GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Art DesignTop 10 Best Photo Edition Software of 2026
Top 10 photo edition software rankings for photographers, with side-by-side workflow comparisons of Luminar Neo, Capture One, and ON1 Photo RAW.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Luminar Neo is the best fit for photographers who want fast, repeatable RAW edits and consistent batch exports with localized masks, whereas Capture One is the better choice for studio teams that need color-critical RAW work with tethered capture and repeatable studio output.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Luminar Neo
Guided AI tools that target sky, subject, and structure edits while keeping edits adjustable.
Built for fits when photographers need fast, repeatable RAW edits with localized masks and consistent batch exports..
Capture One
Editor pickTethered capture with session control keeps live selection and adjustment settings synchronized during shooting.
Built for fits when studio teams need repeatable color-critical RAW edits with tethered capture and batch exports..
ON1 Photo RAW
Editor pickLayer-based editing inside the RAW development environment, so masking and adjustments stay non-destructive end to end.
Built for fits when photographers need cataloging, RAW development, and retouching without switching tools..
Comparison Table
Luminar Neo
SMBPhoto editing software that combines layer tools, presets, and AI-driven adjustments.
Guided AI tools that target sky, subject, and structure edits while keeping edits adjustable.
Luminar Neo keeps editing changes non-destructive and maintains room for re-tuning exposure, color, and detail after initial adjustments. Localized masking supports brush and gradient selections, and its effect stack lets users combine edits without managing complex layer structures. RAW pipeline controls include demosaicing-stage tone and color adjustments, plus metadata-preserving exports for downstream tools. Batch processing can apply consistent settings across sets, which reduces per-image tweaking time for recurring scenes.
A clear tradeoff is limited layer-based compositing depth compared with editor ecosystems that rely on manual layer graphs and blend modes. Luminar Neo fits best when a workflow needs quick look creation, fast subject cleanup, and repeatable export settings for batches like events or product sets.
- +Effect stack workflow speeds creative iterations without manual layer management
- +Localized masking tools support brush and gradient refinements
- +Batch processing applies consistent edits across image sets
- +Non-destructive editing preserves original RAW files
- –Layer-based compositing depth is thinner than Photoshop-style workflows
- –Advanced color workflows need more external steps for strict print pipelines
Event photographers
Batch brightening and face-safe cleanup
Faster curation and delivery
Product photographers
Repeatable background and color grading
More consistent catalog images
Show 2 more scenarios
Small studios
RAW look creation for mixed lighting
Fewer re-edits per shoot
Build a reusable creative look, then adjust per image for highlights, color, and detail.
Retouchers
Quick cleanup before advanced finishing
Less time on initial cleanup
Run targeted edits first, then pass exports into specialized tools for deeper compositing.
Best for: Fits when photographers need fast, repeatable RAW edits with localized masks and consistent batch exports.
Capture One
enterpriseProfessional photo editing and tethering software built for raw files, color control, and studio workflows.
Tethered capture with session control keeps live selection and adjustment settings synchronized during shooting.
Capture One targets production workflows where RAW handling, session organization, and consistent color behavior matter from import to export. Tethered capture workflows integrate live view control and session management, which reduces handoffs during studio sessions.
The main tradeoff is that Capture One centers on its own catalog and session workflow, so photographers who expect Photoshop-style layer compositing for heavy graphics work may reach limits. It fits best for color-critical jobs that need repeatable variants and fast iteration, such as portrait sets delivered with controlled skin tones.
- +Session and tethered workflows reduce capture-to-select friction
- +Color management workflows support predictable profile-based output
- +Fast batch exports keep naming and settings consistent
- +Local adjustment tools feel precise for retouching inside RAW
- –Layer-centric compositing matches Photoshop less closely
- –Session-based organization requires team process alignment
Portrait studios
Tethered sessions with rapid approvals
Faster client approvals
Wedding photographers
Consistent skin-tone variants at scale
Less per-image tweaking
Show 1 more scenario
Product photo teams
Batch exports for catalogs
Cleaner production throughput
Batch processing and repeatable adjustments reduce variance between similar product shots.
