Commissioned Research
Top 10 Best Social Network Software of 2026

GITNUXSOFTWARE REVIEW

Communication Media

Top 10 Best Social Network Software of 2026

An editorial roundup of social network software that compares Mighty Networks, eXo Platform, and Mastodon for community teams. Helps shortlist options.

20 min readUpdated Editorially scoped research
How we ranked these tools
01Editorial Scope

Vendors set the topic, but our editors set the inclusion criteria and the evaluation framework before research starts.

02Source Research

Search agents gather the source set and the review record, including transcriptions of video reviews and podcasts.

Read our full methodology →

Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%

Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page. This does not influence our reviews. Editorial policy

Social network software governs how communities publish content, manage memberships, and connect through federated or hosted deployment models. This comparison helps technical evaluators weigh options like API integration, automation workflows, and governance controls such as roles and audit trails against build-versus-host tradeoffs.

Mighty Networks is the best choice for brand or education teams that need a hosted community with structured learning, because membership and learning experiences flow through the same feed and member lifecycle. eXo Platform is a strong alternative for enterprises needing controlled internal communities, since configurable moderation queues support group-scoped review and action.

Editor’s top 3 picks

Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.

Editor pick
1

Mighty Networks

Native membership and learning experiences share the same community feed and member lifecycle flow.

Best for: Fits when a brand or education team needs a branded community plus structured learning content and operator moderation.

2

eXo Platform

Editor pick

Moderation queues with configurable access controls for group-scoped review and action on user-generated content.

Best for: Fits when enterprises need controlled internal communities with SSO, moderation queues, and API driven integrations.

3

Mastodon

Editor pick

ActivityPub federation lets accounts interact across independent servers while keeping local admin policy boundaries.

Best for: Fits when organizations need federated social communication with instance-level control over federation and moderation.

Comparison Table

1
Mighty NetworksBest overall
SMB
9.5/10
Overall
2
enterprise
8.7/10
Overall
3
open source
8.6/10
Overall
4
8.5/10
Overall
5
8.1/10
Overall
6
enterprise
7.7/10
Overall
7
open source
7.5/10
Overall
8
7.3/10
Overall
9
enterprise
6.8/10
Overall
10
6.7/10
Overall
#1

Mighty Networks

SMB

Hosted platform for creating branded community networks with courses, events, and paid memberships.

9.5/10
Overall
Features9.5/10
Ease of Use9.5/10
Value9.5/10
Standout feature

Native membership and learning experiences share the same community feed and member lifecycle flow.

Mighty Networks organizes community activity into feed-style posting, with member directory browsing, profile fields, and space-based organization for different community areas. Built-in moderation features help staff handle member access, manage content visibility, and keep discussions on track. Content can be structured as posts, guides, and learning-like modules so a community can mix discussion with structured material.

A key tradeoff is that Mighty Networks focuses on a hosted community model rather than federation or peer-to-peer interoperability, which limits cross-network reach compared with ActivityPub-based options. It fits situations where a brand or education team needs a cohesive branded community experience, plus automation through integrations for member lifecycle and notification flows.

Pros
  • +Community spaces and feed-style posting support multi-topic engagement
  • +Member directory and profile pages improve discoverability inside the community
  • +Moderation workflows cover day-to-day operator tasks
  • +Integrations support automation for onboarding and content operations
Cons
  • –Hosted community approach limits federation and external social interoperability
  • –Customization requires workflow planning instead of deep server-level control
Use scenarios
  • Membership programs teams

    Cohort communities with gated discussions

    Higher retention from gated access

  • Community managers

    Moderated groups with operator workflows

    Fewer policy-handling escalations

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Education operators

    Feed-driven learning with events

    More consistent engagement

    Learning materials and event updates appear alongside discussion posts in one member experience.

  • Systems integrators

    Automated onboarding and notifications

    Less manual member operations

    Integrations connect external user events to community actions such as welcoming and access updates.

Best for: Fits when a brand or education team needs a branded community plus structured learning content and operator moderation.

#2

eXo Platform

enterprise

Digital workplace platform with enterprise social networking features including activity feeds, spaces, and collaboration tools.

