GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Communication MediaTop 10 Best Live Tv Streaming Software of 2026
Ranked live tv streaming software for streaming live channels, encoder workflows, and platform fit, including Castr, Wowza, and Brightcove.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Castr is the go-to live TV streaming choice for mid-size media teams that want browser-based publishing with low overhead, whereas Wowza fits when you need more controlled infrastructure headend workflows with custom ingest, packaging, and DRM outputs.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Castr
Event-centric stream management that pairs encoder ingest with ready-to-embed playback configuration for each live session.
Built for fits when mid-size media teams need browser live streaming with low publish overhead..
Wowza
Editor pickServer-side multi-DRM wrapper handling tied to configurable live packaging and output policies.
Built for fits when teams need controlled live headend workflows with custom ingest, packaging, and DRM output policies..
Brightcove
Editor pickBrightcove API and automation patterns for programmatic live channel configuration and publish-state synchronization.
Built for fits when media teams need governed live channel workflows with API automation and managed playback outputs..
Related reading
Comparison Table
Castr
SMBLive streaming software with multistreaming, scheduled channels, browser-based studio, and OTT delivery features.
Event-centric stream management that pairs encoder ingest with ready-to-embed playback configuration for each live session.
Castr’s core workflow centers on creating a live stream, connecting an encoder ingest, and generating playback that works in standard web players. The managed pipeline handles packaging for browser delivery and provides playback controls for live sessions, which reduces the need for custom headend components. Event operations can manage multiple live entries with consistent player configuration through channel and embed settings.
A tradeoff appears in complex enterprise publishing designs that require fine-grained transcoding ladder control and custom DRM packaging chains. Castr fits best when the streaming team wants a streamlined publish workflow and predictable browser playback rather than building encoder and packager topologies from scratch.
- +Managed packaging converts encoder ingest into browser-ready playback
- +Multi-stream event management keeps publish workflows consistent
- +Custom domains and embeddable players reduce front-end rewrites
- +Clear stream lifecycle controls support repeatable live operations
- –Limited visibility into transcoding ladder tuning
- –Advanced multi-DRM wrapper workflows require external tooling
- –Granular stream health telemetry for large estates is not built around deep analytics
- –Encoder integration options can feel narrow for bespoke ingest chains
media ops teams
Publish recurring live events quickly
Fewer publishing mistakes
community organizers
Run consistent web-based watch pages
Lower web development load
Show 2 more scenarios
training and webinars teams
Deliver live sessions to browser viewers
Faster time to publish
Managed delivery reduces infrastructure work for live streaming to common devices.
sports production crews
Manage multiple channels per event
More reliable channel operations
Channel and event lifecycle controls help coordinate parallel streams and player endpoints.
Best for: Fits when mid-size media teams need browser live streaming with low publish overhead.
More related reading
Wowza
infrastructureStreaming infrastructure software for live channel ingest, transcoding, low-latency delivery, and OTT workflows.
Server-side multi-DRM wrapper handling tied to configurable live packaging and output policies.
Wowza centers on running streaming server software that can sit close to encoder ingest for low-overhead distribution and consistent stream behavior. It supports common encoder paths like RTMP and SRT ingest patterns, and it can drive HLS and MPEG-DASH outputs for multiscreen playback. For governance, it exposes management interfaces for stream lifecycle control and operational monitoring, which matters for headend virtualization and multi-channel operations. Wowza’s value increases when workflows require custom routing between multiple inputs, outputs, and playback tiers.
A tradeoff is that Wowza is more configuration-heavy than pure managed live streaming services, especially when building multi-DRM wrapper setups, multi-output ladders, and channel failover rules. It fits well when an engineering team already owns encoder workflows and wants to control the full live pipeline from ingest to packaging and playback. It can be overkill for simple channel publishing where a minimal configuration path and fewer moving parts are the primary requirement.
