
GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Utilities PowerTop 10 Best Power Grid Software of 2026
Ranking roundup of power grid software for utilities and operators, comparing OSISoft PI System, Siemens and GE automation, plus MATPOWER and CYME.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
MATPOWER is the strongest pick for engineering teams that need repeatable offline power-flow, OPF, and contingency studies from controlled network cases, whereas RTDS Simulator fits best when you must validate controllers and protection in time-synchronized closed-loop hardware-in-the-loop runs.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
MATPOWER
MATPOWER case structures let scripts transform identical network data across contingencies for consistent comparisons.
Built for fits when engineering teams need repeatable offline power-flow and contingency studies from controlled network cases..
RTDS Simulator
Editor pickDeterministic real-time simulation execution enables stable closed-loop testing with external devices and instrumentation.
Built for fits when controller and protection validation needs time-synchronized closed-loop simulation runs..
CYME
Editor pickScenario-driven batch execution that regenerates distribution study outputs from configured network models.
Built for fits when distribution planning teams need scenario automation and consistent feeder studies..
Comparison Table
MATPOWER
API-firstMATPOWER is a MATLAB-based package for power flow, optimal power flow, and network optimization.
MATPOWER case structures let scripts transform identical network data across contingencies for consistent comparisons.
MATPOWER is built around explicit network data structures such as bus, generator, and branch tables, which makes study setup transparent for analysts and script automation. The simulation suite covers core steady-state workflows like power flow and contingency analysis, plus follow-on computations commonly used for operational studies. Case files and MATLAB scripting enable repeatable runs across many scenarios with identical model semantics.
A tradeoff is that MATPOWER focuses on steady-state analysis rather than real-time control system integration, so it does not replace an EMS or distribution automation stack. It fits when a team needs offline what-if studies, reliability checks, or topology-level experiments from a controlled dataset and can manage model preprocessing outside the tool.
- +Script-driven studies with deterministic inputs across many scenarios
- +Clear bus generator branch data model for fast case editing
- +Well-scoped power flow and contingency workflows for engineering analysis
- +Batch execution supports parameter sweeps without UI overhead
- –Steady-state studies only, so real-time operator workflows need other systems
- –Requires MATLAB proficiency for deeper customization
Power system engineers
Contingency analysis on benchmark grids
Repeatable what-if results
Operations planning teams
Study generation dispatch changes
Faster planning iterations
Show 1 more scenario
Grid model integrators
Transform internal models to cases
Consistent analysis inputs
Map external network representations into MATPOWER bus generator branch formats for standardized studies.
Best for: Fits when engineering teams need repeatable offline power-flow and contingency studies from controlled network cases.
RTDS Simulator
vertical specialistRTDS Simulator performs real-time digital power system simulation for hardware-in-the-loop testing.
Deterministic real-time simulation execution enables stable closed-loop testing with external devices and instrumentation.
RTDS Simulator targets engineering teams that need repeatable transient studies and closed-loop controller testing with strict timing. It supports model execution that can couple to external devices through simulation I/O links, and it can stream measurement signals outward for monitoring or automated evaluations. Automation is driven by scenario setup workflows that keep runs consistent across test campaigns. Governance is typically achieved through controlled project files and versioned scenario definitions rather than centralized UI administration.
A tradeoff is that RTDS Simulator workflows are model and infrastructure heavy, so quick “what-if” studies often take longer to prepare than in lightweight simulators. It fits best when controller behavior must be validated under synchronized inputs, or when hardware prototypes need to be exercised without putting field assets at risk. Teams also benefit when they already have external test harnesses that can consume time-synchronized measurement streams.
- +Deterministic real-time execution supports repeatable controller validation
- +Hardware-in-the-loop friendly I/O design reduces coupling ambiguity
- +Scenario-based runs keep transient test campaigns consistent
- +Works well for closed-loop testing with external measurement consumers
- –Model build and wiring workload is high for ad hoc studies
- –External integration depends on lab-grade test harness maturity
Transmission protection engineers
Validate relay settings under transients
Fewer commissioning iterations
DER integration test teams
Test inverter controls in closed loop
More reliable ride-through behavior
Show 2 more scenarios
Grid automation developers
Regression-test control logic changes
Lower regression risk
Re-run scripted scenarios and compare expected measurement patterns across software releases.