Best for: Fits when studio teams need repeatable color-critical RAW edits with tethered capture and batch exports.
ON1 Photo RAW
SMBPhoto editing software with raw processing, effects, masking, and catalog features in one package.
Layer-based editing inside the RAW development environment, so masking and adjustments stay non-destructive end to end.
ON1 Photo RAW covers the end-to-end loop of ingest, develop, retouch, and export inside one catalog. It keeps edits non-destructive and uses layered adjustments plus localized masks, which makes changes easy to revisit after multiple passes. The library tools support sidecar metadata workflows and preserve common capture metadata through the editing pipeline. Batch processing supports repeatable exports with preset control, which helps when large event sets need consistent naming and output settings.
A key tradeoff is that ON1 Photo RAW’s catalog and editing experience can feel heavier than dedicated DAM tools or single-purpose RAW developers, especially on large libraries with many previews. It fits best when a photographer needs both retouching and RAW development in the same session, such as correcting exposure and then doing detailed subject cleanup before export. It also works well when teams or freelancers deliver edited subsets with consistent styles, because saved adjustments travel through the batch workflow.
- +Layer-based retouching plus parametric RAW controls in one editor
- +Catalog workflow that keeps edits organized across shooting sessions
- +Batch export with saved adjustment setups for repeatable delivery
- +Localized masking for targeted edits without flattening the stack
- –Catalog and preview operations can slow down on very large libraries
- –Some advanced color management workflows need extra manual attention
Event photographers
Batch deliver consistent edited galleries
Faster gallery turnaround
Freelance portrait retouchers
Refine subject fixes after exposure tweaks
Fewer rework rounds
Show 2 more scenarios
Wedding photographers
Manage mixed lighting across a day
More consistent skin tone
A single catalog stream keeps corrected RAW results and retouch edits together for consistent export sets.
Small studios
Standardize edits across shooters
More predictable client outputs
Preset-based workflows help deliver similar look parameters across batches from different shoots.
Best for: Fits when photographers need cataloging, RAW development, and retouching without switching tools.
Adobe Photoshop
enterpriseRaster photo editing software with layer-based workflows, retouching tools, and AI-assisted edits.
Content-Aware Fill that can restructure selected image areas with context-aware synthesis inside a layer workflow.
Adobe Photoshop is the most feature-dense choice in this ranking, with a layer-first editing engine and deep retouching toolset. Core capabilities include RAW processing via Adobe Camera Raw, non-destructive adjustment layers, and a wide set of blend modes for composite work.
The app also provides automation options through Actions and scripting, along with extensibility through its plugin ecosystem. For photo editions, it fits teams that need repeatable edits, precise masking control, and format-aware output for print and web.
- +Layer-based workflow supports complex composites with predictable edit history
- +Camera Raw integration keeps RAW exposure and color adjustments inside one document pipeline
- +Automation via Actions and scripting speeds up repeat retouching and exports
- +Extensible plugin ecosystem covers specialized effects and production needs
- –High learning curve for masking, adjustment stacks, and layer blending
- –Catalog management and bulk workflows are less centralized than dedicated photo organizers
- –Large batch throughput can require careful file handling and automation discipline
- –Some editing steps depend on add-ons or companion workflows
Best for: Fits when editors need intricate layer and masking control plus repeatable automation across mixed photo work.
Corel PaintShop Pro
SMBWindows photo editing software with layers, raw tools, graphic design features, and AI effects.
One-click face and portrait retouching tools tied into layer results.
Corel PaintShop Pro edits photos with a layer-based workflow that supports masking, retouching, and targeted color changes. The RAW pipeline includes demosaicing and editing controls for 16-bit output, and the software carries sidecar metadata handling so EXIF data is not discarded during export.
Batch processing supports repeating edits across folders, which is practical for throughput-heavy tasks. Output tools include ICC color profiling and print-oriented exports that preserve color intent for physical workflows.
