GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
SecurityTop 10 Best Key Tracking Software of 2026
Top 10 ranking of key tracking software with feature comparisons for SEO teams, covering Keyword.com, AccuRanker, and Nightwatch tradeoffs.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Keyword.com is the most solid fit for SEO teams that need scheduled, repeatable keyword ranking history and stakeholder-ready reporting, whereas AccuRanker works best when you want faster ongoing rank checks with segmentation and trend-focused updates.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Keyword.com
Historical position change tracking across scheduled runs tied to project dashboards for recurring reporting.
Built for fits when SEO teams need scheduled ranking history and repeatable stakeholder reports..
AccuRanker
Editor pickRank change history that ties movement to specific keyword groups across scheduled checks, reducing time spent reconstructing what changed.
Built for fits when SEO teams need ongoing keyword tracking with scheduled updates and stakeholder-ready trend reporting..
Nightwatch
Editor pickAPI-first event synchronization for keeping key custody status aligned with external operations systems.
Built for fits when multi-site facilities need automated key custody logging with API-based integrations..
Related reading
Comparison Table
Key tracking software matters because it turns volatile SERP movement into scheduled position data, local granularity, and comparable client or internal reports. This ranked list targets analysts and operators who must validate methodology, data freshness, and automation coverage, with placement based on monitoring breadth, configuration depth, reporting rigor, and how each platform handles segmentation and competitors.
Keyword.com
enterpriseProvides branded keyword rank tracking, local search monitoring, and client reporting.
Historical position change tracking across scheduled runs tied to project dashboards for recurring reporting.
Keyword.com’s core workflow starts with keyword lists and target settings, then runs scheduled ranking checks and preserves historical changes for trend review. The interface is built around tracking dashboards and reporting outputs that support regular SEO status updates without exporting every time. Shareable views and report exports help teams circulate results across roles that do not edit tracking configuration.
A practical tradeoff appears in the setup overhead for multi-location and multi-domain monitoring, since consistent target definitions must be maintained across projects. Keyword.com fits best when keyword sets change occasionally and reporting needs repeat on a schedule, not when ad hoc, one-off investigations dominate daily work.
- +Scheduled rank tracking supports ongoing SEO monitoring workflows
- +Historical position changes enable trend review and regression spotting
- +Report exports fit recurring stakeholder update cycles
- +Shareable views reduce manual copying of ranking screenshots
- –Multi-target definitions require careful setup to avoid mismatched reporting
- –Automation depth depends on available integration options
- –Large keyword inventories can create heavy navigation when filtering is insufficient
- –Attribution of rank movement still needs editorial interpretation
SEO managers
Weekly reporting on keyword ranking trends
Fewer manual checks, faster updates
Content strategists
Validate topic coverage with rank history
Clearer topic performance signals
Show 2 more scenarios
Agencies
Share client-ready ranking views
Consistent client communication
Exportable outputs and shareable reporting reduce ad hoc deck rebuilding for each check-in.
Marketing analysts
Monitor regressions after optimization
Earlier detection of downturns
Change history supports spotting declines after on-page and technical adjustments.
Best for: Fits when SEO teams need scheduled ranking history and repeatable stakeholder reports.
More related reading
AccuRanker
specialistDelivers fast keyword rank tracking with segmentation, competitor data, and reporting tools.
Rank change history that ties movement to specific keyword groups across scheduled checks, reducing time spent reconstructing what changed.
AccuRanker organizes tracking around projects that can include many keywords, locations, and devices so reporting stays consistent across updates. Scheduled rank checks and change history help teams pinpoint when movement happened and which queries shifted. A useful fit signal is the emphasis on reporting outputs tied to tracked groups, since stakeholders can review changes without manual exports.
A tradeoff is that accuracy and usefulness depend on how locations, devices, and keyword sets are configured at the project level. AccuRanker fits teams that need continuous monitoring and regular reporting cycles for SEO work, especially when multiple sites or market segments must be tracked in parallel.
