GITNUXSOFTWARE REVIEW
Music And AudioTop 10 Best Print Music Software of 2026
Compare print music software tools like Crescendo, Noteflight, and Sibelius, with use-case notes for musicians and schools.
How we ranked these tools
Vendors set the topic, but our editors set the inclusion criteria and the evaluation framework before research starts.
Search agents gather the source set and the review record, including transcriptions of video reviews and podcasts.
Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page. This does not influence our reviews. Editorial policy
Crescendo is the best overall pick for arrangers who mainly need dependable sheet output and vector-ready exports without fuss, because its layout-first printing controls keep page formatting consistent while scaling cleanly for rehearsal documents. Noteflight is the better alternative for collaborative browser work, since shared in-document editing and review flows reduce setup friction.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Crescendo
Vector export for notation pages supports reuse in layout tools without quality loss.
Best for: Fits when arrangers need reliable sheet output and vector-ready exports without coding integration work.
Noteflight
Editor pickCollaborative score editing and review flows inside the same Noteflight score document.
Best for: Fits when browser-based composing and sharing matter more than maximum engraving control.
Sibelius
Editor pickTime-saving engraving consistency that preserves spacing relationships as layouts and parts change.
Best for: Fits when editors need consistent engraving and fast revision cycles for concert-ready scores.
Comparison Table
Crescendo
vertical specialistEntry-level music notation editor from NCH Software for creating and printing simple scores.
Vector export for notation pages supports reuse in layout tools without quality loss.
Crescendo’s core editing workflow centers on constructing notation in an interactive score, then producing publishable output through its engraving and layout controls. It is designed to handle typical arrangement tasks like part extraction and score formatting without requiring a separate engraving engine workflow. Export includes print-oriented formats and vector output for downstream layout in design tools.
A tradeoff is that Crescendo’s integration surface is narrower than the most automation-heavy tools, so larger studios often rely on manual refinement for complex publishing variants. Crescendo works best when teams need consistent sheet output for ensemble parts and revisions, rather than deep programmatic integration across an enterprise system.
- +Print-first layout controls produce consistent page formatting
- +Vector export supports clean scaling for rehearsal and prep documents
- +Score editing flow stays focused on notation and parts
- +Revision workflow supports practical updates across ensemble materials
- –Automation and API surface are limited for studio-scale pipelines
- –Advanced orchestration workflows take more manual adjustment than some competitors
Arranging teams
Generate rehearsal parts from a master
Faster rehearsal document production
Studio copyists
Update revised movements for ensembles
Lower revision turnaround time
Show 1 more scenario
Music department production
Create printable scores for events
More consistent print delivery
Departments format scores for readable pages and export artifacts for event distribution.
Best for: Fits when arrangers need reliable sheet output and vector-ready exports without coding integration work.
Noteflight
SMBBrowser-based music notation platform with education-focused features and a score marketplace.
Collaborative score editing and review flows inside the same Noteflight score document.
Noteflight generates PDF score output from a browser-based notation editor with automatic score layout and typography rules.
MusicXML import and export support transferring material between notation ecosystems, with remaining fixes often needed for dense, edge-case notation.
Score playback supports rehearsal and arrangement checks before final export.
- +In-browser notation editor removes installation friction for score work
- +Fast sharing and browser-based collaboration for review with musicians
- +MusicXML import and export supports round-tripping with desktop tools
- +Score playback helps verify harmony, rhythm, and arrangement choices
- –Import can require manual cleanup for complex layout and engraving
- –Advanced engraving control is lighter than desktop engraving workflows
- –Large scores can feel slower than specialized desktop editors
- –Automation depth for bulk revisions is limited compared with pro suites
music teachers and students
assign and review browser notation
shareable lesson scores
students and instrumentalists
check timing with playback controls
audible timing reference
Show 2 more scenarios
composers and arrangers
publish collaborative score revisions
common online score
Publish scores as shareable online views so collaborators and performers can review notation changes.
music technologists
exchange MusicXML and MIDI assets
portable scores and MIDI
Import or export MusicXML and export MIDI to move compositions between notation and sequencing tools.
Best for: Fits when browser-based composing and sharing matter more than maximum engraving control.
