GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Video Games And ConsolesTop 10 Best Video Editors Software of 2026
Top 10 video editors software ranked by editing features, speed, and workflow, with side-by-side comparisons of Premiere Pro, Resolve, VEGAS Pro, and Shotcut.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
VEGAS Pro is the best fit if you’re a solo editor or small team and want quick revision loops with reliable batch exports, while if you need a budget-free local workflow Shotcut is the pragmatic entry, and for macOS-centric teams that live in Apple’s ecosystem Final Cut Pro speeds up timeline iteration.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
VEGAS Pro
Render queue preset handling supports unattended multi-output exports from a single editing session.
Built for fits when solo editors or small teams need fast revision loops with batch exports..
CyberLink PowerDirector
Editor pickMotion tracking applies stabilization and effect placement using a trackable target inside the main timeline.
Built for fits when creators need fast editing throughput with reliable multicam and motion tracking..
Shotcut
Editor pickExtensive filter stack with per-clip control, plus quick timeline integration for edits and exports.
Built for fits when individuals or small teams need a local NLE workflow without a managed studio pipeline..
Comparison Table
VEGAS Pro
SMBWindows-focused professional NLE with audio production tools inherited from Sony's legacy.
Render queue preset handling supports unattended multi-output exports from a single editing session.
VEGAS Pro focuses on hands-on editing inside a single timeline workspace, where scrubbing, trimming, and ripple edits respond predictably for story assembly. The render queue supports queued output so editors can run multiple export presets without reconfiguring each job. Audio mixing is integrated with waveform-style monitoring so editorial changes and mix adjustments stay in the same session. Color and finishing tools are present for day-to-day edits, with LUT support for consistent looks.
A tradeoff is that VEGAS Pro’s automation and extensibility are thinner than in tools that expose deeper programmatic control of timelines and project graphs. VEGAS Pro fits best for editor-driven productions that need fast revision cycles and consistent exports, especially when teams keep creative work in one workstation rather than orchestrating jobs across a shared environment.
- +Frame-accurate scrubbing supports precise trimming for complex edits
- +Render queue enables batch exports with fewer manual export repeats
- +Integrated audio workflow keeps editorial and mix adjustments together
- +Timeline snapping and ripple delete speed up rearranging scenes
- –Automation and API surface are limited for pipeline-level control
- –Collaboration tooling is less comprehensive than in enterprise-targeted editors
- –Advanced finishing workflows can require extra steps for consistency
Freelance video editors
Frequent deadline edits with repeats
Less export rework
Small production teams
Independent edits for short-form
Faster editorial iterations
Show 2 more scenarios
Audio-forward editors
Mix changes alongside picture edits
Tighter audio-picture sync
Integrated audio monitoring supports editorial timing adjustments while reviewing sound placement.
Color-consistency workflows
LUT-based look application
More repeatable finishing
LUT support helps keep grade changes consistent across multiple export versions.
Best for: Fits when solo editors or small teams need fast revision loops with batch exports.
CyberLink PowerDirector
SMBConsumer video editor with AI-powered tools and 360-degree editing support.
Motion tracking applies stabilization and effect placement using a trackable target inside the main timeline.
PowerDirector supports an NLE timeline with multi-track editing, trimming tools, and frame-accurate scrubbing for timeline navigation. Motion tracking and compositing effects can be applied without leaving the main editing window, which reduces handoff overhead. Hardware acceleration for preview and rendering can shorten iteration loops when working with large files.
A key tradeoff is that PowerDirector’s advanced finishing and color toolset does not match the depth of editing suites aimed at high-end color pipelines. PowerDirector is a strong match for family video, creator content, and event recaps where speed to publish matters more than deep grade control.
- +Hardware-accelerated preview and export reduce waiting during edits
- +Multicam editing supports quick angle switching for multi-camera shoots
- +Motion tracking effects stay in the timeline workflow
- +Render queue batching helps manage overnight or multi-file exports
- –Color grading tools are less granular than dedicated color-focused workflows
- –Some advanced effects require extra steps compared with node-based compositing
Wedding and event editors
Cut multi-angle highlights
Faster highlight turnaround
YouTube and short-form creators
Iterate titles and effects quickly
Cleaner pacing
Show 1 more scenario
Small production teams
Batch exports for client delivery
Less manual export work
Render queue batching supports unattended output for multiple deliverables from one project.
