Top 10 Best Wake On Lan Software of 2026

GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE

Telecommunications Connectivity

Top 10 Best Wake On Lan Software of 2026

Top 10 wake on lan software for IT admins, ranked with tradeoffs and comparisons using tools like Advanced IP Scanner, Action1, and Lansweeper.

31 min readUpdated AI-verified · Expert reviewed
How we ranked these tools
01Feature Verification

Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.

02Multimedia Review Aggregation

Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.

03Synthetic User Modeling

AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.

04Human Editorial Review

Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.

Read our full methodology →

Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%

Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy

This ranked list targets IT admins and network operators who need Wake-on-LAN workflows tied to discovery, not just manual packet sending. Tools are compared on how they scan for endpoints, validate targeting across subnets and IP versions, and support automation hooks that fit existing monitoring or endpoint management environments.

Advanced IP Scanner is the best pick when you want a quick network inventory-to-WoL workflow without running a management server, whereas Lansweeper fits IT teams that want wake actions driven by continuously updated asset discovery across the network.

Editor’s top 3 picks

Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.

Editor pick
1

Advanced IP Scanner

ARP-driven discovery produces a ready MAC inventory that can immediately feed WoL sends from the same UI.

Built for fits when admins need quick LAN inventory-to-WoL workflow without a management server..

2

Action1

Editor pick

Scheduled wake campaigns driven by Action1 endpoint inventory streamline recurring wake operations for managed devices.

Built for fits when IT manages sleeping Windows fleets from one console and needs scheduled wake actions..

3

Lansweeper

Editor pick

Wake-on-LAN tasks run from Lansweeper’s discovery-based asset inventory instead of standalone MAC lists.

Built for fits when IT teams want wake actions driven by continuously updated asset inventory..

Comparison Table

1
SMB
9.1/10
Overall
2
8.8/10
Overall
3
enterprise
8.5/10
Overall
4
8.2/10
Overall
5
7.9/10
Overall
6
7.6/10
Overall
7
7.2/10
Overall
8
6.9/10
Overall
9
6.6/10
Overall
10
6.3/10
Overall
#1

Advanced IP Scanner

SMB

Free network scanner that includes Wake-on-LAN packet sending for detected devices.

9.1/10
Overall
Features9.1/10
Ease of Use8.9/10
Value9.4/10
Standout feature

ARP-driven discovery produces a ready MAC inventory that can immediately feed WoL sends from the same UI.

Advanced IP Scanner performs subnet host discovery by querying reachable devices and capturing IP and MAC address mappings. It shows results in a sortable host grid and lets users select targets for WoL without leaving the scanning workflow. Wake on LAN uses configured settings for each host’s MAC address and can send Magic Packet frames on demand.

A practical tradeoff is that WoL coverage over routed networks depends on how packets are forwarded, so WAN wake often requires network support like directed broadcast or a relay device. A common usage situation is waking a set of office PCs after an inventory scan, then verifying state changes through subsequent scans and device reachability.

Pros
  • +Fast LAN host discovery with IP and MAC capture for wake targeting
  • +WoL actions run directly from the discovered host list
  • +Batch wake from multiple selected devices in one operation
  • +Exportable scan results help document target MAC mappings
Cons
  • WoL over routed segments typically depends on broadcast or relay design
  • No centralized admin console for multi-site policy and reporting
Use scenarios
  • IT helpdesk

    Wake PCs after asset scans

    Fewer manual wake attempts

  • Sysadmins

    Run scheduled inventory and wake rounds

    Lower downtime during changes

Show 1 more scenario
  • Facilities IT coordinators

    Power-cycle lab workstations on demand

    Faster session readiness

    Coordinators select lab devices from scan results and send WoL to start remote sessions.

Best for: Fits when admins need quick LAN inventory-to-WoL workflow without a management server.

#2

Action1

SMB

Cloud-native endpoint management platform with remote actions that include wake on LAN support.

