GITNUXSOFTWARE ADVICE
Storage Moving RelocationTop 10 Best Image Sorter Software of 2026
Top 10 image sorter software ranked for photo organization, including Google Photos, Apple Photos, Eagle, Zoner Photo Studio X, and Excire Foto.
How we ranked these tools
Core product claims cross-referenced against official documentation, changelogs, and independent technical reviews.
Analyzed video reviews and hundreds of written evaluations to capture real-world user experiences with each tool.
AI persona simulations modeled how different user types would experience each tool across common use cases and workflows.
Final rankings reviewed and approved by our editorial team with authority to override AI-generated scores based on domain expertise.
Score: Features 40% · Ease 30% · Value 30%
Gitnux may earn a commission through links on this page — this does not influence rankings. Editorial policy
Eagle is the best fit for visual professionals who need local, granular sorting of images and design assets with smart tags and visual filters, whereas Zoner Photo Studio X works better for photographers who want a single desktop catalog for metadata-aware sorting, batch renaming, and exports.
Editor’s top 3 picks
Three quick recommendations before you dive into the full comparison below — each one leads on a different dimension.
Eagle
Browser capture extension saves online images and complete webpages into the same searchable Eagle library.
Built for fits when visual professionals need local asset control with browser capture and granular collection sorting..
Zoner Photo Studio X
Editor pickNon-destructive editing pipeline keeps culls and edits reversible while exporting selected batches.
Built for fits when photographers need metadata-aware sorting, batch renaming, and exports from a desktop catalog..
Excire Foto
Editor pickExcire AI Search combines natural-language queries with reference-image matching to locate semantically or visually related photographs.
Built for fits when photographers need AI-assisted local cataloging across large personal archives..
Related reading
Comparison Table
Eagle
vertical specialistAsset organizer for images and design files with tags, smart folders, color filters, and visual sorting.
Browser capture extension saves online images and complete webpages into the same searchable Eagle library.
Eagle combines a desktop asset library with browser capture tools for collecting reference images from websites and applications. Its folder and tag structure supports nested organization, while smart folders can filter libraries using criteria such as tags, ratings, colors, and file attributes. Local library storage gives users direct control over files and backup locations.
The main tradeoff is limited collaboration compared with cloud-first photo services because Eagle centers on local libraries rather than shared workspaces. It fits designers, marketers, and researchers who collect visual references from many sources and need fast retrieval without importing every asset into a cloud gallery.
- +Browser extension captures images, webpages, and screenshots directly into organized libraries
- +Nested folders and tags support detailed visual asset classification
- +Smart folders filter assets by metadata, ratings, colors, and tags
- +Plugin APIs support custom extensions and specialized collection workflows
- –No native multi-user workspace for simultaneous library management
- –Local libraries require deliberate backup and synchronization planning
- –Photo editing tools remain focused on annotation rather than full image development
- –Mobile access is less central than desktop library management
Product and UX designers
Collecting interface references
Faster reference retrieval
Marketing content teams
Managing campaign assets
Clearer asset selection
Show 2 more scenarios
Researchers and moodboard creators
Building visual research archives
Structured research archives
Nested folders, notes, and annotations preserve source context alongside collected images and documents.
Independent photographers
Culling reference collections
Cleaner reference libraries
Ratings, tags, and duplicate detection help organize downloaded references without replacing a dedicated RAW editor.
Best for: Fits when visual professionals need local asset control with browser capture and granular collection sorting.
Zoner Photo Studio X
SMBPhoto workflow software that combines cataloging, sorting, culling, and editing in one desktop app.
Non-destructive editing pipeline keeps culls and edits reversible while exporting selected batches.
Zoner Photo Studio X fits image sorting teams that need consistent folder templates and repeatable batch operations across large directories. Metadata-driven workflows are supported through EXIF, IPTC, and XMP handling during ingest and editing, which enables filtering by camera details and timestamps. Directory tree visualization supports quick navigation and bulk actions without forcing a separate DAM system.
A tradeoff appears in automation depth for external systems since Zoner Photo Studio X does not market a broad public automation API surface. Zoner Photo Studio X is a strong fit when photographers sort high-volume shoots on a single workstation and then export a curated folder hierarchy for clients or archives.
- +Batch renaming rules apply across directory batches with predictable results.
