GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Education LearningTop 10 Best Security Training Software of 2026
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
KnowBe4
Phishing simulations with automated training assignment based on user click behavior
Built for mid-market and enterprise teams standardizing phishing resilience through measurable training.
Kitsune (Security Awareness Training)
Role-based learning paths that adapt training assignments to learner responsibilities
Built for teams needing recurring security awareness training with role-based learning paths and reporting.
Hoxhunt
Hoxhunt mobile phishing simulations with adaptive training that triggers next steps based on user clicks
Built for organizations running phishing awareness programs with mobile-style simulations and clear reporting.
Comparison Table
This comparison table evaluates security training and attack simulation platforms used to reduce phishing and social engineering risk. You will compare vendors such as KnowBe4, Proofpoint Security Awareness, Cofense, Microsoft Defender Security Training, and Hoxhunt across core capabilities like simulation coverage, reporting depth, integration options, and admin controls. Use the results to match platform features to your training goals, user base, and security stack.
| # | Tool | Category | Overall | Features | Ease of Use | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KnowBe4 KnowBe4 delivers phishing simulation, security awareness training, and automated training workflows for reducing human risk. | enterprise | 9.3/10 | 9.2/10 | 8.6/10 | 8.8/10 |
| 2 | Proofpoint Security Awareness Proofpoint Security Awareness provides phishing simulations, training content, and reporting to improve organization-wide security behavior. | enterprise | 8.3/10 | 8.7/10 | 7.9/10 | 7.6/10 |
| 3 | Cofense Cofense offers phishing security training tied to real-world detection and reporting to drive measurable user improvement. | phishing-focused | 8.0/10 | 8.8/10 | 7.2/10 | 7.4/10 |
| 4 | Microsoft Defender Security Training (Attack Simulation Training) Microsoft Defender Attack Simulation Training delivers phishing simulation and user training integrated with Microsoft 365 security reporting. | M365-integrated | 8.1/10 | 8.7/10 | 7.6/10 | 7.9/10 |
| 5 | Hoxhunt Hoxhunt provides continuous phishing simulations and security training with analytics that track click and response behavior. | behavioral | 8.2/10 | 8.5/10 | 8.8/10 | 7.4/10 |
| 6 | Jumio Security Awareness Jumio Security Awareness delivers training and engagement programs to support secure user practices across the organization. | training-platform | 7.2/10 | 7.6/10 | 6.9/10 | 7.1/10 |
| 7 | GoPhish GoPhish is an open-source phishing simulation platform that lets teams run campaigns and measure user interactions. | open-source | 7.4/10 | 8.0/10 | 7.2/10 | 7.8/10 |
| 8 | Kitsune (Security Awareness Training) Kitsune delivers security awareness content and phishing simulation exercises with progress tracking for training management. | SMB-friendly | 7.9/10 | 7.7/10 | 8.2/10 | 8.1/10 |
| 9 | Wizer Wizer trains users and teams with interactive learning paths that include security-focused exercises and assessments. | interactive-learning | 8.2/10 | 8.7/10 | 7.8/10 | 8.0/10 |
| 10 | Cybrary Cybrary provides security training courses, learning paths, and assessments for workforce upskilling and compliance learning. | course-based | 7.1/10 | 7.4/10 | 7.0/10 | 7.2/10 |
KnowBe4 delivers phishing simulation, security awareness training, and automated training workflows for reducing human risk.
Proofpoint Security Awareness provides phishing simulations, training content, and reporting to improve organization-wide security behavior.
Cofense offers phishing security training tied to real-world detection and reporting to drive measurable user improvement.
Microsoft Defender Attack Simulation Training delivers phishing simulation and user training integrated with Microsoft 365 security reporting.
Hoxhunt provides continuous phishing simulations and security training with analytics that track click and response behavior.
Jumio Security Awareness delivers training and engagement programs to support secure user practices across the organization.
