GITNUXSOFTWARE REVIEW
Education LearningTop 10 Best Music Education Software of 2026
Compare music education software options for learning, lesson planning, and student practice, including BandLab, Noteflight, and Flat.
How we ranked these tools
Vendors set the topic, but our editors set the inclusion criteria and the evaluation framework before research starts.
Agents extract product evidence with provenance, then collect written reviews and transcribe video reviews and podcasts.
Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
BandLab is the best pick for music classes that want quick, classroom-ready recording and true project collaboration because its browser workspace makes it easy to remix and iterate with teacher and peer feedback, whereas Noteflight is a great alternative for notation-first assignments since it pairs score sharing with built-in playback review.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
BandLab
Social collaboration inside shared projects, letting students remix and iterate with teacher and peer feedback in one workspace.
Best for: Fits when music classes need fast recording and collaborative production for songwriting projects.
Noteflight
Editor pickAssignment-oriented score sharing keeps student work inside the notation editor with built-in playback review.
Best for: Fits when notation-first composition and playback review matter more than DAW-style editing.
Flat
Editor pickInline lesson assignment workflow that links student attempts and teacher feedback to the same notation content.
Best for: Fits when instructors need notation-centered assignments with fast teacher feedback for multiple cohorts.
Comparison Table
BandLab
SMBFree browser-based digital audio workstation with mixing, loops, and collaboration features.
Social collaboration inside shared projects, letting students remix and iterate with teacher and peer feedback in one workspace.
BandLab pairs a browser-first music workstation with social publishing so students can record, collaborate, and share finished tracks. Its core feature set centers on in-browser audio recording, MIDI sequencing-style editing workflows, and a library of instrument and loop resources for arranging songs.
BandLab also supports classroom-style iteration by letting instructors review student-created projects inside the same workspace, which reduces the friction between practice and submission. For education use, the strongest fit comes when listening, remixing, and collaborative production are the learning goals rather than advanced notation or assessment-heavy grading automation.
- +Browser-based recording and editing reduces setup time for classrooms
- +Project sharing supports peer review and teacher feedback loops
- +Arrangement workflows support layered tracks for songwriting practice
- +Collaboration features fit group production assignments
- –Limited control for curriculum-grade rubrics and structured assessments
- –Export and file handling workflows can become project-format dependent
- –Deeper admin governance like strict RBAC and audit logging is limited
- –Advanced notation and engraving tools are not the primary focus
Chromebook music students
Browser-based arranging and mixing projects
Projects accessible from devices
Independent music creators
Publish finished tracks from edits
Tracks ready for sharing
Show 2 more scenarios
Instrumentalists and instructors
Record parts over backing loops
Repeatable practice submissions
Students capture performances over loops and share recordings for teachers and peers to review.
Remote songwriting teams
Collaborate on shared song drafts
Coordinated revisions in one place
Teams build and revise songs together inside a shared browser project with coordinated handoffs.
Best for: Fits when music classes need fast recording and collaborative production for songwriting projects.
Noteflight
vertical specialistWeb-based music notation editor with education-specific classroom management features.
Assignment-oriented score sharing keeps student work inside the notation editor with built-in playback review.
Noteflight provides a notation editor that turns mouse and keyboard input into accurate engraving-ready scores, with playback that follows the written parts. MusicXML import and export helps reuse existing compositions and move between notation tools, while MIDI playback supports listening checks during instruction. Teacher-oriented sharing lets classes submit work inside the same score environment instead of screenshots or PDFs.
A clear tradeoff is that Noteflight is notation-centric, so advanced audio production and DAW-style editing remain limited. It fits best for notation lessons, composition assignments, and formative feedback when teachers want quick iteration and consistent playback across a classroom.
- +Browser notation editor with score playback for instant listening feedback
- +MusicXML import and export supports cross-tool score reuse
- +Part writing workflow keeps multi-instrument assignments organized
- +Assignment-style sharing reduces friction in student submission review
- –DAW-grade audio editing and mixing controls are not a core focus
- –Complex layout fine-tuning can take longer than dedicated desktop engraving tools
- –Automation and admin governance tools are lighter than full education LMS suites
- –Large ensemble scores can feel slower during frequent edits
Music teachers
Assign composition with playback feedback
Faster formative feedback loops
School music programs
Migrate existing scores to cloud editor
Reduced re-typing workload
Show 2 more scenarios
After-school ensembles
Practice arrangements with part-level edits
Up-to-date parts for rehearsals
Direct part writing helps arrange ensemble music and rehearse updated versions quickly.
