GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Cybersecurity Information SecurityTop 10 Best Ztna Software of 2026
Discover top Ztna software solutions.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Cloudflare Zero Trust
Cloudflare Tunnel with Access policies blocks direct origin exposure while enforcing identity at the edge
Built for enterprises standardizing identity-aware ZTNA with private app connectivity.
Zscaler Private Access
Device and identity-aware app access policies enforced through Zscaler service edge
Built for enterprises standardizing secure app access for remote users and branch offices.
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Prisma Access ZTNA policy enforcement using identity and device posture at the service edge
Built for enterprises standardizing on Palo Alto Networks needing ZTNA for private apps.
Comparison Table
This comparison table evaluates ZTNA software options used to broker secure access to private apps, including Cloudflare Zero Trust, Zscaler Private Access, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Microsoft Entra Private Access, and Okta Workforce Identity Cloud. Side-by-side rows focus on core capabilities such as access control, integration with identity and device signals, traffic inspection and tunneling behavior, deployment models, and administrative workflows. The goal is to help teams match each product to ZTNA requirements for users, applications, and network segments.
| # | Tool | Category | Overall | Features | Ease of Use | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cloudflare Zero Trust Provides Zero Trust access with identity-aware policies, device checks, and gated access to apps using ZTNA and WARP client connectivity. | enterprise ZTNA | 8.6/10 | 8.9/10 | 8.0/10 | 8.8/10 |
| 2 | Zscaler Private Access Delivers identity-based ZTNA access to private applications with service edge enforcement, segmentation, and policy controls. | ZTNA platform | 8.3/10 | 8.8/10 | 7.9/10 | 8.2/10 |
| 3 | Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access Enables secure ZTNA-style application access by combining policy enforcement with private connectivity for users and branches. | network security ZTNA | 8.4/10 | 8.7/10 | 7.9/10 | 8.4/10 |
| 4 | Microsoft Entra Private Access Offers Zero Trust private application access using Entra identity signals and per-app policies routed through private connectivity. | identity ZTNA | 7.6/10 | 8.1/10 | 7.4/10 | 7.0/10 |
| 5 | Okta Workforce Identity Cloud with ZTNA Provides identity-driven ZTNA access controls that use Okta authentication and policy to authorize application sessions. | identity-driven | 8.0/10 | 8.5/10 | 7.8/10 | 7.6/10 |
| 6 | BeyondTrust Remote Support and Privileged Access workflows for ZTNA Uses privileged access and secure connection mechanisms to control and broker authenticated access to internal systems with session protections. | privileged access ZTNA | 8.1/10 | 8.6/10 | 7.8/10 | 7.9/10 |
| 7 | Nord Security ZTNA Delivers ZTNA access using policy-based controls and secure client-to-private-service connections. | ZTNA gateway | 7.9/10 | 8.3/10 | 7.6/10 | 7.7/10 |
| 8 | Cato Networks SASE with ZTNA Provides ZTNA-style private application connectivity inside its SASE policy fabric with identity and traffic policy enforcement. | SASE ZTNA | 8.1/10 | 8.6/10 | 7.7/10 | 7.8/10 |
| 9 | Ivanti Secure Access Combines access control with secure tunneling and policy enforcement to restrict user access to internal applications. | enterprise access | 7.7/10 | 8.0/10 | 7.2/10 | 7.7/10 |
| 10 | SailPoint Identity Security with ZTNA integrations Strengthens ZTNA authorization by managing identity governance and access entitlements that feed policy decisions for application access. | identity governance | 7.6/10 | 8.3/10 | 6.9/10 | 7.3/10 |
Provides Zero Trust access with identity-aware policies, device checks, and gated access to apps using ZTNA and WARP client connectivity.
Delivers identity-based ZTNA access to private applications with service edge enforcement, segmentation, and policy controls.
Enables secure ZTNA-style application access by combining policy enforcement with private connectivity for users and branches.
Offers Zero Trust private application access using Entra identity signals and per-app policies routed through private connectivity.
Provides identity-driven ZTNA access controls that use Okta authentication and policy to authorize application sessions.
Uses privileged access and secure connection mechanisms to control and broker authenticated access to internal systems with session protections.
