
GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Storage Moving RelocationTop 10 Best Network Backup Software of 2026
Compare network backup software options for IT teams, with practical notes on Cohesity DataProtect, Rubrik Security Cloud, and Veeam Backup & Replication.
How we ranked these tools
Vendors set the topic, but our editors set the inclusion criteria and the evaluation framework before research starts.
AI search agents find sources, extract figures with provenance, and aggregate written reviews. They also transcribe video reviews and podcasts.
Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Cohesity DataProtect is the best pick for enterprise admins who want policy-driven backup orchestration across sites, because recovery orchestration maps workloads to consistent recovery points for repeatable failover testing; for smaller teams, MSP360 Backup fits since it centralizes job control and monitoring with straightforward restore targeting.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Cohesity DataProtect
Recovery orchestration with restore plans ties specific workloads to consistent recovery points during failover testing.
Best for: Fits when administrators need policy-driven backup orchestration with automated API integration across sites.
Rubrik Security Cloud
Editor pickRubrik orchestration ties protected inventory, snapshot metadata, and governed restore actions into an automation-ready recovery workflow.
Best for: Fits when administrators need governed, automated restores across VM and NAS fleets with API-driven operations.
Veeam Backup & Replication
Editor pickSureBackup recovery validation automates end-to-end restore testing by running workloads in a controlled scope.
Best for: Fits when admins need automated VM-centric backups plus consistent recovery workflows across multiple sites.
Comparison Table
Cohesity DataProtect
enterpriseHyperconverged data protection platform delivering backup, file services, and data management from a single scale-out cluster.
Recovery orchestration with restore plans ties specific workloads to consistent recovery points during failover testing.
Cohesity DataProtect focuses on centralized job orchestration for backup and recovery, with restore plans that can be executed for specific recovery points instead of browsing raw backup sets. Protection policies define where data lands, how long recovery points are retained, and how replication to secondary locations is handled for disaster recovery planning. The platform also includes automation hooks through an API for provisioning workflows, configuration export, and integration with external orchestration tools.
A practical tradeoff is that advanced workflows tend to require disciplined configuration of storage targets, network paths, and policy inheritance to avoid unintended recovery-point placement. DataProtect is a strong fit when teams need controlled restore execution across virtual machines and file shares, plus consistent retention and replication behavior for multi-site recovery testing.
- +Policy-driven orchestration links backup, retention, and recovery execution
- +API supports configuration automation and integration with external tooling
- +Inline deduplication reduces protected data footprint on target
- +Centralized recovery-point tracking simplifies restore planning
- –Advanced policy inheritance can create surprising restore-point placement
- –Some integrations require deliberate design of network paths and storage
Storage and backup admins
Automate protection policy provisioning at scale
Fewer manual configuration errors
Disaster recovery leads
Repeatable recovery testing across sites
Faster RTO verification
Show 2 more scenarios
Virtualization teams
Restore virtual machines to known points
Consistent recovery execution
Image-oriented recovery workflows support workload restores from targeted recovery points.
Operations teams
Centralize long-term retention and restores
Reduced time to restore
Retention policies keep recovery points organized for audits and operational restores.
Best for: Fits when administrators need policy-driven backup orchestration with automated API integration across sites.
Rubrik Security Cloud
enterpriseZero-trust data security platform combining backup, ransomware recovery, and data observability.
Rubrik orchestration ties protected inventory, snapshot metadata, and governed restore actions into an automation-ready recovery workflow.
Rubrik Security Cloud centers on snapshot-centric protection and long-term retention workflows that administrators can manage with policy configuration and role-based access controls. The system records operational history through audit logging and exposes that history for troubleshooting restore failures and policy drift. For data protection coverage, it supports VM workloads, NAS shares, and file servers through workload-aware connectors rather than only generic file copying. For recovery execution, it provides cataloging and guided restore workflows that reduce the steps required to get from backup metadata to restored systems.
A practical tradeoff is that Rubrik’s recovery automation depends on maintaining consistent integration points and naming conventions across workloads, because restore workflows pull from the platform’s protected inventory. Rubrik fits teams managing mixed vSphere and physical server fleets who need governed restores with automation tied to operational events rather than one-off manual retrieval. It also fits environments that want to automate protection actions through API calls and enforce audit trails for administrator actions tied to retention and recovery.
