GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Art DesignTop 10 Best Slide Scanning Software of 2026
Ranking top slide scanning software for technical teams, comparing workflows and tradeoffs across ReScan.ai, Hyland OnBase, and Kofax.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
AutoSplitter is the best fit when labs need standardized whole-slide splitting that works with existing scanner workflows, whereas Roche Digital Pathology is the better pick for regulated teams that require governed slide access tied to LIS context and dependable large-slide viewing.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
AutoSplitter
Automated batch splitting that produces consistent tile packages and correction-ready outputs from queued slide files.
Built for fits when labs need standardized whole-slide splitting from existing scanner workflows..
ScanSpeeder
Editor pickJob templates combine scan parameters and export behavior to standardize output for batch runs.
Built for fits when teams run repeatable internal slide scans and need consistent archive outputs..
Roche Digital Pathology
Editor pickRole-based slide access that enforces consistent permissions across managed slide lifecycles.
Built for fits when regulated labs need governed slide access tied to LIS context and reliable large-slide viewing..
Comparison Table
AutoSplitter
SMBScan post-processing software that automatically detects crops and straightens multiple slides or photos from batch scans.
Automated batch splitting that produces consistent tile packages and correction-ready outputs from queued slide files.
AutoSplitter is a whole-slide imaging processing workflow that targets batch ingestion and file-ready outputs rather than interactive microscopy control. Tile-based acquisition packaging reduces client load by turning large captures into smaller view segments. Metadata extraction supports traceability for acquisition settings and downstream indexing. Automation favors scheduled processing so operators can run overnight queues and review only exceptions.
A key tradeoff is that AutoSplitter relies on the upstream scanner output format and driver integration for the quality of the raw capture. Teams that lack consistent acquisition settings often see variance in focus coverage and color. AutoSplitter fits best when images already arrive from a defined scanner workflow and the goal is standardized splitting, correction, and delivery artifacts.
- +Batch queue processing for high-volume slide runs
- +Tile output packaging designed for fast downstream viewing
- +Metadata extraction supports traceable slide provenance
- +Correction steps help normalize capture artifacts across batches
- –Depends on scanner output consistency for final quality
- –Driver and input-format constraints can limit heterogenous fleets
- –ROI workflows require careful configuration for repeatability
- –Complex pipelines need dedicated operations time
Digital pathology operations
Overnight batch processing for queued accessions
Faster turnaround for review teams
Bioinformatics ingestion teams
Prepare indexed tile sets for analysis
Less manual preprocessing
Show 1 more scenario
Research labs with varied scanners
Normalize outputs across a fleet
More consistent viewer behavior
Apply correction and consistent splitting rules to reduce format variance across sources.
Best for: Fits when labs need standardized whole-slide splitting from existing scanner workflows.
ScanSpeeder
SMBBatch scanning software that auto-detects and crops individual slides and photos from flatbed scans.
Job templates combine scan parameters and export behavior to standardize output for batch runs.
ScanSpeeder fits technical teams that need repeatable slide scanning runs across many slides and consistent output for internal viewing systems. The workflow supports batch jobs, barcode-driven naming, and metadata extraction so scanned sets stay organized during large volume runs. Configuration centers on scan parameters that drive output quality and file structure, rather than only on post-processing.
A key tradeoff is that governance and extensibility depend more on workstation-level configuration than on enterprise-level administration features. ScanSpeeder works best when one team owns the scanning stations and controls the job templates used by operators. It is a strong fit for internal R&D archives that must regenerate scans with the same settings and file organization.
- +Batch ingestion with barcode parsing keeps slide sets consistently named
- +Conversion pipeline produces viewer-ready pyramidal outputs for large archives
- +Metadata extraction links scan settings to exported images
- +Job templates reduce operator variability across long scan runs
- –Enterprise RBAC and audit logging are limited compared with document platforms
- –Scanner driver compatibility can narrow supported hardware setups
Pathology lab ops teams
Batch scan of accessioned slide batches
Fewer manual renaming errors
Biomedical R&D imaging teams
Regenerate archives with fixed settings
More reproducible image sets
Show 1 more scenario
Laboratory IT groups
Central viewing for large image libraries
Faster navigation across archives
Pyramidal output supports efficient deep zoom style browsing for big slide collections.