Best for: Fits when creators need fast editing throughput with reliable multicam and motion tracking.
Shotcut
SMBFree cross-platform video editor with wide format support via FFmpeg.
Extensive filter stack with per-clip control, plus quick timeline integration for edits and exports.
Shotcut’s editing model centers on a conventional NLE timeline plus a filter stack for video and audio, which keeps most effects scoped to clips and tracks. Frame-accurate scrubbing and timeline snapping help with tight trim points, and keyframe controls support interpolation for motion and adjustment filters. Media handling includes playlist-style organization and import options that work well for asset-heavy projects where editing and quick iteration matter.
A key tradeoff is that advanced finishing features found in high-end editors are less complete, especially for color-centric workflows and effects built around complex compositor graphs. Shotcut fits best when editors need a local, script-free workflow for edits, basic grading, and effect-heavy exports, such as turning multiclip takes into short deliverables with repeatable settings.
- +Local editing across Windows, macOS, and Linux without an external pipeline
- +Filter-based effects attach to clips and playback stays responsive during edits
- +Frame-accurate scrubbing and timeline snapping improve trim precision
- +Project files support straightforward sharing across machines
- –Advanced color workflows are less deep than in pro-grade NLEs
- –Compositing complexity is limited compared with node-based editors
- –Effect controls can feel scattered across panels on larger projects
- –Some codec and hardware acceleration behaviors vary by system
Indie editors and solo creators
Quick edits and deliverable exports
Faster turnaround on short videos
Linux-first production teams
Cross-platform editing on the same project
Less friction between workstations
Show 2 more scenarios
Podcast and audio-first editors
Audio cleanup and mix for video
Cleaner tracks for publication
Audio filters and timeline trimming support tight edits around waveform-level timing needs.
Event recap editors
Multicam assembly into short highlight reels
Consistent edits across episodes
Timeline trimming and snapping support quick assembly of select moments into a final sequence.
Best for: Fits when individuals or small teams need a local NLE workflow without a managed studio pipeline.
Final Cut Pro
enterpriseApple's professional video editor optimized for macOS and Apple Silicon hardware.
Magnetic timeline behavior that combines clip replacement and ripple edits with automatic scene ordering.
Final Cut Pro targets editors who want tight macOS-native performance for day-to-day timeline work. The magnetic timeline supports automatic clip placement and ripple behaviors, while background rendering keeps playback responsive during edits.
It also provides media management via Libraries, including smart collections that stay updated as edits evolve. Motion and Compressor integrate into the Apple workflow for effects, exports, and delivery-ready output.
- +Magnetic timeline enforces clip ordering and reduces manual slip edits
- +Background rendering improves scrubbing responsiveness during complex sequences
- +Libraries plus smart collections keep media organization tied to editing
- +Apple ecosystem effects and export tooling fit macOS-centric workflows
- –Team handoff to Windows or non-Apple pipelines can be harder
- –Advanced interchange with external NLEs is less consistent than specialist tools
- –Some effects control is deeper in dedicated compositing editors
- –Performance depends on Apple hardware and macOS graphics support
Best for: Fits when macOS editors need fast timeline iteration with strong library organization and Apple workflow integration.
Avid Media Composer
enterpriseBroadcast and film industry NLE with advanced media management and collaborative workflows.
Media Composer’s media-managed timeline workflow keeps source relinks and conform iterations consistent across offline-to-online rounds.
Avid Media Composer executes frame-accurate timeline editing with a media-managed workflow designed for broadcast and post-production. Its core capabilities center on AAF and XML interchange, deep offline-to-online editing patterns, and robust audio editorial features for quick assembly and revision.
The software supports proxy-based editing and hardware-assisted playback to keep responsiveness during complex timeline work. Extensibility exists through Avid ecosystem tools and integrations that fit established station and studio pipelines.