Delivers ZTNA access using policy-based controls and secure client-to-private-service connections.
Provides ZTNA-style private application connectivity inside its SASE policy fabric with identity and traffic policy enforcement.
Combines access control with secure tunneling and policy enforcement to restrict user access to internal applications.
Strengthens ZTNA authorization by managing identity governance and access entitlements that feed policy decisions for application access.
Cloudflare Zero Trust
enterprise ZTNAProvides Zero Trust access with identity-aware policies, device checks, and gated access to apps using ZTNA and WARP client connectivity.
Cloudflare Tunnel with Access policies blocks direct origin exposure while enforcing identity at the edge
Cloudflare Zero Trust stands out by combining ZTNA access controls with edge-enforced security using Cloudflare’s network as the enforcement point. It delivers identity-aware access for applications through Access policies, device posture checks, and optional MFA tied to supported identity providers. It also supports private application connectivity via Cloudflare Tunnel so backends do not require public exposure. Organizations can extend controls with service tokens, browser-based app access, and integration with logging and security analytics.
Pros
- Identity-aware ZTNA policies enforce access at the edge per user and app
- Cloudflare Tunnel enables private apps without exposing origins to the internet
- Device posture checks add risk-based gating using managed endpoint signals
- Granular policy conditions support groups, headers, geo, and session context
- Centralized logs and audit trails simplify incident review and compliance
Cons
- Complex multi-policy environments can require careful design and testing
- Deep device posture setup can be operationally heavy for smaller teams
Best For
Enterprises standardizing identity-aware ZTNA with private app connectivity
Zscaler Private Access
ZTNA platformDelivers identity-based ZTNA access to private applications with service edge enforcement, segmentation, and policy controls.
Device and identity-aware app access policies enforced through Zscaler service edge
Zscaler Private Access stands out with a cloud-delivered ZTNA model that brokers access to private apps without exposing them on the public internet. It centralizes policy enforcement through Zscaler’s client connectivity, service edge, and traffic steering for app-level access decisions. Core capabilities include per-app access policies, identity and posture driven controls, and integration with common identity directories. It also supports logging and session visibility that helps teams troubleshoot access attempts across locations and networks.
Pros
- Cloud ZTNA broker reduces direct exposure of internal applications
- Granular per-app policies based on identity and device signals
- Centralized traffic control supports consistent enforcement across sites
Cons
- Onboarding requires careful app connectors and policy mapping
- Advanced posture and policy tuning can be time consuming
- Troubleshooting multi-hop sessions can require deep Zscaler knowledge
Best For
Enterprises standardizing secure app access for remote users and branch offices
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
network security ZTNAEnables secure ZTNA-style application access by combining policy enforcement with private connectivity for users and branches.
Prisma Access ZTNA policy enforcement using identity and device posture at the service edge
Prisma Access delivers ZTNA capabilities through policy-driven access to private apps and cloud services using the same security fabric as Palo Alto Networks security tooling. It integrates with GlobalProtect-style client access and supports per-app and per-user access controls enforced at the service edge. ZTNA policy decisions can include identity signals, device posture, and threat telemetry to reduce lateral movement risk. Deployment is strongest for organizations standardizing on Palo Alto Networks for identity, endpoint security, and network threat prevention.
Pros
- Policy enforcement at the Prisma Access edge with identity and posture checks
- App-centric access controls for private and cloud-hosted resources
- Strong integration with Palo Alto Networks security and threat telemetry sources
- Scales across regions using a centralized policy model
Cons
- Ztna policy design depends heavily on correct identity and posture data sources
- Complex deployments can require multiple supporting components and tuning
- Less flexible for teams avoiding Palo Alto Networks tooling in the security stack
Best For
Enterprises standardizing on Palo Alto Networks needing ZTNA for private apps
Microsoft Entra Private Access
identity ZTNAOffers Zero Trust private application access using Entra identity signals and per-app policies routed through private connectivity.