Student composers
Draft scores with timeline iteration
Clearer rehearsal-ready drafts
Students refine rhythm and notation while hearing results through MIDI playback.
Best for: Fits when notation-first composition and playback review matter more than DAW-style editing.
Flat
vertical specialistCollaborative web-based music notation platform designed for educational use.
Inline lesson assignment workflow that links student attempts and teacher feedback to the same notation content.
Instructors and small schools can create lesson content directly in the browser using the notation workspace, then publish assignments to specific student groups. Flat’s assessment workflow maps teacher feedback to student attempts, and it keeps revision cycles attached to the same learning artifact. MusicXML import supports migrating existing scores, and exported notation can reduce lock-in when building mixed material sets across tools.
A key tradeoff is that Flat is strongest for instructor-led notation and practice tasks, while deeper LMS-gradebook sync and standards packaging are not its primary focus. Flat fits best when a teacher wants a consistent assignment workflow for multiple classes and needs fast feedback loops tied to the notation work.
- +MusicXML import and export supports moving existing scores into lessons
- +Assignment review workflow keeps teacher feedback tied to student submissions
- +Browser-based notation authoring reduces setup friction for new lesson drafts
- +Audio playback is synchronized to the score for quick correctness checks
- –LMS delivery and grade syncing are limited compared with full LMS ecosystems
- –Complex school-wide governance needs extra process rather than built-in controls
- –Advanced adaptive learning paths require manual lesson structure work
- –External automation depends on limited integration depth versus LMS-native stacks
Private music instructors
Assign weekly notation practice
Shorter feedback cycle per student
Small music schools
Run consistent class cohorts
Lower prep time across groups
Show 2 more scenarios
Theory instructors
Grade rhythm and pitch accuracy
Fewer correctness disputes
Students work from synchronized playback tied to the written score.
Curriculum developers
Migrate existing MusicXML materials
Less retyping and re-engraving
Existing authored scores can be imported and repurposed inside new lesson activities.
Best for: Fits when instructors need notation-centered assignments with fast teacher feedback for multiple cohorts.
Flowkey
vertical specialistPiano learning app with interactive sheet music and song library powered by acoustic recognition.
Guided, performance-based feedback during practice that keeps learners aligned to the expected notes and timing.
Flowkey focuses on interactive music-learning lessons built around real-time feedback from a performance input. The core experience combines curated song and exercise content with practice tools like tempo controls, audio playback, and guided progression.
- +Real-time listening feedback during practice for guided correction
- +Song-first lesson design reduces setup time for new learners
- +Tempo and playback controls support repeat practice at fixed speed
- +Progression keeps learners moving from drills to full pieces
- –Instruction depth depends on supported instruments and modes
- –Assessment reporting is thin for formal gradebook workflows
- –Limited admin controls for classroom roster provisioning
- –External LMS interoperability options are not the primary focus
Piano learners
Read notes with on-screen guidance
Better coordination of keys and notes
Beginner musicians
Learn fundamentals within song lessons
Playable pieces supported by basics
Show 2 more scenarios
Self-practicing students
Correct notes and timing during playback
Immediate correction opportunities
Microphone or MIDI detection compares played notes to the lesson so missed notes and timing errors stand out.
Adult independent learners
Maintain progress across practice sessions
Consistent self-paced progress
Lesson sequences and progress records help learners resume unfinished practice and keep routines consistent.
Best for: Fits when instructors want audio-guided practice for keyboard students without heavy LMS integration.
Soundation
SMBBrowser-based music production studio with virtual instruments, loops, and audio recording.
Real-time collaborative recording and sequencing inside the browser-backed studio for group composition projects.
Soundation is a cloud music studio and classroom workspace used to capture, edit, and sequence audio with built-in collaboration. It supports MIDI and audio recording workflows that fit instructor-led composition, plus sharing links that let students submit work for review.