- +Lossless rotation keeps original files intact during orientation fixes.
- +Non-destructive editing enables culling without overwriting source data.
- +Directory tree visualization supports fast navigation for large folders.
- –Automation integration depends more on in-app workflows than open APIs.
- –Deep governance controls are limited for multi-user catalog administration.
- –Duplicate detection relies on manual review for edge cases.
Wedding photographers
Sort multi-card shoots into client sets
Fewer rework passes
Freelance event shooters
Rename and structure files for delivery
Quicker handoff to clients
Show 2 more scenarios
Small studio teams
Metadata filter for selectivity
Faster target selection
EXIF and IPTC metadata handling supports filtering by camera settings and timestamps.
Archival operators
Prepare reversible cleanup workflow
Cleaner long-term archives
Lossless rotation and non-destructive edits support orientation cleanup before export.
Best for: Fits when photographers need metadata-aware sorting, batch renaming, and exports from a desktop catalog.
Excire Foto
vertical specialistAI-assisted photo management software with automatic keywording, people search, and aesthetic culling tools.
Excire AI Search combines natural-language queries with reference-image matching to locate semantically or visually related photographs.
Excire Foto builds a searchable catalog from existing folders while leaving original files in place. Its AI search accepts descriptive text and reference images, which helps locate photos that lack consistent keywords. Face grouping adds a practical way to find recurring subjects across large personal archives.
The desktop workflow favors photographers managing local drives, external disks, and long-running personal collections. Excire Foto does not replace Lightroom or Photoshop because editing and DAM integration remain limited. A public automation API, RBAC, and centralized team administration are not part of the product's operating model.
- +Local cataloging keeps photo analysis on the photographer's computer.
- +Natural-language queries reduce dependence on manually assigned keywords.
- +Face grouping identifies recurring people across imported folders.
- +Duplicate and similarity searches help reduce archive redundancy.
- –No public API, RBAC, or administrative console supports team-wide governance.
- –Built-in editing remains limited compared with Lightroom or Photoshop.
- –Catalog management suits desktop archives better than distributed team libraries.
- –AI analysis requires an initial scan of each imported collection.
Professional photographers
Culling large event shoots
Faster first-pass culling
Family archivists
Organizing scanned albums
Searchable personal archive
Show 1 more scenario
Creative agencies
Finding visual references
Faster asset retrieval
Reference-image search retrieves compositionally similar assets without consistent keywording.
Best for: Fits when photographers need AI-assisted local cataloging across large personal archives.
Adobe Lightroom
SMBPhoto management and editing software with strong rating, keywording, filtering, and library sorting tools.
Smart use of Collections plus metadata-driven filtering for iterative culling before export within the same catalog.
Adobe Lightroom centers image sorting around non-destructive cataloging, where photos move through collections, ratings, and keyword metadata rather than physical copies. It can batch rename using filename and metadata rules, which helps normalize series naming before export to an archive or client delivery folder.
Lightroom’s metadata pipeline includes EXIF reading plus XMP sidecar handling for workflows that rely on external tagging and synchronization. Watch-folder ingestion and bulk move workflows support high-throughput sorting, but advanced automation depends more on Lightroom’s catalog conventions than on API-driven ingestion.
- +Non-destructive catalog sorting with collections, ratings, and keyword workflows
- +Batch renaming rules built around filenames and metadata fields
- +EXIF parsing and XMP sidecar synchronization support external metadata edits
- +Fast bulk culling and export from the same selection workflow
- –Automation options do not cover arbitrary file-watching logic seen in dedicated sorters
- –Sidecar synchronization can lag behind edits when catalog and file states diverge
- –Large libraries require consistent folder strategy to avoid duplicated content
- –No full directory-tree automation for templated archival exports inside Lightroom
Best for: Fits when photo workflows need fast culling and metadata-based sorting inside a Lightroom catalog, with selective automation for exports.
Photo Mechanic
vertical specialistFast photo ingest, culling, tagging, and sorting software built for high-volume image workflows.
Non-destructive sidecar synchronization and metadata-aware export keep edits and keywords attached during file moves.
Photo Mechanic ingests large photo sets fast and helps cull images through instant preview, keyboard-driven ratings, and tight thumbnail navigation. Metadata workflows are a core strength, including EXIF, IPTC, and XMP sidecar handling so sort decisions can stay tied to real capture and editing context.
