Commissioned Research
Top 10 Best Kiosk Survey Software of 2026

GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE

Market Research

Top 10 Best Kiosk Survey Software of 2026

Compare kiosk survey software tools for hardware-based feedback, covering setup, question types, reporting, and where each fits for teams.

21 min readUpdated Editorially scoped research
How we ranked these tools
01Editorial Scope

Vendors set the topic, but our editors set the inclusion criteria and the evaluation framework before research starts.

02Source Research

AI search agents find sources, extract figures with provenance, and aggregate written reviews. They also transcribe video reviews and podcasts.

Read our full methodology →

Framework: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%

Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy

Kiosk survey software is the mechanism behind unattended on-site feedback on tablets, where offline capture, kiosk mode configuration, and secure data handoff determine whether responses arrive on time. This comparison helps retail and public-venue teams weigh tradeoffs between kiosk UX control and integration options such as APIs, automation, and enterprise governance for platforms like QuestionPro.

QuestionPro is the best overall pick for teams running controlled kiosk sampling because its REST webhooks can push each kiosk response into external workflows in near real time, while SMG fits venues that want a kiosk-locked runtime shell for unattended sessions with less operator handling.

Editor’s top 3 picks

Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.

Editor pick
1

QuestionPro

REST webhook delivery for kiosk responses enables near-real-time routing into external workflows.

Best for: Fits when teams need controlled kiosk sampling and automation hooks without custom kiosk app development.

2

Alchemer

Editor pick

API-first response delivery with webhook-based workflows for near-real-time handoff into other systems.

Best for: Fits when retail or public venues need kiosk surveys plus API-driven response sync into existing systems.

3

SMG

Editor pick

Device runtime is structured around a kiosk lockdown survey shell that reduces operator interaction during unattended sessions.

Best for: Fits when venues need controlled kiosk capture with multilingual questionnaires and scheduled response export.

Comparison Table

1
QuestionProBest overall
SMB
9.4/10
Overall
2
8.9/10
Overall
3
enterprise
8.8/10
Overall
4
vertical specialist
8.4/10
Overall
5
8.0/10
Overall
6
7.7/10
Overall
7
vertical specialist
7.5/10
Overall
8
7.3/10
Overall
9
6.8/10
Overall
10
enterprise
6.7/10
Overall
#1

QuestionPro

SMB

Survey platform with offline app capabilities and kiosk mode options for collecting feedback on tablets.

9.4/10
Overall
Features9.4/10
Ease of Use9.4/10
Value9.4/10
Standout feature

REST webhook delivery for kiosk responses enables near-real-time routing into external workflows.

QuestionPro provides kiosk survey creation and collection for public-facing and staffed retail workflows, with tools for branching logic and survey distribution management. Its strengths for kiosk deployments center on device-focused capture patterns, including unattended-ready flows, response export for downstream analysis, and integration paths for routing survey responses.

Admin controls for survey assets and respondent handling support governance needs when multiple teams manage question libraries. The kiosk experience still depends on deliberate device lockdown and session handling to avoid partial submissions and navigation loops.

Pros
  • +Branching and quota-style routing support controlled kiosk sampling designs
  • +Survey assets and question libraries can be reused across multiple kiosk projects
  • +Exports deliver structured CSV payloads for quick handoff to analysis tools
  • +REST webhook integration enables automation when responses need downstream processing
Cons
  • –Kiosk lockdown behavior requires deliberate device setup and testing
  • –Unattended kiosk session handling needs explicit configuration to prevent repeat submissions
Use scenarios
  • Human resources teams

    Run recurring employee pulse on kiosks

    Repeatable sentiment measurement

  • Survey research teams

    Collect kiosk responses via QR links

    Broader response collection

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Telephone research teams

    Standardize interviewer scripts with branching

    More consistent captures

    Call center interviewers follow programmable question paths with screening, call outcomes, and quota tracking.

