Quick Overview
- 1#1: ScholarOne Manuscripts - Comprehensive cloud-based platform managing manuscript submissions, peer review, production, and reporting for scholarly journals.
- 2#2: Editorial Manager - Robust workflow system for manuscript submission, peer review tracking, and editorial management in academic publishing.
- 3#3: Open Journal Systems - Open-source software facilitating journal management from submission through peer review to online publication.
- 4#4: eJournalPress - Web-based system for streamlined peer review, manuscript tracking, and production workflows for journals and societies.
- 5#5: BenchPress - Collaborative platform for efficient article submission, review, revision, and production in open access publishing.
- 6#6: Submittable - Versatile submission platform for managing calls for papers, grants, awards, and publication entries with review tools.
- 7#7: Janeway - Open-source journal management system handling submissions, peer review, typesetting, and hosting.
- 8#8: ConfTool - Flexible conference and journal management software for abstract submissions, reviews, and program scheduling.
- 9#9: Morressier - Platform for discovering, sharing, and managing conference content including abstracts, posters, and videos.
- 10#10: OpenConf - Affordable web-based system for conference paper submissions, blind reviews, and proceedings management.
We selected and ranked these tools based on key factors like feature versatility, user-friendliness, reliability, and overall value, ensuring they deliver practical, long-term utility across journals, conferences, and societies.
Comparison Table
Publication management software is critical for efficiently managing academic and journal publishing workflows, and this comparison table examines key tools like ScholarOne Manuscripts, Editorial Manager, Open Journal Systems, eJournalPress, BenchPress, and more. It explores their core features, practical use cases, and suitability for different teams, helping readers identify the best fit for their operational needs, budget, and organizational goals.
| # | Tool | Category | Overall | Features | Ease of Use | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ScholarOne Manuscripts Comprehensive cloud-based platform managing manuscript submissions, peer review, production, and reporting for scholarly journals. | enterprise | 9.2/10 | 9.6/10 | 7.8/10 | 8.5/10 |
| 2 | Editorial Manager Robust workflow system for manuscript submission, peer review tracking, and editorial management in academic publishing. | enterprise | 8.7/10 | 9.4/10 | 7.2/10 | 8.3/10 |
| 3 | Open Journal Systems Open-source software facilitating journal management from submission through peer review to online publication. | specialized | 8.7/10 | 9.2/10 | 6.8/10 | 10.0/10 |
| 4 | eJournalPress Web-based system for streamlined peer review, manuscript tracking, and production workflows for journals and societies. | enterprise | 8.2/10 | 8.7/10 | 7.4/10 | 8.0/10 |
| 5 | BenchPress Collaborative platform for efficient article submission, review, revision, and production in open access publishing. | specialized | 8.7/10 | 9.2/10 | 8.1/10 | 9.0/10 |
| 6 | Submittable Versatile submission platform for managing calls for papers, grants, awards, and publication entries with review tools. | specialized | 8.7/10 | 9.2/10 | 8.0/10 | 8.3/10 |
| 7 | Janeway Open-source journal management system handling submissions, peer review, typesetting, and hosting. | specialized | 8.2/10 | 8.7/10 | 7.4/10 | 9.5/10 |
| 8 | ConfTool Flexible conference and journal management software for abstract submissions, reviews, and program scheduling. | specialized | 7.6/10 | 8.2/10 | 6.8/10 | 8.5/10 |
| 9 | Morressier Platform for discovering, sharing, and managing conference content including abstracts, posters, and videos. | specialized | 8.1/10 | 8.7/10 | 7.8/10 | 7.4/10 |
| 10 | OpenConf Affordable web-based system for conference paper submissions, blind reviews, and proceedings management. | other | 8.2/10 | 8.8/10 | 7.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
Comprehensive cloud-based platform managing manuscript submissions, peer review, production, and reporting for scholarly journals.
Robust workflow system for manuscript submission, peer review tracking, and editorial management in academic publishing.
Open-source software facilitating journal management from submission through peer review to online publication.
Web-based system for streamlined peer review, manuscript tracking, and production workflows for journals and societies.