8.8/10
Overall
Features9.1/10
Ease of Use8.6/10
Value8.7/10
Standout feature

Scheduled wake campaigns driven by Action1 endpoint inventory streamline recurring wake operations for managed devices.

Action1 uses an endpoint agent to keep device identity current and to drive wake actions from a centralized web console. Wake campaigns can be scheduled and applied to selected device sets, which supports recurring maintenance windows without per-device manual triggers. Targeting can use inventory attributes such as hostnames and MAC addresses, which helps teams avoid mismatches when DHCP changes. Integration depth is anchored in Action1’s Windows management model, so the wake workflow is most complete when endpoints are enrolled and monitored in the same system.

A practical tradeoff is that broad WoL across unmanaged devices depends on how the required device identity is entered into Action1, not on passive network discovery. Action1 fits scenarios where helpdesk needs to wake a subset of servers or workstations before running post-wake tasks during onboarding, patch prep, or remote troubleshooting. It also works when wake needs are recurring and operational ownership sits with a small set of administrators managing delegated access and oversight.

Pros
  • +Agent-backed device inventory reduces MAC mismatch during wake targeting
  • +Scheduled wake tasks support maintenance windows without operator intervention
  • +Console-based device selection speeds helpdesk workflows
  • +Role-based access controls support delegated administration
Cons
  • Full coverage relies on enrolled endpoints for accurate identity
  • Cross-subnet wake setups can require extra network planning
  • Wake action visibility depends on endpoint reachability afterward
  • Non-Windows device onboarding is less direct than Windows endpoints
Use scenarios
  • IT helpdesk teams

    Wake machines before remote troubleshooting

    Faster incident response

  • Systems administrators

    Pre-stage endpoints for patch workflows

    Higher patch completion

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Endpoint management teams

    Wake fleets after planned downtime

    Coordinated maintenance

    Teams coordinate wake timing after shutdown windows to bring devices back before operational work starts.

  • Onboarding operations

    Wake devices during rollouts

    Shorter onboarding delays

    Onboarding uses inventory-based targeting to wake endpoints so enrollment and configuration steps can proceed.

Best for: Fits when IT manages sleeping Windows fleets from one console and needs scheduled wake actions.

#3

Lansweeper

enterprise

IT asset management platform with built-in Wake-on-LAN for discovered network devices.

8.5/10
Overall
Features8.6/10
Ease of Use8.6/10
Value8.2/10
Standout feature

Wake-on-LAN tasks run from Lansweeper’s discovery-based asset inventory instead of standalone MAC lists.

Lansweeper’s core differentiator in wake-on-LAN workflows is that device lists are built from continuous endpoint discovery, not just a manually maintained target list. The system inventory includes hardware identifiers used for wake targeting, and it can track changes when devices move across subnets. Wake tasks can then be scheduled and run against selected device sets from the same console.

A tradeoff appears in environments that expect wake validation and ACK-style confirmation, since Lansweeper’s wake flow centers on issuing the magic packet rather than confirming end-state power changes. Lansweeper fits best when wake is part of broader device lifecycle management, such as waking lab systems for patching windows or bringing dormant endpoints online for inventory refresh.

Pros
  • +Inventory-backed device targeting reduces manual MAC address upkeep.
  • +Scheduled wake tasks tie into day-to-day endpoint maintenance windows.
  • +Central console links discovery status with wake candidate selection.
  • +Flexible device filtering supports bulk wake by roles and properties.
Cons
  • Wake confirmation feedback is limited to packet dispatch visibility.
  • Multi-subnet wake requires careful network planning for routing behavior.
Use scenarios
  • IT operations teams

    Wake endpoints for patch maintenance

    Fewer missed patch cycles

  • System administrators

    Wake lab devices for imaging

    Faster lab turnaround

Show 2 more scenarios
  • IT asset management

    Refresh inventory from off-hours

    More complete asset records

    Wake tasks align with discovery scans so inventory updates occur without daytime disruption.

