Top 8 Best Shoring Design Software of 2026

SkyCiv’s shoring workflow centers on defining excavation geometry, soil parameters, and support components, then generating result tables and calculation reports for each design iteration. The calculation outputs focus on limit checks used in excavation support design workflows, including capacity checks tied to selected wall and support configurations. Teams that need fast turnaround use its structured input forms to run multiple scenarios and keep documentation aligned to each assumption set.

A key tradeoff is that SkyCiv’s shoring coverage depends on using its built-in design configurations rather than fully general finite element modeling. SkyCiv fits situations where an excavation support package needs consistent limit checks and formatted deliverables, such as preliminary design through design development for bridge work planning.

RS2 is suited to shoring design teams that need calculations tied to the geotechnical report inputs, such as soil layering, groundwater table location, and interface properties. It supports limit equilibrium style stability outputs and finite element analysis for stress and deformation assessment in braced cut style models. RS2 also helps keep the workflow calculation-centered by storing assumptions in the analysis project so revisions propagate through re-runs.

A key tradeoff is that RS2 is not a model authoring tool for parametric detailing, so it fits best when geometry is prepared in a compatible format or built inside the analysis model. RS2 fits a workflow where a competent person needs repeatable stability checks as excavation stages change, with documented inputs for review cycles.

ProSheet supports structured input for excavation geometry, soil profile parameters, and loading conditions, then generates design artifacts tied to shoring configurations. The workflow is oriented around system selection and iteration, so teams can revise embedment depth and reinforcement choices without rebuilding every deliverable. Output sets are designed to be reused across similar projects, which reduces drafting drift when multiple design packages share assumptions.

A key tradeoff is limited flexibility for custom engineering methods beyond ProSheet’s built-in check set, so teams needing advanced limit equilibrium or custom finite element analysis workflows may need an external tool. ProSheet fits best when a design team must produce consistent shoring deliverables for common project types and needs repeatable diagram and component selection output for internal review cycles.

Civiltech Shoring Suite targets shoring design workflows with a CAD-centric toolchain for models that combine excavation geometry, support elements, and load checks. It supports generation of wall and support layouts using rule-based design objects that can be edited and re-evaluated as project parameters change.

The suite focuses on producing deliverables tied to engineering work products, including drawings and calculation-style outputs aligned with common retaining and braced excavation scenarios. Civiltech Shoring Suite is best assessed against tools that also integrate design logic with output production rather than only offering geometry modeling.

spMats converts shoring design calculations into a structured workflow for retaining and braced excavation layouts, including soldier pile, struts, and tieback style outputs. The core capability is generating repeatable shoring design results that can be checked, iterated, and documented for project packages.

Structurepoint.org also supports configuration of common calculation inputs so teams can standardize geotechnical assumptions and load cases across designs. The overall focus is on calculation-driven drawings and reports rather than general-purpose CAD modeling.

GGU-RETAIN is a shoring design workflow tool that focuses on retaining wall and excavation support calculations tied to geotechnical input and construction stages. It supports common shoring elements such as soldier pile, tiebacks, rakers, and wales, and it organizes results around limit equilibrium style outputs and section checks.

The software is geared toward repeatable project calculation runs where design parameters, load cases, and excavation stages are configured and rerun for updates. Its strongest fit is project teams that need consistent shoring computations and traceable input sets rather than interactive BIM authoring.

FLAC3D from Itasca is distinct because it targets nonlinear 3D finite element analysis for excavation support and soil-structure interaction with a mature continuum mechanics engine. The workflow supports modeling staged construction effects, including ground loading changes and support installation sequences, then extracting stresses, displacements, and zone responses for design checks.

It also integrates with Itasca’s broader geotechnical analysis ecosystem, which helps teams reuse material models and simulation conventions across projects. For shoring design work, the most practical strength is translating geotechnical report inputs into a simulation that can represent complex 3D behavior beyond limit equilibrium approximations.

midas GTS NX is a geotechnical finite element analysis and modeling tool used for excavation support and temporary works design checks. It builds soil-structure interaction models that capture staged excavation, support installation, and groundwater effects that drive apparent earth pressure changes.

The workflow integrates model inputs from geotechnical reports and lets teams reuse material and boundary-condition definitions across revisions. Its strength for shoring design teams is the combination of advanced constitutive modeling, staged construction sequence control, and result outputs tied to limit states for design review.