GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
MediaTop 10 Best Multi Camera Production Software of 2026
Ranking of multi camera production software tools by features for different production needs, with vMix, Wirecast, OBS Studio, and Streamlabs covered.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Streamlabs Desktop is the best fit for creators who want one desktop workflow for multi-webcam setups with overlays and reliable scene switching, while vMix is the strong alternative for Windows live teams needing replay, graphics, and programmable control; choose OBS Studio if you need a flexible free entry.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Streamlabs Desktop
Creator widgets place alerts, chat, goals, donation events, and overlays directly inside scene layouts.
Built for fits when creators need multiple webcams, capture cards, overlays, and multistream output in one desktop workflow..
vMix
Editor pickvMix Replay provides multi-angle instant replay, slow motion, clip tagging, and direct replay control inside the production interface.
Built for fits when live teams need a Windows switcher with replay, graphics, remote guests, and programmable control..
Ecamm Live
Editor pickInterview mode combines browser guests, branded scene layouts, comments, and local production controls in one live workspace.
Built for fits when Mac-based creators need polished multi-camera shows with remote guests and repeatable branded scenes..
Related reading
Comparison Table
Streamlabs Desktop
creatorDesktop streaming software with scene switching, guest support, and source management for creator-oriented multi-camera setups.
Creator widgets place alerts, chat, goals, donation events, and overlays directly inside scene layouts.
Multiple webcams, capture cards, display captures, browser sources, and media files can share a scene. Scene collections, source filters, transitions, hotkeys, and recording settings support separate podcast, gaming, and event layouts. Alerts, chatbot commands, event goals, donation labels, and stream overlays are configured inside the same workspace.
Multistream output and a virtual camera suit creators distributing one production to several services or video applications. Native PTZ control, SDI workflow, and ISO recording are not provided. That limitation affects studios that need isolated camera files, hardware camera movement, or broadcast routing.
Streamlabs Desktop fits solo creators and small production teams that prioritize audience tools over dedicated switcher hardware. Automation centers on hotkeys, scene transitions, source visibility, and chatbot commands rather than extensive macro programming. The interface reduces setup time for recurring shows but requires manual organization as scenes and sources multiply.
- +Integrated alerts, widgets, chatbot, and event tools reduce external overlay dependencies.
- +Multistream output supports simultaneous distribution across several connected destinations.
- +Scene collections preserve separate layouts for different shows.
- +Hotkeys and source visibility controls support repeatable camera changes.
- –Broadcast hardware integration remains limited for complex studio productions.
- –API and automation coverage is narrower than dedicated switchers.
- –Complex productions require manual scene and source organization.
- –Advanced audio routing lacks the depth of broadcast-focused applications.
Streaming creators
Multi-camera gaming broadcasts
Consistent live layouts
Podcast production teams
Remote guest interview shows
Repeatable interview production
Show 1 more scenario
Small event teams
Community event livestreams
One-feed event distribution
Multistream output distributes one composed feed while overlays carry schedules and audience prompts.
Best for: Fits when creators need multiple webcams, capture cards, overlays, and multistream output in one desktop workflow.
More related reading
vMix
SMBWindows live production software for multi-camera switching, recording, streaming, replay, and graphics.
vMix Replay provides multi-angle instant replay, slow motion, clip tagging, and direct replay control inside the production interface.
For crews producing weekly sports, worship, education, or corporate broadcasts, vMix supports configurations ranging from several USB sources to larger capture-card and IP-based systems. vMix includes custom monitoring views, layered titles, keying, audio mixing, recording profiles, and multiple destination outputs. Its HTTP API, shortcut system, scripting support, and web controller provide macro automation beyond mouse-driven operation.
Configuration takes time because each input, title, audio bus, shortcut, and output can carry independent settings. A regional sports crew can use replay for live review and clips, but sustained recording requires fast storage and sufficient capture bandwidth. Windows-only deployment limits workstation choice for teams using mixed operating systems.
- +vMix Replay handles multi-angle review, slow motion, tagging, and clip output.
- +Native input support includes NDI feeds, SRT streams, capture cards, and virtual sources.