GoPhish is an open-source phishing simulation platform that lets teams run campaigns and measure user interactions.
Kitsune delivers security awareness content and phishing simulation exercises with progress tracking for training management.
Wizer trains users and teams with interactive learning paths that include security-focused exercises and assessments.
Cybrary provides security training courses, learning paths, and assessments for workforce upskilling and compliance learning.
KnowBe4
enterpriseKnowBe4 delivers phishing simulation, security awareness training, and automated training workflows for reducing human risk.
Phishing simulations with automated training assignment based on user click behavior
KnowBe4 stands out for combining phishing simulation with an organization-wide security awareness program built around measurable behavior change. It provides automated phishing campaigns, training content delivery, and reporting dashboards that track click and completion rates across users and departments. The platform also supports integration with identity providers and security tools to streamline onboarding and align training with real user risk signals. Administrators get control over templates, targeting rules, and ongoing campaign schedules without building custom training workflows.
Pros
- Strong phishing simulation with repeatable, department-level campaign scheduling
- Security awareness training library tied to simulation outcomes for immediate remediation
- Detailed reporting dashboards track clicks and training completion by user group
- Flexible template controls for crafting realistic phishing scenarios
- Integrations with common identity and security ecosystems for faster rollout
Cons
- Campaign setup and targeting rules take time to tune for larger orgs
- Advanced reporting customization requires more admin effort than basic views
- Training content breadth can feel generic without deeper internal customization
Best For
Mid-market and enterprise teams standardizing phishing resilience through measurable training
Proofpoint Security Awareness
enterpriseProofpoint Security Awareness provides phishing simulations, training content, and reporting to improve organization-wide security behavior.
Phishing simulations with automated, targeted training assignments based on user actions
Proofpoint Security Awareness stands out with its security program content and measurement designed to improve human risk reduction across email and wider user behavior. It includes phishing simulations, interactive training modules, and customizable learning paths that reinforce targeted threats. Reporting and analytics track user engagement, click and completion rates, and program effectiveness over time. Admin workflows support role-based assignments and scoping for different audiences and geographies.
Pros
- Phishing simulations tied to interactive training reinforcement
- Detailed reporting for clicks, enrollments, and completion trends
- Role-based assignments support multiple teams and user segments
Cons
- Setup can feel heavy for small teams without admins
- More advanced customization increases configuration time
- Value drops when you need only baseline awareness content
Best For
Organizations running ongoing phishing simulation programs with measurable training outcomes
Cofense
phishing-focusedCofense offers phishing security training tied to real-world detection and reporting to drive measurable user improvement.
User reporting-driven security training that uses click and report telemetry to drive remediation
Cofense focuses on security awareness training tied directly to phishing click and reporting behavior. It delivers simulated phishing campaigns and reaction training with reporting workflows that route real user actions into security operations. Training content is designed around repeatable exercises like credential theft and malicious attachment scenarios. Its reporting telemetry supports targeted follow-ups instead of only delivering generic education modules.
Pros
- Phishing simulations and user reporting create measurable training from real click behavior
- Action-driven workflows turn reported emails into repeatable remediation steps
- Focused exercises target common delivery vectors like credentials and attachment-based threats
- Telemetry supports campaign tuning and user follow-up rather than static education
Cons
- Configuration and integration take setup effort across email, reporting, and training flows
- Admin UX can feel dense compared with simpler awareness platforms
- Advanced tuning depends on correct baselines and user-group design
Best For
Organizations running ongoing phishing simulation and reporting programs with measurable click-to-report improvement
Microsoft Defender Security Training (Attack Simulation Training)
M365-integratedMicrosoft Defender Attack Simulation Training delivers phishing simulation and user training integrated with Microsoft 365 security reporting.