Device-based access control using Entra posture signals with private app connectors
Microsoft Entra Private Access stands out for routing internal app traffic through Entra identity controls and a browser-based or client-mediated access path. The service integrates with Entra ID and supports device posture checks so access decisions can include user and endpoint signals. It also uses private application connectors to reach on-premises and private cloud resources while keeping those resources non-public. ZTNA capabilities focus on least-privilege access to specific apps and destinations with policy-driven authentication.
Pros
- Deep integration with Entra ID for identity-first ZTNA policies
- Endpoint posture signals can be incorporated into access decisions
- Connector-based access keeps private apps off the public internet
- Browser and client access options reduce the need for VPN exposure
Cons
- Connector and network placement can complicate initial rollout
- Ztna policy modeling still requires careful mapping of apps and roles
- Advanced use cases may depend on broader Entra architecture choices
Best For
Enterprises standardizing on Entra ID for identity and device-driven access
Okta Workforce Identity Cloud with ZTNA
identity-drivenProvides identity-driven ZTNA access controls that use Okta authentication and policy to authorize application sessions.
Okta ZTNA uses policy-based, device-aware access tied to Okta identity
Okta Workforce Identity Cloud with ZTNA distinguishes itself by combining identity-first access control with Okta’s device posture and application access policies. It centers ZTNA on authenticated, continuously verified access to internal apps through Okta, reducing reliance on network-level exposure. Core capabilities include policy-based access, strong identity integration, and management workflows that connect users, devices, and applications in one control plane.
Pros
- Tight integration with workforce identity and SSO reduces ZTNA policy sprawl
- Device posture inputs support risk-aware access decisions for internal apps
- Centralized policy management aligns application access with identity governance
Cons
- ZTNA effectiveness depends on correct device and app integration coverage
- Advanced segmentation often requires careful policy design and testing
- Complex enterprise topologies can increase operational overhead
Best For
Enterprises standardizing identity and device-based access for many internal applications
BeyondTrust Remote Support and Privileged Access workflows for ZTNA
privileged access ZTNAUses privileged access and secure connection mechanisms to control and broker authenticated access to internal systems with session protections.
Monitored remote support sessions tied to Privileged Access workflow policy controls
BeyondTrust Remote Support and Privileged Access workflows connect help desk remote sessions with privileged access controls to support ZTNA-style access patterns. The solution focuses on monitored remote technician sessions, policy-driven privileged workflows, and session visibility that can be used to minimize broad network reach. It supports identity- and role-based access workflows and pairs remote support delivery with controls for privileged credentials and task execution. The strongest distinction is the workflow tie-in between remote support operations and privileged access governance for ZTNA use cases.
Pros
- Workflow-linked remote support and privileged access reduces ZTNA operational gaps
- Session monitoring and recording improve investigation and compliance evidence quality
- Policy-driven access controls align technician actions with least-privilege goals
- Granular privilege workflows support controlled remediation and admin task execution
Cons
- ZTNA integrations require careful design around identity, device posture, and routing
- Admin configuration for workflows and policies can take time to standardize
- Remote support tooling depth may overwhelm teams using only basic break-fix support
Best For
Enterprises standardizing technician remote support with privileged access governance
Nord Security ZTNA
ZTNA gatewayDelivers ZTNA access using policy-based controls and secure client-to-private-service connections.
ZTNA broker with centralized, identity-driven access policies for protected applications
Nord Security ZTNA centers on user-to-app access with granular policy enforcement backed by strong identity integration. It supports secure, policy-driven access paths for internal applications using its ZTNA broker and routing model. The solution emphasizes visibility and control through centralized access policies and session handling for protected services.
Pros
- Policy-driven access to internal apps through centralized ZTNA control
- Strong identity alignment supports consistent user and device authorization
- Broker-based routing reduces direct exposure of internal services
Cons
- Onboarding can be complex due to app connectors and policy mapping
- Deep troubleshooting requires understanding broker and session flows
- Advanced segmentation depends on well-maintained identity and device attributes
Best For
Teams needing identity-based ZTNA access for multiple internal applications
Cato Networks SASE with ZTNA
SASE ZTNAProvides ZTNA-style private application connectivity inside its SASE policy fabric with identity and traffic policy enforcement.