- +Scheduled keyword checks with clear movement history
- +Project organization supports large keyword sets
- +Reporting views map directly to tracked groups
- +Supports multi-location and device tracking for comparisons
- –Setup quality depends on project configuration choices
- –Advanced workflows require governance around keyword grouping
SEO managers
Weekly reporting on keyword movement
Faster stakeholder updates
Agencies
Monitor multiple client sites
Less manual consolidation
Show 1 more scenario
Content strategists
Validate ranking after content publishing
Better publishing decisions
Compare rank movement over time for tracked queries tied to editorial themes.
Best for: Fits when SEO teams need ongoing keyword tracking with scheduled updates and stakeholder-ready trend reporting.
Nightwatch
SMBTracks keyword positions with local, mobile, desktop, competitor, and backlink monitoring.
API-first event synchronization for keeping key custody status aligned with external operations systems.
Nightwatch provides structured key custody workflows that map directly to day-to-day key issue and return operations. The system records event history around key checkout and key check-in so audit trails remain consistent across locations. Configuration supports role separation for standard users and administrators handling key assignment and inventory rules. Device and integration options enable automated state updates instead of relying on manual spreadsheet entry.
A practical tradeoff is that strong governance requires upfront rule and tagging decisions, including how keys are identified for ongoing tracking. Nightwatch fits best when facilities or ops teams need consistent custody logging across sites and want automation backed by an API rather than periodic exports. Teams that require ad hoc hardware changes or informal tagging conventions will spend more time aligning key identifiers and permissions.
- +Automated checkout and check-in workflows with consistent event history
- +Admin controls for multi-location operations and role separation
- +API integration supports event syncing with external systems
- +Configurable custody rules reduce manual reconciliation work
- –Governance depends on consistent key identification and setup discipline
- –Some edge workflows need custom configuration instead of one-click options
- –RBAC configuration can feel rigid when roles change frequently
- –Hardware-driven operations may require periodic maintenance alignment
Facilities operations teams
Multi-site key issue and return logging
Fewer lost-key discrepancies
Access control managers
Access permission gating for key usage
Tighter access governance
Show 2 more scenarios
IT integrations teams
Event-driven sync with asset systems
Near-real-time key inventory updates
Streams key status changes through the API for downstream inventory and reporting.
Compliance and audit owners
Chain-of-custody reporting
More consistent audit records
Centralizes key checkout and key check-in history for repeatable audit trail reviews.
Best for: Fits when multi-site facilities need automated key custody logging with API-based integrations.
Semrush Position Tracking
enterpriseTracks keyword rankings across locations, devices, competitors, and search features.
Project-based keyword rank history with competitor comparison views for diagnosing sustained visibility changes.
Semrush Position Tracking focuses on keyword ranking monitoring across search engines with project-based setups that track visibility over time. It supports competitor position comparisons and customizable tracking settings that map work to specific keywords, locations, and device types.
The workflow centers on scheduled rank checks, alerts, and reporting views that tie ranking movement to ongoing SEO tasks. Automation and integration options extend beyond dashboards through Semrush’s broader ecosystem for keyword research and campaign tracking.
- +Scheduled rank tracking with historical visibility views by keyword and location
- +Competitor position tracking supports side-by-side movement checks
- +Device and location targeting reduces noise in SERP comparisons
- +Reports integrate into broader Semrush SEO workflows
- –Ranking reports can feel heavy when tracking very large keyword sets
- –Alert rules require careful scoping to avoid noisy notifications
- –Multi-market tracking setup takes time when locations change frequently
- –API automation depends on Semrush project configuration patterns
Best for: Fits when SEO teams need repeatable keyword ranking tracking tied to ongoing campaign work.
SE Ranking
SMBProvides daily keyword rank checks, competitor tracking, local rankings, and automated reports.
Competitor keyword tracking that ties rank changes to rival query sets for faster diagnosis.
SE Ranking tracks keyword rankings with daily visibility reporting across search engines and locations. It supports workflow-driven monitoring through scheduled rank checks, alerts, and competitor keyword tracking that ties changes back to specific queries.
The suite is organized around campaign and keyword group management so teams can manage large keyword sets without spreadsheet churn. API access and export options support automation for reporting and downstream integrations.