- +Frame-accurate scrubbing keeps edits predictable on long timelines
- +Strong AAF and XML interchange supports enterprise interchange workflows
- +Track-based audio editing tools support detailed assembly and cleanup
- +Proxy workflow supports practical offline-to-online post-production
- –Steeper learning curve than timeline-first consumer NLEs
- –Complex project media management can slow down quick ad-hoc edits
- –Multicam editing depth depends on ingest and setup choices
- –Automation and API options are limited for custom pipeline control
Best for: Fits when post teams need frame-accurate edits and interchange for established broadcast workflows.
Filmora
SMBConsumer-friendly video editor with drag-and-drop effects and templates.
Large built-in effect and template library that works directly inside the NLE timeline workflow.
Filmora targets creators who want fast, guided editing for common social formats, with timeline tools plus built-in content effects and templates. It supports multi-track timelines with trimming, ripple edits, transitions, and keyframed motion effects, and it includes color tools like LUT-based looks and basic grading controls.
The editor focuses on speed-to-output workflows, including proxy-style handling for smoother playback and export pipelines aimed at common delivery formats. Compared with pro NLEs, Filmora has fewer deep customization points for complex node-free compositing and advanced interchange workflows.
- +Effect and template library reduces setup time for social edits
- +Keyframed motion and built-in titles cover many creator-grade use cases
- +Proxy-style workflow helps keep timeline playback manageable on weaker systems
- +Export presets map well to common delivery targets
- –Limited depth for advanced compositing compared with node-based editors
- –Fewer automation and integration options than pro NLEs
Best for: Fits when short-form creators need quick editing and repeatable effects without deep pipeline engineering.
Lightworks
SMBCross-platform NLE with a heritage in feature film editing.
Frame-accurate edit control with timeline behavior tuned for consistent trimming across extended projects.
Lightworks is built for high-precision editing with a timeline workflow designed around repeatable finishing steps. Its distinctive strength is a mature offline edit process that stays focused on frame-accurate trimming and edit control for long projects.
The editor supports industry interchange via EDL and XML, plus exports that target professional post pipelines. Automation for batch finishing is less front-and-center than in code-driven tools, so throughput planning matters for teams with heavy volume.
- +Frame-accurate timeline control supports precise trims and consistent output
- +EDL and XML interchange supports handoff to broader post pipelines
- +Audio monitoring and editing stay responsive during timeline work
- +Multi-monitor editing workflow supports review and line-level passes
- –Interface has a steep learning curve versus modern NLE ribbon layouts
- –Node-based compositing depth is limited compared with dedicated compositor-first tools
- –Extending workflows via API and automation is not a primary editing surface
- –Some specialized finishing tasks require more manual timeline discipline
Best for: Fits when post teams need frame-precise edits and interchange-based handoffs to finishing.
Kdenlive
SMBOpen-source multi-track video editor built on the MLT framework.
Node-based compositing inside the timeline that keeps effect graphs editable without baking intermediate results.
Kdenlive is a nonlinear editor built for frame-accurate timeline editing with a modular toolbox and keyboard-first workflows. The editor supports timeline compositing with node-based effects, proxy workflow for smoother scrubbing, and hardware acceleration options for faster playback and renders.
Media handling includes a render queue for batch exports, plus clip management features like trimming, snapping, and ripple operations on the timeline. Audio editing covers waveform-based editing and common mixing moves like ducking behavior and fade automation.
- +Node-based compositing workflow keeps effect chains editable over time
- +Render queue supports batch exports without manual re-exporting
- +Proxy workflow improves responsiveness during heavy edits
- +Hardware acceleration options can reduce playback stutter
- –Advanced effects coverage can lag behind premium editors
- –Node-based compositing setup requires more timeline discipline
- –Multicam editing tools are limited compared with top commercial NLEs
- –Color management and grading tooling is less comprehensive for pro pipelines
Best for: Fits when independent editors want a configurable timeline workflow with proxies and queue-based exports.
OpenShot
SMBOpen-source video editor focused on simplicity and ease of use.
Keyframe animation for clip properties runs directly on the timeline without switching to node-based compositing.