Sibelius
enterpriseProfessional music notation software offering tiered subscriptions from Sibelius First to Ultimate.
Time-saving engraving consistency that preserves spacing relationships as layouts and parts change.
Sibelius centers on fast notation entry and iterative engraving, with page layout controls that keep spacing stable as parts change. The workflow supports part extraction for printing and distributing individual instruments, plus score playback for checking phrasing and rhythm before exporting.
A tradeoff appears when projects require deep automation or custom data workflows, since extending behavior depends more on the built-in feature set than on a broad developer API. Sibelius fits situations where repeated score revisions are frequent and the team wants predictable results from the same engraving engine across multiple PDF score outputs.
- +Predictable engraving output across dense scores and multi-part layouts
- +Fast input workflow for notation, editing, and iterative revisions
- +Score playback checks rhythm and balance before committing exports
- +Reliable part extraction for distributing instrument scores
- –Limited room for bespoke automation beyond built-in tooling
- –Advanced layout tweaks can take time on large orchestral pages
- –Some format interchange paths can require manual cleanup
- –Automation for repetitive editorial tasks depends on available commands
Professional composers
Draft to print-ready concert scores
Fewer layout regressions
Arrangers
Create transposed parts from one score
Cleaner part deliverables
Show 2 more scenarios
Copyists
Update large ensembles under deadlines
Faster turnaround
Apply edits and keep page spacing controlled while distributing updated parts for rehearsals.
Music publishers
Standardize print outputs across revisions
Consistent print formatting
Use repeatable engraving output patterns to keep typography consistent across successive editions.
Best for: Fits when editors need consistent engraving and fast revision cycles for concert-ready scores.
Dorico
enterpriseModern notation engine from Steinberg with advanced engraving algorithms and flexible workflows.
Engraver-grade formatting controls that maintain consistent layout rules while updating transposition and extracted parts together.
Dorico is a notation editor built around a high-precision engraving engine that keeps layout rules consistent across full scores and extracted parts. Editing happens at the musical-semantic level, so transposition, part extraction, and rhythmic fixes propagate through the score without manual re-laying out staves. Playback and export workflows support practical production needs such as vector output and standard interoperability formats for interchange and review.
- +Engraving engine produces consistent score layout and spacing across complex passages
- +MusicXML import preserves many structures for migration into Dorico
- +Part extraction tools handle multiple layouts without repeating layout work
- +Playback support covers practical rendering for rehearsals and quick checks
- –Advanced engraver options require learning engraving concepts and workflows
- –Some specialized notation workflows depend on project-specific setup choices
- –Large custom template libraries take time to maintain across revisions
- –Editing for rare engraving edge cases can be slower than in text-entry workflows
music archives and publishers
convert scans into editable notation
corrected digital score
composers and arrangers
build playable multi-part scores
playable editable score
Show 2 more scenarios
transcribers and educators
transcribe MIDI into printable notation
editable engraved score
Import MIDI note and timing data then refine it into readable, printable engraved pages.
guitarists and arrangers
write linked tablature and staff
consistent tablature
Create tablature and standard notation while keeping tuning, rhythm, spacing, and playback connected.
Best for: Fits when composers need consistent engraving and dependable part extraction for multi-instrument scores.
MuseScore
vertical specialistFree, open-source music notation software with a desktop editor and online score-sharing platform.
Score layout export to PDF and SVG directly from the notation workspace with engraving-focused pagination.
MuseScore targets notation editors who need fast score building, then clean print outputs without leaving the editing environment. Score playback supports MIDI style performance, and exports can generate print-ready pages for rehearsal packs and distribution. MusicXML interchange covers key workflow needs like part extraction for arrangements and moving projects between tools.
- +Fast keyboard-driven notation entry with immediate layout feedback
- +MusicXML import and export for cross-tool score interchange
- +Export to PDF and SVG for print and design workflows
- +Consistent engraving behavior tuned for publishable page layout
- –Limited built-in multi-user governance compared with desktop incumbents
- –Advanced layout customization can require manual adjustments
- –Playback and sound output quality depends on installed instruments
- –Large scores can feel slower during heavy editing
Composers and arrangers
Draft arrangements with printable outputs
Faster turnaround between drafts
Music production teams
Transfer scores between DAW and notation
Fewer manual retypes
Show 1 more scenario
Educators
Distribute student practice scores
Uniform handouts across classes
Generate consistent page layouts and export to printable formats for worksheets.