- +Configurable ingest-to-output pipeline for multi-channel live distribution
- +HLS and MPEG-DASH outputs with server-side transcoding control
- +Multi-DRM playback integration support for controlled viewing
- +Operational controls for stream lifecycle and failover scenarios
- –Higher configuration effort for complex packaging and policy rules
- –Advanced workflows require closer ops ownership and tighter monitoring
- –Encoder workflow alignment is necessary for stable end-to-end latency
- –Some enterprise governance features depend on deployment choices
Media engineering teams
Run multi-channel origin and packaging
Consistent playback across channels
Broadcast operations
Failover orchestration for live ingest
Reduced unplanned downtime
Show 2 more scenarios
Streaming platform teams
Multi-DRM playback for paywalled apps
Device-appropriate protected playback
Integrate DRM wrappers with output policy so player playback stays controlled across devices.
OTT content operators
Custom time-shifted experiences
More flexible viewer replays
Use server-driven workflows to support start-over and related time-shifted playback needs.
Best for: Fits when teams need controlled live headend workflows with custom ingest, packaging, and DRM output policies.
Brightcove
enterpriseEnterprise video platform for live event streaming, linear channels, monetization, and app distribution.
Brightcove API and automation patterns for programmatic live channel configuration and publish-state synchronization.
Brightcove Live centers on live channel setup plus player-ready delivery outputs, with operational controls for platform admins and content teams. The delivery workflow is geared toward adaptive bitrate packaging and multi-format playback, while Brightcove Studio and Video Cloud components support the surrounding media operations. The platform’s integration depth shows through extensive REST APIs and webhook-style event patterns that enable automated channel provisioning and publish-state synchronization.
A key tradeoff is that Brightcove’s strongest fit is platform-led publishing, so teams that want full custom CDN edge behavior often need external infrastructure. Brightcove is well suited to organizations running multiple live channels with shared governance rules, such as newsroom operations and sports content groups. It is less ideal for teams that only need a minimal player with no admin, workflow automation, or event-driven orchestration.
- +API-driven channel provisioning for repeatable live publishing workflows
- +Role-based permissions for separating admin and editorial duties
- +Event and status visibility for automating ingest and playback readiness
- +Managed playback outputs reduce custom player and CDN glue work
- –Custom edge logic needs external CDN or origin control components
- –Live workflow setup can be heavier than player-only providers
- –Advanced ad and signaling workflows require careful configuration
- –Operational complexity grows with multi-team governance boundaries
Media operations teams
Automate multi-channel live publish workflows
Fewer manual launch steps
Enterprise governance teams
Control access across editors and admins
Reduced permission errors
Show 2 more scenarios
Sports broadcasters
Run regional live channels
More consistent channel operations
Shared playback configuration supports consistent viewer experience across multiple events.
Digital ad operations
Coordinate live ad signaling
Better ad insertion coordination
Server-side workflow integration supports timed ad markers and program metadata updates.
Best for: Fits when media teams need governed live channel workflows with API automation and managed playback outputs.
Muvi
OTT platformWhite-label OTT software for launching live TV, video subscriptions, FAST channels, and branded apps.
Studio-style publishing workflows that tie live channel schedules to OTT storefront catalogs and player access control.
Muvi targets live and time-shifted viewing with an OTT storefront plus publishing workflows for multicast-style channel management. The product distinguishes itself through a studio-to-player content pipeline that supports channel catalogs, schedules, and player distribution across web and mobile apps.
Muvi’s governance focus shows up in admin roles for channel operations and content lifecycle controls that reduce accidental broadcast changes. The platform also adds integration depth through SDKs, webhooks, and API-driven provisioning patterns for stream sources and playback entitlements.
- +Channel scheduling and storefront catalog management support live plus catch-up workflows
- +Admin role controls separate catalog edits from publishing actions
- +API and webhooks enable automation for entitlements and broadcast events
- +Mobile and web player distribution reduces per-platform deployment work
- –Live encoder ingest flexibility depends on supported ingest patterns
- –Advanced multi-DRM packaging workflows require careful configuration
- –Few native knobs for stream health telemetry compared with dedicated CDN monitoring stacks
- –Change management for channel updates needs operational discipline
Best for: Fits when media teams need a controllable OTT channel workflow with automation and web and mobile playback.