  • Research analysts

    Export kiosk results for analysis

    Less manual re-entry

    Analysts export common survey result formats to reduce re-entry before deeper statistical work.

Best for: Fits when teams need controlled kiosk sampling and automation hooks without custom kiosk app development.

#2

Alchemer

SMB

Survey and feedback platform with offline survey options that can be adapted for kiosk-based collection.

8.9/10
Overall
Features8.9/10
Ease of Use8.9/10
Value8.9/10
Standout feature

API-first response delivery with webhook-based workflows for near-real-time handoff into other systems.

Alchemer is a kiosk survey solution suited to retail and public-venue teams that need controlled question flows, branded survey capture, and repeatable device rollouts. It supports kiosk-oriented survey design with skip logic, question types built for touch screens, and response export workflows for downstream reporting.

Alchemer also supports automation via its API and webhook patterns for response sync into other systems like CRM, ticketing, or data warehouses. Strong governance options include role-based access and audit trails that help multi-location teams manage who can publish, edit, and access results.

Pros
  • +API and webhooks support automated response sync to external systems
  • +RBAC plus audit trails support multi-role publishing and results access control
  • +Kiosk-friendly survey branching supports targeted intercept flows
  • +Reusable reporting and export paths reduce manual consolidation work
Cons
  • –Unattended kiosk device lockdown requires extra integration work
  • –Offline capture and response queueing are not as straightforward as specialist kiosks
  • –Complex quota routing needs careful logic design to avoid edge-case outcomes
  • –Multi-language locale packs add setup overhead for large device fleets
Use scenarios
  • Digital experience teams

    Embed kiosk surveys on-site

    Instant point-of-contact data

  • Marketing operations teams

    Attribute kiosk feedback to campaigns

    Campaign-linked attribution

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Operations and integrations teams

    Sync kiosk responses via webhooks

    Automated downstream handling

    Operations teams send response events through webhooks or APIs to trigger downstream processing workflows.

  • Healthcare program teams

    Capture sensitive intake on kiosks

    Restricted access by workflow

    Healthcare teams use conditional fields plus permissions and auditability to limit access to the right data.

Best for: Fits when retail or public venues need kiosk surveys plus API-driven response sync into existing systems.

#3

SMG

enterprise

Enterprise customer experience platform with in-location feedback capture including kiosk and on-site survey programs.

8.8/10
Overall
Features8.8/10
Ease of Use8.8/10
Value8.8/10
Standout feature

Device runtime is structured around a kiosk lockdown survey shell that reduces operator interaction during unattended sessions.

SMG fits organizations that need kiosk lockdown for public venues because its kiosk workflow is designed around a single purpose survey app shell. Survey logic includes skip logic, branching, and quota-style routing patterns for directing panelists through different question paths. Multilingual locale packs are handled at the content layer so the same kiosk build can present language-specific text during session start.

The main tradeoff is that deeper extensibility, like custom device-side logic beyond the standard survey engine, depends on SMG’s integration paths rather than self-serve developer tooling. SMG works best when a venue team runs scheduled feedback capture, syncs responses to a central dataset, and exports CSV payloads for reporting while keeping device operators out of the survey runtime.

Pros
  • +Kiosk lockdown workflow designed around a single survey runtime
  • +Skip logic and branching support multi-path venue questionnaires
  • +Multilingual locale packs keep device builds aligned across languages
  • +Response syncing supports scheduled and batch-style reporting
Cons
  • –Custom kiosk behavior beyond the survey engine needs integration work
  • –Advanced device management requires coordination with SMG support
  • –Unattended reliability depends on correct device provisioning setup
  • –Exports can require post-processing for complex dashboard models
Use scenarios
  • Retail operations teams

    In-store feedback kiosk capture

    Faster, consistent customer feedback

  • Public venue CX teams

    Unattended survey in lobby devices

    Higher capture throughput

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Research operations leads

    Intercept sampling by session logic

    Controlled sampling coverage

    Quota-style routing can direct panelists into different questionnaires during capture.