OpenShot edits video via a traditional NLE timeline with track-based clips and straightforward transitions. It includes keyframe animation for common properties, plus built-in tools for motion effects, titles, and simple compositing.
The workflow centers on preview, trimming, and exporting without requiring a node graph for most edits. Format support is practical for everyday footage, but deeper color grading and advanced finishing tools stay limited compared with premium NLEs.
- +Timeline editing with clip trimming and snapping is easy to learn
- +Keyframe animation supports property changes over time without node editing
- +Built-in title and transition tools cover common social and documentary edits
- +Export presets cover frequent resolutions and codecs for quick delivery
- –Advanced color grading controls and monitoring tools are limited
- –Effects and compositing depth trail node-based editors for complex shots
- –Timeline performance can degrade with heavier projects and many layers
- –Codec handling can be inconsistent across source formats
Best for: Fits when quick timeline edits and basic effects matter more than advanced grading and finishing controls.
Blender
enterpriseOpen-source 3D creation suite with a built-in video sequence editor.
Node-based compositing drives pixel-accurate effects tied directly to the edited timeline in the same project.
Blender fits editors who want a single tool that covers both editing and full 3D production. Its video editor centers on a nonlinear timeline plus node-based compositing for effects, while render output supports common delivery workflows.
Frame-accurate scrubbing and timeline playback integrate with Blender’s image sequence and video decoding to support editorial iteration. For color and finishing, Blender’s compositor nodes provide configurable grading and effect stacks that extend beyond typical NLE templates.
- +Timeline editing plus node-based compositing in one project
- +Deterministic effects via compositor node graphs and renderable output
- +Built-in 3D pipeline for motion, lighting, and compositing
- +Frame-accurate scrubbing supports iterative editorial changes
- –Editing UX lags dedicated NLE tools for high-speed day-to-day cutting
- –Codec interoperability can require transcodes and careful ingest choices
- –Advanced workflows often depend on compositor graph setup discipline
- –Motion tracking and effects coverage can be slower for editorial-scale tasks
Best for: Fits when 3D and compositing are tightly coupled to editorial, not handled as separate toolchains.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 video games and consoles, VEGAS Pro stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right video editors software
Video editors software spans consumer NLEs like Final Cut Pro and OpenShot, broadcast-oriented editors like Avid Media Composer, and hybrid editorial plus compositing workflows like Blender. This guide narrows the category to how each editor handles speed in daily cutting, feature depth for complex timelines, and practical output loops.
The coverage includes VEGAS Pro, CyberLink PowerDirector, Shotcut, Final Cut Pro, Avid Media Composer, Filmora, Lightworks, Kdenlive, OpenShot, and Blender. Each section ties workflow behavior to concrete mechanisms such as render queue batch exports, timeline timing control, and node-based effect graph editing.
Video editors software for fast timeline cutting, batch exports, and complex post workflows
Video editors software lets editors arrange clips on an NLE timeline, apply effects, and render finished exports while managing trimming precision, media relinks, and interchange between tools. Editors like VEGAS Pro focus on render queue preset handling that supports unattended multi-output exports from a single editing session.
Other products emphasize different workflow structure, including Avid Media Composer media-managed timelines built to keep source relinks and conform iterations consistent across offline-to-online rounds. Node-based compositing also varies by platform, with Kdenlive and Blender keeping editable effect graphs tied to the editorial timeline. Across the set, standout capability usually appears in how trimming stays frame-accurate and how batch export or interchange reduces repeat work during revisions.
What to Compare in Video Editors Software for Throughput and Timeline Control
Speed in daily cutting depends on how the editor handles timeline scrubbing, background rendering, and export scheduling during revisions. Feature depth depends on whether complex effects stay editable over time or become baked into intermediate results.
Batch export behavior also changes how many times editors repeat manual export steps. Interchange behavior then determines whether conform and relink iterations stay consistent across editorial and finishing tools.
Batch export scheduling from the timeline session
VEGAS Pro’s render queue preset handling supports unattended multi-output exports from a single editing session. Kdenlive also uses a render queue for batch exports, while VEGAS Pro focuses its distinction on preset handling that reduces manual repeat exports.
