
GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Cybersecurity Information SecurityTop 10 Best Remote Access Trojan Software of 2026
Ranking of remote access trojan software tools with technical criteria and tradeoffs, featuring Mythic, Metasploit Framework, Sliver, plus AnyDesk and others.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Brute Ratel is the best fit for enterprise engagements that need repeatable, interactive multi-host control for adversary simulation, while QuasarRAT works best if you want an open-source RAT reference you can modify for reverse engineering and IOC extraction.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Brute Ratel
Mission workflows that map operator steps to coordinated implant task execution across sessions.
Built for fits when engagements need interactive multi-host control with repeatable operator missions..
QuasarRAT
Editor pickRemote-control command loop is structured for interactive operator sessions rather than one-shot tasks.
Built for fits when analysts need a modifiable RAT reference for reverse engineering and IOC extraction..
AnyDesk
Editor pickSession recording tied to support sessions reduces rework by preserving what happened during remote control.
Built for fits when help desks need fast remote desktop sessions with recording and controlled enrollment..
Comparison Table
Brute Ratel
enterpriseCommercial red teaming C2 framework designed for adversary simulation and endpoint detection evasion testing.
Mission workflows that map operator steps to coordinated implant task execution across sessions.
Brute Ratel focuses on an operator console that handles live session management across multiple compromised endpoints. It supports rapid operator tasking through remote shell style interaction and structured operator tasks like file handling and interactive command execution. Operator scripting adds an automation surface for repeating sequences without manual re-typing of actions.
A key tradeoff is that Brute Ratel’s workflow favors operator control, which can reduce suitability for fully automated campaigns that do not need interactive decision points. A strong usage situation is analyst and adversary emulation work where operators need to chain actions across several endpoints and adjust steps based on live observations.
- +Mission-style operator workflow keeps multi-step actions consistent
- +Tasking and remote shell interaction feel fast during live sessions
- +Operator scripting enables repeatable play sequences
- +Session-centric UI supports multi-endpoint operational control
- –Operator-centric design can be awkward for fully unattended campaigns
- –Advanced use depends on careful operator workflow discipline
- –High activity can increase monitoring visibility on endpoints
- –Integrating external tooling often requires custom operator steps
Adversary emulation teams
Run interactive post-exploitation operator missions
More realistic operator emulation
Red teams
Coordinate actions across multiple endpoints
Lower operator workload
Show 1 more scenario
Threat researchers
Reproduce observer-driven post-exploitation steps
Repeatable analysis sessions
Structured missions help replicate branching decisions across reruns.
Best for: Fits when engagements need interactive multi-host control with repeatable operator missions.
QuasarRAT
SMBOpen-source remote administration tool for Windows implemented in C# with client-server architecture.
Remote-control command loop is structured for interactive operator sessions rather than one-shot tasks.
QuasarRAT targets practical operator control with an interactive remote shell loop and frequent operator-issued commands over a command-and-control channel. Modules are typically easy to locate in source form, which supports customization of capability boundaries and deployment behavior. The codebase also tends to include configurable connection settings, which affects how reliably agents reconnect and how operators manage session churn. This makes it a useful reference point for understanding remote access tooling tradeoffs in a static analysis and reverse engineering workflow.
A key tradeoff is that QuasarRAT’s customization usually requires source edits and rebuild steps, which slows rapid operator iterations compared with toolchains that expose more runtime configuration. A common usage situation is controlled malware sandbox analysis where analysts need repeatable remote command flows, artifact extraction, and IOC collection.
- +Modular source layout helps capability-focused customization
- +Operator command flow supports interactive remote shell sessions
- +Includes persistence logic for restart survival
- +Supports media capture workflows like screen and webcam capture
- –Customization requires code changes and rebuild cycles
- –Session reliability depends on operator-side reconnection handling
- –Capability coverage can be uneven across builds
- –Payload and control channel tuning adds setup overhead
Malware analysts
Remote command flow artifact extraction
Cleaner IOC and behavior mapping
Threat hunters
Detection validation on sample agents
More accurate detection tuning
Show 1 more scenario
Red-team engineers
Capability-limited RAT module testing
Focused coverage experiments
Supports source-level pruning of modules to test specific remote access behaviors under constraints.