- +HTTP API, shortcuts, scripting, and web controller support external production control.
- +GT title designer supports reusable graphics and data-fed templates.
- –Windows-only deployment excludes macOS and Linux production workstations.
- –Advanced configurations require substantial input, audio, graphics, and shortcut setup.
- –High-end replay and recording workflows require dedicated capture and storage capacity.
- –Remote guest quality depends on network conditions and participant hardware.
sports broadcast teams
live match replay and highlights
Faster on-air replay
worship production teams
multi-camera weekly services
Consistent weekly broadcasts
Show 1 more scenario
corporate event crews
hybrid conference production
Coordinated hybrid sessions
vMix combines presenters, slides, remote guests, branded scenes, and simultaneous destination outputs.
Best for: Fits when live teams need a Windows switcher with replay, graphics, remote guests, and programmable control.
Ecamm Live
creatorMac live streaming and production software with support for multiple cameras, overlays, interviews, and local recording.
Interview mode combines browser guests, branded scene layouts, comments, and local production controls in one live workspace.
Ecamm Live fits creators and small production teams using USB cameras, HDMI capture devices, microphones, and Mac hardware. Its scene editor supports layered graphics, animated overlays, screen sharing, video clips, comments, and audio controls. Stream Deck, MIDI, keyboard shortcuts, and remote control options provide practical operation during live sessions.
The main tradeoff is limited coverage for broadcast infrastructure that depends on SDI, genlock, or dedicated control-room hardware. A marketing team can still produce an interview show with two cameras, remote guests, branded lower thirds, and simultaneous platform outputs from one Mac. Larger studios may need vMix or Wirecast for deeper routing, hardware integration, and multi-operator control.
- +Mac-native interface reduces setup time for camera switching and scene preparation
- +Browser-based guest interviews avoid guest software installation
- +Scene editor combines cameras, overlays, media, screens, and audio controls
- +Virtual camera output works with video meetings and webinar applications
- –Mac-only deployment excludes Windows-based production workstations
- –Limited support for SDI-centered broadcast infrastructure
- –Automation relies mainly on shortcuts, MIDI, Stream Deck, and remote controls
- –Advanced multi-operator workflows are less developed than in larger broadcast applications
Small video production teams
Multi-camera interview broadcasts
Consistent interview production
Marketing and communications teams
Executive webinar production
Controlled branded webinars
Show 2 more scenarios
Independent content creators
Live shows from home
Lower production complexity
Creators connect USB cameras, microphones, screen shares, and media sources without installing dedicated production hardware.
Remote training teams
Interactive software demonstrations
Clearer remote instruction
Presenters combine webcam views, application screens, guest speakers, and visual annotations during live instruction.
Best for: Fits when Mac-based creators need polished multi-camera shows with remote guests and repeatable branded scenes.
OBS Studio
creatorFree open source streaming and recording software that supports multi-source scene switching for multi-camera workflows.
Lua scripting plus plugin sources lets custom scene logic drive routing, overlays, and hotkey macros across outputs.
OBS Studio is a free, open-source multi-camera production app built around a modular scene and source graph. Multi-camera switching comes from scene switching and nested scene composition, while program output is driven by render targets and compositing pipelines.
It supports live mixing of audio and video sources, plus recording and streaming outputs with per-output configuration and reusable profiles. Camera control and automation are handled through sources, scripts, and plugin extensibility rather than a dedicated switching controller interface.
- +Scene and source graph supports nested layouts for fast multi-camera switching
- +NVIDIA NVENC, AMD AMF, and Intel QSV encoders cover common streaming needs
- +Extensible with plugins and Lua scripts for custom routing and overlays
- +Per-output recording and streaming settings reduce manual retuning
- –PTZ control and tally management require add-ons or custom workflows
- –Switching macros are less structured than purpose-built switching controllers
- –Genlock synchronization and frame-accurate timing need external discipline
- –Scaling to many synchronized cameras can become configuration-heavy
Best for: Fits when teams need flexible scene composition for multi-camera live switching and recording without a proprietary MCS.
