GITNUXBEST LIST

Arts Creative Expression

Top 10 Best Publication Management Software of 2026

Discover the top 10 publication management software to streamline workflows. Compare features & choose the best fit—start optimizing today.

Sarah Mitchell

Sarah Mitchell

Feb 11, 2026

10 tools comparedExpert reviewed
Independent evaluation · Unbiased commentary · Updated regularly
Learn more
In the dynamic landscape of academic and professional publishing, robust publication management software is essential for optimizing workflows—from manuscript submissions and peer reviews to editorial oversight and production. With a range of tools, from comprehensive cloud-based platforms to open-source solutions, choosing the right system directly impacts efficiency and success. Our list highlights these top options, each tailored to meet diverse needs in scholarly communication.

Quick Overview

  1. 1#1: ScholarOne Manuscripts - Comprehensive cloud-based platform managing manuscript submissions, peer review, production, and reporting for scholarly journals.
  2. 2#2: Editorial Manager - Robust workflow system for manuscript submission, peer review tracking, and editorial management in academic publishing.
  3. 3#3: Open Journal Systems - Open-source software facilitating journal management from submission through peer review to online publication.
  4. 4#4: eJournalPress - Web-based system for streamlined peer review, manuscript tracking, and production workflows for journals and societies.
  5. 5#5: BenchPress - Collaborative platform for efficient article submission, review, revision, and production in open access publishing.
  6. 6#6: Submittable - Versatile submission platform for managing calls for papers, grants, awards, and publication entries with review tools.
  7. 7#7: Janeway - Open-source journal management system handling submissions, peer review, typesetting, and hosting.
  8. 8#8: ConfTool - Flexible conference and journal management software for abstract submissions, reviews, and program scheduling.
  9. 9#9: Morressier - Platform for discovering, sharing, and managing conference content including abstracts, posters, and videos.
  10. 10#10: OpenConf - Affordable web-based system for conference paper submissions, blind reviews, and proceedings management.

We selected and ranked these tools based on key factors like feature versatility, user-friendliness, reliability, and overall value, ensuring they deliver practical, long-term utility across journals, conferences, and societies.

Comparison Table

Publication management software is critical for efficiently managing academic and journal publishing workflows, and this comparison table examines key tools like ScholarOne Manuscripts, Editorial Manager, Open Journal Systems, eJournalPress, BenchPress, and more. It explores their core features, practical use cases, and suitability for different teams, helping readers identify the best fit for their operational needs, budget, and organizational goals.

Comprehensive cloud-based platform managing manuscript submissions, peer review, production, and reporting for scholarly journals.

Features
9.6/10
Ease
7.8/10
Value
8.5/10

Robust workflow system for manuscript submission, peer review tracking, and editorial management in academic publishing.

Features
9.4/10
Ease
7.2/10
Value
8.3/10

Open-source software facilitating journal management from submission through peer review to online publication.

Features
9.2/10
Ease
6.8/10
Value
10.0/10

Web-based system for streamlined peer review, manuscript tracking, and production workflows for journals and societies.

Features
8.7/10
Ease
7.4/10
Value
8.0/10
5BenchPress logo8.7/10

Collaborative platform for efficient article submission, review, revision, and production in open access publishing.

Features
9.2/10
Ease
8.1/10
Value
9.0/10

Versatile submission platform for managing calls for papers, grants, awards, and publication entries with review tools.

Features
9.2/10
Ease
8.0/10
Value
8.3/10
7Janeway logo8.2/10

Open-source journal management system handling submissions, peer review, typesetting, and hosting.

Features
8.7/10
Ease
7.4/10
Value
9.5/10
8ConfTool logo7.6/10

Flexible conference and journal management software for abstract submissions, reviews, and program scheduling.

Features
8.2/10
Ease
6.8/10
Value
8.5/10
9Morressier logo8.1/10

Platform for discovering, sharing, and managing conference content including abstracts, posters, and videos.

Features
8.7/10
Ease
7.8/10
Value
7.4/10
10OpenConf logo8.2/10

Affordable web-based system for conference paper submissions, blind reviews, and proceedings management.

Features
8.8/10
Ease
7.5/10
Value
8.0/10
1
ScholarOne Manuscripts logo

ScholarOne Manuscripts

enterprise

Comprehensive cloud-based platform managing manuscript submissions, peer review, production, and reporting for scholarly journals.