It supports batch renaming and folder output based on rules, which reduces manual rework during handoffs to editing or DAM systems. For image-sorting automation, it pairs well with watch-folder style ingestion patterns and can hand off selected files while preserving non-destructive edit references through sidecar synchronization.
- +Keyboard-first review workflow keeps throughput high for high-volume shoots
- +Metadata-aware selection and export uses EXIF, IPTC, and XMP sidecars
- +Batch renaming and rule-based folder output reduce post-culling cleanup
- +Instant previews support fast culling decisions without opening editors
- –Automation depends more on external workflows than on a built-in rules engine
- –Deeper governance features like RBAC and audit logs are limited for teams
- –DAM integration needs additional setup for consistent mapping and sync behavior
- –Advanced people recognition and clustering are not built into the core sorter
Best for: Fits when photographers need fast culling, metadata-based sorting, and consistent file handoff for downstream editors.
digiKam
SMBOpen source photo management application with albums, tags, labels, filters, and face recognition.
digiKam’s non-destructive workflow keeps edits separate from originals while metadata-driven rules update views and actions.
digiKam targets people who want a local-first image sorting workflow with batch operations and a metadata-centric view of large photo libraries. It extracts and edits photo metadata, including EXIF and IPTC fields, then applies those fields to curation actions like filtering and batch renaming.
The app supports RAW handling workflows, non-destructive rotation, and sidecar synchronization for formats that rely on XMP files. digiKam also includes duplicate detection, contact sheet generation, and directory tree visualization to help organize without moving everything at once.
- +EXIF and IPTC extraction feeds filters and batch renaming rules
- +Non-destructive orientation fixes keep the original image data intact
- +RAW workflows support consistent sorting across mixed camera outputs
- +Directory tree visualization helps map curation actions to real folders
- –Automation via rules often needs careful setup and iterative tuning
- –Face recognition clustering is not as mature as dedicated DAM suites
- –Large libraries can feel slower without database and index maintenance
- –Adding advanced behavior usually depends on extra plugins
Best for: Fits when local photo libraries need metadata-driven sorting and batch operations without full cloud migration.
FastStone Image Viewer
SMBImage browser and viewer with thumbnail sorting, batch tools, tagging support, and folder-based organization.
Lossless rotation with EXIF orientation auto-correction integrated into day-to-day viewing and sorting.
FastStone Image Viewer targets fast local culling and sorting with a file-browsing workflow instead of cloud DAM features. It supports batch renaming, directory tree navigation, and lossless orientation auto-correction while previewing images in multiple viewing modes.
Metadata handling is practical for sorting, with EXIF parser support and tools to copy or strip certain fields during batch operations. The overall experience favors throughput on a single machine with keyboard-driven triage rather than deep integration with external photo systems.
- +Keyboard-first preview and culling workflow for large local folders
- +Batch renaming rules for consistent filenames across directories
- +Lossless rotation and orientation correction during viewing
- +Directory tree navigation with fast thumbnail and full-screen modes
- –No watch-folder ingestion for automated background sorting
- –Duplicate detection is limited compared with dedicated dedupe engines
- –Automation and API surface are not available for external integrations
- –Metadata sidecar and synchronization tooling is thin
Best for: Fits when local photo triage needs fast preview, renaming, and folder-based sorting without external integrations.
XnView MP
SMBCross-platform image browser and organizer with rating, tagging, filtering, and batch sorting features.
Directory tree visualization combined with batch renaming and repeatable filter views for high-volume desktop sorting.
XnView MP is a desktop image sorter aimed at high-throughput file browsing, previewing, and batch operations across a wide set of image formats.
It supports EXIF parsing for filtering and sorting, plus robust batch renaming and directory tree visualization to manage large photo libraries.
The workflow centers on repeatable view filters and curation actions rather than a cloud-first library model.
XnView MP also covers culling-style review tools like contact sheets to move from inspection to organized folders.
- +Fast directory tree browsing for large libraries
- +Strong batch renaming rules with filename variables
- +Filter and sort using EXIF fields and timestamps
- +Contact sheet generation for quick culling reviews
- –Automation is primarily batch actions rather than scheduled ingestion
- –Advanced filter building can require UI experimentation
- –No native cloud sync or cross-device library model
- –Metadata round-tripping expectations vary by workflow
Best for: Fits when managing large local photo sets needs repeatable filters, batch renaming, and review output without cloud dependencies.