8.7/10
Overall
Features8.7/10
Ease of Use8.7/10
Value8.7/10
Standout feature

Moderation queues with configurable access controls for group-scoped review and action on user-generated content.

eXo Platform is built for organized community use with group spaces, profile fields, and configurable feeds that connect actions to a member directory. Moderation is handled via defined queues for reviewing and taking action on user-generated content, plus access rules that gate who can post or manage content. Extensibility supports custom components that can hook into the user experience around feeds, notifications, and engagement loops. API support plus event-driven integration via webhooks helps connect external systems for content workflows and identity binding.

A key tradeoff is heavier enterprise governance. Tight control and customization increase implementation effort compared with simpler federated or lightweight microblog tools. This fit is strongest when organizations need internal community controls, delegated moderation, and integration with corporate identity and case workflow systems.

Pros
  • +Role-based permissions support delegated group moderation and restricted posting
  • +Activity streams and group spaces provide structured feeds beyond basic timelines
  • +OAuth2 SSO integration supports enterprise identity and centralized authentication
  • +Webhook event triggers enable external workflow automation around social actions
Cons
  • –Enterprise configuration increases rollout time for teams without admin support
  • –Custom UI and feature extensions require development resources to maintain
  • –Feed and content governance tuning needs ongoing operational oversight
  • –Federated publishing requires additional design work versus native federation
Use scenarios
  • IT governance teams

    Centralized access control for community content

    Reduced policy violations

  • Community operations teams

    Triage and action on content reports

    Faster compliance handling

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Enterprise integration teams

    Automate workflows from social activity

    Automated downstream processing

    Webhook event triggers connect external systems to social actions like posts and approvals.

  • Identity and access teams

    Bind users to corporate authentication

    Lower user provisioning friction

    OAuth2 SSO supports centralized sign-in and identity-driven access decisions.

Best for: Fits when enterprises need controlled internal communities with SSO, moderation queues, and API driven integrations.

#3

Mastodon

open source

Open source self-hostable social networking software supporting federated microblogging and community servers.

8.6/10
Overall
Features8.6/10
Ease of Use8.6/10
Value8.6/10
Standout feature

ActivityPub federation lets accounts interact across independent servers while keeping local admin policy boundaries.

Mastodon differentiates from typical social networks by running as federated instances that follow ActivityPub, so servers interoperate across organizations. It provides an activity stream with per-post visibility controls, public and unlisted posts, and content warnings that require interaction to view.

Moderation is handled through instance policies plus tools like per-account blocking and reporting workflows, with admin-level settings for federation behavior. The admin surface includes configuration for media, signup, and federation reach, while the user experience includes custom timelines via lists and hashtag browsing.

Pros
  • +Federated ActivityPub model enables cross-instance following without migrating accounts
  • +Hashtag timelines and lists support structured browsing beyond a single newsfeed
  • +Content warnings and visibility controls are built into the posting workflow
  • +Admin controls cover federation, signup policy, and media handling settings
Cons
  • –Instance policies create inconsistent moderation and federation behavior across servers
  • –API automation is narrower than fully commercial social stacks for some workflows
  • –Lifecycle management of an instance requires ongoing operational oversight
  • –Client diversity means feature parity can vary between mobile and desktop apps
Use scenarios
  • technical teams and developers

    Run federated self-hosted social network

    Operational control of community

  • developers building clients

    Integrate social actions via APIs

    Programmatic posting workflows

Show 2 more scenarios
  • community members and readers

    Read feeds without algorithm ranking

    Predictable feed behavior

    Use follow-based home, local, and federated timelines to view updates from server activity.

  • organizations and creators

    Publish public updates across federation

    Cross-server reach

    Share short announcements and replies that reach followers on other connected servers.

Best for: Fits when organizations need federated social communication with instance-level control over federation and moderation.

#4

Bettermode

SMB

Community experience platform for building branded social spaces with discussions, ideation, and gamification.

8.5/10
Overall
Features8.5/10
Ease of Use8.5/10
Value8.5/10
Standout feature

Built-in campaign and rewards mechanics that tie engagement goals to community participation flows.