Overall Rating9.2/10
Features
9.6/10
Ease of Use
7.8/10
Value
8.5/10
Standout Feature

AI-powered reviewer recommendation engine using manuscript taxonomy for precise matching

ScholarOne Manuscripts is a comprehensive web-based platform by Clarivate designed for managing the full lifecycle of scholarly publishing, from author submissions to peer review, editorial decisions, and production tracking. It supports thousands of journals worldwide with customizable workflows, automated routing, and advanced analytics. The system excels in handling high submission volumes while ensuring compliance with industry standards like ORCID and Crossref integrations.

Pros

  • Robust end-to-end workflow automation for submissions, reviews, and production
  • Scalable for high-volume journals with advanced reviewer matching and taxonomy tools
  • Extensive integrations with ORCID, PubMed, and other scholarly databases

Cons

  • Dated interface with a steep learning curve for new users
  • High enterprise pricing unsuitable for small publishers
  • Customization requires technical expertise and can lead to implementation delays

Best For

Large academic publishers, societies, and high-impact journals managing substantial submission volumes.

Pricing

Custom enterprise subscription pricing based on journal count, submission volume, and features; typically starts at several thousand dollars annually per journal—contact sales for quotes.

2
Editorial Manager logo

Editorial Manager

enterprise

Robust workflow system for manuscript submission, peer review tracking, and editorial management in academic publishing.

Overall Rating8.7/10
Features
9.4/10
Ease of Use
7.2/10
Value
8.3/10
Standout Feature

Advanced configurable peer-review engine that supports custom decision trees, cascade reviews, and multi-stage processes unique to complex journal policies

Editorial Manager, from Aries Systems, is a comprehensive web-based platform for managing the full editorial workflow in scholarly publishing, from manuscript submission and peer review to production tracking. It supports configurable workflows, automated notifications, and integration with tools like ORCID and CrossRef for metadata handling. Widely adopted by over 10,000 journals globally, it excels in high-volume environments requiring robust scalability and compliance with publishing standards.

Pros

  • Highly configurable workflows tailored to specific journal needs
  • Scalable for high submission volumes with strong analytics and reporting
  • Seamless integrations with production systems and external databases

Cons

  • Steep learning curve and dated interface for new users
  • Complex initial setup requiring technical expertise
  • Enterprise pricing can be prohibitive for small publishers

Best For

Large academic publishers and journal networks managing thousands of submissions annually.

Pricing

Custom enterprise subscription pricing, typically $5,000–$50,000+ per year per journal based on volume, features, and hosting.

3
Open Journal Systems logo

Open Journal Systems

specialized

Open-source software facilitating journal management from submission through peer review to online publication.

Overall Rating8.7/10
Features
9.2/10
Ease of Use
6.8/10
Value
10.0/10
Standout Feature

Integrated peer-review workflow with automated notifications, reviewer assignments, and blind review support tailored for scholarly publishing

Open Journal Systems (OJS) is a free, open-source software platform developed by the Public Knowledge Project (PKP) for managing and publishing scholarly journals online. It provides a comprehensive workflow covering article submission, peer review, editing, production, indexing, and dissemination. Designed primarily for academic and non-profit publishers, OJS supports multi-journal hosting, reader tools like usage statistics, and integration with OAI-PMH for metadata harvesting.

Pros

  • Fully free and open-source with no licensing costs
  • Robust end-to-end editorial workflow including peer review and versioning
  • Extensive customization options and strong community support

Cons

  • Steep learning curve for setup and advanced configuration
  • Dated user interface that feels clunky compared to modern SaaS tools
  • Requires self-hosting and technical expertise for maintenance

Best For

Academic institutions, scholarly societies, or small non-profit publishers seeking a cost-free, customizable solution for managing open-access journals.

Pricing

Completely free (open-source); optional paid hosting services available from third parties.

4
eJournalPress logo

eJournalPress

enterprise

Web-based system for streamlined peer review, manuscript tracking, and production workflows for journals and societies.

Overall Rating8.2/10
Features
8.7/10
Ease of Use
7.4/10
Value
8.0/10
Standout Feature

Integrated production suite with direct XML/JATS export and typesetting automation for seamless transition from review to publication.

eJournalPress is a web-based platform providing end-to-end manuscript management for scholarly journals, including submission tracking, peer review coordination, editorial workflows, and production tools. It supports authors, editors, reviewers, and publishers in streamlining the publication process with customizable templates and automated notifications. The system also offers features like XML/HTML export, plagiarism checks, and analytics for journal metrics.

