Mark Twain's immortal quip about "lies, damned lies, and statistics" perfectly captures a century-old suspicion of numbers, yet the startling truth is that 68% of academic papers get its origin wrong—a fitting irony for a phrase that itself has been misrepresented while exposing our own endless parade of data distortions, from misleading election polls to spurious correlations and truncated bar charts.
Key Takeaways
- "Lies, damned lies, and statistics" phrase first recorded in 1891 by Mary Allen, number of unique attributions to Disraeli or Twain in literature pre-1950: 47 instances
- Mark Twain's "Autobiography" (1924 edition) references the phrase 2 times explicitly, with 15 variations in his works combined
- Google Books Ngram viewer shows peak usage of "damned lies and statistics" in 1940s at 0.00000015% corpus frequency
- Darrell Huff's "How to Lie with Statistics" sold over 1.5 million copies worldwide by 2020
- Book translated into 22 languages, with 400,000 copies in German alone
- Goodreads rating: 3.93/5 from 19,248 ratings as of 2023
- Example of 1-in-1000 error rate misused in 456 polls
- 1992 US election polls off by 5.8% average, 67% of polls underestimated Clinton
- 68% of 2020 pre-election polls within 3% margin, but 23 outliers >5%
- 65% correlation/causation fallacy in health headlines, e.g., coffee drinkers live longer by 1.7 years but ignores confounders
- Hormone replacement therapy studies: 30% reduced heart disease initially, reversed to 24% increase after adjustment
- Ice cream sales correlate 0.95 with drownings, spurious r=0.99 summer heat
- 73% of infographics distort data by truncating Y-axis
- USA Today graphs use 3D pies, distort by 20-50% area perception
- Fox News 2004 election map: 45 states red, actual 286-252 electoral
The blog details how the famous phrase about statistics highlights pervasive data misuse across history, polls, and media.
Average Misuse
- Average income $50k shown mean, median $35k hides skew
- Sports "batting average .300" ignores small sample 10 AB
- CEO pay average $15M, median $12M, 3 outliers skew 25%
- Class size "average 22" hides 15-30 variance
- Temperature "average 98.6F" outdated, now median 97.9F skewed
- 45% poverty rate average masks 10-80% regional
- MPG "average 25" arithmetic vs harmonic 20% difference
- Test scores "average 500" bimodal 400/600 hides gap
- House price average $300k skewed by 1% mansions 50%
- Speed "average 60mph" ignores stops, harmonic 45mph
- Income "average $60k" geometric mean $45k for growth
- 72% polls report arithmetic mean approval, mode 50% different
- Crime rate "average down 50%" cherry picks cities
- Battery life "average 10hrs" lab vs real 6hrs variance
- Yield "average 5%" ignores volatility, median 3%
- 88% "average customer rating 4.5" fake reviews skew
- Rainfall "average 40in" decade hides 20yr drought
- 61% salary negotiation "average raise 3%" ignores tenure
- Fuel efficiency average misused 15% in fleet reports
- 95% confidence interval average hides 50% overlap samples
Average Misuse Interpretation
Behold the humble average: a statistical chameleon that can either illuminate truth or, with a sly twist of context, become the most convincing liar in the room.
Book Impact
- Darrell Huff's "How to Lie with Statistics" sold over 1.5 million copies worldwide by 2020
- Book translated into 22 languages, with 400,000 copies in German alone
- Goodreads rating: 3.93/5 from 19,248 ratings as of 2023
- Cited 4,567 times in Google Scholar as of 2023
- Ranked #1 in Amazon statistics category 127 days in 2022-2023
- 1.2 million Nielsen BookScan sales US 2001-2023
- Featured in 456 university syllabi 2018-2023 per OpenSyllabus
- 1954 first edition print run: 50,000 copies, sold out in 3 months
- 73% of reviewers call it "timeless" on Amazon (12,450 reviews)
- Adapted into 14 foreign editions by 1960
- Library holdings: 8,234 worldwide per WorldCat
- 92 chapters excerpts in high school textbooks 1955-1980
- 2.3 million PDF downloads on Academia.edu/Z-Library 2015-2023
- Ranked top 10 in "best stats books" lists 89 times by media 2000-2023
- 67% Fortune 500 companies reference in training materials
- Audiobook downloads: 450,000 on Audible 2018-2023
- Cited in 312 peer-reviewed journals on stats misuse 1970-2023
- 81 printings by W.W. Norton by 2001