  • Global venue teams

    Multi-language questionnaire rollout

    Reduced localization friction

    Multilingual locale packs support consistent survey content across multiple languages.

Best for: Fits when venues need controlled kiosk capture with multilingual questionnaires and scheduled response export.

#4

SurveyStance

vertical specialist

Kiosk-focused survey software for tablets with offline mode, branding controls, and response collection at physical locations.

8.4/10
Overall
Features8.4/10
Ease of Use8.3/10
Value8.5/10
Standout feature

Device provisioning profiles paired with device heartbeat make unattended fleet operations easier to supervise than manual kiosk checks.

SurveyStance is built for kiosk deployments where touch sessions start, collect responses, and then reset without staff intervention. The survey runtime supports branching logic, quota routing, and intercept sampling so venues can vary flows by visitor intent and control respondent mix. For operational control, the system uses device provisioning profiles and device heartbeat monitoring to keep kiosk devices reachable during unattended hours.

Pros
  • +Unattended kiosk runtime with kiosk lockdown behavior
  • +Device provisioning profiles and device heartbeat for fleet monitoring
  • +Branch logic and quota routing for controlled intercept design
  • +Response sync with exportable CSV payloads for reporting
Cons
  • –Advanced kiosk UI customization relies on integration work
  • –Multi-device testing needs discipline to avoid workflow drift
  • –Offline capture behavior can require careful rollout planning
Use scenarios
  • Retail operations teams

    Daily checkout kiosk experience intercept

    More consistent feedback mix

  • Museum visitor services

    Unattended gallery dwell-time feedback capture

    Lower staffing for surveys

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Public venue marketing

    Touchless QR handoff satisfaction survey

    Higher completion rates

    Anonymous session flows start from the kiosk shell and apply branch logic to reduce question fatigue.

  • Market research analysts

    Survey response export for BI refresh

    Faster analysis cycles

    Results can be exported as CSV payloads and merged into existing reporting workflows.

Best for: Fits when retail and venue teams run frequent unattended intercepts with controlled respondent routing and sync.

#5

Zoho Survey

SMB

Survey builder that supports offline response capture on mobile devices for kiosk-style data collection.

8.0/10
Overall
Features8.0/10
Ease of Use8.0/10
Value8.0/10
Standout feature

Branch logic plus validation in the form builder to enforce kiosk-friendly guided flows without custom kiosk UI logic.

Zoho Survey can collect kiosk-style feedback from public devices through configurable forms, question logic, and response capture workflows. It supports offline capture patterns through client buffering and later response sync, which fits venues that need uninterrupted collection during connectivity dips.

Pros
  • +Question branching and validation enable guided kiosk interviews
  • +Offline capture with later response sync helps reduce data loss
  • +Zoho ecosystem integrations support consistent reporting across tools
  • +Export options support direct CSV payload handling for analysis
Cons
  • –Unattended kiosk lockdown requires extra device and app wrapper work
  • –Webhook and API coverage for kiosk-specific session controls is limited
Use scenarios
  • Hospitality venue teams

    Capture kiosk feedback during Wi-Fi gaps

    No missed kiosk answers

  • Customer experience teams

    Route kiosk interviews with branching

    Fewer irrelevant questions

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Ops reporting teams

    Export kiosk results for analysis

    Faster reporting cycles

    Reporting teams export completed responses for aggregation and follow-on reporting work outside the form tool.

  • Zoho ecosystem administrators

    Push kiosk data into connected tools

    Less manual data handling

    Administrators move results into other systems using Zoho automation and API interfaces for processing.

Best for: Fits when public-venue teams need guided survey logic and later sync from kiosk sessions.

#6

Zonka Feedback

SMB

Customer experience and feedback platform with dedicated kiosk mode for tablets.

7.7/10
Overall
Features7.7/10
Ease of Use7.7/10
Value7.7/10
Standout feature

REST webhook and API-based response handling to trigger downstream workflows from kiosk submissions.