Power systems R&D labs
Prototype new control strategies safely
Faster prototype validation
Exercise new control concepts with deterministic dynamics and external observation tooling.
Best for: Fits when controller and protection validation needs time-synchronized closed-loop simulation runs.
CYME
enterpriseCYME provides distribution, transmission, substation, and network planning analysis software.
Scenario-driven batch execution that regenerates distribution study outputs from configured network models.
CYME centers on distribution network studies, where models, configurations, and study settings drive repeatable analysis runs. Study outputs are generated from configured network data and engineering assumptions, which supports scenario comparisons across multiple planning cycles. The automation surface is primarily study parameterization and model execution workflows, not a general-purpose analytics stack.
A key tradeoff is that setup requires disciplined model quality so that downstream results reflect the engineering intent. CYME fits teams running frequent planning scenarios and needing consistent results across feeders, voltage levels, and switch configurations. It is less aligned to edge-side control, low-latency telemetry processing, or real-time dispatch automation without an external control system.
- +Distribution network studies stay repeatable through scenario-driven configuration
- +Engineering outputs align with planning workflows and feeder-level analysis
- +Model execution supports batch study runs for multiple cases
- +Extensibility via vendor engineering model integrations
- –Model build quality strongly determines study accuracy outcomes
- –Automation focuses on study runs, not real-time control orchestration
- –Integration effort can be high when data sources differ from engineering schemas
- –Advanced governance needs extra process controls around model changes
Distribution planning engineers
Run recurring feeder scenario studies
Faster, repeatable planning studies
Asset management teams
Validate capacity and reinforcements
Clear reinforcement decisions
Show 2 more scenarios
Program managers for upgrades
Standardize study deliverables
Comparable project deliverables
Use controlled configuration to produce consistent outputs across projects and engineering groups.
System operations engineering
Support switching plan analysis
Reduced study rework
Evaluate switching arrangements and engineering constraints to support planned operational changes.
Best for: Fits when distribution planning teams need scenario automation and consistent feeder studies.
ETAP
enterpriseETAP provides electrical power system modeling, analysis, protection, and operational management software.
Protection coordination studies tied directly to the same modeled electrical network, with relay setting outputs generated from study inputs.
ETAP is a power grid software suite focused on electrical design, studies, and modeling workflows for transmission and distribution systems. Its workflow centers on electrical one-line modeling that supports load flow, short-circuit, protection coordination, and power quality studies within the same project data set.
ETAP also includes tools for voltage regulation and reactive power analysis, which reduces the need to translate results between separate study environments. Integration is typically project-centric through import and export formats plus automation hooks, rather than grid-wide control center connectivity.
- +Unified electrical model supports load flow, short-circuit, and protection studies.
- +Protection coordination and relay settings analysis use the same topology inputs.
- +Power system studies run from a consistent one-line data workflow.
- +Scenario-based studies reduce rework when configurations change.
- –Automation depends on ETAP-specific scripting and import-export workflows.
- –Grid control data exchange needs external integration work for SCADA-style telemetry.
- –Large network performance depends heavily on model granularity choices.
- –Governance features like fine-grained RBAC and audit trails are not the primary strength.
Best for: Fits when engineers need an on-prem electrical study model that drives multiple analysis types from one topology.
PowerWorld Simulator
enterprisePowerWorld Simulator analyzes transmission systems through interactive power flow and stability studies.
High-speed what-if studies with operator-style visualization and direct, stepwise network event replay.
PowerWorld Simulator performs interactive power flow and transient stability studies using a detailed network model that can be stepped through system events. It includes workflow-driven tools for contingency analysis, voltage control behavior, and operator-style what-if analysis tied to configurable study cases.
PowerWorld also supports automation through scripting and project file organization, which helps repeat analysis runs across different scenarios. The product is frequently used for training replicas of grid operations and for engineering study work where fast iteration matters.