Bettermode provides a structured community UI with group areas, a member directory, and an activity feed that helps teams drive participation. Admin workflows support moderation queues and review flows so teams can manage posts without relying on ad hoc actions. OAuth2 SSO and role-based access controls support governance patterns for organizations that need controlled membership.

Pros
  • +Campaign and rewards modules create repeatable engagement loops
  • +Moderation review flows reduce reliance on manual post handling
  • +Member directory plus activity visibility improves discovery across groups
  • +Role-based access supports controlled community administration
Cons
  • –Not federation-first, so federation interoperability is limited
  • –Community customization can require admin setup time and planning
Use scenarios
  • Community operations teams

    Run moderated group discussions at scale

    Faster review and fewer missed posts

  • Marketing and growth teams

    Drive participation with rewards programs

    Higher sustained participation

Show 1 more scenario
  • Platform and security teams

    Centralize access with identity controls

    Simplified access governance

    OAuth2 SSO and role-based access controls support managed onboarding and admin separation.

Best for: Fits when organizations need governed community spaces with moderation workflows and engagement programs.

#5

SocialEngine

SMB

Standalone PHP platform for creating custom social networks with member profiles, groups, and content sharing.

8.1/10
Overall
Features8.1/10
Ease of Use8.0/10
Value8.2/10
Standout feature

Modular add-on architecture for extending member, content, and UI components without rebuilding the application from scratch.

SocialEngine is a white-label community platform for building a branded social network with custom pages, member profiles, and groups. It supports core social workflows such as user-generated content, activity feeds, member directories, and private messaging.

Pros
  • +White-label theming supports branded navigation, pages, and UI layouts
  • +Built-in groups, member directory, and activity stream cover core social primitives
  • +Moderation tooling includes queues and workflow controls for content review
  • +Extensibility supports adding functionality without replacing the whole app
Cons
  • –Advanced configuration and governance require careful admin planning
  • –Federation support for ActivityPub workflows is not a primary native path
  • –Complex integrations depend on custom development and module maintenance
  • –Automation via webhooks and event triggers can require implementation work
Use scenarios
  • organizations launching communities

    Create white-label social network

    Brand-aligned community

  • operators of niche communities

    Run identity-focused member spaces

    Member experience matches audience

Show 2 more scenarios
  • developer teams

    Add custom profile and workflows

    Platform adapted to rules

    Use plugins and development hooks to extend profile logic and content event workflows.

  • dating site operators

    Operate a dating-focused network

    Dating community with controls

    Use profiles, search, and messaging with customizable workflows to run matchmaking experiences.

Best for: Fits when a team needs a branded community site with groups, UGC workflows, and moderation inside one stack.

#6

HumHub

enterprise

Open source social network software for creating self-hosted social intranets and community platforms.

7.7/10
Overall
Features7.7/10
Ease of Use7.7/10
Value7.7/10
Standout feature

HumHub’s app framework lets administrators install and configure modules that extend social features inside the same UI and permissions model.

HumHub supports a branded, group-centric social network with activity streams, member directories, and modular apps that add private messaging and community features. It runs as an on-premises or cloud deployment and uses role-based permissions to govern groups, content visibility, and moderation actions.

Pros
  • +Group-first architecture with activity streams and member directories
  • +Role-based access controls for group content and moderation boundaries
  • +Extensible module system for private messaging and community add-ons
  • +On-premises deployment option for data control and custom governance
Cons
  • –Admin configuration can require careful setup of permissions by group
  • –Federation support is limited for organizations expecting ActivityPub interoperability
  • –Advanced automation depends more on add-ons than on a consistent workflow layer
  • –API and webhook coverage is narrower than buyer expectations for heavy integration
Use scenarios
  • developers and product teams

    Extend network with modules and themes

    Workflow-specific social platform

  • internal communications teams

    Run employee social intranet spaces

    Centralized employee community

Show 2 more scenarios
  • portal administrators

    Launch branded community portal

    Configurable portal for communities

    Publish spaces with branded layouts, profiles, activity feeds, and controlled groups for multiple audiences.

  • knowledge managers and distributed teams

    Maintain organized knowledge exchange

    Organized discussions and references

    Use pages, files, and threaded discussions so group knowledge stays searchable within spaces.

