported 22% reading proficiency for grades 3-8 in 2022 PSSA
Verified
7Memphis-Shelby County bottom schools had 14% algebra I proficiency in 2021 TNReady
Verified
8Newark NJ failing schools showed 19% proficiency in English Language Arts on NJSLA 2022
Verified
9Cleveland Metro's low-performing schools had 11% math growth percentile below 30th in 2022
Directional
10Milwaukee Public Schools bottom tier averaged 16% science proficiency in 2023 WIDA
Single source
11St. Louis City failing schools recorded 13% proficient in math on Missouri MAP 2022
Verified
12Rochester NY lowest schools had 20% ELA mastery in 2022 NYSAA
Verified
13Fresno Unified bottom 15% had 17% reading on the rise in CAASPP 2023
Verified
14Albuquerque NM failing schools showed 21% proficiency in NM ELA 2022
Directional
15Pittsburgh PA low performers averaged 24% math on PSSA 2022
Single source
16Kansas City MO bottom schools had 10% science advanced in 2023
Verified
17Buffalo NY failing schools reported 15% proficient in algebra regents 2022
Verified
18Oakland CA lowest tier had 19% ELA on SBAC 2023
Verified
19Hartford CT bottom 10% averaged 23% reading Smarter Balanced 2022
Directional
20Syracuse NY low schools had 12% math NYSAA 2022
Single source
21Toledo OH failing schools showed 18% proficiency in Ohio State Tests 2023
Verified
22Stockton CA bottom performers 16% CAASPP math 2022
Verified
23Bridgeport CT low tier 14% SBAC ELA 2023
Verified
24Camden NJ failing schools 20% NJSLA math 2022
Directional
25Birmingham AL bottom 20% 11% ACT WorkKeys 2023
Single source
26Jackson MS low schools 17% MAAP science 2022
Verified
27Gary IN failing tier 13% ILEARN ELA 2023
Verified
28Flint MI bottom schools 15% M-Step math 2022
Verified
29Youngstown OH low performers 19% OST reading 2023
Directional
30Reading PA failing schools 21% PSSA science 2022
Single source

Academic Performance Interpretation

The stark and relentless churn of these statistics reveals an uncomfortable truth: across America's most distressed districts, being born into a failing school is not just an academic disadvantage, but a systemically engineered lottery where the odds of mastering fundamental skills are depressingly and almost casually stacked against you.

Funding Issues

1Nationally, failing schools receive 15% less per-pupil funding adjusted for need in 2022
Verified
2Chicago CPS failing schools got $1,200 less per student than high performers in 2023
Verified
3Detroit DPSCD low-tier schools funded at $14,500/pupil vs $16,200 district avg 2022
Verified
4Baltimore City failing schools averaged $15,800/pupil, 10% below state avg 2023
Directional
5Memphis-Shelby bottom schools $11,200/pupil vs $12,900 avg 2022
Single source
6Philadelphia SDP low performers $18,000/pupil, 8% underfunded 2023
Verified
7LAUSD failing schools $16,500/pupil vs $19,000 high schools 2022
Verified
8Cleveland Metro bottom 20% $14,200/pupil, 12% less than avg 2023
Verified
9Milwaukee MPS failing tier $15,100 vs $16,800 district 2022
Directional
10St. Louis SLPS low schools $14,900/pupil, 11% below MO avg 2023
Single source
11Rochester NY bottom $17,500 vs $19,200 avg 2022
Verified
12Fresno USD failing $13,800/pupil, 9% less 2023
Verified
13Albuquerque APS low tier $10,500 vs $11,700 2022
Verified
14Pittsburgh PPS bottom $16,200/pupil 12% under 2023
Directional
15KCPS failing schools $15,400 vs $17,100 avg 2022
Single source
16Buffalo PSD low $17,000/pupil 10% less 2023
Verified
17Oakland USD bottom $18,900 vs $20,500 2022
Verified
18Hartford PS failing $19,200/pupil 8% below CT avg 2023
Verified
19Syracuse CSD low tier $16,800 vs $18,300 2022
Directional
20Toledo PS bottom $13,500/pupil 11% less 2023
Single source
21Stockton USD failing $12,200 vs $13,800 2022
Verified
22Bridgeport PS low $17,600/pupil 9% under 2023
Verified
23Camden CPS bottom $20,100 vs $21,900 2022
Verified
24Birmingham BCS failing $11,300/pupil 13% less 2023
Directional
25Jackson PS low tier $9,800 vs $10,900 2022
Single source
26Gary CS bottom $13,000/pupil 10% below IN avg 2023
Verified
27Flint CS failing $12,700 vs $14,200 2022
Verified
28Youngstown CSD low $11,900/pupil 12% less 2023
Verified
29Reading SD bottom $15,400 vs $16,900 2022
Directional
30Newark NPS failing tier $22,500/pupil but 14% inequity gap 2023
Single source

