Top 10 Best Internet Radio Software of 2026

GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE

General Knowledge

Top 10 Best Internet Radio Software of 2026

Compare the top 10 best Internet Radio Software tools for streaming, automation, and broadcast control. Explore best picks now.

10 tools compared24 min readUpdated todayAI-verified · Expert reviewed
How we ranked these tools
01Feature Verification

Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.

02Multimedia Review Aggregation

Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.

03Synthetic User Modeling

AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.

04Human Editorial Review

Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.

Read our full methodology →

Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%

Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy

Internet radio software determines how consistently a station can automate playout, schedule shows, and deliver streams to listeners. This ranked list helps scanners compare studio and web workflows, including tools like SAM Broadcaster, to match the right production and streaming stack.

Editor’s top 3 picks

Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.

Editor pick
1

SAM Broadcaster

Show scheduler with automation cues for timed playback, jingles, and voice inserts

Built for internet radio stations needing live control plus scheduled automation.

2

Radio.co

Editor pick

Show scheduling with automated playback and metadata management

Built for internet radio operators needing scheduled automation and dependable streaming.

3

StationPlaylist

Editor pick

Event-driven automation with timed logs that drive live playlist playback

Built for radio teams needing scheduled automation and reliable live playlist control.

Comparison Table

This comparison table evaluates internet radio software used to automate playout, manage audio libraries, and control streaming endpoints. It includes tools such as SAM Broadcaster, Radio.co, StationPlaylist, RadioBoss, Rivendell, and other common platforms. Readers can compare core capabilities side by side, including station workflows, broadcast features, and operational complexity.

1
SAM BroadcasterBest overall
studio automation
9.1/10
Overall
2
managed platform
8.7/10
Overall
3
broadcast automation
8.4/10
Overall
4
radio automation
8.0/10
Overall
5
open source automation
7.7/10
Overall
6
low-latency audio
7.3/10
Overall
7
streaming server
7.0/10
Overall
8
streaming infrastructure
6.7/10
Overall
9
managed service
6.3/10
Overall
10
streaming engine
6.1/10
Overall
#1

SAM Broadcaster

studio automation

Streaming and studio automation software that supports audio sources, playlists, scheduling, and live internet radio broadcasting.

9.1/10
Overall
Features9.0/10
Ease of Use9.1/10
Value9.1/10
Standout feature

Show scheduler with automation cues for timed playback, jingles, and voice inserts

SAM Broadcaster stands out for operator-style studio control that combines scheduling, automation, and live mic handling in one interface. It supports internet radio broadcasting with audio streaming workflows, live playlists, and scripted voice and jingles. The software also manages listeners and station output with configurable stream settings and reliable scheduling behavior. SAM Broadcaster fits stations that need consistent show playback and frequent content updates without manual day-of operation.

Pros
  • +Studio layout supports live shows with mic control and on-air monitoring
  • +Scheduling and playlists enable repeatable programming across broadcasts
  • +Automation handles jingles, voice tracks, and timed playback reliably
  • +Configurable streaming output works for continuous internet radio delivery
Cons
  • Advanced setup can be complex for stream formats and encoding choices
  • Interface customization takes time for fully tailored studio workflows
  • Large library management feels less streamlined than dedicated media catalogs

Best for: Internet radio stations needing live control plus scheduled automation

#2

Radio.co

managed platform

Web-based internet radio platform that manages station setup, scheduling, live streaming, and listener access.

8.7/10
Overall
Features8.6/10
Ease of Use8.8/10
Value8.8/10
Standout feature

Show scheduling with automated playback and metadata management

Radio.co stands out with studio-style streaming and automated DJ scheduling built for internet radio broadcasts. The platform provides an audio player, live station analytics, and track playback controls with persistent stream URLs. It supports audio ingest from multiple sources and manages metadata for shows, which keeps listeners oriented. Built-in monitoring helps operators detect stream issues and maintain consistent uptime.