Best for: Fits when teams run repeatable internal slide scans and need consistent archive outputs.
Roche Digital Pathology
enterpriseDigital pathology software supporting slide scanning, image review, and laboratory workflows.
Role-based slide access that enforces consistent permissions across managed slide lifecycles.
Roche Digital Pathology is a fit for labs that need guided slide handling tied to existing information systems and that prioritize consistent governance around slide access and lifecycle. It supports large-slide viewing patterns that align with pyramidal outputs used in routine whole-slide imaging workflows. Batch ingestion and metadata extraction matter most when titles, identifiers, and study context must be preserved for later search and review.
A key tradeoff is that the solution’s integration and automation surface is more oriented around workflow configuration than broad developer-driven extensibility. Teams typically adopt it when scanner output, slide identifiers, and review roles must stay consistent across departments, not when building custom per-tile processing pipelines.
- +Slide workflow governance supports consistent review across sites
- +Slide metadata handling keeps study context attached to images
- +Enterprise integration focus reduces manual handoffs between systems
- +Optimized viewing experience for large pyramidal slides
- –Limited open-ended image processing customization compared with DIY stacks
- –Deep integration work can require structured onboarding and testing discipline
Pathology department leads
Multi-user case review with permissions
Reduced unauthorized access risk
Digital pathology operations
Batch slide onboarding from scanners
Faster case readiness
Show 2 more scenarios
IT integration teams
Enterprise systems coordination
Fewer manual transfers
Integrates slide handling with existing enterprise services for user identity and workflow routing.
Research quality reviewers
Controlled study slide lifecycle
Audit-ready workflow consistency
Maintains structured organization and access rules throughout study progression.
Best for: Fits when regulated labs need governed slide access tied to LIS context and reliable large-slide viewing.
VueScan
SMBUniversal scanner software supporting over 6000 scanner models including film and slide scanners.
Broad scanner model compatibility through its device-specific driver layer and detailed acquisition controls.
VueScan is a slide scanning driver package from hamrick.com that focuses on scanner compatibility and repeatable image processing rather than a workflow layer. It supports whole-slide style capture by tuning acquisition settings and performing color and exposure corrections during scanning.
VueScan can generate high-resolution outputs with consistent metadata handling for downstream analysis and archiving. Setup still centers on selecting the correct device profile and calibration choices for each scanner model.
- +Strong scanner-driver coverage across many camera and scanner models
- +Configurable image corrections for predictable color and exposure per scan
- +Batch capture settings support repeatable runs for large slide sets
- +Direct control of acquisition parameters for tuning sharpness and artifacts
- –Limited automation workflow features beyond driver-level capture and processing
- –No native IIIF endpoint publishing or tile pyramid generation
- –ROI-based stiching workflows are not a guided, standardized process
- –Calibration and device profile selection require careful per-scanner setup
Best for: Fits when teams need reliable scanner compatibility and controlled capture outputs without a full WSI publishing workflow.
SilverFast
enterpriseProfessional scanning software for film slides and negatives with advanced color correction and dust removal.
Integrated optical correction pipeline, including chromatic aberration correction, applied during capture rather than only after export.
SilverFast performs whole-slide imaging workflows with guided capture, batch scanning, and output generation for downstream viewing and analysis. It includes calibration-oriented corrections such as flat-field correction and chromatic aberration correction to improve consistency across sessions.
The software supports creation of large, multi-resolution image pyramids for efficient navigation, and it can extract scanner and capture metadata alongside exported images. Its fit is strongest when labs need repeatable optics tuning per scanner and objective setting, not just basic capture.
- +Optics-focused corrections for color and alignment during acquisition
- +Pyramid-based exports support fast viewing of large slides
- +Batch ingestion workflow supports higher throughput than single-slide runs
- +Scanner driver support enables integration with multiple supported models
- –Configuration work is required to keep results consistent across scanners
- –Automation depth is narrower than enterprise capture and governance stacks
- –ROI-centric workflows rely more on operator steps than rules engines
- –Driver and calibration compatibility can limit portability across labs
Best for: Fits when microscopy labs need repeatable calibration-driven capture and pyramid outputs for viewing.