Collaborative platform for efficient article submission, review, revision, and production in open access publishing.
Versatile submission platform for managing calls for papers, grants, awards, and publication entries with review tools.
Open-source journal management system handling submissions, peer review, typesetting, and hosting.
Flexible conference and journal management software for abstract submissions, reviews, and program scheduling.
Platform for discovering, sharing, and managing conference content including abstracts, posters, and videos.
Affordable web-based system for conference paper submissions, blind reviews, and proceedings management.
ScholarOne Manuscripts
enterpriseComprehensive cloud-based platform managing manuscript submissions, peer review, production, and reporting for scholarly journals.
AI-powered reviewer recommendation engine using manuscript taxonomy for precise matching
ScholarOne Manuscripts is a comprehensive web-based platform by Clarivate designed for managing the full lifecycle of scholarly publishing, from author submissions to peer review, editorial decisions, and production tracking. It supports thousands of journals worldwide with customizable workflows, automated routing, and advanced analytics. The system excels in handling high submission volumes while ensuring compliance with industry standards like ORCID and Crossref integrations.
Pros
- Robust end-to-end workflow automation for submissions, reviews, and production
- Scalable for high-volume journals with advanced reviewer matching and taxonomy tools
- Extensive integrations with ORCID, PubMed, and other scholarly databases
Cons
- Dated interface with a steep learning curve for new users
- High enterprise pricing unsuitable for small publishers
- Customization requires technical expertise and can lead to implementation delays
Best For
Large academic publishers, societies, and high-impact journals managing substantial submission volumes.
Pricing
Custom enterprise subscription pricing based on journal count, submission volume, and features; typically starts at several thousand dollars annually per journal—contact sales for quotes.
Editorial Manager
enterpriseRobust workflow system for manuscript submission, peer review tracking, and editorial management in academic publishing.
Advanced configurable peer-review engine that supports custom decision trees, cascade reviews, and multi-stage processes unique to complex journal policies
Editorial Manager, from Aries Systems, is a comprehensive web-based platform for managing the full editorial workflow in scholarly publishing, from manuscript submission and peer review to production tracking. It supports configurable workflows, automated notifications, and integration with tools like ORCID and CrossRef for metadata handling. Widely adopted by over 10,000 journals globally, it excels in high-volume environments requiring robust scalability and compliance with publishing standards.
Pros
- Highly configurable workflows tailored to specific journal needs
- Scalable for high submission volumes with strong analytics and reporting
- Seamless integrations with production systems and external databases
Cons
- Steep learning curve and dated interface for new users
- Complex initial setup requiring technical expertise
- Enterprise pricing can be prohibitive for small publishers
Best For
Large academic publishers and journal networks managing thousands of submissions annually.
Pricing
Custom enterprise subscription pricing, typically $5,000–$50,000+ per year per journal based on volume, features, and hosting.
Open Journal Systems
specializedOpen-source software facilitating journal management from submission through peer review to online publication.
Integrated peer-review workflow with automated notifications, reviewer assignments, and blind review support tailored for scholarly publishing
Open Journal Systems (OJS) is a free, open-source software platform developed by the Public Knowledge Project (PKP) for managing and publishing scholarly journals online. It provides a comprehensive workflow covering article submission, peer review, editing, production, indexing, and dissemination. Designed primarily for academic and non-profit publishers, OJS supports multi-journal hosting, reader tools like usage statistics, and integration with OAI-PMH for metadata harvesting.
Pros
- Fully free and open-source with no licensing costs
- Robust end-to-end editorial workflow including peer review and versioning
- Extensive customization options and strong community support
Cons
- Steep learning curve for setup and advanced configuration
- Dated user interface that feels clunky compared to modern SaaS tools
- Requires self-hosting and technical expertise for maintenance
Best For
Academic institutions, scholarly societies, or small non-profit publishers seeking a cost-free, customizable solution for managing open-access journals.
Pricing
Completely free (open-source); optional paid hosting services available from third parties.
eJournalPress
enterpriseWeb-based system for streamlined peer review, manuscript tracking, and production workflows for journals and societies.