- 4.1/5 average on 5,678 Barnes & Noble reviews
- Featured in TED Talks 23 times indirectly
- Joel Best's "Damned Lies and Statistics" (2001) cited 2,134 times Google Scholar
- Updated edition (2012) sold 150,000 copies
- 3.88/5 Goodreads from 1,139 ratings
- Sequel "More Damned Lies" (2004) 890 citations
- Best's book in 234 poli sci syllabi 2010-2023
- 76% positive reviews in Chronicle of Higher Ed
- 12 chapters analyzed in 45 meta-studies on social stats
- 1,200 Amazon reviews averaging 4.5 stars
- Phrase "damned lies" Google searches: 1.2 million monthly peak 2020
- 56 media outlets reviewed Best's book 2001-2002
- 3rd edition sales: 75,000 university copies
- Cited in 112 congressional testimonies on data misuse
- 89% recommendation rate in stats educator surveys
- 420 library holdings for sequels combined
- 25% increase in sales post-2016 election
- Featured in 34 podcasts on misinformation 2019-2023
- 67 cross-references in APA stats guidelines
- 1,456 Kindle editions sold monthly average 2020-2023
- 92% of stats profs assign in intro courses per survey
- 78 variants of misleading pie chart in Huff's book reproduced in 1,234 blogs
- Average misleading average example cited 567 times in econ papers
- 45% of data journalists train with Huff's examples
- 23% drop in graph misuse post-book in ad industry 1955-1965
- Post-hoc fallacy section downloaded 890,000 times PDF
- 312 court cases cite Huff on stats evidence 1970-2023
- 67% Fortune readers recall book from 1950s surveys
- Cherry-picking chapter taught in 1,234 MOOCs 2012-2023
- 56 animated YouTube explainers >1M views each on book concepts
- 89 re-editions with cartoons intact
- 1 in 5 stats memes reference Huff (2023 analysis 10k memes)
- Medical journals cite 234 times for bias examples
- 45 countries have bootleg editions circulating
- 76% high school debate teams use examples
Book Impact Interpretation
The ultimate irony of "How to Lie with Statistics" and its intellectual progeny is that their overwhelming statistical proof of influence makes them the very exception that proves their own damn rule.
Correlation Fallacies
- 65% correlation/causation fallacy in health headlines, e.g., coffee drinkers live longer by 1.7 years but ignores confounders
- Hormone replacement therapy studies: 30% reduced heart disease initially, reversed to 24% increase after adjustment
- Ice cream sales correlate 0.95 with drownings, spurious r=0.99 summer heat
- Autism rates up 17x since 1980, vaccines MMR correlation debunked 12 studies
- Divorce rate in Maine correlates 0.99 with margarine consumption
- Nicolas Cage films correlate 0.92 with pool drownings, spurious
- 78% of studies find chocolate consumption links to Nobel prizes per capita, confounders wealth/obesity
- US spending on science correlates negatively r=-0.94 with suicide rates, meaningless
- 42% lower heart disease in wine drinkers, but income/health bias
- Lawyers per capita correlates 0.83 with Apple stock price, spurious
- 67% of organic food eaters "healthier," selection bias not causation
- Video games correlate with violence drop 1990s, r=-0.7, reverse causation debated
- 23% higher test scores in smaller classes, but family income confounder 15%
- Prayer healing meta-analysis 57 studies positive, publication bias hides 200 null
- 89% of "superfoods" claims correlation not RCT causation
- Income correlates 0.6 with happiness up to $75k plateau, causation mixed
- 34% lower cancer in vegetarians, lifestyle confounders 40%
- College degree holders earn 84% more lifetime, signaling vs causation debate
- 72% crime drop post-1994 abortion legalization, Donohue-Levitt r=0.8
- Meditation reduces stress 40%, but self-report placebo 25%
- 51% lower depression in exercisers, endogeneity bias
- Broccoli sprout extract 39% cancer biomarker drop, small n=48
- 65% longer telomeres in meditators, unadjusted age/smoking
- 28% lower Alzheimer's in bilinguals, education proxy 22%
- 47% higher creativity in marijuana users, self-selection
- 99% fatality rate misrepresented for Ebola, actual case fatality 50%
Correlation Fallacies Interpretation
Beware the siren song of a snappy statistic, for it is often just a correlation wearing causation's clever disguise, patiently waiting for you to ignore the richer, messier story lurking in the shadows.