- +Scheduled keyword checks with configurable alerts reduce monitoring gaps
- +Competitor keyword tracking connects rank movement to rival visibility
- +Bulk keyword imports and grouping support large inventories
- +API access and exports support automated reporting workflows
- –More advanced setup takes time when managing multi-location projects
- –Less suited to custom ranking workflows beyond keyword tracking
- –Alert rules can become noisy at high keyword volume
- –Some reporting views prioritize rank over deeper SERP context
Best for: Fits when SEO teams need scheduled rank tracking and alerts with automation via API.
Ahrefs Rank Tracker
enterpriseMonitors keyword positions, competitors, visibility, and search features across major search engines.
Rank history tracking with continuity-aware updates that keep movement trends coherent across tracking runs.
Ahrefs Rank Tracker focuses on search visibility monitoring by tracking keyword positions across locations and devices. It builds rank history with continuity-aware updates, so teams can see movement patterns instead of single snapshots.
Core workflows include importing keyword lists, tracking competitor sets, and exporting reports for stakeholder updates. The setup is centered on managing tracking projects and recurring checks rather than building custom dashboards from scratch.
- +Rank history charts show movement across updates, not just current positions
- +Location and device targeting supports SERP differences for the same keyword
- +Keyword list imports and recurring tracking fit ongoing SEO operations
- +Competitor tracking helps contextualize ranking changes
- –Reporting customization is limited compared with BI-style workflow tooling
- –Large keyword sets can create heavy project management overhead
- –Some advanced automation requires exporting and external processing
- –Project organization can become complex across many client accounts
Best for: Fits when SEO teams need keyword-level rank history with consistent SERP targeting and recurring reporting.
Wincher
SMBTracks keyword rankings with competitor comparisons, alerts, and scheduled SEO reports.
Keyword rank change monitoring with notification workflows tied to tracked terms and their movement history.
Wincher is a key tracking product built for search visibility monitoring, not physical key custody workflows. It tracks keyword positions over time and highlights ranking changes, so teams can spot SEO execution gaps.
Core capabilities center on automated rank collection, visibility reporting, and alerting when keyword performance shifts. Integration options focus on marketing data connections rather than access control records for key holders.
- +Automated keyword rank collection with historical trend reporting
- +Change visibility across tracked keywords for quick diagnosis
- +Alerting for ranking movement to reduce manual checking
- +Works well for SEO teams needing ongoing position monitoring
- –No native features for key checkout, key check-in, or custody logs
- –Automation and API surface target SEO workflows, not key inventory governance
- –Keyword tracking data model does not map cleanly to chain-of-custody requirements
- –Reporting centers on rankings instead of key utilization and return tracking
Best for: Fits when marketing teams need ongoing keyword position tracking and alerting, not key custody management.
BrightLocal Local Rank Tracker
vertical specialistMeasures local keyword rankings by city, postal code, device, and competitor.
Location-organized reporting ties rank changes to specific business locations for faster diagnosis than keyword-only dashboards.
BrightLocal Local Rank Tracker focuses on local SEO rank monitoring across locations and business listings, with workflow built for multi-location reporting. Location-level rank visibility, customizable reporting views, and scheduled exports support recurring client or internal check-ins.
The tool’s differentiator versus generic position trackers is how it organizes local rank outcomes around business locations rather than only keyword lists. BrightLocal also supports collaboration-friendly reporting artifacts that can be reused across campaigns.
- +Location-based rank tracking supports multi-branch reporting.
- +Scheduled reports reduce manual exporting for recurring reviews.
- +Campaign views keep keyword performance tied to specific locations.
- +Reporting artifacts are easy to share with stakeholders.
- –Deep automation and API-first workflows are limited.
- –Less granular debugging is available for ranking shifts.
- –Setup requires careful mapping of tracked locations to listings.
- –Export formats focus on reports more than raw data pipelines.
Best for: Fits when local SEO teams need location-organized rank tracking for recurring client reporting.
Local Falcon
vertical specialistMaps local search rankings across geographic grids for Google Business Profiles and keywords.