Frame-accurate trimming behavior for long or complex edits
Avid Media Composer keeps trimming predictable with frame-accurate scrubbing across media-managed timeline rounds. Lightworks also emphasizes frame-accurate edit control tuned for consistent trimming across extended projects.
How effect graphs stay editable versus baked results
Kdenlive and Blender keep a node-based compositing workflow editable over time instead of forcing intermediate baking. CyberLink PowerDirector relies more on effect application steps inside the main timeline and routes motion tracking through trackable targets rather than an editable node graph.
Interchange coverage for broadcast-style handoffs
Avid Media Composer supports strong AAF and XML interchange for enterprise interchange workflows. Lightworks provides EDL and XML interchange designed for handoffs to broader post pipelines.
Motion tracking workflow tied to timeline placement
CyberLink PowerDirector uses motion tracking that applies stabilization and effect placement using a trackable target inside the main timeline. VEGAS Pro focuses its standout on render queue automation rather than timeline-integrated trackable motion placement.
Timeline behavior that reduces manual slip edits
Final Cut Pro’s magnetic timeline behavior combines clip replacement and ripple edits with automatic scene ordering. Shotcut focuses on a responsive local NLE workflow with filter-based effects, which does not provide the same magnetic ordering behavior.
How to Choose Video Editors Software by Workflow Model and Output Loop
The decision should start with the workflow model that matches the editing loop. Some editors optimize trimming precision and interchange for offline-to-online rounds, while others optimize for rapid revision cycles with export batching or timeline-first effects.
A second decision should cover how effects remain modifiable after early choices. Editors with node-based compositing keep effect graphs editable in the same project, while timeline-centric editors may require extra steps when effects grow more complex.
Map the revision loop to export automation
Choose VEGAS Pro if the revision loop needs unattended multi-output exports driven by render queue preset handling from a single editing session. Choose Kdenlive if batch exports from the render queue matter, but timeline-local operation and proxy workflows also need to stay configurable without a managed studio pipeline.
Choose a trimming and conform philosophy before effect depth
Choose Avid Media Composer for media-managed timelines that keep source relinks and conform iterations consistent across offline-to-online rounds. Choose Lightworks if interchange-based handoffs and frame-precise edit control for trimming consistency are the primary constraints.
Decide whether effects must stay editable as a graph
Choose Blender or Kdenlive when effect graphs must remain editable over time through node-based compositing tied to the edited timeline in the same project. Choose CyberLink PowerDirector when the workflow prioritizes motion tracking with stabilization and effect placement using trackable targets inside the main timeline.
Align timeline behavior to how clips are reorganized
Choose Final Cut Pro when editors want magnetic timeline behavior that enforces clip ordering and reduces manual slip edits through scene-aware ordering. Choose VEGAS Pro when the core bottleneck is export repetition and batch output scheduling rather than scene-aware timeline reordering.
Validate complexity ceilings for compositing and grading
Choose a node-based editor when compositing complexity is expected to rise beyond timeline-first effects, since Kdenlive and Blender keep editable node graphs rather than baking intermediate results. Choose Shotcut or Filmora when the workflow stays closer to filter stacks or built-in effect and template libraries inside the timeline.
Who Video Editors Software Fits Based on Speed, Interchange, and Effects Depth
Different editors in this category target different production structures. Some tools fit independent or small-team editing with local workflows and quick effect application, while others target post teams that need predictable interchange and conform behavior.
Effect depth requirements also split the audience. Node-based compositing workflows match editors who need edit-time modifiability of complex effects, while timeline-centric tools match creators who need fast feature-driven iteration.
Solo editors and small teams running fast revision loops
VEGAS Pro fits revision loops that require unattended multi-output exports with render queue preset handling that reduces repeat manual export steps. Shotcut also fits local editing across Windows, macOS, and Linux with responsive clip-attached filter effects.