- +Layer-based editing with flexible masking for precise adjustments
- +RAW editing maintains a coherent workflow from capture to export
- +Batch processing applies consistent edits across large photo sets
- +Retouching tools like healing support quick blemish removal
- –Non-destructive behavior depends on saving the right project format
- –Catalog and metadata organization are weaker than dedicated photo managers
- –Some advanced compositing workflows feel less direct than nodal tools
- –Automation and integration options are limited compared with enterprise editors
Best for: Fits when photographers need fast layer-and-mask editing plus RAW export for small teams and personal workflows.
Photopea
SMBBrowser-based photo editing software with PSD support, layers, masks, and export tools.
Direct PSD layer editing in the browser with Photoshop-style tools and keyboard navigation.
Photopea is a web-based photo editor that brings a Photoshop-style layer workflow to the browser. Editing supports layer masks, blend modes, and export to common raster formats.
The editor can open PSD files and preserve layers in many cases. Photopea also handles common retouching tools like healing and cloning with keyboard-driven workflows.
- +PSD import keeps many layered structures for quick browser edits
- +Layer masks and blend modes support non-destructive-style revisions
- +Retouching toolset includes healing and clone workflows
- +Export options cover major raster output formats
- –RAW pipelines and camera-sidecar workflows are not a primary focus
- –Large multilayer files can feel slower in the browser runtime
- –Advanced color management controls are limited versus pro desktop editors
- –Collaboration and admin governance controls are not built for teams
Best for: Fits when quick browser edits are needed for layered PSD files without installing desktop software.
Pixlr
SMBWeb photo editing software with quick edits, layered design tools, and AI image features.
Layer-based editing in-browser with adjustment layers and blend modes for reversible composite changes.
Pixlr differentiates itself with a browser-first photo editor that combines common retouching tools with cloud-style project handling.
It supports layer-based composition workflows, including blend modes and non-destructive adjustment options for many edits.
Editing is organized around a straightforward canvas and tool palette, which keeps typical photo cleanup tasks fast.
For deeper photo finishing, Pixlr offers color and correction controls that fit quick revisions rather than a full RAW pipeline.
- +Browser-based layer editing with blend modes for quick composite work
- +Straightforward retouching toolset for fast cleanup on single images
- +Non-destructive adjustment layers for reversible exposure and color tweaks
- +Export workflows support common formats for handoff to other tools
- –RAW pipeline depth is limited compared with RAW-centric editors
- –Advanced selection and masking controls feel less granular than desktop leaders
- –Automation and API access are not built around repeatable batch pipelines
- –High-volume editing and large catalogs need external workflow management
Best for: Fits when editors need quick browser-based layer edits and reversible adjustments for individual photos.
BeFunky
SMBWeb-based photo editor with touch-up tools, effects, collage creation, and design templates.
Localized masking with adjustable brush tools for selective edits without rebuilding the whole image stack.
BeFunky combines web-first photo editing with a set of guided tools for common retouching and creative effects. The editor focuses on quick layer-based adjustments, localized masking workflows, and export options that preserve key file metadata during typical edits.
Its batch-oriented workflow supports mass processing for resizing and format conversion, which reduces repetitive work for teams that deliver similar outputs. Compared with deeper pro editors, BeFunky prioritizes turnaround time and usability over a fully featured RAW pipeline and granular color management.
- +Localized masking tools make subject-only edits straightforward
- +Layer-based editing supports non-destructive rework for common tasks
- +Batch processing reduces time for resizing and format conversion
- +Export controls cover common share formats for production handoffs
- –RAW pipeline depth is limited versus pro raw developers
- –Color management controls are thinner for press-grade output
- –Advanced composite workflows need more manual steps than layered editors
- –Workflow automation relies more on UI actions than programmable controls
Best for: Fits when small teams need fast edits, masked retouching, and batch exports without deep RAW or color-managed pipelines.
CyberLink PhotoDirector
SMBPhoto editing software with raw tools, layer editing, AI effects, and asset management features.
Guided correction workflow combines fast refinement steps with localized masking without switching tools.
CyberLink PhotoDirector delivers a guided photo editing workflow with a dedicated RAW pipeline and a large set of one-click and adjustable correction tools. The editor supports non-destructive editing, localized masking, and batch processing for consistent results across large photo sets.