- +Browser-first DAW workflow for recording, overdubbing, and editing without installs
- +Project sharing links support quick student hand-in and teacher review cycles
- +MIDI and sequencing tools fit composition and arrangement assignments
- +Real-time collaboration supports group recording and layered production tasks
- –Assessment and gradebook features are limited compared with LMS-grade tools
- –Curriculum authoring and structured drill content are not a primary focus
Music classroom instructors
Audio-first composing and layer auditioning
Audible feedback during composition
Game audio students
Build loop-based cues for prototypes
Usable music cues exported
Show 2 more scenarios
Student audio producers
Edit recorded audio into mixes
Mix-ready recordings for presentation
Learners revise audio regions, apply effects, automate changes, and balance tracks for review-ready mixes.
Teacher and student reviewers
Share completed work via links
Easier listening and feedback cycles
Creators share completed compositions or exported mixes so instructors and peers can listen and comment.
Best for: Fits when instructors need browser-based music production practice and student submission links.
Hooktheory
vertical specialistInteractive music theory and songwriting platform using popular song analysis.
Theorytab turns functional harmony into an interactive chord-selection practice loop tied to real musical examples.
Hooktheory pairs interactive music-theory learning with composition and analysis workflows in one place. The Theorytab area organizes chords and progressions around functional harmony concepts, then ties them to listenable examples.
- +Theorytab links functional harmony to chord progressions with playable context
- +Interactive composition practice focuses on chord choices rather than note input
- +Learning outputs can be reused for guided classroom assignments
- +Analysis-oriented lessons encourage pattern recognition across songs
- –Chord-focused workflow leaves little room for non-harmonic rhythm practice
- –Progressions and examples require careful guidance for absolute beginners
- –Limited support for notation editing compared with engraving-focused tools
- –Automation and API access are not geared for district-scale integration
Music theory students
Practice functional harmony with feedback
Faster functional harmony accuracy
Songwriters and arrangers
Compose using chord progressions
Progressions tied to sound
Best for: Fits when instructors want chord-progression training and song analysis tied to functional harmony practice.
EarMaster
vertical specialistEar training and sight-singing software with exercises in intervals, chords, scales, and rhythm.
Pitch and rhythm detection with drill scoring produces immediate, objective feedback during ear-training exercises.
EarMaster centers on interactive aural skills drills that score responses against expected pitches and rhythms, which makes it suitable for targeting specific listening objectives. Lesson creation and progression are handled inside the application workflow, with tools for managing exercise sequences and checking results after sessions. MusicXML import supports bringing notated material into listening and performance contexts for students who work from scores.
- +Automatic scoring uses pitch and rhythm detection for immediate feedback
- +Lesson drills cover intervals, chords, scales, and rhythmic dictation
- +MusicXML import supports score-based training workflows
- +Progress tracking ties drill attempts to listening objectives
- –Course delivery features like LMS-style modules are limited
- –Advanced classroom automation depends more on external processes
- –Some curriculum planning requires more manual sequencing in-app
- –Audio-focused training can feel narrow for theory-only instruction
Private instructors
Assign scored interval and chord drills
Clear progress signals per student
Music schools
Remediate rhythmic dictation accuracy
Reduced error rates over time
Show 2 more scenarios
Ensemble directors
Tune section listening before rehearsals
Faster ensemble response
Listening drills reinforce tonal expectations and chord hearing tied to upcoming repertoire.
Theory tutors
Practice score-based listening drills
Targeted practice from repertoire
MusicXML import lets tutors generate listening exercises from notated passages.
Best for: Fits when instructors need frequent scored ear-training drills with fast feedback and score-based inputs.
Musictheory.net
SMBFree online music theory lessons, exercises, and customizable practice tools.
Browser-based ear and reading drills that run in short sessions with instant correctness feedback.
Musictheory.net differentiates itself with a browser-first set of short theory drills focused on intervals, chords, and rhythmic reading rather than video-first lessons. The site provides guided practice loops that test recall and recognition through repeated prompts and immediate feedback.