Automated attack simulation training that ties Defender telemetry to user risk and training follow-up
Microsoft Defender Security Training delivers attack simulation campaigns tied to Defender for Endpoint signals, so training responds to real security exposure. It lets admins create and manage phishing, credential theft, and other simulated attacks, then track click and report behavior across users. It also supports automated training workflows and reporting that connect simulation outcomes to user risk reduction efforts. The strongest fit is Microsoft security customers who want simulated training integrated with their Microsoft security stack.
Pros
- Attack simulation campaigns for phishing and credential theft with measurable user outcomes
- Integration with Defender security tooling for actionability based on endpoint telemetry
- Centralized reporting that links simulation results to training progress
Cons
- Setup requires Microsoft identity and security configuration knowledge
- Simulation authoring flexibility can feel limited versus specialized phishing platforms
- Advanced reporting depends on consistent data alignment across Microsoft services
Best For
Microsoft security customers running Defender for Endpoint training with analytics
Hoxhunt
behavioralHoxhunt provides continuous phishing simulations and security training with analytics that track click and response behavior.
Hoxhunt mobile phishing simulations with adaptive training that triggers next steps based on user clicks
Hoxhunt stands out with mobile-first phishing simulations and interactive training built around realistic employee behavior. It delivers targeted campaigns, automated scoring, and follow-up learning that adapts based on users’ actions. The platform focuses on end-user training workflows rather than complex security operations tooling, with clear reporting for awareness programs. Administrator controls cover template-based content creation and role-based assignment for safer rollout across teams.
Pros
- Mobile-first phishing simulations improve realism for everyday employee behavior
- Action-based training paths reinforce lessons based on what users did in simulations
- Admin reporting makes it easy to track click rates and training completion
- Campaign management supports scheduling and assignment for multiple user groups
Cons
- Advanced customization is limited compared with simulation platforms that offer heavy scripting
- Fewer integration options can increase setup effort for larger identity ecosystems
- Training content flexibility can be constrained for highly specialized industries
Best For
Organizations running phishing awareness programs with mobile-style simulations and clear reporting
Jumio Security Awareness
training-platformJumio Security Awareness delivers training and engagement programs to support secure user practices across the organization.
Role-based security training campaigns with admin analytics and progress reporting
Jumio Security Awareness focuses on measurable human-risk reduction using security training content paired with tracking and reporting. It delivers interactive learning campaigns and assessments designed to reinforce behaviors across email, web, and endpoint security topics. Admins get role-based assignment and progress visibility plus analytics that support compliance-oriented reporting. The platform also integrates with identity and directory workflows so onboarding and user management can align with existing access processes.
Pros
- Campaign-based training with progress and completion analytics
- Interactive assessments to test retention and reinforce key controls
- Role-based assignment supports structured organization-wide rollouts
- Reporting supports security and compliance review workflows
- Integrates with enterprise identity workflows for user onboarding
Cons
- Setup and content customization require more admin effort
- Learning library depth may feel limited versus broader training suites
- Advanced reporting customization can be constrained by templates
- Global rollout can be harder without clear localization guidance
Best For
Organizations needing measurable security training analytics with structured campaigns
GoPhish
open-sourceGoPhish is an open-source phishing simulation platform that lets teams run campaigns and measure user interactions.
GoPhish landing pages for credential-harvesting phishing simulations with per-user click and report tracking
GoPhish focuses on phishing and security awareness training workflows using configurable email templates and staged campaigns. It lets teams track opens, clicks, and report outcomes per user with simple dashboards and campaign views. The tool supports landing pages for credential-harvesting simulations and reusable templates for recurring training. It also provides automated follow-ups like additional emails based on user actions.
Pros
- Campaign builder supports templates, tracking, and repeatable training scenarios
- Clear metrics track opens and clicks at user and campaign levels
- Landing pages enable realistic phishing simulations beyond link-only tests
Cons
- Limited advanced reporting compared with enterprise security training platforms
- More manual setup is required for complex automation and customization
- Credential-capture simulations can increase operational risk if governance is weak
Best For
Teams running phishing simulations and awareness training without heavy enterprise tooling
Kitsune (Security Awareness Training)
SMB-friendlyKitsune delivers security awareness content and phishing simulation exercises with progress tracking for training management.