Editing output can be preserved with sidecar metadata and layered export options for common publishing formats. Compared with tools focused on high-end compositing, PhotoDirector emphasizes speed for photo finishing and catalog-style organization rather than deep layer control.
- +Localized masking tools cover common portrait and object edits quickly
- +Batch processing supports consistent finishing across many photos
- +RAW pipeline keeps edits editable through parametric adjustments
- +Export options fit common sharing and print-oriented workflows
- –Layer-based workflow feels narrower than Photoshop-class editors
- –Advanced compositing tools lack depth for complex node-style setups
Best for: Fits when photographers need fast, non-destructive RAW finishing with localized edits and batch output.
Movavi Photo Editor
SMBConsumer photo editing software with retouching, object removal, color correction, and AI enhancements.
Non-destructive adjustment layers with editable effects make routine tweaks easy to revise without restarting the edit.
Movavi Photo Editor is a Windows and macOS editor focused on fast, guided adjustments and quick one-off enhancements for finished images. It supports layer-based workflows with adjustable effects, plus RAW file editing through a built-in pipeline that keeps common camera metadata handling in place.
The feature set emphasizes organized crop, color, and retouch tools rather than deep graph-style compositing. For photo editors who need clean output and straightforward editing steps, it offers a lighter alternative to Photoshop, Capture One, and ON1 Photo RAW.
- +Layer-based adjustments keep edits revisable during routine retouching
- +Guided correction tools speed up contrast, color, and clarity passes
- +Batch processing handles repeated export settings for edited sets
- +Retouch brushes cover spot healing and practical cleanup tasks
- –Advanced RAW controls are less granular than Capture One and Photoshop
- –Workflow depth is limited for multi-step compositing and masking
Best for: Fits when quick edits, basic retouching, and consistent exports matter more than deep compositing controls.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 art design, Luminar Neo stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right photo edition software
Photo edition software covers RAW development, layer-based retouching, masking-driven local edits, and repeatable export across photo workflows. This guide frames the market through the ten tools reviewed here, including Luminar Neo, Capture One, ON1 Photo RAW, and Adobe Photoshop. The coverage also includes Corel PaintShop Pro, Photopea, Pixlr, BeFunky, CyberLink PhotoDirector, and Movavi Photo Editor.
The comparison focus stays on integration depth and workflow control, especially tethered shooting and session synchronization in Capture One. It also covers how edit history and non-destructive behavior differ between layer-first tools like Photoshop and browser-first editors like Photopea. Automation and extensibility matter most where tools attach repeatable adjustments to sessions and exports rather than manual one-off edits.
Photo edition software for non-destructive RAW finishing and layered retouching
Photo edition software is used to turn captured images into finished files through non-destructive editing, including RAW exposure and color adjustments plus local refinements. Many tools keep edits revisable through layer-based workflows, parametric controls, or guided correction steps that can be applied consistently across sets.
Luminar Neo emphasizes guided AI edits that target sky, subject, and structure while keeping the results adjustable through its effect-style edit stack. Capture One centers on tethered capture with session control so live selection and adjustment settings stay synchronized during shooting, then batch exports can follow the same decisions.
Photo edition features that determine edit control and workflow throughput
Non-destructive RAW finishing depends on how well a tool keeps adjustments editable across masking and export steps. This guide focuses on features that change how editors iterate, manage layers, and reuse decisions across many photos.
Tools differ most when the workflow is tethered, session-managed, or designed around layers inside a document. Luminar Neo, Capture One, ON1 Photo RAW, and Adobe Photoshop also diverge on where repeatability lives, either in an effects-style stack, a session, a catalog, or a layer timeline.
Tethered session workflow and synchronized adjustments
Capture One keeps tethered capture and session control tightly coupled so selection and adjustment settings stay synchronized during shooting, then batch exports can reuse the same decisions. ON1 Photo RAW emphasizes catalog continuity, while Adobe Photoshop centers synchronization inside its document pipeline rather than a shooting session.