Cato ZTNA uses application-level access policies enforced at the global edge
Cato Networks SASE stands out for delivering ZTNA through an integrated network fabric that routes traffic from a global edge to internal applications. The ZTNA service enforces access per user and device posture, and it controls north-south connectivity without requiring inbound exposure to internal networks. It pairs application access policy with Cato’s managed connectivity so remote users, sites, and applications follow consistent security controls. The solution is best known for converging ZTNA with secure networking and threat controls in one operational plane.
Pros
- ZTNA policy ties user and device identity to application access decisions
- Global Cato edge routing reduces exposure of internal networks to the internet
- Unified SASE operations simplify aligning ZTNA controls with secure network enforcement
- Application segmentation is implemented through policy rather than network redesign
- Centralized management supports consistent ZTNA enforcement across users and locations
Cons
- Advanced segmentation can require careful policy modeling to avoid over-permission
- Tuning posture and application access across many devices increases administration workload
- Deep custom network workflows may be limited compared with fully custom ZTNA architectures
Best For
Organizations modernizing remote access with policy-driven ZTNA in a unified SASE stack
Ivanti Secure Access
enterprise accessCombines access control with secure tunneling and policy enforcement to restrict user access to internal applications.
Device posture and identity-based access policy enforcement in the Secure Access gateway
Ivanti Secure Access focuses on ZTNA-style access control that routes users to specific apps instead of exposing broad network entry. It combines policy enforcement with identity and device trust checks to gate connections to protected resources. The product’s strength centers on integrating secure access policies into an existing enterprise network and authentication stack. It is best viewed as a connectivity and access gateway layer that enforces who can reach which applications and over what conditions.
Pros
- Application-level access controls with policy-driven routing
- Strong identity and device trust checks for connection decisions
- Centralized gateway architecture simplifies consistent enforcement
Cons
- Policy design and troubleshooting can be complex at scale
- Integration setup depends heavily on existing IAM and network design
- Limited evidence of consumer-friendly administration workflows
Best For
Enterprises securing internal apps with identity and device-aware ZTNA policies
SailPoint Identity Security with ZTNA integrations
identity governanceStrengthens ZTNA authorization by managing identity governance and access entitlements that feed policy decisions for application access.
Access request and certification workflows that enforce least-privilege signals for ZTNA policies
SailPoint Identity Security stands out for identity governance depth paired with strong integration into access-control workflows. It can coordinate ZTNA posture using identity signals and policy decisions so applications and sessions align with verified user context. Its core capabilities include identity governance, access request and certification workflows, and continuous control enforcement through connected systems. For ZTNA deployments, it is best used when identity authority and access policy automation must stay consistent across directories, SaaS apps, and private application resources.
Pros
- Strong identity governance workflows that feed ZTNA policy decisions.
- Broad connector coverage for identities, SaaS apps, and enterprise systems.
- Continuous recertification support helps keep ZTNA access aligned over time.
Cons
- ZTNA value depends on careful policy mapping and data quality design.
- Workflow tuning and integration effort can be heavy for complex environments.
- Operational visibility into ZTNA outcomes may require extra configuration.
Best For
Enterprises needing identity-governed ZTNA access across SaaS and private apps
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 cybersecurity information security, Cloudflare Zero Trust stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Ztna Software
This buyer’s guide explains how to choose Ztna Software by mapping decision criteria to concrete capabilities across Cloudflare Zero Trust, Zscaler Private Access, Prisma Access, Microsoft Entra Private Access, Okta Workforce Identity Cloud with ZTNA, BeyondTrust Remote Support and Privileged Access workflows, Nord Security ZTNA, Cato Networks SASE with ZTNA, Ivanti Secure Access, and SailPoint Identity Security with ZTNA integrations. It focuses on identity-aware and device-aware access policies, private application connectivity, operational fit, and troubleshooting visibility. Each section ties recommendations to specific tool behaviors like edge-enforced policy, brokered routing, and posture-driven gating.
What Is Ztna Software?