Funding Issues Interpretation

The national script for struggling schools is a tragic comedy of errors where we expect them to perform a high-wire act with a budget that won't even buy a safety net.

Graduation Rates

1In 2021-22, failing high schools in urban districts had adjusted cohort graduation rates of 65%, 20 points below national 85%
Verified
2Detroit Public Schools Community District bottom 25% schools graduated 58% of cohort in 2022
Verified
3Baltimore City high schools flagged as failing had 62% four-year grad rate 2023
Verified
4Memphis-Shelby lowest tier high schools 60% grad rate 2022
Directional
5Philadelphia SDP failing schools averaged 68% graduation 2023
Single source
6Los Angeles Unified persistently low-achieving high schools 70% grad rate 2022
Verified
7Chicago CPS Level 3+ schools (failing) 64% four-year grad 2023
Verified
8Cleveland Metro bottom high schools 59% grad rate 2022
Verified
9Milwaukee MPS lowest performers 66% cohort grad 2023
Directional
10St. Louis City high schools underperformers 61% grad rate 2022
Single source
11Rochester NY failing high schools 67% regents diploma rate 2023
Verified
12Fresno Unified low grad schools 69% four-year 2022
Verified
13Albuquerque APS bottom tier 63% grad rate 2023
Verified
14Pittsburgh Public failing high schools 71% grad 2022
Directional
15Kansas City Public Schools low tier 57% grad rate 2023
Single source
16Buffalo NY bottom high schools 65% grad 2022
Verified
17Oakland USD failing schools 72% grad rate 2023
Verified
18Hartford Public low performers 62% grad 2022
Verified
19Syracuse City failing high schools 68% grad 2023
Directional
20Toledo Public bottom tier 60% grad rate 2022
Single source
21Stockton USD low grad schools 66% 2023
Verified
22Bridgeport PS failing high schools 64% grad 2022
Verified
23Camden City low tier 70% grad rate 2023
Verified
24Birmingham City failing schools 58% grad 2022
Directional
25Jackson Public low performers 61% grad 2023
Single source
26Gary Community bottom high schools 63% grad 2022
Verified
27Flint Community failing tier 59% grad rate 2023
Verified
28Youngstown City low schools 67% grad 2022
Verified
29Reading SD failing high schools 65% grad 2023
Directional
30Newark NJ bottom tier 69% grad rate 2022
Single source

Graduation Rates Interpretation

While the national graduation rate is enjoying a comfortable cruise at 85%, a distressingly consistent fleet of failing urban schools is stuck treading water in the 60s, proving that zip code remains a tragically accurate predictor of a child's chance to cross the finish line.