- +Policy-driven snapshot and backup orchestration with governed retention controls
- +API surface supports automation of protection changes and operational actions
- +Audit logs track administrator operations tied to protection and restore events
- +Catalog-backed restore workflows reduce manual recovery steps
- –Restore automation relies on consistent workload registration and metadata freshness
- –Advanced governance workflows require discipline in RBAC and policy design
- –Some workload integrations need connector tuning to meet throughput targets
- –Cross-site recovery workflows add operational complexity during failover drills
Enterprise infrastructure admins
Ransomware recovery with controlled restores
Reduced recovery decision time
Backup operations engineers
Automate protection and reporting
Less manual runbook work
Show 2 more scenarios
Compliance and governance teams
Enforce access and traceability
Clear audit trails
Apply RBAC controls and review audit logs to trace restore and retention-related administrator actions.
Disaster recovery coordinators
Test cross-site recovery drills
Faster DR validation cycles
Coordinate recovery exercises using managed replication and restore inventory for predictable failover timelines.
Best for: Fits when administrators need governed, automated restores across VM and NAS fleets with API-driven operations.
Veeam Backup & Replication
enterpriseEnterprise-grade backup, replication, and recovery for virtual, physical, and cloud workloads.
SureBackup recovery validation automates end-to-end restore testing by running workloads in a controlled scope.
Veeam Backup & Replication is a network backup software choice for backup administrators that need repeatable protection for VMware vSphere and Microsoft Hyper-V workloads with an operational job workflow. It performs block-level incremental backups using changed block tracking, which reduces backup windows by only processing modified data blocks. The platform also supports disk-to-disk backup jobs so backup targets can be standardized across sites and environments.
Restore paths in Veeam include bare-metal restore capabilities that support full recovery scenarios when infrastructure must be rebuilt. Media management and restore testing are integrated into the management experience so teams can validate recovery points rather than only rely on completed backups. A tradeoff is that the strongest fit comes when the environment centers on supported virtualization platforms rather than purely agentless file copy workflows.
A common usage situation is protecting virtual machines across multiple clusters where retention policies and scheduled jobs must stay consistent. Security-oriented teams can also use hardened or immutable repository setups combined with encryption and retention controls to make backup copies harder to alter during ransomware events.
- +Changed block tracking reduces backup windows for VMs with frequent churn
- +Recurrent restore workflow supports recovery verification and reportable restore points
- +Hyper-V and VMware integration keeps job definitions aligned to virtual inventory
- +Bare-metal restore support reduces dependency on separate recovery tooling
- –Advanced design requires careful storage and transport planning for throughput goals
- –Agent handling for non-virtual workloads needs extra configuration effort
- –NDMP coverage for NAS depends on specific device and driver compatibility
- –Large-scale deployments benefit from governance around repositories and job sprawl
Security and infrastructure teams
Harden backup copies against ransomware
More resistant recovery copies
Enterprise backup administrators
Keep offline archive backup copies
Separated recovery copy set
Show 2 more scenarios
Storage administrators and file teams
Back up NAS file shares
Recoverable shared file data
Administrators back up NAS shares through supported access methods and restore files with permission metadata.
Virtualization administrators
Protect VMware and Hyper-V VMs
Controlled VM restore points
Teams run image-based VM backup jobs with incremental processing and retention policies to control backup windows.
Best for: Fits when admins need automated VM-centric backups plus consistent recovery workflows across multiple sites.
Acronis Cyber Protect
enterpriseIntegrated backup and cybersecurity platform combining disk imaging with anti-malware and anti-ransomware.
Disaster recovery orchestration that coordinates recovery plan components for repeatable restore testing.
Acronis Cyber Protect performs image-level and file-level backups across endpoints and servers, including systems that are offline at backup time when agent-driven workflows are used. It supports centralized management for backup policies, retention, and disaster recovery planning, and it integrates with virtualization and cloud targets for recovery testing.
- +Image-level restores for bare-metal recovery across managed hosts
- +Centralized policy management for retention, schedules, and recovery plans
- +Built-in disaster recovery orchestration for restore readiness
- +API and automation options for scheduled protection and configuration
- –Agent-based coverage can increase footprint and operational overhead
- –Multi-site throughput tuning takes planning for WAN constrained links
- –Granular RBAC and approval workflows require careful configuration design
- –Large scale reporting can feel slow during frequent policy changes
IT operations teams
Standardize endpoint backup policies
Consistent restore readiness
Storage and infrastructure teams
Include NAS shares in protection
Additional shared file protection
Show 2 more scenarios
Help desk and IT support
Restore specific files or folders
Targeted data restoration
Administrators recover selected files or folders from broader image and file backup sets.
Hybrid infrastructure teams
Manage mixed workloads in one place
Unified backup management
Teams protect physical systems, virtual machines, servers, endpoints, and cloud workloads from one administration surface.
Best for: Fits when administrators need governed backup policies plus image-level disaster recovery orchestration across mixed endpoints and servers.