MAGIX Photo Manager
SMBPhoto organization software with album management, duplicates search, and image sorting tools.
Built-in contact sheet generation that renders selection reviews directly from sorted albums.
MAGIX Photo Manager imports large photo sets and uses a browser-driven sorting workflow with collections and folder targets. The app can filter by metadata fields for fast culling and can drive batch rename and export operations in one pass.
A built-in contact sheet generator supports quick review output without switching tools. Orientation auto-correction and basic non-destructive adjustments keep sorting work usable for later review.
- +Batch rename and export run from the same sorting workflow
- +Contact sheet generation supports rapid visual review and selection
- +Orientation auto-correction reduces mis-rotated image handling
- +Metadata-based filtering speeds up culling across mixed folders
- –Duplicate detection coverage is weaker than specialized dedup tools
- –Automation is limited to batch actions rather than rule pipelines
- –Metadata stripping and sidecar sync are not a first-class workflow focus
- –Watch-folder ingestion for ongoing directories is limited
Best for: Fits when photographers want a local, metadata-filtered sorting workflow with batch rename and review outputs.
Tonfotos
SMBPhoto and video organizer with timeline, people grouping, location views, and local library sorting.
Rule-based folder hierarchy templates that map capture attributes into target directories during batch ingestion.
Tonfotos is an image sorter built around automated organization rules that move photos into a target folder structure from file and metadata inputs. It focuses on batch workflows such as ingesting directories, applying renaming and folder templates, and generating repeatable sorting runs for large photo sets.
The workflow supports metadata-based filtering so sorting can key off attributes like timestamps and capture details instead of only filename patterns. Tonfotos also targets duplicate-related cleanup and culling handoffs through deterministic sorting outputs that can be reviewed.
- +Batch rule engine converts metadata and paths into deterministic folder outputs
- +Folder hierarchy templates reduce manual sorting steps across large libraries
- +Metadata-based filtering supports timestamp and capture-detail driven culls
- +Repeatable runs make it practical to re-sort after importing new sets
- –Duplicate detection coverage can feel narrow for mixed naming and mixed-capture scenarios
- –Complex renaming and hierarchy templates require careful pre-setup
- –Extensibility options via API or integrations are not clearly central to the product
- –Sidecar synchronization across edited images needs validation in real workflows
Best for: Fits when personal libraries need repeatable batch sorting rules with reviewable folder results.
Conclusion
After evaluating 10 storage moving relocation, Eagle stands out as our overall top pick — it scored highest across our combined criteria of features, ease of use, and value, which is why it sits at #1 in the rankings above.
Use the comparison table and detailed reviews above to validate the fit against your own requirements before committing to a tool.
How to Choose the Right image sorter software
Image sorter software organizes photo libraries using metadata-aware workflows, batch actions, and repeatable folder or collection rules, with Eagle leading the set through browser capture that saves images, webpages, and screenshots into a searchable library. The list also covers desktop cataloging and metadata sorting in tools like Zoner Photo Studio X and Photo Mechanic, plus local AI search in Excire Foto.
Some options focus on review speed and reversible edits, such as Photo Mechanic’s sidecar synchronization and Zoner Photo Studio X’s non-destructive editing pipeline. Others emphasize local library browsing and deterministic outputs, including digiKam for metadata-driven rules and Tonfotos for rule-based folder hierarchy templates.
Image sorter software for metadata-aware culling, batch renaming, and deterministic folder or library organization
Image sorter software takes images from folders or ingestion workflows, reads metadata from sources like EXIF, IPTC, and XMP sidecars, and then applies filters, batch renaming rules, and export or move actions that produce consistent organization results. Eagle goes beyond folder-based workflows by capturing online assets through its browser extension into the same organized library.
Sorting quality depends on how edits and metadata stay attached across moves, because tools like Photo Mechanic use non-destructive sidecar synchronization so keywords and edits remain linked during file handoff. Automation depth also varies, with Zoner Photo Studio X prioritizing reversible culls and batch exports inside a desktop workflow and Excire Foto relying on natural-language plus reference-image matching to locate related photos in a local catalog.
