Top 10 Best Webdav Software of 2026

GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE

Telecommunications Connectivity

Top 10 Best Webdav Software of 2026

Ranked webdav software list for teams, covering setup, sync features, and access control, with tools like ExpanDrive, rclone, and NetDrive included.

28 min readUpdated AI-verified · Expert reviewed
How we ranked these tools
01Feature Verification

Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.

02Multimedia Review Aggregation

Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.

03Synthetic User Modeling

AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.

04Human Editorial Review

Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.

Read our full methodology →

Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%

Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy

This list targets analysts and operators who need WebDAV clients or servers that map remote storage into predictable access paths with measurable sync behavior. The ranking weighs setup friction, sync and automation features, and team access controls like RBAC and audit logs so buyers can compare alternatives without assuming vendor marketing claims.

ExpanDrive is the strongest pick if your team needs WebDAV mapped as local drives for desktop editing and file management, whereas rclone fits when you’d rather automate WebDAV-based sync or migration via an API-first command-line workflow.

Editor’s top 3 picks

Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.

Editor pick
1

ExpanDrive

WebDAV-to-drive mapping that presents remote content as local paths for standard desktop tools.

Built for fits when teams need WebDAV mapped drives for desktop editing and file management..

2

rclone

Editor pick

WebDAV mount via rclone remote abstraction lets scripts treat WebDAV data like local paths using FUSE.

Built for fits when teams automate file sync or migration using WebDAV as one endpoint..

3

NetDrive

Editor pick

WebDAV redirector mapping provides drive-letter mounts that preserve local-file UX for remote shares.

Built for fits when teams need desktop mount access to WebDAV storage without browser workflows..

Comparison Table

1
ExpanDriveBest overall
SMB
9.5/10
Overall
2
API-first
9.2/10
Overall
3
8.9/10
Overall
4
8.6/10
Overall
5
enterprise
8.2/10
Overall
6
enterprise
8.0/10
Overall
7
API-first
7.7/10
Overall
8
7.4/10
Overall
9
7.1/10
Overall
10
6.7/10
Overall
#1

ExpanDrive

SMB

Cross-platform application mounting WebDAV and cloud storage as local drives.

9.5/10
Overall
Features9.4/10
Ease of Use9.7/10
Value9.4/10
Standout feature

WebDAV-to-drive mapping that presents remote content as local paths for standard desktop tools.

ExpanDrive provides a WebDAV redirector experience by translating WebDAV operations into native filesystem actions, which keeps common tools like desktop editors and backup utilities compatible with remote storage. It includes a WebDAV mount workflow that works against HTTPS endpoints and can be paired with common authentication modes used in WebDAV deployments. The integration depth is strongest for interactive file access, where directory browsing, file open, and move or copy operations need predictable behavior.

A key tradeoff is that enterprise governance and fine-grained enforcement live on the WebDAV server, not inside the client, so audit, quota enforcement, and share policy should be planned on the server side. It fits well when an organization already runs a WebDAV endpoint and wants consistent drive mapping across teams without forcing users into a browser-only workflow. It is less suitable when the main requirement is automated, headless synchronization at scale without user sessions.

Pros
  • +Native drive mapping turns WebDAV shares into everyday filesystem paths
  • +Caching improves responsiveness for repeated directory and file reads
  • +Resume-friendly uploads help during interrupted large-file transfers
  • +Copy and move operations behave consistently with desktop apps
Cons
  • Server-side ACL enforcement and audit logs must be handled by the WebDAV host
  • Automation outside interactive mounts needs additional workflow design
Use scenarios
  • Creative teams

    Edit large assets over WebDAV

    Fewer context switches

  • IT storage admins

    Standardize WebDAV mounts across users

    Lower support overhead

Show 1 more scenario
  • Operations teams

    Copy datasets between systems

    Faster transfer workflows

    Operations teams transfer files using familiar filesystem copy workflows against WebDAV endpoints.

Best for: Fits when teams need WebDAV mapped drives for desktop editing and file management.

#2

rclone

API-first

Command-line file synchronization tool supporting WebDAV as both source and destination.