Ztna Software delivers least-privilege application access by enforcing who can reach which apps through identity and device trust signals instead of broad network entry. It solves the problem of exposing internal apps to the public internet by routing traffic through a policy-enforcement service edge, such as Cloudflare Zero Trust using Cloudflare Tunnel and Access policies or Zscaler Private Access using service edge enforcement. Many deployments also require app-level connectors and access policy modeling to map users, devices, and applications to specific authorization outcomes, which shows up in setups like Prisma Access and Microsoft Entra Private Access. Teams typically use ZTna Software for remote access, branch-office access, and privileged or technician workflows that must stay tightly controlled.
Key Features to Look For
The strongest Ztna results come from features that enforce policy at the service edge and keep private apps non-public.
Edge-enforced identity-aware and device-aware access policies
Identity-aware ZTNA policies that enforce at the edge prevent unauthorized users from reaching protected apps, as seen with Cloudflare Zero Trust Access policies and Zscaler Private Access per-app controls. Device posture checks that gate access using managed endpoint signals matter for risk-based authorization, as demonstrated by Cloudflare Zero Trust and Prisma Access.
Private application connectivity that avoids public origin exposure
Private connectivity features keep internal services off the public internet by brokering access through a connector or tunnel. Cloudflare Zero Trust uses Cloudflare Tunnel so backends do not require public exposure, while Zscaler Private Access and Microsoft Entra Private Access use private application connectors to keep apps non-public.
Per-application policy controls with granular conditions
Granular policy conditions enable app-specific authorization rules that reduce over-permission. Cloudflare Zero Trust supports granular policy conditions that can include group membership, geo, headers, and session context, while Cato Networks SASE with ZTNA enforces application-level access policies in its global edge fabric.
Consistent policy enforcement across locations via centralized steering
Centralized enforcement reduces drift between users on home networks, offices, and branches. Zscaler Private Access centralizes traffic control through its service edge, and Cato Networks SASE with ZTNA uses a global edge routing model to apply the same controls regardless of user location.
Deep integration with core identity platforms and device posture sources
Ztna works best when identity and posture data comes from the organization’s existing systems rather than from custom silos. Microsoft Entra Private Access focuses on deep Entra ID integration and can incorporate endpoint posture signals, and Okta Workforce Identity Cloud with ZTNA centers access authorization on Okta identity plus device posture.
Operational visibility for troubleshooting access decisions and sessions
Troubleshooting multi-hop access requires session visibility and logs that connect an access attempt to the specific policy decision. Cloudflare Zero Trust provides centralized logs and audit trails, and Zscaler Private Access delivers centralized session visibility to help teams troubleshoot access attempts across networks.
How to Choose the Right Ztna Software
The best fit comes from aligning Ztna’s policy model, private-connectivity approach, and identity integration to the organization’s existing architecture and access use cases.
Map access decisions to the service-edge enforcement model
Select Cloudflare Zero Trust when identity-aware ZTNA policies must be enforced at the edge with Cloudflare’s network as the enforcement point. Select Zscaler Private Access or Prisma Access when a cloud or security-fabric service edge should steer and enforce access with identity and device posture inputs. These choices determine how consistently access rules apply and where policy decisions get executed.
Decide how private apps should stay non-public
Choose Cloudflare Zero Trust if Cloudflare Tunnel is required to avoid exposing origins to the internet while still using Access policies for gating. Choose Zscaler Private Access, Microsoft Entra Private Access, or Ivanti Secure Access when private application connectors or secure gateway routing will be used to reach on-premises or private resources without broad network reach. These connector and routing decisions also drive onboarding complexity.
Use the right identity and device posture sources for policy inputs
Choose Microsoft Entra Private Access for Entra ID-first deployments that incorporate Entra posture signals into device-based access control. Choose Okta Workforce Identity Cloud with ZTNA when Okta authentication and policy authorization with device posture is the control-plane standard. Choose Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access when the deployment is already built around Palo Alto Networks security fabric and threat telemetry sources.
Handle complex workflows like technicians and privileged access with purpose-built tools
Choose BeyondTrust Remote Support and Privileged Access workflows when technician remote sessions must be tied to privileged access workflow policy controls. Use SailPoint Identity Security with ZTNA integrations when identity governance, access request workflows, and continuous recertification must feed least-privilege signals into ZTNA authorization across SaaS and private apps. These options reduce policy sprawl by connecting governance and access decisions.