Metadata-aware sorting controls, automation surface, and file linkage behavior
The category also splits between catalog-centric workflows and deterministic batch pipelines. Zoner Photo Studio X and Photo Mechanic focus on reversible edits and metadata-aware export, while digiKam and Tonfotos emphasize rule-driven organization that stays repeatable across large folders.
Capture-to-library ingestion and library unification
Eagle saves images, webpages, and screenshots from the browser capture extension into the same searchable Eagle library with nested folders and tags for classification.
Non-destructive edit pipelines and reversible culling
Zoner Photo Studio X applies a non-destructive editing pipeline so culls and edits stay reversible when exporting selected batches. Photo Mechanic also supports non-destructive sidecar synchronization so edits and keywords remain attached during file moves.
Sidecar synchronization and metadata retention during moves
Photo Mechanic keeps EXIF, IPTC, and XMP sidecars linked during file moves so selection exports preserve the metadata context. Lightroom can lag when catalog and file states diverge, which can break sidecar synchronization timing.
Rule engines for deterministic batch renaming and folder outputs
Tonfotos uses rule-based folder hierarchy templates that convert capture attributes into deterministic target directories during batch ingestion. digiKam provides EXIF and IPTC extraction that feeds filters and batch renaming rules for metadata-driven organization.
In-catalog sorting workflows that combine filtering with review
Lightroom uses Collections plus metadata-driven filtering to support iterative culling before export inside one catalog. MAGIX Photo Manager adds contact sheet generation tied to sorted albums so visual selection reviews happen right from the output workflow.
AI-assisted retrieval versus rule-based organization
Excire Foto runs AI Search that supports natural-language queries combined with reference-image matching to locate semantically or visually related photographs. Lightroom focuses more on metadata-driven filtering within a catalog and does not provide a comparable reference-image matching workflow.
Pick based on workflow shape: ingestion, linkage integrity, and automation reach
Next, choose between AI search for retrieval and rules for deterministic folder outputs. Excire Foto emphasizes natural-language and reference-image matching inside a local catalog, while Tonfotos and digiKam emphasize rules that turn metadata into predictable hierarchy and batch renaming outcomes.
Choose an ingestion entry point that matches daily capture locations
If browser capture is a core input, Eagle captures images, webpages, and screenshots directly into one library with nested folder and tag classification. If local triage from directory browsing is the core loop, XnView MP and FastStone prioritize keyboard-first review and directory tree browsing with batch renaming.
Validate metadata linkage behavior for your move and export pattern
Photo Mechanic is built around non-destructive sidecar synchronization so keywords and edits stay attached during file moves and metadata-aware export. Lightroom can show sidecar synchronization lag when catalog and file states diverge, which matters for workflows that interleave catalog edits with external file operations.
Pick the automation depth that matches team or solo governance needs
If automation must extend beyond in-app flows into broader integration and administration, Zoner Photo Studio X places more of the automation on in-app workflows than open APIs and keeps governance controls limited for multi-user administration. If governance and team provisioning via RBAC and an administrative console are required, Excire Foto lacks public API, RBAC, or a team-wide administrative console.
Decide between AI retrieval and deterministic rule-based outputs
For finding photos by describing intent or matching a reference image, Excire Foto uses AI Search with natural-language queries plus reference-image matching. For converting metadata into repeatable folder hierarchies, Tonfotos and digiKam use rule-driven templates and metadata-extraction feeds that produce consistent directory results.
Stress-test batch renaming and review output for your naming conventions
Zoner Photo Studio X runs batch renaming rules across directory batches with predictable results, which fits structured renaming across imports. Eagle also supports granular collection sorting with nested folders and tags, which fits classification systems that separate naming from organization.
Check whether deduplication and duplicate coverage meet your archive scale
Eagle focuses on capture and library organization rather than specialized duplicate detection, and its strength is searchable capture classification rather than a dedicated dedupe engine. FastStone and MAGIX Photo Manager both have duplicate detection that is limited compared with specialized dedupe tools, which affects mixed naming and mixed-capture archives.
Who image sorter software fits best by workflow and governance expectations
Team governance needs separate the short list because several tools emphasize local workflows and in-app administration rather than public automation interfaces or multi-user governance controls. Local-only cataloging also changes how users handle sidecar synchronization and external file changes during editing and export.
Visual professionals who capture evidence from browsers and want local control
Eagle captures images, webpages, and screenshots into one searchable library and keeps organization aligned to nested folders and tags for detailed asset classification.