Time-stamped assignment and custody history view that ties each change to the responsible key holder workflow.
Local Falcon tracks key custody events by recording check-outs, check-ins, and assignment history for individual keys and holders. It supports location and category scoping so teams can run separate key workflows per site and key type.
Automation is handled through configurable rules for alerts and status changes tied to key events. Data export and reporting cover audit trail review, key utilization summaries, and overdue handling patterns.
- +Event history captures key assignment changes with time-stamped custody actions
- +Configurable alert rules target overdue and exception conditions tied to returns
- +Location and key type scoping supports multi-site key inventory workflows
- +Exports and reports support audit trail review for key custody disputes
- –API surface and automation hooks are limited for custom event workflows
- –Role governance and approval controls lack fine-grained per-key permissions
- –Barcode and RFID workflows require manual setup and process alignment
- –Mobile check-in and check-out UX can feel restrictive for high-throughput desks
Best for: Fits when facilities teams need custody tracking with event alerts and audit exports across sites.
Whitespark Local Rank Tracker
vertical specialistTracks local keyword rankings by location, search engine, device, and competitor.
Local pack and Google Maps position tracking with location targeting for city-level visibility analysis.
Whitespark Local Rank Tracker is a local SEO rank monitoring tool built around Google Maps and local pack visibility, not just desktop keyword positions. It organizes tracking by location so teams can compare SERP behavior across cities, suburbs, and custom radii.
The workflow supports exporting results for reporting and sharing performance snapshots with stakeholders. Automation is driven through recurring check schedules and bulk management of tracked keywords and locations.
- +Tracks local pack and Maps visibility alongside traditional rankings
- +Location-based tracking lets teams compare SERP results across areas
- +Scheduled checks reduce manual monitoring effort for multi-location listings
- +Reporting exports support stakeholder-ready performance snapshots
- –Best results depend on carefully defining tracked locations
- –Data model is optimized for rankings rather than deep workflow administration
Best for: Fits when local SEO teams need repeatable Maps and local pack tracking across multiple areas.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 security, Keyword.com stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right key tracking software
This buyer's guide explains how to select key tracking software for keyword monitoring or key custody workflows, based on concrete capabilities found across Keyword.com, AccuRanker, Nightwatch, Semrush Position Tracking, SE Ranking, Ahrefs Rank Tracker, Wincher, BrightLocal Local Rank Tracker, Local Falcon, and Whitespark Local Rank Tracker.
The guide covers evaluation criteria like scheduled tracking history, grouping and project organization, API or export automation, multi-location targeting, and governance fit. It also details decision steps and common setup pitfalls that show up with keyword-only tools like Wincher and with custody-focused tools like Local Falcon.
Key tracking software that records change over time, either for keyword visibility or key custody
Key tracking software records the state of tracked items over scheduled runs so teams can compare change over time and react to exceptions like ranking drops or overdue key returns. For keyword visibility, tools like AccuRanker and Semrush Position Tracking organize scheduled checks into projects and location or device contexts so stakeholders see repeatable movement reports.
For key custody workflows, tools like Nightwatch and Local Falcon track custody actions through check-out and check-in event history so teams can audit chain of custody and align custody status with operational systems. Typical users include SEO teams running recurring keyword monitoring and facilities or operations teams running multi-site custody logging with audit exports.
Evaluation criteria for tracking change, grouping scope, and automation control
Good key tracking software turns recurring tracking into interpretable history. That requires more than current positions because most workflows depend on movement over scheduled runs and the ability to map movement back to the scope that caused it.
Selection also hinges on where automation and integration fit, since Nightwatch focuses on API-first event synchronization while most keyword rank trackers emphasize exports and internal reporting views. The right combination determines whether tracking supports stakeholder reporting, operational custody logs, or both.
Scheduled tracking history with movement traceability
Keyword.com and AccuRanker both emphasize scheduled runs tied to historical movement views so teams can spot regressions instead of comparing snapshots. Keyword.com ties historical position change tracking to project dashboards for recurring stakeholder reporting, while AccuRanker ties rank movement to specific keyword groups across scheduled checks.