Best for: Fits when organizations need a configurable on-prem social network with group permissions and add-on extensibility.

#7

Diaspora

open source

Open source decentralized social networking software supporting self-hosted pods with federation.

7.5/10
Overall
Features7.5/10
Ease of Use7.5/10
Value7.5/10
Standout feature

Diaspora’s profile and relationship model centers on user-managed social graphs across federated servers.

Diaspora is a decentralized social network server software with federation that supports ActivityPub-style interactions between instances. It focuses on user-controlled relationships, tag-based public discovery surfaces, and server-side moderation workflows.

Pros
  • +Federated architecture supports cross-instance identity and content sharing
  • +Granular post visibility and relationship controls reduce accidental overexposure
  • +Server-side moderation tools support community enforcement workflows
  • +API-style HTTP endpoints enable custom integrations and automation
Cons
  • –Federation breadth can be narrower than newer ActivityPub-focused peers
  • –Admin operations require technical familiarity with self-hosted deployments
  • –Client experience and UI polish can lag behind modern microblog apps
  • –Workflow tooling for complex community operations is less automation-heavy
Use scenarios
  • independent server operators

    Run decentralized federated social network

    Federated relationships across servers

  • community moderators

    Moderate user relationships and content

    Consistent moderation on instance

Show 2 more scenarios
  • developers integrating identity and automation

    Automate actions via HTTP endpoints

    Automated server-side workflows

    Trigger automation using HTTP endpoints tied to identity and content publishing workflows.

  • community members and users

    Find posts by tags and relationships

    Targeted discovery via tags

    Rely on tag-based discovery surfaces and controlled relationship links for public interactions.

Best for: Fits when an organization needs a self-hosted, federation-capable social instance with policy-driven moderation.

#8

Oxwall

SMB

Open source PHP platform for building social networking websites with plugins for profiles, photos, and groups.

7.3/10
Overall
Features7.3/10
Ease of Use7.3/10
Value7.3/10
Standout feature

Add-on driven extensibility that turns missing social modules into configurable plugins without replacing the core.

Oxwall is social network software built around modular community features like profiles, activity feeds, and group capabilities. It is designed for teams that need extensibility through plugins and customization of site themes and user experience.

Pros
  • +Plugin-based feature expansion through an active add-on ecosystem
  • +Role and permission controls for separating member capabilities
  • +Theme customization supports branded community front ends
  • +Built-in community modules cover profiles, groups, and activity feeds
Cons
  • –Federation and ActivityPub interoperability are not a native focus
  • –API surface depends heavily on installed plugins
  • –Admin governance for complex moderation workflows needs add-on support
  • –Upgrades can require extra testing when custom themes and plugins diverge
Use scenarios
  • organizations building communities

    Launch branded social site

    Site-specific social network

  • php developers and implementers

    Extend with plugins and custom fields

    Tailored community features

Show 2 more scenarios
  • dating marketplace teams

    Build dating marketplace foundation

    Community-style dating marketplace

    Use community modules for member discovery and interaction to support a dating marketplace model.

  • dating agencies and operators

    Run niche branded dating community

    Control over dating workflows

    Configure moderation and matchmaking extensions around member profiles and messaging workflows.

Best for: Fits when a team wants a white-label style community build with add-on driven features.

#9

Elgg

enterprise

Open source social networking framework for building custom social network applications in PHP.

6.8/10
Overall
Features6.8/10
Ease of Use6.8/10
Value6.8/10
Standout feature

Permission-driven modular groups with extensible profile fields that plugins can hook into for new community features.

Elgg is social network software centered on modular community features and configurable user profiles. It supports activity streams, group spaces, member directories, and content posting with permission-driven visibility.

Pros
  • +Plugin-based extensibility for custom profiles, workflows, and permissions
  • +Granular visibility controls for activities, groups, and content
  • +Activity streams and member directories work together out of the box
  • +Core moderation features with role-based access controls
Cons
  • –Activity and notification behaviors can require careful tuning for scale
  • –Federation and cross-instance workflows are limited compared with ActivityPub-first stacks
  • –Private messaging modules and workflows often depend on enabled components
  • –Administration depth for automation and governance is thinner than enterprise suites
Use scenarios
  • organizations needing data control

    Deploy self-hosted social infrastructure

    Managed community hosting

  • developers creating social apps

    Build custom social behaviors with plugins

    Specialized social application

Show 2 more scenarios
  • member community managers

    Create private member networks

    Defined content boundaries

    Set up controlled spaces with profiles, group membership, permissions, and member updates.