  • Network operations

    Recover unreachable assets after moves

    Lower recovery time

    Discovery updates candidate lists after network changes, then wake can target updated NIC identifiers.

Best for: Fits when IT teams want wake actions driven by continuously updated asset inventory.

#4

ManageEngine OpUtils

enterprise

IP address management and switch port mapping software with wake on LAN tools for Windows networks.

8.2/10
Overall
Features7.9/10
Ease of Use8.3/10
Value8.5/10
Standout feature

Network discovery-driven endpoint selection for WoL execution reduces static MAC management.

ManageEngine OpUtils combines a wake-on-LAN sender with network scanning so admins can generate target lists from live endpoint data rather than maintaining static MAC rosters. It adds device-management context around WoL actions, including subnet and interface awareness for broadcasting scenarios and scheduled wake tasks.

OpUtils also fits into broader ManageEngine deployments through centralized administration patterns common across the OpManager and related ecosystem. The overall result is tighter operational control than basic WoL utilities, with less friction when discovery, targeting, and execution need to sit in one workflow.

Pros
  • +Discovery-driven WoL targeting reduces manual MAC inventory drift
  • +Scheduled wake tasks support recurring maintenance windows
  • +Broadcast and subnet handling fits multi-network environments
  • +Centralized ManageEngine-style administration supports day-two operations
Cons
  • WoL over WAN workflows demand careful network and routing configuration
  • Operational UX can feel heavier than single-purpose WoL tools

Best for: Fits when admins need discovery-to-wake automation for endpoints across multiple subnets.

#5

EMCO WakeOnLan

SMB

Dedicated network utility for waking remote PCs with scheduling, scanning, and remote shutdown features.

7.9/10
Overall
Features7.8/10
Ease of Use7.9/10
Value7.9/10
Standout feature

Scheduled wake tasks tied to imported host inventories, so recurring wake windows work without manual MAC input.

EMCO WakeOnLan sends Magic Packet wake requests from a centralized Windows-based console with per-device power actions. It supports subnet broadcast addressing and scripted wake schedules so wake operations can run without interactive sessions.

EMCO WakeOnLan also includes inventory-driven device selection through importable host lists, which reduces manual MAC address entry. Admin control focuses on configuration of wake targets, retries, and network scope rather than on remote device-side orchestration.

Pros
  • +Central console coordinates wake scheduling and target management
  • +Configurable retries and network scope reduce missed wake attempts
  • +Supports subnet broadcast workflows for common enterprise layouts
  • +Bulk host import cuts time spent on MAC address entry
Cons
  • Network configuration needs careful broadcast routing for multi-subnet wakes
  • Device wake confirmation is not always available without extra monitoring
  • Wake operations depend on reachable UDP broadcast behavior
  • Automation is strongest around scheduling rather than event-driven triggers

Best for: Fits when IT admins need scheduled, centralized wake operations across managed Windows fleets.

#6

Depicus Wake on LAN

utility

Simple wake on LAN software and utilities for sending magic packets to remote systems.

7.6/10
Overall
Features7.8/10
Ease of Use7.3/10
Value7.5/10
Standout feature

Scheduled wake tasks with centralized host grouping for recurring maintenance windows across LAN and WAN targets.

Depicus Wake on LAN is a wake-on-LAN management tool built around targeting specific hosts by MAC address and sending Magic Packet wake signals from a centralized interface. It supports wake scheduling, host grouping, and recurring tasks for recurring maintenance windows instead of one-off wake events.

Admin workflows center on discovery, reachability checks, and operational logs so technicians can troubleshoot failed wake attempts without jumping between scripts. The product also supports WoL over WAN workflows through relay-style routing for scenarios where endpoints sit on different networks.