SplitCam
creatorStreaming and video splitting software that can combine multiple video sources for live broadcasts and calls.
Virtual camera fan-out, where multiple program compositions can be exposed as separate camera devices for different downstream tools.
SplitCam runs as multi-source capture software that mixes multiple camera feeds into one output for live switching and recording. It focuses on virtual camera routing so one hardware input can be shared into software tools that only accept a single webcam device.
It supports multi-input layouts, audio routing, and device mapping for repeatable source selection during live production. It also provides extensibility through virtual camera outputs that can feed NDI-style workflows and downstream live mixing chains.
- +Creates multiple virtual camera outputs from one capture session
- +Quick camera input mapping for fast live source selection
- +Multi-view layouts for previewing several feeds at once
- +Audio routing keeps program audio aligned with chosen sources
- –Switching features are lighter than dedicated broadcast switchers
- –Advanced synchronization controls are limited compared with pro ecosystems
- –PTZ workflows depend on external control paths, not integrated control
- –Complex automation needs external tools and scripting
Best for: Fits when small studios need multi-camera capture routing into existing streaming apps.
FFsplit
creatorWindows live production software for real-time capture, mixing, encoding, and broadcasting from multiple sources.
Tally management tied into the operator switching workflow to reduce misroutes during live multi-camera operations.
FFsplit targets multi-camera switching workflows with a focus on practical live mixing, preview layouts, and source routing inside a single operator app. It supports NDI-based camera and signal ingestion plus SDI-oriented workflows through hardware capture when the system provides compatible inputs.
The software centers around configurable input mapping, program out switching, and session-style reuse of setups for recurring productions. For productions that need ISO-style parallel recording, tally cues, and repeatable audio-video routing, FFsplit can reduce operator overhead when the workstation is configured correctly.
- +Fast operator workflow for program out switching with clear preview control
- +NDI pipeline support simplifies camera input mapping across devices
- +Session reuse supports repeatable setups for recurring shows
- +Tally management keeps live switching safer in multi-person operations
- –PTZ control support depends on camera integration and driver availability
- –Audio follow video and latency tuning require careful workstation configuration
- –Hardware control surface integration is limited to supported device profiles
- –Complex multiviewer layouts take more manual setup than some competitors
Best for: Fits when teams run NDI-heavy live mixing and need repeatable session setups without heavy engineering.
Switcher Studio
vertical specialistMobile-first multi-camera video production software for live streaming and recording with iPhone and iPad inputs.
Operator session recall that restores routing and show actions for consistent switching across repeat broadcasts.
Switcher Studio is a multi-camera switching app with tight iPad-centric control for live production, including program and preview workflow. It focuses on camera input mapping and switching logic that works with supported capture pipelines, rather than a general-purpose broadcast studio tool.
The app provides session-based control of sources, overlays, and media so operators can recall the same rundown behavior for repeated shows. For teams that already use networked A/V pipelines, Switcher Studio prioritizes connection stability and operator-friendly routing controls.
- +Fast iPad operator workflow for switching, overlays, and media playback
- +Session recall keeps source routing and rundown behavior consistent
- +Built-in tally and preview workflow reduces operator guesswork
- +Macro-style repeat actions simplify common transitions during shows
- –PTZ control coverage depends on specific supported devices and protocols
- –Complex signal chains need extra routing work outside the app
- –Advanced studio tooling lags dedicated desktop ecosystems for heavy production
- –Live encoder and decklink-centric recording workflows require careful pipeline setup
Best for: Fits when small production teams need quick switching and repeatable sessions with an operator-first control surface.
Lightstream Studio
SMBBrowser-based live production software with scene switching, remote guests, and support for multi-source streaming layouts.
Studio session recall that preserves camera mappings and scene composition for consistent multi-operator shows.
Lightstream Studio targets multi-camera production workflows with a session-based mixing and recording pipeline for live program output and captured timelines. It provides camera input mapping, source routing, and real-time scene composition with per-source overlays and transitions.
Control and automation depend on its integration surface and configurable studio layouts, which matter when multiple operators manage consistent shows. Compared with vMix, Wirecast, and OBS Studio, the differentiator is Lightstream’s studio-centric workflow design for repeatable session recall rather than general desktop capture orientation.