Post teams doing offline-to-online interchange and conform iterations
Avid Media Composer fits offline-to-online rounds because media-managed timeline behavior keeps source relinks and conform iterations consistent. Lightworks fits finishing handoffs that depend on EDL and XML interchange plus frame-accurate edit control.
Editors who rely on node-based effect graph iteration
Kdenlive fits when node-based compositing inside the timeline must stay editable without baking intermediate results. Blender fits when timeline editing and node-based compositing must stay in the same project with deterministic effects via node graphs.
Creators who need motion tracking and quick multicam switching
CyberLink PowerDirector fits motion tracking workflows that apply stabilization and effect placement from trackable targets inside the main timeline. It also fits multicam editing that supports quick angle switching for multi-camera shoots.
macOS editors focused on timeline reorganization speed
Final Cut Pro fits editors who want magnetic timeline behavior that combines clip replacement with ripple edits and automatic scene ordering. That ordering behavior reduces manual slip edits during ongoing cuts.
Common Pitfalls When Buying Video Editors Software
Buying mistakes usually come from selecting an editor for its headline effects without verifying how it handles export automation, trimming precision, and handoff interchange. Another frequent issue comes from assuming all editors preserve complex effects as editable graphs.
The category also splits between timeline-first editing and node-first compositing. Picking the wrong workflow model increases rework when shots get more complex mid-project.
Assuming render queue batch export exists without checking preset-driven automation behavior
VEGAS Pro emphasizes render queue preset handling for unattended multi-output exports, which reduces manual export repeats. Kdenlive supports render queue batch exports, but editors should verify that the preset workflow matches the number of outputs needed per revision.
Choosing based on easy timeline trimming but ignoring frame-accurate behavior for long timelines
Avid Media Composer keeps frame-accurate scrubbing predictable on long timelines and across media-managed relinks. Lightworks also emphasizes frame-accurate timeline control, which matters when trimming consistency must survive handoffs.
Expecting deep compositing in timeline-first editors without a node graph workflow
Kdenlive and Blender keep node-based compositing editable over time, which supports late changes to complex effect chains. CyberLink PowerDirector can handle advanced effects, but it routes motion tracking through trackable targets rather than offering the same editable node graph model.
Buying for interchange without matching the specific handoff format support
Avid Media Composer is designed around AAF and XML interchange, which supports enterprise interchange workflows. Lightworks provides EDL and XML interchange, so broadcast pipelines that require AAF-based interchange may not map cleanly.
Overestimating workflow continuity when moving projects between platform pipelines
Final Cut Pro magnetic timeline behavior can improve ordering on macOS, but team handoff to Windows or non-Apple pipelines can be harder. Shotcut and Kdenlive provide local editing across multiple operating systems, which reduces platform friction for distributed teams.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated VEGAS Pro, CyberLink PowerDirector, Shotcut, Final Cut Pro, Avid Media Composer, Filmora, Lightworks, Kdenlive, OpenShot, and Blender using feature coverage at 40% and ease plus value at 30% each. VEGAS Pro separated itself through render queue preset handling that supports unattended multi-output exports from a single editing session, which directly reduces manual export repeats during revisions.
Timeline trimming precision also received emphasis through frame-accurate scrubbing behavior in VEGAS Pro’s feature set and comparable frame-accurate control in Avid Media Composer and Lightworks. Node-based compositing and interchange behavior carried additional weight when products differentiated the workflow model through editable effect graphs or format-focused handoffs.
Frequently Asked Questions About video editors software
How do Premiere Pro, Resolve, and other top editors handle frame-accurate scrubbing on large timelines?
Which editors offer render queue batching for unattended exports from one editing session?
When do node-based compositing workflows matter more than a track-based timeline for finishing?
Which tool is better for multicam editing with trackable motion effects built in?
What breaks if a team relies on AAF or XML interchange for round-tripping edits?
How does media management differ between library-based workflows and manual source relinking?
Which editors support waveform-based audio editing and automation for mixing tasks like audio ducking?
How do proxy workflows affect playback responsiveness during heavy timeline work?
How do security and admin controls differ for studio pipelines that require RBAC and audit logging?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Video Games And Consoles alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of video games and consoles tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare video games and consoles tools→