Layer-based retouching that stays editable end to end
ON1 Photo RAW runs layer-based editing inside the RAW development environment so masking and adjustments remain non-destructive through the full edit. Adobe Photoshop uses a layer workflow with Camera Raw integration in one document pipeline, and Photopea and Pixlr bring similar layer concepts to browser editing.
Effect stack and guided edit systems for repeatable RAW finishing
Luminar Neo targets sky, subject, and structure edits with guided AI tools while keeping results adjustable through its effect-style edit stack. CyberLink PhotoDirector also uses a guided correction workflow with localized masking for fast non-destructive finishing across batches.
Compositing depth and masking control for complex edits
Adobe Photoshop provides the deepest layer and masking control with Content-Aware Fill that restructures selected areas with contextual synthesis. Photoshop-style compositing depth is narrower in ON1 Photo RAW and feels thinner in browser-first tools like Pixlr and Photopea for multilayer complexity.
Library scale behavior and catalog-centered organization
ON1 Photo RAW includes a catalog workflow that organizes edits across shooting sessions, but catalog and preview operations can slow down on very large libraries. Adobe Photoshop and Capture One lean more toward centralized pipelines, while dedicated organizers like Luminar Neo and Corel PaintShop Pro place less weight on heavy library operations.
Choose based on where repeatability and edit history live
Photo edition software differs less on whether it supports masking and layers, and more on where it records decisions so they can be reused across a shoot or across a large library. The right choice depends on whether repeatability comes from a shooting session, a document layer stack, a catalog, or guided effects.
Capture One is the tether-first option, Luminar Neo is the guided-effects-first option, and Adobe Photoshop is the deep layer and automation-first option. ON1 Photo RAW bridges RAW development with layer retouching, while browser editors trade depth for quick PSD-friendly iteration.
Select the repeatability anchor: session, effect stack, or document layers
Choose Capture One when tethered capture needs synchronized selection and adjustment settings that follow the shoot into batch exports. Choose Luminar Neo when repeatable finishing comes from guided effects in an adjustable effect stack instead of manual layer management.
Decide how far RAW editing and layer retouching should stay in one workflow
Choose ON1 Photo RAW when layer-based retouching must remain inside the RAW development environment so masking and adjustments stay non-destructive end to end. Choose Adobe Photoshop when RAW exposure and color adjustments need to stay inside a layer workflow with complex composite control.
Match compositing complexity to the tool’s layer depth
Choose Adobe Photoshop when intricate composites and masking require the deepest layer workflow control and Content-Aware Fill behavior. Choose ON1 Photo RAW or Corel PaintShop Pro when layer editing exists but the edit plan stays within a narrower retouching and portrait workflow scope.
Plan for library scale and catalog performance needs
Choose ON1 Photo RAW when cataloging must keep RAW development and retouching organized across sessions. If library operations must stay fast at very large scales, account for ON1 Photo RAW’s catalog and preview slowdown risk and compare how Photoshop and Capture One handle bulk work differently.
Use browser editing only when PSD-layer iteration speed matters more than RAW depth
Choose Photopea when quick browser edits on PSD layer files must preserve layered structure for direct mask and blend-mode work. Choose Pixlr when browser-based adjustment layers and blend modes support reversible composite changes, and accept that RAW pipeline depth is limited compared with RAW-centric editors.
Pick guided correction tools when the workflow is centered on batch finishing
Choose CyberLink PhotoDirector when localized masking with guided correction steps should accelerate portrait and object refinements across many photos. Choose Movavi Photo Editor when routine tweaks should be revisable through editable adjustment layers and guided clarity and contrast passes, while accepting lower granularity for advanced RAW control.
Who each tool fits best in photo editing workflows
The right tool depends on which step consumes time during editing. Editors who lose time during capture-to-select should favor tethered session synchronization. Editors who lose time during rework should favor layer or effect-stack edit history that stays adjustable.
This guide also separates editors who need deep compositing control from editors who need fast, consistent finishing. The ten tools below map to distinct workflow philosophies with different ceilings for color-managed output and complex masking.
Studio teams that shoot tethered and need session-level repeatability
Capture One keeps tethered capture and session control synchronized so selections and adjustment settings match what the team sees on set. This workflow reduces friction before batch exports start.