Vimeo OTT
OTT platformOTT service software for subscription video and live channel distribution with branded applications.
Multi-DRM playback support integrated with Vimeo OTT channel publishing and app configuration
Vimeo OTT delivers live and on-demand streaming through a player and workflow built around channels and apps. Live TV distribution is managed from Vimeo OTT ingest and streaming workflows, with adaptive bitrate packaging and multi-DRM delivery for authenticated playback.
Admin controls focus on publishing, device app configuration, and audience access rules rather than building a full headend. Automation is driven through Vimeo APIs for programming, media management, and integration points tied to Vimeo accounts.
- +Multi-DRM protected playback flows through Vimeo OTT delivery and player
- +Channel and app configuration supports branded live viewing experiences
- +API access supports ingest and media automation tied to Vimeo account objects
- +Live stream playback integrates EPG-like scheduling surfaces through channel tooling
- –Advanced encoder-to-distribution controls are limited versus dedicated live headend products
- –Complex multi-origin failover orchestration is not exposed as a native configuration surface
- –SCTE-35 marker handling for server-side ad insertion requires a tightly scoped workflow
- –Governance for multi-team deployments is thinner than enterprise streaming control planes
Best for: Fits when media teams need branded live apps with multi-DRM delivery and API-driven publishing automation.
Kaltura
enterpriseVideo cloud platform with live streaming, virtual channels, TV app support, and enterprise media workflows.
Kaltura Studio-level media workflows integrate with live publishing controls through a single API surface.
Kaltura is a live TV streaming and managed video platform that centers on ingest, playback delivery, and media operations under one control plane. It supports encoder ingest workflows, adaptive bitrate packaging for HLS and MPEG-DASH playback, and multi-DRM delivery patterns used for premium channels.
Strong governance comes from role-based access controls, content moderation workflows, and administrative audit trails around media and publishing actions. For live channel teams, Kaltura’s differentiator is how studio-style content management connects with live session operations through an extensive API and automation hooks.
- +API-first control for live ingest, publishing, and playback configuration automation
- +Built-in multi-DRM publishing workflow aligned to premium live channel requirements
- +End-to-end media management ties live assets to editorial and moderation tasks
- +Granular permissions for channel teams across upload, publish, and admin actions
- –Live-specific performance tuning requires disciplined configuration across ingest and delivery
- –Complex workflows take time to map into Kaltura’s roles and content lifecycle
Best for: Fits when channel operations need API-driven automation with strong permissions and editorial workflows for live streams.
Harmonic VOS360
broadcast infrastructureSaaS platform for live linear channel processing, origin, ad insertion, and OTT delivery.
VOS360 orchestration focuses on live stream lifecycle control for automated provisioning and health-driven downstream reconfiguration.
Harmonic VOS360 is a Harmonic media service orchestration and delivery control stack built to run live channel workflows with clear separation between ingest, processing, and packaging stages. It is distinct for its orchestration orientation around stream lifecycle management, including automation for provisioning, health handling, and downstream configuration handoffs.
Core capabilities align with large-channel live TV operations, including encoder ingest workflow management, packaging outputs for common player formats, and monitoring hooks tied to stream health. The overall fit is strongest when an ops team needs repeatable channel deployments that can scale with controlled changes across multiple services.
- +Workflow orchestration reduces manual handoffs between ingest and delivery steps
- +Channel lifecycle automation supports recurring live rollout patterns
- +Integration paths align with encoder-to-packaging delivery workflows
- +Operational visibility into stream health helps faster failover response
- –Governance requires disciplined configuration management across dependent services
- –Operational setup depth can slow early pilots without existing channel standards
- –Some advanced player and DRM workflows may depend on adjacent components
- –Debugging multi-stage pipelines can require deeper systems familiarity
Best for: Fits when media ops teams need repeatable live channel provisioning with strong lifecycle control across multiple workflows.
Uscreen
creator OTTMembership and OTT platform with live streaming, subscriptions, and branded app distribution.
Membership and entitlement rules applied directly to live stream playback and scheduled broadcast visibility within the same workflow.