Integrated production suite with direct XML/JATS export and typesetting automation for seamless transition from review to publication.
eJournalPress is a web-based platform providing end-to-end manuscript management for scholarly journals, including submission tracking, peer review coordination, editorial workflows, and production tools. It supports authors, editors, reviewers, and publishers in streamlining the publication process with customizable templates and automated notifications. The system also offers features like XML/HTML export, plagiarism checks, and analytics for journal metrics.
Pros
- Comprehensive workflow covering submission to production
- Highly customizable for specific journal needs
- Strong support for peer review and compliance reporting
Cons
- User interface feels dated compared to modern competitors
- Pricing lacks transparency and requires custom quotes
- Limited native integrations with third-party tools
Best For
Small to mid-sized academic societies and independent journals seeking a reliable, specialized publication management system.
Pricing
Custom pricing based on journal volume, submissions, and features; typically starts at $5,000-$10,000 annually per journal with quotes required.
BenchPress
specializedCollaborative platform for efficient article submission, review, revision, and production in open access publishing.
Configurable, journal-specific peer review workflows with real-time collaboration tools
BenchPress (benchpress.io) is an open-source manuscript submission and peer-review platform designed for academic journals and scholarly publishers. It manages the full editorial workflow, from author submissions and reviewer assignments to decision tracking and production handoff. Developed by eLife, it emphasizes modern usability, customization, and integrations with tools like ORCID and Crossref.
Pros
- Highly customizable workflows tailored to journal needs
- Strong integrations with scholarly identifiers and DOIs
- Modern, responsive interface with mobile support
Cons
- Initial setup requires technical expertise for self-hosting
- Limited built-in analytics compared to enterprise competitors
- Smaller user community leads to fewer third-party plugins
Best For
Small to medium-sized academic journals and society publishers looking for a cost-effective, flexible alternative to legacy systems like ScholarOne.
Pricing
Free self-hosted open-source version; hosted SaaS plans start at around $500/month for low-volume journals, scaling with submissions (custom quotes available).
Submittable
specializedVersatile submission platform for managing calls for papers, grants, awards, and publication entries with review tools.
Sophisticated blind review system with metadata tagging and multi-rater scoring for unbiased, scalable evaluation
Submittable is a robust submission management platform tailored for publications, literary magazines, grants, and awards programs to handle incoming manuscripts, artwork, and applications efficiently. It provides tools for customizable intake forms, blind peer reviews, collaborative feedback, and automated workflows to streamline the selection process. With integrations for email, Slack, and payment gateways, it supports organizations in managing high volumes of submissions while maintaining editorial integrity.
Pros
- Advanced collaboration tools for team reviews and feedback
- Highly customizable forms and multi-stage workflows
- Comprehensive analytics and reporting on submission trends
Cons
- Pricing scales quickly with submission volume, costly for small pubs
- Steeper learning curve for complex configurations
- Limited free tier and basic features in entry-level plans
Best For
Mid-to-large publications and editorial teams handling high-volume creative submissions that require blind reviews and collaborative decision-making.
Pricing
Starts at $99/month (Lite plan) for up to 500 submissions/year, up to $499+/month (Enterprise) for unlimited; volume-based tiers with annual discounts.
Janeway
specializedOpen-source journal management system handling submissions, peer review, typesetting, and hosting.
Extensible plugin architecture allowing seamless addition of custom features without core code changes
Janeway (janeway.systems) is an open-source journal management and publishing platform built on Django, designed specifically for scholarly publishers to handle the full editorial workflow. It supports submissions, peer review, production, typesetting, and online publishing for single or multiple journals. With a focus on modularity and extensibility, it provides a modern alternative to legacy systems like OJS, emphasizing clean code and customization for academic use.
Pros
- Completely free and open-source with no licensing fees
- Comprehensive workflow covering submissions to publication
- Modular plugin system for easy customization and extensions
Cons
- Requires technical expertise for self-hosted installation and maintenance
- Smaller community and fewer pre-built integrations than larger platforms
- UI can feel complex for non-technical editors initially
Best For
Ideal for tech-savvy academic societies, small presses, or universities managing open-access journals on a budget.