Veritas Backup Exec
enterpriseCentralized backup and recovery for physical and virtual servers with integrated deduplication.
Media management and catalog-driven restore workflow designed for repeatable tape and disk retention operations.
Backup Exec is built around centrally defined backup jobs that run on protected hosts via installed components and then record restore points in its catalog. The workflow supports granular selection of file and volume sources, offers configurable retention and overwrite policies, and can target local disk, network storage, and tape libraries for long-term retention. Integration depth shows up in its hypervisor support shape and in the way jobs can be structured for different workloads rather than only one generic backup mode. Governance comes from catalog-based restore browsing, consistent job scheduling, and operator-oriented controls for job monitoring and media management.
- +Tape library and long-term retention workflows fit traditional backup operations
- +Central job scheduling with retention and overwrite controls reduces operator variance
- +Catalog-based restore browsing speeds targeted recovery actions
- +Granular source selection supports mixed file and volume protection needs
- –Agent dependency increases rollout work in large heterogeneous fleets
- –Cross-platform orchestration and automation require more console and job planning
- –Throughput tuning often needs per-workload validation for optimal performance
- –Hypervisor coverage varies by configuration and deployment method
IT infrastructure teams
Daily file and volume backups
Faster file-level recovery
Mid-size server teams
Hypervisor-hosted workloads
Reduced restore planning time
Show 2 more scenarios
Compliance-focused IT groups
Tape-backed retention requirements
Audit-aligned retention evidence
Teams maintain overwrite and retention controls for long-lived recovery archives.
Operations teams
Restore testing drills
Lower recovery-risk uncertainty
Admins use the catalog to validate restores and run repeatable recovery procedures.
Best for: Fits when administrators need tape-capable backups with predictable job operations and catalog-driven restores.
MSP360 Backup
SMBCross-platform backup software supporting local, network, and cloud destinations with per-machine licensing.
System image backup plus granular file restore from the same managed environment, with per-job restore targeting.
MSP360 Backup targets network and endpoint protection with file-based and system image backup workflows from one admin console. The product emphasizes centralized management, configurable retention, and disaster recovery readiness for common Windows and server environments.
- +Central console for job scheduling, monitoring, and restore actions across many endpoints
- +Configurable retention policies support controlled long-term recovery points
- +Flexible restore targets for files and system images without manual tooling swaps
- +Standardized job creation reduces per-host backup drift
- –Network backup workflows rely heavily on agent deployment and ongoing health checks
- –Advanced data movement controls like LAN-free or tape integration are not the primary focus
Organizations and MSPs
Choose network and cloud storage targets
Storage workflow flexibility
Managed service providers
Centralize customer backup delivery
Repeatable restore operations
Show 2 more scenarios
Server and systems administrators
Protect physical and virtual server workloads
Recoverable infrastructure data
Administrators back up physical and virtual servers plus supported Microsoft 365 and SQL Server workloads.
IT teams managing endpoints
Schedule image and file backups for employees
Consistent endpoint protection
Teams use installed agents to schedule file and image backups for Windows, macOS, or Linux endpoints.
Best for: Fits when a mid-market team needs centralized backup orchestration for endpoints and servers without deep platform-specific integrations.
N-able Backup
SMBMSP-focused backup and disaster recovery with integrated cloud storage and rapid image-based recovery.
Policy-driven protection management with RBAC and audit visibility in the same administrative console.
N-able Backup runs scheduled backup jobs from a centralized management console and focuses on consistent policy enforcement across managed systems.
- +Central web console for backup monitoring, reporting, and policy-driven job control
- +Role-based access limits who can configure protection policies and view job outcomes
- +Granular restore workflows support file recovery without requiring full restores
- +Operational audit visibility helps trace backup failures and configuration changes
- –Agent rollout and tuning require planning for large site counts
- –Restore automation and orchestration depth is weaker than larger enterprise suites
- –Throughput and concurrency controls can feel limited during heavy restore windows
- –Advanced storage optimization features are less extensive than leading enterprise products
Managed service providers
Run scheduled backups for multiple clients
Restore visibility per client
Virtualization administrators
Centralize VM backup and restore handling
Centralized VM recovery points
Show 2 more scenarios
IT administrators
Apply recurring backup policies to endpoints
Restorable endpoint states
Teams apply recurring backup policies to workstations and recover system-level states when needed.
IT and security teams
Prepare for ransomware recovery
Greater restore confidence
Teams combine retention policies, immutable repositories, and recovery testing to improve readiness.
Best for: Fits when mid-market teams need centralized backup governance with RBAC and repeatable recovery workflows.