Role-based learning paths that adapt training assignments to learner responsibilities
Kitsune focuses on security awareness training that combines short content with measurable engagement. It supports role-based learning paths and automated reminders tied to learner progress. Managers get reporting that tracks completion, scores, and participation trends across teams. The platform is designed to run recurring campaigns rather than one-off training events.
Pros
- Role-based learning paths help target training to job functions
- Recurring campaign workflows reduce manual coordination for admins
- Progress and completion reporting supports audit-ready tracking
- Short learning units improve completion rates for busy teams
- Automated reminders help maintain consistent learner engagement
Cons
- Limited visibility into phishing readiness beyond training completion
- Content customization options can feel constrained for unique programs
- Advanced analytics require more admin setup than basic reporting
- Integrations support can lag behind security suite ecosystems
Best For
Teams needing recurring security awareness training with role-based learning paths and reporting
Wizer
interactive-learningWizer trains users and teams with interactive learning paths that include security-focused exercises and assessments.
Phishing simulations with automatic training follow-ups driven by user actions and completion results
Wizer focuses on hands-on, self-paced security training delivered through interactive labs and custom content that mimics real workflows. It supports phishing simulations with targeted training paths and measurable user outcomes. The platform also includes reporting for organization-wide risk reduction and compliance-ready evidence of completion and performance.
Pros
- Interactive security labs help users practice remediation steps, not just read content.
- Phishing simulations link incidents to follow-up lessons and measurable learning outcomes.
- Centralized analytics provide completion and engagement metrics across teams.
Cons
- Scenario and lab setup can require more effort than simpler awareness platforms.
- Advanced customization and integrations take time to implement correctly.
- Reporting depth can feel complex for small teams focused on basic completion rates.
Best For
Security teams running interactive phishing and remediation training with measurable outcomes
Cybrary
course-basedCybrary provides security training courses, learning paths, and assessments for workforce upskilling and compliance learning.
Lab-based modules embedded in security training tracks
Cybrary distinguishes itself with a large catalog of role-focused security learning tracks and lab-driven skill practice. The platform provides curated courses across topics like SOC analysis, cloud security, penetration testing, and compliance foundations. It emphasizes hands-on modules, exam-aligned preparation resources, and structured paths that help learners progress. Progress tracking and instructor-led options support teams that need consistent training coverage across multiple people.
Pros
- Large security course catalog with structured learning paths
- Hands-on lab exercises that reinforce technical skills
- Progress tracking supports consistent team training
- Role-focused tracks for SOC, cloud, and security operations
Cons
- Course UI feels dated compared with newer security academies
- Lab depth varies by course, with some modules more lecture-heavy
- Enterprise reporting and admin controls are less robust than top LMS suites
- Learning paths can require extra time to find the right sequence
Best For
Teams training analysts on core security skills with guided course paths
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 education learning, KnowBe4 stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Security Training Software
This buyer’s guide helps you choose Security Training Software by matching phishing simulation, training automation, and reporting to your operational needs. It covers KnowBe4, Proofpoint Security Awareness, Cofense, Microsoft Defender Security Training, Hoxhunt, Jumio Security Awareness, GoPhish, Kitsune, Wizer, and Cybrary. You will use the same feature checklist and decision steps across all ten tools to narrow to the right fit.
What Is Security Training Software?
Security Training Software runs phishing simulations, delivers security awareness or remediation training, and tracks measurable outcomes such as click rates and training completion. It solves the problem of measuring human risk instead of relying on one-time training sessions that do not show behavior change. Many deployments also automate assignments so users who click receive targeted follow-up learning. Tools like KnowBe4 and Proofpoint Security Awareness combine simulations with automated training workflows and dashboards, while Microsoft Defender Security Training ties simulations to Microsoft 365 security signals.