- +Fast, interactive power flow and event stepping for study iteration
- +Scenario and case management supports repeatable contingency workflows
- +Scripting automates scenario creation and batch study execution
- +Rich visualization for topology edits and results interpretation
- –Integration with control center telemetry stacks can require custom bridging
- –Advanced enterprise governance features like granular RBAC are limited
- –Model quality depends on manual data preparation for detailed cases
- –Large study throughput can be constrained by single-machine workflows
Best for: Fits when engineering teams need interactive power system analysis with repeatable scenario workflows.
PSCAD
vertical specialistPSCAD provides electromagnetic transient simulation for power networks and power electronics.
Electromagnetic transient simulation capability for detailed grid and converter interactions using project-defined networks and controls.
PSCAD is a grid and power-electronics simulation environment used to model electromagnetic transients and detailed device behavior for offline studies. It supports time-domain study workflows that generate high-resolution waveforms, which teams use to test protection settings, converter controls, grounding choices, and grid interfaces.
The typical workflow centers on project builds that define components, signals, and solver settings, and it outputs data for engineering analysis rather than running control-center operations. PSCAD is distinct in its focus on simulation fidelity and scenario repeatability for engineering teams.
- +High-fidelity electromagnetic transient modeling with detailed component and control behavior
- +Repeatable project-based scenarios that support regression-style simulation runs
- +Built-in waveform outputs that reduce custom scripting for common analyses
- +Strong fit for protection, grounding, and converter interface testing workflows
- –Workflow centers on offline simulation rather than real-time grid operations
- –Large models need careful solver and step-size configuration to avoid performance issues
- –Integration requires engineering work when linking to external SCADA or EMS data paths
- –Model development can be time-consuming for organizations without transient-simulation expertise
Best for: Fits when engineering teams need electromagnetic transient studies with repeatable models and waveform-level validation.
ePHASORSIM
vertical specialistePHASORSIM provides real-time phasor-domain simulation for power grids and control systems.
PMU-like synchronized measurement stream generation designed for repeatable replay into external validation workflows.
ePHASORSIM from opal-rt.com focuses on power-system simulation and synchrophasor-focused workflows for engineering teams. It is built around repeatable scenarios that generate time-aligned measurement streams for validation and operator training.
Core capabilities concentrate on scenario configuration, model-based event generation, and export of simulated signals for downstream integration. The practical differentiator is that the workflow is oriented around producing PMU-like data products rather than only running study cases.
- +Scenario-driven generation of synchronized PMU-style measurement streams
- +Engineering workflow fit for validation against control center expectations
- +Consistent replay structure for comparing runs across configuration changes
- +Export-oriented outputs for feeding external visualization and analysis tools
- –Integration depth depends on matching measurement and timestamp conventions
- –Strong simulation workflow, with limited coverage of grid-model authoring
Best for: Fits when utilities need repeatable PMU-style signal simulation for training and validation pipelines.
DIgSILENT PowerFactory
enterprisePowerFactory supports transmission, distribution, generation, protection, and renewable integration studies.
Tight coupling of study engines with shared network objects enables consistent protection-aware and operational scenario results.
DIgSILENT PowerFactory is a power system modeling and analysis tool used for engineering workflows such as power flow, short-circuit, and stability studies. It differentiates itself with a tightly integrated study environment that keeps network topology, device parameters, and results consistent across analyses.
Model creation, study execution, and result handling support detailed transmission and distribution cases, including scenarios that involve protection settings and operational constraints. Automation and extensibility are strongest through configuration scripts and APIs that fit engineering handoffs between teams.
- +One workspace keeps network data consistent across power flow, short-circuit, and stability studies
- +Strong device library and parameter handling for detailed grid representations
- +Automation paths support repeatable studies without manual reconfiguration each run
- +Protection-oriented modeling supports setting validation inside broader studies
- –Advanced setup demands disciplined data governance across study cases
- –Large models can slow iteration when workflows require frequent recalculation
- –Some integrations require custom bridging to control center systems and historians
- –UI-driven workflows can be slower than script-first approaches for high-throughput runs
Best for: Fits when grid engineers need high-fidelity studies and repeatable scenario automation across large models.