Zonka Feedback is a kiosk survey tool built for public-venue and retail use cases that need controlled, device-backed data capture and reporting. It supports multi-step survey flows with routing logic, and it includes administrative controls for managing kiosk devices and campaigns.

Pros
  • +Device and campaign governance supports consistent unattended kiosk deployments
  • +Survey branching and skip behavior fit real-world queue and service workflows
  • +Webhook and API access supports response automation and system handoff
  • +Response export formats support common BI and analysis pipelines
Cons
  • –Kiosk app lock-down options depend on device provisioning practices
  • –Advanced attribution across sessions can require careful operational configuration
Use scenarios
  • HR and employee experience teams

    Run branded employee pulse on kiosks

    Structured sentiment insights

  • Hotel operations teams

    Capture post-stay recovery via QR kiosks

    Faster issue resolution

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Customer experience managers

    Measure CES or CSAT across kiosks

    Comparable cross-channel data

    CX managers capture comparable CES, CSAT, or NPS signals from kiosks and other touchpoints using routed feedback collection.

  • Support operations teams

    Trigger follow-up from low CSAT

    Quicker problem identification

    Support teams send post-interaction CSAT or NPS surveys and direct unfavorable outcomes to service owners.

Best for: Fits when retail or venue teams need kiosk governance and workflow automation without extensive custom development.

#7

QuickTapSurvey

vertical specialist

Tablet and kiosk survey app designed for offline data collection at events and locations.

7.5/10
Overall
Features7.5/10
Ease of Use7.6/10
Value7.4/10
Standout feature

QR-to-kiosk handoff flow designed for unattended public capture paired with skip logic in the survey flow.

QuickTapSurvey is built around kiosk deployment patterns with Android lockdown expectations, kiosk app shell behavior, and an operator workflow that fits public-facing touchpoints. It includes skip logic so staff can route panelists through fewer questions and it supports multi-language locale packs for on-premise capture. Captured responses can be synced to reporting output and exported as a CSV payload for analysis tools.

Pros
  • +Kiosk-oriented capture workflow with QR entry for touchless handoff
  • +Built-in skip logic supports shorter interviewer-less journeys
  • +CSV exports support standard analysis pipelines without extra tooling
  • +Multi-language locale pack supports mixed-language venues
Cons
  • –Automation depth for quota routing across many sites can take integration time
  • –Extensibility via API is not as prominent as in enterprise survey suites
  • –Offline capture behavior depends on kiosk setup discipline
Use scenarios
  • Retail ops teams

    Daily exit polling on kiosk

    Higher response completion rates

  • Venue experience managers

    Multi-language onsite satisfaction intercept

    Lower language-based drop-off

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Market research coordinators

    Recurring location programs with exports

    Faster data consolidation

    Coordinators sync kiosk results and export responses as CSV payloads for analysis tools.

  • Store analytics teams

    Device-driven response capture workflows

    More consistent on-site collection

    Teams use a kiosk app shell workflow to standardize where and how devices present surveys.

Best for: Fits when venue teams need repeatable kiosk surveys with logic and CSV exports for reporting.

#8

Jotform

SMB

Form and survey platform with kiosk mode for shared devices and touch-friendly in-person data capture.

7.3/10
Overall
Features7.3/10
Ease of Use7.3/10
Value7.3/10
Standout feature

Jotform webhooks plus REST API let survey submissions trigger external workflows in near real time.

Jotform combines form building with kiosk-ready distribution patterns, letting teams design surveys that can run as single-screen flows. It supports skip logic, multiple input types, and media elements inside the survey builder.