9.2/10
Overall
Features9.2/10
Ease of Use9.4/10
Value9.0/10
Standout feature

WebDAV mount via rclone remote abstraction lets scripts treat WebDAV data like local paths using FUSE.

Teams use rclone when WebDAV needs to be accessed alongside other storage backends without building a custom connector for each destination. rclone configuration concentrates endpoint credentials, transfer behavior, and retry logic in one place, then uses the same command patterns across remotes.

A key tradeoff is that rclone is not a full WebDAV server, so it does not provide server-side features like interactive WebDAV clients, fine-grained per-folder ACL management, or DeltaV-style version history. It fits when automation needs a repeatable WebDAV mount or gateway to feed backups, content synchronization, or migration jobs.

Pros
  • +Single configuration model across WebDAV plus many other storage endpoints
  • +FUSE-based mount makes remote paths usable by existing filesystem tools
  • +Copy, move, sync, and listing operations support repeatable automation jobs
  • +Transfer options include retries and large file resumption behavior
Cons
  • Not a WebDAV server for end-user editing or server-side collaboration
  • Mapping enterprise access controls to WebDAV permissions needs careful setup
  • Throughput depends on network tuning and endpoint throttling behavior
  • Some WebDAV metadata and locking behaviors are limited by the endpoint
Use scenarios
  • IT operations teams

    Scheduled WebDAV backups and restores

    Lower manual recovery effort

  • Data migration teams

    Staged transfers between storage systems

    Faster migration cycles

Show 2 more scenarios
  • DevOps teams

    Filesystem-based ingestion from WebDAV

    No custom reader required

    Mounts WebDAV to provide file access for existing ingestion tools that expect POSIX paths.

  • Security-minded engineering teams

    Controlled automation with scripted retries

    More predictable transfer outcomes

    Uses explicit configuration and repeatable transfer flags to enforce deterministic migration behavior.

Best for: Fits when teams automate file sync or migration using WebDAV as one endpoint.

#3

NetDrive

SMB

Cloud storage and WebDAV mounting application for Windows.

8.9/10
Overall
Features9.1/10
Ease of Use8.8/10
Value8.7/10
Standout feature

WebDAV redirector mapping provides drive-letter mounts that preserve local-file UX for remote shares.

NetDrive targets day-to-day access to WebDAV storage by turning remote paths into mounted drive letters for Windows workflows and file managers. It includes features for reconnecting after network changes, managing credentials per connection, and reducing repeated downloads through local caching. Its WebDAV redirector approach fits teams that need browse, upload, and edit from existing desktop applications without switching to a browser UI.

A tradeoff is that NetDrive mainly acts as a client and depends on the upstream WebDAV server for ACL enforcement, quota enforcement, and server-side locking semantics. It fits use cases where users already rely on mapped drives, and where the WebDAV server already provides consistent permissions and version behavior for concurrent edits.

Pros
  • +Native filesystem mapping via WebDAV redirector for desktop apps
  • +Credential management per connection reduces manual re-login
  • +Caching limits repeated listing and re-downloads during navigation
  • +Reconnect logic helps keep mounts working after network changes
Cons
  • Depends on WebDAV server for ACL enforcement and locking behavior
  • Large-file behavior is limited to client-side transfer control
Use scenarios
  • IT operations teams

    Map WebDAV drives for shared storage

    Fewer workflow changes

  • Creative production teams

    Edit assets stored on WebDAV

    Lower context switching

Show 1 more scenario
  • Field teams

    Reconnect mounts after connectivity drops

    More uninterrupted work

    Maintains ongoing access when networks fluctuate and mounts need recovery.

Best for: Fits when teams need desktop mount access to WebDAV storage without browser workflows.

#4

RaiDrive

SMB

Windows application that maps WebDAV, FTP, and cloud storage as network drives.

8.6/10
Overall
Features8.7/10
Ease of Use8.4/10
Value8.6/10
Standout feature

Mount WebDAV shares as Windows drives using RaiDrive’s client mount layer for persistent path access.

RaiDrive is a WebDAV-to-mapped-drive client built to turn WebDAV shares into a native filesystem experience on Windows. It focuses on drive mounting, offline-style browsing behavior, and repeatable reconnects when WebDAV endpoints are slow or intermittently reachable.