QuPath
enterpriseOpen-source bioimage analysis software for whole slide imaging in digital pathology.
QuPath’s Groovy and Java scripting lets teams turn segmentation and measurement steps into reusable, versionable pipelines.
QuPath is an open-source whole-slide imaging analysis and annotation tool that runs on the same slide images used for downstream digital pathology workflows. It is built around a Java-based project model that supports tile-based viewing, region of interest work, and scriptable image processing steps.
QuPath’s core strength is algorithm-driven segmentation and measurement with reproducible pipelines rather than scanner-specific capture control. For slide scanning, it functions best when images are already available as common pyramid formats for analysis and review.
- +Scriptable analysis workflows for repeatable slide processing
- +Strong ROI annotation tools with measurement export
- +Flexible handling of common whole-slide image pyramid formats
- +Built-in visualization that supports rapid QA on regions
- –No native slide acquisition or scanner driver control
- –Automation requires Java or scripting knowledge for advanced pipelines
- –Large-slide performance depends on system RAM and storage speed
- –Team governance features like RBAC are not built for enterprise use
Best for: Fits when technical pathology teams need script-driven ROI analysis on already scanned slides.
3DHISTECH CaseViewer
enterpriseWhole slide imaging software suite for digital pathology slide scanning viewing and analysis.
Case-level review workspace that binds slide navigation and ROI annotations to a case context.
3DHISTECH CaseViewer pairs whole-slide image viewing with case-centric workflows for teaching, review, and pathology handoff. The tool is designed around slide metadata awareness and region-of-interest workflows that reduce manual context switching during review.
CaseViewer supports batch ingestion to get large slide collections indexed for navigation and retrieval. Image output supports standard pyramid-based formats suitable for fast pan and zoom in large datasets.
- +Case-first navigation keeps review context attached to slide metadata
- +Annotation and ROI workflow supports structured review within cases
- +Pyramid-based rendering supports high-speed pan and zoom on large slides
- +Batch ingestion helps large libraries become browsable without per-slide setup
- –Automation and API surface are not as deep as scanner-integrated enterprise stacks
- –Extensibility for custom pipelines depends on external system integration
Best for: Fits when pathology teams need fast, case-centric WSI review for curated libraries.
FilmLab
SMBFilm scanning application for converting photographic negatives and slides into digital images.
Batch ingestion plus metadata extraction ties operational context to generated WSI pyramids for downstream viewing.
FilmLab targets slide digitization with an emphasis on end-to-end capture, inspection, and publishing of whole-slide imaging outputs. It supports tile-based viewing via standard image pyramids and can generate web-friendly viewers for visual navigation.
FilmLab’s workflow centers on batch ingestion and metadata extraction so operators can process many slides without redoing manual steps. Output handling focuses on conversion to common WSI container formats used for downstream viewing and archival.
- +Batch ingestion reduces repetitive slide processing work
- +Tile-based output supports fast web viewing patterns
- +Metadata extraction helps keep acquisition context attached
- +Conversion targets common WSI viewing and archival workflows
- –Limited evidence of enterprise-grade RBAC and audit logging controls
- –Driver compatibility and scanner integrations can constrain deployments
- –Stitch quality diagnostics for artifact patterns are not clearly documented
- –Automation depth for unattended runs depends on setup discipline
Best for: Fits when mid-size teams digitize slides in batches and need web viewing outputs.
Epson Scan 2
SMBScanner software for capturing film, photographic slides, documents, and other flatbed media.
Scanner-tethered capture profiles in Epson Scan 2 repeat exposure and color settings across batch slide scans.
Epson Scan 2 drives Epson flatbed scanners for slide digitization using its scanner-tethered capture flow and per-device calibration controls. The software supports desktop batch scanning with batch profiles that apply consistent exposure and color settings across runs.