Validate operational fit for onboarding and troubleshooting
Expect careful app connector onboarding and policy mapping when choosing Zscaler Private Access or Nord Security ZTNA because multi-hop routing and broker/session flows require correct configuration. Choose Cloudflare Zero Trust or Cato Networks SASE with ZTNA when centralized logs, audit trails, and a unified edge fabric support faster incident review. Then test access policy design for both success and failure paths using real identity groups and device posture signals.
Who Needs Ztna Software?
Ztna Software fits organizations that need app-level least-privilege access using identity and device trust while avoiding public exposure of internal services.
Enterprises standardizing identity-aware ZTNA with private app connectivity
Cloudflare Zero Trust fits this segment because it combines identity-aware Access policies, device posture checks, and Cloudflare Tunnel private connectivity that prevents direct origin exposure. Zscaler Private Access also fits when service-edge enforcement and per-app policies for remote users and branches are the standard model.
Enterprises standardizing secure app access for remote users and branch offices
Zscaler Private Access fits because it brokers access to private apps without exposing them on the public internet while enforcing per-app policies through the Zscaler service edge. Nord Security ZTNA is also a fit when identity-aligned policy enforcement must cover multiple internal applications through centralized brokered routing.
Enterprises standardizing on Palo Alto Networks for identity, endpoint security, and network threat prevention
Prisma Access fits this segment because ZTNA policy decisions can include identity signals, device posture, and threat telemetry enforced at the Prisma Access service edge. This alignment reduces friction when the security stack already uses Palo Alto Networks components for identity and threat data.
Enterprises standardizing technician remote support with privileged access governance
BeyondTrust Remote Support and Privileged Access workflows fits because it links monitored remote technician sessions to Privileged Access workflow policy controls. This creates controlled session handling for admin task execution while improving investigation and compliance evidence through session monitoring and recording.
Organizations modernizing remote access with policy-driven ZTNA in a unified SASE stack
Cato Networks SASE with ZTNA fits because it enforces ZTNA access per user and device posture in a global edge network fabric. This approach unifies ZTNA controls with secure network enforcement without requiring inbound exposure of internal networks.
Enterprises needing identity-governed ZTNA access across SaaS and private apps
SailPoint Identity Security with ZTNA integrations fits because it provides identity governance workflows, access request and certification automation, and continuous control enforcement feeding policy decisions. This creates ongoing least-privilege alignment rather than one-time access mapping.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Several recurring pitfalls reduce Ztna effectiveness even when the underlying access control features are strong.
Overcomplicating policy design without a clear app and identity mapping plan
Cloudflare Zero Trust supports complex multi-policy conditions like groups, geo, headers, and session context, and that flexibility can require careful design and testing to avoid unintended access behavior. Zscaler Private Access and Ivanti Secure Access also depend on correct app connectors and policy mapping, which can slow rollout when mappings stay incomplete.
Assuming device posture inputs are plug-and-play at scale
Cloudflare Zero Trust uses device posture checks and those posture setups can be operationally heavy for smaller teams when managed endpoint signals are not already in place. Prisma Access also depends heavily on correct identity and posture data sources, so missing or inconsistent signals can break expected gating behavior.
Treating Ztna as only a connectivity change instead of an authorization model
Nord Security ZTNA uses broker and session flows for protected applications, and deep troubleshooting requires understanding those flows alongside policy decisions. Ivanti Secure Access focuses on routing users to specific apps with identity and device trust checks, and organizations that model only network reach often struggle to validate least-privilege outcomes.
Ignoring workflow-specific requirements for privileged or technician access
BeyondTrust Remote Support and Privileged Access workflows ties monitored remote technician sessions to Privileged Access workflow policy controls, and ignoring this workflow linkage undermines least-privilege technician behavior. SailPoint Identity Security with ZTNA integrations emphasizes access request and certification workflows, and skipping governance alignment often leads to policy mapping churn over time.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated every tool on three sub-dimensions with weights of 0.40 for features, 0.30 for ease of use, and 0.30 for value. The overall rating equals 0.40 × features + 0.30 × ease of use + 0.30 × value. Cloudflare Zero Trust separated itself by pairing high feature coverage with practical policy enforcement at the edge through Access policies plus Cloudflare Tunnel private application connectivity. That combination strengthened both the features dimension and day-to-day troubleshooting confidence through centralized logs and audit trails.