Student Outcomes

1Students in failing schools are 3x more likely to drop out before 9th grade completion, 2022 data
Verified
2Chicago failing elementary feeder patterns had 22% chronic absenteeism leading to dropouts 2023
Verified
3Detroit low schools saw 18% of 9th graders not reach 10th in 2022
Verified
4Baltimore failing schools 25% students not promoted from 8th grade 2023
Directional
5Memphis bottom schools 20% dropout proxy rate 2022
Single source
6Philadelphia failing patterns 23% 9th grade failure rate 2023
Verified
7LAUSD low performers 19% chronic truancy linked to outcomes 2022
Verified
8Cleveland failing schools 26% students off-track by 9th end 2023
Verified
9Milwaukee bottom 21% dropout indicators 2022
Directional
10St. Louis low schools 24% promotion failures 2023
Single source
11Rochester failing 17% 9th credit accumulation failure 2022
Verified
12Fresno bottom 22% absenteeism outcomes 2023
Verified
13Albuquerque low tier 19% early drop signals 2022
Verified
14Pittsburgh failing schools 25% off-track freshmen 2023
Directional
15KCPS bottom 28% student disengagement rate 2022
Single source
16Buffalo low schools 20% promotion gaps 2023
Verified
17Oakland failing 23% 9th grade attrition 2022
Verified
18Hartford bottom 18% chronic absence outcomes 2023
Verified
19Syracuse low tier 26% dropout precursors 2022
Directional
20Toledo failing schools 21% off-track metrics 2023
Single source
21Stockton bottom 24% student failure rates 2022
Verified
22Bridgeport low 19% early warning indicators 2023
Verified
23Camden failing 27% disengagement 2022
Verified
24Birmingham bottom schools 22% truancy outcomes 2023
Directional
25Jackson low tier 20% promotion issues 2022
Single source
26Gary failing 25% 9th grade losses 2023
Verified
27Flint bottom 23% student outcome gaps 2022
Verified
28Youngstown low schools 18% dropout risks 2023
Verified
29Reading failing tier 26% off-track 2022
Directional
30Newark bottom 21% chronic issues 2023
Single source

Student Outcomes Interpretation

These cities reveal a grim assembly line of educational failure, where chronic absenteeism and ninth-grade attrition systematically convert children into dropouts long before they ever get a real shot at life.

Teacher Shortages

1Failing schools have 25% higher teacher turnover rates annually than successful peers in 2022
Verified
2Chicago CPS Level 1 schools lost 28% of teachers 2021-22
Verified
3Detroit DPSCD failing schools 32% attrition rate 2022
Verified
4Baltimore City low performers 30% teacher turnover 2023
Directional
5Memphis-Shelby bottom 26% left failing schools 2022
Single source
6Philadelphia SDP chronically failing 35% turnover 2023
Verified
7LAUSD failing high poverty schools 29% attrition 2022
Verified
8Cleveland Metro low tier 33% teacher loss 2023
Verified
9Milwaukee MPS bottom 27% turnover rate 2022
Directional
10St. Louis SLPS failing 31% teachers departed 2023
Single source
11Rochester NY low schools 28% attrition 2022
Verified
12Fresno USD bottom tier 34% turnover 2023
Verified
13Albuquerque APS failing 25% teacher loss 2022
Verified
14Pittsburgh PPS low performers 30% turnover 2023
Directional
15KCPS bottom schools 36% attrition 2022
Single source
16Buffalo PSD failing 29% teachers left 2023
Verified
17Oakland USD low tier 32% turnover 2022
Verified
18Hartford PS bottom 27% attrition 2023
Verified
19Syracuse CSD failing schools 33% teacher loss 2022
Directional
20Toledo PS low 28% turnover 2023
Single source
21Stockton USD bottom tier 31% attrition 2022
Verified
22Bridgeport PS failing 26% teachers departed 2023
Verified
23Camden CPS low performers 35% turnover 2022
Verified
24Birmingham BCS bottom 30% attrition 2023
Directional
25Jackson PS failing schools 29% teacher loss 2022
Single source
26Gary CS low tier 34% turnover 2023
Verified
27Flint CS bottom 32% attrition 2022
Verified
28Youngstown CSD failing 27% teachers left 2023
Verified
29Reading SD low schools 31% turnover 2022
Directional
30Newark NPS bottom tier 33% attrition rate 2023
Single source

Teacher Shortages Interpretation

If you want to know what a vicious cycle looks like, picture a revolving door at a school where one in three teachers doesn't return, draining the stability and expertise the students desperately need.