- +Session-based studio workflow supports repeatable show setup and recall
- +Camera input mapping and source routing handle mixed live and preplanned sources
- +Real-time scene composition with overlays enables consistent program graphics
- +Integration options support automation-style control for multi-operator operations
- –Advanced hardware workflows require careful pipeline planning before production days
- –PTZ control depth and tally management capabilities can be limited by integration coverage
Best for: Fits when repeatable multi-camera sessions need consistent routing, overlays, and operator workflows.
StreamYard
SMBBrowser-based live video studio that switches between multiple camera sources and guests.
Link-based guest joining with live-ready source control, so remote participants can be added or swapped mid-session.
StreamYard handles multi-camera live switching for browser-based production, with real-time previews and a simple scene workflow. Camera and media inputs map into a live mix that supports overlays like lower thirds, custom backgrounds, and chroma key style cutouts.
It also manages guest workflows with link-based joining so shows can add and remove remote participants during a session without rebuilding the production plan. StreamYard emphasizes streaming output as the primary target, while deeper studio-style recording and hardware control stay limited versus dedicated broadcast suites.
- +Browser-first multi-camera switching with consistent preview-to-program flow
- +Guest joining via links reduces pre-session coordination for live shows
- +Lower-third and overlay controls work during live mixing without scene reloading
- +Session layout handling fits multistream shows with fewer technical steps
- –Limited support for SDI workflows and direct decklink capture
- –Macros and automation are less granular than desktop broadcast control systems
- –PTZ control and genlock synchronization are not designed for hardware timing stacks
- –Advanced routing and recording profiles are less flexible for ISO workflows
Best for: Fits when live interviews and remote guests need fast switching and consistent overlays.
Evmux
SMBLive event production studio supporting multiple video sources, scenes, and graphics.
Macro-driven session recall for switching, routing, and overlay state changes during multi-camera shows.
Evmux targets multi-camera production teams that need a controlled switching and routing workflow with repeatable session behavior. The software focuses on live multi-source mixing, synchronized playout, and session-based control for switching, preview, and output routing.
Operational value comes from automation support around scene and source changes, plus a connected workflow for external control and pipeline integration. Evmux is most compelling when the production needs consistent macros and predictable behavior across shows.
- +Session-style control makes repeated shows more consistent than freeform mixing
- +External control options reduce reliance on manual panel operations during switching
- +Multi-input routing supports predictable source mapping across sessions
- +Automation-friendly workflow helps standardize scene and transition behavior
- –Advanced routing setups can require careful configuration of input and output mappings
- –Limited visibility into timing and sync health can slow diagnosis during live issues
Best for: Fits when broadcast operators need repeatable multi-camera switching sessions with automation and external control.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 media, Streamlabs Desktop stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right multi camera production software
Multi camera production software covers live switching, multi-source routing, and program and recording outputs from a single operator workspace. This guide covers Streamlabs Desktop, vMix, and OBS Studio alongside eight other tools chosen for how they handle preview-to-program control, scene or input mapping, and operator workflows.
Teams running multiple webcams, capture cards, and multistream outputs often look first at Streamlabs Desktop, which places creator alerts, chat widgets, and overlays inside scene layouts. Teams that need Windows-native live switching with built-in multi-angle replay and clip tagging often start with vMix. Teams that require scriptable routing and custom macros across outputs often start with OBS Studio using Lua scripting and plugin sources.
Multi camera production software for live switching, program out, and repeatable show control
Multi camera production software connects camera and signal inputs into a controlled source graph so operators can route preview, tally-managed program output, and recording streams with consistent scene or switcher state. It also supports repeatable show runs through session recall or macro-driven automation so reruns rebuild the same camera mappings and overlay behavior without rebuilding the entire setup.
Streamlabs Desktop targets multi-input creator studios by combining webcam and capture workflows with built-in alert and overlay widgets inside the same scene system. vMix targets production teams on Windows by pairing multi-input live switching with vMix Replay for multi-angle instant replay and clip tagging inside the production interface. OBS Studio targets flexible operators by combining nested scene composition with encoder options and scriptable scene logic via Lua.