Best for: Fits when analysts need a modifiable RAT reference for reverse engineering and IOC extraction.
AnyDesk
SMBRemote desktop software for unattended access, support, and administration.
Session recording tied to support sessions reduces rework by preserving what happened during remote control.
AnyDesk delivers interactive screen sharing with responsive cursor and input handling, which matters for support workflows that require fine-grained UI interaction. The client includes remote assistance features such as file transfer and session recording so support teams can review what occurred without asking users to retell steps. The admin layer enables access configuration across enrolled devices under a shared account structure, which helps keep remote sessions consistent across locations.
A tradeoff is that AnyDesk requires disciplined endpoint enrollment and permission hygiene to prevent broad access by accident. It fits best for help desks that need fast remote desktop handling for Windows and other supported environments, where file transfer and recorded sessions reduce back-and-forth.
- +Low-latency interactive control supports UI-heavy troubleshooting
- +Session recording helps resolve disputes and speeds incident reviews
- +File transfer supports common support workflows during remote sessions
- +Centralized endpoint enrollment supports consistent admin access
- –Access settings demand governance discipline to avoid over-permissioning
- –Automation and integration surface is lighter than RAT-grade tooling
- –Advanced workflow customization depends on the managed account approach
- –Session policies may require iterative tuning across device types
IT help desk teams
Resolve end-user UI issues remotely
Faster issue closure
Field support organizations
Transfer files during on-site remediation
Reduced back-and-forth
Show 1 more scenario
Systems administrators
Standardize access across enrolled devices
More predictable operations
Centralized account-based management helps apply consistent access controls to multiple endpoints.
Best for: Fits when help desks need fast remote desktop sessions with recording and controlled enrollment.
Metasploit Framework
enterprisePenetration testing framework with payload generation and remote access capabilities for authorized security assessments.
Metasploit RPC plus a module framework that supports custom post-exploitation modules and scripted operator workflows.
Metasploit Framework supports remote access style outcomes by combining exploit modules with payloads that create interactive sessions and enable command execution.
Its module architecture lets operators reuse consistent option sets across runs, which favors automation and integration into repeatable processes.
The framework is not a single turnkey agent that handles full command-and-control lifecycle without assembly work.
- +Large module catalog for exploitation and post-exploitation chaining to interactive sessions
- +Session and job management keeps multi-target operator work organized
- +RPC interface enables external automation for module runs and session handling
- +Extensible module system supports custom payload logic and operator workflows
- –RAT-like functionality depends on how payloads and listeners are composed
- –Hard governance for RBAC and audit logs is not a native administrative capability
- –Operational stealth requires manual tuning of payload behavior and network patterns
- –Post-exploitation depth varies widely by target and module maturity
Best for: Fits when penetration teams need repeatable exploit-to-remote-shell automation without building a C2 stack.
Cobalt Strike
enterpriseCommercial adversary simulation platform featuring beaconing remote access payloads for red team operations.
Beacon session management with interactive operator tasking and scripting hooks for repeatable post-exploitation workflows.
Cobalt Strike provides operator-driven command-and-control tooling built around interactive remote shell workflows and scripted tasking for post-exploitation sessions. It centers on operator consoles, beacon management, and configurable communication patterns for coordinating long-lived access.
The product also includes an extensibility model that supports custom tooling via its scripting and plugin interfaces, which increases automation for repeatable operator tasks. Governance features focus on session control and operational hygiene, but deeper organization-wide RBAC and audit reporting are not the primary design emphasis.