Pros
  • +Wake scheduling and recurring tasks reduce manual wake handling
  • +Host grouping simplifies bulk wake operations across departments
  • +Operational logs help trace which hosts were targeted and when
  • +WAN-oriented wake workflows support mixed network locations
Cons
  • Directed wake behavior across multi-subnet networks can be network-dependent
  • Fine-grained RBAC and audit log depth are limited for larger IT orgs
  • Wake verification relies on network conditions and endpoint support
  • Inventory and MAC mapping accuracy requires consistent asset data

Best for: Fits when IT teams need scheduled, grouped WoL for mixed LAN and WAN sites with centralized operations.

#7

SolarWinds Dameware Remote Everywhere

enterprise

Remote support platform with wake on LAN support for accessing sleeping Windows devices.

7.2/10
Overall
Features7.2/10
Ease of Use7.1/10
Value7.3/10
Standout feature

Scheduled wake tasks inside Dameware Remote Everywhere let admins coordinate wake timing with remote session workflows from one console.

SolarWinds Dameware Remote Everywhere pairs Wake-on-LAN triggers with remote support workflows in a single admin console, which is a sharper fit than standalone WoL tools for teams that already do device troubleshooting. Scheduled wake tasks let admins plan wake events for endpoints and servers before remote sessions start, using device lists managed in Dameware.

Remote Everywhere also supports remote control after wake, which reduces handoffs between monitoring, ticketing, and out-of-band wake. For WoL over WAN scenarios, it can be routed through its remote access architecture rather than relying only on local subnet broadcast behavior.

Pros
  • +Uses a single console for wake scheduling and remote session start
  • +Supports planned wake windows to align with technician worklists
  • +Centralizes device targeting using the same inventory used for support
  • +Integrates wake timing into incident-driven workflows rather than scripts
Cons
  • Wake capabilities depend on reachability to the WoL sender path
  • Does not include packet-level wake confirmation or ACK tracking
  • WoL setup quality varies by endpoint firmware and network design
  • Automation is weaker than dedicated scanner-and-wake toolchains

Best for: Fits when remote support teams need scheduled wake plus in-console remote access for troubleshooting.

#8

RemotePC

SMB

Remote desktop software with wake on LAN support for accessing sleeping office computers.

6.9/10
Overall
Features7.2/10
Ease of Use6.8/10
Value6.6/10
Standout feature

Wake tasks that feed directly into the RemotePC remote access session flow for automated support handoffs

RemotePC combines wake-on-LAN with a remote access client so IT staff can bring devices online before initiating an interactive session. The workflow centers on device inventory, power-state triggers, and then hands control to the RemotePC connection flow.

RemotePC is designed for off-hours and recurring support tasks where a user is not already connected. It also supports management behaviors that fit mixed network environments where devices may not share the same local segment.

Pros
  • +Wake triggers that link directly into the RemotePC remote session workflow
  • +Centralized device list supports repeated wake and connect operations
  • +Good fit for staff who already run RemotePC for interactive access
  • +Scheduling enables unattended wake-before-support routines
Cons
  • WoL reliability can degrade when devices sit behind misconfigured routing and filters
  • Admin visibility into wake delivery outcomes is limited compared with specialist WoL tools
  • Multi-subnet and broadcast edge cases need careful network validation
  • Wake management depends on keeping device identifiers and credentials aligned

Best for: Fits when teams already use RemotePC and want wake-before-connect routines across office and remote networks.

#9

PRTG Network Monitor

enterprise

Network monitoring suite featuring a dedicated Wake-on-LAN sensor for remote device activation.

6.6/10
Overall
Features6.4/10
Ease of Use6.8/10
Value6.6/10
Standout feature

Alert and sensor trigger workflows combine wake sending with monitoring-based precheck and follow-up visibility.

PRTG Network Monitor from Paessler can send wake events and manage out-of-band power workflows using device discovery plus scheduled monitoring triggers. Its core strength is visibility and alert-driven automation across SNMP, WMI, and agent-based probes, which helps validate wake readiness and device reachability.

