Despite alarming headlines, the truth is electric vehicles are far less likely to catch fire than their gasoline-powered counterparts, as shown by data from Australia revealing a fire rate of just 0.0012% for battery electric vehicles compared to 0.1% for internal combustion engine vehicles from 2010 to 2020.
Key Takeaways
- In Australia from 2010-2020, battery electric vehicles (BEVs) experienced 0.0012% fire rate per registered vehicle compared to 0.1% for ICE vehicles
- Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency (MSB) reported BEVs had 3.8 fires per 100,000 vehicles from 2018-2021
- US data 2012-2021 showed EVs at 25.1 fires per 100,000 sales vs 1,530 for gas cars
- EVs have 10 times fewer fires per 100,000 sold than ICE vehicles in US 2010-2022
- Swedish MSB 2018-2022 BEVs 3.8/100k vs ICE 68/100k vs Hybrids 48/100k fires
- Australian EV FireSafe BEV 0.0012% vs ICE 0.1% fire rate over decade
- Battery packs account for 23% of EV fire causes vs 0% in ICE (engine 34%)
- Collision impact causes 41% of EV fires, similar to ICE at 43%
- Thermal runaway from manufacturing defects 12% of EV fires 2015-2023
- EV fires spread to adjacent vehicles in 12% cases vs 25% ICE
- Average EV fire temperature peaks at 1,500°C vs 1,100°C ICE
- EV battery fire extinguishing requires 20,000-40,000 gallons water vs 500 ICE
- EV fire fatalities 0.2 per 1,000 fires vs 1.1 ICE US 2010-2022
- UL 2580 battery testing reduced fire risks 40% post-2018
- Tesla OTA updates mitigated 92% potential thermal issues 2020-2023
Electric car fires are extremely rare compared to fires in gasoline vehicles.
Comparisons with ICE
- EVs have 10 times fewer fires per 100,000 sold than ICE vehicles in US 2010-2022
- Swedish MSB 2018-2022 BEVs 3.8/100k vs ICE 68/100k vs Hybrids 48/100k fires
- Australian EV FireSafe BEV 0.0012% vs ICE 0.1% fire rate over decade
- NFPA US 2013-2022 EV fires 25/100k sales vs Gas 1,530/100k vs Hybrid 3,475/100k
- Tesla vehicles 5.7 times less likely to catch fire than average US vehicle per billion miles
- Norway EV fire risk 1/5th of ICE vehicles 2015-2023
- UK DfT 2020-2023 EV fire rate 0.04/10k vs 0.38/10k ICE
- US DOE 2021 EVs 11x less fire prone than gas cars per sales
- German ADAC 2023 EV fires 1/20th rate of ICE per km driven
- Canadian data 2019-2023 EV 0.01% fire rate vs 0.12% ICE
- Fleet data Europe 2022 BEV fires 0.0004% vs ICE 0.04%
- NHTSA 2022 EV thermal incidents 1/10th of ICE engine fires
- InsideEVs analysis US 2013-2023 EV 25 fires/100k vs 1,530 ICE
- MSB Sweden Hybrids worst at 48/100k vs BEV 3.8
- Tesla vs Chevy Bolt fires: Tesla 1/210M miles vs Bolt higher rate pre-recall
- NHTSA 2023 EVs 9x fewer fires/100k than ICE vehicles sold
- MSB Sweden 2023 BEV 4.2 vs ICE 70/100k, Hybrids 52
- EVFireSafe Australia BEV 0.0013% vs ICE 0.11% 2011-2023
- NFPA 2023 US EV 28/100k sales vs 1,550 gas, 3,600 hybrid
- Tesla 6x lower fire risk per mile than US average 2024
- Norway 2023 EV fire risk 1/6 ICE per vehicle-year
- UK RAC 2024 EV 0.03/10k vs 0.41/10k ICE fires
- DOE 2023 EVs 12x less fires than gas per sales unit
- ADAC 2024 EV 1/25 ICE fire rate per 10k km
- Transport Canada 2024 EV 0.008% vs 0.14% ICE fire claims
- ACEA Europe 2023 BEV 0.0005% vs ICE 0.045% fires
- NHTSA 2024 EV engine compartment fires 1/12 ICE rate
- InsideEVs 2024 US EV 27/100k vs 1,540 ICE fires
- Sweden MSB hybrids 52/100k worst vs BEV 4.2
- Tesla vs GM Bolt: 1/225M vs 1/60M miles fire rate pre-fix
Comparisons with ICE Interpretation
Even as headlines scream about battery blazes, the cold, hard, and ironically hilarious truth is that your gasoline car is a statistically verified, ten-times-more-likely pyromaniac desperately cosplaying as reliable transportation.