  • community coordinators

    Run topic-based moderated group spaces

    Structured group participation

    Organize members into moderated group spaces for recurring discussions and shared resources.

Best for: Fits when community teams want a configurable, plugin-extensible social site with strong in-app permissions.

#10

Discourse

SMB

Open source forum and community platform with social features including user profiles, trust levels, and group messaging.

6.7/10
Overall
Features6.7/10
Ease of Use6.7/10
Value6.7/10
Standout feature

Native moderation review queues with staged approval flows for posts and users.

Discourse is a community discussion product that turns social networking into structured, searchable forums with strong moderation workflows. It supports group-based access controls, rich topic and post interactions, and notification digests that help drive repeat engagement.

Pros
  • +Granular moderation queues for staged review of user content
  • +Role-based access controls for staff, moderators, and group members
  • +Webhook and REST API access for automation tied to topics and users
  • +Highly customizable email notifications and notification digests
Cons
  • –UI customization and workflows require operational discipline for consistent governance
  • –Activity feed style experiences depend on configuration and theme work
  • –Federation is not a universal match for every ActivityPub use case
  • –Private messaging coverage can feel lighter than full social inbox expectations
Use scenarios
  • community and social platform operators

    Moderate social community participation

    Clear governance processes

  • customer support and success teams

    Consolidate support into public topics

    Repeated questions handled centrally

Show 2 more scenarios
  • technical community teams

    Automate community operations

    Routine actions synchronized

    Connect discussion events to notifications and workflows using APIs and webhooks for automation.

  • public community operators

    Host searchable public Q&A threads

    Q&A remains discoverable

    Enable members to ask questions and receive public answers in topic threads designed to stay searchable.

Best for: Fits when organizations want forum-native community networking with automation hooks and admin moderation control.

Conclusion

After evaluating 10 social network software, Mighty Networks stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.

Our Top Pick
Mighty Networks

Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.

Frequently Asked Questions About Social Network Software

How do Mastodon federation controls differ from Diaspora instance moderation controls?
Mastodon routes cross-server behavior through ActivityPub federation settings that administrators tune per instance policy. Diaspora centers moderation on instance configuration and server-side workflows that govern posts and identity within a decentralized network.
Which tools support SSO and what integration mechanism do they use?
eXo Platform integrates OAuth2 SSO to connect enterprise identity to tenant-managed users and roles. Discourse and HumHub focus on their platform login and admin provisioning controls rather than an OAuth2-first enterprise SSO pathway as the primary integration story.
How does data migration typically work when moving from a forum to social network software?
Discourse exports content and then maps topics and posts into a forum-native structure with moderation queues preserved. eXo Platform and SocialEngine both target internal community or branded community structures, so migration usually involves mapping users, content objects, and moderation states into a new data model and workflow.
What breaks if federation is required across instances in a product that is not ActivityPub-first?
Bettermode and Mighty Networks are built for managed hosted community operation, so federation behavior is not part of the core workflow. In those setups, cross-instance interaction depends on external integrations rather than first-class ActivityPub federation.
How do moderation queues and access controls vary between eXo Platform and Discourse?
eXo Platform uses group-scoped moderation queues tied to role-based permissions so administrators can restrict who reviews specific user-generated content. Discourse uses staged approval flows in moderation review queues and pairs them with rate limiting and audit-focused moderation settings.
When should a team choose HumHub over Oxwall for extensibility?
HumHub’s app framework lets administrators install and configure modules inside the same UI while preserving its permissions model. Oxwall also supports plugins and themes, but it relies more heavily on add-ons to fill missing social modules within a customizable theme and feature set.
Which platforms provide a documented API surface for automation and event-driven workflows?
SocialEngine offers an API surface plus extensibility points for modules that hook around member and content events. Diaspora exposes HTTP endpoints for automation around identity, posting, and server operations, while Discourse provides a large plugin and API surface for users, topics, and event automation.
How do private messaging and community activity visibility differ across SocialEngine and HumHub?
SocialEngine includes a private messaging module alongside member profiles and activity feeds, with moderation and permissions configured in the admin layer. HumHub also provides private messaging and member discovery via directories, and its activity streams remain governed by group permissions and modular apps.
What admin controls matter for governance when managing large cohorts with group moderation?
eXo Platform combines role-based access controls with audit-style traceability around content and actions, which supports governance at tenant scale. Mastodon instead applies governance through instance policy configuration and per-account blocking and reporting workflows that shape moderation across federation boundaries.