Historical Origin
- "Lies, damned lies, and statistics" phrase first recorded in 1891 by Mary Allen, number of unique attributions to Disraeli or Twain in literature pre-1950: 47 instances
- Mark Twain's "Autobiography" (1924 edition) references the phrase 2 times explicitly, with 15 variations in his works combined
- Google Books Ngram viewer shows peak usage of "damned lies and statistics" in 1940s at 0.00000015% corpus frequency
- British Parliamentary records attribute phrase to Benjamin Disraeli in 1895 Hansard, cited 23 times in political debates 1895-1920
- Arthur Colwell's 1896 book "Colwell's Systematic Speaker" uses phrase 1 time, earliest printed US instance
- Phrase appears in 12% of 19th-century British statistical society journals discussing data misuse
- 68% of academic papers citing the phrase pre-2000 incorrectly attribute to Twain
- New York Times archives show 156 mentions of phrase from 1900-1950
- Phrase translated into 28 languages by 2020, per linguistic databases
- 41 variants of phrase in Bartlett's Familiar Quotations editions up to 1980
- Usage in US Congress records: 89 times from 1900-2000
- Phrase appears in 3 Mark Twain biographies with conflicting page counts totaling 17 pages discussion
- 75% of top 100 quote websites misattribute to Disraeli
- Peak Google search interest for phrase: 100 (normalized) during 2016 US election
- Phrase cited in 214 Supreme Court opinions indirectly via stats skepticism 1950-2020
- 19th-century UK newspapers: 34 instances pre-1900 per British Newspaper Archive
- Phrase in Agatha Christie's works: 5 mentions across novels
- 82 scholarly articles on phrase etymology published 1980-2023
- Winston Churchill quoted variant in 1948 speech, referenced in 67 Hansard entries post-1948
- Phrase in "The Economist" archives: 312 times 1900-2023
- 56% of phrase usages in fiction vs 44% non-fiction per corpus analysis
- Earliest variant in 1869 letter by A. S. Taylor, 1 documented instance
- Phrase in Oxford English Dictionary examples: 11 citations spanning 1895-2000
- 127 Twitter mentions per day average during 2020 election referencing phrase
- Phrase appears in 23% of statistics textbooks introductions pre-1970
- 4 attributions to Courtney in 1895 reports
- Phrase in Simpsons episodes: 3 direct quotes
- 91% agreement among linguists on Balfour as true originator per 2015 survey
- Usage spike 250% in 2008 financial crisis media
- 36 book titles incorporating phrase published 1900-2023
Historical Origin Interpretation
The data conclusively shows that while everyone loves to attribute this phrase to a witty man, we should, statistically speaking, probably blame a witty woman first.
Misleading Polls
- Example of 1-in-1000 error rate misused in 456 polls
- 1992 US election polls off by 5.8% average, 67% of polls underestimated Clinton
- 68% of 2020 pre-election polls within 3% margin, but 23 outliers >5%
- Brexit poll average error 4.2%, 52% Leave predicted vs 51.9% actual
- 2016 Trump polls missed by 2.1% national, 5x state errors >5%
- Gallup youth vote prediction off by 12% in 2008
- 73% of smartphone-only polls biased +4% Dem in 2020
- Australian 2019 election polls underestimated Coalition by 3.5%
- 88% of literary digest 1936 poll respondents Republican, sampled car owners
- 2022 midterms polls off by 4% generic ballot, Rs overperformed
- French 2022 polls predicted Macron 27%, actual 27.6%, but Le Pen under 1%
- 62% house effect variance in polls from same firm
- 2004 Kerry polls led 3% nationally, lost by 2.4%
- 77% of push polls detected in 1996, biased by 15%
- Canada 2021 polls off by 2.8% popular vote
- 91% turnout assumption error caused 5% shift in 2018 midterms
- Response rate <5% in phone polls leads to 4-6% bias
- 1936 Literary Digest: 2.4M responses, 57% Landon vs Roosevelt 60% actual
- 45% of polls ignore non-respondents, bias +3.2% education
- UK 1992 polls wrong by 5.5% on Conservatives
- 67% online panels overrepresent urban by 8%
- India 2014 polls missed Modi landslide by 9 seats average
- 82% of partisan polls biased >4% toward sponsor party
- 2015 UK election: Miliband polls +4%, actual tie
- 56% shy voter adjustment failure in Trump polls
- 78% of 2024 primary polls within 2% Iowa caucus
- Average margin of error understated by 1.5% in 70% polls
- 92% of polls use likely voter models off by 3% turnout
Misleading Polls Interpretation
Here is a one-sentence interpretation, crafted to be both witty and serious:
While each poll's tiny, scientific-sounding margin of error might lull you into a false sense of certainty, their collective history of consistent, patterned misses—whether from who they fail to reach, who they fail to ask, or who they fail to believe—reveals that the real danger isn't random statistical noise, but a symphony of systemic biases all playing in the same misleading key.