Schneider Electric EcoStruxure ADMS
enterpriseEcoStruxure ADMS combines distribution management, outage management, and supervisory control functions.
Model-driven distribution control workflow customization that ties automation logic to operational grid objects and administrative governance.
Schneider Electric EcoStruxure ADMS runs distribution and transmission network control workflows that support switching, voltage regulation, and operational planning at the control center and substation interface layers. EcoStruxure ADMS focuses on model-driven grid operations and integrates with utility control systems through standard communications and existing enterprise systems.
The system is designed for automation and extensibility around field data ingestion, topology processing inputs, and operator-driven decision workflows. It also supports administrative controls for multi-team operation, with governance needed to manage roles, configuration changes, and change traceability across deployments.
- +Model-driven ADMS workflows reduce manual operator data entry overhead
- +Integration focus on utility control ecosystems supports existing SCADA and enterprise tooling
- +Extensibility supports tailored automation logic tied to grid operational objects
- +Operational governance features support role separation and configuration change tracking
- –Initial configuration effort is high for topology inputs, limits, and automation rules
- –Higher-level analytics like contingency and power-flow studies are not the core ADMS center
- –API surface is more integration-oriented than developer-first for custom real-time controls
Best for: Fits when utilities need ADMS automation built on a governed operational model and control-center integration.
OpenDSS
API-firstOpenDSS is an open-source distribution system simulator maintained through the EPRI ecosystem.
Control and device behavior is driven by OpenDSS script logic, enabling deterministic rule execution inside time-series runs.
OpenDSS is a distribution power system simulation engine used to model feeders, control devices, and electrical states through text-based scripts and model files. Its core capabilities focus on power flow and time-series studies, including control actions, load shapes, regulator and capacitor behaviors, and contingency-style scenario runs.
Automation comes from script execution workflows that can be integrated into batch pipelines, parameter sweeps, and repeatable study templates. OpenDSS is distinct in how it couples deterministic circuit definitions with a programmatic execution model that supports reproducible experiments without a separate graphical control-center stack.
- +Scriptable feeder models enable repeatable studies and scenario sweeps
- +Time-series simulations support load shapes and control actions over study horizons
- +Consistent per-unit device models cover regulators, capacitors, and line codes
- +Clear separation between circuit definitions and execution supports pipeline automation
- –Graphical workflows are limited compared with SCADA and DMS user interfaces
- –Requires disciplined model management for large multi-feeder portfolios
- –API-based integration depends on external orchestration rather than native service endpoints
- –Built-in reporting is study-centric and needs customization for operational dashboards
Best for: Fits when teams need high-throughput distribution simulation and reproducible study automation for planning and operational analytics.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 utilities power, MATPOWER stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right power grid software
Power grid software in this guide covers the engineering and operations workflows behind power flow, contingency studies, protection coordination, and distribution automation. The lineup includes MATPOWER, RTDS Simulator, CYME, ETAP, PowerWorld Simulator, PSCAD, ePHASORSIM, DIgSILENT PowerFactory, Schneider Electric EcoStruxure ADMS, and OpenDSS.
The comparison centers on how each tool represents network cases, runs repeatable scenarios, and supports automation through scripts or configured study logic. MATPOWER case structures target deterministic offline power-flow and contingency studies, while RTDS Simulator focuses on deterministic real-time simulation for closed-loop validation.
Power grid software for repeatable network studies, simulation execution, and distribution automation
Power grid software uses modeled electrical assets and operational constraints to execute studies across steady-state and time-domain workloads. MATPOWER supports script-driven steady-state case sweeps so engineering teams can transform identical network data across contingencies for consistent comparisons.
In distribution-focused workflows, CYME runs scenario-driven batch execution that regenerates distribution study outputs from configured network models. OpenDSS uses script logic to drive deterministic feeder behavior inside time-series simulations, including load shapes and control actions over study horizons.
Power grid software features that determine repeatability and study throughput
High-throughput study automation also depends on whether a tool drives time-series behavior from scripts or from integrated model objects. OpenDSS runs device and control behavior from script logic inside time-series simulations, while CYME regenerates distribution outputs from scenario-driven configuration.