For wake-on-LAN use, it focuses on orchestrating and reporting around network reachability rather than acting as a dedicated WoL-only control center. Admins gain centralized monitoring context, but WoL targeting and confirmation still depend on correct network behavior and trigger conditions.

Pros
  • +Centralized monitoring context for correlating wake triggers with device availability
  • +Scheduled triggers can align wake attempts with recurring operational windows
  • +Broad probe coverage supports reachability checks before and after wake
  • +Alert-driven workflows reduce manual wake attempts for flaky endpoints
Cons
  • WoL behavior depends on correct broadcast routing and switch filtering
  • Wake target selection can be harder when many endpoints share similar addressing patterns
  • No purpose-built wake confirmation workflow for per-host ACK delivery
  • Operational tuning is needed to avoid repeated wake attempts during outages

Best for: Fits when WoL needs to be part of a wider monitoring and alert automation workflow.

#10

SoftPerfect Network Scanner

SMB

Multi-protocol network scanner with Wake-on-LAN transmission for IPv4 and IPv6 targets.

6.3/10
Overall
Features6.2/10
Ease of Use6.1/10
Value6.5/10
Standout feature

Device discovery results combine ARP cache polling and probe checks to reduce incorrect MAC targets before magic packets are sent.

SoftPerfect Network Scanner is a Windows network scanning tool that supports MAC address enumeration, UDP broadcast discovery, and per-host reachability checks in one workflow. It generates device inventories by combining ping reachability with ARP cache polling and port and service probes, which helps validate WoL targets before sending magic packets.

The product also supports scripted scanning profiles and export formats that make it workable for scheduled wake task prep. For WoL specifically, it is strongest when administrators want accurate host lists and NIC addressing rather than a full centralized WoL task console.

Pros
  • +ARP cache polling helps identify MAC targets for magic packet sending
  • +Profiles and scheduled scans support repeatable discovery workflows
  • +UDP broadcast discovery reduces manual subnet host listing work
  • +Exportable results make it easier to feed other WoL automation tools
Cons
  • WoL execution and wake confirmation ACK are not provided as a core module
  • Directed broadcast across complex routing requires careful network and scope setup

Best for: Fits when WoL deployments need accurate MAC and reachability inventories as an input to separate wake tooling.

Conclusion

After evaluating 10 telecommunications connectivity, Advanced IP Scanner stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.

Our Top Pick
Advanced IP Scanner

Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.

How to Choose the Right wake on lan software

This buyer's guide covers wake on lan software tools that turn device inventory and network reachability into scheduled or on-demand magic packet sends. The tool set includes Advanced IP Scanner for ARP-driven MAC inventory, Action1 for agent-backed scheduled wake campaigns, Lansweeper for inventory-backed wake tasks, and Domotz is included where centralized WoL operations and discovery workflows matter.

The guide also includes ManageEngine OpUtils for discovery-to-wake automation across subnets, EMCO WakeOnLan for centralized scheduled wake tasks, SolarWinds Dameware Remote Everywhere for wake scheduling inside a remote support console, RemotePC for wake-before-connect routines, PRTG Network Monitor for monitoring-triggered wake workflows, and SoftPerfect Network Scanner for ARP cache polling that reduces incorrect MAC targets before magic packets are sent.

Wake on LAN software that schedules and targets magic packets from discovered device inventories

Wake on lan software sends magic packets to sleeping endpoints using MAC address targeting and requires correct broadcast or directed broadcast routing for consistent delivery. In practice, teams choose tools that pair discovery output with wake execution so MAC enumeration and operational workflows stay accurate across maintenance windows.

Advanced IP Scanner is built around ARP-driven discovery that outputs a ready MAC inventory for immediate wake targeting from the same UI, which fits admins who need a fast LAN inventory-to-WoL workflow without a management server. Action1 shifts the model toward agent-backed endpoint inventory and scheduled wake campaigns, which supports recurring wake operations for managed Windows fleets from one console.