- +Drill-first flow keeps practice focused on specific theory subskills
- +Immediate feedback helps learners correct responses during the same session
- +MusicXML export-friendly workflows support bringing notation into practice
- –Limited classroom management compared with full LMS learning environments
- –Assessment design is narrower than rubric-based gradebook systems
- –Progress analytics lack the depth schools expect for multi-module curricula
Interval and chord drill students
Train recall with short prompt loops
Stronger recognition through repetition
Notation students and teachers
Use MusicXML-supported theory exercises
Reusable notation-based practice
Best for: Fits when instructors need rapid, repeatable theory drills and quick checks for groups.
Teoria
SMBFree music theory tutorials and interactive ear training exercises.
Curriculum-style lesson sequencing that links student drills to assessable progress without building custom lesson logic.
Teoria turns music theory lessons into a guided learning workflow that mixes interactive exercises with instructor-made content. The core capabilities center on ear training style drills, theory work tied to feedback, and assessment-style progression suitable for classroom pacing.
- +Interactive theory drills provide immediate feedback during practice
- +Cohort progression tracking supports classroom pacing and follow-up
- +Lesson building favors curriculum sequences instead of one-off worksheets
- +Material workflows fit both individual practice and guided instruction
- –Advanced LMS integrations and gradebook sync are limited compared with top LMS-first tools
- –Automation depth is constrained for large district provisioning workflows
- –Exercise variety depends heavily on the authoring workflow quality
- –Media and assignment grading workflows can feel narrower than general education LMSes
Classroom theory instructors
Deliver curriculum-paced guided exercises
Cohort pacing with structured progression
Student ear training learners
Practice with interactive feedback drills
More consistent exercise mastery
Show 1 more scenario
Music schools managing cohorts
Track completion across curriculum sequences
Clear progress across assignments
Administration supports cohort management and tracks student completion within a defined curriculum order.
Best for: Fits when music departments need interactive theory practice, tracking, and structured lesson sequences for enrolled groups.
MusicFirst
vertical specialistCloud-based music education platform bundling notation, ear training, and practice tools for schools.
Automated, rubric-style marking for student responses across notation and aural skills.
MusicFirst delivers assignment-based music education with automated feedback workflows for sight-reading, theory, and ear-skills practice. The system focuses on curriculum-aligned lesson delivery, student submissions, and teacher review inside a classroom roster model.
- +Automated drill marking reduces manual correction time for frequent submissions
- +MusicXML import supports faster migration of existing notation content
- +Lesson and assessment flow fits classroom use with roster-based assignment
- +Practice analytics highlight which exercises drive improvement and which stall
- –Advanced classroom governance depends on consistent roster and assignment hygiene
- –Non-notation workflows need more manual setup when lesson assets vary by teacher
Middle and high school students
Complete practice with automated feedback
More targeted practice attempts
Music teachers with rosters
Review student submissions for accuracy
Review workflow tied to assignments
Show 1 more scenario
Curriculum coordinators
Use MusicXML to reduce lesson rework
Less time recreating notation lessons
Educators import MusicXML so notation-based lessons align with curriculum without rebuilding materials manually.
Best for: Fits when schools need repeatable, teacher-reviewed music drills tied to roster assignments.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 music education software, BandLab stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right Music Education Software
Music education software packages learning activities for notation practice, ear training drills, and guided theory workflows, and this guide covers Noteflight, Flat, and the other tools that lead by classroom usability and instructional feedback loops.
The set focuses on how each platform handles assignment workflows, student response scoring, and review playback, and it highlights where LMS-grade delivery, curriculum sequencing, and classroom governance controls narrow the gap between a lesson app and a school system. The coverage also includes EarMaster, Teachable, Thinkific, and Kajabi to compare instructor-led course delivery against notation-first and drill-first classroom tooling.
The ranking takes into account integration depth, automation and API surface where documented in the product workflow, and admin and governance controls where classroom roster provisioning and assessment management are practical.
Music Education Software for schools and instructors: notation, ear training, and theory drills
Music education software delivers structured learning modules for reading, ear training, and theory work while attaching student attempts to feedback that stays usable for classroom pacing. Many tools also provide content interchange through MusicXML import and export, which matters when teachers move scores between rehearsal tools and lesson platforms.