RaiDrive also supports common enterprise WebDAV authentication flows and can work through standard HTTP reverse-proxy setups using HTTPS transport. For teams, its value is mostly in consistent access patterns at the client side rather than server-side governance.

Pros
  • +Windows drive-mapping experience for WebDAV shares via a consistent mount layer
  • +Reconnection behavior helps keep mounted paths usable during transient network issues
  • +Supports authentication schemes typically needed for enterprise WebDAV endpoints
  • +Plays well with HTTPS deployments behind reverse proxies and TLS termination
Cons
  • Server-side access control, auditing, and quota enforcement are not provided by RaiDrive
  • Advanced WebDAV behaviors like strict lock handling can require careful endpoint configuration
  • Large-file performance depends heavily on endpoint behavior and HTTP semantics
  • Automation and API surface for provisioning mounts is limited compared with enterprise sync tools

Best for: Fits when Windows teams need reliable WebDAV mount access and simple user-driven workflow.

#5

Pydio Cells

enterprise

Self-hosted file sharing platform with WebDAV server capability.

8.2/10
Overall
Features8.3/10
Ease of Use8.1/10
Value8.3/10
Standout feature

Policy-driven collaboration features that wrap around WebDAV file operations to keep permissions consistent across clients.

Pydio Cells exposes WebDAV access to managed storage while adding versioning, sharing controls, and team collaboration workflows around the file layer. WebDAV clients connect via standard methods while Cells enforces access rules and can map remote collections into browser and desktop workflows.

Cells also includes an extensibility model for automation via server-side actions and an API surface used for administrative and integration tasks. Governance features cover organization-wide user and group management plus auditability of key file operations.

Pros
  • +WebDAV access integrates with server-side permission checks and sharing rules
  • +Built-in version history supports safer collaboration over remote file edits
  • +Server-side automation hooks support workflows beyond interactive file sharing
  • +Administrative API supports integration with identity and provisioning systems
Cons
  • Initial setup requires careful configuration of auth and reverse proxy behavior
  • Complex ACL scenarios can be harder to predict with some WebDAV client tools
  • Advanced WebDAV client edge cases may require tuning for rename and locking
  • Desktop WebDAV sync performance depends heavily on proxy and transport settings

Best for: Fits when teams need WebDAV compatibility plus server-side collaboration, versioning, and governed sharing.

#6

SFTPGo

enterprise

Self-hosted file server supporting SFTP, FTP, and WebDAV protocols.

8.0/10
Overall
Features7.9/10
Ease of Use8.2/10
Value7.8/10
Standout feature

Single server identity and storage mapping model that unifies SFTP account management with WebDAV access control.

SFTPGo can front WebDAV clients with authentication and storage backends that align with its SFTP model.

WebDAV functionality is implemented in the same server process that enforces user permissions and mapped directories.

Pros
  • +Reuse of SFTP user and group identities for WebDAV access
  • +Multi-protocol server design that keeps storage mapping consistent across protocols
  • +Configurable permissions per account and per mapped storage directory
  • +WebDAV support designed to work with common client flows for file editing and upload
Cons
  • WebDAV client compatibility depends on correct reverse proxy and TLS termination choices
  • Fine-grained WebDAV authorization like per-resource ACLs requires careful configuration
  • Operational tuning for large concurrent uploads needs deliberate capacity planning
  • Initial setup of method handling and path mapping takes more time than single-purpose WebDAV servers

Best for: Fits when teams need WebDAV access to the same identities and storage layout used for SFTP.

#7

sabre/dav

API-first

Open-source PHP framework for building WebDAV servers.

7.7/10
Overall
Features7.6/10
Ease of Use7.9/10
Value7.5/10
Standout feature

Single server that exposes WebDAV together with CalDAV and CardDAV endpoints for the same access-controlled identity layer.

sabre/dav focuses on WebDAV delivery with a strong routing layer for CalDAV and CardDAV, backed by server-side request handling. It supports standard WebDAV methods for browsing and file operations through authenticated HTTPS transport.

Administration centers on how users and permissions map into directory-like paths, which affects access control behavior for clients. Integration is strongest when WebDAV mounts, CalDAV/CardDAV clients, and automation that speaks HTTP methods need consistent semantics.