Wake on LAN evaluation points that affect delivery, targeting, and control

Wake on LAN software only succeeds when the targeting input matches what the network can actually reach, because a magic packet still relies on correct MAC targeting and the right broadcast path. Tools that couple discovery output with wake execution reduce stale MAC lists and cut operator rework during maintenance windows.

Control depth matters when wakes run repeatedly across sites, because centralized scheduling, retries, and governance features determine how many missed wakes become recurring tickets. The strongest options align device inventory, wake scheduling, and execution visibility into the same workflow so admins can operate without manual spreadsheet coordination.

  • Inventory-to-wake pairing from the same workflow

    Advanced IP Scanner turns ARP-driven discovery into a MAC inventory that can feed wake sends directly from the discovery UI. Lansweeper ties wake-on-LAN tasks to its continuously updated asset inventory instead of standalone MAC entry lists.

  • Scheduled wake campaigns for maintenance windows

    Action1 runs scheduled wake tasks driven by endpoint inventory so wake campaigns follow maintenance windows without manual triggering. EMCO WakeOnLan coordinates scheduled wake tasks from a centralized console with configurable retries and network scope.

  • Cross-subnet execution behavior and broadcast routing fit

    ManageEngine OpUtils uses discovery-driven endpoint selection for WoL execution across multiple subnets, which reduces static MAC management but still depends on routing behavior. PRTG Network Monitor can combine scheduled triggers with monitoring context, but wake behavior depends on correct broadcast routing and switch filtering.

  • Operational visibility for wake outcomes

    Lansweeper dispatches wake tasks from its inventory, but wake confirmation feedback is limited to packet dispatch visibility. SolarWinds Dameware Remote Everywhere schedules wake inside its remote support console, but it does not provide packet-level wake confirmation or ACK tracking.

  • Directed wake targeting quality before magic packets send

    SoftPerfect Network Scanner reduces incorrect MAC targets by combining ARP cache polling and probe checks before magic packet sending. Advanced IP Scanner similarly uses ARP-driven discovery but keeps wake targeting in the same interface for faster LAN workflows.

Choose based on inventory source, scheduling model, and what the tool can prove after sending

The right wake on lan software depends on whether device identity comes from live discovery on the subnet or from an enrolled endpoint inventory maintained by an agent or management platform. Delivery also depends on broadcast routing design, so selection needs a fit for LAN-only discovery patterns versus multi-subnet execution workflows.

The second fork is whether wake operations need to land inside a broader automation stack like monitoring or remote support. Tools like PRTG Network Monitor connect wake actions to alert and sensor workflows, while SolarWinds Dameware Remote Everywhere schedules wake inside the same console used for remote troubleshooting.

  • Pick an inventory model that matches identity volatility

    If MAC identity must be captured right before wake runs on the same LAN, Advanced IP Scanner uses ARP-driven discovery to produce a ready MAC inventory for immediate wake targeting. If identity stays managed by enrollment and endpoint inventory, Action1 uses agent-backed inventory to support scheduled wake campaigns with fewer MAC mismatch issues.

  • Decide whether wake timing requires scheduled campaigns inside the tool

    For recurring maintenance windows with no operator trigger each time, EMCO WakeOnLan runs scheduled wake tasks tied to imported host inventories. For Windows fleet operations with centralized endpoint inventory management, Action1 scheduled wake tasks support maintenance windows from a single console.

  • Map multi-subnet needs to each tool’s routing sensitivity

    For discovery-to-wake automation across multiple subnets, ManageEngine OpUtils focuses on network discovery-driven endpoint selection for WoL execution but still needs careful routing configuration for cross-subnet wakes. If multi-site execution must work across LAN and WAN targets, Depicus schedules grouped wake tasks centrally but directed wake behavior remains network-dependent.