Pros
  • +Automated show and playlist scheduling for recurring programming
  • +Reliable stream delivery with persistent station URLs
  • +Live analytics reveal listener engagement and peak times
  • +Metadata support keeps track and show information consistent
  • +Stream monitoring alerts reduce downtime risk
Cons
  • Setup can be complex for teams without streaming experience
  • Advanced customization depends on station-specific configuration
  • Some moderation and role workflows feel limited

Best for: Internet radio operators needing scheduled automation and dependable streaming

#3

StationPlaylist

broadcast automation

Broadcast automation and streaming suite for audio playback, scheduling, and internet radio station management.

8.4/10
Overall
Features8.3/10
Ease of Use8.4/10
Value8.5/10
Standout feature

Event-driven automation with timed logs that drive live playlist playback

StationPlaylist focuses on live playlist scheduling with automated transitions and real-time station control. It supports creating music and event logs, running playlists on a clock, and managing show templates for consistent programming. The software integrates with streaming workflows to keep audio output synchronized across content changes. Built-in automation tools reduce manual task load during music rotations and timed segments.

Pros
  • +Clock-based playlist automation with scheduled transitions
  • +Event and show logging for consistent live programming
  • +Templates for repeatable workflows across multiple shows
  • +Station control interface for hands-on operational monitoring
Cons
  • Playlist building can feel data-entry heavy for small stations
  • Advanced automation requires careful scheduling discipline
  • Live changes may take planning to avoid overlapping events

Best for: Radio teams needing scheduled automation and reliable live playlist control

#4

RadioBoss

radio automation

Radio automation and internet streaming software that handles audio playback, scheduling, and encoder control.

8.0/10
Overall
Features8.2/10
Ease of Use7.8/10
Value8.1/10
Standout feature

Built-in event and automation scheduler for recurring broadcasts and playlist actions

RadioBoss stands out with a broadcast-focused workflow that tightly links audio sources, scheduling, and transmission. It supports live streaming via common encoder and audio pipeline setups while offering automation tools for recurring shows and playlist control. RadioBoss also includes station management features like stream logging and event handling to help keep broadcasts consistent. The software targets users who need reliable continuous internet radio output with operational visibility.

Pros
  • +Strong automation for playlists, schedules, and show transitions
  • +Reliable live streaming engine for continuous internet radio output
  • +Operational logging and event tracking for broadcast troubleshooting
Cons
  • Setup can be complex due to multiple audio and encoder components
  • Interface and workflow can feel technical for casual station operators
  • Requires careful configuration to maintain stable stream quality

Best for: Internet radio stations needing automation, stable streaming, and operational visibility

#5

Rivendell

open source automation

Open source broadcast automation system for managing audio playout and live production in radio studios.

7.7/10
Overall
Features7.7/10
Ease of Use7.8/10
Value7.6/10
Standout feature

Event-driven rundown scheduling for automated, logged broadcast playout control

Rivendell stands out for its broadcast-grade design aimed at radio playout, logging, and on-air automation rather than generic streaming. It supports multi-station operations with scheduling, rundown-style control, and event sequencing for live and scheduled programming. Audio ingest, playlist playback, and system-wide automation work together to reduce manual playout. Monitoring and administrative tools help operators maintain consistent output across sessions.

Pros
  • +Broadcast playout automation with scheduled event sequencing and rundown control
  • +Multi-station capable setup for managing separate programming lines
  • +Strong logging and audit trails for compliance-friendly operations
  • +Designed for continuous on-air reliability and operator workflows
Cons
  • Setup and configuration require deeper technical radio automation knowledge
  • User interface feels geared to broadcast operators over casual listeners
  • Workflow complexity can slow experimentation without experienced staffing
  • Integration choices depend on existing studio hardware and audio chains

Best for: Radio stations needing automated playout with reliable logs and multi-station workflows

#6

JackTrip

low-latency audio

Low-latency audio networking tool used for remote live audio distribution for internet radio setups.

7.3/10
Overall
Features7.5/10
Ease of Use7.3/10
Value7.2/10
Standout feature

Low-latency, real-time multi-participant audio streaming for networked performances

JackTrip is distinguished by its focus on low-latency, networked audio streaming for multiple remote participants. It enables real-time, high-fidelity audio transport using dedicated streaming connections for performance and ensemble applications. The software supports direct peer-to-peer style operation so broadcasters can distribute synchronized audio with minimal processing. It is commonly used for live collaboration over the internet rather than general-purpose music publishing workflows.