Project and grouping scope for repeatable reporting
AccuRanker organizes tracked work into projects and flexible grouping so reporting views map directly to tracked groups. Semrush Position Tracking and Ahrefs Rank Tracker both use project-based tracking so keyword history stays coherent across updates and competitor comparisons.
API and export automation for downstream synchronization
Nightwatch provides an API-first event synchronization approach so custody status stays aligned with external operations systems. SE Ranking adds API access and export options that support automated reporting workflows, while Keyword.com and Ahrefs Rank Tracker emphasize exportable reporting artifacts for recurring cycles.
Multi-location and device targeting for SERP correctness
Semrush Position Tracking targets locations and devices to reduce noise when comparing search results across contexts. BrightLocal Local Rank Tracker organizes local outcomes around cities and locations, while Whitespark Local Rank Tracker adds local pack and Google Maps visibility with location targeting for city-level analysis.
Custody event workflows with time-stamped assignment history
Nightwatch focuses on automated check-out and check-in workflows with consistent event history and configurable custody rules to reduce reconciliation work. Local Falcon adds time-stamped assignment and custody history that ties each change to the responsible key holder workflow and supports audit trail review for custody disputes.
Alerting tied to tracked scope and exceptions
SE Ranking supports configurable alerts tied to keyword and competitor monitoring so teams can reduce monitoring gaps. Local Falcon uses configurable alert rules targeting overdue and exception conditions tied to returns, which makes it suited for operational exception handling instead of marketing-only notifications.
Choose by tracking type first, then by history depth and automation fit
The category splits into two operational models that change what “key tracking” means. Keyword rank trackers like AccuRanker, Ahrefs Rank Tracker, and BrightLocal center on scheduled visibility history, while custody tools like Nightwatch and Local Falcon center on check-out and check-in event trails.
After the tracking type is selected, the next decision is how history is structured and how automation is handled. Tools that tie movement to groups or dashboards reduce manual interpretation, while tools with API-first event synchronization support real integration into operational systems.
Pick the tracking model: keyword visibility or custody events
If the workflow requires ranking monitoring with scheduled keyword checks and stakeholder reports, choose Keyword.com, AccuRanker, Semrush Position Tracking, SE Ranking, Ahrefs Rank Tracker, Wincher, BrightLocal Local Rank Tracker, or Whitespark Local Rank Tracker. If the workflow requires check-out, check-in, assignment history, and custody audit trails, choose Nightwatch or Local Falcon.
Verify how movement history is tied to the scope that matters
For SEO monitoring, require movement history that can be traced back to project dashboards or keyword groups so regression spotting stays fast. Keyword.com ties historical position change tracking to project dashboards, and AccuRanker ties rank change history to specific keyword groups across scheduled checks.
Decide how automation should work: API-first events or report exports
If external systems must stay synchronized with real-time custody status, Nightwatch is built for API-first event synchronization for event-driven updates. If automation can be handled by scheduled outputs and exports, SE Ranking provides API access and export options, while Keyword.com and Ahrefs Rank Tracker focus on exportable reporting artifacts for recurring reporting.
Align multi-location targeting to the audience and reporting unit
If reporting needs city-level local pack and Google Maps visibility, Whitespark Local Rank Tracker is centered on local pack and Maps position tracking with location targeting. If reporting needs location-level outcomes organized around business locations for local listings, BrightLocal Local Rank Tracker ties reporting views to specific locations and supports scheduled exports for recurring check-ins.
Stress-test governance fit by asking what happens when identifiers drift
For custody workflows, Nightwatch and Local Falcon both depend on consistent key identification and disciplined process usage for governance and audit integrity. Local Falcon also limits fine-grained per-key permission governance, so high-permission churn environments may need extra operational control design.
Which teams should use key tracking software in real operations
Key tracking software fits teams that must manage recurring change and must prove accountability through audit trails or repeatable reporting. The right tool depends on whether tracking is meant for keyword visibility or for physical key custody workflow logs.
The examples below map the tool’s best fit to how teams actually run monitoring, reporting, and exceptions.