  • Choose how operators should verify outcomes after packets dispatch

    If operators only need confirmation that a wake packet was dispatched, Lansweeper limits feedback to packet dispatch visibility. If the workflow must start a remote session after wake, RemotePC feeds wake tasks directly into the RemotePC remote access session flow for automated support handoffs.

  • Select the operational surface area based on the admin’s daily workflow

    If wake should be part of a monitoring-driven automation sequence, PRTG Network Monitor combines alert and sensor trigger workflows with wake sending and follow-up visibility. If wake scheduling must align with technician session workflows, SolarWinds Dameware Remote Everywhere schedules wake tasks inside the remote support console.

Who should use each wake on lan software approach

Different wake on lan software tools fit different operating models, because some products treat wake as a one-click LAN action while others treat wake as a scheduled operation tied to inventory, monitoring, or remote support workflows. Selection should match how device identity is tracked and how wake outcomes must be audited by the team.

Teams that need frequent wake-before-action routines benefit from tight integration between wake scheduling and their existing console workflows. Teams focused on repeatable asset inventory targeting benefit from discovery-backed wake tasks that continuously update the target list.

  • IT admins who need fast LAN inventory-to-wake without a management server

    Advanced IP Scanner uses ARP-driven discovery to produce IP and MAC capture for wake targeting from the same UI, which fits quick on-demand LAN workflows.

  • IT teams managing sleeping Windows endpoints with agent-backed device inventory

    Action1 uses agent-backed inventory and scheduled wake campaigns, which supports recurring maintenance windows without operator intervention for each wake.

  • IT teams that want wake tasks driven by continuously updated asset inventory

    Lansweeper runs wake-on-LAN tasks from its discovery-based asset inventory so admins target devices based on inventory updates instead of static MAC lists.

  • Remote support teams that need wake to trigger remote troubleshooting sessions

    SolarWinds Dameware Remote Everywhere schedules wake inside the same console used for remote session work, while RemotePC feeds wake triggers directly into remote access session routines.

  • Teams integrating wake into monitoring and alert automation

    PRTG Network Monitor ties wake sending to alert and sensor trigger workflows so wake attempts can align with recurring operational windows and monitoring context.

Common wake on lan software mistakes that cause missed wakes and wasted time

Wake on LAN failures usually come from targeting errors and routing behavior mismatches, not from the packet send button. The tools in this guide differ in how they generate and validate MAC targets and how much they can confirm after dispatch.

Avoid treating wake scheduling as a standalone action if the identity source is stale or if cross-subnet delivery depends on broadcast routing that the network does not actually permit.

  • Using static MAC lists for devices whose NIC identity changes

    Advanced IP Scanner and Lansweeper both derive targeting from discovery or asset inventory, which reduces manual MAC upkeep. Tools that only accept MAC input without continuous inventory freshness risk repeat misses.

  • Assuming wake works across subnets without validating broadcast routing

    ManageEngine OpUtils and EMCO WakeOnLan both require careful network and routing configuration for cross-subnet wakes, and PRTG Network Monitor also depends on correct broadcast routing and switch filtering. Directed broadcast setups need network design alignment rather than just correct MAC targeting.

  • Confusing packet dispatch with wake confirmation

    Lansweeper provides limited feedback tied to packet dispatch visibility, and SolarWinds Dameware Remote Everywhere does not include packet-level wake confirmation or ACK tracking. Teams that require deliver-and-confirm outcomes must add external monitoring around reachability and device availability.

  • Choosing a tool based only on discovery speed

    SoftPerfect Network Scanner reduces incorrect MAC targets using ARP cache polling and probe checks, but it does not provide wake execution and wake confirmation as a core module. Pair it with a separate wake execution workflow when the goal is just discovery quality.