Noteflight centers on a browser notation editor with score playback linked to assignment sharing and built-in playback review, which supports notation-first composition and listening checks without leaving the score. Flat emphasizes an inline lesson assignment workflow that ties teacher feedback to the same notation content, making it practical for multi-cohort classes where feedback needs to remain attached to each student submission.
Assignment attachment and scoring fidelity across notation and ear training
Music education software only saves time when it keeps student attempts, teacher feedback, and playback evidence linked to the exact activity content students completed. Noteflight and Flat both do this by operating inside a notation-first editor so listening review and feedback stay anchored to the same score view students see.
Notation-first assignment workflow with playback review
Noteflight attaches student work to the notation editor and includes score playback for listening checks inside the same workflow. Flat uses an inline lesson assignment flow that links student attempts and teacher feedback to the same notation content.
Scored ear training with pitch and rhythm detection
EarMaster uses pitch and rhythm detection to produce immediate drill scoring for intervals, chords, scales, and rhythmic dictation. Musictheory.net provides browser-based ear and reading drills with instant correctness feedback during short sessions.
Automated, rubric-style marking across frequent submissions
MusicFirst applies automated, rubric-style marking for student responses across notation and aural skills to reduce manual correction time. Noteflight prioritizes assignment sharing inside the notation editor instead of relying on heavy rubric automation for marking.
Guided practice feedback during performance attempts
Flowkey delivers real-time listening feedback during practice that targets expected notes and timing. BandLab focuses on collaborative remixing in shared projects, which changes the feedback loop from drill scoring to peer and teacher iteration.
Collaborative recording and student remix workflows
BandLab supports browser-based recording and editing in shared projects that enable peer review and teacher feedback loops in one workspace. Soundation provides browser-first recording, overdubbing, and sequencing with project sharing links for student submission and teacher review.
Cross-tool score interchange via MusicXML
Noteflight supports MusicXML import and export so teachers can reuse scores across rehearsal and lesson tools. Flat also supports MusicXML import and export for moving existing scores into lessons.
Choose by the work product teachers need to grade and the automation boundary they can manage
Music education software selection should start with the unit of work that must be graded. Notation-first assignment tools like Noteflight and Flat attach feedback to score content, while drill-first tools like EarMaster and Musictheory.net return correctness during the practice attempt.
Map the graded artifact to the editor a student uses
If the graded artifact is a score students edit and play back, Noteflight fits because it keeps assignment sharing and playback review inside the notation editor. If the graded artifact is a score-based submission tied to inline feedback across cohorts, Flat fits because the assignment review workflow keeps teacher feedback attached to student attempts on the same notation content.
Pick scoring latency based on whether practice needs immediate correctness
If practice requires immediate objective feedback during the attempt, EarMaster uses pitch and rhythm detection to score drills as students respond. If short, fast correctness checks for ear and reading subskills are the priority, Musictheory.net runs browser drills with instant feedback during each response.
Decide whether grading should be rubric-automation driven or teacher-marked
If grading volume is high and repeatable marking is the goal, MusicFirst uses automated, rubric-style marking across notation and aural skills to reduce manual correction time. If the priority is teacher feedback tied to notation content rather than automated rubric marking, Noteflight and Flat keep the workflow centered on assignment playback and review.
Choose the practice loop: listening-guided performance or classroom collaboration
If learners need audio-guided correction that stays aligned to expected notes and timing, Flowkey provides real-time listening feedback during practice. If the course emphasizes student recording, remixing, and peer review on shared artifacts, BandLab or Soundation fits because both support browser studio collaboration with project sharing links.
Set expectations for assessment and gradebook depth
If formal gradebook workflows and curriculum-grade assessment require more than thin reporting, avoid relying on tools where assessment reporting is described as thin or limited. Flowkey and Soundation focus more on guided practice and project hand-ins, while MusicFirst and rubric-style marking are more aligned to structured drill submissions.
Plan content migration based on whether MusicXML reuse is required
If existing scores must move into lessons with minimal re-entry, Noteflight and Flat both support MusicXML import and export. If course design relies more on interactive drills and progress tracking than migrating notation libraries, Teoria and other drill-first tools align better to sequencing and tracking rather than score interchange.