Best for: Fits when composers need quick engraving, MusicXML exchange, and dependable PDF output for small workflows.
Flat
SMBCollaborative, web-based music notation editor with real-time multi-user editing.
Flat’s revision history ties directly to ongoing score editing sessions in the browser.
Flat targets composers and arrangers who need an online notation editor with reliable score publishing outputs. It provides core engraving workflows through a browser-based notation editor that supports standard imports and editor tools like parts and transposition.
- +Browser-first notation editor reduces setup friction for score drafting
- +Vector score rendering supports crisp PDF-like print output
- +Revision history helps track score edits across multiple sessions
- +MusicXML import and export fit common interchange workflows
- –Advanced engraving controls lag behind desktop-first engraving workflows
- –Large scores can feel slower during frequent edits
- –Playback and sound customization depend on external instrument choices
- –Complex multi-part extraction can require manual cleanup
chromebook users and schools
write notation with no installs
playback in browser
music teachers and students
collect student scores in shared projects
submission-ready scores
Show 2 more scenarios
arrangers and ensembles
check and print rehearsal-ready parts
playable printable parts
Develop multi-instrument arrangements, use playback for checks, then produce printable rehearsal materials.
midi composers and arrangers
turn MIDI into editable notation
editable notation from MIDI
Import MIDI, refine in staff or piano-roll views, and export notation back when sequencing handoffs are needed.
Best for: Fits when composers need browser-based drafting with export-ready print output for ongoing collaboration.
ScoreCloud
vertical specialistNotation software that transcribes audio and MIDI input into editable sheet music.
Configurable production workflows that turn managed musical inputs into repeatable publishing exports with consistent formatting behavior.
ScoreCloud is a print music workflow tool aimed at teams that need repeatable score outputs from managed materials. It centers on score document generation with an integration-first approach for importing music content and producing publishing-ready exports.
- +Production-oriented exports that keep repeated layouts consistent
- +Workflow configuration reduces manual steps for part generation
- +Integration options fit environments that generate scores programmatically
- +Repeatable revision output supports faster publishing cycles
- –Less flexible for deep, day-to-day notation editing than editor-first tools
- –Complex workflows need careful configuration to avoid layout surprises
- –Coverage for edge-case engraving behaviors can be limited versus full editors
- –Automation depends on disciplined input preparation and file quality
music teachers and students
revise student-friendly scores online
playable updated score
musicians documenting performances
turn practice recordings into notation drafts
editable score draft
Show 2 more scenarios
teachers and arrangers
export shareable rehearsal material
shareable rehearsal score
Edit ensemble scores then export or share them as rehearsal-ready print outputs for musicians.
songwriters and accompanists
draft chord-based lead sheets
editable lead sheet
Create and refine melody and chord notation from a musical idea into an editable lead sheet format.
Best for: Fits when editorial teams need controlled, repeatable score production from managed inputs and integrations.
Encore
vertical specialistLegacy music notation software maintained by Passport Music Software for print score production.
Repeatable page layout tuning for print production, including staff spacing and lyric alignment that stays consistent through revisions.
Encore converts recorded music and notation workflows into printable scores by connecting a performance-centric workflow with music typography controls. It supports MusicXML import and score editing focused on parts, page layout, and publication-grade output to PDF and vector formats.
- +Strong page-layout controls for predictable printing across multi-part scores
- +MusicXML import workflow supports transferring structure into edit-ready scores
- +Vector export options support high-fidelity score reuse in production pipelines
- +Part extraction and transposition support revision workflows for standardized parts
- –Advanced engraving behaviors can require manual tweaks after complex imports
- –Limited automation tooling compared with higher-ranked editor ecosystems
- –Playback tuning depends on external instrument mapping setup for consistent results
- –Large score performance is less responsive than top contenders during heavy edits
composers and publishers
refine printed page turns and lyrics
consistent page layout
piano arrangers
prepare dense piano arrangements
clear piano score
Show 2 more scenarios
music educators
generate teaching exercises with readable pages
readable classroom materials
Create instructional scores emphasizing notation clarity and readable printed output for lessons.
composers and transcribers
convert MIDI into editable staff scores
editable staff score
Use MIDI capture or step entry to start notation then produce an editable staff score.