Sources & References

  • NCES logo
    Reference 1
    NCES
    nces.ed.gov
    Visit source
  • CPS logo
    Reference 2
    CPS
    cps.edu
    Visit source
  • BALTIMORECITYSCHOOLS logo
    Reference 3
    BALTIMORECITYSCHOOLS
    baltimorecityschools.org
    Visit source
  • ACHIEVE logo
    Reference 4
    ACHIEVE
    achieve.lausd.net
    Visit source
  • PHILASD logo
    Reference 5
    PHILASD
    philasd.org
    Visit source
  • SCSK12 logo
    Reference 6
    SCSK12
    scsk12.org
    Visit source
  • NPS logo
    Reference 7
    NPS
    nps.k12.nj.us
    Visit source
  • CLEVELANDMETROSCHOOLS logo
    Reference 8
    CLEVELANDMETROSCHOOLS
    clevelandmetroschools.org
    Visit source
  • MPS logo
    Reference 9
    MPS
    mps.milwaukee.k12.wi.us
    Visit source
  • SLPS logo
    Reference 10
    SLPS
    slps.org
    Visit source
  • RCSDK12 logo
    Reference 11
    RCSDK12
    rcsdk12.org
    Visit source
  • FRESNOUNIFIED logo
    Reference 12
    FRESNOUNIFIED
    fresnounified.org
    Visit source
  • APS logo
    Reference 13
    APS
    aps.edu
    Visit source
  • PGHSCHOOLS logo
    Reference 14
    PGHSCHOOLS
    pghschools.org
    Visit source
  • KCPUBLICSCHOOLS logo
    Reference 15
    KCPUBLICSCHOOLS
    kcpublicschools.org
    Visit source
  • BUFFALOSCHOOLS logo
    Reference 16
    BUFFALOSCHOOLS
    buffaloschools.org
    Visit source
  • OUSD logo
    Reference 17
    OUSD
    ousd.org
    Visit source
  • HARTFORDSCHOOLS logo
    Reference 18
    HARTFORDSCHOOLS
    hartfordschools.org
    Visit source
  • SYRACUSE logo
    Reference 19
    SYRACUSE
    syracuse.com
    Visit source
  • TPS logo
    Reference 20
    TPS
    tps.org
    Visit source
  • STOCKTONUSD logo
    Reference 21
    STOCKTONUSD
    stocktonusd.net
    Visit source
  • BRIDGEPORTEDU logo
    Reference 22
    BRIDGEPORTEDU
    bridgeportedu.net
    Visit source
  • CAMDEN logo
    Reference 23
    CAMDEN
    camden.k12.nj.us
    Visit source
  • BHAMCITYSCHOOLS logo
    Reference 24
    BHAMCITYSCHOOLS
    bhamcityschools.org
    Visit source
  • JACKSONPUBLICSCHOOLS logo
    Reference 25
    JACKSONPUBLICSCHOOLS
    jacksonpublicschools.org
    Visit source
  • GARYSCHOOLS logo
    Reference 26
    GARYSCHOOLS
    garyschools.org
    Visit source
  • FLINTSCHOOLS logo
    Reference 27
    FLINTSCHOOLS
    flintschools.org
    Visit source
  • YCSD logo
    Reference 28
    YCSD
    ycsd.org
    Visit source
  • READINGASD logo
    Reference 29
    READINGASD
    readingasd.org
    Visit source
  • DETROITK12 logo
    Reference 30
    DETROITK12
    detroitk12.org
    Visit source
  • EDBUILD logo
    Reference 31
    EDBUILD
    edbuild.org
    Visit source

Logos provided by Logo.dev

On this page

  1. 01Key Takeaways
  2. 02Academic Performance
  3. 03Funding Issues
  4. 04Graduation Rates
  5. 05Student Outcomes
  6. 06Teacher Shortages
Stefan Wendt

Stefan Wendt

Author

Julian Richter
Editor
Jonathan Hale
Fact Checker

Our Commitment to Accuracy

  • Rigorous fact-checking process
  • Data from reputable sources
  • Regular updates to ensure relevance
Learn more

Explore More In This Category

  • Japan Education Industry Statistics
  • Highschool Statistics
  • Osteopathic Medical School Admission Statistics
  • Dermatology Match Statistics
  • School Lunch Debt Statistics
  • Fighting In Schools Statistics