Key Features to Look For
These features determine whether your program produces measurable behavior change and whether admins can run it consistently.
Automated training assignments based on user click behavior
Look for simulation-to-training automation that assigns remediation content when users click. KnowBe4 and Proofpoint Security Awareness both emphasize automated, targeted training assignments based on user actions. Wizer also links phishing incidents to follow-up lessons driven by user actions and completion results.
Telemetry-driven follow-up using click and report outcomes
Choose platforms that use both click and report telemetry to improve training relevance. Cofense uses user reporting workflows that route real actions into repeatable remediation steps. Microsoft Defender Security Training ties training follow-up to Defender telemetry so exposure and outcomes stay connected.
Role-based targeting for user groups, geographies, and job functions
Role-based scoping makes programs workable across departments and audiences. Proofpoint Security Awareness supports role-based assignments and scoping for different audiences and geographies. Kitsune and Jumio Security Awareness use role-based learning paths or role-based campaigns with admin analytics and progress reporting.
Campaign scheduling and recurring program workflows
Recurring workflows reduce admin effort and keep training from becoming a one-off event. KnowBe4 provides department-level campaign scheduling that admins can run on ongoing cadence. Kitsune focuses on recurring campaign workflows with automated reminders tied to learner progress.
Reporting dashboards that track clicks, completion, and engagement over time
Reporting should connect engagement metrics like clicks to training progress and outcomes. KnowBe4 offers detailed reporting dashboards tracking clicks and training completion by user group and department. Hoxhunt and Wizer provide clear program reporting for clicks and completion so managers can run consistent awareness cycles.
Integration paths that match your identity and security stack
Integrations determine how quickly you can onboard users and align training to security tooling. KnowBe4 integrates with common identity and security ecosystems for faster rollout. Microsoft Defender Security Training is built for Microsoft security customers and ties training to Defender for Endpoint signals, which reduces manual alignment work.
How to Choose the Right Security Training Software
Pick a tool by matching its simulation-to-training automation, telemetry depth, and admin workflow fit to your operating model.
Map your success metrics to the tool’s telemetry
Define whether you will measure only clicks and completion or also clicks and reports into remediation. Cofense uses click and report telemetry to drive action-based training follow-ups, while KnowBe4 and Proofpoint Security Awareness focus on click behavior tied to automated training assignment. Microsoft Defender Security Training ties training outcomes to Defender telemetry so you can connect exposure signals to user risk reduction.
Choose the automation style your admins can run
Decide whether you want out-of-the-box training workflows or you need highly flexible scripting. KnowBe4 emphasizes administrators configuring templates and targeting rules with automated phishing-to-training assignment. GoPhish offers configurable templates and staged campaigns, but more manual setup is required for complex automation compared with enterprise platforms like Proofpoint Security Awareness.
Validate role-based targeting and audience scoping
Confirm you can segment users by department, role, or job function so remediation matches likely failure modes. Proofpoint Security Awareness supports role-based assignments and scoping for different audiences and geographies. Kitsune uses role-based learning paths that adapt training assignments to learner responsibilities.
Align the simulation realism to your user behavior
Choose simulation formats that reflect how users actually interact with threats. Hoxhunt is built around mobile-first phishing simulations that adapt next steps based on user clicks. GoPhish includes landing pages for credential-harvesting simulations, which increases realism but also increases operational risk if governance is weak.
Select a deployment path that fits your environment and reporting needs
If your environment is Microsoft-first, Microsoft Defender Security Training provides integrated authoring and centralized reporting tied to Defender for Endpoint signals. If you need faster organization-wide rollout across identity and security tools, KnowBe4 is designed for integration-driven onboarding. If you need course catalog learning and technical skill tracks instead of only awareness, Cybrary provides role-focused security learning tracks with lab-driven modules.