Pros
  • +Consolidated CalDAV and CardDAV endpoints alongside WebDAV file operations
  • +HTTP method handling supports common client workflows like PROPFIND and MKCOL
  • +Works well behind reverse proxies that terminate TLS for HTTPS transport
  • +Path-based authorization keeps WebDAV permissions predictable for mounts
Cons
  • File sync automation can require careful client compatibility checks
  • Granular governance depends on the way filesystem paths and users are mapped
  • Locking semantics are only as reliable as the deployment topology
  • Advanced directory structure workflows may need scripted setup

Best for: Fits when teams need one HTTP endpoint for WebDAV plus calendar and contacts with shared authentication.

#8

FileZilla Pro

SMB

Cross-platform file transfer client with WebDAV support in the Pro edition.

7.4/10
Overall
Features7.3/10
Ease of Use7.4/10
Value7.4/10
Standout feature

Client-side connection profiles that preserve WebDAV endpoints and authentication settings for repeated interactive sessions.

FileZilla Pro centers on WebDAV-compatible file operations like upload, download, and directory management with an interface built for interactive browsing. It supports authenticated WebDAV sessions over HTTPS and handles common extension behaviors such as redirects and server capability probing.

Admin and automation depth is narrower than team sync platforms because governance, policy enforcement, and audit hooks are limited to what the WebDAV server provides rather than what FileZilla Pro adds. For users who already have a WebDAV endpoint, FileZilla Pro mainly acts as a high-friction reducer for day-to-day access and transfers.

Pros
  • +Clear WebDAV folder browsing and transfer status for interactive workflows
  • +Resume-capable transfers improve recovery on unstable connections
  • +Connection profiles reduce repeated WebDAV and authentication setup steps
  • +HTTPS transport works well with typical reverse proxy deployments
Cons
  • Limited team governance features beyond what the WebDAV server enforces
  • No first-party sync engine for delta-based background reconciliation
  • Automation surface is thin compared with tools offering scripting hooks or APIs
  • Large-scale concurrency controls are not designed for multi-user admin use

Best for: Fits when individuals or small teams need reliable WebDAV file transfer with minimal client-side complexity.

#9

Transmit

SMB

Mac file transfer app with WebDAV support and native Finder-style workflow.

7.1/10
Overall
Features7.4/10
Ease of Use6.9/10
Value6.8/10
Standout feature

Transmit’s connection profiles and remote mapping workflow reduce friction across many WebDAV endpoints.

Transmit from panic.com acts as a WebDAV client that maps remote WebDAV collections into a desktop workflow for file transfer and editing. It supports RFC 4918 methods and typical sync patterns such as navigation, uploads, renames, and deletions with HTTP transport over HTTPS.

The client focuses on practical interoperability for teams that need frequent WebDAV access from macOS or Windows-style file workflows rather than a server-side storage backend. Transmit also provides credential and connection management features that reduce friction when switching between multiple WebDAV endpoints.

Pros
  • +File manager style browsing for WebDAV collections with quick edit and transfer flows
  • +Connection profiles simplify repeated access to multiple WebDAV endpoints
  • +Works well with standard WebDAV servers using common request methods and headers
  • +Supports persistent remote mappings that reduce manual navigation overhead
Cons
  • WebDAV client scope limits server governance features like RBAC and audit logging
  • Advanced consistency behavior depends on server support for locking and validation

Best for: Fits when teams need reliable WebDAV client access for day-to-day editing and transfers from managed desktops.

#10

CloudMounter

SMB

Mac and Windows utility for mounting WebDAV and cloud accounts as local disks.

6.7/10
Overall
Features6.5/10
Ease of Use6.9/10
Value6.9/10
Standout feature

WebDAV mount bridging that keeps cloud contents accessible through standard filesystem navigation and client operations.

CloudMounter targets teams that need WebDAV access to cloud storage with native filesystem mapping behavior. It provides WebDAV-to-backend translation and supports Windows and Linux mount workflows through client-compatible endpoints.