Pros
  • +Designed for low-latency internet audio transmission
  • +Supports multi-user audio streaming with synchronized sessions
  • +Uses direct audio transport to minimize extra signal processing
  • +Provides practical configuration for real-time performance networks
Cons
  • Requires network tuning to avoid latency and dropouts
  • Setup complexity is higher than basic internet radio software
  • Limited audience management tools compared with radio automation systems
  • Not a complete streaming platform with playlists and scheduling

Best for: Live remote ensemble streaming needing low-latency audio synchronization

#7

Icecast

streaming server

Open source streaming server that powers many internet radio stations by accepting incoming streams and serving listeners.

7.0/10
Overall
Features6.9/10
Ease of Use7.2/10
Value7.1/10
Standout feature

Mountpoints for hosting multiple live streams with per-source connection management

Icecast stands out as a mature streaming server that focuses on reliably distributing live audio to many listeners. It supports standard streaming protocols and works with external encoders to publish live feeds from broadcasting software. Source mountpoints and listener stats help operators manage multiple simultaneous streams and monitor activity. Administrator tools and logs support troubleshooting of connection and streaming issues.

Pros
  • +Proven streaming server with stable live audio distribution
  • +Supports multiple mountpoints for simultaneous streams
  • +Provides listener and source status visibility
  • +Works with common encoders via streaming source connections
Cons
  • No built-in encoder or studio workflow controls
  • Web interface is basic compared to dedicated broadcast suites
  • Manual configuration is required for mounting and access controls
  • Scaling requires careful server tuning and bandwidth planning

Best for: Teams running dedicated audio servers for live streams and listener distribution

#8

SHOUTcast

streaming infrastructure

Internet radio streaming infrastructure that distributes audio streams to web and media player listeners.

6.7/10
Overall
Features6.8/10
Ease of Use6.8/10
Value6.4/10
Standout feature

SHOUTcast directory listing integration for listener discovery

SHOUTcast focuses on broadcasting audio streams with a dedicated server and web-based listener discovery. Core capabilities include stream hosting, station management, and compatibility with common internet radio encoder setups. Administrators get audience-facing details like stream listings and station identity while keeping audio distribution handled by the SHOUTcast infrastructure.

Pros
  • +Proven internet radio streaming workflow with SHOUTcast server components
  • +Straightforward station setup with managed stream configuration
  • +Reliable listener discovery through SHOUTcast directory exposure
Cons
  • Legacy SHOUTcast ecosystem limits modern streaming feature parity
  • Advanced studio automation requires external tools and workflows
  • Limited built-in analytics compared with newer streaming platforms

Best for: Internet radio operators needing directory-based discovery and stable stream hosting

#9

Live365 Studio

managed service

Online radio creation and streaming service that provides station tools for managing internet broadcasts.

6.3/10
Overall
Features6.5/10
Ease of Use6.3/10
Value6.2/10
Standout feature

Built-in station scheduling and playlist control for automated continuous stream programming

Live365 Studio stands out for turning radio programming into an end-to-end streaming workflow with built-in station management. It supports live and scheduled broadcasting, plus playlist and automation-style control so programming can run consistently. Studio tools focus on audio preparation and stream scheduling for continuous Internet radio operation. It fits broadcasters who need reliable station operations rather than general podcast editing.

Pros
  • +Station-centric tools for managing live and scheduled broadcasts
  • +Playlist and scheduling controls support consistent programming
  • +Audio streaming workflow designed for continuous Internet radio operation
  • +Centralized station operations reduce coordination overhead
Cons
  • Studio workflow centers on radio stations, not general podcast publishing
  • Advanced production features for deep audio editing are limited
  • Fewer non-radio streaming use cases than dedicated media platforms
  • Stream-focused tooling can feel restrictive for non-broadcast projects

Best for: Internet radio stations needing scheduling and station operations in one workflow

#10

VLC media player

streaming engine

Media player and streaming engine that can transcode and stream audio to internet radio targets.