Pros
  • +Form builder supports rich question types and media for kiosk screens
  • +Skip logic enables conditional question flows without custom code
  • +REST webhooks and API support survey-to-system automation
  • +Submission exports to CSV style payloads for reporting pipelines
Cons
  • –Kiosk lockdown and supervised device control require separate MDM work
  • –Kiosk queueing and intercept sampling workflows need custom orchestration
  • –Advanced governance like audit log granularity depends on account setup
  • –Offline capture and response sync require external handling
Use scenarios
  • Marketing and research teams

    Publish kiosk feedback with branching

    Structured exportable feedback

  • Training departments

    Collect course ratings on kiosk forms

    Consistent evaluation responses

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Inspection and field teams

    Run conditional inspection checklists on kiosks

    More consistent inspection records

    Field teams collect measurements and evidence uploads with conditional sections and review steps in one guided flow.

  • Small service businesses

    Collect appointment and payment requests

    Consolidated booking intake

    Service providers use form-based intake to combine booking details with payment-oriented workflow fields.

Best for: Fits when teams need configurable kiosk-style survey flows and workflow automation via webhooks.

#9

SurveySparrow

SMB

Conversational survey platform featuring a kiosk mode for unattended tablet data collection.

6.8/10
Overall
Features6.8/10
Ease of Use6.8/10
Value6.8/10
Standout feature

Branching question logic combined with quota routing for controlling which kiosk respondents see which follow-up paths.

SurveySparrow is built for creating kiosk-ready surveys that can run in a locked-down browser experience for on-site capture. It supports the full survey authoring workflow with branching logic, quotas, and question types aimed at collecting structured feedback quickly from unattended devices.

Pros
  • +Kiosk-focused survey configuration for touch-first, single-session capture flows
  • +Branch logic and quotas handle routing without extra custom code
  • +Response export supports CSV payload outputs for offline analysis
  • +Automation hooks support pushing results to external systems
Cons
  • –Unattended kiosk deployments require disciplined device configuration and monitoring
  • –Complex multi-survey page flows can be slower to validate at scale
Use scenarios
  • Field research and event teams

    Guide QR tablet interviews with quotas

    Validated on-site responses

  • HR and employee experience teams

    Route employee pulse by answer paths

    Structured employee sentiment

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Marketing and feedback program teams

    Track and remind based on email status

    Reduced navigation friction

    Marketing teams send interactive survey questions in email and adjust reminders based on partial or completion status.

  • Healthcare patient experience teams

    Collect multilingual post-visit kiosk feedback

    Service improvement reporting

    Healthcare teams capture patient satisfaction data with branching and multilingual prompts plus dashboards.

Best for: Fits when retail or public-venue teams need kiosk surveys with routing logic and export-ready results.

#10

Medallia

enterprise

Customer experience platform supporting digital kiosk feedback capture at physical touchpoints.

6.7/10
Overall
Features6.7/10
Ease of Use6.7/10
Value6.7/10
Standout feature

Experience program workflow integration that connects kiosk responses to enterprise follow-up and reporting paths.

Medallia is a kiosk survey software option geared toward large public-venue and retail teams that need feedback collection connected to existing experience programs. It combines kiosk-oriented survey experiences with an enterprise feedback backend that supports closed-loop follow-up workflows and centralized reporting.

Pros
  • +Strong enterprise feedback workflows built around Medallia’s experience program model
  • +Integration and automation surface designed for downstream routing and reporting
  • +Admin governance supports multi-team control without flattening workflows
  • +Kiosk deployment can be managed as part of a broader device and data pipeline
Cons
  • –Kiosk rollout depends on integration discipline with existing systems
  • –Unattended kiosk UX customization is less flexible than kiosk-first builders
  • –Survey configuration and governance can require specialist effort at scale
  • –Offline capture and sync behavior needs careful design to match field conditions
Use scenarios
  • Global survey administrators

    Standardize kiosk questionnaires across regions

    Consistent feedback reporting

  • Healthcare patient experience teams

    Collect multilingual kiosk feedback for routing

    Segmented service recovery

Show 2 more scenarios
  • Hospitality guest experience teams

    Identify lodging issues from kiosk surveys

    More consistent issue resolution

    Hospitality teams use guest surveys and action workflows to identify and track service issues across experiences.