BorgBackup
enterpriseDeduplicating, compressing, and encrypting backup tool designed for efficient network transfers via SSH.
Content-addressed deduplication inside Borg repositories reduces data movement and storage growth across archives.
BorgBackup is a network backup solution built around the Borg repository engine, which stores data as content-addressed chunks with optional authenticated encryption. It supports deduplication across backups, block-level incremental updates via append-only repositories, and retention policies that prune old archives without rewriting the whole history.
- +Content-addressed chunk deduplication reduces storage growth across many backups
- +Append-only repository model enables efficient incremental snapshots without full rewrites
- +Authenticated encryption supports secure remote repository writes over SSH transport
- +Archive-level restore supports point-in-time extraction and verification workflows
- –Operational discipline is required to manage repository health, scrubbing, and maintenance
- –Centralized admin controls like RBAC and per-job audit logging are not built in
- –Large-scale orchestration and UI-driven monitoring require external tooling
- –Restore speed depends on chunk locality and repository access performance
Linux system administrators
Back up changing server data efficiently
Efficient incremental history
NAS administrators and small IT
Archive NAS or mounted share data
Centralized backup copies
Show 2 more scenarios
Distributed IT teams
Store encrypted off-host archives over SSH
Protected off-host copies
Backup jobs transmit encrypted archives over SSH to a separate host or storage system.
Technical home users
Schedule encrypted personal backups
Encrypted deduplicated recovery points
Home users preserve documents and photos in scheduled archives using encryption and deduplication.
Best for: Fits when teams need scriptable deduplicated repository backups over SSH with deterministic point-in-time restores.
UrBackup
SMBClient-server backup system providing image and file-level backups for Windows and Linux machines over the network.
Restore-first workflow combines disk image restore with integrated file restores from the same backup history.
UrBackup differentiates itself with a server-driven backup workflow that targets machines via an installation-based agent and stores backups on a central server. It combines image-style full-disk capture on supported clients with block-level change detection to reduce transfer volume and speed up repeated runs.
- +Centralized client backup control from one admin console
- +Incremental behavior based on changed block tracking to cut repeated transfers
- +Built-in restore workflows for file and disk-level recovery cases
- +REST API enables automation of client registration and job scheduling
- –Advanced enterprise governance like granular RBAC and audit logging is limited
- –Large-scale tenant-style isolation and workload partitioning are not the primary focus
- –High-frequency schedules can increase agent storage pressure on endpoints
- –WAN-focused replication workflows require careful design rather than built-in orchestration
Small IT teams
Manage centralized backup for many computers
Centralized status visibility
Small business administrators
Use network storage for repository
Centralized recovery points
Show 2 more scenarios
Teams with multi-site needs
Send backups to an offsite repository
Separate recovery repository
Backup data is deployed to a separate server or remote storage location for additional recovery coverage.
Backup storage administrators
Control repository growth with retention
More predictable recovery windows
Administrators apply retention rules and monitor repository size as backup points accumulate across clients.
Best for: Fits when a small to mid-size org needs centralized agent backups and automated client management without deep enterprise orchestration.
Bacula
enterpriseOpen-source enterprise network backup system with client-server architecture supporting tape, disk, and cloud targets.
Catalog-first restores, using Bacula’s database-backed backup history to target volumes and files by recorded metadata.
Bacula fits environments that need long-lived, administrator-controlled backup operations across heterogeneous hosts, because it uses a central director with job scheduling and distributed storage daemons. It supports file and volume backup workflows with configurable retention and cataloging, and it can drive restores through scripted job definitions.
- +Director-driven scheduling with distinct director, storage, and file daemons
- +Catalog integration records backup metadata for targeted restore decisions
- +Config-based job definitions support repeatable governance through change control
- +Plugin extensibility covers nonstandard workflows and environments
- –Operational tuning is required to hit predictable throughput under load
- –Web UI coverage is limited compared with the depth of core configuration
- –Complexity rises with multi-site layouts and cross-host restore workflows
- –Granular access control depends on how the authentication and services are deployed
IT operations teams
Centralize scheduled backups for distributed clients
Consistent execution from one system
Backup administrators
Run recurring full, differential, and incremental jobs
More frequent backup points
Show 2 more scenarios
NAS and storage administrators
Protect files from NAS shares
Centrally tracked NAS backups
Administrators configure backup jobs to back up files from NAS shares and exported storage with environment-specific access planning.
Infrastructure teams
Back up heterogeneous platforms with one framework
Common backup framework
Teams define backup jobs for mixed clients across operating systems, filesystems, and storage targets within one configuration model.