- +Interactive beacon console supports remote shell workflows with operator control
- +Extensibility via scripts and plugins enables custom automation for recurring tasks
- +Flexible listener and command execution workflows support varied operator playbooks
- +Tasking primitives allow scripted sequences across active sessions
- –Operational setup and parameter tuning require significant operator discipline
- –Governance tooling focuses on operator workflows, not enterprise RBAC and audit depth
- –Automation and API access are limited compared to fully programmatic C2 frameworks
- –Defender-grade reporting is thin since telemetry output is not the primary focus
Best for: Fits when controlled red-team operators need interactive session control plus scripting-driven task automation.
Mythic
enterpriseOpen-source command and control framework with modular architecture for custom remote access payload development.
Structured tasking and job dispatch lets operators chain multi-step actions with consistent agent state handling.
Mythic is an automation-first remote access trojan command-and-control framework built for operator workflows and agent tasking. It centers on a consistent operator console, agent lifecycle operations, and structured job dispatch so remote shells and follow-on actions can run in controlled sequences.
Mythic also provides an extensibility surface for custom tooling and integrations that let teams tailor task types, telemetry handling, and operator UX to their tradecraft. Its design favors repeatable operator procedures over ad hoc scripting, with a workflow model that supports throughput across multiple agents.
- +Tasking workflow supports structured job sequences across multiple agents
- +Extensibility supports custom operator tooling and task definitions
- +Agent lifecycle management covers common staging and reconfiguration actions
- +Operator console design keeps interactive remote shell operations organized
- –Admin governance and RBAC are not a strong fit for multi-role separation
- –Custom extensions raise the integration and maintenance burden for teams
- –Complex workflows can increase operator error rates without strict runbooks
- –Automation depth can be wasted when teams only need basic remote shell control
Best for: Fits when operator teams need repeatable tasking workflows and extension points for custom actions.
Havoc
SMBOpen-source command and control framework designed for red team operations and adversary emulation.
Modular operator tasking built to accommodate custom command handlers without redesigning core control flow.
Havoc is a remote access trojan software project that combines an agent and operators’ tooling around a modular command-and-control workflow. It focuses on operator-driven remote shell style interactions, with mechanisms designed to keep operator tasks manageable across multiple endpoints.
Havoc emphasizes extensibility through plugin-like building blocks, which affects how custom tasking logic is integrated. It also includes encrypted C2 traffic patterns to reduce visibility during command and data exchange.
- +Modular tasking improves adding custom operator workflows
- +Encrypted C2 traffic reduces straightforward network inspection
- +Multi-endpoint operator handling supports concurrent engagements
- +Extensibility supports custom command handlers
- –Operational setup requires careful configuration and governance discipline
- –Automation and API surface for external orchestration is limited
- –Endpoint telemetry and audit log depth are not operator-grade
- –Post-compromise feature coverage is narrower than dedicated frameworks
Best for: Fits when teams need modular command tasking across multiple endpoints and accept higher operator overhead.
ConnectWise Control
enterpriseRemote support and unattended access software for IT teams and service providers.
Role-based technician session permissions with controlled interaction modes inside a support-session workflow.
ConnectWise Control is a remote access and remote support tool that focuses on interactive sessions, not on payload execution. It provides managed technician access to endpoints through session brokering, agent connectivity, and policy-controlled viewing and control modes.
The product adds governance features for account permissions and session monitoring in an environment built around IT service workflows. It is better evaluated as command-and-control infrastructure for support and administration than as a malware RAT family implementation.
- +Granular technician access tied to ConnectWise identities and roles
- +Session controls support view-only versus full control workflows
- +Central session management reduces reliance on ad hoc remote tools
- +Audit-style session records help with operational review
- –Agent deployment and connectivity tuning require IT discipline
- –Extensibility depends more on administrative workflow than custom APIs
- –Deep automation for large-scale endpoint orchestration is limited
- –Live session tooling favors support use over covert operations
Best for: Fits when IT teams need governed, auditable remote support sessions under existing service workflows.
Splashtop Remote Support
SMBRemote support software with attended and unattended access for IT and MSP workflows.
Operator-directed support sessions with on-demand access and interactive control designed around ticket-based troubleshooting workflows.