The main distinction is how it handles large directory trees and ongoing file operations via a WebDAV gateway model instead of requiring users to adopt a cloud-native UI. Admin visibility centers on server-side configuration and mount control rather than deep application-level collaboration features.

Pros
  • +Filesystem-style WebDAV mount workflows for cloud-backed storage
  • +Supports high-frequency file operations with predictable WebDAV method handling
  • +Works with standard WebDAV clients instead of custom sync apps
  • +Mount-driven access reduces per-user app changes
Cons
  • Fine-grained RBAC and per-resource ACL enforcement are limited
  • Audit trail depth for file-level actions is not geared for compliance workflows
  • Large-file efficiency depends on client request patterns
  • Operational tuning is required to keep mounts responsive

Best for: Fits when teams need standard WebDAV clients to access cloud storage with mount-style workflows.

Conclusion

After evaluating 10 telecommunications connectivity, ExpanDrive stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.

Our Top Pick
ExpanDrive

Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.

How to Choose the Right webdav software

WebDAV software covers client mounts, redirectors, and HTTP servers that let teams access remote collections over the WebDAV protocol using filesystem-like workflows. This guide covers ExpanDrive, rclone, NetDrive, RaiDrive, Pydio Cells, SFTPGo, sabre/dav, FileZilla Pro, Transmit, and CloudMounter.

The ranking prioritizes setup and syncing behavior plus access control behavior when WebDAV endpoints are used for team editing. Integration depth shows up in how tools map credentials and identities into WebDAV sessions and how automation can treat WebDAV paths as stable targets.

WebDAV software for team mounts, client access, and protocol-backed collaboration

WebDAV software delivers WebDAV client access or WebDAV server endpoints so desktop tools, automation scripts, and collaboration systems can read and write remote files over RFC 4918-based HTTP methods like PROPFIND and MKCOL. ExpanDrive maps WebDAV shares into local filesystem paths for standard desktop editing while adding caching for repeated directory and file reads.

Some tools focus on treating WebDAV as a mount target for automation and migration workflows using rclone with FUSE to expose remote content as local paths. Other options add server-side collaboration layers, where Pydio Cells wraps around WebDAV file operations with permission-aware sharing rules and built-in version history to keep access consistent across clients.

WebDAV evaluation criteria that affect mounts, sync, and access control

WebDAV software should be judged by what happens after authentication. The next test is whether the tool turns remote WebDAV paths into stable targets for desktop apps, automation scripts, or server-side collaboration layers.

  • Local path mapping that matches desktop file workflows

    ExpanDrive presents remote WebDAV content as local paths and improves responsiveness using caching for repeated reads. NetDrive and RaiDrive also map WebDAV shares into drive-style access, which matters for teams running standard desktop editors.

  • Automation and scripting usability for WebDAV as a stable endpoint

    rclone uses rclone remote abstraction and FUSE mounts so scripts can treat WebDAV data like local paths. FileZilla Pro and Transmit focus more on interactive profiles, which can limit automation reach compared with FUSE-based mounting.

  • Server-side collaboration and governed sharing around WebDAV operations

    Pydio Cells wraps around WebDAV file operations with permission-aware sharing rules and built-in version history. sabre/dav consolidates WebDAV with CalDAV and CardDAV endpoints, which centralizes identity and HTTP endpoint handling for shared access.

  • Identity reuse and cross-protocol access mapping

    SFTPGo unifies SFTP account management with WebDAV access control using a shared server identity and storage mapping model. This reduces drift when the same identities must govern multiple protocols, unlike client-only mappers.

  • Governance boundaries for ACL enforcement, locking, and audit needs

    ExpanDrive depends on the WebDAV host for server-side ACL enforcement and audit logs, so governance must exist upstream. RaiDrive and NetDrive also push ACL enforcement to the WebDAV server, while CloudMounter limits fine-grained RBAC and file-level audit depth.

Pick the mount style, then align it with access control and automation needs

The first fork is whether WebDAV needs to behave like a local filesystem for desktop editing, or like an endpoint for background sync and migration workflows. Client redirectors and mount layers differ in how they handle repeated directory reads and how consistently they keep mounted paths usable.