Tools reviewed

Primary sources checked during evaluation.

Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.

How to Choose the Right Social Network Software

We separate social network software options by how their data and publishing flows are controlled after you join: content visibility controls, how the system handles identity and relationships, and how change requests move through the workflow. In practice, everything comes down to the details of the label-based setup you can verify in a demo.

Visibility controls for posts and profiles

Why it matters

Visibility controls for posts and profiles decide who can actually see what you publish and what details you share. In a social network, small differences here change user behavior and content reach.

How to check

In the settings, look for audience options per post and per profile field, then verify on a second test account. Ask the admin view (if available) how visibility is enforced for comments, likes, and media.

Identity and connection management

Why it matters

Identity and connection management affects how members find each other, how requests are handled, and whether connections behave predictably. This is where “social” often breaks for admins.

How to check

Create two test users and check connection requests: can you approve, block, or limit who sees the relationship? Search for a member by profile fields and confirm what appears for each audience level.

Group moderation and enforcement

Why it matters

Group moderation and enforcement determines whether communities stay usable when volume rises. The label matters because moderation rules should match group norms without constant admin intervention.

How to check

Join (or request to join) a group and test posting rules: approvals, takedowns, and comment permissions. Ask for a sample policy workflow and then verify what moderators can change versus what requires admin access.

Automation and API for sync

Why it matters

Automation and API for sync controls how you keep members, content, and status aligned with other systems. If the API surface is shallow, updates become manual and inconsistent.

How to check

In the docs or demo, check whether you can programmatically create users, update profiles, and pull content visibility metadata. Ask how provisioning and content updates behave when they run repeatedly (idempotency in plain terms).

Audit log for moderation actions

Why it matters

An audit log for moderation actions matters when something goes wrong in public threads. It also helps moderators coordinate without guessing what changed and when.

How to check

Perform a visible moderation action in a test group and then locate the admin/audit record entry. Ask whether the log includes actor, target, timestamp, and reason text you can configure.

Content lifecycle and deletion handling

Why it matters

Content lifecycle and deletion handling affects legal hygiene and user trust, especially when items must be removed or edited after publication. Social features can leave echoes if lifecycle rules are incomplete.

How to check

Create a post with comments, then try edit, hide, and delete from both member and moderator roles. Verify what happens to associated reactions and whether removed items still appear in search and feeds.

Red flags

  • Visibility controls that only exist for the main post but not replies or reactions
  • Connection and request behavior that changes by role without clear rules
  • Moderation actions that leave no reviewable audit trail

Fit by situation

  • If you need tight posting controls across different audiences, prioritize Visibility controls for posts and profiles.
  • If moderators handle group volume often, prioritize Group moderation and enforcement.
  • If you plan to sync members and content with other systems, prioritize Automation and API for sync.
Commissioned Research

Funding and competing interests

This study was co-funded by several of the vendors assessed in it. No single vendor funded it. Funders could propose the market studied.

They had no role in selecting vendors, setting or weighting criteria, analysing data or drawing conclusions, and they received the same factual-accuracy check as every other vendor assessed.

Market definition, inclusion rules and criteria weights were fixed by an editor before research began and did not change afterwards. Editorial process →

Keep exploring

FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS

Not on this list? Let’s fix that.

Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.

Apply for a Listing

WHAT THIS INCLUDES

  • Where buyers compare

    Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.

  • Editorial write-up

    We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.

  • On-page brand presence

    You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.

  • Kept up to date

    We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.