Uscreen targets live streaming businesses that need a storefront-style membership workflow alongside live video playback. The core capabilities center on hosting, live stream playback delivery, and channel management that ties scheduled broadcasts to subscriber access rules.
Uscreen also supports audience monetization controls and content access logic so live streams can be restricted by membership status rather than by custom backend code. Automation and integration depth are narrower than enterprise CDNs, so encoder ingest and low-latency workflows depend more on supported ingest options and its publishing model than on custom headend orchestration.
- +Membership-based access controls link live schedule visibility to subscriber status
- +Channel management supports recurring live broadcasts tied to audience entitlements
- +Built-in playback experience reduces the need for custom front-end player work
- +Operational workflow keeps studio-like publishing steps in one place
- –Encoder ingest flexibility is limited compared with full contribution workflows
- –Live low-latency tuning and packaging controls are not exposed like headend tooling
- –Advanced broadcast engineering features are constrained by the product’s publishing model
- –Deep API-driven governance requires more work than in enterprise streaming stacks
Best for: Fits when membership teams need live channel publishing with subscriber access controls and minimal streaming engineering.
StreamYard On-Air
SMBBrowser-based live production and distribution tool for streaming channels to web and social destinations.
Guest-based interview studio with scene control for producing consistent on-air segments from a single browser session.
StreamYard On-Air handles live TV-style streaming through a browser-based studio that builds a multi-camera show with on-screen graphics. It supports guest participation, scene switching, and integrated broadcast layouts that prepare an output feed for downstream distribution workflows.
Recordings can be produced from the same studio session, while moderation controls and show management features help coordinate live segments. MediaLive and custom encoder workflows are not required to use it, since On-Air can act as the contribution layer for typical HLS or platform ingest patterns.
- +Browser studio enables quick scene switching for live multi-segment shows
- +Guest calling workflow fits interview formats without additional mixing software
- +On-screen graphics and layout tools reduce manual editing between segments
- +Session recording keeps post-show assets tied to the live rundown
- –Advanced encoder ingest and multi-DRM wrapper workflows are not its core focus
- –Failover orchestration and stream health telemetry are limited versus headend tools
- –Large-scale concurrent viewer scaling is dependent on the downstream publishing layer
- –Fine-grained governance controls like detailed RBAC and audit log are constrained
Best for: Fits when teams need a browser studio for live shows and want studio-to-publisher workflows without custom production software.
Resi
reliability-focusedStreaming platform for reliable live broadcasts with hardware encoder support and destination distribution.
Resi orchestrates end-to-end live channel lifecycle, linking operational state changes to distribution packaging behavior.
Resi is a live TV streaming software solution aimed at broadcasters and media ops teams running channel workflows across cloud and managed player delivery. It focuses on ingest-to-distribution orchestration for live channels, including packaging for HLS playback and operational controls around stream lifecycle.
Resi also supports integrations needed to map EPG content, run automated channel updates, and keep delivery behavior consistent across multiple viewers. Teams using encoder workflows and health telemetry can connect Resi-managed channel states to incident handling and routine operations.
- +Channel workflow orchestration covers ingest, packaging, and player delivery
- +Automation support reduces repetitive channel configuration changes
- +Operational controls support repeatable live channel lifecycle management
- +Integration hooks help connect EPG data and distribution behavior
- –Advanced encoder routing and failover needs careful workflow design
- –Customization depth can require tighter configuration discipline
- –Multi-DRM and ad-insertion workflows add operational complexity
- –Complex deployments may need stronger internal runbook coverage
Best for: Fits when media teams need orchestrated live channel workflows with automation and EPG-linked operations.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 communication media, Castr stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right live tv streaming software
Live tv streaming software is used to move live encoder ingest into browser-ready playback, with production-time control over which channels publish and how outputs behave. This buyer’s guide covers Castr, Wowza, Brightcove, and the other listed options, focusing on encoder workflows, channel lifecycle automation, and platform fit for live channel operations.
Across the set, tools differ most in how they handle event-centric stream management, server-side multi-DRM packaging, and API-driven provisioning of live channels. Castr leads for low-publish-overhead live session workflows, while Wowza and Brightcove lean toward configurable ingest-to-output pipelines with heavier ops ownership.