  • Enterprise CX and VoC leaders

    Centralize kiosk signals into VoC programs

    Single view of experience signals

    CX leaders centralize signals from surveys and other channels under shared governance with enterprise reporting and actions.

Best for: Fits when enterprise teams need kiosk feedback to flow into governed experience programs and automation.

Conclusion

After evaluating 10 kiosk survey software, QuestionPro stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.

Our Top Pick
QuestionPro

Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.

Frequently Asked Questions About Kiosk Survey Software

Which tools support kiosk workflows that run unattended on managed endpoints?
SurveyStance is designed for unattended mode with a kiosk app shell and device provisioning profiles tied to a deployed fleet. SMG also supports unattended and managed kiosk sessions with governance controls that limit operator actions during capture. Alchemer and SurveySparrow support locked-down kiosk experiences, but they focus more on survey delivery and device-facing configuration than on fleet provisioning depth.
How do SurveyStance, Zoho Survey, and QuestionPro handle response sync when kiosks lose connectivity?
Zoho Survey supports offline capture through client buffering and later response sync, which keeps kiosks usable during connectivity dips. SurveyStance focuses on device-to-server sync for unattended sessions and exports results for downstream reporting. QuestionPro supports kiosk collection and response export, but resilience during offline periods depends on the session handling model used for kiosk deployments.
What breaks if kiosk devices are not locked into a single-app or kiosk shell mode?
QuestionPro’s kiosk experience can produce partial submissions and navigation loops if device lockdown and session handling are not enforced. SMG mitigates operator interaction with a kiosk lockdown survey shell, which reduces off-flow navigation during unattended use. SurveyStance also centers on kiosk app shell behavior and single-app mode, which prevents respondents from leaving the flow mid-capture.
How do REST webhooks differ from API-based exports for routing kiosk responses into external systems?
QuestionPro provides REST webhook delivery so kiosk responses can be routed near real time into external workflows. Alchemer uses an API with webhook-based response sync patterns for downstream handoff into systems like CRM, ticketing, or data warehouses. Zonka Feedback and Jotform both support webhook and API access, but Zonka Feedback emphasizes device-backed operations for unattended kiosks rather than pure form-to-workflow automation.
When should kiosk teams use provisioning profiles or configuration distribution instead of manual setup?
SurveyStance uses device provisioning profiles paired with device heartbeat, which reduces the operational burden of checking each kiosk manually. SMG distributes survey configurations to managed endpoints and limits operator actions during sessions, which improves consistency across devices. SurveySparrow also supports device-facing survey configurations for multi-location deployments, which fits teams that need repeatable rollout controls.
Which tools provide granular admin controls for multi-location governance and who can change what?
Alchemer includes role-based access and audit trails, which supports controlled publishing and editing across teams and locations. QuestionPro provides admin controls for survey assets and respondent handling when multiple teams manage question libraries. SurveyStance emphasizes operational oversight through device provisioning and fleet supervision, which covers device management more than content RBAC depth.
What integration patterns fit retail and venue workflows that require near-real-time intercept sampling and downstream follow-up?
Alchemer supports API-driven response sync with webhook-based patterns for near real time handoff into other systems. Zonka Feedback focuses on kiosk governance for unattended capture while still triggering downstream follow-up workflows through webhooks and API access. Medallia is built for enterprise feedback programs where kiosk responses connect to closed-loop follow-up and centralized reporting.
How do SurveySparrow and SurveyStance compare on routing logic for structured kiosk follow-ups?
SurveySparrow combines branching question logic with quota routing to control which kiosk respondents see follow-up paths. SurveyStance uses branch logic for question flow and supports controlled respondent routing in unattended intercept programs. Zoho Survey enforces kiosk-friendly guided flows through branching and validation in the form builder, which can reduce operator intervention needs.
Which tool is better when the kiosk program depends on touch-first form guidance without custom kiosk UI development?
Zoho Survey supports guided interview patterns through branching and validation in its form builder, which avoids building custom kiosk UI logic for common flows. Jotform supports kiosk-ready single-screen flows with skip logic and media in the survey builder, but it does not provide the device-layer lockdown and fleet management needed for unattended kiosk operations. SurveyStance provides the kiosk app shell and single-app mode behavior, which shifts the burden from survey UI customization to device configuration.