Output options include high-bit-depth TIFF generation and multi-page PDF export for document-style handoff. Slide throughput and image quality depend heavily on the scanner model, its driver version, and the quality of the slide holder alignment.
- +Batch scanning profiles apply repeatable capture settings across slide sets
- +High-bit-depth TIFF output supports downstream color and analysis workflows
- +Color management settings help keep exposures consistent between batches
- +Works with Epson scanner drivers through Epson Scan 2 capture control
- –No native whole-slide imaging pipeline or pyramid generation workflow
- –Limited automation for metadata extraction and structured slide indexing
- –Barcode parsing for slide labels and tray workflows is not supported natively
- –Requires close slide holder alignment to avoid stitching artifacts
Best for: Fits when teams digitize small slide batches into TIFF or PDF using Epson hardware and manual QC.
Cytomine
API-firstWeb-based platform for viewing, annotating, sharing, and analyzing large microscopy images.
ROI-driven annotation workflow paired with REST automation for programmatic annotation export and curation at scale.
Cytomine is a web-based whole-slide imaging management and annotation system that targets pathology and research workflows rather than scanner control. It supports tile-based viewing with deep zoom navigation, plus region-of-interest annotation and metadata-driven organization for large slide sets.
Cytomine emphasizes OME-TIFF style pyramids for efficient browser delivery and supports DICOM WSI import paths used in clinical imaging handoffs. It also provides an automation surface through REST endpoints for ingestion, slide management, and annotation export.
- +Deep-zoom slide viewing supports fast interactive review of large cohorts
- +REST endpoints enable automated slide ingestion and annotation export
- +ROI annotation workflow fits repeated review and dataset curation
- +Supports clinical image handoffs through DICOM WSI oriented import paths
- –Does not replace scanner-side acquisition and focus correction controls
- –Workflow automation requires integration work around server-side ingestion
- –Large-batch setup can be admin-heavy when governance and roles are strict
- –Browser-based performance depends on pyramid generation quality
Best for: Fits when research teams need automated slide ingestion and web annotation across large cohorts.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 art design, AutoSplitter stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right slide scanning software
This buyer's guide covers slide scanning software options across AutoSplitter, ScanSpeeder, Roche Digital Pathology, VueScan, and SilverFast, plus QuPath, 3DHISTECH CaseViewer, FilmLab, Epson Scan 2, and Cytomine. Each tool review card focuses on how workflows handle batch ingestion, capture controls, and whole-slide imaging outputs.
The comparisons target operational fit for labs that need standardized tile packages, governed slide access, or script-driven ROI work. The guide also calls out where automation and integration depth diverge between scanner-driver capture tools and enterprise slide publishing and governance stacks.
Slide scanning software for whole-slide imaging, batch capture, and governed WSI publishing
Slide scanning software converts microscope slides into whole-slide imaging outputs by combining acquisition controls, correction behavior, and export formats for large slide viewing. Tools in this guide vary by whether they center on standardized batch splitting and tile output packaging, or on end-to-end governed review and viewing.
AutoSplitter is positioned for automated batch splitting that queues slide files and produces consistent tile packages and correction-ready outputs. ScanSpeeder emphasizes job templates for repeatable scan parameters paired with batch ingestion that parses slide barcodes and generates viewer-ready pyramidal outputs for large archives.
Slide scanning criteria that reflect real WSI workflows
The scanner-to-WSI pipeline has two failure points that show up in day-to-day operations. Capture consistency affects downstream correction behavior, while export structure affects how fast teams can open slides at scale.
This guide evaluates how each tool handles batch ingestion, correction-ready tile packaging, and the handoff into governed review or automated analysis. It also checks whether automation and integration surfaces match the way labs run jobs across scanners, sites, and cases.
Batch ingestion with naming control and queue behavior
AutoSplitter processes queued slide files into consistent tile packages for standardized whole-slide splitting workflows. ScanSpeeder adds barcode parsing and job templates so batch runs produce consistent archive outputs.
Output format structure for large-slide viewing
ScanSpeeder produces viewer-ready pyramidal outputs that fit large archives. SilverFast and Epson Scan 2 also generate pyramid-based viewing support through their capture and export paths, with Epson Scan 2 focusing on high-bit-depth TIFF output for downstream workflows.