Splashtop Remote Support is a remote-access support tool that lets operators view and control endpoints for help desk workflows. It provides interactive sessions with screen viewing and device control plus session management features for staffed support operations.
The product is built for IT troubleshooting rather than malware-style remote execution, so it lacks category behaviors like persistence mechanisms or encrypted command-and-control beacons. It can still function as a remote access RAT family analogue in the narrow sense that it enables remote shell-like operator control, file transfers, and live screen visibility during support sessions.
- +Interactive screen view and mouse and keyboard control for live troubleshooting
- +Session handling designed for help desk workflows instead of raw remote shell access
- +Cross-device support coverage for common endpoint types in support incidents
- +Operational tooling for managing active support sessions in staffed teams
- –Does not include documented deep automation and agentless extensibility for custom workflows
- –Governance tooling for fine-grained RBAC and audit logging can be limited for large enterprises
- –Agent-based deployment creates an operational dependency on endpoint installation
- –Advanced telemetry export for security teams is not a primary focus of the offering
Best for: Fits when staffed help desks need real-time control sessions with straightforward incident handling and minimal automation.
GoTo Resolve
enterpriseUnified IT support software with remote access, remote execution, and endpoint management.
GoTo admin console session and access governance for remote support technicians and enrolled endpoints.
GoTo Resolve is a remote access and remote support tool that enables technicians to reach endpoints for helpdesk workflows rather than providing a RAT family tooling chain. Core capabilities include remote control sessions, file transfers, and screen sharing built around interactive support, plus admin-visible session management in the GoTo admin console.
Integration centers on identity and device access policies across GoTo environments, which supports governed remote support rather than command-and-control infrastructure deployment. As a result, it is workable for legitimate remote access but not a close fit for RAT operator workflows like persistence mechanism design or reverse shell orchestration.
- +Interactive remote control and screen sharing for support sessions
- +Admin console visibility into technician activity and access policies
- +File transfer support inside approved support workflows
- +Identity and access controls reduce ad hoc endpoint exposure
- –No operator-grade API for custom automation, agent orchestration, or session scripting
- –No documented low-level execution controls suited for persistence mechanisms
- –Not built for reverse shell style remote shell command execution
- –RAT workflows like credential theft and keylogging are not supported as capabilities
Best for: Fits when helpdesk teams need governed interactive remote control for troubleshooting incidents.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 cybersecurity information security, Brute Ratel stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right remote access trojan software
This buyer's guide covers remote access trojan software buying decisions across Brute Ratel, Metasploit Framework, Mythic, and Cobalt Strike, plus QuasarRAT, Havoc, AnyDesk, ConnectWise Control, Splashtop Remote Support, and GoTo Resolve. The individual sections that follow focus on how each product handles operator tasking, remote shell interaction, and session control during multi-host work.
The guide also separates operator-first platforms such as Brute Ratel, Cobalt Strike, and Metasploit Framework from enterprise remote support tools such as ConnectWise Control, Splashtop Remote Support, and GoTo Resolve. Each tool card describes strengths and limits around workflow structure, governance depth, extensibility, and the practical friction that shows up during live operation.
Remote access trojan software for operator tasking, session control, and post-exploitation workflows
Remote access trojan software coordinates remote control to live endpoints using an operator command loop, session management, and repeatable task execution patterns. Brute Ratel emphasizes mission-style operator workflows that map multi-step actions to coordinated implant tasking across sessions.
Metasploit Framework targets repeatable exploitation-to-remote-shell automation through its module catalog and scripted operator workflows. Mythic and Cobalt Strike also focus on interactive session control, but they differ in how structured job dispatch versus operator task automation is handled during multi-agent operations.
Remote access trojan software capabilities that affect live operator work
Operator tasking structure determines whether multi-step actions stay consistent across sessions or devolve into ad hoc command execution. Brute Ratel treats mission workflows as the organizing layer for coordinated implant tasking across sessions.
Mission-style tasking versus interactive command loops
Brute Ratel maps operator steps to coordinated implant task execution across sessions with mission workflows. QuasarRAT structures a remote-control command loop for interactive operator sessions built for modifiable RAT reference work.