Best for: Fits when a composer needs reliable printing output from import-and-edit workflows with dependable layout control.
capella
vertical specialistGerman music notation software with a focus on choral and vocal score publishing.
Revision-focused score management that keeps engraving changes from resetting the entire layout.
capella focuses on print-first music notation with a workflow designed around score construction, not just playback. It provides a notation editor that targets engraving-ready layout control for instruments, staves, lyrics, and rehearsal markings.
- +Print-oriented engraving controls produce consistent layout during edits
- +MusicXML import and export supports practical tool-to-tool interchange
- +Score output targets PDF rendering suitable for production review
- +Revision-focused workflow reduces rework across iterative score changes
- –Automation coverage for large parts can require manual layout decisions
- –Advanced engraving adjustments can take more clicks than expected
- –Deep automation is less complete for specialized rehearsal and lyric workflows
- –Some format paths depend on how MusicXML content is authored upstream
independent publishers
engrave settings for distribution-ready sheet music
formatted sheet music
piano composers
write multi-voice piano textures
print-ready piano score
Show 2 more scenarios
ensemble leaders and teachers
combine lyrics and rehearsal markings
readable instructional scores
Assemble lesson and rehearsal materials with articulations, dynamics, lyrics, and playback review.
contemporary arrangers
build percussion and chord arrangements
specialized arrangement score
Use percussion staff definitions, chord symbols, and tablature to represent rhythm and harmony accurately.
Best for: Fits when composers need engraving-focused editing with repeatable PDF outputs and reliable MusicXML exchange.
Overture
vertical specialistNotation and sequencer hybrid software from Sonic Scores with VST playback support.
Repeatable score export pipeline that produces publication-ready SVG and PDF outputs from a single workspace workflow.
Overture from sonicscores.com targets composers who need tight control of notation output while working from a score-first workflow. It focuses on importing MIDI or MusicXML, refining engraving-ready layout, and exporting vector-ready page output such as SVG and PDF score files.
- +MusicXML and MIDI import paths support score reconstruction workflows
- +Vector-first export outputs help with typography control in downstream tools
- +Part extraction and score-to-part views reduce manual reformatting
- +Rehearsal mark and lyric alignment tools support consistent publication formatting
- –API and automation surface for custom pipelines is limited
- –Advanced engraver-level controls can require careful layout iterations
music educators and students
teach with notation plus playback
lesson-ready scores
composers and production teams
move projects using MusicXML and MIDI
reusable project data
Show 2 more scenarios
copyists and small music teams
extract parts and prepare rehearsal pages
consistent part pages
Apply layout settings, extract parts, and prepare consistent score and part pages for rehearsal use.
transcription users
convert MIDI performance to notation
readable notation from MIDI
Bring MIDI performances or sketches into the notation workflow and refine the engraving into readable pages.
Best for: Fits when composers need reliable import-to-print formatting for arrangement and rapid revision cycles.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 print music software, Crescendo stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Print Music Software
This buyer’s guide covers print music software used by composers and arrangers across desktop notation editors and production-oriented score workflow tools. The lineup includes Crescendo, Sibelius, MuseScore, Dorico, Noteflight, Flat, ScoreCloud, capella, Encore, and Overture.
Each tool review focuses on concrete engraving and output behavior, plus the mechanics that matter for repeatable printing. Dorico, Sibelius, and MuseScore anchor multiple decision paths because they represent different approaches to engraving consistency, part extraction workflows, and export-ready output.
Print Music Software for Engraving, Part Extraction, and Output Control
Print music software is a notation editor plus an engraving engine that converts musical input into consistent score layout for PDF score output, SVG rendering, and vector export for reuse in downstream layout workflows. It also manages common transformation workflows like MusicXML import, transposition, and part extraction so revisions keep typography and spacing relationships intact.