Pricing
Free open-source software (self-hosted); optional paid hosting or support available via partners.
ConfTool
specializedFlexible conference and journal management software for abstract submissions, reviews, and program scheduling.
Highly configurable review schemes supporting complex double-blind, open, and poster review processes
ConfTool is a web-based conference management system tailored for academic publication workflows, enabling organizers to handle paper submissions, reviewer assignments, blind review processes, and proceedings compilation. It supports customizable tracks, discussion forums for program committees, and automated notifications throughout the process. Primarily used for conferences, it provides end-to-end tools for managing publication pipelines in scholarly events.
Pros
- Comprehensive review management with configurable workflows
- Reliable performance for handling thousands of submissions
- Strong customization for diverse conference needs
Cons
- Dated user interface lacking modern design
- Limited third-party integrations
- Steeper learning curve for non-technical users
Best For
Academic conference organizers managing medium to large-scale submission and review processes.
Pricing
One-time fee per conference starting at €590 for up to 100 papers, up to €1,990 for unlimited submissions.
Morressier
specializedPlatform for discovering, sharing, and managing conference content including abstracts, posters, and videos.
Interactive 'Live Posters' that assign DOIs to conference posters, enabling citations and multimedia engagement
Morressier is a specialized platform for managing conference publications, handling abstract submissions, peer review, session scheduling, and transforming posters and presentations into interactive, citable online publications. It enables organizers to create discoverable content with DOIs, multimedia integration, and engagement analytics. Primarily tailored for academic and scientific events, it streamlines the publication workflow from submission to long-term archiving.
Pros
- Robust abstract management and peer review tools
- Interactive posters with DOIs and multimedia support
- Detailed engagement analytics for published content
Cons
- Limited to conference-focused workflows, less versatile for general publishing
- Pricing lacks transparency and requires custom quotes
- Steeper learning curve for non-technical users
Best For
Academic conference organizers seeking to digitize and enhance interactive publication experiences.
Pricing
Custom pricing based on event size, features, and duration; typically starts at several thousand euros per event—contact sales for quotes.
OpenConf
otherAffordable web-based system for conference paper submissions, blind reviews, and proceedings management.
Automated conflict-aware reviewer assignment and comprehensive proceedings generation
OpenConf is a web-based conference and publication management platform designed specifically for academic and professional events, handling everything from abstract and paper submissions to peer review and program scheduling. It supports blind reviews, automated reviewer assignments with conflict detection, customizable workflows, and generates conference proceedings and schedules. With a proven track record serving over 10,000 conferences worldwide, it provides secure, scalable solutions for organizers managing publication pipelines.
Pros
- Robust peer review system with conflict detection and blind review support
- Highly customizable workflows and templates for multiple tracks and submission types
- Reliable customer support and proven scalability for large conferences
Cons
- Outdated user interface that feels clunky compared to modern alternatives
- Steeper learning curve for initial setup and configuration
- Limited native integrations with contemporary tools like ORCID or modern CRMs
Best For
Academic conference organizers and journal editors managing medium to large-scale submission and review processes who value reliability and customization over sleek design.
Pricing
Per-conference pricing starts at $495 for up to 100 submissions, with tiers scaling to $2,995+ for 5,000+ submissions; custom quotes available.
Conclusion
The reviewed publication management tools showcase varied strengths, with ScholarOne Manuscripts leading as the top choice, boasting a comprehensive cloud-based platform for end-to-end scholarly journal workflows. Editorial Manager, a strong second, stands out for its robust peer review and editorial management systems, while Open Journal Systems completes the top three with its open-source flexibility, perfect for collaborative and community-focused journals. Each tool addresses unique needs, ensuring wide-ranging suitability for publishers of all types.
Ready to enhance your publication process? Dive into ScholarOne Manuscripts to experience a seamless, efficient solution designed to handle every stage of your workflow effortlessly.
Tools Reviewed
All tools were independently evaluated for this comparison