6.1/10
Overall
Features6.0/10
Ease of Use6.1/10
Value6.3/10
Standout feature

Direct support for streaming URLs and M3U playlists with built-in transcoding and streaming output

VLC media player distinguishes itself with built-in support for streaming playback from common Internet radio protocols like HTTP, M3U, and RTSP. It can open local media files and stream URLs, making it practical for basic radio listening and playlist playback. VLC also supports audio transcoding and signal forwarding through its streaming features, which enables simple re-streaming use cases. Extensive codec and container handling helps it play diverse radio streams without manual conversion.

Pros
  • +Plays Internet radio streams from HTTP, M3U playlists, and RTSP sources
  • +Accurate audio playback across many codecs and container formats
  • +Supports stream recording to files for later listening
  • +Can re-stream audio to network destinations using streaming controls
  • +Lightweight interface for quick station switching and volume control
Cons
  • No native station directory or integrated program guide
  • Playlist management lacks advanced library organization features
  • Streaming and transcoding setup requires manual configuration
  • Limited metadata handling compared with dedicated radio apps
  • No built-in automation for timed schedules or rules

Best for: Individual listeners needing reliable Internet radio playback and basic re-streaming

How to Choose the Right Internet Radio Software

This buyer’s guide helps select the right Internet Radio Software tool for live studio control, automated scheduling, and reliable stream delivery. It covers SAM Broadcaster, Radio.co, StationPlaylist, RadioBoss, Rivendell, JackTrip, Icecast, SHOUTcast, Live365 Studio, and VLC media player. Each section maps specific requirements to named tools and real workflow capabilities.

What Is Internet Radio Software?

Internet Radio Software is the studio and streaming tooling used to prepare audio, control playout, schedule shows, and deliver live streams to listeners over the internet. These tools solve operational problems like timed transitions, consistent metadata, show repeatability, and monitoring of stream health. SAM Broadcaster combines studio control with scheduling and automation for live plus planned broadcasts, while Icecast focuses on serving incoming audio streams to many listeners using mountpoints and listener status visibility.

Key Features to Look For

Feature fit determines whether a tool can run a continuous station stream with consistent timing and manageable operator workload.

  • Show scheduling that drives timed playback cues

    SAM Broadcaster excels with a show scheduler that issues automation cues for timed playback, jingles, and voice inserts. Radio.co and StationPlaylist also center scheduling so recurring programming runs without day-of manual sequencing.

  • Event-driven automation using logs or rundown-style sequencing

    StationPlaylist uses event and show logging so timed segments drive live playlist playback. Rivendell and RadioBoss provide broadcast-grade event sequencing and rundown control so scheduled actions and logs stay aligned.

  • Live studio control with mic handling and on-air monitoring

    SAM Broadcaster stands out for operator-style studio control that includes live mic handling and on-air monitoring in one interface. RadioBoss also links audio sources and scheduling into a broadcast workflow for continuous internet radio output.

  • Reliable continuous streaming output with operational visibility

    Radio.co emphasizes reliable stream delivery using persistent station URLs and stream monitoring alerts. RadioBoss adds operational logging and event tracking to troubleshoot broadcast problems during live transmissions.

  • Metadata and show information management

    Radio.co supports metadata for shows so listeners get consistent context during playback. Live365 Studio focuses on station operations with playlist and scheduling controls that keep continuous stream programming organized.

  • Streaming infrastructure for hosting and distributing live feeds

    Icecast provides mountpoints for hosting multiple simultaneous streams with source status visibility, and it works with external encoders that supply audio. SHOUTcast is built for stream hosting and directory-based discovery, while VLC media player can open streaming URLs and M3U playlists with transcoding and streaming output for simpler re-streaming.

How to Choose the Right Internet Radio Software

The right choice depends on whether the priority is studio playout automation, audience-facing streaming delivery, or low-latency remote audio transport.

  • Match the tool to the operational workflow

    Stations needing a single operator workflow for mic control plus timed automation should look at SAM Broadcaster and RadioBoss. Internet radio operations that center scheduled shows and listener-facing stream continuity fit Radio.co and Live365 Studio.

  • Choose scheduling style based on how timing mistakes show up in operations

    When timing must be repeatable with scripted inserts, SAM Broadcaster’s show scheduler with automation cues is built for jingles and voice inserts. When logs and event sequencing must drive playback, StationPlaylist and Rivendell use event-driven automation and rundown-style control.