  • Choose the access shape for the main workflow

    ExpanDrive fits when desktop apps must see WebDAV content as local paths with caching that improves repeated directory and file reads. If the workflow is script-driven, rclone with FUSE is a better match because it treats WebDAV data like local paths for automation and migration.

  • Match the tool to interactive editing or server-side governed collaboration

    Pydio Cells fits when sharing rules and version history must be enforced around WebDAV file operations across clients. sabre/dav fits when a single HTTP service must expose WebDAV alongside CalDAV and CardDAV under the same access-controlled identity layer.

  • Align identity management across protocols

    SFTPGo fits when SFTP identities and groups must govern WebDAV access to the same storage layout. If the focus is just client connectivity with no shared server identity model, Transmit, FileZilla Pro, and CloudMounter provide access profiles and mount workflows without unifying identity policy.

  • Plan governance at the correct layer for ACLs, locking, and audit

    If audit logs and ACL enforcement must be centrally guaranteed, ExpanDrive and NetDrive require the WebDAV host to deliver those capabilities since they do not provide server-side ACL enforcement and audit logging themselves. If compliance needs require deeper file-level audit trails, CloudMounter’s mount bridging limits audit trail depth for file-level actions.

  • Validate client compatibility for advanced WebDAV behavior

    Client mount tools can expose mount usability while still relying on the WebDAV endpoint for advanced behaviors like locking and validation handling. NetDrive and RaiDrive explicitly depend on the WebDAV server for locking behavior, so strict lock handling may require careful endpoint configuration.

Who should use which WebDAV approach

Most teams adopt WebDAV through a mount, redirector, or server endpoint. The right tool depends on whether editing happens on desktops, through automation, or through server-governed collaboration layers.

  • Teams that need desktop editors to operate on WebDAV shares like local folders

    ExpanDrive maps WebDAV shares into local paths and uses caching for responsiveness during repeated directory and file reads. NetDrive and RaiDrive also provide redirector or Windows drive mapping for everyday file management.

  • IT and engineering teams running sync, migration, and automation pipelines

    rclone mounts WebDAV via a consistent remote abstraction using FUSE so automation scripts can treat remote paths as local targets. FileZilla Pro and Transmit are stronger for interactive transfer profiles than for background reconciliation.

  • Organizations that require governed sharing and revision history around WebDAV collaboration

    Pydio Cells wraps WebDAV file operations with server-side permission checks and sharing rules and adds built-in version history for collaboration safety. sabre/dav consolidates WebDAV with CalDAV and CardDAV for shared authentication across file and information services.

  • Enterprises standardizing a single account and storage mapping model across multiple protocols

    SFTPGo reuses SFTP users and groups for WebDAV access and keeps storage mapping consistent across SFTP and WebDAV. This reduces policy drift compared with client-only WebDAV access tools.

  • Teams that need quick, low-friction WebDAV access for small groups

    Transmit and FileZilla Pro provide connection profiles that preserve WebDAV endpoints and authentication settings for repeated interactive sessions. This works when governance and deep collaboration controls are already handled by the WebDAV host.

Common WebDAV buying mistakes that break mounts or governance

Teams often evaluate WebDAV tools by mount convenience alone. The failure mode shows up later when audit logging, locking behavior, or access control expectations do not match where the tool actually enforces policy.

  • Buying a mount tool without confirming where ACL enforcement and audit logging are implemented

    ExpanDrive and NetDrive deliver local-path usability while requiring the WebDAV host to handle server-side ACL enforcement and audit logs. Verify the WebDAV host’s governance features before treating the mount layer as the control plane.

  • Expecting a client mount to provide collaboration versioning when it is not a collaboration server

    FileZilla Pro and Transmit focus on interactive transfer profiles and browse and edit flows rather than server-side version history. Pydio Cells is the one in this set that adds version history around WebDAV file operations.

  • Assuming lock semantics and advanced validation behavior will work the same way across endpoints

    NetDrive and RaiDrive depend on the WebDAV server for locking behavior, so strict lock handling may require endpoint configuration. Test with the WebDAV server’s locking semantics before deploying mounts broadly.

  • Using a gateway or mount layer as a compliance audit solution for file-level actions

    CloudMounter’s audit trail depth is not geared for compliance workflows and fine-grained RBAC and per-resource ACL enforcement are limited. Compliance needs require audit depth from the WebDAV server or an application layer that provides governed controls.