Multi camera control features that change on-air outcomes
Preview-to-program control determines how reliably the right camera and graphics land on program out during fast operator switching. Multi-camera production software also has to keep recording and streaming outputs aligned with the same routing and scene state so reruns and later edits reflect the on-air decisions.
Scene and source mapping speed for multi-input shows
Streamlabs Desktop mixes creator-style scenes with widget-driven layouts for routing webcams, capture sources, and overlays inside one interface. OBS Studio uses a nested scene and source graph so teams can build reusable compositions for multi-camera switching without a proprietary switcher workflow.
Operator workflows for program out switching and repeatability
Switcher Studio centers switching around an operator-first iPad workflow and uses session recall to restore routing and show actions. Lightstream Studio also uses studio session recall to preserve camera mappings and scene composition so repeat multi-operator shows behave consistently.
Replay and clip control inside the production operator interface
vMix includes vMix Replay with multi-angle instant replay, slow motion, clip tagging, and direct replay control. Streamlabs Desktop and OBS Studio focus more on live switching and recording/stream output configuration than on an operator-led replay pipeline.
NDI pipeline handling for camera and device mapping
FFsplit supports an NDI pipeline that simplifies camera input mapping across devices for NDI-heavy live mixing. vMix also supports multiple native input types including NDI feeds, SRT streams, capture cards, and virtual sources.
Guest and interview workflows that change scene building patterns
Ecamm Live uses an Interview mode that combines browser guests, branded scene layouts, comments, and local production controls. StreamYard uses link-based guest joining so remote participants can be added or swapped mid-session without guest software installation.
Session automation for switching, routing, and overlay state changes
Evmux provides macro-driven session recall for switching, routing, and overlay state changes in repeated multi-camera shows. OBS Studio uses Lua scripting plus plugin sources so custom scene logic and hotkey macros can drive routing and overlay behavior across outputs.
How to choose multi camera production software by operating model
Choice should start with how operators build and change state during a show. Some tools assume a creator studio layout workflow and widget-driven overlays. Others assume a Windows production switcher workflow with replay and programmable control.
Select the workstation model: creator desktop, production switcher, or scriptable routing
Streamlabs Desktop targets multi-webcam creator studios with integrated alerts and widgets embedded in scene layouts. vMix targets Windows production teams that need replay and programmable control inside one operator interface, while OBS Studio targets flexible routing where nested scenes and Lua scripting define behavior.
Match guest workflow to your show cadence
Ecamm Live uses browser-based guest interviews inside the same live workspace so branded scene layouts stay repeatable across interview shows. StreamYard emphasizes link-based guest joining and live-ready source control, which fits sessions where guests must be added or swapped mid-show.
Pick repeatability via session recall versus macro-driven automation
Switcher Studio restores source routing and show actions through operator session recall, which suits teams running repeat broadcasts with an iPad control surface. Evmux uses macro-driven session recall for routing and overlay state changes, which suits operators who want automation of show steps beyond manual panel switching.
Choose the input ecosystem that matches capture hardware and networks
If the production relies heavily on NDI device mapping, FFsplit focuses on an NDI pipeline for simplified camera input routing across devices. vMix includes broad native input support such as NDI feeds, SRT streams, capture cards, and virtual sources, which reduces glue-work for mixed signal chains.
Decide whether replay control is a core requirement or an add-on concern
If multi-angle instant replay and clip tagging must be controlled inside the same production interface, vMix Replay provides slow motion, tagging, and replay control. If replay is not central, tools like Streamlabs Desktop and OBS Studio can focus on scene building and output routing without forcing a replay pipeline into the control workflow.
Account for switching-controller gaps like PTZ and tally coverage
OBS Studio can require add-ons or custom workflows for PTZ control and tally management, which shifts governance to configuration and integration work. Streamlabs Desktop and Ecamm Live also have different hardware integration limits, so camera control and tally behavior should be validated against the target equipment before standardizing the workflow.