Who Needs Security Training Software?
Security Training Software benefits organizations that must reduce human risk with measurable behavior change and repeatable campaigns.
Mid-market and enterprise teams standardizing phishing resilience through measurable training
KnowBe4 is a strong fit because it combines phishing simulation with an organization-wide security awareness program that ties click outcomes to automated training assignment. Its department-level campaign scheduling and detailed dashboards tracking clicks and completion by user group match teams that need ongoing operational consistency.
Organizations running ongoing phishing simulation programs with measurable training outcomes
Proofpoint Security Awareness is built around phishing simulations paired with interactive training modules and learning paths that reinforce targeted threats. Its role-based assignments and reporting for clicks and completion trends fit programs that run continuously across multiple teams and audiences.
Organizations that want click-to-report improvement and remediation workflows connected to real user actions
Cofense focuses on phishing security training tied directly to phishing click and reporting behavior. Its action-driven workflows route reported emails into repeatable remediation steps, which fits teams that treat user reporting as an input to security operations.
Microsoft security customers that want training integrated with Microsoft endpoint and identity signals
Microsoft Defender Security Training is the best match when you want attack simulation campaigns tied to Defender for Endpoint signals. It centralizes reporting that links simulation results to training progress, which reduces data alignment work in Microsoft security ecosystems.
Pricing: What to Expect
KnowBe4, Proofpoint Security Awareness, Cofense, Microsoft Defender Security Training, Hoxhunt, Jumio Security Awareness, GoPhish, Kitsune, and Wizer all start at $8 per user monthly with annual billing and have no free plan listed in the provided pricing facts. Cybrary and the rest of the ten-tool set also do not list a free plan in the provided pricing facts and start at $8 per user monthly with annual billing. Microsoft Defender Security Training and KnowBe4 provide enterprise pricing availability for larger deployments, and Proofpoint Security Awareness and Cofense provide enterprise pricing on request. Proofpoint Security Awareness and Cybrary describe contract pricing or enterprise pricing as quote-based for larger scope, and Microsoft Defender Security Training also lists enterprise pricing on request.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
These pitfalls show up when teams buy a tool that does not match their admin workload, reporting needs, or simulation risk tolerance.
Buying a platform without click-to-remediation automation
If your program relies on users only reading content, you lose the behavior-change loop that ties simulation results to follow-up learning. KnowBe4, Proofpoint Security Awareness, and Wizer all automate training assignment based on user actions or completion outcomes so remediation happens when users fail the simulation.
Overcomplicating targeting before you stabilize your user-group design
Campaign setup and targeting rule tuning can take time when you operate at larger scale. KnowBe4 and Proofpoint Security Awareness both note that setup or targeting rules take effort to tune, so you should start with fewer groups and expand once outcomes are measurable.
Using credential-harvesting simulations without tight governance
GoPhish supports credential-harvesting landing pages for credential theft simulations, which can increase operational risk if governance is weak. Cofense and Microsoft Defender Security Training emphasize measurement and workflows tied to safe follow-up, which makes them better choices when you want tighter operational control.
Choosing an awareness-only tool when you need interactive remediation practice
Cybrary provides lab-driven modules embedded in role-focused security learning tracks, which is different from awareness-only content. Wizer adds interactive labs and remediation practice, while platforms like Hoxhunt focus on adaptive awareness learning triggered by clicks.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated KnowBe4, Proofpoint Security Awareness, Cofense, Microsoft Defender Security Training, Hoxhunt, Jumio Security Awareness, GoPhish, Kitsune, Wizer, and Cybrary using four dimensions: overall capability, feature depth, ease of use, and value. We prioritized tools that can connect phishing simulation outcomes to automated or action-driven training follow-up, because measurable behavior change depends on that loop. KnowBe4 separated itself by combining flexible phishing simulation templates with automated training assignment based on user click behavior and detailed dashboards tracking clicks and completion by user group. We also treated admin workflow fit as a ranking factor because tools that feel dense or require heavier configuration tend to slow down recurring execution.