Workflow chaining for multi-target operator operations
Metasploit Framework pairs its module framework with Metasploit RPC for repeatable exploit-to-remote-shell automation and organized session and job management. Mythic uses structured tasking and job dispatch that chain multi-step actions while handling consistent agent state across multiple agents.
Interactive console control and scripting hooks
Cobalt Strike provides an interactive beacon console that supports remote shell workflows with operator control and scripting-driven task automation. Havoc offers modular operator tasking with custom command handlers, built to accept extensions without redesigning core control flow.
Governed remote support workflows with technician permissions
ConnectWise Control focuses on role-based technician session permissions and view-only versus full control session modes inside support-session workflows. GoTo Resolve provides an admin console with visibility into technician activity and access policies for enrolled endpoints.
Operational artifacts that reduce investigation rework
AnyDesk ties session recording to support sessions, which preserves what happened during remote control for incident reviews. Brute Ratel instead optimizes live session operator feedback and repeatable action execution during live multi-host work.
Extensibility surface for custom automation and operator tooling
Metasploit Framework exposes extensibility through a module framework and Metasploit RPC plus scripting-compatible workflows. Mythic and Havoc support extension points for custom actions, but Mythic shows higher operator workflow structure while Havoc emphasizes modular command handlers with higher operator overhead.
How to choose between operator-first platforms and IT remote support tools
Start by matching the expected operating model to the tasking system the platform actually uses during live work. Brute Ratel and Mythic emphasize structured job sequences, while Cobalt Strike and QuasarRAT emphasize interactive console control for operator-driven iteration.
Pick the tasking philosophy: mission chains or operator command loops
If the work needs repeatable multi-step actions across sessions, select Brute Ratel because it coordinates implant tasking through mission workflows. If the work needs interactive remote shell sessions where the operator iterates and modifies the workflow, select QuasarRAT because its remote-control command loop is built for operator-driven interaction.
Choose the orchestration mechanism: RPC and modules or structured jobs
If automation needs to chain exploitation to interactive remote shell work without building a C2 stack, select Metasploit Framework because its module catalog plus Metasploit RPC supports scripted post-exploitation chaining and job management. If the automation needs structured tasking with consistent agent state across multiple agents, select Mythic because it provides tasking and job dispatch with structured job sequences.
Validate extensibility and scripting depth against operational burden
If extending workflows needs to fit into a modular framework that already supports operator orchestration, select Cobalt Strike because scripts and plugins integrate into beacon session management workflows. If extending requires custom command handlers and teams accept higher operator overhead, select Havoc because its modular tasking is designed to accommodate custom handlers without redesigning core control flow.
Match governance needs to admin and role control coverage
If technician access control and session modes must map tightly to IT identities and auditable support-session workflows, select ConnectWise Control because it provides role-based technician session permissions and view-only versus full control modes. If helpdesk operators need an admin console view into technician activity and access policies for enrolled endpoints, select GoTo Resolve because it provides governed remote control through its admin console session controls.
Plan for the automation and integration surface before adoption
If a documented automation interface is required for custom operator tooling and repeatable workflows, select Metasploit Framework because Metasploit RPC pairs with a module framework for scripted operator chains. If integration breadth matters less than live session control speed and operator workflow consistency, select Brute Ratel because its mission workflow keeps multi-step actions consistent during live sessions.
Who should buy remote access trojan software
Operator-first platforms fit teams that run interactive operations across multiple hosts and need structured tasking that reduces operator mistakes. Enterprise remote support tools fit IT groups that require governed technician access inside support-session workflows.
Red teams and penetration testers doing repeatable exploit-to-remote-shell chains
Metasploit Framework fits workflows that need module-driven exploitation plus scripted post-exploitation chaining into interactive sessions using Metasploit RPC. The module catalog plus job management keeps multi-target operator work organized.