Photographers who want RAW development plus non-destructive layer retouching without tool switching
ON1 Photo RAW keeps parametric RAW controls and layer-based retouching together so masking and adjustments stay non-destructive through the end-to-end process. The catalog workflow organizes edits across shooting sessions.
Editors who rely on guided, repeatable finishing for sky, subject, and structure
Luminar Neo targets sky, subject, and structure with guided AI tools while keeping results adjustable through an effect stack. This supports consistent batch exports when the edit plan stays within those guided categories.
Retouchers who build complex composites and need maximum masking control
Adobe Photoshop supports intricate composites with Content-Aware Fill and predictable edit history in a layer workflow. It also integrates Camera Raw exposure and color adjustments inside the same document pipeline.
Editors who need quick PSD-layer edits inside a browser
Photopea performs direct PSD layer editing with Photoshop-style tools and blend modes in a browser runtime. Pixlr also supports adjustment layers and blend modes for reversible composite changes.
Common pitfalls that break non-destructive workflows and edit reuse
Non-destructive behavior fails when the workflow uses the wrong edit representation for the intended output path. It also fails when an editor assumes a guided or layer-first tool supports the same compositing and color-managed depth as a document-first editor.
The pitfalls below show where these tools diverge, including where catalog performance can slow large libraries and where browser-first tools trade RAW pipeline depth for quick iteration.
Expecting browser-first editors to match RAW pipeline depth and camera-sidecar workflows
Photopea and Pixlr keep layered PSD structures editable in the browser, but RAW pipelines are not a primary focus and multilayer throughput can feel slower. Match browser edits to PSD-layer finishing tasks instead of advanced RAW development.
Building advanced compositing plans in tools that focus more on retouching than composite depth
ON1 Photo RAW’s layer-based workflow supports non-destructive retouching, but complex node-style setups lack the depth of Photoshop-class compositing. Adobe Photoshop is the safer choice when composite control must include Content-Aware Fill behavior and intricate layer blending.
Assuming catalog-based workflows will stay fast as library size grows
ON1 Photo RAW can slow during catalog and preview operations on very large libraries. If throughput at scale is the deciding factor, compare session or document-centered organization using Capture One or Adobe Photoshop workflows.
Treating guided finishing tools as drop-in replacements for strict print-grade color management
Luminar Neo and CyberLink PhotoDirector support guided finishing and batch consistency, but advanced color workflows can require external steps for strict print pipelines. When output must be tightly controlled, allocate extra time for profile-driven output checks.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Luminar Neo, Capture One, ON1 Photo RAW, Adobe Photoshop, Corel PaintShop Pro, Photopea, Pixlr, BeFunky, CyberLink PhotoDirector, and Movavi Photo Editor using feature coverage at 40%, ease at 30%, and value at 30%. Feature coverage emphasized how editing stays non-destructive across masking and layer or effect-stack structures.
We prioritized integration depth where the workflow creates reuse pressure such as tethered capture synchronization in Capture One and session-driven iteration patterns. Luminar Neo earned top ranking by pairing guided AI edits for sky, subject, and structure with an adjustable effect-stack workflow that preserves iteration speed without forcing manual layer management.
Frequently Asked Questions About photo edition software
How does Capture One compare with Adobe Photoshop for non-destructive RAW editing?
Which tool handles tethered capture and session-based organization best for studio work?
How should photo editors migrate catalogs or libraries when switching to ON1 Photo RAW or Luminar Neo?
What breaks if a workflow requires layer-capable retouching for delivery work in Photopea?
When do layer-based editing tools like ON1 Photo RAW and Adobe Photoshop outperform guided editors like Luminar Neo?
How do Adobe Photoshop and Capture One differ for color-managed output using ICC profiles?
How can ON1 Photo RAW and Corel PaintShop Pro preserve metadata during batch exports?
Which software supports automation for repeatable edits across mixed photo work?
Where does Luminar Neo fall short compared with Adobe Photoshop for advanced compositing tasks?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Art Design alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of art design tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare art design tools→