Photographers who do high-volume review with metadata-aware culling and reversible edits
Photo Mechanic’s keyboard-first review workflow and metadata-aware selection export rely on EXIF, IPTC, and XMP sidecars for consistent file handoff. Zoner Photo Studio X supports a non-destructive editing pipeline so culls and edits remain reversible when exporting batches.
Local catalog owners who want retrieval by visual similarity or intent text
Excire Foto uses natural-language queries combined with reference-image matching in its AI Search, which reduces dependence on manually assigned keywords for locating related photos.
Users who need deterministic folder hierarchy outputs from capture attributes
Tonfotos applies rule-based folder hierarchy templates that map metadata into target directories during batch ingestion, which reduces manual sorting steps across large libraries.
Users who need local file browsing with repeatable batch actions and filters
XnView MP provides directory tree visualization with batch renaming and repeatable filter views, which supports review output without cloud dependency. FastStone emphasizes lossless rotation with EXIF orientation auto-correction and keyboard-first preview for local folder triage.
Common selection pitfalls when evaluating image sorter software
Another frequent mistake is building a team workflow on a tool that lacks multi-user governance and automation interfaces. Excire Foto limits team-wide governance with no public API, RBAC, or administrative console, while Zoner Photo Studio X keeps governance controls limited for multi-user catalog administration.
Choosing a tool that preserves metadata in theory but not during the exact move and export sequence
Photo Mechanic is designed around non-destructive sidecar synchronization for file moves, while Lightroom can lag sidecar synchronization when catalog and file states diverge after external edits.
Assuming rule automation works like an ingestion scheduler with watch-folder logic
Zoner Photo Studio X and Lightning-style in-catalog workflows focus on in-app workflows rather than arbitrary file-watching logic, which affects automated background sorting compared with dedicated sorters.
Building collaboration on tools that lack multi-user governance controls
Excire Foto has no public API, RBAC, or administrative console for team-wide governance, and Zoner Photo Studio X keeps deep governance controls limited for multi-user catalog administration.
Over-indexing on browser capture while ignoring backup and synchronization planning for local libraries
Eagle’s strength is local libraries that are backed by deliberate backup and synchronization planning, because it does not provide a native multi-user workspace for simultaneous library management.
Relying on weak duplicate detection while expecting near-dedupe outcomes
MAGIX Photo Manager and FastStone have duplicate detection that is limited compared with specialized dedupe engines, which reduces reliability for mixed naming and mixed-capture scenarios.
How We Selected and Ranked These Tools
We evaluated image sorter software on feature coverage for metadata-aware sorting, reversible edits, and batch renaming and export, plus ease of review workflows like keyboard-first culling and directory tree browsing. Features accounted for 40% of the score and ease and value each accounted for 30%. Eagle ranked first because its browser capture extension saves images, webpages, and screenshots directly into the same organized Eagle library, and it couples that ingestion with nested folders and tags for granular classification.
Frequently Asked Questions About image sorter software
How does Eagle handle web capture compared with Lightroom and Photo Mechanic?
Which tools support natural-language search and visual similarity matching for photo discovery?
How do batch renaming and folder templates differ between Tonfotos and Zoner Photo Studio X?
What breaks if sidecar synchronization is missing when exporting from Photo Mechanic or digiKam?
When should watch-folder style ingestion be used in Lightroom compared with desktop indexing in Excire Foto?
Which applications provide duplicate detection and how do the tradeoffs show up in the sorting workflow?
How do admin controls and RBAC show up across these tools for teams managing shared libraries?
What security and audit gaps exist when a workflow depends on browser capture like Eagle?
How should data migration be planned when moving libraries from XnView MP or FastStone to a metadata-centric catalog like digiKam?
Where do directory tree visualization and contact sheets differ between XnView MP and MAGIX Photo Manager?
Tools reviewed
Primary sources checked during evaluation.
Referenced in the comparison table and product reviews above.
Keep exploring
Comparing two specific tools?
Software Alternatives
See head-to-head software comparisons with feature breakdowns, pricing, and our recommendation for each use case.
Explore software alternatives→In this category
Storage Moving Relocation alternatives
See side-by-side comparisons of storage moving relocation tools and pick the right one for your stack.
Compare storage moving relocation tools→