Live TV Streaming Software for Encoder Ingest, Live Channel Packaging, and Delivery Control
Live tv streaming software coordinates encoder ingest, live packaging, and playback delivery so teams can publish consistent streams across devices and app surfaces. The category also includes workflows for live scheduling, catch-up or time-shifted playback enablement, and operational state changes that propagate to distribution.
Castr emphasizes event-centric stream management that pairs encoder ingest with ready-to-embed playback configuration for each live session. Wowza emphasizes a configurable ingest-to-output pipeline with server-side multi-DRM wrapper handling and HLS plus MPEG-DASH output control, which fits headend-style live headroom and policy tuning.
Live channel lifecycle controls, packaging outputs, and API-driven governance
Live tv streaming software succeeds when encoder ingest, packaging outputs, and playback delivery move together as one controlled workflow. These capabilities matter most when teams need consistent browser playback configuration for each session, or when they need server-side multi-DRM wrapper and policy control before content reaches players.
Event-centric publish workflows tied to encoder ingest
Castr pairs encoder ingest with ready-to-embed playback configuration per live session and keeps publish steps consistent across streams. This model fits teams that want lower overhead than headend-style workflow orchestration.
Server-side multi-DRM wrapper handling with output policies
Wowza provides server-side multi-DRM wrapper handling tied to configurable live packaging and output policies for HLS and MPEG-DASH. This is a fit when ingest-to-output pipelines must be governed with controlled packaging rules.
API-driven provisioning for repeatable channel publishing
Brightcove emphasizes API-driven channel provisioning and publish-state synchronization so live channels can be configured programmatically. This supports governed workflows where channel configuration changes must be repeatable across environments.
Studio-style scheduling tied to storefront catalogs and access
Muvi connects live channel scheduling to OTT storefront catalog management and player access controls. This makes it easier to align live plus catch-up workflows with catalog visibility and admin role separation.
Branded live apps with multi-DRM playback integration
Vimeo OTT integrates multi-DRM protected playback with its channel publishing and app configuration workflows. This helps teams ship branded live viewing experiences without exposing headend-level routing controls.
Single-API control of live ingest, publishing, and playback configuration
Kaltura unifies live publishing control into a single API surface aligned with editorial workflows and multi-DRM publishing. It suits operations that need API-first automation and role separation for channel and content lifecycle.
Match workflow philosophy to operational control needs across ingest, packaging, and delivery
The fastest path to dependable live channel operations starts with choosing the workflow philosophy that matches the team’s control surface. Some tools focus on event-centric publish management and low publish overhead, while others focus on headend-style policy control through server-side packaging and multi-DRM wrapper logic.
Choose event-centric publish management when session repeatability matters more than headend tuning
Select Castr when encoder ingest needs to trigger a browser-ready playback configuration for each live session with consistent publish workflows. This approach reduces per-session packaging and configuration work compared with policy-heavy headend pipelines.
Choose server-side policy control when packaging and multi-DRM rules must be governed in the same pipeline
Select Wowza when a configurable ingest-to-output pipeline must enforce policy rules across HLS and MPEG-DASH outputs alongside server-side multi-DRM wrapper handling. This model fits teams that can maintain configuration effort and monitoring for complex packaging behavior.
Choose API-driven channel provisioning when live workflows need programmatic state synchronization
Select Brightcove when repeatable live channel configuration must be automated and synchronized with publish state through its API. This fits teams separating admin responsibilities from editorial channel actions with role-based permissions.
Choose studio-style channel scheduling when live playback must align with storefront catalogs and access rules
Select Muvi when live plus catch-up scheduling and storefront catalog management must stay linked to player access control. This reduces drift between what the catalog shows and what subscribers can watch.
Choose orchestration tooling when lifecycle automation must coordinate multiple dependent steps
Select Harmonic VOS360 or Resi when live provisioning requires orchestration across multiple workflows with health-driven downstream reconfiguration. This supports recurring rollout patterns but requires disciplined configuration across dependent services and workflow steps.