Crescendo targets print-first layout control with vector export suitable for reuse in layout tools, while Sibelius emphasizes time-saving engraving consistency that preserves spacing relationships as layouts and parts change. MuseScore adds PDF and SVG export directly from the notation workspace with MusicXML exchange for cross-tool interchange, which changes the main evaluation focus toward fast output and interchange rather than editor governance.
Print-output controls, export formats, and revision behavior
Print music software earns its place when score revisions keep spacing relationships intact and when exported pages stay publication-ready for PDF score output and downstream typography work. These features decide whether a project needs manual re-layout after input changes.
Vector export for typography reuse
Crescendo supports vector export for notation pages so rehearsal and prep documents can be scaled and reused in layout tools without quality loss. Overture also emphasizes SVG and PDF export from a single workspace pipeline for typography control in downstream tools.
Engraving consistency during iterative revisions
Sibelius focuses on time-saving engraving consistency that preserves spacing relationships as layouts and parts change. capella keeps engraving changes from resetting the entire layout so repeatable PDF outputs and stable formatting survive editing.
Part extraction and transposition consistency
Dorico uses an engraver-grade formatting approach that maintains consistent score layout and spacing across complex passages while updating transposition and extracted parts together. Encore targets reliable page layout control across multi-part scores so imported structures can be edited and printed with predictable formatting.
Exporting from the notation workspace for fast turnaround
MuseScore exports PDF and SVG directly from the notation workspace with engraving-focused pagination. Flat and Noteflight both keep work browser-local, with Flat tying revision history to ongoing edits and Noteflight enabling in-browser composing with review-driven workflows.
Interchange paths for score reconstruction workflows
MuseScore provides MusicXML import and export for cross-tool score interchange so small workflows can move scores between tools quickly. Overture adds MusicXML and MIDI import paths to rebuild scores before export, while Dorico also preserves many structures during MusicXML migration.
Production workflow configuration for repeatable exports
ScoreCloud is configured for production workflows that convert managed musical inputs into repeatable publishing exports with consistent formatting behavior. Crescendo still leads on vector-ready print output, but it shows limited automation and API surface for studio-scale pipelines.
Choose by revision behavior, export format needs, and workflow automation depth
Print output projects fail when edits trigger layout drift, when exported assets do not fit the downstream toolchain, or when part generation requires manual rework. The steps below separate tools by how they behave under change and how they fit into production pipelines.
Start with the downstream layout format requirement
If vector reuse in layout tools matters, Crescendo’s vector export for notation pages and Overture’s SVG and PDF export target downstream typography control. If the workflow prioritizes quick print-ready output directly from the editor workspace, MuseScore exports PDF and SVG with engraving-focused pagination.
Select for revision stability or revision speed
If the priority is engraving consistency that preserves spacing relationships as layouts and parts change, Sibelius is oriented toward iterative revision cycles. If the priority is keeping engraving changes from resetting the entire layout, capella targets revision-focused score management during edits.
Pick the workflow model that matches how scores are produced
If parts and transposition updates must stay aligned through the extraction workflow, Dorico’s engraver-grade formatting controls keep score layout and spacing consistent while updating transposition and extracted parts together. If the goal is controlled publishing exports from managed inputs, ScoreCloud focuses on configurable production workflows for repeatable publishing exports.
Decide how much manual cleanup is acceptable after import
If MusicXML imports often need structure reconstruction, MuseScore’s MusicXML interchange is designed for cross-tool exchange rather than bespoke cleanup. If manual cleanup is acceptable and browser-based drafting matters, Noteflight can work, but import can require manual cleanup for complex layout and engraving.
Choose the collaboration and revision trace expectations
If collaborative review in the same document is the focus, Noteflight supports sharing and browser-based collaboration for review with musicians. If revision trace is tied directly to ongoing browser editing sessions, Flat emphasizes revision history inside the editing experience.
Confirm whether automation needs exceed built-in tooling
For studio-scale pipelines that require custom automation and integration beyond built-in editor tooling, Crescendo’s automation and API surface are limited. If integration depth is secondary and the priority is repeatable formatting for printing, tools like Encore and ScoreCloud focus on predictable exports rather than extensibility.