Governed access and slide lifecycle controls
Roche Digital Pathology enforces role-based slide access so permissions remain consistent across managed slide lifecycles. ScanSpeeder can standardize batch ingestion and exports, but its enterprise RBAC and audit logging coverage is limited versus document-style governance stacks.
Automation and API surface for programmatic ingestion and annotation
Cytomine pairs deep-zoom slide viewing with REST endpoints for programmatic slide ingestion and annotation export. FilmLab adds batch ingestion and metadata extraction into generated WSI pyramids, while its governance controls are not positioned at the same depth as enterprise stacks.
Capture-time optics and correction consistency
SilverFast applies an integrated optical correction pipeline during capture, including chromatic aberration correction. VueScan instead concentrates on device-specific driver-layer capture controls and configurable image corrections per scan.
Scriptable ROI analysis and reusable processing pipelines
QuPath turns segmentation and measurement steps into reusable Groovy and Java scripting pipelines for repeatable slide processing. QuPath also supports ROI annotation and measurement export, which fits technical teams that already manage acquisition elsewhere.
Case-centric review workflows that bind context to annotations
3DHISTECH CaseViewer organizes navigation and ROI annotations around a case-first workspace. Roche Digital Pathology also maintains slide metadata tied to study context, but it prioritizes governed slide access over open-ended image processing customization.
How to choose slide scanning software by workflow control points
The right slide scanning software choice depends on where control must live. Some teams need capture-time repeatability and scanner compatibility, while others need governed access, automated ingestion, and programmatic annotation workflows.
The steps below fork on those control points and on how output structure must match downstream viewing or analysis tools. Each branch maps to concrete capabilities like batch queue behavior, correction handling, RBAC coverage, and REST automation.
Decide whether the core problem is standardized splitting or scanner capture control
If the main bottleneck is taking existing queued slide files and converting them into consistent tile packages, AutoSplitter fits because it produces correction-ready outputs from queued inputs. If the priority is consistent scanner capture parameters and device coverage, VueScan and Epson Scan 2 focus on capture control profiles tied to scanner workflows.
Choose pyramid output readiness based on archive scale and downstream viewers
If batch runs must end with viewer-ready pyramidal outputs for large archives, ScanSpeeder is built around job templates and a conversion pipeline that generates pyramidal outputs. If the workflow centers on capture-time calibration and pyramid-based export, SilverFast targets optical correction during acquisition.
Select governance depth based on who can access slide content
For regulated review where permissions must be enforced across slide lifecycles, Roche Digital Pathology provides role-based slide access tied to managed workflows. If governance is less central than standardized exports, ScanSpeeder can still standardize batch ingestion and naming but it limits enterprise RBAC and audit logging coverage.
Pick automation by integration direction: REST-driven ingestion versus scanner-side tooling
If automation must be programmatic with REST endpoints for slide ingestion and annotation export, Cytomine is designed for REST-driven workflows paired with deep-zoom viewing. If automation must start from capture jobs and queue processing with consistent packaging, AutoSplitter and FilmLab focus on operational batch ingestion and tile-based outputs.
Match analysis needs to scripting or to managed case review
If repeatable ROI segmentation and measurement pipelines are required, QuPath provides Groovy and Java scripting plus measurement export. If teams need case-first review where navigation and ROI annotations stay bound to a case context, 3DHISTECH CaseViewer is built around that workspace model.
Who should buy slide scanning software for their actual workflow
Slide scanning software choices separate along operational roles in the pipeline. Some tools reduce manual work in batch ingestion and standardized splitting, while others reduce risk by enforcing governed slide access or by enabling REST-driven automation.
The best fit depends on whether teams run capture-centric jobs, manage governed slide review across sites, or need script-driven ROI analysis or REST-based programmatic annotation exports.
Digitization teams standardizing large batch runs into consistent archives
AutoSplitter reduces variability by turning queued slide files into consistent tile packages for downstream viewing. ScanSpeeder adds barcode parsing and job templates so slide sets get consistently named and exported.