Best for: Fits when administrators need cataloged, policy-driven backups across mixed hosts and can manage configuration as code.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 network backup software, Cohesity DataProtect stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
Frequently Asked Questions About Network Backup Software
How do Veeam Backup & Replication and Rubrik Security Cloud differ in VM restore workflows for administrators?
Which products provide tape-capable media management and catalog-driven restore operations?
When is changed block tracking a key factor, and where does it show up in the feature set?
What breaks if a backup platform lacks tested bare-metal restore coverage for server recovery?
How do Cohesity DataProtect and Rubrik Security Cloud handle API-driven automation for recovery operations?
Which tool fits administrators who need RBAC plus audit logging in the same administrative console?
When does NDMP matter for network attached storage protection, and how do options in this list compare?
What migration tasks are typically required when moving to BorgBackup from a backup system with traditional storage layouts?
How do admins manage extensibility and configuration control in Bacula compared with web-console-first tools?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
How to Choose the Right Network Backup Software
Options separate most on how reliably and transparently restores work in the environments you actually run, not on backup wording. Look first at Restore verification, then at Integration depth for automation and reporting control.
Restore verification reporting
Why it matters
Restore verification reporting matters because the value of network backup software is the ability to prove you can get data back when it counts. Without clear outcomes, you can’t trust that backups match what you need to restore.
How to check
In a demo, trigger a small restore to a test location and confirm what status and logs appear for the restore attempt. Ask whether the tool can produce a report that you can export or review later, not just show a screen message.
Retention and legal holds controls
Why it matters
Retention and legal holds controls matter because network backup software often supports compliance expectations and business investigations. Weak retention handling can lead to surprises when you need older versions.
How to check
Review the retention options for older backups and how long they persist after you delete or modify a job. Ask to see how a legal hold is applied, whether it blocks deletion, and how you remove it later.
Throughput during active workloads
Why it matters
Throughput during active workloads matters because backups compete with real traffic on a network. If the tool throttles poorly, backups can stall or complete too late.
How to check
Request a demo with the same or similar sources you care about and watch job timing while other network traffic runs. Check whether you can set bandwidth or schedule windows, and whether the system reports actual transfer throughput.
Automation API and job control
Why it matters
Automation API and job control matter because network backup software lives inside existing operations workflows. Better automation reduces manual job babysitting and makes changes auditable.
How to check
Ask for an API walkthrough: creating or editing backup jobs, starting runs, and fetching status. Confirm whether there are documented endpoints or scripts for common actions and whether changes appear in the audit log.
RBAC and audit log coverage
Why it matters
RBAC and audit log coverage matters because teams need separation of duties around backup jobs and restores. If logs are incomplete, you lose traceability after incidents.
How to check
In the admin console, create two roles (backup manager vs. auditor) and see which actions each can perform. Then check whether role actions, job changes, and restore attempts show up in the audit log with timestamps and identifiers.
Configuration drift and rollback options
Why it matters
Configuration drift and rollback options matter because backup job changes accumulate over time. When a misconfiguration happens, you need a safe way to revert without rebuilding everything.
How to check
In the demo, modify a job policy (schedules or destination) and verify whether the system keeps a history or versioning. Ask how you roll back to a previous configuration and whether the restore workflow references the correct historical policy.
Red flags
- Restore verification is shown as a vague success message without exportable evidence
- Retention rules look separate from legal hold behavior or don’t block deletion clearly
- Job control automation is limited to manual console clicks with no usable API or audit trail
Fit by situation
- If you support frequent restore requests, prioritize Restore verification reporting so restores generate evidence you can review later.
- If you must coordinate changes across teams, prioritize RBAC and audit log coverage to keep job edits traceable.
- If your backups run alongside business traffic, prioritize Throughput during active workloads to avoid timing misses.
Funding and competing interests
This study was co-funded by several of the vendors assessed in it. No single vendor funded it. Funders could propose the market studied.
They had no role in selecting vendors, setting or weighting criteria, analysing data or drawing conclusions, and they received the same factual-accuracy check as every other vendor assessed.
Market definition, inclusion rules and criteria weights were fixed by an editor before research began and did not change afterwards. Editorial process →
- Storage Moving RelocationTop 10 Best Computer Backup Software of 2026
- Technology Digital MediaTop 10 Best Home Network Backup Software of 2026
- Storage Moving RelocationTop 10 Best Network Attached Storage Software of 2026
- Storage Moving RelocationTop 10 Best Back Up Services of 2026
- Digital Transformation In IndustryTop 10 Best Enterprise Cloud Backup Services of 2026
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Storage Moving Relocation alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of storage moving relocation tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare storage moving relocation tools→