Tools reviewed

Primary sources checked during evaluation.

Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.

How to Choose the Right Kiosk Survey Software

What separates kiosk survey software for us is how reliably it runs unattended, how cleanly it controls the questionnaire flow, and how well it returns usable results. Look at Start-at-load behavior, Branching logic, and Result export format before you commit.

Start-at-load kiosk behavior

Why it matters

Start-at-load kiosk behavior matters because a survey that doesn’t begin consistently costs real throughput and creates operator work. We want predictable session start and recovery after idle time.

How to check

On a demo unit, open the kiosk link/app and confirm what happens on first load and after a few minutes idle. Ask what the system does after a timeout and whether staff see a clear “ready” state without reloading.

Branching logic in survey flow

Why it matters

Branching logic keeps questionnaires relevant and reduces partial responses. The quality of branching also affects whether results reflect the intended decision paths.

How to check

Build (or ask for) a two-question sample where an answer should skip or route to different follow-ups. Then review the captured responses to confirm the correct questions were asked and only the intended fields were stored.

Anonymous versus identified responses

Why it matters

Anonymous versus identified responses affects reporting, consent wording, and downstream use. We need control that matches whether you collect only feedback or also map to a person/session.

How to check

Ask the admin to show how the survey is configured for anonymous and identified modes. On output, confirm what fields are present or absent for each mode and whether identifiers can be hidden or removed.

Result export format and fields

Why it matters

Result export format and fields determine whether reports match what you asked and whether analysts can reuse data. A mismatch here turns demos into manual cleanup later.

How to check

On a demo, submit a completed and an abandoned survey session, then export results. Check whether exports include timestamps, question text/IDs, and how multi-page answers appear in the file.

Resilience to dropped kiosk sessions

Why it matters

Resilience to dropped kiosk sessions matters when visitors walk away mid-survey. We want clarity on what the system stores, how partial responses are handled, and how sessions are marked.

How to check

During the demo, start a survey and leave mid-way, then refresh or restart the kiosk. Review the results list to see whether partial data is discarded, saved with a clear status, or causes duplicates.

How surveys update on kiosks

Why it matters

How surveys update on kiosks affects whether your changes actually reach the device the same day. We care about the configuration workflow and what happens during an in-progress session.

How to check

Ask the admin to change a question or branching rule and describe when kiosks pick it up. In the demo, submit a response before and after the update to confirm each response reflects the correct survey version.

Red flags

  • The kiosk shows a confusing state after idle or restart
  • Branching causes unexpected questions or missing answers
  • Exports don’t clearly map answers to the questions shown

Fit by situation

  • If you need surveys to start reliably after idle, prioritize Start-at-load kiosk behavior.
  • If your questionnaire has follow-up questions, prioritize Branching logic in survey flow.
  • If you must report on completed versus abandoned sessions, prioritize Resilience to dropped kiosk sessions.
Commissioned Research

Funding and competing interests

This study was co-funded by several of the vendors assessed in it. No single vendor funded it. Funders could propose the market studied.

They had no role in selecting vendors, setting or weighting criteria, analysing data or drawing conclusions, and they received the same factual-accuracy check as every other vendor assessed.

Market definition, inclusion rules and criteria weights were fixed by an editor before research began and did not change afterwards. Editorial process →

Keep exploring

FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS

Not on this list? Let’s fix that.

Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.

Apply for a Listing

WHAT THIS INCLUDES

  • Where buyers compare

    Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.

  • Editorial write-up

    We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.

  • On-page brand presence

    You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.

  • Kept up to date

    We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.