SEO teams that run scheduled reporting cycles for stakeholders
Keyword.com fits teams that need historical position change tracking tied to project dashboards and shareable reporting views. It specifically supports scheduled rank tracking and report exports for recurring stakeholder updates.
SEO teams that need grouped trend diagnosis across sites, devices, and competitor sets
AccuRanker fits teams that require rank change history tied to keyword groups across scheduled checks with movement traceability. It also supports multi-location and device tracking so teams can compare visibility differences without losing scope.
Multi-site facilities teams that must automate custody status and sync to external systems
Nightwatch fits when automated key custody logging is required with check-out and check-in workflows that produce consistent event history. Its API-first event synchronization helps keep custody status aligned with external operations systems.
Facilities teams that need time-stamped assignment history and audit exports for disputes
Local Falcon fits when custody workflows depend on time-stamped assignment and custody history tied to the responsible key holder. It also provides audit trail review exports and overdue alert rules tied to returns.
Local SEO teams that organize rank reporting around locations and local listing context
BrightLocal Local Rank Tracker fits when location-level reporting for multi-branch business operations matters more than keyword-only dashboards. It organizes local rank outcomes around business locations and supports scheduled reports and shareable reporting artifacts.
Pitfalls that cause unreliable tracking history or unusable governance records
Most failures come from mismatched expectations about what “key tracking” means in each tool. Keyword rank trackers like Wincher cannot replace key custody workflows because they do not provide native checkout, check-in, or custody logs.
Other mistakes come from misconfigured scope and governance discipline, especially when project grouping or key identifiers drift over time.
Using a keyword rank tool for physical key custody workflows
Wincher is designed for keyword position tracking and alerting and includes no native key checkout, key check-in, or custody logs. Custody workflows require tools like Nightwatch or Local Falcon that record event history and custody status.
Letting project or grouping scope get inconsistent, which breaks movement interpretation
AccuRanker and Keyword.com both depend on how keyword targets and groups are configured, and poor grouping setup can cause mismatched reporting outputs. Configuring keyword group definitions carefully prevents rank movement from becoming hard to attribute.
Expecting API-level control without a matching integration surface
Nightwatch supports API-first event synchronization for custody workflows, while most keyword rank trackers emphasize dashboards and exports. SE Ranking provides API access and exports for automation, but exporting-based workflows can require extra downstream processing for complex custom dashboards.
Under-scoping location definitions in local rank monitoring
BrightLocal Local Rank Tracker and Whitespark Local Rank Tracker both require careful mapping of tracked locations to reporting context. Inaccurate location definitions lead to unclear comparisons when teams review city, radius, or listing-level results.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated Keyword.com, AccuRanker, Nightwatch, Semrush Position Tracking, SE Ranking, Ahrefs Rank Tracker, Wincher, BrightLocal Local Rank Tracker, Local Falcon, and Whitespark Local Rank Tracker on features, ease of use, and value, with features carrying the most weight at 40%. Ease of use and value were each weighted at 30% because day-to-day tracking setup and recurring reporting use directly affect whether teams keep the tool running.
The scoring reflects criteria visible in product capabilities like scheduled tracking history quality, rank or custody movement traceability, and whether automation is available through API-first event syncing or through export and reporting artifacts. Keyword.com separated from lower-ranked tools by tying historical position change tracking to project dashboards for recurring reporting, which increased its feature score and also supported ease of stakeholder handoffs through shareable reporting views.
Frequently Asked Questions About key tracking software
How do Nightwatch and Local Falcon differ for key checkout and check-in workflows?
Which tool is best for admin controls and role separation in key management operations?
What integration options matter most when key events must sync to other systems?
Which tool supports extensibility for automation of tracking updates and reporting?
How should teams handle data migration when moving key custody history or keyword tracking projects?
When do audit trail and overdue alerts become critical, and where is coverage strongest?
What breaks if an organization needs APIs for event-driven custody updates instead of manual exports?
Which tool best fits multi-site tracking when the same workflow must run across locations and competitors?
What is the practical tradeoff between keyword rank tracking tools and key custody systems?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Security alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of security tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare security tools→