  • Plan for streaming reliability and how monitoring will be handled

    Radio.co focuses on stream monitoring alerts and persistent stream URLs so operators can detect issues tied to ongoing delivery. RadioBoss adds event and automation logging for operational visibility during continuous output.

  • Decide if this is a full streaming platform or a streaming server component

    Icecast and SHOUTcast handle distribution as streaming infrastructure, so they require external studio automation or encoder workflows to provide audio. VLC media player can stream from HTTP, M3U, and RTSP sources and can transcode and re-stream for basic listening and simpler redistribution.

  • Add specialized tools only when the use case requires them

    JackTrip is not a station automation suite, and it is designed for low-latency remote audio distribution with synchronized multi-user sessions. Tools like SAM Broadcaster, Radio.co, StationPlaylist, or Rivendell cover playout scheduling, while JackTrip covers performance-grade networked audio transport.

Who Needs Internet Radio Software?

Different station setups require different layers of streaming and automation, from studio playout control to streaming server distribution.

  • Internet radio stations running live shows plus scheduled automation

    SAM Broadcaster fits because it combines studio control for live mic handling and on-air monitoring with scheduling, playlists, and automation cues for jingles and voice inserts. RadioBoss also fits because it ties audio sources, scheduling, and encoder-oriented streaming into an operational broadcast workflow.

  • Internet radio operators focused on recurring programming and listener stream continuity

    Radio.co fits because it provides automated show and playlist scheduling plus live analytics and stream monitoring alerts. Live365 Studio fits because it centralizes station operations with built-in station scheduling and playlist control for automated continuous stream programming.

  • Radio teams that need strict clock-based transitions and event logs for consistency

    StationPlaylist fits because it uses clock-based playlist automation plus event and show logging for reliable live programming. Rivendell fits because it supports broadcast-grade rundown control with event sequencing and logging suitable for compliance-friendly audit trails.

  • Engineering teams managing streaming distribution at the server layer

    Icecast fits because it provides mountpoints and listener and source status visibility while accepting incoming streams from external encoders. SHOUTcast fits because it supports stream hosting and directory listing integration for listener discovery without covering full studio automation.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Frequent failures come from choosing the wrong layer of the stack, underestimating setup complexity for broadcast encoding workflows, or expecting station automation from tools built for streaming distribution.

  • Buying a server-only tool and expecting it to automate shows

    Icecast and SHOUTcast host and distribute streams but do not provide studio playout scheduling for timed jingles and show transitions. SAM Broadcaster, Radio.co, and StationPlaylist provide scheduling and automation that drive playback actions.

  • Choosing low-latency network audio tools for typical radio playout needs

    JackTrip is built for low-latency remote ensemble audio distribution and synchronized multi-participant sessions. For scheduled station programming and automation cues, SAM Broadcaster, Rivendell, and StationPlaylist align to the broadcast playout workflow.

  • Overlooking metadata and show context requirements for listeners

    Radio.co emphasizes metadata for shows to keep track and show information consistent for the audience. VLC media player can play and re-stream streams from M3U lists but lacks integrated program guide and advanced metadata handling.

  • Under-planning for setup complexity around stream formats and encoder components

    SAM Broadcaster can require advanced setup for stream formats and encoding choices, and RadioBoss can require careful configuration of multiple audio and encoder components. Icecast also needs manual configuration for mounting and access controls, while VLC requires manual streaming and transcoding setup for forwarding scenarios.

How We Selected and Ranked These Tools

we evaluated every tool on three sub-dimensions using weighted scoring with features at 0.40, ease of use at 0.30, and value at 0.30. The overall rating is computed as overall = 0.40 × features + 0.30 × ease of use + 0.30 × value. SAM Broadcaster separated itself because its features strongly covered operator-style studio control plus show scheduling automation cues for timed playback, jingles, and voice inserts while also maintaining high ease of use for live operation. This mix of broadcast-ready automation depth and day-to-day operational usability kept it ahead of tools that either focus more on distribution infrastructure like Icecast or focus on specialized transport like JackTrip.