Who multi camera production software is built for
Different tools assume different operator roles. Some assume desktop creators who need overlays, alerts, and chat widgets directly in the switching canvas. Others assume production teams who manage Windows capture workflows, replay, and complex input ecosystems.
Creator studios running multiple webcams and overlay-heavy shows
Streamlabs Desktop fits creator workflows because it places alerts, chat widgets, goals, donation events, and overlays directly inside scene layouts while supporting multistream output across several connected destinations.
Windows production teams that need replay alongside switching
vMix fits live teams that need a Windows-native production switcher plus vMix Replay for multi-angle instant replay, slow motion, and clip tagging under operator control.
Mac-based interview hosts who want browser guest workflows
Ecamm Live fits Mac-based shows because Interview mode combines browser guests, branded scene layouts, comments, and local production controls without requiring guest software installation.
Teams building custom routing logic and macros across outputs
OBS Studio fits operators who need scripted behavior because Lua scripting and plugin sources can drive routing, overlays, and hotkey macros across outputs.
Small multi-operator teams that replay the same show rundown
Lightstream Studio supports studio session recall to preserve camera mappings and scene composition, which reduces rework when operator hands off a repeatable multi-operator session.
Common failure modes when standardizing multi camera production software
Multi-camera control failures usually show up as mismatched state between what the operator previews and what program out outputs, or as timing and device-integration issues that only appear under live load. Another frequent issue is picking a tool that is strong at scene composition but thin on the hardware control workflow needed for camera transport control and tally behavior.
Selecting a tool for its scene layouts but underestimating PTZ and tally integration work
OBS Studio requires add-ons or custom workflows for PTZ control and tally management, so camera control readiness should be validated alongside switching rehearsals before committing to an operator SOP.
Assuming guest workflows will match studio integration needs without checking the join method
StreamYard uses link-based guest joining, while Ecamm Live uses browser-based guest interviews with local production controls, so the pre-session coordination and guest device constraints can differ sharply.
Building complex signal chains without planning the input ecosystem and routing approach
Evmux routing can require careful configuration of input and output mappings in advanced setups, so route diagrams should be created before production days.
Expecting replay control to be equally first-class across every switcher-like tool
vMix provides vMix Replay with multi-angle instant replay, slow motion, clip tagging, and replay control in the production UI, while other tools in this category often emphasize switching and encoding rather than a built-in replay pipeline.
Choosing a lightweight switching workflow and then needing deeper broadcast hardware integration
Streamlabs Desktop has limited broadcast hardware integration for complex studio productions, so decklink-style workflows and advanced external control requirements should be checked against the target capture stack.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Streamlabs Desktop, vMix, OBS Studio, and eight other multi camera production tools on feature depth and operator workflow mechanics. Features accounted for 40% of scoring because the evaluation focused on scene or source graph control, multistream output behavior, and how replay or guest workflows operate inside the production interface.
Ease and value each accounted for 30% because the evaluation measured setup friction for multi-input mapping and the effort required to keep switching macros or session recall reliable across repeats. Streamlabs Desktop placed first because creator widgets and integrated alerts can be embedded directly inside scene layouts while supporting multistream output across several connected destinations, which reduces external overlay dependencies compared with tools that require more custom scene logic.
Frequently Asked Questions About multi camera production software
How does vMix handle multi-angle replay compared with OBS Studio and Wirecast-style workflows?
Which tools support camera switching while also managing ISO-style recording and predictable routing in one operator workflow?
How do OBS Studio and Ecamm Live approach remote guests during a live multi-camera session?
When is NDI-based routing a deciding factor, and how do vMix, OBS Studio, and FFsplit differ in practice?
What breaks if an operator needs session recall across multiple shows but the workflow depends on desktop capture rather than studio switching?
How do SplitCam and Evmux differ when the goal is virtual camera routing into downstream tools?
Where does Switcher Studio fall short compared with vMix for complex production features like replay and programmable control?
How do macro automation and session behavior differ between Evmux and Lightstream Studio for repeat broadcasts?
Which tool best fits security-focused production environments that require controlled access and auditable operator actions?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Media alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of media tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare media tools→