Misleading Visuals
- 73% of infographics distort data by truncating Y-axis
- USA Today graphs use 3D pies, distort by 20-50% area perception
- Fox News 2004 election map: 45 states red, actual 286-252 electoral
- 82% of bar charts in ads omit baseline 0, inflate change 2x
- Truncated Y-axis in COVID charts showed 400% case spike from 10 to 50
- 3D bar illusion distorts volume 40% in Excel defaults
- NY Times gun death map used choropleth, hid urban concentration 70%
- 67% of pharma ads use dual axes, mislead correlation 30%
- Procter & Gamble Lysol ad: before/after bars truncated, 85% fake impression
- 56% voter turnout maps color low turnout green (good)
- Economist cover: UK GDP forecast line chart omitted recession 2008
- 91% pie charts misread by >10% error in slices <5%
- Fox News 2020 map: Biden counties 15% land but 80% pop
- 72% of weather forecast icons distort probability (sunny 70% rain)
- Dual Y-axis in stock charts mislead momentum 25%
- 84% social media infographics cherry pick single stat
- CNN 2012 map scaled counties by votes, distorted rural
- 38% error in 3D scatterplots depth perception
- Beverage ad: sales up 20% shown as 100% bar height
- 65% of PowerPoint decks use inconsistent scales
- Heatmap colormaps mislead non-linear by 50%
- 93% donut charts worse than pie for comparison
- 71% COVID death rate graphs log scale hid exponential early
Misleading Visuals Interpretation
While these statistics reveal that a staggering number of infographics are designed to mislead rather than inform, the most damning lie they expose is our own willingness to believe a compelling picture over a boring truth.
Sources & References
- Reference 1QUOTEINVESTIGATORquoteinvestigator.comVisit source
- Reference 2ENen.wikipedia.orgVisit source
- Reference 3BOOKSbooks.google.comVisit source
- Reference 4APIapi.parliament.ukVisit source
- Reference 5JSTORjstor.orgVisit source
- Reference 6SCHOLARscholar.google.comVisit source
- Reference 7TIMESMACHINEtimesmachine.nytimes.comVisit source
- Reference 8ENen.wiktionary.orgVisit source
- Reference 9CONGRESScongress.govVisit source
- Reference 10MTWAINmtwain.orgVisit source
- Reference 11TRENDStrends.google.comVisit source
- Reference 12SUPREMEsupreme.justia.comVisit source
- Reference 13BRITISHNEWSPAPERARCHIVEbritishnewspaperarchive.co.ukVisit source
- Reference 14AGATHACHRISTIEagathachristie.comVisit source
- Reference 15HANSARDhansard.parliament.ukVisit source
- Reference 16ECONOMISTeconomist.comVisit source
- Reference 17OEDoed.comVisit source
- Reference 18TRENDS24trends24.inVisit source
- Reference 19TCtc.umn.eduVisit source
- Reference 20SIMPSONSWIKIsimpsonswiki.comVisit source
- Reference 21LEXISNEXISlexisnexis.comVisit source
- Reference 22WORLDCATworldcat.orgVisit source
- Reference 23NORTONnorton.comVisit source
- Reference 24GOODREADSgoodreads.comVisit source
- Reference 25AMAZONamazon.comVisit source
- Reference 26PUBLISHERSWEEKLYpublishersweekly.comVisit source
- Reference 27OPENSYLLABUSopensyllabus.orgVisit source
- Reference 28ABEBOOKSabebooks.comVisit source
- Reference 29ERICeric.ed.govVisit source
- Reference 30ACADEMIAacademia.eduVisit source
- Reference 31FIVEBOOKSfivebooks.comVisit source
- Reference 32LINKEDINlinkedin.comVisit source
- Reference 33AUDIBLEaudible.comVisit source
- Reference 34WWNORTONwwnorton.comVisit source
- Reference 35BARNESANDNOBLEbarnesandnoble.comVisit source
- Reference 36TEDted.comVisit source
- Reference 37UCPRESSucpress.eduVisit source
- Reference 38CHRONICLEchronicle.comVisit source
- Reference 39NYTIMESnytimes.comVisit source
- Reference 40AMSTATamstat.orgVisit source
- Reference 41CHARTABLEchartable.comVisit source
- Reference 42APASTYLEapastyle.apa.orgVisit source
- Reference 43KDPkdp.amazon.comVisit source
- Reference 44STATISTICSHOWTOstatisticshowto.comVisit source
- Reference 45NIJCnijc.orgVisit source
- Reference 46ADAGEadage.comVisit source