Pros

  • Comprehensive workflow covering submission to production
  • Highly customizable for specific journal needs
  • Strong support for peer review and compliance reporting

Cons

  • User interface feels dated compared to modern competitors
  • Pricing lacks transparency and requires custom quotes
  • Limited native integrations with third-party tools

Best For

Small to mid-sized academic societies and independent journals seeking a reliable, specialized publication management system.

Pricing

Custom pricing based on journal volume, submissions, and features; typically starts at $5,000-$10,000 annually per journal with quotes required.

5
BenchPress logo

BenchPress

specialized

Collaborative platform for efficient article submission, review, revision, and production in open access publishing.

Overall Rating8.7/10
Features
9.2/10
Ease of Use
8.1/10
Value
9.0/10
Standout Feature

Configurable, journal-specific peer review workflows with real-time collaboration tools

BenchPress (benchpress.io) is an open-source manuscript submission and peer-review platform designed for academic journals and scholarly publishers. It manages the full editorial workflow, from author submissions and reviewer assignments to decision tracking and production handoff. Developed by eLife, it emphasizes modern usability, customization, and integrations with tools like ORCID and Crossref.

Pros

  • Highly customizable workflows tailored to journal needs
  • Strong integrations with scholarly identifiers and DOIs
  • Modern, responsive interface with mobile support

Cons

  • Initial setup requires technical expertise for self-hosting
  • Limited built-in analytics compared to enterprise competitors
  • Smaller user community leads to fewer third-party plugins

Best For

Small to medium-sized academic journals and society publishers looking for a cost-effective, flexible alternative to legacy systems like ScholarOne.

Pricing

Free self-hosted open-source version; hosted SaaS plans start at around $500/month for low-volume journals, scaling with submissions (custom quotes available).

Visit BenchPressbenchpress.io
6
Submittable logo

Submittable

specialized

Versatile submission platform for managing calls for papers, grants, awards, and publication entries with review tools.

Overall Rating8.7/10
Features
9.2/10
Ease of Use
8.0/10
Value
8.3/10
Standout Feature

Sophisticated blind review system with metadata tagging and multi-rater scoring for unbiased, scalable evaluation

Submittable is a robust submission management platform tailored for publications, literary magazines, grants, and awards programs to handle incoming manuscripts, artwork, and applications efficiently. It provides tools for customizable intake forms, blind peer reviews, collaborative feedback, and automated workflows to streamline the selection process. With integrations for email, Slack, and payment gateways, it supports organizations in managing high volumes of submissions while maintaining editorial integrity.

Pros

  • Advanced collaboration tools for team reviews and feedback
  • Highly customizable forms and multi-stage workflows
  • Comprehensive analytics and reporting on submission trends

Cons

  • Pricing scales quickly with submission volume, costly for small pubs
  • Steeper learning curve for complex configurations
  • Limited free tier and basic features in entry-level plans

Best For

Mid-to-large publications and editorial teams handling high-volume creative submissions that require blind reviews and collaborative decision-making.

Pricing

Starts at $99/month (Lite plan) for up to 500 submissions/year, up to $499+/month (Enterprise) for unlimited; volume-based tiers with annual discounts.

Visit Submittablesubmittable.com
7
Janeway logo

Janeway

specialized

Open-source journal management system handling submissions, peer review, typesetting, and hosting.

Overall Rating8.2/10
Features
8.7/10
Ease of Use
7.4/10
Value
9.5/10
Standout Feature

Extensible plugin architecture allowing seamless addition of custom features without core code changes

Janeway (janeway.systems) is an open-source journal management and publishing platform built on Django, designed specifically for scholarly publishers to handle the full editorial workflow. It supports submissions, peer review, production, typesetting, and online publishing for single or multiple journals. With a focus on modularity and extensibility, it provides a modern alternative to legacy systems like OJS, emphasizing clean code and customization for academic use.

Pros

  • Completely free and open-source with no licensing fees
  • Comprehensive workflow covering submissions to publication
  • Modular plugin system for easy customization and extensions

Cons

  • Requires technical expertise for self-hosted installation and maintenance
  • Smaller community and fewer pre-built integrations than larger platforms
  • UI can feel complex for non-technical editors initially

Best For

Ideal for tech-savvy academic societies, small presses, or universities managing open-access journals on a budget.

Pricing

Free open-source software (self-hosted); optional paid hosting or support available via partners.