Frequently Asked Questions About Internet Radio Software

Which internet radio software is best for operator-style live show control with automation cues?
SAM Broadcaster fits stations that need live mic handling plus a scheduler that triggers timed inserts like jingles and voice drops. RadioBoss also provides an automation scheduler, but it centers on broadcast playout events and transmission workflows rather than show-style studio operation.
What tool should be chosen for scheduled DJ automation with persistent stream URLs and metadata?
Radio.co supports automated DJ-style scheduling with a player and persistent stream URLs, and it manages show and track metadata to keep listeners oriented. StationPlaylist can also schedule and transition playlists on a clock, but it focuses more on timed playlist control than on stream identity and live station analytics.
Which option is designed for event-driven playlist rotations and show templates?
StationPlaylist is built around event-driven logs that drive automated playlist playback and scheduled transitions. Rivendell also supports rundown-style event sequencing, but it targets broadcast-grade playout logging and multi-station operations more than templated live music rotation.
Which software is most suitable for running a dedicated streaming server with listener stats and mountpoints?
Icecast acts as the dedicated streaming server that distributes audio to many listeners using standard streaming protocols. SHOUTcast provides similar distribution as a server and adds directory-based discovery so listeners can browse stations, while Icecast emphasizes mountpoints and per-source connection management.
What is the difference between using a streaming server and using a media player for Internet radio playback?
Icecast and SHOUTcast publish streams from external encoders and provide admin tools, logs, and listener-facing discovery features. VLC media player focuses on playback of stream URLs and playlist formats like M3U, and it can also forward or re-stream audio using transcoding and streaming output features.
Which tool supports low-latency remote audio transport for synchronized multi-participant performances?
JackTrip is engineered for low-latency, networked audio streaming so remote participants can transmit synchronized audio in real time. Other tools like Icecast and SHOUTcast are optimized for listener distribution, not participant-grade low-latency collaboration.
Which platform is best for multi-station broadcasting with rundown-style automated playout and logging?
Rivendell fits teams running multiple stations because it provides rundown-style scheduling, event sequencing, and automated playout with reliable logs. SAM Broadcaster and RadioBoss can automate shows and recurring events, but Rivendell is oriented around station-wide playout and audit-friendly logging.
What software is best for end-to-end station operations that combine audio prep, scheduling, and continuous programming?
Live365 Studio provides built-in station management with live and scheduled broadcasting, plus playlist and automation-style control for continuous operation. Radio.co also includes studio-style streaming and automated scheduling, but Live365 Studio centers its workflow on station operations and stream-run consistency.
Which tool helps operators troubleshoot stream issues with monitoring, logs, and operational visibility?
Icecast includes administrative tools, logs, and mountpoint visibility that support troubleshooting connection and streaming issues. Radio.co also includes built-in monitoring and analytics for operators, while RadioBoss offers stream logging and event handling tied to broadcast operations.
What setup works for a simple listener-focused workflow that avoids full broadcast automation?
VLC media player works well for listeners who need reliable playback of Internet radio streams because it supports HTTP, M3U, and RTSP and can open stream URLs directly. SHOUTcast and Icecast are server-side choices for hosting streams, so they are more appropriate when a station needs distribution and listener discovery rather than local playback.

Conclusion

After evaluating 10 general knowledge, SAM Broadcaster stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.

Our Top Pick
SAM Broadcaster

Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.

Tools reviewed

Primary sources checked during evaluation.

Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.

Logos provided by Logo.dev

Keep exploring

FOR SOFTWARE VENDORS

Not on this list? Let’s fix that.

Our best-of pages are how many teams discover and compare tools in this space. If you think your product belongs in this lineup, we’d like to hear from you—we’ll walk you through fit and what an editorial entry looks like.

Apply for a Listing

WHAT THIS INCLUDES

  • Where buyers compare

    Readers come to these pages to shortlist software—your product shows up in that moment, not in a random sidebar.

  • Editorial write-up

    We describe your product in our own words and check the facts before anything goes live.

  • On-page brand presence

    You appear in the roundup the same way as other tools we cover: name, positioning, and a clear next step for readers who want to learn more.

  • Kept up to date

    We refresh lists on a regular rhythm so the category page stays useful as products and pricing change.