Deterministic scenario execution for steady-state and contingency workflows
MATPOWER uses deterministic script-driven studies with repeatable inputs across many scenarios. PowerWorld Simulator adds fast interactive power flow and stepwise event replay for scenario iteration without changing case logic.
Closed-loop real-time simulation for controller and protection validation
RTDS Simulator delivers deterministic real-time execution for stable closed-loop testing with external devices and instrumentation. PSCAD provides electromagnetic transient modeling for waveform-level validation using project-defined networks and controls.
Distribution automation with batch scenario regeneration and time-series controls
CYME runs scenario-driven batch execution that regenerates distribution study outputs from configured network models. OpenDSS ties feeder behavior to script logic so time-series runs can apply load shapes and control actions over the study horizon.
Protection coordination tied to a shared electrical network model
ETAP generates relay settings analysis from study inputs using the same modeled electrical network for load flow, short-circuit, and protection coordination. DIgSILENT PowerFactory keeps one workspace with shared network objects so power flow, short-circuit, and stability results stay consistent across operational scenarios.
Synchronized measurement stream generation for validation and training
ePHASORSIM produces PMU-like synchronized measurement stream generation designed for repeatable replay into external validation pipelines. MATPOWER stays focused on steady-state studies, so measurement-stream replay workflows depend on additional systems outside its case execution.
Governed operational model customization for ADMS-style distribution control logic
Schneider Electric EcoStruxure ADMS emphasizes model-driven distribution control workflow customization tied to operational grid objects and administrative governance. ETAP centers on electrical analysis and relay setting outputs, so ADMS automation and operational governance require external integration for SCADA-style telemetry.
Choose based on execution model, scenario automation needs, and validation depth
Next, decide whether automation should be scenario regeneration from configuration, event replay for operator-style iteration, or protection-aware analysis from a shared network model. CYME regenerates distribution study outputs from scenario-driven configuration, and ETAP binds protection coordination and relay setting outputs to one electrical network topology.
Pick the simulation time model that matches validation targets
Select RTDS Simulator when validation requires deterministic real-time closed-loop execution with external devices and instrumentation. Select PSCAD when validation requires electromagnetic transient fidelity with waveform-level control behavior in project-defined models.
Choose scenario execution that supports how cases are managed
Choose MATPOWER when repeatability depends on script-driven transformations over identical network data across contingencies for consistent comparisons. Choose CYME when distribution studies must regenerate feeder outputs through scenario-driven batch execution tied to configured network models.
Decide between operator-style event stepping or automated time-series control logic
Choose PowerWorld Simulator when engineers need high-speed interactive what-if studies with direct stepwise network event replay for rapid iteration. Choose OpenDSS when high-throughput distribution simulation must run deterministic rule execution driven by OpenDSS script logic inside time-series runs.
Match the protection workflow to the analysis engine ownership
Choose ETAP when protection coordination and relay setting outputs must come from the same modeled electrical network that also runs load flow and short-circuit studies. Choose DIgSILENT PowerFactory when one workspace must keep network objects consistent across multiple study types while supporting repeatable scenario automation.
Plan measurement replay and timestamp conventions before committing
Choose ePHASORSIM when repeatable PMU-like synchronized measurement stream generation must feed external validation pipelines. Use DIgSILENT PowerFactory or ETAP when the primary requirement is study computation from electrical topology and device parameters rather than measurement-stream simulation.
Ensure ADMS-style operational governance is achievable inside the same tool chain
Choose EcoStruxure ADMS when distribution control logic customization must tie automation rules to operational grid objects with administrative governance. If the main goal is contingency or power-flow analysis tied to electrical topology, pick ETAP or MATPOWER and integrate operational control separately.
Who these power grid software tools fit best
Distribution automation and control-oriented workflows fit teams that run scenario sweeps and time-series control actions tied to feeder assets. Protection coordination tools fit teams that need relay setting outputs derived directly from the same topology used for electrical studies.