How We Selected and Ranked These Tools

We evaluated wake on lan software for inventory-to-wake workflow quality, including how Advanced IP Scanner converts ARP-driven host discovery into an actionable MAC inventory in the same UI for immediate wake sends. Features made up 40% of the score because tools like Action1, Lansweeper, and EMCO WakeOnLan depend on scheduled wake tasks tied to their inventory model and operator workflows.

Ease and value each made up 30% because admins must repeat wake operations during maintenance windows without heavy manual MAC maintenance. Advanced IP Scanner ranked highest because it combines fast ARP discovery with wake actions directly from the discovered host list, which removes handoffs between inventory capture and magic packet targeting.

Frequently Asked Questions About wake on lan software

How does SoftPerfect Network Scanner produce a host list usable for Wake on LAN sends?
SoftPerfect Network Scanner builds inventories by combining ARP cache polling with reachability checks and exportable host results. That lets administrators pull MAC address enumeration outputs that can immediately feed Magic Packet sends after discovery cycles.
Which tool fits scheduled wake tasks driven by an endpoint inventory rather than manual MAC entry?
Action1 schedules wake campaigns from a central inventory and a browser-based console. EMCO WakeOnLan also ties wake schedules to importable host inventories, so recurring wake windows run without interactive MAC collection.
When wake broadcasts need to cross subnets, which wake-on-LAN tools handle network scope for discovery-to-execution?
ManageEngine OpUtils focuses on discovery-to-wake automation with subnet and interface awareness for broadcasting scenarios. Depicus Wake on LAN extends the workflow with relay-style handling for WoL over WAN when endpoints do not share the same local segment.
What breaks if Wake on LAN targeting uses stale MAC address data or incorrect reachability assumptions?
SoftPerfect Network Scanner reduces this failure mode by validating host reachability and probing before magic packets are sent. Without that kind of precheck, Action1 or Lansweeper can still queue scheduled wake tasks, but the devices may remain asleep when the MAC inventory no longer matches the active NIC.
How do admin controls differ between Action1 and EMCO WakeOnLan for wake execution management?
Action1 centers administration on controlling who can trigger wakes and reviewing reachability for targeted devices in the console. EMCO WakeOnLan shifts admin control toward configuring wake targets, retries, and network scope rather than delegating remote device-side orchestration.
Where does PRTG Network Monitor fall short compared with dedicated wake-on-LAN management tools?
PRTG Network Monitor excels at alert-driven automation around discovery, SNMP and WMI visibility, and follow-up reporting. It does not replace a dedicated WoL control plane for detailed device targeting and wake confirmation logic, so wake execution depends on correct network behavior and trigger conditions.
How does Dameware Remote Everywhere combine wake events with troubleshooting workflows after endpoints power on?
SolarWinds Dameware Remote Everywhere pairs Wake-on-LAN triggers with remote support workflows inside a single admin console. Its scheduled wake tasks align wake timing with remote session work so technicians can initiate remote control after wake without manual handoffs.
Which tool fits helpdesk teams that want wake-before-connect routines tied to an interactive remote session?
RemotePC is built around wake-before-connect behavior that powers devices up before starting the RemotePC connection flow. This design is different from Lansweeper, which concentrates on discovery-driven asset inventories and wake tasks rather than handing off to a specific remote access session.
What tradeoff occurs when wake operations rely on MAC address enumeration tools instead of a centralized wake console?
SoftPerfect Network Scanner can deliver accurate MAC inventory inputs fast, but it is not a centralized execution and scheduling console for ongoing wake campaigns. Action1 and EMCO WakeOnLan provide the scheduling and console-based management layer, but they depend on their own inventory sources and task configuration instead of ad hoc scan outputs.

Tools reviewed

Primary sources checked during evaluation.

Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.

Logos provided by Logo.dev

Keep exploring

FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS

Not on this list? Let’s fix that.

Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.

Apply for a Listing

WHAT THIS INCLUDES

  • Where buyers compare

    Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.

  • Editorial write-up

    We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.

  • On-page brand presence

    You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.

  • Kept up to date

    We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.