Visit Janewayjaneway.systems
8
ConfTool logo

ConfTool

specialized

Flexible conference and journal management software for abstract submissions, reviews, and program scheduling.

Overall Rating7.6/10
Features
8.2/10
Ease of Use
6.8/10
Value
8.5/10
Standout Feature

Highly configurable review schemes supporting complex double-blind, open, and poster review processes

ConfTool is a web-based conference management system tailored for academic publication workflows, enabling organizers to handle paper submissions, reviewer assignments, blind review processes, and proceedings compilation. It supports customizable tracks, discussion forums for program committees, and automated notifications throughout the process. Primarily used for conferences, it provides end-to-end tools for managing publication pipelines in scholarly events.

Pros

  • Comprehensive review management with configurable workflows
  • Reliable performance for handling thousands of submissions
  • Strong customization for diverse conference needs

Cons

  • Dated user interface lacking modern design
  • Limited third-party integrations
  • Steeper learning curve for non-technical users

Best For

Academic conference organizers managing medium to large-scale submission and review processes.

Pricing

One-time fee per conference starting at €590 for up to 100 papers, up to €1,990 for unlimited submissions.

Visit ConfToolconftool.net
9
Morressier logo

Morressier

specialized

Platform for discovering, sharing, and managing conference content including abstracts, posters, and videos.

Overall Rating8.1/10
Features
8.7/10
Ease of Use
7.8/10
Value
7.4/10
Standout Feature

Interactive 'Live Posters' that assign DOIs to conference posters, enabling citations and multimedia engagement

Morressier is a specialized platform for managing conference publications, handling abstract submissions, peer review, session scheduling, and transforming posters and presentations into interactive, citable online publications. It enables organizers to create discoverable content with DOIs, multimedia integration, and engagement analytics. Primarily tailored for academic and scientific events, it streamlines the publication workflow from submission to long-term archiving.

Pros

  • Robust abstract management and peer review tools
  • Interactive posters with DOIs and multimedia support
  • Detailed engagement analytics for published content

Cons

  • Limited to conference-focused workflows, less versatile for general publishing
  • Pricing lacks transparency and requires custom quotes
  • Steeper learning curve for non-technical users

Best For

Academic conference organizers seeking to digitize and enhance interactive publication experiences.

Pricing

Custom pricing based on event size, features, and duration; typically starts at several thousand euros per event—contact sales for quotes.

Visit Morressiermorressier.com
10
OpenConf logo

OpenConf

other

Affordable web-based system for conference paper submissions, blind reviews, and proceedings management.

Overall Rating8.2/10
Features
8.8/10
Ease of Use
7.5/10
Value
8.0/10
Standout Feature

Automated conflict-aware reviewer assignment and comprehensive proceedings generation

OpenConf is a web-based conference and publication management platform designed specifically for academic and professional events, handling everything from abstract and paper submissions to peer review and program scheduling. It supports blind reviews, automated reviewer assignments with conflict detection, customizable workflows, and generates conference proceedings and schedules. With a proven track record serving over 10,000 conferences worldwide, it provides secure, scalable solutions for organizers managing publication pipelines.

Pros

  • Robust peer review system with conflict detection and blind review support
  • Highly customizable workflows and templates for multiple tracks and submission types
  • Reliable customer support and proven scalability for large conferences

Cons

  • Outdated user interface that feels clunky compared to modern alternatives
  • Steeper learning curve for initial setup and configuration
  • Limited native integrations with contemporary tools like ORCID or modern CRMs

Best For

Academic conference organizers and journal editors managing medium to large-scale submission and review processes who value reliability and customization over sleek design.

Pricing

Per-conference pricing starts at $495 for up to 100 submissions, with tiers scaling to $2,995+ for 5,000+ submissions; custom quotes available.

Visit OpenConfopenconf.com

Conclusion

The reviewed publication management tools showcase varied strengths, with ScholarOne Manuscripts leading as the top choice, boasting a comprehensive cloud-based platform for end-to-end scholarly journal workflows. Editorial Manager, a strong second, stands out for its robust peer review and editorial management systems, while Open Journal Systems completes the top three with its open-source flexibility, perfect for collaborative and community-focused journals. Each tool addresses unique needs, ensuring wide-ranging suitability for publishers of all types.

ScholarOne Manuscripts logo
Our Top Pick
ScholarOne Manuscripts

Ready to enhance your publication process? Dive into ScholarOne Manuscripts to experience a seamless, efficient solution designed to handle every stage of your workflow effortlessly.