Frequently Asked Questions About Security Training Software
Which security training software best measures click and completion outcomes for a company-wide phishing program?
KnowBe4 and Proofpoint Security Awareness both track click and completion rates with reporting dashboards designed for ongoing phishing programs. Cofense goes further by routing real user reporting actions into follow-up workflows that measure click-to-report improvement.
What tool is the best fit if you want phishing simulations and training tightly tied to endpoint security signals?
Microsoft Defender Security Training is built to link attack simulation campaigns to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint signals. It automates training and reporting so simulation outcomes tie directly to user risk reduction efforts inside a Microsoft security stack.
Which platform supports credential-harvesting style phishing simulations with landing pages and per-user tracking?
GoPhish provides landing pages for credential-harvesting simulations along with simple dashboards that track opens, clicks, and report outcomes per user. It also supports reusable email templates and automated follow-ups based on user actions.
Which product is most suitable for mobile-style phishing training with adaptive next steps after clicks?
Hoxhunt delivers mobile-first phishing simulations with adaptive follow-up learning that triggers based on user actions. Its workflows emphasize end-user training and provide clear administrative reporting for awareness programs.
What option should I choose if I need role-based assignments and learning paths with progress analytics for compliance reporting?
Jumio Security Awareness includes role-based assignment, progress visibility, and analytics built for compliance-oriented reporting. Kitsune also supports role-based learning paths and recurring campaigns with manager reports that track completion, scores, and participation trends.
Do any of these security training platforms offer a free plan?
None of the listed products provide a free plan. KnowBe4 and Proofpoint Security Awareness explicitly have no free plan, and Cofense and Microsoft Defender Security Training also have paid entry plans that start at $8 per user monthly billed annually.
How do the pricing models compare for mid-market teams that need per-user subscriptions?
KnowBe4, Proofpoint Security Awareness, Cofense, Microsoft Defender Security Training, and Hoxhunt all start paid plans at $8 per user monthly with annual billing. GoPhish, Kitsune, and Wizer also show paid plans starting at $8 per user monthly with annual billing, while enterprise pricing is handled via request where stated.
Which tool is best when your workflow depends on user click and report telemetry feeding remediation actions?
Cofense is designed around phishing click and user reporting behavior that drives reaction training and reporting workflows. It captures user actions and uses them for targeted follow-ups instead of delivering generic education modules.
If we need hands-on labs and structured security skill paths rather than only awareness modules, which platform fits?
Cybrary offers a large catalog of role-focused security tracks with lab-driven practice and exam-aligned preparation resources. Cofense and KnowBe4 focus more on phishing simulations and awareness measurement, while Cybrary centers on skill-building paths and hands-on modules.
What common setup step should we plan for to make training assignments actionable across departments and identities?
KnowBe4 supports integration with identity providers and other security tools to streamline onboarding and align training with user risk signals. Jumio Security Awareness also integrates with identity and directory workflows so role-based user management and campaign rollout follow existing access processes.
Tools reviewed
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Education Learning alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of education learning tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare education learning tools→FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS
Not on this list? Let’s fix that.
Every month, thousands of decision-makers use Gitnux best-of lists to shortlist their next software purchase. If your tool isn’t ranked here, those buyers can’t find you — and they’re choosing a competitor who is.
Apply for a ListingWHAT LISTED TOOLS GET
Qualified Exposure
Your tool surfaces in front of buyers actively comparing software — not generic traffic.
Editorial Coverage
A dedicated review written by our analysts, independently verified before publication.
High-Authority Backlink
A do-follow link from Gitnux.org — cited in 3,000+ articles across 500+ publications.
Persistent Audience Reach
Listings are refreshed on a fixed cadence, keeping your tool visible as the category evolves.