Operator teams running interactive multi-host sessions that must stay consistent across steps
Brute Ratel fits engagements that require mission-style operator workflows that coordinate implant task execution across sessions. Its tasking and remote shell interaction are designed for fast live operation.
Analysts or reverse-engineering teams that want a modifiable RAT reference and interactive control
QuasarRAT fits teams that need a modifiable RAT reference for reverse engineering and IOC extraction while using an interactive remote-control command loop. Code customization remains tied to rebuild cycles.
IT operations and help desks that need governed remote support under existing identities
ConnectWise Control fits IT teams that require role-based technician session permissions with controlled interaction modes like view-only and full control. Governance is anchored in ConnectWise identities and roles.
Helpdesk teams that must control and observe technician activity via an admin console
GoTo Resolve fits teams that need governed interactive remote control for troubleshooting incidents with admin console visibility into technician activity and access policies. The platform does not target operator-grade APIs for session scripting.
Common buyer pitfalls for remote access trojan software procurement
Most failures happen when a buyer chooses based on operator UI familiarity and ignores how tasking and governance are enforced during real operations. The mismatch shows up as session reliability issues, fragile operator workflows, or missing integration surfaces for automation.
Treating interactive session control as a substitute for structured mission tasking
Teams that need coordinated multi-step actions across sessions should not rely only on ad hoc operator command execution. Brute Ratel’s mission workflows prevent inconsistent step ordering during live sessions.
Assuming enterprise remote support governance equals operator-grade automation
ConnectWise Control and GoTo Resolve emphasize technician session governance and admin console visibility. They do not provide an operator-grade API surface for custom automation, agent orchestration, or session scripting.
Overlooking integration and automation surface before building workflows
Metasploit Framework supports scripted operator workflows through Metasploit RPC and its module framework, but RAT-like functionality depends on how payloads and listeners are composed. This design can require additional operator composition work compared with tasking-first consoles.
Underestimating operator workflow discipline for setup and tuning
Cobalt Strike requires operational setup and parameter tuning that depends on operator discipline. Havoc similarly requires careful configuration and governance discipline for modular tasking to function reliably.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated each platform on feature coverage for live operator session control, mission and job orchestration depth, and how that support translates into day-to-day operator workflows. Features accounted for 40% of the score, and operator and admin usability accounted for the remaining 60% split between ease and value.
Brute Ratel separated from the field by tying mission-style operator workflows to coordinated implant task execution across sessions while keeping tasking and remote shell interaction fast during live work. We also scored how each option handles multi-target work organization through session or job management, and how extensibility shows up through module frameworks, scripts, plugins, or custom task definitions.
Frequently Asked Questions About remote access trojan software
What technical interface differences matter most for operator tasking across Mythic, Cobalt Strike, and Brute Ratel?
Which tool is better aligned to automation via APIs, specifically Metasploit Framework versus Mythic?
How does extensibility change customization workflows in Havoc compared with QuasarRAT?
When is encrypted command traffic a deciding factor, and how do Havoc and Cobalt Strike differ there?
What breaks if an organization needs strict technician access boundaries, and how do ConnectWise Control and Cobalt Strike respond?
Which tool is closest to a legitimate help desk workflow, and where does it stop matching RAT-style operator tasking?
How do operator workflows differ when handling multiple endpoints, comparing Mythic and Havoc?
What data handling capabilities commonly appear in RAT-family tooling, and which specific tools provide operator-driven capture or file actions?
How should teams plan data migration for existing operator playbooks when moving between Metasploit Framework and Mythic?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
- Cybersecurity Information SecurityTop 10 Best Access Remote Software of 2026
- Cybersecurity Information SecurityTop 10 Best Anti Trojan Software of 2026
- Remote And Hybrid Work In IndustryTop 10 Best Computer Remote Access Software of 2026
- Cybersecurity Information SecurityTop 10 Best Remote Access Services of 2026
- Digital Transformation In IndustryTop 10 Best Remote Tech Services of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Cybersecurity Information Security alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of cybersecurity information security tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare cybersecurity information security tools→