Who should use each Print Music Software approach
Print music software selection hinges on the publishing workflow, not just notation capability. The best fit depends on whether projects are revised frequently, exported into vector-first production tools, or managed as repeatable publishing runs.
Arrangers who need reliable sheet output and vector-ready rehearsal documents
Crescendo supports vector export for notation pages so rehearsal and prep documents can be scaled and reused without quality loss, and it adds print-first layout controls for consistent page formatting.
Editors and orchestration teams running frequent layout and part revisions
Sibelius preserves spacing relationships as layouts and parts change so iterative revisions keep engraving consistency across dense scores and multi-part layouts.
Composers focused on fast interchange and quick export from the notation workspace
MuseScore enables PDF and SVG export directly from the notation workspace and includes MusicXML import and export for cross-tool interchange.
Composers and publishers needing engraver-grade control across transposition and extracted parts
Dorico maintains consistent score layout and spacing while updating transposition and extracted parts together, which reduces layout drift during multi-instrument revisions.
Editorial teams that must generate repeatable publishing exports from managed inputs
ScoreCloud configures production workflows to convert managed musical inputs into repeatable publishing exports with consistent formatting behavior and fewer manual layout steps.
Common print workflow mistakes that waste revision time
Print workflows fail when the chosen tool cannot preserve formatting under the exact kind of change the project performs most often. The mistakes below target the highest-cost friction points in real engraving and export work.
Choosing a tool for editor entry speed while ignoring revision-driven engraving drift
Sibelius is built around engraving consistency that preserves spacing relationships as layouts and parts change. capella is built around revision-focused score management so engraving changes do not reset the entire layout.
Assuming all tools produce vector assets suitable for downstream layout scaling
Crescendo’s vector export for notation pages supports reuse in layout tools without quality loss. Overture provides SVG and PDF export designed for downstream typography control.
Underestimating import cleanup needs for complex MusicXML layout and engraving structures
Noteflight can require manual cleanup for complex layout and engraving after import. MuseScore targets MusicXML interchange with PDF and SVG output from the notation workspace, which reduces reconstruction friction for cross-tool exchange.
Treating part extraction and transposition updates as generic edit operations rather than layout-coupled behavior
Dorico links formatting consistency to transposition and extracted parts so spacing relationships remain consistent across complex passages. Encore focuses on repeatable page-layout tuning for printing output so imported structures transfer into edit-ready scores with dependable layout control.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Crescendo, Sibelius, MuseScore, Dorico, Noteflight, Flat, ScoreCloud, capella, Encore, and Overture by prioritizing print-focused engraving output behavior, export formatting, and revision stability. Features carried 40% weight because print-ready PDF score output and SVG rendering need predictable engraving results across revisions.
Ease and value each carried 30% weight because studio workflows still depend on fast input iteration and manageable friction when moving between tools. Crescendo ranked first because its vector export for notation pages supports reuse in layout tools without quality loss while its print-first layout controls keep page formatting consistent across rehearsal and prep documents.
Frequently Asked Questions About Print Music Software
How does Dorico handle transposition and part extraction without redoing layout?
What tradeoffs appear when choosing MuseScore for MusicXML exchange versus Dorico or Sibelius?
Which tool produces vector-ready page output with minimal quality loss for layout tools?
How should MuseScore and Sibelius be compared for fast revision cycles on concert-ready scores?
When does Overture’s import-to-print pipeline help more than editor-first drafting?
What breaks if a score relies on complex engraving behaviors during MusicXML interchange?
How do browser-based tools like Noteflight and Flat handle collaboration and revision history?
Which product is better suited for managed, integration-first score production workflows?
How does capella manage revision cycles so engraving changes do not reset the entire layout?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Funding and competing interests
This study was co-funded by several of the vendors assessed in it. No single vendor funded it. Funders could propose the market studied.
They had no role in selecting vendors, setting or weighting criteria, analysing data or drawing conclusions, and they received the same factual-accuracy check as every other vendor assessed.
Market definition, inclusion rules and criteria weights were fixed by an editor before research began and did not change afterwards. Editorial process →
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Music And Audio alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of music and audio tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare music and audio tools→