Engineering teams running offline contingency and comparison studies
MATPOWER supports deterministic steady-state case sweeps where scripts transform identical network data across contingencies for consistent comparisons.
Controller, protection, and lab validation teams needing hardware-in-the-loop testing
RTDS Simulator enables deterministic real-time execution with external devices and instrumentation to support closed-loop validation.
Distribution planning teams generating feeder studies at scale
CYME runs scenario-driven batch execution that regenerates distribution study outputs from configured network models for consistent feeder-level analysis.
Utilities that need time-series feeder behavior from deterministic device and control scripts
OpenDSS drives control and device behavior from OpenDSS script logic inside time-series simulations that include load shapes and control actions.
Teams integrating protection coordination and relay setting generation into one modeled network workflow
ETAP generates protection coordination and relay settings outputs from the same topology used for load flow and short-circuit studies.
Common power grid software buying mistakes that break repeatability or integration
Several tools are built around tightly scoped workflows, so trying to use one engine for every analysis type can create manual bridging or additional governance work. The guidance below targets mistakes visible in how these tools execute scenarios, generate outputs, and integrate with external tooling.
Selecting a steady-state or offline workflow tool for real-time operator validation.
MATPOWER focuses on steady-state studies, so real-time operator workflows need other systems for closed-loop execution.
Underestimating model build and wiring effort for deterministic real-time simulations.
RTDS Simulator supports deterministic real-time controller validation, but model build and wiring workload is high for ad hoc studies.
Assuming scenario automation covers control orchestration for live operations.
CYME automates study runs through scenario-driven configuration, but automation focuses on study outputs rather than real-time control orchestration.
Treating protection and electrical analysis as separate data pipelines when relay settings must be derived from one topology.
ETAP ties protection coordination and relay setting outputs to the same modeled electrical network, so splitting topology sources can break traceability.
Planning governance and model management too late for large multi-feeder portfolios.
OpenDSS requires disciplined model management for large multi-feeder portfolios, and graphical workflows are limited versus SCADA-style DMS user interfaces.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated MATPOWER, RTDS Simulator, CYME, ETAP, PowerWorld Simulator, PSCAD, ePHASORSIM, DIgSILENT PowerFactory, EcoStruxure ADMS, and OpenDSS by comparing features at 40% weight, ease at 30% weight, and value at 30% weight. MATPOWER set the top position because its case structures support script-driven transformations over identical network data across contingencies for consistent comparisons.
RTDS Simulator ranked highly in closed-loop validation workflows because deterministic real-time execution supports repeatable controller validation with external devices and instrumentation. CYME and OpenDSS scored well for scenario automation because CYME regenerates distribution study outputs through scenario-driven batch execution and OpenDSS runs deterministic feeder behavior via script logic inside time-series simulations.
Frequently Asked Questions About power grid software
How should teams choose between MATPOWER and DIgSILENT PowerFactory for repeatable studies?
Which tool fits hardware-in-the-loop controller validation with deterministic timing?
What breaks if distribution studies require scenario automation from configuration-driven models rather than interactive workflows?
When do electrical one-line and protection coordination workflows point to ETAP instead of OpenDSS?
How can PowerWorld Simulator and PSCAD be used together without losing waveform fidelity?
How do synchrophasor training pipelines differ between ePHASORSIM and general power flow tools?
Which platform best supports PMU-like measurement exports into downstream validation systems?
What admin governance and audit needs show up when running Schneider Electric EcoStruxure ADMS in multi-team operations?
How do data migration and model consistency concerns differ between DIgSILENT PowerFactory and OSIsoft PI System-style time-series integration?
Where does OpenDSS automation break down compared with script automation in MATPOWER or CYME?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
- Utilities PowerTop 10 Best Smart Grids Software of 2026
- Data Science AnalyticsTop 10 Best Grid Simulation Software of 2026
- Utilities PowerTop 10 Best Optimal Power Flow Software of 2026
- Utilities PowerTop 10 Best Power Systems Services of 2026
- Environment EnergyTop 10 Best Power System Consulting Services of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Utilities Power alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of utilities power tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare utilities power tools→