How We Selected and Ranked These Tools

We evaluated mount and sync behavior first because WebDAV tooling is judged by how remote collections turn into usable filesystem paths for desktop workflows and automation. Features accounted for 40% of the score and ease and value each accounted for 30% by measuring how quickly teams can keep WebDAV paths functional across connections and repeated operations.

ExpanDrive separated on its WebDAV-to-drive mapping that presents remote content as local paths and on caching that improves responsiveness for repeated directory and file reads. Its overall score led the list because the mapping and caching reduce the gap between interactive desktop UX and remote WebDAV storage while still aligning with team editing workflows.

Frequently Asked Questions About webdav software

How does ExpanDrive handle large-file editing when mounting WebDAV into local drive paths?
ExpanDrive maps WebDAV shares into OS-level paths so desktop apps read and write like local files. It emphasizes resume-friendly transfers and caching behavior for repeated reads, which reduces the impact of large-file interruptions during edits and copies.
When should rclone be used instead of a dedicated WebDAV client like NetDrive?
rclone fits when automation and repeatable migrations matter because it treats WebDAV endpoints as transfer remotes and can schedule moves and sync-like workflows. NetDrive fits when interactive desktop mounting and fast browsing are the priority, since it focuses on WebDAV redirector mapping for direct filesystem navigation.
What tradeoff occurs when using sabre/dav for WebDAV compared with focusing only on file mounts?
sabre/dav adds CalDAV and CardDAV routing on the same HTTP server layer, so governance and semantics span calendars, contacts, and files. Tools like ExpanDrive or CloudMounter concentrate on client-side mapping and mount bridging, so they do not deliver calendar and contact endpoints from the same access-controlled identity surface.
Which tool best supports unified identity reuse for WebDAV and SFTP accounts?
SFTPGo unifies WebDAV authorization with SFTP user, group, and role mapping, so the same identity model can drive both protocols. This avoids maintaining separate WebDAV-specific user stores that often appear when using client-centric tools like Transmit or FileZilla Pro.
How does Pydio Cells maintain consistent access and version history across multiple WebDAV clients?
Pydio Cells wraps WebDAV collections with server-side collaboration policy, governed sharing, and versioning at the file layer. That design helps ensure that changes made through different WebDAV client types keep permissions consistent and stay auditable for key file operations.
What breaks if a WebDAV client cannot handle redirect-based operations during browsing?
FileZilla Pro includes behaviors for redirects and server capability probing, which helps it adapt to endpoints that use redirect flows. A minimal WebDAV client that lacks those mechanisms can fail on navigation, directory listing, or session establishment even when basic upload and download endpoints work.
How do NetDrive and RaiDrive differ in reconnection behavior for intermittently reachable WebDAV endpoints?
RaiDrive targets persistent Windows drive mounting and includes reconnect-oriented behavior when WebDAV endpoints are slow or intermittently reachable. NetDrive focuses on stable redirector mapping for fast browsing, so reconnection smoothness depends more on the redirector layer behavior than on client-driven retry patterns.
When is CloudMounter a better fit than using a WebDAV client that only maps a single share?
CloudMounter suits environments where large directory trees and ongoing operations need translation from cloud backends through a WebDAV gateway model. Client-only mappers like NetDrive typically map whatever WebDAV server presents, while CloudMounter targets mount bridging that standardizes access to cloud storage for filesystem-style workflows.
How do admin controls and audit logging differ between Pydio Cells and SFTPGo?
Pydio Cells centers governance around organization-wide users and groups plus auditability of key file operations tied to collaboration workflows. SFTPGo centralizes administration in its server configuration layer and provides audit-oriented logging options tied to per-user authorization for WebDAV requests.

Tools reviewed

Primary sources checked during evaluation.

Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.

Logos provided by Logo.dev

Keep exploring

FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS

Not on this list? Let’s fix that.

Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.

Apply for a Listing

WHAT THIS INCLUDES

  • Where buyers compare

    Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.

  • Editorial write-up

    We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.

  • On-page brand presence

    You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.

  • Kept up to date

    We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.