Who benefits from each software style
Music schools and instructors should align the platform style to lesson delivery patterns and grading practices. Notation-first platforms serve teachers who need student submissions that remain reviewable inside the score view, while drill-first platforms serve instructors who need frequent scored practice with immediate correctness.
Notation-first composition and rehearsal instructors
Noteflight and Flat keep student work inside a browser notation editor with playback or inline feedback tied to the same notation content for review.
Ear training programs that require fast, scored drills
EarMaster and Musictheory.net focus on immediate scoring during practice sessions so correctness feedback arrives without a separate grading pass.
Schools scaling practice marking across many submissions
MusicFirst reduces manual correction time by applying automated, rubric-style marking across notation and aural skills tied to roster assignments.
Keyboard instructors who run guided practice rather than LMS-heavy grading
Flowkey provides real-time listening feedback during practice and keeps lesson setup lighter than platforms designed for structured gradebook workflows.
Classes built around student remixing and shared production projects
BandLab and Soundation emphasize browser-based recording, collaboration, and submission links so peer and teacher review can happen inside the same project workspace.
Common mismatches that create extra work for teachers
The most frequent failure mode is selecting software for drill scoring when the classroom needs structured assessment and rubric-grade reporting. Another common failure mode is choosing social production collaboration when the primary job is graded correctness across theory and ear training responses.
Expecting DAW-grade audio mixing controls from notation-first platforms.
Noteflight is centered on notation editing and playback review, so audio mixing and DAW-grade controls should not be treated as a core classroom requirement.
Building a gradebook workflow around a tool with thin formal assessment reporting.
Flowkey and Soundation emphasize guided practice and project hand-ins, so assessment and gradebook depth may not match LMS-grade grading needs.
Relying on drill tools for LMS-style module delivery and classroom automation.
EarMaster and Musictheory.net focus on ear and reading drills with scoring and quick feedback, so LMS-style module delivery and deep automation require separate handling.
Choosing collaboration-first software for structured rubric assessments.
BandLab and Soundation support shared projects and peer feedback loops, but they provide limited control for curriculum-grade rubrics and structured assessments.
Assuming course delivery and grade syncing match full LMS ecosystems for inline lesson platforms.
Flat supports inline lesson assignments with teacher feedback tied to student submissions, but LMS delivery and grade syncing are described as limited compared with full LMS ecosystems.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Noteflight, Flat, and the other tools in this set by features, ease, and value, then used those scores to guide category fit for music education workflows. Features accounted for 40% of the final emphasis by prioritizing assignment attachment, scoring mechanics, and score playback review tied to student attempts.
Ease and value each accounted for 30% by weighting browser workflow speed and how directly teachers can run classroom activities without extra manual steps. Noteflight placed highest because its browser notation editor plus assignment-oriented score sharing keeps playback review inside the score, and its MusicXML import and export supports cross-tool score reuse.
Frequently Asked Questions About Music Education Software
How do Noteflight and Flat handle MusicXML import when assigning student work?
Which tools support performance-driven feedback using pitch or timing detection instead of manual review?
When do schools prefer BandLab over a notation-first tool like Noteflight for classroom projects?
What breaks if an assessment workflow depends on inline rubric marking rather than lesson-linked feedback?
How does Musictheory.net compare to EarMaster for building repeatable group drills?
Which tools provide curriculum sequencing and completion tracking suitable for cohort management?
How do integrations and content portability workflows differ between Hooktheory and Noteflight?
Where does administrator control usually fall short when moving from LMS-only delivery to a classroom roster workflow?
What technical setup issues can appear when using tools that expect interactive input devices?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Funding and competing interests
This study was co-funded by several of the vendors assessed in it. No single vendor funded it. Funders could propose the market studied.
They had no role in selecting vendors, setting or weighting criteria, analysing data or drawing conclusions, and they received the same factual-accuracy check as every other vendor assessed.
Market definition, inclusion rules and criteria weights were fixed by an editor before research began and did not change afterwards. Editorial process →
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Education Learning alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of education learning tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare education learning tools→