Frequently Asked Questions About Ztna Software
How do Cloudflare Zero Trust and Zscaler Private Access enforce ZTNA at the edge?
Cloudflare Zero Trust enforces identity-aware access at the network edge using Access policies and blocks direct origin exposure by routing private applications through Cloudflare Tunnel. Zscaler Private Access enforces app-level decisions at the Zscaler service edge by steering traffic based on per-app access policies tied to identity and device posture checks.
Which ZTNA tools best support private application connectivity without public exposure?
Cloudflare Zero Trust uses Cloudflare Tunnel so backends do not need public exposure while Access policies still gate who can reach which app. Microsoft Entra Private Access uses private application connectors to reach on-premises and private cloud resources through an Entra-controlled access path that keeps destinations non-public.
How do Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access and Prisma Access competitors reduce lateral movement risk in ZTNA policies?
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access can base ZTNA decisions on identity signals, device posture, and threat telemetry at the service edge, which limits app-to-app reach during risky conditions. Zscaler Private Access follows the same app-broker model with per-app policies and centralized traffic steering through its service edge to restrict access to specific private apps.
How does device posture factor into ZTNA access decisions across different vendors?
Microsoft Entra Private Access and Zscaler Private Access can include device posture checks so authentication and access decisions depend on endpoint trust signals, not just user identity. Okta Workforce Identity Cloud with ZTNA also ties application access policies to Okta identity and device posture so sessions get continuously verified access based on the managed control plane.
Which ZTNA solution fits enterprises standardizing on a single identity provider like Entra or Okta?
Microsoft Entra Private Access is designed to route internal app traffic through Entra identity controls and device posture, using private application connectors for non-public resources. Okta Workforce Identity Cloud with ZTNA centers ZTNA on authenticated access workflows managed in Okta, using policy-based access tied to Okta identity and device-aware controls.
What is the best ZTNA option for managing remote technician access with governance controls?
BeyondTrust combines Remote Support with Privileged Access workflow governance so monitored technician sessions follow policy controls that reduce broad network reach. This workflow tie-in is distinct from broker-only models, because it links remote support execution and privileged credential handling to identity and role-based access rules.
How do Cato Networks and Cloudflare differ in how they deliver ZTNA as part of a broader security stack?
Cato Networks SASE enforces ZTNA per user and device posture through an integrated global edge fabric that routes traffic to internal applications while controlling north-south connectivity. Cloudflare Zero Trust enforces ZTNA at the edge with Access policies and private app routing via Cloudflare Tunnel, with additional integrations for security analytics around the access events.
Which tools integrate most directly with existing enterprise authentication and network security controls?
Ivanti Secure Access is built as a connectivity and access gateway layer that gates who can reach which applications using identity and device trust checks inside an existing enterprise authentication stack. Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access aligns ZTNA with the Palo Alto Networks security fabric, so identity, endpoint signals, and network threat prevention telemetry can influence service edge policy decisions.
What common ZTNA troubleshooting areas should teams plan for during rollout?
Teams often need visibility into access attempts and session handling, which is emphasized by Zscaler Private Access through logging and session visibility for troubleshooting across locations and networks. Cloudflare Zero Trust and Microsoft Entra Private Access both rely on policy decisions at the edge or Entra-mediated access path, so misaligned identity claims or device posture signals typically appear as denied or failed access events.
How does SailPoint Identity Security work with ZTNA when identity governance must drive access automatically?
SailPoint Identity Security can coordinate ZTNA posture and policy decisions using identity signals so ZTNA access aligns with the verified user context across directories and applications. It is strongest when access request and certification workflows must produce least-privilege signals that then govern ZTNA posture and connected private application access.
Tools reviewed
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Cybersecurity Information Security alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of cybersecurity information security tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare cybersecurity information security tools→FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS
Not on this list? Let’s fix that.
Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.
Apply for a ListingWHAT THIS INCLUDES
Where buyers compare
Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.
Editorial write-up
We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.
On-page brand presence
You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.
Kept up to date
We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.