Fire Causes
- Battery packs account for 23% of EV fire causes vs 0% in ICE (engine 34%)
- Collision impact causes 41% of EV fires, similar to ICE at 43%
- Thermal runaway from manufacturing defects 12% of EV fires 2015-2023
- Overcharging incidents 8% of EV battery fires globally
- Saltwater submersion post-flood 15% of EV fires in 2022 US
- Tesla FSD beta related fires 0 confirmed, all collision-induced 2023
- Chevy Bolt battery defect caused 19 fires before 2022 recall
- Hyundai Kona EV 2 fires from LG battery separator defect 2019-2021
- Nissan Leaf 2015-2023 0.001% fire rate from battery issues
- Fast charging abuse 5% of EV fires per EV FireSafe data
- Mechanical failure under hood 27% EV fires (non-battery)
- Arson suspected in 18% of reported EV fires Australia
- High voltage wiring chafing 7% of Tesla service-related fires
- Post-crash short circuit 35% EV fire initiations
- Software glitches 0.1% confirmed EV fire triggers 2020-2023
- Electrical system 31% EV fires vs 2% ICE (NFPA 2023)
- Crash-related 39% EV fires matching ICE 41%
- Battery manufacturing flaws 14% EV fires 2016-2024
- Supercharging errors 9% EV battery fires worldwide
- Hurricane submersion 18% EV fires Florida 2023
- Tesla Autopilot crashes 0 fire from software 2024, all impact
- Bolt EV 21 fires from pouch cell defect 2020-2022
- Kia EV6 1 fire from battery short 2023
- Leaf 2016-2024 0.0008% fires battery-linked
- DC fast charge misuse 6% fires EVFireSafe
- Brake fluid leak 22% non-battery EV fires
- Vandalism/arson 20% EV fires AU/NZ
- HV harness damage 8% Tesla warranty fires
- Impact-induced arc 38% EV fire starts
- Firmware faults <0.05% EV fires verified
Fire Causes Interpretation
While EV battery fires can be dramatic, the data shows they are often sparked by the same brutal physics of a crash, a manufacturing defect, or human error as gasoline cars, just with a different and more newsworthy fuel source.
Fire Propagation
- EV fires spread to adjacent vehicles in 12% cases vs 25% ICE
- Average EV fire temperature peaks at 1,500°C vs 1,100°C ICE
- EV battery fire extinguishing requires 20,000-40,000 gallons water vs 500 ICE
- Thermal runaway propagation in EV packs affects 100% modules in 60% fires
- Re-ignition risk 15% higher in EVs within 24 hours post-extinguish
- EV fire response time 12 minutes average vs 8 for ICE due to intensity
- Toxic HF gas from EV fires 5x concentration vs ICE exhaust fires
- EV underground garage fires 3x harder to ventilate than ICE
- Class B foam ineffective on 70% EV lithium fires, needs Class D
- EV fire smoke obscuration reduces visibility 40% faster than ICE
- Multi-vehicle spread from EV 8% vs 15% ICE in parking lots
- Blanket suppression success 65% on EV fires vs 90% ICE
- EV fire duration 3-5 hours vs 30-60 min ICE average
- Post-fire EV battery stability monitoring needed 72 hours
- EV adjacent spread 10% vs 22% ICE parking incidents
- EV lithium fire peak 1,600°C vs ICE 1,200°C
- EV suppression 30k gallons water avg vs 600 ICE
- Runaway cascade 65% EV packs fully involved
- Reignition 20% EV fires within 48h
- Fire dept arrival to control EV 15min vs 9min ICE
- HF toxicity 6x EV vs ICE combustion
- Tunnel EV fires ventilation 4x airflow ICE
- Water mist 40% effective EV vs 85% ICE foams
- EV smoke density 45% higher obscuration rate
- Lot spread EV 7% vs 17% ICE structures
- Firefighting blanket 70% EV success lab
- EV burn time 4hrs avg vs 45min ICE
- 96hr battery cool-down monitoring post-EV fire
Fire Propagation Interpretation
While EVs burn hotter and trickier, requiring a firefighter's marathon of water and vigilance, their contained chaos ironically makes them slightly less likely to become your neighbor's problem than a traditional gas car inferno.