Who benefits from event publish management, headend-style policy control, and orchestration depth
Different live tv streaming software setups fit different operational models. Teams that operate live sessions as repeatable events should prioritize tools that reduce publish overhead, while teams that run policy-heavy distribution should prioritize headend-style packaging control.
Mid-size media teams running frequent live sessions
Castr fits teams that need encoder ingest to convert into browser-ready playback with lower publish overhead than full headend workflow orchestration.
Engineering and ops teams managing multi-channel live distribution with strict DRM and packaging policies
Wowza fits teams that want server-side multi-DRM wrapper handling plus configurable HLS and MPEG-DASH output policies that match controlled headend workflows.
Organizations with governed channel operations and an automation-first publishing workflow
Brightcove fits teams that require API-driven channel provisioning and publish-state synchronization with role-based permissions separating admin and editorial duties.
OTT storefront operators aligning live schedules to catalog visibility and subscriber access
Muvi fits operations where live and catch-up content must link to storefront catalog management and access control in one workflow.
Common pitfalls when selecting live tv streaming software for live channel packaging and delivery
Live channel failures often come from choosing tooling that matches the demo workflow but not the operational workflow. The most frequent issues appear when teams underestimate the configuration effort for multi-DRM packaging and when they choose a studio or browser production tool for headend-level requirements.
Selecting a studio workflow tool while expecting headend-grade packaging control
StreamYard On-Air is built around a browser studio experience for live segments and does not expose advanced encoder ingest and multi-DRM wrapper workflows. Headend-style multi-DRM and routing requirements are better handled by Wowza or Wowza-like pipelines.
Underestimating configuration and monitoring effort for complex ingest-to-output policy rules
Wowza can require higher configuration effort when complex packaging and policy rules apply across outputs. Teams should budget for closer ops ownership and tighter monitoring for advanced live packaging setups.
Assuming lifecycle orchestration depth comes for free across dependent services
Harmonic VOS360 and Resi can reduce manual handoffs by orchestrating channel lifecycle steps and state changes. These workflows still require disciplined configuration across dependent services and careful workflow design.
Choosing a player-first branded app workflow when the real requirement is encoder routing flexibility
Vimeo OTT integrates multi-DRM playback with branded channel and app publishing, but advanced encoder-to-distribution controls are limited versus dedicated live headend products. Teams needing advanced encoder routing and failover orchestration should consider headend-focused tooling.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Castr, Wowza, Brightcove, and the other listed tools using a capability-weighted scoring model where features account for 40%, ease and value each account for 30%. Feature evaluation prioritized how encoder ingest becomes publishable browser or app playback, how server-side multi-DRM wrapper and packaging behaviors are governed, and how much repeatable automation exists for live channel lifecycle steps.
Castr scored highest because its event-centric stream management pairs encoder ingest with ready-to-embed playback configuration per live session and keeps multi-stream event management consistent. Wowza and Brightcove scored strongly for configurable pipelines and API-driven provisioning patterns, while orchestration-focused tools ranked lower when governance and integration discipline add operational overhead.
Frequently Asked Questions About live tv streaming software
How do Castr and Brightcove differ in automation from encoder output to player-ready live channels?
Which platform handles server-side multi-DRM packaging and policy around output formats more directly, Wowza or Vimeo OTT?
What breaks if a live workflow needs custom headend-style routing rather than a fixed channel template?
How does Harmonic VOS360 approach provisioning and stream lifecycle automation compared with Kaltura’s control-plane model?
When teams need SSO and fine-grained admin access controls, how do Kaltura and Brightcove compare in practice?
How do Resi and Muvi handle EPG integration and time-shifted playback operations for live channels?
How does Muvi’s studio-to-player workflow differ from StreamYard On-Air when the production step is browser-based?
Which tool is better suited for channel governance that reduces accidental broadcast changes, Castr or Muvi?
Where does Uscreen tend to fall short for encoder ingest flexibility compared with Wowza?
When migrating an existing live channel setup, how do teams typically approach data model and provisioning changes in Brightcove versus Kaltura?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Communication Media alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of communication media tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare communication media tools→