Regulated labs that need governed slide access tied to managed lifecycles
Roche Digital Pathology enforces role-based slide access so permissions remain consistent across slide workflows. It also keeps slide metadata attached to study context for reliable review across sites.
Research teams that need automated slide ingestion and programmatic annotation export
Cytomine supports REST endpoints for automated slide ingestion and annotation export alongside deep-zoom viewing. FilmLab supports batch ingestion and metadata extraction, but it does not position enterprise RBAC and audit logging controls at the same level.
Pathology analysts who need script-driven ROI work on already scanned slides
QuPath focuses on scriptable analysis pipelines using Groovy and Java so teams can turn segmentation and measurement into reusable workflows. It also supports ROI annotation tools with measurement export.
Case review teams that work in structured case contexts with ROI annotations
3DHISTECH CaseViewer binds slide navigation and ROI annotations to a case context for fast case-centric review. It prioritizes review workspace behavior and structured annotation workflows more than scanner driver control.
Common slide scanning software mistakes that cause operational failures
Many purchasing mistakes come from mapping capture, viewing, and automation requirements to the wrong product layer. The category includes scanner-tethered capture tools, tile package generation tools, and governed review platforms, and those layers are not interchangeable.
The pitfalls below target where teams usually lose time, quality consistency, or governance control.
Assuming scanner-driver tools provide an end-to-end whole-slide imaging publishing workflow
VueScan and Epson Scan 2 provide strong acquisition controls and export behavior, but they do not provide native IIIF endpoint publishing or a pyramid-generation workflow in the way archive-first tools do. Match capture-control tools to workflows that already handle publishing and tile pyramids elsewhere.
Choosing a pyramid viewer output but ignoring how permissions and auditability will work
ScanSpeeder can standardize batch ingestion and exports, but its enterprise RBAC and audit logging coverage is limited compared with document-style governance stacks. Roche Digital Pathology is built around governed slide access and slide workflow governance for consistent review.
Buying a review workspace while expecting deep automation for ingestion and custom processing
3DHISTECH CaseViewer supports case-level navigation and ROI annotations, but its automation and API surface are not positioned as deep as scanner-integrated enterprise stacks. QuPath can automate analysis with scripting, but it does not provide native slide acquisition or scanner driver control.
Relying on heterogeneous scanner fleets without accounting for driver and input-format constraints
AutoSplitter depends on scanner output consistency, and driver and input-format constraints can limit heterogenous fleets. VueScan’s device-specific driver-layer coverage can reduce compatibility risk when hardware variety is the main constraint.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated AutoSplitter, ScanSpeeder, Roche Digital Pathology, VueScan, SilverFast, QuPath, 3DHISTECH CaseViewer, FilmLab, Epson Scan 2, and Cytomine against workflow control points that matter for slide scanning software. Features accounted for 40% of scoring, and ease and value each accounted for 30% by mapping capabilities like batch queue behavior, export structure, and governance coverage to day-to-day operations.
AutoSplitter separated itself by producing consistent tile packages from queued slide files and by packaging outputs for fast downstream viewing. The ranking also reflected where automation and integration depth diverge between scanner-driver capture tools and governed slide publishing workflows.
Frequently Asked Questions About slide scanning software
How does automated batch ingestion differ between AutoSplitter, ScanSpeeder, and FilmLab?
Which tool is best when the workflow starts from existing scanner output files instead of live capture?
When is scanner-driver compatibility the limiting factor, and which options handle it directly?
What breaks if a team needs standardized pyramid outputs across operators for indexing and retrieval?
How does ROI work differ between Cytomine, Roche Digital Pathology, and 3DHISTECH CaseViewer?
Which integration surface fits identity and access controls better between Roche Digital Pathology and Cytomine?
How is extensibility handled for scripted analysis versus capture workflows in QuPath and AutoSplitter?
What output format expectations cause friction when switching between ScanSpeeder, Cytomine, and SilverFast?
How does metadata extraction support automation and audit trails across FilmLab and AutoSplitter?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Art Design alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of art design tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare art design tools→