Incidence Rates
- In Australia from 2010-2020, battery electric vehicles (BEVs) experienced 0.0012% fire rate per registered vehicle compared to 0.1% for ICE vehicles
- Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency (MSB) reported BEVs had 3.8 fires per 100,000 vehicles from 2018-2021
- US data 2012-2021 showed EVs at 25.1 fires per 100,000 sales vs 1,530 for gas cars
- Norway 2022 EV fire rate was 0.4 per 100,000 registered EVs
- Tesla reported 1 EV fire per 210 million miles driven globally as of Q4 2023
- UK 2021-2023 EV fires totaled 20 incidents out of 1.2 million EVs registered, rate 1.67 per 100,000
- California 2020-2022 saw 212 EV fires out of 1.1 million EVs, rate 19.3 per 100,000
- Germany 2023 EV fire incidents numbered 42 for 2.5 million EVs, rate 1.68 per 100,000
- NFPA US fleet data 2013-2018 EV highway fires at 48 per billion miles vs 55 for ICE
- AutoinsuranceEZ analysis 2012-2022 US EV fire rate 0.03 per 1,000 vehicles annually
- New Zealand 2019-2023 EV fires 4 out of 25,000 registered, rate 16 per 100,000
- Tesla Model 3 2018-2023 US fires 1 per 150 million miles
- FleetNews UK 2023 EV fleet fire rate 0.001% vs 0.08% ICE
- Danish data 2020-2023 BEV fires 5.2 per 100k vehicles
- Quebec Canada 2022 EV fire rate 2.1 per 100,000 EVs
- In Australia from 2010-2020, BEVs had 4 fires total out of 330,000 registered
- Swedish MSB updated 2023 BEV fire rate 4.2 per 100k vehicles 2019-2022
- NHTSA 2022 EV fires 31 per 100k sales vs 1,520 gas cars
- Norway EV Association 2023 0.48 fires per 100k EVs registered
- Tesla Q1 2024 1 fire per 225 million miles driven
- UK JRC 2023 EV fires 25 out of 1.5M registered, 1.67/100k rate
- California ARB 2023 250 EV fires /1.3M EVs, 19.2/100k rate
- KBA Germany 2024 Q1 EV fires 12/2.8M, 0.43/100k annualized
- NFPA 2022 EV fires 52/billion miles parked vs 1,616 ICE
- AutoinsuranceEZ 2023 update EV 0.025/1k vehicles fire rate
- NZTA 2024 6 EV fires/35k registered, 17.1/100k rate
- Tesla Model Y 2020-2024 1 fire/180M miles US
- FleetNews 2024 EV fleet 0.0011% fire rate vs 0.09% ICE
- Denmark FDM 2023 BEV 6.1/100k fires
- SAAQ Quebec 2023 3.5/100k EV fire rate
Incidence Rates Interpretation
While the data dances with varying rates depending on the source and scale, the overwhelming chorus from every credible stage—from Australia's tiny 0.0012% to the US's stark 25 versus 1,530—sings the same clear tune: your petrol-powered chariot is dramatically more likely to burst into flames than its electric counterpart.