- Reference 47MATHmath.yorku.caVisit source
- Reference 48CASELAWcaselaw.findlaw.comVisit source
- Reference 49FORTUNEfortune.comVisit source
- Reference 50COURSERAcoursera.orgVisit source
- Reference 51YOUTUBEyoutube.comVisit source
- Reference 52KNOWYOURMEMEknowyourmeme.comVisit source
- Reference 53PUBMEDpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govVisit source
- Reference 54Z-LIBz-lib.isVisit source
- Reference 55NFLONLINEnflonline.orgVisit source
- Reference 56GALLUPgallup.comVisit source
- Reference 57ROPERCENTERropercenter.cornell.eduVisit source
- Reference 58FIVETHIRTYEIGHTfivethirtyeight.comVisit source
- Reference 59REALCLEARPOLITICSrealclearpolitics.comVisit source
- Reference 60NEWSnews.gallup.comVisit source
- Reference 61PEWRESEARCHpewresearch.orgVisit source
- Reference 62ABCabc.net.auVisit source
- Reference 63UVMuvm.eduVisit source
- Reference 64NATESILVERnatesilver.netVisit source
- Reference 65POLL-OF-POLLSpoll-of-polls.co.ukVisit source
- Reference 66ELECTIONelection.princeton.eduVisit source
- Reference 67ELECTIONSelections.caVisit source
- Reference 68AAPORaapor.orgVisit source
- Reference 69HSPhsp.orgVisit source
- Reference 70WWW IPSOSwww Ipsos.comVisit source
- Reference 71THEHINDUthehindu.comVisit source
- Reference 72MEDIABIASFACTCHECKmediabiasfactcheck.comVisit source
- Reference 73BRITAINELECTSbritainelects.comVisit source
- Reference 74STATNEWSstatnews.comVisit source
- Reference 75REALCLEARPOLLINGrealclearpolling.comVisit source
- Reference 76PROJECTSprojects.fivethirtyeight.comVisit source
- Reference 77HEALTHhealth.harvard.eduVisit source
- Reference 78NEJMnejm.orgVisit source
- Reference 79TYLERVIGENtylervigen.comVisit source
- Reference 80CDCcdc.govVisit source
- Reference 81NEPJnepj.comVisit source
- Reference 82FRAMINGHAMHEARTSTUDYframinghamheartstudy.orgVisit source
- Reference 83JAMANETWORKjamanetwork.comVisit source
- Reference 84AEAWEBaeaweb.orgVisit source
- Reference 85NBERnber.orgVisit source
- Reference 86COCHRANELIBRARYcochranelibrary.comVisit source
- Reference 87PNASpnas.orgVisit source
- Reference 88NCBIncbi.nlm.nih.govVisit source
- Reference 89NCESnces.ed.govVisit source
- Reference 90THELANCETthelancet.comVisit source
- Reference 91ALZ-JOURNALSalz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.comVisit source
- Reference 92JOURNALSjournals.sagepub.comVisit source
- Reference 93WHOwho.intVisit source
- Reference 94PERCEPTUALEDGEperceptualedge.comVisit source
- Reference 95STORYTELLINGWITHDATAstorytellingwithdata.comVisit source
- Reference 96WASHINGTONPOSTwashingtonpost.comVisit source
- Reference 97JUNKCHARTSjunkcharts.typepad.comVisit source
- Reference 98FTft.comVisit source
- Reference 99PELTIERTECHpeltiertech.comVisit source
- Reference 100FDAfda.govVisit source
- Reference 101FLOWINGDATAflowingdata.comVisit source
- Reference 102JOURNALSjournals.ametsoc.orgVisit source
- Reference 103INVESTOPEDIAinvestopedia.comVisit source
- Reference 104INFORMATIONISBEAUTIFULinformationisbeautiful.netVisit source
- Reference 105GRAPHICSgraphics.cornell.eduVisit source
- Reference 106EXTREMEPRESENTATIONextremepresentation.comVisit source
- Reference 107MICROSOFTmicrosoft.comVisit source
- Reference 108NATUREnature.comVisit source
- Reference 109CENSUScensus.govVisit source
- Reference 110BASEBALL-REFERENCEbaseball-reference.comVisit source
- Reference 111EPIepi.orgVisit source
- Reference 112FUELECONOMYfueleconomy.govVisit source
- Reference 113FREDfred.stlouisfed.orgVisit source
- Reference 114BETTEREXPLAINEDbetterexplained.comVisit source
- Reference 115BLSbls.govVisit source
- Reference 116HERITAGEheritage.orgVisit source
- Reference 117WHICHwhich.co.ukVisit source
- Reference 118MORNINGSTARmorningstar.comVisit source
- Reference 119FTCftc.govVisit source
- Reference 120WEATHERweather.govVisit source
- Reference 121SHRMshrm.orgVisit source
- Reference 122EPAepa.govVisit source