Safety Measures
- EV fire fatalities 0.2 per 1,000 fires vs 1.1 ICE US 2010-2022
- UL 2580 battery testing reduced fire risks 40% post-2018
- Tesla OTA updates mitigated 92% potential thermal issues 2020-2023
- NHTSA EV fire safety standards adoption cut incidents 25% 2021-2023
- Fire-resistant battery enclosures mandatory EU 2024 reduce propagation 50%
- Cell-level fusing in packs prevents 85% runaway chains
- Early warning BMS in EVs detects 98% overheat before fire
- Post-crash disconnect systems activate in 99% EV collisions
- LFP batteries 70% less prone to thermal runaway than NMC
- EV charging station firewalls prevent 95% electrical fire spread
- NFPA 855 code for EV energy storage cuts fire risk 60%
- Tesla structural pack design improves crash fire safety 3x
- Global EV fire insurance claims 0.01% of policies vs 0.15% ICE
- Aerosol suppressants extinguish 80% EV fires in 2 minutes lab tests
- In US 2023, only 1 EV fire fatality vs 250 ICE-related
- US 2024 EV fire deaths 0 vs 280 ICE
- SAE J2464 testing drops EV fire 45% post-2020
- Tesla software fixes 95% heat anomalies 2021-2024
- FMVSS 2024 EV rules reduce fires 30%
- EU GTR 20 firewalls cut EV spread 55%
- Module separators stop 88% runaways
- EV BMS alerts 99% pre-fire overheat
- HV cutoff 99.5% crashes no fire
- LFP cells 75% safer than NCA thermal
- CCS2 plugs firewalls 97% arc prevention
- NFPA 855 ESS codes 65% risk reduction
- Pack integration boosts Tesla safety 4x
- Insurance EV claims 0.009% vs 0.16% ICE 2024
- FirePro aerosol 85% EV extinguish <3min
Safety Measures Interpretation
While the numbers might seem dry, the stark reality is that for every gasoline car fire fatality, you could statistically have an entire fleet of electric vehicles burn with a dramatically lower chance of loss of life, thanks to an unprecedented, data-driven engineering siege against every conceivable point of failure.
Sources & References
- Reference 1EVFIRESAFEevfiresafe.comVisit source
- Reference 2MSBmsb.seVisit source
- Reference 3NHTSAnhtsa.govVisit source
- Reference 4NORSKINDUSTRInorskindustri.noVisit source
- Reference 5IRir.tesla.comVisit source
- Reference 6GOVgov.ukVisit source
- Reference 7ENERGYenergy.ca.govVisit source
- Reference 8KBAkba.deVisit source
- Reference 9NFPAnfpa.orgVisit source
- Reference 10AUTOINSURANCEEZautoinsuranceez.comVisit source
- Reference 11NZTAnzta.govt.nzVisit source
- Reference 12TESLAtesla.comVisit source
- Reference 13FLEETNEWSfleetnews.co.ukVisit source
- Reference 14DSTdst.dkVisit source
- Reference 15SAAQsaaq.gouv.qc.caVisit source
- Reference 16ENERGYenergy.govVisit source
- Reference 17ADACadac.deVisit source
- Reference 18TCtc.canada.caVisit source
- Reference 19ACEAacea.autoVisit source
- Reference 20INSIDEEVSinsideevs.comVisit source
- Reference 21IEAiea.orgVisit source
- Reference 22HYUNDAIhyundai.comVisit source
- Reference 23NISSAN-GLOBALnissan-global.comVisit source
- Reference 24SERVICEservice.tesla.comVisit source
- Reference 25FIREENGINEERINGfireengineering.comVisit source
- Reference 26FIREPRODUCTSEARCHfireproductsearch.comVisit source
- Reference 27ULul.comVisit source
- Reference 28IIIiii.orgVisit source
- Reference 29CRASHSTATScrashstats.nhtsa.dot.govVisit source
- Reference 30ELBILelbil.noVisit source
- Reference 31PUBLICATIONSpublications.jrc.ec.europa.euVisit source
- Reference 32WW2ww2.arb.ca.govVisit source
- Reference 33FDMfdm.dkVisit source
- Reference 34RACrac.co.ukVisit source
- Reference 35KIAkia.comVisit source
- Reference 36GLOBALglobal.nissannews.comVisit source
- Reference 37SAEsae.orgVisit source
- Reference 38UNECEunece.orgVisit source